Decision That Certain Nonconforming Motor Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation, 55267-55268 [2012-22034]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR part 388.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
Dated: August 28, 2012.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–21985 Filed 9–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0105]
Decision That Certain Nonconforming
Motor Vehicles Are Eligible for
Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Grant of Petitions.
AGENCY:
This document announces
decisions by NHTSA that certain motor
vehicles not originally manufactured to
comply with all applicable Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) are eligible for importation
into the United States because they are
substantially similar to vehicles
originally manufactured for sale in the
United States and certified by their
manufacturers as complying with the
safety standards, and they are capable of
being readily altered to conform to the
standards or because they have safety
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
features that comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable FMVSS.
DATES: These decisions became effective
on the dates specified in Annex A.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Stevens, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and/or sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Where there is no substantially
similar U.S.-certified motor vehicle, 49
U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) permits a
nonconforming motor vehicle to be
admitted into the United States if its
safety features comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable FMVSS based on
destructive test data or such other
evidence as NHTSA decides to be
adequate.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
NHTSA received petitions from
registered importers to decide whether
the vehicles listed in Annex A to this
notice are eligible for importation into
the United States. To afford an
opportunity for public comment,
NHTSA published notice of these
petitions as specified in Annex A. The
reader is referred to those notices for a
thorough description of the petitions.
Comments: No substantive comments
were received in response to the subject
petitions.
NHTSA Decision: Accordingly, on the
basis of the foregoing, NHTSA hereby
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55267
decides that each motor vehicle listed in
Annex A to this notice, which was not
originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable FMVSS, is either
substantially similar to a motor vehicle
manufactured for importation into and/
or sale in the United States, and
certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, as
specified in Annex A, and is capable of
being readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS or has safety features
that comply with, or is capable of being
altered to comply with, all applicable
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards.
Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject
Vehicles: The importer of a vehicle
admissible under any final decision
must indicate on the form HS–7
accompanying entry the appropriate
vehicle eligibility number indicating
that the vehicle is eligible for entry.
Vehicle eligibility numbers assigned to
vehicles admissible under this decision
are specified in Annex A.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A),
(a)(1)(B) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations
of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: August 30, 2012.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
ANNEX A
Nonconforming Motor Vehicles Decided to
be Eligible for Importation
1. Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0181
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1999 Volkswagen
Bora Passenger Car.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified
Vehicles: 1999 Volkswagen New Jetta
Passenger Car.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 5303 (February 2,
2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–540
(effective date August 8, 2012).
2. Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0035
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1999–2006
Toyota Land Cruiser IFS 100 Series
Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles
Manufactured prior to September 1, 2006.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified
Vehicles: 1999–2006 Toyota Land Cruiser IFS
100 Series Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles
Manufactured prior to September 1, 2006.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 20485 (April 4, 2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–539
(effective date July 27, 2012).
3. Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0040
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2006 Left-Hand
Drive Land Rover Range Rover Multipurpose
Passenger Vehicles Manufactured prior to
September 1, 2006.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified
Vehicles: 2006 Left-Hand Drive Land Rover
Range Rover Multipurpose Passenger
Vehicles Manufactured prior to September 1,
2006.
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
55268
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 24264 (April 23, 2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–538
(effective date August 8, 2012).
4. Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0182
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2000–2003
Kawasaki ZR750 Motorcycles.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified
Vehicles: 2000–2003 Kawasaki ZR750
Motorcycles.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 76 FR 82039 (December 29,
2011).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–537
(effective date February 22, 2012).
9. Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0157
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1987–1994
ALPINA Burkard Bovensiepen GmbH B11
Sedan Model Passenger Cars.
Because there are no substantially similar
U.S.-certified version 1987–1994 ALPINA
Burkard Bovensiepen GmbH B11 Sedan
Model Passenger Cars the petitioner sought
import eligibility under 49 U.S.C.
30141(a)(1)(B).
Notice of Petition
Published at: 76 FR 69323 (November 8,
2011).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VCP–48
(effective date December 19, 2011).
[FR Doc. 2012–22034 Filed 9–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
5. Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0158
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2002 Jaguar XJ8
Passenger Cars Manufactured for Sale in the
Kuwaiti Market.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified
Vehicles: 2002 Jaguar XJ8 Passenger Cars.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
Notice of Petition
[Docket No. FD 35666]
Published at: 76 FR 69796 (November 9,
2011).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–536
(effective date December 20, 2011).
Union Pacific Railroad Company—
Acquisition and Operation
Exemption—San Pedro Railroad
Operating Company, LLC
6. Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0113
Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP)
has filed a verified notice of exemption
under: (1) 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(1) to
acquire and operate over San Pedro
Railroad Operating Company, LLC’s
(SPROC) line segments between MP
1040.15 at Curtiss, Ariz., and MP
1041.32 near Curtiss (Parcel 1), and
between MP 1071.16 and MP 1084 at
Naco, Ariz. (Parcel 2), and to acquire all
of SPROC’s property rights, including
SPROC’s freight operating easement, in
a line segment between MP 1041.32 and
MP 1071.16 (Parcel 3),1 whose
underlying right-of-way UP currently
owns, and to operate over the same; and
(2) 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7) to acquire
overhead trackage rights over a line
between MP 1033.008 at Benson, Ariz.,
and MP 1040.15 at Curtiss (Leased
Line), that SPROC currently leases from
UP and operates.2
The earliest this transaction may be
consummated is September 22, 2012,
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2009 Dodge RAM
1500 Laramie Crew Cab Trucks
Manufactured for the Mexican Market.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified
Vehicles: 2009 Dodge RAM 1500 Laramie
Crew Cab Trucks.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 76 FR 49834 (August 11,
2011).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–535
(effective date September 21, 2011).
7. Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0031
Nonconforming Vehicles: Right-Hand Drive
2000–2003 Jeep Wrangler Multi-Purpose
Passenger Vehicles.
Because there are no substantially similar
U.S.-certified version Right-Hand Drive
2000–2003 Jeep Wrangler Multi-Purpose
Passenger Vehicles the petitioner sought
import eligibility under 49 U.S.C.
30141(a)(1)(B).
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 17567 (March 26,
2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VCP–50
(effective date July 27, 2012).
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8. Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0030
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2005 Ifor
Williams LM85G Trailers.
Because there are no substantially similar
U.S.-certified version 2005 Ifor Williams
LM85G Trailers the petitioner sought import
eligibility under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B).
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 17568 (March 26,
2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VCP–49
(effective date May 7, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:40 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
1 In San Pedro Railroad Operating Company,
LLC—Abandonment Exemption—In Cochise
County, Ariz., AB 1081X (STB served Feb. 3, 2006),
the Board granted SPROC an exemption to abandon
approximately 76.2 miles of railroad in Cochise
County, Ariz., including Parcels 1, 2, and 3 at issue
here. SPROC has sought, and received from the
Board, numerous extensions of the abandonment
authority consummation deadline for Parcels 1, 2,
and 3, the last of which set the consummation
deadline at September 24, 2012. San Pedro R.R.
Operating Co.—Aban. Exemption—In Cochise
Cnty., Ariz., AB 1081X (STB served July 5, 2012).
2 UP has included a copy of the proposed trackage
rights agreement between UP and SPROC and states
that a copy of the signed agreement will be filed
with the Board within 10 days of the filing of the
subject verified noticed of exemption.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the effective date of the exemption (30
days after the exemption was filed).
According to UP, the purpose of
assuming the rail operations over
Parcels 1, 2, and 3, and acquiring the
overhead trackage rights over the Leased
Line is to maintain continuity of
railroad service on the Curtiss Branch
Line and preserve the Curtiss Branch
Line for future and improved railroad
service. UP states that acquiring the
overhead trackage rights over the Leased
Line would also provide the connection
necessary for UP to serve and operate
the southern portion of the Curtiss
Branch Line.
In support of the exemption filed
under § 1180.2(d)(1), UP states the
Board previously granted SPROC the
authority to abandon Parcels 1, 2, and
3, and that UP’s acquisition of, and
authority to operate over, those portions
would not constitute a major market
extension for UP because: (1) The
Curtiss Branch Line does not extend to
the international border with Mexico;
(2) the Curtiss Branch Line is not in or
near any major commercial markets or
rail routes; (3) except for the Leased
Line, the entire Curtiss Branch Line was
approved for abandonment by the
Board; and (4) UP currently retains real
property ownership of the majority of
the right-of-way that makes up the
Curtiss Branch Line. In support of the
exemption filed under § 1180.2(d)(7),
the overhead trackage rights sought by
UP over the Leased Line are based on
a written agreement and such rights
were neither filed nor sought by UP in
a responsive application in a rail
consolidation proceeding.
The acquisition exemption is subject
to the conditions for the protection of
railroad employees in New York Dock
Railway—Control—Brooklyn Eastern
District Terminal, 360 I.C.C. 60 (1979),
aff’d sub nom. New York Dock Railway
v. United States, 609 F.2d 83 (2d Cir.
1979), as modified by Wilmington
Terminal Railroad—Purchase & Lease—
CSX Transportation, Inc., 6 I.C.C. 2d
799, 814–26 (1990), aff’d sub nom.
Railway Labor Executives’ Association
v. ICC, 930 F.2d 511 (6th Cir. 1991). As
a condition to the trackage rights
exemption, any employees affected by
the trackage rights will be protected by
the conditions imposed in Norfolk &
Western Railway—Trackage Rights—
Burlington Northern, Inc., 354 I.C.C. 605
(1978), as modified in Mendocino Coast
Railway—Lease & Operate—California
Western Railroad, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55267-55268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22034]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0105]
Decision That Certain Nonconforming Motor Vehicles Are Eligible
for Importation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Grant of Petitions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces decisions by NHTSA that certain motor
vehicles not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) are eligible for
importation into the United States because they are substantially
similar to vehicles originally manufactured for sale in the United
States and certified by their manufacturers as complying with the
safety standards, and they are capable of being readily altered to
conform to the standards or because they have safety features that
comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all
applicable FMVSS.
DATES: These decisions became effective on the dates specified in Annex
A.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Stevens, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and/or sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
Where there is no substantially similar U.S.-certified motor
vehicle, 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) permits a nonconforming motor vehicle
to be admitted into the United States if its safety features comply
with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all applicable
FMVSS based on destructive test data or such other evidence as NHTSA
decides to be adequate.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
NHTSA received petitions from registered importers to decide
whether the vehicles listed in Annex A to this notice are eligible for
importation into the United States. To afford an opportunity for public
comment, NHTSA published notice of these petitions as specified in
Annex A. The reader is referred to those notices for a thorough
description of the petitions.
Comments: No substantive comments were received in response to the
subject petitions.
NHTSA Decision: Accordingly, on the basis of the foregoing, NHTSA
hereby decides that each motor vehicle listed in Annex A to this
notice, which was not originally manufactured to comply with all
applicable FMVSS, is either substantially similar to a motor vehicle
manufactured for importation into and/or sale in the United States, and
certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, as specified in Annex A, and is
capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS or
has safety features that comply with, or is capable of being altered to
comply with, all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards.
Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject Vehicles: The importer of a
vehicle admissible under any final decision must indicate on the form
HS-7 accompanying entry the appropriate vehicle eligibility number
indicating that the vehicle is eligible for entry. Vehicle eligibility
numbers assigned to vehicles admissible under this decision are
specified in Annex A.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B) and (b)(1); 49
CFR 593.8; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: August 30, 2012.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
ANNEX A
Nonconforming Motor Vehicles Decided to be Eligible for Importation
1. Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0181
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1999 Volkswagen Bora Passenger Car.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles: 1999 Volkswagen
New Jetta Passenger Car.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 5303 (February 2, 2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP-540 (effective date August 8,
2012).
2. Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0035
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1999-2006 Toyota Land Cruiser IFS 100
Series Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles Manufactured prior to
September 1, 2006.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles: 1999-2006 Toyota
Land Cruiser IFS 100 Series Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles
Manufactured prior to September 1, 2006.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 20485 (April 4, 2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP-539 (effective date July 27,
2012).
3. Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0040
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2006 Left-Hand Drive Land Rover Range
Rover Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles Manufactured prior to
September 1, 2006.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles: 2006 Left-Hand
Drive Land Rover Range Rover Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles
Manufactured prior to September 1, 2006.
[[Page 55268]]
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 24264 (April 23, 2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP-538 (effective date August 8,
2012).
4. Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0182
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2000-2003 Kawasaki ZR750 Motorcycles.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles: 2000-2003
Kawasaki ZR750 Motorcycles.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 76 FR 82039 (December 29, 2011).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP-537 (effective date February 22,
2012).
5. Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0158
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2002 Jaguar XJ8 Passenger Cars
Manufactured for Sale in the Kuwaiti Market.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles: 2002 Jaguar XJ8
Passenger Cars.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 76 FR 69796 (November 9, 2011).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP-536 (effective date December 20,
2011).
6. Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0113
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2009 Dodge RAM 1500 Laramie Crew Cab
Trucks Manufactured for the Mexican Market.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles: 2009 Dodge RAM
1500 Laramie Crew Cab Trucks.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 76 FR 49834 (August 11, 2011).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP-535 (effective date September
21, 2011).
7. Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0031
Nonconforming Vehicles: Right-Hand Drive 2000-2003 Jeep Wrangler
Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles.
Because there are no substantially similar U.S.-certified
version Right-Hand Drive 2000-2003 Jeep Wrangler Multi-Purpose
Passenger Vehicles the petitioner sought import eligibility under 49
U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B).
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 17567 (March 26, 2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VCP-50 (effective date July 27,
2012).
8. Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0030
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2005 Ifor Williams LM85G Trailers.
Because there are no substantially similar U.S.-certified
version 2005 Ifor Williams LM85G Trailers the petitioner sought
import eligibility under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B).
Notice of Petition
Published at: 77 FR 17568 (March 26, 2012).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VCP-49 (effective date May 7, 2012).
9. Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0157
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1987-1994 ALPINA Burkard Bovensiepen
GmbH B11 Sedan Model Passenger Cars.
Because there are no substantially similar U.S.-certified
version 1987-1994 ALPINA Burkard Bovensiepen GmbH B11 Sedan Model
Passenger Cars the petitioner sought import eligibility under 49
U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B).
Notice of Petition
Published at: 76 FR 69323 (November 8, 2011).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VCP-48 (effective date December 19,
2011).
[FR Doc. 2012-22034 Filed 9-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P