Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 61381-61383 [2012-24814]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2012 / Notices
7106, Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no
later than ten (10) calendar days
following publication of this notice.
Please follow the requirements set
forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR
315.9 for procedures to request a public
hearing. The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance official number
and title for the program under which
these petitions are submitted is 11.313,
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms.
Dated: October 2, 2012.
Miriam Kearse,
Eligibility Examiner.
[FR Doc. 2012–24747 Filed 10–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–45–2012]
Foreign-Trade Zone 7—Mayaguez,
Puerto Rico, Authorization of
Production Activity, Baxter Healthcare
of Puerto Rico, (Pharmaceutical and
Nutritional Intravenous Bags and
Administration Sets); Aibonito and
Jayuya, Puerto Rico
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Puerto Rico Industrial
Development Company, grantee of FTZ
7, submitted a notification of proposed
production activity to the Foreign-Trade
Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Baxter
Healthcare of Puerto Rico, at two sites
within FTZ 7, located in Aibonito and
Jayuya, Puerto Rico.
The notification was processed in
accordance with the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (77 FR 36997, 6/20/
2012). The FTZ Board has determined
that no further review of the activity is
warranted at this time. The production
activity described in the notification is
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.14.
Dated: October 2, 2012.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
15:28 Oct 05, 2012
International Trade Administration
[A–533–843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2010–2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) is
conducting an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
lined paper products (CLPP) from India.
The period of review is September 1,
2010, through August 31, 2011 and the
review covers 57 producers/exporters of
the subject merchandise. We have
preliminarily found that sales of the
subject merchandise have been made at
prices below normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Robinson or James Terpstra, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–3797 or (202) 482–
3965, respectively.
AGENCY:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is certain lined paper products.
The merchandise subject to this order is
currently classified under the following
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080,
4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044,
4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090,
4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020,
4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040,
4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and
4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
product description, available in
Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain
Lined Paper Products from India,
Indonesia and the People’s Republic of
China, 71 FR 56949 (September 28,
2006), remains dispositive.
Methodology
[FR Doc. 2012–24827 Filed 10–5–12; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Jkt 229001
The Department has conducted this
review in accordance with Section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Export prices and
constructed export prices have been
calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61381
773 of the Act. In making these findings,
we have relied, in part, on facts
available and because one or more
respondents did not act to the best of
their ability to respond to the
Department’s requests for information,
we have drawn an adverse inference in
selecting from among the facts
otherwise available. See sections 776(a)
and (b) of the Act. In accordance with
section 773(b) of the Act, we
disregarded the below-cost sales of
Riddhi in the most recent administrative
review of this company completed
before the initiation of this review. With
regard to SAB, petitioners filed an
allegation demonstrating that SAB made
sales below the cost of production.
Therefore, we have reasonable grounds
to believe or suspect that Riddhi’s and
SAB’s sales of the foreign like product
under consideration for the
determination of normal value in this
review may have been made at prices
below the cost of production (COP) as
provided by section 773(b)(2)(A)(ii) of
the Act. Accordingly, pursuant to
section 773(b)(1) of the Act, we have
conducted a COP analysis of Riddhi’s
and SAB’s sales in India in this review.
Based on this test, we disregarded
certain sales made by Riddhi and SAB
in their respective comparison markets
which were made at below-cost prices.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, please see the
memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Certain Lined
Paper Products from India’’ (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with these results and
hereby adopted by this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in
the Central Records Unit (CRU), room
7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at
https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
61382
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2012 / Notices
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that the
following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period September
1, 2010, through August 31, 2011:
A. Calculated Rate for the Two
Mandatory Companies
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Manufacturer/Exporter
Riddhi Enterprises, Ltd. ........
SAB International ..................
3.86
2.30
B. Rate for the Non-Selected,
Cooperative Respondents
Manufacturer/Exporter
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent) 1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Abhinav Paper Products Pvt
Ltd .....................................
American Scholar, Inc. and/
or I–Scholar .......................
A R Printing & Packaging
India ..................................
Akar Limited ..........................
Apl Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. ..
Artesign Impex ......................
Arun Art Printers Pvt. Ltd. ....
Aryan Worldwide ..................
Bafna Exports .......................
Cargomar Pvt. Ltd. ...............
Cello International Pvt. Ltd.
(M/S Cello Paper Products) ..................................
Corporate Stationery Pvt.
Ltd. ....................................
Crane Worldwide Logistics
Ind Pvt. ..............................
Creative Divya ......................
D.D International ...................
Exel India (Pvt.) Ltd. .............
Exmart International Pvt. Ltd.
Expeditors International
(India) Pvt/Expeditors
Cargo Mgmnt Systems .....
Fatechand Mahendrakumar
FFI International ...................
Freight India Logistics Pvt.
Ltd. ....................................
Gauriputra International ........
International Greetings Pvt.
Ltd. ....................................
Karur K.C.P. Packagings Ltd
Kejriwal Paper Ltd. and
Kejriwal Exports ................
3.36
Manufacturer/Exporter
Lodha Offset Limited ............
M.S. The Bell Match Company ..................................
Magic International Pvt Ltd ...
Mahavideh Foundation .........
Marisa International ..............
Navneet Publications (India)
Ltd. ....................................
Orient Press Ltd. ..................
Paperwise Inc. ......................
Phalada Agro Research
Foundations ......................
Premier Exports ....................
Raghunath Exporters ............
Rajvansh International ..........
SAI Suburi International .......
SAR Transport Systems .......
SDV Intl Logistics Ltd. ..........
Seet Kamal International ......
SGM Paper Products ...........
Shivam Handicrafts ..............
Soham Udyog .......................
Sonal Printers Pvt. Ltd. ........
Super Impex .........................
Swati Growth Funds Ltd. ......
Swift Freight (India) Pvt. Ltd
V&M ......................................
Yash Laminates ....................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent) 1
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
3.36
the issue, (2) a brief summary of the
argument, and (3) a table of authorities.5
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, filed
electronically via IA ACCESS within 30
days after the date of publication of this
notice.6 Requests should contain: (1)
The party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
to be discussed. Issues raised in the
hearing will be limited to those raised
in the respective case briefs. The
Department will issue the final results
of this administrative review, including
the results of its analysis of the issues
raised by the parties in any written
briefs, not later 120 days after the date
of publication of this notice, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rate
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department shall determine, and U.S.
3.36
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
3.36
appropriate entries covered by this
3.36
2 for the Uncooperative
C. AFA Rate
3.36
review. For any individually examined
3.36 Respondents
respondents whose weighted-average
3.36
dumping margin is above de minimis,
Weighted3.36
we will calculate importer-specific ad
average
3.36
valorem duty assessment rates based on
Manufacturer/Exporter
dumping
3.36
margin
the ratio of the total amount of dumping
(percent)
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales to the total entered value of those
3.36 Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co.
Ltd. ....................................
36.27 same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
3.36 AR Printing & Packaging
351.212(b)(1).7 We will instruct CBP to
(India) PVT ........................
36.27 assess antidumping duties on all
3.36 Chitra Exports .......................
36.27 appropriate entries covered by this
3.36 Diki Continental Exports .......
36.27 review when the importer-specific
3.36 Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd.
36.27 assessment rate calculated in the final
3.36
results of this review is above de
3.36
Disclosure and Public Comment
minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). Where
The Department intends to disclose to either the respondent’s weighted3.36 interested parties the calculations
average dumping margin is zero or de
3.36 performed in connection with these
minimis, or an importer-specific
3.36
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
preliminary results within five days of
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
the date of publication of this notice.3
3.36
appropriate entries without regard to
3.36 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
antidumping duties. The final results of
interested parties may submit cases
this review shall be the basis for the
3.36 briefs not later than the later of 30 days
3.36 after the date of publication of this
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise covered by the
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
3.36 raised in the case briefs, may be filed
final results of this review where
not later than five days after the date for applicable.
1 This rate is a weighted average of the weightedfiling case briefs.4 Parties who submit
average dumping margins for the two mandatory
5 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
respondents (weighted by the publicly-ranged U.S.
6 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
proceeding are encouraged to submit
sales quantities from Section A) for the period
7 In these preliminary results, the Department
September 1, 2010, through August 31, 2011. See
with each argument: (1) A statement of
Memorandum to the File, titled, ‘‘Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: Margin for Respondents
Not Selected for Individual Examination,’’ from
Cindy Robinson and Victoria Cho, Case Analysts,
through James Terpstra, Program Manager, dated
concurrent with these results.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:28 Oct 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
2 See
Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the
selection of this rate.
3 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
4 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
applied the assessment rate calculation method
adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2012 / Notices
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by each
respondent for which they did not know
that their merchandise was destined for
the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate
if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
transaction. For a full discussion of this
clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213.
Dated: October 1, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results
of administrative review for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for Riddhi and SAB, and
the remaining 55 companies listed in
the ‘‘Preliminary Result of the Review’’
section, will be the rate established in
the final results of this administrative
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this administrative review but
covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the
original investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 3.91
percent, the all-others rate established
in the investigation.8 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Appendix I
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
International Trade Administration
15:28 Oct 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
[FR Doc. 2012–24814 Filed 10–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A–570–848]
8 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper
Products from the People’s Republic of China;
Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the
People’s Republic of China; and Notice of
Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949
(September 28, 2006).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
a. Selection of Respondents for Individual
Examination
b. Requests for Information
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Methodology
a. Fair Value Comparisons
b. Export Price
c. Normal Value
i. Selection of Comparison Market
ii. Product Comparisons
iii. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
iv. Level of Trade
v. Date of Sale
vi. Cost of Production Analysis
1. Calculation of COP
2. Test of Comparison Market Prices and
COP
3. Results of COP Test
vii. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Constructed Value
d. Rate for Non-Selected Companies
e. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences
i. Uncooperative Respondents
ii. Selection of AFA Rate
f. Currency Conversion
Recommendation
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From
the People’s Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2010–2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61383
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on freshwater
crawfish tail meat from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). The period of
review (POR) is September 1, 2010,
through August 31, 2011. The review
covers the following producers/
exporters of the subject merchandise,
Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. (Xiping
Opeck), Yancheng Hi-King Agriculture
Developing Co., Ltd., (Hi-King
Agriculture) and China Kingdom
(Beijing) Import & Export Co., Ltd
(China Kingdom). We have
preliminarily determined that Hi-King
Agriculture sold subject merchandise at
less than normal value during the
period of review and that Xining Opeck
and China Kingdom have made sales in
the United States at prices not below
normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3477, and (202)
482–1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is freshwater crawfish tail meat. The
product is currently classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) under item
numbers 1605.40.10.10 and
1605.40.10.90. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes
only, the written product description,
available in Freshwater Crawfish Tail
Meat from the People’s Republic of
China: Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 71 FR 7013 (February 10, 2006),
remains dispositive.
Nature of Transactions Pertaining to
the Entries Under Review With Respect
to Xiping Opeck
Although we have calculated a margin
for Xiping Opeck for purposes of the
preliminary results, we require
additional information in order to
accurately assess the nature of the
transactions pertaining to entries under
review with respect to Xiping Opeck.
For further details on our analysis,
please see the memorandum from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61381-61383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24814]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2010-2011
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the
Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on certain lined paper products
(CLPP) from India. The period of review is September 1, 2010, through
August 31, 2011 and the review covers 57 producers/exporters of the
subject merchandise. We have preliminarily found that sales of the
subject merchandise have been made at prices below normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Robinson or James Terpstra, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3797
or (202) 482-3965, respectively.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is certain lined paper
products. The merchandise subject to this order is currently classified
under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheadings: 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040,
4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020,
4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and
4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written product description, available in
Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India,
Indonesia and the People's Republic of China, 71 FR 56949 (September
28, 2006), remains dispositive.
Methodology
The Department has conducted this review in accordance with Section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export
prices and constructed export prices have been calculated in accordance
with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance
with section 773 of the Act. In making these findings, we have relied,
in part, on facts available and because one or more respondents did not
act to the best of their ability to respond to the Department's
requests for information, we have drawn an adverse inference in
selecting from among the facts otherwise available. See sections 776(a)
and (b) of the Act. In accordance with section 773(b) of the Act, we
disregarded the below-cost sales of Riddhi in the most recent
administrative review of this company completed before the initiation
of this review. With regard to SAB, petitioners filed an allegation
demonstrating that SAB made sales below the cost of production.
Therefore, we have reasonable grounds to believe or suspect that
Riddhi's and SAB's sales of the foreign like product under
consideration for the determination of normal value in this review may
have been made at prices below the cost of production (COP) as provided
by section 773(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act. Accordingly, pursuant to
section 773(b)(1) of the Act, we have conducted a COP analysis of
Riddhi's and SAB's sales in India in this review. Based on this test,
we disregarded certain sales made by Riddhi and SAB in their respective
comparison markets which were made at below-cost prices.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, please see the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Certain Lined Paper Products from India''
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with these
results and hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Import Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit (CRU), room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
[[Page 61382]]
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the
following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period
September 1, 2010, through August 31, 2011:
A. Calculated Rate for the Two Mandatory Companies
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riddhi Enterprises, Ltd................................. 3.86
SAB International....................................... 2.30
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Rate for the Non-Selected, Cooperative Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This rate is a weighted average of the weighted-average
dumping margins for the two mandatory respondents (weighted by the
publicly-ranged U.S. sales quantities from Section A) for the period
September 1, 2010, through August 31, 2011. See Memorandum to the
File, titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Margin for
Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination,'' from Cindy
Robinson and Victoria Cho, Case Analysts, through James Terpstra,
Program Manager, dated concurrent with these results.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/Exporter dumping
margin
(percent) \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abhinav Paper Products Pvt Ltd.......................... 3.36
American Scholar, Inc. and/or I-Scholar................. 3.36
A R Printing & Packaging India.......................... 3.36
Akar Limited............................................ 3.36
Apl Logistics India Pvt. Ltd............................ 3.36
Artesign Impex.......................................... 3.36
Arun Art Printers Pvt. Ltd.............................. 3.36
Aryan Worldwide......................................... 3.36
Bafna Exports........................................... 3.36
Cargomar Pvt. Ltd....................................... 3.36
Cello International Pvt. Ltd. (M/S Cello Paper Products) 3.36
Corporate Stationery Pvt. Ltd........................... 3.36
Crane Worldwide Logistics Ind Pvt....................... 3.36
Creative Divya.......................................... 3.36
D.D International....................................... 3.36
Exel India (Pvt.) Ltd................................... 3.36
Exmart International Pvt. Ltd........................... 3.36
Expeditors International (India) Pvt/Expeditors Cargo 3.36
Mgmnt Systems..........................................
Fatechand Mahendrakumar................................. 3.36
FFI International....................................... 3.36
Freight India Logistics Pvt. Ltd........................ 3.36
Gauriputra International................................ 3.36
International Greetings Pvt. Ltd........................ 3.36
Karur K.C.P. Packagings Ltd............................. 3.36
Kejriwal Paper Ltd. and Kejriwal Exports................ 3.36
Lodha Offset Limited.................................... 3.36
M.S. The Bell Match Company............................. 3.36
Magic International Pvt Ltd............................. 3.36
Mahavideh Foundation.................................... 3.36
Marisa International.................................... 3.36
Navneet Publications (India) Ltd........................ 3.36
Orient Press Ltd........................................ 3.36
Paperwise Inc........................................... 3.36
Phalada Agro Research Foundations....................... 3.36
Premier Exports......................................... 3.36
Raghunath Exporters..................................... 3.36
Rajvansh International.................................. 3.36
SAI Suburi International................................ 3.36
SAR Transport Systems................................... 3.36
SDV Intl Logistics Ltd.................................. 3.36
Seet Kamal International................................ 3.36
SGM Paper Products...................................... 3.36
Shivam Handicrafts...................................... 3.36
Soham Udyog............................................. 3.36
Sonal Printers Pvt. Ltd................................. 3.36
Super Impex............................................. 3.36
Swati Growth Funds Ltd.................................. 3.36
Swift Freight (India) Pvt. Ltd.......................... 3.36
V&M..................................................... 3.36
Yash Laminates.......................................... 3.36
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. AFA Rate \2\ for the Uncooperative Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the selection of
this rate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co. Ltd........................... 36.27
AR Printing & Packaging (India) PVT..................... 36.27
Chitra Exports.......................................... 36.27
Diki Continental Exports................................ 36.27
Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd............................. 36.27
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to interested parties the
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results
within five days of the date of publication of this notice.\3\ Pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs not
later than the later of 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs,
may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case
briefs.\4\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement
of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of
authorities.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
filed electronically via IA ACCESS within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.\6\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants;
and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the
hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs.
The Department will issue the final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised by
the parties in any written briefs, not later 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rate
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For any
individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin
is above de minimis, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem
duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value
of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\7\ We will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate
calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis
(i.e., 0.50 percent). Where either the respondent's weighted-average
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment
of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final
results of this review where applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 61383]]
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which they
did not know that their merchandise was destined for the United States.
In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries
at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this
clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of
the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final
results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)
of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Riddhi and SAB, and the
remaining 55 companies listed in the ``Preliminary Result of the
Review'' section, will be the rate established in the final results of
this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review
but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4)
the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 3.91 percent, the all-others rate established in the
investigation.\8\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: October 1, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
a. Selection of Respondents for Individual Examination
b. Requests for Information
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Methodology
a. Fair Value Comparisons
b. Export Price
c. Normal Value
i. Selection of Comparison Market
ii. Product Comparisons
iii. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market
Prices
iv. Level of Trade
v. Date of Sale
vi. Cost of Production Analysis
1. Calculation of COP
2. Test of Comparison Market Prices and COP
3. Results of COP Test
vii. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Constructed Value
d. Rate for Non-Selected Companies
e. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences
i. Uncooperative Respondents
ii. Selection of AFA Rate
f. Currency Conversion
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2012-24814 Filed 10-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
