Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Complex Order Auctions, 57171-57173 [2012-22787]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2012 / Notices
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (h https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2012–112 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2012–112. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2012–112 and should be submitted on
or before October 9, 2012
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:43 Sep 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–22789 Filed 9–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67842; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2012–090]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change to Amend Rule 4626—
Limitation of Liability
September 12, 2012.
On July 23, 2012, The NASDAQ Stock
Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend Exchange Rule 4626—Limitation
of Liability. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on August 1, 2012.3
The Commission received eleven
comment letters on this proposal.4
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act5 provides
that within 45 days of the publication of
notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
10 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67507
(July 26, 2012), 77 FR 45706.
4 See letters to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Commission, from Sis DeMarco, Chief Compliance
Officer, Triad Securities Corp., dated August 20,
2012; Eugene P. Torpey, Chief Compliance Officer,
Vandham Securities Corp., dated August 21, 2012;
John C. Nagel, Managing Director and General
Counsel, Citadel LLC, dated August 21, 2012;
Benjamin Bram, Watermill Institutional Trading
LLC, dated August 22, 2012; Daniel Keegan,
Managing Director, Citigroup Global Markets Inc.,
dated August 22, 2012; Theodore R. Lazo, Managing
Director and Associate General Counsel, Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association, dated
August 22, 2012; Mark Shelton, Group Managing
Director and General Counsel, UBS Securities LLC,
dated August 22, 2012; Andrew J. Entwistle and
Vincent R. Cappucci, Entwistle & Cappucci LLP,
dated August 22, 2012; Douglas G. Thompson,
Michael G. McLellan, and Robert O. Wilson,
Finkelstein Thompson LLP, Christopher Lovell,
Victor E. Stewart, and Fred T. Isquith, Lovell
Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP, Jacob H. Zamansky
and Edward H. Glenn, Zamansky & Associates LLC,
dated August 22, 2012; James J. Angel, Associate
Professor of Finance, Georgetown University,
McDonough School of Business, dated August 23,
2012; and Leonard J. Amoruso, General Counsel,
Knight Capital Group, Inc., dated August 29, 2012.
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57171
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day for this filing
is September 15, 2012. The Commission
is extending this 45-day time period.
The Commission finds it appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider this proposed rule change,
which relates to a voluntary
accommodation policy for claims
arising from systems difficulties that
NASDAQ experienced during the initial
public offering of Facebook, Inc. on May
18, 2012, the comment letters that have
been submitted in connection with this
proposed rule change, and any response
to the comment letters submitted by the
Exchange.
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,6
designates October 30, 2012, as the date
by which the Commission should either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change
(File No. SR–NASDAQ–2012–090).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–22846 Filed 9–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67827; File No. SR–CBOE–
2012–085]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Complex Order Auctions
September 11, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
30, 2012, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
6 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
7 17
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
57172
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2012 / Notices
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposed to amend its
Rules regarding complex order auctions.
The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site (
https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
On a class-by-class basis, the
Exchange may activate the electronic
complex order request for responses
(‘‘RFR’’) auction (‘‘COA’’), which is a
process by which eligible complex
orders 3 are given an opportunity for
price improvement before being routed
to the electronic complex order book
(‘‘COB’’) or once on a PAR workstation.
Rule 6.53C(d) provides that prior to
routing a complex order to the COB or
3 An eligible complex order, referred to in Rule
6.53C as a ‘‘COA-eligible order,’’ means a complex
order that, as determined by the Exchange on a
class-by-class basis, is eligible for a COA
considering the order’s marketability (defined as a
number of ticks away from the current market), size,
complex order type, and complex order origin type
(i.e. non-broker-dealer public customer, brokerdealers that are not Market-Makers or specialists on
an options exchange, and/or Market-Makers or
specialists on an options exchange). All
determinations by the Exchange on COA-eligible
order parameters are announced to Trading Permit
Holders by Regulatory Circular. See Rule
6.53C(d)(i)(2) and Interpretation and Policy .01 to
Rule 6.53C.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:43 Sep 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
once on PAR, eligible complex orders
may be subject to a COA. On receipt of
a COA-eligible order and request from
the Trading Permit Holder representing
the order that it be COA’d, the Exchange
will send an RFR message to all Trading
Permit Holders who have elected to
receive RFR messages.4 The RFR
message identifies the component
series, the size of the COA-eligible order
and any contingencies, but not the side
of the market. Eligible Trading Permit
Holders may then submit responses to
the RFR message (‘‘RFR Responses’’)
during the Response Time Interval.5
Responders to the auction, not
knowing the side of the COA order, may
send RFR Responses on both sides of
the market. The CBOE Hybrid System
(the ‘‘System’’) 6 only considers RFR
Responses on the opposite side of the
COA order. RFR Responses that are on
the same side as the COA order cannot
trade with it and thus are unnecessary,
and as a result, the System
automatically rejects these RFR
Responses.
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules to provide that the RFR message
will identify the side of the market of
the COA-eligible order and to clarify
that RFR Responses must be on the
opposite side of the market of the COA
order. Identification of the side of the
market of the COA order in the RFR
4 See
Rule 6.53C(d)(ii).
Market-Maker with an appointment in the
relevant option class, and each Trading Permit
Holder acting as agent for orders resting at the top
of the COB in the relevant option series, may
submit responses to the RFR message. Alternatively,
the Exchange may determine on a class-by-class
basis to permit COA responses by all Trading
Permit Holders. See Rule 6.53C(d)(iii). A ‘‘Response
Time Interval’’ means the period of time during
which RFR Responses may be entered, the length
of which is determined by the Exchange on a classby-class basis but may not exceed three seconds.
See Rule 6.53C(d)(iii)(2). RFR Response sizes will
be limited to the size of the COA-eligible order for
allocation purposes and may be expressed on a net
price basis in a multiple of the minimum increment
or in a smaller increment that may not be less than
$0.01, as determined by the Exchange on a classby-class basis. RFR responses are not visible other
than by the COA system. See Rule 6.53C(d)(iii)(1).
Rule 6.53C(d)(iv) through (viii) describes the
processing, execution, and routing of COA-eligible
orders, firm quote requirements for COA-eligible
orders, and handling of unrelated complex orders.
6 The System is a trading platform that allows
automatic executions to occur electronically and
open outcry trades to occur on the floor of the
Exchange. To operate in this ‘‘hybrid’’ environment,
the Exchange has a dynamic order handling system
that has the capability to route orders to the trade
engine for automatic execution and book entry, to
Trading Permit Holder and PAR Official
workstations located in the trading crowds for
manual handling, and/or to other order
management terminals generally located in booths
on the trading floor for manual handling. Where an
order is routed for processing by the Exchange order
handling system depends on various parameters
configured by the Exchange and the order entry
firm itself.
5 Each
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
message will eliminate the entry of
unnecessary RFR Responses on the
same side of the market of the COA
order that the System automatically
rejects. The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change will therefore
improve the efficiency of the COA
process by eliminating excess RFR
Responses that can never actually trade
with the COA order. The Exchange
believes that providing this additional
information to Trading Permit Holders
in the RFR message could result in more
meaningful and effective RFR
Responses. RFR Responses that exist at
the end of the Response Time Interval
with respect to COA-eligible orders will
still be firm. The Exchange will
announce the implementation date of
the proposed rule change by Regulatory
Circular to be published no later than 90
days following the effective date. The
implementation date will be no later
than 180 days following the effective
date.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.7 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 8 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts, to remove impediments to and to
perfect the mechanism for a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
In particular, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change protects
investors and is in the public interest
because it will eliminate the submission
of unnecessary RFR Responses on the
same side of the market as a COA order
(which the System rejects because they
cannot trade with the COA order),
which will ultimately make the COA
process more efficient. The Exchange
believes this added efficiency could
lead to more meaningful and
competitive price RFR Responses,
which responses may result in better
prices for customers.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
7 15
8 15
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
17SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2012 / Notices
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
A. By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change; or
B. institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2012–085 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2012–085. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:43 Sep 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2012–085 and should be submitted on
or before October 9, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–22787 Filed 9–14–12; 8:45 am]
57173
The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67828; File No. SR–C2–
2012–030]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Complex Order
Auctions
September 11, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
30, 2012, C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposed to amend its
Rules regarding complex order auctions.
9 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On a class-by-class basis, the
Exchange may activate the electronic
complex order request for responses
(‘‘RFR’’) auction (‘‘COA’’), which is a
process by which eligible complex
orders3 are given an opportunity for
price improvement before being routed
to the complex order book (‘‘COB’’).
Rule 6.13(c) provides that prior to
routing a complex order to the COB,
eligible complex orders may be subject
to a COA. On receipt of a COA-eligible
order and request from the Participant
representing the order that it be
processed through COA, the Exchange
will send an RFR message to all
Participants who have elected to receive
RFR messages.4 The RFR message
identifies the component series, the size
of the COA-eligible order and any
contingencies, but not the side of the
market. Eligible Participants may then
submit responses to the RFR message
3 An eligible complex order, referred to in Rule
6.13 as a ‘‘COA-eligible order,’’ means
acomplex order that, as determined by the
Exchange on a class-by-class basis, is eligible for a
COA considering the order’s marketability (defined
as a number of ticks away from the current market),
size, complex order type, and complex order origin
type (i.e. non-broker-dealer public customer,
broker-dealers that are not Market-Makers or
specialists on an options exchange, and/or MarketMakers or specialists on an options exchange). All
determinations by the Exchange on COA-eligible
order parameters are announced to Trading Permit
Holders by Regulatory Circular. See Rule
6.13(c)(1)(B) and Interpretation and Policy .01 to
Rule 6.13.
4 See Rule 6.13(c)(2).
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 180 (Monday, September 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57171-57173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22787]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-67827; File No. SR-CBOE-2012-085]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Complex Order Auctions
September 11, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 30, 2012, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and
[[Page 57172]]
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposed to amend its Rules regarding complex order
auctions. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
On a class-by-class basis, the Exchange may activate the electronic
complex order request for responses (``RFR'') auction (``COA''), which
is a process by which eligible complex orders \3\ are given an
opportunity for price improvement before being routed to the electronic
complex order book (``COB'') or once on a PAR workstation. Rule
6.53C(d) provides that prior to routing a complex order to the COB or
once on PAR, eligible complex orders may be subject to a COA. On
receipt of a COA-eligible order and request from the Trading Permit
Holder representing the order that it be COA'd, the Exchange will send
an RFR message to all Trading Permit Holders who have elected to
receive RFR messages.\4\ The RFR message identifies the component
series, the size of the COA-eligible order and any contingencies, but
not the side of the market. Eligible Trading Permit Holders may then
submit responses to the RFR message (``RFR Responses'') during the
Response Time Interval.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ An eligible complex order, referred to in Rule 6.53C as a
``COA-eligible order,'' means a complex order that, as determined by
the Exchange on a class-by-class basis, is eligible for a COA
considering the order's marketability (defined as a number of ticks
away from the current market), size, complex order type, and complex
order origin type (i.e. non-broker-dealer public customer, broker-
dealers that are not Market-Makers or specialists on an options
exchange, and/or Market-Makers or specialists on an options
exchange). All determinations by the Exchange on COA-eligible order
parameters are announced to Trading Permit Holders by Regulatory
Circular. See Rule 6.53C(d)(i)(2) and Interpretation and Policy .01
to Rule 6.53C.
\4\ See Rule 6.53C(d)(ii).
\5\ Each Market-Maker with an appointment in the relevant option
class, and each Trading Permit Holder acting as agent for orders
resting at the top of the COB in the relevant option series, may
submit responses to the RFR message. Alternatively, the Exchange may
determine on a class-by-class basis to permit COA responses by all
Trading Permit Holders. See Rule 6.53C(d)(iii). A ``Response Time
Interval'' means the period of time during which RFR Responses may
be entered, the length of which is determined by the Exchange on a
class-by-class basis but may not exceed three seconds. See Rule
6.53C(d)(iii)(2). RFR Response sizes will be limited to the size of
the COA-eligible order for allocation purposes and may be expressed
on a net price basis in a multiple of the minimum increment or in a
smaller increment that may not be less than $0.01, as determined by
the Exchange on a class-by-class basis. RFR responses are not
visible other than by the COA system. See Rule 6.53C(d)(iii)(1).
Rule 6.53C(d)(iv) through (viii) describes the processing,
execution, and routing of COA-eligible orders, firm quote
requirements for COA-eligible orders, and handling of unrelated
complex orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Responders to the auction, not knowing the side of the COA order,
may send RFR Responses on both sides of the market. The CBOE Hybrid
System (the ``System'') \6\ only considers RFR Responses on the
opposite side of the COA order. RFR Responses that are on the same side
as the COA order cannot trade with it and thus are unnecessary, and as
a result, the System automatically rejects these RFR Responses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The System is a trading platform that allows automatic
executions to occur electronically and open outcry trades to occur
on the floor of the Exchange. To operate in this ``hybrid''
environment, the Exchange has a dynamic order handling system that
has the capability to route orders to the trade engine for automatic
execution and book entry, to Trading Permit Holder and PAR Official
workstations located in the trading crowds for manual handling, and/
or to other order management terminals generally located in booths
on the trading floor for manual handling. Where an order is routed
for processing by the Exchange order handling system depends on
various parameters configured by the Exchange and the order entry
firm itself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend its rules to provide that the RFR
message will identify the side of the market of the COA-eligible order
and to clarify that RFR Responses must be on the opposite side of the
market of the COA order. Identification of the side of the market of
the COA order in the RFR message will eliminate the entry of
unnecessary RFR Responses on the same side of the market of the COA
order that the System automatically rejects. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change will therefore improve the efficiency of the
COA process by eliminating excess RFR Responses that can never actually
trade with the COA order. The Exchange believes that providing this
additional information to Trading Permit Holders in the RFR message
could result in more meaningful and effective RFR Responses. RFR
Responses that exist at the end of the Response Time Interval with
respect to COA-eligible orders will still be firm. The Exchange will
announce the implementation date of the proposed rule change by
Regulatory Circular to be published no later than 90 days following the
effective date. The implementation date will be no later than 180 days
following the effective date.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\7\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \8\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove
impediments to and to perfect the mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
protects investors and is in the public interest because it will
eliminate the submission of unnecessary RFR Responses on the same side
of the market as a COA order (which the System rejects because they
cannot trade with the COA order), which will ultimately make the COA
process more efficient. The Exchange believes this added efficiency
could lead to more meaningful and competitive price RFR Responses,
which responses may result in better prices for customers.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
[[Page 57173]]
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
A. By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change; or
B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-CBOE-2012-085 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2012-085. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2012-085 and should be
submitted on or before October 9, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-22787 Filed 9-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P