Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 59987-59989 [2012-24055]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2012 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES found at: http://ows.doleta.gov/ unemploy/claims_arch.asp. The following changes have occurred since the publication of the last notice regarding this state’s EB and EUC08 trigger status: • Based on data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on May 18, 2012, New York no longer met one of the criteria to remain ‘‘on’’ in EB, i.e., having their current three month average, seasonally adjusted total unemployment rate be at least 110 percent of one of the rates from a comparable period in one of the three prior years. This triggered New York ‘‘off’’ in the EB Program and the end of the payable period was the week ending June 10, 2012. New York has served the full 13 week ‘‘off’’ period on September 9, 2012. Given that the trigger rate in New York is currently at 8.9 percent, one look-back is at 110 percent, and the 13 week mandatory ‘‘off’’ period has concluded, New York meets the criteria to resume a High Unemployment Period in the EB Program. This payable period started with the week beginning September 10, 2012, and the maximum potential entitlement for the EB Program in New York is 20 weeks. • In New York, where weeks end on a Sunday, a 13 week mandatory ‘‘on’’ period began for Tier 4 of the EUC08 Program on June 4, 2012. This mandatory 13-week ‘‘on’’ period concluded on September 2, 2012. Because the current trigger rate for New York is 8.9 percent, below the 9.0 percent threshold to remain on in Tier 4, New York has triggered ‘‘off’’ Tier 4 of the EUC08 Program and concluded an eligibility period in Tier 4 on September 2, 2012. Claimants in New York exhausting Tier 3 after September 2, 2012, can no longer establish Tier 4 eligibility. Information for Claimants The duration of benefits payable in the EUC08 Program, and the terms and conditions under which they are payable, are governed by public laws 110–252, 110–449, 111–5, 111–92, 111– 118, 111–144, 111–157, 111–205, 111– 312, and 112–96, and the operating instructions issued to the states by the Department. The duration of benefits payable in the EB Program, and the terms and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the FederalState Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and the operating instructions issued to the states by the Department. In the case of a state beginning or concluding a payable period in EB or EUC08, the State Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of any change VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:48 Sep 28, 2012 Jkt 226001 in potential entitlement to each individual who could establish, or had established, eligibility for benefits (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1) and (c)(4)). Persons who believe they may be entitled to benefits in the EB or EUC08 Programs, or who wish to inquire about their rights under these programs, should contact their State Workforce Agency. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Unemployment Insurance, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Frances Perkins Bldg. Room S–4524, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693–3008 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email: gibbons. scott@dol.gov. Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of September 2012. Jane Oates, Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training. [FR Doc. 2012–24085 Filed 9–28–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of September 10, 2012 through September 14, 2012. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 59987 produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 59988 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2012 / Notices workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in TA–W No. 81,878 ............................ 81,881 ............................ paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the Subject firm International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. Location Impact date HARSCO Metals, RG Steel Warren LLC .............. Warren, OH ............................................ APAC Customer Services, Inc., Expert Global So- Greensboro, NC ..................................... lutions, Inc., formerly known as NCO Group, Inc. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or December 11, 2011. July 26, 2011. services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 81,787 ............................ CSR Technology, Inc., fka Zoran Corporation, CSR PLC, Proresources. Crimzon Rose, Inc., LFUSA, Quality Assurance Department, Crimzon Rose Int’l and IDS, VPI, Inc. Transform Manufacturing, LLC, Transform Holdings, Adecco USA, Kelly Services, Micron Technology, etc. Transform Manufacturing, LLC, Transform Holdings, Adecco USA, Kelly Services, Micron Technology, etc. Shop Vac Corporation, Keystone Staffing, Spherion and Manpower. Sihi Pumps, Inc., Sihi Groups BV, EGW, Accountemps and Advantage Staffing. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Operations/Commercial Markets/Group, Benefits/ Front, etc. New CIDC Delaware Corporation, Betclic Everest Group, Independent Contractor, Qualitest and SQA. Artisans, Inc ........................................................... Fremont-Rideout Health Group, Medical Transcription Department, Now dba Mediscribes, Inc., Off-Site Workers. Sunnyvale, CA ....................................... July 9, 2011. West Warwick, RI .................................. July 18, 2011. Nampa, ID .............................................. August 2, 2011. Boise, ID ................................................ August 2, 2011. Williamsport, PA ..................................... August 3, 2011. Grand Island, NY ................................... July 31, 2011. Windsor, CT ........................................... August 6, 2011. Cambridge, MA ...................................... August 6, 2011. Glen Flora, WI ........................................ Marysville, CA ........................................ September 2, 2012. August 18, 2011. 81,813 ............................ 81,847 ............................ 81,847A .......................... 81,854 ............................ 81,865 ............................ mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 81,870 ............................ 81,884 ............................ 81,890 ............................ 81,912 ............................ VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:48 Sep 28, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM Impact date 01OCN1 59989 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2012 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 81,913 ............................ EMD Millipore Corporation, Bioscience Division, Merck KGAA, Manpower Group. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC, Cincinnati Bell, Call Center Operations, Belcan and Staffmark. The Evercare Company, Global Personnel Solutions. The Evercare Company ......................................... Atmel Corporation, Customer Service Representatives Division. The Miller Company ............................................... Phillipsburg, NJ ...................................... August 23, 2011. Cincinnati, OH ........................................ August 21, 2011. Waynesboro, GA .................................... August 23, 2011. Alpharetta, GA ....................................... Colorado Springs, CO ............................ August 23, 2011. August 31, 2011. Meriden, CT ........................................... September 4, 2011. 81,922 ............................ 81,932 ............................ 81,932A .......................... 81,936 ............................ 81,939 ............................ Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or TA–W No. Subject firm 81,863 ......................... Industrial Machine & Welding ...................... The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) Subject firm 81,741 ......................... International Business Machines (IBM), So Delivery, Service Management, (07) IBM Global Services. Decisionone Corporation, Glodyne Technoserve, Decisionone Corp., Insource, Dysis and Smartsource. Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated, QDT Department. Dated: September 21, 2012. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2012–24055 Filed 9–28–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:13 Sep 28, 2012 Jkt 226001 Devon, PA because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners. Location FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Employment and Training Administration Labor Surplus Area Classification Under Executive Orders Employment and Training Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The purpose of this notice is to announce the annual list of labor surplus areas for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. DATES: Effective Date: The annual list of labor surplus areas is effective October 1, 2012, for all states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. SUMMARY: Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Impact date Langhorne, PA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PO 00000 Impact date Tulsa, OK Subject firm 81,872 ......................... mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES TA–W No. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of September 10, 2012 through September 14, 2012. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/ taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 365–6822. country) of section 222 have not been met. Location on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and Impact date Farmington, MO (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. Location TA–W No. 81,794 ......................... Impact date Sfmt 4703 Samuel Wright, Office of Workforce Investment, Employment and Training Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room S–4231, Washington, DC 20210. Telephone: (202) 693–2870 (This is not a toll-free number). The Department of Labor’s regulations implementing Executive Orders 12073 and 10582 are set forth at 20 CFR Part 654, Subpart A. These regulations require the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) to classify jurisdictions as labor surplus areas pursuant to the criteria specified in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 190 (Monday, October 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59987-59989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
September 10, 2012 through September 14, 2012.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased 
absolutely; and
    (3) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive 
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have 
increased;
    (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are 
directly incorporated, have increased;
    (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more 
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or 
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more 
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
    (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have 
increased; and
    (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the 
sales or production of such firm; or
    II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign 
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or 
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
    (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the 
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly 
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
    (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' 
separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public 
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to 
become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services 
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such 
agency; and
    (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such

[[Page 59988]]

workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of 
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or 
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for 
such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described 
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or 
threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade 
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply 
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
    (1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the 
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an 
investigation resulting in--
    (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat 
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
    (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat 
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
    (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat 
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
    (2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the 
date on which--
    (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the 
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to 
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is 
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
    (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in 
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
    (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the 
workers' firm within--
    (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
    (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding 
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            TA-W No.                    Subject firm              Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,878..........................  HARSCO Metals, RG Steel   Warren, OH..........  December 11, 2011.
                                   Warren LLC.
81,881..........................  APAC Customer Services,   Greensboro, NC......  July 26, 2011.
                                   Inc., Expert Global
                                   Solutions, Inc.,
                                   formerly known as NCO
                                   Group, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act 
have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            TA-W No.                    Subject firm              Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,787..........................  CSR Technology, Inc.,     Sunnyvale, CA.......  July 9, 2011.
                                   fka Zoran Corporation,
                                   CSR PLC, Proresources.
81,813..........................  Crimzon Rose, Inc.,       West Warwick, RI....  July 18, 2011.
                                   LFUSA, Quality
                                   Assurance Department,
                                   Crimzon Rose Int'l and
                                   IDS, VPI, Inc.
81,847..........................  Transform Manufacturing,  Nampa, ID...........  August 2, 2011.
                                   LLC, Transform
                                   Holdings, Adecco USA,
                                   Kelly Services, Micron
                                   Technology, etc.
81,847A.........................  Transform Manufacturing,  Boise, ID...........  August 2, 2011.
                                   LLC, Transform
                                   Holdings, Adecco USA,
                                   Kelly Services, Micron
                                   Technology, etc.
81,854..........................  Shop Vac Corporation,     Williamsport, PA....  August 3, 2011.
                                   Keystone Staffing,
                                   Spherion and Manpower.
81,865..........................  Sihi Pumps, Inc., Sihi    Grand Island, NY....  July 31, 2011.
                                   Groups BV, EGW,
                                   Accountemps and
                                   Advantage Staffing.
81,870..........................  Hartford Financial        Windsor, CT.........  August 6, 2011.
                                   Services Group, Inc.,
                                   Operations/Commercial
                                   Markets/Group, Benefits/
                                   Front, etc.
81,884..........................  New CIDC Delaware         Cambridge, MA.......  August 6, 2011.
                                   Corporation, Betclic
                                   Everest Group,
                                   Independent Contractor,
                                   Qualitest and SQA.
81,890..........................  Artisans, Inc...........  Glen Flora, WI......  September 2, 2012.
81,912..........................  Fremont-Rideout Health    Marysville, CA......  August 18, 2011.
                                   Group, Medical
                                   Transcription
                                   Department, Now dba
                                   Mediscribes, Inc., Off-
                                   Site Workers.

[[Page 59989]]

 
81,913..........................  EMD Millipore             Phillipsburg, NJ....  August 23, 2011.
                                   Corporation, Bioscience
                                   Division, Merck KGAA,
                                   Manpower Group.
81,922..........................  Cincinnati Bell           Cincinnati, OH......  August 21, 2011.
                                   Telephone Company, LLC,
                                   Cincinnati Bell, Call
                                   Center Operations,
                                   Belcan and Staffmark.
81,932..........................  The Evercare Company,     Waynesboro, GA......  August 23, 2011.
                                   Global Personnel
                                   Solutions.
81,932A.........................  The Evercare Company....  Alpharetta, GA......  August 23, 2011.
81,936..........................  Atmel Corporation,        Colorado Springs, CO  August 31, 2011.
                                   Customer Service
                                   Representatives
                                   Division.
81,939..........................  The Miller Company......  Meriden, CT.........  September 4, 2011.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph 
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of 
separation) of section 222 has not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              TA-W No.                       Subject firm                Location               Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,863.............................  Industrial Machine &         Farmington, MO          ......................
                                      Welding.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs 
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 
services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              TA-W No.                       Subject firm                Location               Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,741.............................  International Business       Tulsa, OK               ......................
                                      Machines (IBM), So
                                      Delivery, Service
                                      Management, (07) IBM
                                      Global Services.
81,794.............................  Decisionone Corporation,     Devon, PA               ......................
                                      Glodyne Technoserve,
                                      Decisionone Corp.,
                                      Insource, Dysis and
                                      Smartsource.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register 
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act 
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these 
petitions.
    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under 
petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              TA-W No.                       Subject firm                Location               Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,872.............................  Sykes Enterprises,           Langhorne, PA           ......................
                                      Incorporated, QDT
                                      Department.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the period of September 10, 2012 through September 14, 2012. 
These determinations are available on the Department's Web site 
tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of 
determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance 
toll free at 888-365-6822.

    Dated: September 21, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-24055 Filed 9-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P