Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37(c) to Provide That the Tracking Order Process Is Available Only for Orders That Are Eligible To Route To an Away Market, 57630-57631 [2012-22916]
Download as PDF
57630
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 18, 2012 / Notices
governance structures that warrant
common treatment of UPREITs for fee
cap purposes.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 15 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 16
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
NYSE.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2012–43 on the
subject line.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2012–43. This file
15 15
16 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Sep 17, 2012
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing will also be available for Web site
viewing and printing at the NYSE’s
principal office and on its Internet Web
site at www.nyse.com. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2012–43 and should be submitted on or
before October 9, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–22964 Filed 9–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67844; File No. SR–
NYSEArca-2012–75]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change Amending
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37(c) to
Provide That the Tracking Order
Process Is Available Only for Orders
That Are Eligible To Route To an Away
Market
Jkt 226001
I. Introduction
On July 11, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37(c) to
specify that only orders that are eligible
to route to an away market would
participate in the Tracking Order
Process. This proposed rule change
would make Rule 7.37(c) consistent
with the manner by which the Exchange
operates the Tracking Order Process.
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37 sets
forth the Order Execution process at the
Exchange. The Tracking Order Process
is the fourth step in the Order Execution
process, and is preceded by the Directed
Order Process, Display Order Process
and Working Order Process.4 Currently,
Rule 7.37(c) states that if an order has
not been executed in its entirety in one
of the processes preceding the Tracking
Order Process, such order will enter the
Tracking Order Process for potential
matching and execution against
Tracking Orders.5 Rule 7.37(c) does not
specify that among the orders that are
not fully executed in the processes
preceding the Tracking Order Process, it
is only those that are eligible to route to
an away market that participate in the
Tracking Order Process. The proposed
rule change would add this
specification to Rule 7.37(c) to make the
rule consistent with the operation of the
Tracking Order Process.
The Exchange also proposes to delete
provisions in current rule 7.37(c) stating
that any portion of an order received
from another market center or market
participant is cancelled immediately,
and an incoming order that is
designated as an ISO does not interact
in the Tracking Order Process.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67490
(July 24, 2012), 77 FR 44702 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37.
5 Tracking Orders are undisplayed, priced round
lot orders that are eligible for execution in the
Tracking Order Process against orders equal to or
less than the aggregate size of the Tracking Order
interest at that price. See NYSE Arca Equities Rule
7.31(f).
2 17
September 12, 2012.
17 17
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 7.37(c) to provide that the Tracking
Order Process is available only for
orders that are eligible to route to an
away market. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on July 30, 2012.3 The
Commission received no comment
letters regarding the proposed rule
change. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 18, 2012 / Notices
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
IV. Conclusion
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSEArca–
2012–75) be, and it hereby is, approved.
6 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
8 The Commission notes that it recently approved
a proposal by EDGA Exchange, Inc. to add a new
order type called the Route Peg Order, which is a
non-displayed limit order that, similar to the
Tracking Order, is eligible to execute against only
routable orders. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 67726 (August 24, 2012), 77 FR 52771
(August 30, 2012) (SR–EDGA–2012–28).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
Jkt 226001
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.6 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,7 which requires,
among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest; and
are not designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers. The
Commission notes that the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change
removes impediments to and perfects
the mechanism of a free and open
market by providing transparency
regarding the type of orders that are
eligible to interact in the Tracking Order
Process and eliminating obsolete rule
text. Based on the Exchange’s
statements, the Commission believes
that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act.8
18:39 Sep 17, 2012
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–22916 Filed 9–17–12; 8:45 am]
According to the Exchange, these
provisions are obviated by the proposed
clarification in Rule 7.37(c) that only
routable order types participate in the
Tracking Order Process.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
57631
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67839; File No. SR–EDGA–
2012–41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Amendments
to the EDGA Exchange, Inc. Fee
Schedule
September 12, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 5, 2012 the EDGA Exchange,
Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
fees and rebates applicable to Members 3
of the Exchange pursuant to EDGA Rule
15.1(a) and (c). All of the changes
described herein are applicable to EDGA
Members. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Internet Web site at https://
www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s
principal office, and at the Public
Reference Room of the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 As defined in Rule 1.5(n).
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to add Flag
RP to the Exchange’s fee schedule for
Non-Displayed Orders that add liquidity
using the Route Peg Order type.4 The
Exchange proposes to assess a charge of
$0.0005 per share for orders that yield
Flag RP. The volume associated with
Flag RP will also count towards the
volume tiers for non-displayed orders
that add liquidity.
As defined in Exchange Rule
11.5(c)(14), a Route Peg Order is a nondisplayed limit order that posts to the
EDGA Book, and thereafter is eligible for
execution at the National Best Bid
(‘‘NBB’’) for buy orders and National
Best Offer (‘‘NBO’’, and together with
the NBB, the ‘‘NBBO’’) for sell orders
against the original size of the routable
orders that are equal to or less than the
original size of the Route Peg Orders.
Route Peg Orders are passive, resting
orders on the EDGA Book and do not
take liquidity. Route Peg Orders may be
entered, cancelled, and cancelled/
replaced prior to and during Regular
Trading Hours.5 Route Peg Orders are
eligible for execution in a given security
during Regular Trading Hours, except
that, even after the commencement of
Regular Trading Hours, Route Peg
Orders are not eligible for execution (1)
in the opening cross, and (2) until such
time that regular session orders in that
security can be posted to the EDGA
Book. A Route Peg Order does not
execute at a price that is inferior to a
Protected Quotation, and is not
permitted to execute if the NBBO is
locked or crossed. Any and all
remaining, unexecuted Route Peg
Orders are cancelled at the conclusion
of Regular Trading Hours.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
the text of Footnote 2 of the fee schedule
to list Flag RP as one of the nondisplayed order types where the volume
associated with Flag RP will count
toward the volume threshold in
Footnote 2.
The Exchange proposes to implement
these amendments to its fee schedule on
September 7, 2012.
10 17
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4 See Securities and Exchange Act Release No.
67726 (August 24, 2012) (SR–EDGA–2012–28).
5 As defined in Rule 1.5(y).
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57630-57631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22916]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-67844; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2012-75]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37(c) to
Provide That the Tracking Order Process Is Available Only for Orders
That Are Eligible To Route To an Away Market
September 12, 2012.
I. Introduction
On July 11, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Arca'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37(c) to provide that the Tracking
Order Process is available only for orders that are eligible to route
to an away market. The proposed rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on July 30, 2012.\3\ The Commission received no
comment letters regarding the proposed rule change. This order approves
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67490 (July 24,
2012), 77 FR 44702 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37(c) to
specify that only orders that are eligible to route to an away market
would participate in the Tracking Order Process. This proposed rule
change would make Rule 7.37(c) consistent with the manner by which the
Exchange operates the Tracking Order Process.
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37 sets forth the Order Execution process
at the Exchange. The Tracking Order Process is the fourth step in the
Order Execution process, and is preceded by the Directed Order Process,
Display Order Process and Working Order Process.\4\ Currently, Rule
7.37(c) states that if an order has not been executed in its entirety
in one of the processes preceding the Tracking Order Process, such
order will enter the Tracking Order Process for potential matching and
execution against Tracking Orders.\5\ Rule 7.37(c) does not specify
that among the orders that are not fully executed in the processes
preceding the Tracking Order Process, it is only those that are
eligible to route to an away market that participate in the Tracking
Order Process. The proposed rule change would add this specification to
Rule 7.37(c) to make the rule consistent with the operation of the
Tracking Order Process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.37.
\5\ Tracking Orders are undisplayed, priced round lot orders
that are eligible for execution in the Tracking Order Process
against orders equal to or less than the aggregate size of the
Tracking Order interest at that price. See NYSE Arca Equities Rule
7.31(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to delete provisions in current rule
7.37(c) stating that any portion of an order received from another
market center or market participant is cancelled immediately, and an
incoming order that is designated as an ISO does not interact in the
Tracking Order Process.
[[Page 57631]]
According to the Exchange, these provisions are obviated by the
proposed clarification in Rule 7.37(c) that only routable order types
participate in the Tracking Order Process.
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\6\
In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ which requires, among
other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest; and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Commission notes that the
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change removes impediments to
and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market by providing
transparency regarding the type of orders that are eligible to interact
in the Tracking Order Process and eliminating obsolete rule text. Based
on the Exchange's statements, the Commission believes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\8\ The Commission notes that it recently approved a proposal by
EDGA Exchange, Inc. to add a new order type called the Route Peg
Order, which is a non-displayed limit order that, similar to the
Tracking Order, is eligible to execute against only routable orders.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67726 (August 24, 2012), 77
FR 52771 (August 30, 2012) (SR-EDGA-2012-28).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEArca-2012-75) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-22916 Filed 9-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P