Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 56871-56873 [2012-22651]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
investigation to determine whether
conditions during the relevant time
period nevertheless supported the
ultimate conclusion of the
determination that the workers and
former workers of Roseburg Forest
Products, Composite Panel Division,
Orangeburg, South Carolina and
Russellville, South Carolina met the
eligibility criteria set forth in the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended (the Act).
The Department obtained new
information regarding the subject firm’s
major declining customers of
particleboard and/or laminated wood
panels and related import data of
particleboard and/or laminated wood
panels (and like or directly competitive
articles) by the subject firm’s customers.
Using the new customer information
and previously-submitted information
from the subject firm regarding
particleboard and/or laminated wood
panels sales and production at Roseburg
Forest Products, Composite Panel
Division, Orangeburg, South Carolina
and Russellville, South Carolina, the
Department conducted another import
analysis for the relevant time period.
The immediate investigation revealed
increased imports (direct and indirect
imports) of particleboard wood panels
by major declining customer(s) of the
subject firm during 2010 from 2009
levels and during partial year 2011 from
the corresponding 2010 period (the
relevant period).
Based on a careful analysis of all
information provided in the immediate
and earlier investigations, the
Department determines that increased
customer imports of articles like or
directly competitive with the
particleboard and/or laminated wood
panels produced at the subject facilities
contributed importantly to worker group
separations at Roseburg Forest Products,
Composite Panel Division, Orangeburg,
South Carolina and Russellville, South
Carolina.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts
obtained in the initial investigation of
the petition referenced as TA–W–80,308
and TA–W–80,308A and the immediate
investigation, I determine, in
accordance with Section 223 of the Act,
19 U.S.C. 2273, that the certification of
workers and former workers of Roseburg
Forest Products, Composite Panel
Division, including on-site leased
workers of Robert Half, Orangeburg,
South Carolina (TA–W–80,308) and
Roseburg Forest Products, Composite
Panel Division, including on-site leased
workers of Robert Half, Russellville,
South Carolina (TA–W–80,308A),
issued on August 12, 2011 and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Sep 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
published in the Federal Register on
September 2, 2011 (76 FR 54796) should
not be terminated. As described in the
certification, I conclude that these
workers, who are/were engaged in
activities related to production of
particleboard and/or laminated wood
panels, have met the worker group
certification criteria under 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a).
Signed in Washington, DC, this 31st day of
August, 2012
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–22649 Filed 9–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of August 27, 2012
through August 31, 2012.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both,
of such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56871
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) The increase in imports
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition
from a foreign country by the workers’
firm of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
56872
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2012 / Notices
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) Either(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied to
the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) An affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) A summary of the report
submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under
section 202(f)(1) with respect to the
affirmative determination described in
paragraph (1)(A) is published in the
Federal Register under section 202(f)(3);
or
(B) Notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally
or partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) The 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1- year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
81,801 ..........
81,801A ........
81,801B ........
Schott Solar CSP, Inc., Schott Solar AG, Manpower Professional .........
Schott Solar PV, Inc., Schott Solar AG, Manpower Professional ...........
Schott Solar PV, Inc., Schott Solar AG, Remote Workers Reporting to
Santa Clara, California.
Mi-Lin Wood Products ..............................................................................
Astar USA, LLC, Including Leased Workers from Avsource and Sogetti
Albuquerque, NM ............................
Albuquerque, NM ............................
Santa Clara, CA ..............................
July 12, 2011.
July 12, 2011.
July 12, 2011.
Paoli, IN ..........................................
Florence, KY ...................................
July 20, 2011.
July 31, 2011.
81,818 ..........
81,849 ..........
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
Impact date
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date
81,842 ..........
81,852 ..........
MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., Southwest ...........................................
Microsemi Corporation, Excluding Testing Services, Incl. Leased Workers from Clearpath, Encore, etc.
Microsemi Corporation, Testing Services Division ..................................
Sabritec, Smiths Group, Mattson Resources and Kimco Financial .........
Robert Half and Advantek, Working On-Site at Sabritec ........................
Sherman, TX ...................................
Lawrence, MA .................................
July 30, 2012.
August 1, 2011.
Lawrence, MA .................................
Irvine, CA ........................................
Irvine, CA ........................................
July 27, 2012.
August 9, 2011.
August 9, 2011.
81,852A ........
81,882 ..........
81,882A ........
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
Subject firm
Location
81,821 ..........
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
TA–W No.
Bonnell Manufacturing, Tredegar Corporation, Formely d/b/a Bon L
Manufacturing, Olsten Staffing.
Kentland, IN ....................................
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Sep 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or
(b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
May 20, 2012.
threat of separation) of section 222 has
not been met.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 179 / Friday, September 14, 2012 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
81,873 ..........
Legacy Custom Plastics, LLC, A–1 Temps .............................................
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i)
Location
Miasa Automotive, LLC ............................................................................
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A)
Location
AFNI, Inc. .................................................................................................
Raytheon, Space and Airborne Systems, Operations, California Manufacturing, etc.
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
Subject firm
81,696 ..........
81,800 ..........
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
on the Department’s Web site, as
Location
SuperValu, Inc., Boise Store Support Center, IT Department .................
workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further
investigation in these cases would serve
no purpose since the petitioning group
of workers cannot be covered by more
than one certification at a time.
Subject firm
81,915 ..........
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of August 27,
2012 through August 31, 2012. These
determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa
search form.cfm under the searchable
listing of determinations or by calling
the Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance toll free at 888–365–6822.
Dated: September 5, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–22651 Filed 9–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Sep 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
Location
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221 (a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
Boise, ID.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
PO 00000
Impact date
Peoria, IL.
El Segundo, CA.
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of
TA–W No.
Impact date
Yorktown, IN.
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
TA–W No.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
services to a foreign country) of section
222 have not been met.
Subject firm
81,824 ..........
Impact date
St. Petersburg, FL.
(decline in sales or production, or both)
and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
TA–W No.
56873
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than September 24, 2012.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than September 24, 2012.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of
September 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56871-56873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22651]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
August 27, 2012 through August 31, 2012.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have
[[Page 56872]]
become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either-
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1- year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,801................... Schott Solar CSP, Inc., Albuquerque, NM......... July 12, 2011.
Schott Solar AG, Manpower
Professional.
81,801A.................. Schott Solar PV, Inc., Schott Albuquerque, NM......... July 12, 2011.
Solar AG, Manpower
Professional.
81,801B.................. Schott Solar PV, Inc., Schott Santa Clara, CA......... July 12, 2011.
Solar AG, Remote Workers
Reporting to Santa Clara,
California.
81,818................... Mi-Lin Wood Products......... Paoli, IN............... July 20, 2011.
81,849................... Astar USA, LLC, Including Florence, KY............ July 31, 2011.
Leased Workers from Avsource
and Sogetti.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,842................... MEMC Electronic Materials, Sherman, TX............. July 30, 2012.
Inc., Southwest.
81,852................... Microsemi Corporation, Lawrence, MA............ August 1, 2011.
Excluding Testing Services,
Incl. Leased Workers from
Clearpath, Encore, etc.
81,852A.................. Microsemi Corporation, Lawrence, MA............ July 27, 2012.
Testing Services Division.
81,882................... Sabritec, Smiths Group, Irvine, CA.............. August 9, 2011.
Mattson Resources and Kimco
Financial.
81,882A.................. Robert Half and Advantek, Irvine, CA.............. August 9, 2011.
Working On-Site at Sabritec.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,821................... Bonnell Manufacturing, Kentland, IN............ May 20, 2012.
Tredegar Corporation,
Formely d/b/a Bon L
Manufacturing, Olsten
Staffing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.
[[Page 56873]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,873................... Legacy Custom Plastics, LLC, St. Petersburg, FL......
A-1 Temps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222
have not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,824................... Miasa Automotive, LLC........ Yorktown, IN............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,696................... AFNI, Inc.................... Peoria, IL..............
81,800................... Raytheon, Space and Airborne El Segundo, CA..........
Systems, Operations,
California Manufacturing,
etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,915................... SuperValu, Inc., Boise Store Boise, ID...............
Support Center, IT
Department.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of August 27, 2012 through August 31, 2012. These
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or
by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-
365-6822.
Dated: September 5, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-22651 Filed 9-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
