Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to Small Order Preference Priority Overlay, 59444-59446 [2012-23764]
Download as PDF
59444
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2012 / Notices
person with respect to access to services
offered by the Exchange. In particular,
the Exchange believes that the proposed
amended fees should not deter listed
issuers from availing [sic] of their due
process rights to appeal Exchange
delisting determinations because the
increased fees will still be set a level
that will be affordable for listed
companies.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 9 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 10
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by NYSE
MKT.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–45. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2012–45 and should be
submitted on or before October 18,
2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
Electronic Comments
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[FR Doc. 2012–23766 Filed 9–26–12; 8:45 am]
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–45 on the
subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67903; File No. SR–CBOE–
2012–082]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to Small Order
Preference Priority Overlay
September 21, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 12, 2012, the Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated the proposal as
a ‘‘non-controversial’’ proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend
Rules 6.45A, Priority and Allocation of
Equity Option Trades on the CBOE
Hybrid System, and 6.45B, Priority and
Allocation of Trades in Index Options
and Options on ETFs on the CBOE
Hybrid System, to expand on the
description of the existing operation of
the small order preference priority
overlay. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site (www.cboe.org/Legal), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those
statements may be examined at the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
10 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Sep 26, 2012
11 17
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2012 / Notices
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
CBOE Rules 6.45A and 6.45B set
forth, among other things, the manner in
which electronic Hybrid System trades
in options are allocated. Paragraph (a) of
each rule essentially governs how
incoming orders received electronically
by the Exchange are electronically
executed against interest in the CBOE
quote. Paragraph (a) of each rule
currently provides a ‘‘menu’’ of
matching algorithms to choose from
when executing incoming electronic
orders. The menu format allows the
Exchange to utilize different matching
algorithms on a class-by-class basis. The
menu includes, among other choices,
the ultimate matching algorithm
(‘‘UMA’’), as well as price-time and prorata priority matching algorithms with
additional priority overlays. The
priority overlays for price-time and prorata currently include: public customer
priority for public customer orders
resting on the Hybrid System,
participation entitlements for certain
qualifying market-makers. Additional
priority overlays for UMA, price-time
and pro-rata include the small order
preference and a market turner priority
(for participants that are first to improve
CBOE’s disseminated quote). These
overlays are optional.
If the small order priority overlay is
in effect for an option class, then the
following applies:
• Orders for five (5) contracts or fewer
will be executed first by the Designated
Primary Market-Maker (‘‘DPM’’) or Lead
Market-Maker (‘‘LMM’’), as applicable,
that is appointed to the option class;
provided however, that on a quarterly
basis the Exchange evaluates what
percentage of the volume executed on
the Exchange (excluding volume
resulting from the execution of orders in
AIM (see CBOE Rule 6.74A, Automated
Improvement Mechanism (‘‘AIM’’)) is
comprised of orders for five (5) contracts
or fewer executed by DPMs and LMMs,
and will reduce the size of the orders
included in this provision if such
percentage is over forty percent (40%).
• This procedure only applies to the
allocation of executions among noncustomer orders and market maker
quotes existing in the EBook at the time
the order is received by the Exchange.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Sep 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
No market participant is allocated any
portion of an execution unless it has an
existing interest at the execution price.
Moreover, no market participant can
execute a greater number of contracts
than is associated with the price of its
existing interest. Accordingly, the small
order preference contained in this
allocation procedure is not a guarantee;
the DPM or LMM, as applicable, (i) must
be quoting at the execution price to
receive an allocation of any size, and (ii)
cannot execute a greater number of
contracts than the size that is associated
with its quote.
• If a Preferred Market-Maker (see
CBOE Rule 8.13, Preferred MarketMaker Program) is not quoting at a price
equal to the national best bid or offer
(‘‘NBBO’’) at the time a preferred order
is received, the allocation procedure for
small orders described above shall be
applied to the execution of the preferred
order. If a Preferred Market Maker is
quoting at the NBBO at the time the
preferred order is received, the
allocation procedure that is generally
applicable for all other sized orders
contained in subparagraphs (a)(i) and
(ii) of Rules 6.45A or 6.45B, as
applicable, is applied to the execution
of the preferred order (e.g., if the default
matching algorithm is price-time with a
public customer and participation
entitlement overlay, the order will
execution [sic] first against any public
customer orders, then the Preferred
Market-Maker would receive its
participation entitlement, then the
remaining balance would be allocated
on a price-time basis).
• The small order priority overlay is
only be [sic] applicable to automatic
executions and is not be [sic] applicable
to any electronic auctions.5
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to expand on the text
contained in subparagraphs (a)(iii) of
Rules 6.45A and 6.45B to simply make
it clearer that, in the event an order for
five contracts or fewer is received when
there is a Preferred Market-Maker
quoting at a price equal to the NBBO at
the time a preferred order is received,
any Market Turner priority overlay
status would not be applied. Currently
the rule text does not include this level
of detail,6 so the Exchange is proposing
5 In addition to AIM, CBOE has various electronic
auctions that are described under Rules 6.13A,
Simple Auction Liaison (‘‘SAL’’), 6.14A, Hybrid
Agency Liaison (HAL), and 6.74B, Solicitation
Auction Mechanism (‘‘AIM SAM’’). Each of these
auctions generally allocates executions pursuant to
the matching algorithm in effect for the options
class with certain exceptions noted in the
respective rules.
6 The rule text currently indicates that, ‘‘[i]f a
Preferred Market Maker is quoting at the NBBO at
the time the preferred order is received, the
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59445
to include this information within the
rule to provide additional clarity on the
existing operation of the small order
preference overlay. Specifically, as
revised, the text would provide that, in
the event an order for five contracts or
fewer is received when there is a
Preferred Market-Maker quoting at a
price equal to the NBBO at the time a
preferred order is received, the
allocation procedure contained in
subparagraphs (a)(i) and (ii) of Rules
6.45A or 6.45B, as applicable, orders
shall be applied to the execution of the
preferred order (as the rule text already
provides) and that any Market Turner
priority overlay status (which is
described in subparagraph (a)(iii)(2) of
Rules 6.45A or 6.45B, as applicable)
shall not be applied to that execution.
The operation of the small order
priority overlay described above is part
of CBOE’s careful balancing of the
rewards and obligations that pertain to
each of the Exchange’s classes of
memberships. This balancing is part of
the overall market structure that is
designed to encourage vigorous price
competition between Market-Makers
(including DPMs, LMMs and Preferred
Market-Makers) on the Exchange, as
well as maximize the benefits of price
competition resulting from the entry of
customer and non-customer orders,
while encouraging participants to
provide market depth. The Exchange
believes the small order priority overlay,
which includes priority participation
rights for DPMs and LMMs or Preferred
Market-Makers (as applicable) over noncustomer orders and market maker
quotes only when the DPM/LMM or
Preferred Market-Maker (as applicable)
is quoting at the best price, strikes the
appropriate balance within its market
and maximizes the benefits of an
electronic market for all participants. In
that regard, the Exchange believes that
allowing the Preferred Market-Maker
participation entitlement to take
precedence over any otherwise
applicable Market Turner allocation (in
the limited scenario where a preferred
order for five contracts or fewer is
received when there is a Preferred
Market-Maker quoting at a price equal to
the NBBO at the time the preferred
order is received) strikes the appropriate
balance within its market and
allocation procedure contained in subparagraphs (i)
or (ii), as applicable, shall be applied.’’
Subparagraphs (i) and (ii) of Rules 6.45A and 6.45B
describe the UMA, price-time, and pro-rata priority
allocation algorithms (as well as the additional
priority overlays applicable to the respective
allocation algorithms). Subparagraph (iii) of Rules
6.45A and 6.45B describe the additional priority
overlays applicable to all allocation methodologies,
which overlays include the small order preference
overlay and the Market Turner overlay.
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
59446
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2012 / Notices
consistent [sic] the protection of
investors and the public interest.
2. Statutory Basis
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
maximizes the benefits of an electronic
market for all participants. In particular,
the application of the Preferred MarketMaker participation entitlement under
the small order preference priority
overlay can contribute to market quality
to the extent that it acts as an incentive
to attract and retain Market-Maker
participation on CBOE and, given the
small order size and NBBO quoting
requirement that are conditions to
receiving the preference, CBOE believes
that applying small order preference
over Market Turner priority for these
types of small orders is appropriate and
consistent [sic] the protection of
investors and the public interest.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act 7 in general and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act 8 in particular in that it should
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, serve to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and protect investors and the
public interest. In particular, the
Exchange believes that including the
additional detail within the rules should
provide additional clarity and avoid any
confusion on the operation of the small
order preference priority overlay in a
class where the Market Turner priority
overlay is also in effect. The Exchange
also believes that the provision allowing
the Preferred Market-Maker
participation entitlement to take
precedence over any otherwise
applicable Market Turner allocation (in
the limited scenario where a preferred
order for five contracts or fewer is
received when there is a Preferred
Market-Maker quoting at a price equal to
the NBBO at the time a preferred order
is received) strikes the appropriate
balance within its market and
maximizes the benefits of an electronic
market for all participants. In particular,
the application of the Preferred MarketMaker participation entitlement under
the small order preference priority
overlay can contribute to market quality
to the extent that it acts as an incentive
to attract and retain Market-Maker
participation on CBOE and, given the
small order size and NBBO quoting
requirement that are conditions to
receiving the preference, CBOE believes
that applying small order preference
over Market Turner priority for these
types of small orders is appropriate and
7 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Sep 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposal.
Because the foregoing rule does not (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
for 30 days from the date on which it
was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, provided that the selfregulatory organization has given the
Commission written notice of its intent
to file the proposed rule change at least
five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or
such shorter time as designated by the
Commission, the proposed rule change
has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 9 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.10 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). As required under Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission.
10 17
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2012–082 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2012–082. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal offices of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2012–082, and should be submitted on
or before October 18, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–23764 Filed 9–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
11 17
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 188 (Thursday, September 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59444-59446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23764]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-67903; File No. SR-CBOE-2012-082]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to Small Order Preference Priority Overlay
September 21, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 12, 2012, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of
the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend Rules 6.45A, Priority and
Allocation of Equity Option Trades on the CBOE Hybrid System, and
6.45B, Priority and Allocation of Trades in Index Options and Options
on ETFs on the CBOE Hybrid System, to expand on the description of the
existing operation of the small order preference priority overlay. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the
[[Page 59445]]
places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts
of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
CBOE Rules 6.45A and 6.45B set forth, among other things, the
manner in which electronic Hybrid System trades in options are
allocated. Paragraph (a) of each rule essentially governs how incoming
orders received electronically by the Exchange are electronically
executed against interest in the CBOE quote. Paragraph (a) of each rule
currently provides a ``menu'' of matching algorithms to choose from
when executing incoming electronic orders. The menu format allows the
Exchange to utilize different matching algorithms on a class-by-class
basis. The menu includes, among other choices, the ultimate matching
algorithm (``UMA''), as well as price-time and pro-rata priority
matching algorithms with additional priority overlays. The priority
overlays for price-time and pro-rata currently include: public customer
priority for public customer orders resting on the Hybrid System,
participation entitlements for certain qualifying market-makers.
Additional priority overlays for UMA, price-time and pro-rata include
the small order preference and a market turner priority (for
participants that are first to improve CBOE's disseminated quote).
These overlays are optional.
If the small order priority overlay is in effect for an option
class, then the following applies:
Orders for five (5) contracts or fewer will be executed
first by the Designated Primary Market-Maker (``DPM'') or Lead Market-
Maker (``LMM''), as applicable, that is appointed to the option class;
provided however, that on a quarterly basis the Exchange evaluates what
percentage of the volume executed on the Exchange (excluding volume
resulting from the execution of orders in AIM (see CBOE Rule 6.74A,
Automated Improvement Mechanism (``AIM'')) is comprised of orders for
five (5) contracts or fewer executed by DPMs and LMMs, and will reduce
the size of the orders included in this provision if such percentage is
over forty percent (40%).
This procedure only applies to the allocation of
executions among non-customer orders and market maker quotes existing
in the EBook at the time the order is received by the Exchange. No
market participant is allocated any portion of an execution unless it
has an existing interest at the execution price. Moreover, no market
participant can execute a greater number of contracts than is
associated with the price of its existing interest. Accordingly, the
small order preference contained in this allocation procedure is not a
guarantee; the DPM or LMM, as applicable, (i) must be quoting at the
execution price to receive an allocation of any size, and (ii) cannot
execute a greater number of contracts than the size that is associated
with its quote.
If a Preferred Market-Maker (see CBOE Rule 8.13, Preferred
Market-Maker Program) is not quoting at a price equal to the national
best bid or offer (``NBBO'') at the time a preferred order is received,
the allocation procedure for small orders described above shall be
applied to the execution of the preferred order. If a Preferred Market
Maker is quoting at the NBBO at the time the preferred order is
received, the allocation procedure that is generally applicable for all
other sized orders contained in subparagraphs (a)(i) and (ii) of Rules
6.45A or 6.45B, as applicable, is applied to the execution of the
preferred order (e.g., if the default matching algorithm is price-time
with a public customer and participation entitlement overlay, the order
will execution [sic] first against any public customer orders, then the
Preferred Market-Maker would receive its participation entitlement,
then the remaining balance would be allocated on a price-time basis).
The small order priority overlay is only be [sic]
applicable to automatic executions and is not be [sic] applicable to
any electronic auctions.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ In addition to AIM, CBOE has various electronic auctions
that are described under Rules 6.13A, Simple Auction Liaison
(``SAL''), 6.14A, Hybrid Agency Liaison (HAL), and 6.74B,
Solicitation Auction Mechanism (``AIM SAM''). Each of these auctions
generally allocates executions pursuant to the matching algorithm in
effect for the options class with certain exceptions noted in the
respective rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to expand on the text
contained in subparagraphs (a)(iii) of Rules 6.45A and 6.45B to simply
make it clearer that, in the event an order for five contracts or fewer
is received when there is a Preferred Market-Maker quoting at a price
equal to the NBBO at the time a preferred order is received, any Market
Turner priority overlay status would not be applied. Currently the rule
text does not include this level of detail,\6\ so the Exchange is
proposing to include this information within the rule to provide
additional clarity on the existing operation of the small order
preference overlay. Specifically, as revised, the text would provide
that, in the event an order for five contracts or fewer is received
when there is a Preferred Market-Maker quoting at a price equal to the
NBBO at the time a preferred order is received, the allocation
procedure contained in subparagraphs (a)(i) and (ii) of Rules 6.45A or
6.45B, as applicable, orders shall be applied to the execution of the
preferred order (as the rule text already provides) and that any Market
Turner priority overlay status (which is described in subparagraph
(a)(iii)(2) of Rules 6.45A or 6.45B, as applicable) shall not be
applied to that execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The rule text currently indicates that, ``[i]f a Preferred
Market Maker is quoting at the NBBO at the time the preferred order
is received, the allocation procedure contained in subparagraphs (i)
or (ii), as applicable, shall be applied.'' Subparagraphs (i) and
(ii) of Rules 6.45A and 6.45B describe the UMA, price-time, and pro-
rata priority allocation algorithms (as well as the additional
priority overlays applicable to the respective allocation
algorithms). Subparagraph (iii) of Rules 6.45A and 6.45B describe
the additional priority overlays applicable to all allocation
methodologies, which overlays include the small order preference
overlay and the Market Turner overlay.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The operation of the small order priority overlay described above
is part of CBOE's careful balancing of the rewards and obligations that
pertain to each of the Exchange's classes of memberships. This
balancing is part of the overall market structure that is designed to
encourage vigorous price competition between Market-Makers (including
DPMs, LMMs and Preferred Market-Makers) on the Exchange, as well as
maximize the benefits of price competition resulting from the entry of
customer and non-customer orders, while encouraging participants to
provide market depth. The Exchange believes the small order priority
overlay, which includes priority participation rights for DPMs and LMMs
or Preferred Market-Makers (as applicable) over non-customer orders and
market maker quotes only when the DPM/LMM or Preferred Market-Maker (as
applicable) is quoting at the best price, strikes the appropriate
balance within its market and maximizes the benefits of an electronic
market for all participants. In that regard, the Exchange believes that
allowing the Preferred Market-Maker participation entitlement to take
precedence over any otherwise applicable Market Turner allocation (in
the limited scenario where a preferred order for five contracts or
fewer is received when there is a Preferred Market-Maker quoting at a
price equal to the NBBO at the time the preferred order is received)
strikes the appropriate balance within its market and
[[Page 59446]]
maximizes the benefits of an electronic market for all participants. In
particular, the application of the Preferred Market-Maker participation
entitlement under the small order preference priority overlay can
contribute to market quality to the extent that it acts as an incentive
to attract and retain Market-Maker participation on CBOE and, given the
small order size and NBBO quoting requirement that are conditions to
receiving the preference, CBOE believes that applying small order
preference over Market Turner priority for these types of small orders
is appropriate and consistent [sic] the protection of investors and the
public interest.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act \7\ in general and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \8\ in particular in that it should promote
just and equitable principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and protect investors and the public interest. In
particular, the Exchange believes that including the additional detail
within the rules should provide additional clarity and avoid any
confusion on the operation of the small order preference priority
overlay in a class where the Market Turner priority overlay is also in
effect. The Exchange also believes that the provision allowing the
Preferred Market-Maker participation entitlement to take precedence
over any otherwise applicable Market Turner allocation (in the limited
scenario where a preferred order for five contracts or fewer is
received when there is a Preferred Market-Maker quoting at a price
equal to the NBBO at the time a preferred order is received) strikes
the appropriate balance within its market and maximizes the benefits of
an electronic market for all participants. In particular, the
application of the Preferred Market-Maker participation entitlement
under the small order preference priority overlay can contribute to
market quality to the extent that it acts as an incentive to attract
and retain Market-Maker participation on CBOE and, given the small
order size and NBBO quoting requirement that are conditions to
receiving the preference, CBOE believes that applying small order
preference over Market Turner priority for these types of small orders
is appropriate and consistent [sic] the protection of investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2012-082 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2012-082. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-CBOE-2012-082, and should be submitted on or before
October 18, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-23764 Filed 9-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P