Order Making Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Adjustments to Registration Fee Rates, 55240-55248 [2012-22022]

Download as PDF 55240 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices Portfolio is in the best interests of the Money Market Portfolio and its shareholders. The minutes of the meeting of the Board at which this approval was given must reflect in detail the reasons for the Board’s determination. The Board will review no less frequently than annually each Money Market Portfolio’s participation in transactions conducted pursuant to the exemption during the prior year and determine whether the Money Market Portfolio’s participation in such transactions continues to be in the best interests of the Money Market Portfolio and its shareholders. Such review will include (but not be limited to): (a) A comparison of the volume of transactions in each type of security conducted pursuant to the exemption to the market presence of DBSI in the market for that type of instrument, which market data may be based on good faith estimates to the extent that current formal data is not reasonably available, and (b) a determination that the Money Market Portfolios are maintaining appropriate trading relationships with other sources for each type of security to ensure that there are appropriate sources for the quotations required by condition 4. The minutes of the meeting of the Board at which such determinations are made will reflect in detail the reasons for the Board’s determinations. 12. Scope of Exemption—Applicants expressly acknowledge that any order issued on the application would grant relief from section 17(a) of the Act only, and would not grant relief from any other section of, or rule under, the Act including, without limitation, Rule 2a– 7. For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority. Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–22017 Filed 9–6–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION on the registration of securities.1 Section 13(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) requires the Commission to collect fees on specified repurchases of securities.2 Section 14(g) of the Exchange Act requires the Commission to collect fees on proxy solicitations and statements in corporate control transactions.3 The Investor and Capital Markets Fee Relief Act of 2002 (‘‘Fee Relief Act’’) 4 required the Commission to make annual adjustments to the fee rates applicable under these sections for each of the fiscal years 2003 through 2011 in an attempt to generate collections equal to yearly targets specified in the statute.5 Under the Fee Relief Act, each year’s fee rate was announced on the preceding April 30, and took effect five days after the date of enactment of the Commission’s regular appropriation. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (‘‘DoddFrank Act’’) 6 changed many of the provisions related to these fees. The Dodd-Frank Act created new annual collection targets for FY 2012 and thereafter. It also changed the date by which the Commission must announce a new fiscal year’s fee rate (August 31) and the date on which the new rate takes effect (October 1). II. Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Adjustment to the Fee Rate Section 6(b)(2) of the Securities Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, requires the Commission to make an annual adjustment to the fee rate applicable under Section 6(b).7 The annual adjustment to the fee rate under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act also sets the annual adjustment to the fee rates under Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act.8 Section 6(b)(2) sets forth the method for determining the annual adjustment to the fee rate under Section 6(b) for fiscal year 2013. Specifically, the Commission must adjust the fee rate under Section 6(b) to a ‘‘rate that, when applied to the baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering prices for 1 15 U.S.C. 77f(b). U.S.C. 78m(e). 3 15 U.S.C. 78n(g). 4 Public Law 107–123, 115 Stat. 2390 (2002). 5 See 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(5), 77f(b)(6), 78m(e)(5), 78m(e)(6), 78n(g)(5) and 78n(g)(6). 6 Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat.1376 (2010). 7 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(2). The annual adjustments are designed to adjust the fee rate in a given fiscal year so that, when applied to the aggregate maximum offering price at which securities are proposed to be offered for the fiscal year, it is reasonably likely to produce total fee collections under Section 6(b) equal to the ‘‘target fee collection amount’’ specified in Section 6(b)(6)(A) for that fiscal year. 8 15 U.S.C. 78m(e)(4) and 15 U.S.C. 78n(g)(4). 2 15 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [Release Nos. 33–9357; 34–67771/August 31, 2012] Order Making Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Adjustments to Registration Fee Rates I. Background The Commission collects fees under various provisions of the securities laws. Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (‘‘Securities Act’’) requires the Commission to collect fees from issuers VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Sep 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [fiscal year 2013], is reasonably likely to produce aggregate fee collections under [Section 6(b)] that are equal to the target fee collection amount for [fiscal year 2013].’’ That is, the adjusted rate is determined by dividing the ‘‘target fee collection amount’’ for fiscal year 2013 by the ‘‘baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering prices’’ for fiscal year 2013. Section 6(b)(6)(A) specifies that the ‘‘target fee collection amount’’ for fiscal year 2013 is $455,000,000. Section 6(b)(6)(B) defines the ‘‘baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price’’ for fiscal year 2013 as ‘‘the baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price at which securities are proposed to be offered pursuant to registration statements filed with the Commission during [fiscal year 2013] as determined by the Commission, after consultation with the Congressional Budget Office and the Office of Management and Budget * * * .’’ To make the baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price for fiscal year 2013, the Commission used a methodology similar to that developed in consultation with the Congressional Budget Office (‘‘CBO’’) and Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) to project the aggregate offering price for purposes of the fiscal year 2012 annual adjustment.9 Using this methodology, the Commission determines the ‘‘baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price’’ for fiscal year 2013 to be $3,336,846,226,098.10 Based on this estimate, the Commission calculates the fee rate for fiscal 2013 to be $136.40 per million. This adjusted fee rate applies to Section 6(b) of the Securities Act, as well as to Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act. III. Effective Dates of the Annual Adjustments The fiscal year 2013 annual adjustments to the fee rates applicable under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the 9 For the fiscal year 2011 estimate, the Commission used a ten-year series of monthly observations ending in March 2011. For fiscal year 2012, the Commission used a ten-year series ending in July 2011. For fiscal year 2013, the Commission used a ten-year series ending in July 2012. 10 Appendix A explains how we determined the ‘‘baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price’’ for fiscal year 2013 using our methodology, and then shows the purely arithmetical process of calculating the fiscal year 2013 annual adjustment based on that estimate. The appendix includes the data used by the Commission in making its ‘‘baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price’’ for fiscal year 2013. E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices Exchange Act will be effective on October 1, 2012.11 IV. Conclusion Accordingly, pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act,12 It is hereby ordered that the fee rates applicable under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act shall be $136.40 per million effective on October 1, 2012. By the Commission. Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary. Appendix A With the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Congress has, among other things, established a target amount of monies to be collected from fees charged to issuers based on the value of their registrations. This appendix provides the formula for determining such fees, which the Commission adjusts annually. Congress has mandated that the Commission determine these fees based on the ‘‘aggregate maximum offering prices,’’ which measures the aggregate dollar amount of securities registered with the Commission over the course of the year. In order to maximize the likelihood that the amount of monies targeted by Congress will be collected, the fee rate must be set to reflect projected aggregate maximum offering prices. As a percentage, the fee rate equals the ratio of the target amounts of monies to the projected aggregate maximum offering prices. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 11 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(4), 15 U.S.C. 78m(e)(6) and 15 U.S.C. 78n(g)(6). 12 15 U.S.C. 77f(b), 78m(e) and 78n(g). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Sep 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 For 2013, the Commission has estimated the aggregate maximum offering prices by projecting forward the trend established in the previous decade. More specifically, an ARIMA model was used to forecast the value of the aggregate maximum offering prices for months subsequent to July 2012, the last month for which the Commission has data on the aggregate maximum offering prices. The following sections describe this process in detail. A. Baseline Estimate of the Aggregate Maximum Offering Prices for Fiscal Year 2013 First, calculate the aggregate maximum offering prices (AMOP) for each month in the sample (July 2002–July 2012). Next, calculate the percentage change in the AMOP from month to month. Model the monthly percentage change in AMOP as a first order moving average process. The moving average approach allows one to model the effect that an exceptionally high (or low) observation of AMOP tends to be followed by a more ‘‘typical’’ value of AMOP. Use the estimated moving average model to forecast the monthly percent change in AMOP. These percent changes can then be applied to obtain forecasts of the total dollar value of registrations. The following is a more formal (mathematical) description of the procedure: 1. Begin with the monthly data for AMOP. The sample spans ten years, from July 2002 to July 2012. 2. Divide each month’s AMOP (column C) by the number of trading days in that month (column B) to obtain the average daily AMOP (AAMOP, column D). 3. For each month t, the natural logarithm of AAMOP is reported in column E. 4. Calculate the change in log(AAMOP) from the previous month as Dt = log (AAMOPt) ¥ log(AAMOPt ¥ 1). This approximates the percentage change. PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55241 5. Estimate the first order moving average model Dt = a + bet ¥ 1 + et, where et denotes the forecast error for month t. The forecast error is simply the difference between the one-month ahead forecast and the actual realization of Dt. The forecast error is expressed as et = Dt ¥ a ¥ bet ¥ 1. The model can be estimated using standard commercially available software. Using least squares, the estimated parameter values are a=0.0016886 and b=¥0.85600. 6. For the month of August 2012 forecast Dt = 8⁄12 = a + bet = 7⁄12. For all subsequent months, forecast Dt = a. 7. Calculate forecasts of log(AAMOP). For example, the forecast of log(AAMOP) for October 2012 is given by FLAAMOP t = 10⁄12 = log(AAMOP t = 7⁄12) + D t = 8⁄12 + Dt = 9⁄12 + Dt = 10⁄12. 8. Under the assumption that et is normally distributed, the n-step ahead forecast of AAMOP is given by exp(FLAAMOPt + sn2/2), where sn denotes the standard error of the nstep ahead forecast. 9. For October 2012, this gives a forecast AAMOP of $13.0 billion (Column I), and a forecast AMOP of $299.4 billion (Column J). 10. Iterate this process through September 2013 to obtain a baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering prices for fiscal year 2013 of $3,336,846,226,098. B. Using the Forecasts From A to Calculate the New Fee Rate 1. Using the data from Table A, estimate the aggregate maximum offering prices between 10/1/12 and 9/30/13 to be $3,336,846,226,098. 2. The rate necessary to collect the target $455,000,000 in fee revenues set by Congress is then calculated as: $455,000,000 ÷ $3,336,846,226,098= 0.000136356. 3. Round the result to the seventh decimal point, yielding a rate of 0.0001364 (or $136.40 per million). BILLING CODE 8011–01–P E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 VerDate Mar<15>2010 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices 17:04 Sep 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 EN07SE12.000</GPH> srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 55242 VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Sep 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 55243 EN07SE12.001</GPH> srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices VerDate Mar<15>2010 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices 17:04 Sep 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 EN07SE12.002</GPH> srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 55244 VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Sep 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 55245 EN07SE12.003</GPH> srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices VerDate Mar<15>2010 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices 17:04 Sep 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 EN07SE12.004</GPH> srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 55246 VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Sep 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 55247 EN07SE12.005</GPH> srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices 55248 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices 21, 2012, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. [FR Doc. 2012–22022 Filed 9–6–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–C SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [File No. 500–1] eHydrogen Solutions, Inc., and ChromoCure, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading September 5, 2012. It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of eHydrogen Solutions, Inc. (EHYD) because of questions concerning the adequacy of publicly available information about the company. It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of ChromoCure, Inc. (KKUR) because of questions concerning the adequacy of publicly available information about the company. The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. e.d.t., on September 5, 2012 through 11:59 p.m. e.d.t., on September 18, 2012. By the Commission. Jill M. Peterson, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–22168 Filed 9–5–12; 4:15 pm] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–67765; File No. SR–EDGA– 2012–38] srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Edge Routed Liquidity Report Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on August 1 15 2 17 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Sep 06, 2012 II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule Change BILLING CODE 8011–01–P August 31, 2012. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to offer a new Exchange market data product, Edge Routed Liquidity Report (‘‘Edge Routed Liquidity Report’’ or the ‘‘Service’’) to Members 3 and non-Members of the Exchange (collectively referred to as ‘‘Subscribers’’). The Exchange proposes to add a description of the Edge Routed Liquidity Report to new Rule 13.9. The text of the proposed rule change is attached as Exhibit 5 and is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s principal office, and at the Public Reference Room of the Commission. 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to begin offering Edge Routed Liquidity Report, a data feed that contains historical order information for orders routed to away destinations by the Exchange. Edge Routed Liquidity Report will be a data feed product that provides routed order information to Subscribers on the morning of the following trading day (T + 1), including: Limit price, routed quantity, symbol, side (bid/offer), time of routing, and the National Best Bid and Offer (NBBO) at the time of routing. 3 A Member is any registered broker or dealer that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange. Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Exchange will make Edge Routed Liquidity Report available to all Subscribers via subscription through secure Internet connections. Edge Routed Liquidity Report will be offered as either a standard report (the ‘‘Standard Report’’) or a premium report (the ‘‘Premium Report’’). Both the Standard Report and the Premium Report will provide Subscribers with a view of all marketable orders that are routed to away destinations by the Exchange. However, the Premium Report will also identify the routing destination as either directed to a destination that is not an exchange (‘‘Non-Exchange Destination’’) or directed to another exchange. For orders that are routed to a Non-Exchange Destination, the Premium Report will indicate the nature of any liquidity the originating routing strategy seeks. Purchasers of Edge Routed Liquidity Report will be able to elect to obtain data on a rolling thirty (30) day subscription or a calendar month request for as many months as desired. The Exchange is proposing to charge Subscribers a fee in the amount of $500.00/month for a rolling thirty (30) day Standard Report and $500.00/ month for a calendar month request. With respect to the Premium Report, the Exchange is proposing to charge Subscribers a fee in the amount of $1,500.00/month for a rolling thirty (30) day Premium Report and $1,500.00/ month for a calendar month request. Edge Routed Liquidity Report will be provided to Subscribers for internal use only, and thus, no redistribution will be permitted. Edge Routed Liquidity Report can be used by market participants to improve their trading and order routing strategies by being able to discern missed trading opportunities if a Member had been present on the EDGA book. Edge Routed Liquidity Report will provide an indication of the quantity/ quality of the order flow that Members of the Exchange could have interacted with if they had additional posted liquidity on the Exchange’s book. The purpose of Edge Routed Liquidity Report is to allow Subscribers to identify missed opportunities so that they can make the necessary trading system changes to better interact with missed liquidity. By making the Edge Routed Liquidity Report data available, the Exchange enhances market transparency and fosters competition among orders and markets. Historical data can be used for a variety of purposes, such as to support financial market research and analysis as well as back-testing of new trading strategies to gauge effectiveness. The E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55240-55248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22022]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release Nos. 33-9357; 34-67771/August 31, 2012]


Order Making Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Adjustments to Registration 
Fee Rates

I. Background

    The Commission collects fees under various provisions of the 
securities laws. Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 
(``Securities Act'') requires the Commission to collect fees from 
issuers on the registration of securities.\1\ Section 13(e) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') requires the 
Commission to collect fees on specified repurchases of securities.\2\ 
Section 14(g) of the Exchange Act requires the Commission to collect 
fees on proxy solicitations and statements in corporate control 
transactions.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78m(e).
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78n(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Investor and Capital Markets Fee Relief Act of 2002 (``Fee 
Relief Act'') \4\ required the Commission to make annual adjustments to 
the fee rates applicable under these sections for each of the fiscal 
years 2003 through 2011 in an attempt to generate collections equal to 
yearly targets specified in the statute.\5\ Under the Fee Relief Act, 
each year's fee rate was announced on the preceding April 30, and took 
effect five days after the date of enactment of the Commission's 
regular appropriation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Public Law 107-123, 115 Stat. 2390 (2002).
    \5\ See 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(5), 77f(b)(6), 78m(e)(5), 78m(e)(6), 
78n(g)(5) and 78n(g)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
(``Dodd-Frank Act'') \6\ changed many of the provisions related to 
these fees. The Dodd-Frank Act created new annual collection targets 
for FY 2012 and thereafter. It also changed the date by which the 
Commission must announce a new fiscal year's fee rate (August 31) and 
the date on which the new rate takes effect (October 1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat.1376 (2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Adjustment to the Fee Rate

    Section 6(b)(2) of the Securities Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank 
Act, requires the Commission to make an annual adjustment to the fee 
rate applicable under Section 6(b).\7\ The annual adjustment to the fee 
rate under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act also sets the annual 
adjustment to the fee rates under Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the 
Exchange Act.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(2). The annual adjustments are designed to 
adjust the fee rate in a given fiscal year so that, when applied to 
the aggregate maximum offering price at which securities are 
proposed to be offered for the fiscal year, it is reasonably likely 
to produce total fee collections under Section 6(b) equal to the 
``target fee collection amount'' specified in Section 6(b)(6)(A) for 
that fiscal year.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78m(e)(4) and 15 U.S.C. 78n(g)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 6(b)(2) sets forth the method for determining the annual 
adjustment to the fee rate under Section 6(b) for fiscal year 2013. 
Specifically, the Commission must adjust the fee rate under Section 
6(b) to a ``rate that, when applied to the baseline estimate of the 
aggregate maximum offering prices for [fiscal year 2013], is reasonably 
likely to produce aggregate fee collections under [Section 6(b)] that 
are equal to the target fee collection amount for [fiscal year 2013].'' 
That is, the adjusted rate is determined by dividing the ``target fee 
collection amount'' for fiscal year 2013 by the ``baseline estimate of 
the aggregate maximum offering prices'' for fiscal year 2013.
    Section 6(b)(6)(A) specifies that the ``target fee collection 
amount'' for fiscal year 2013 is $455,000,000. Section 6(b)(6)(B) 
defines the ``baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering 
price'' for fiscal year 2013 as ``the baseline estimate of the 
aggregate maximum offering price at which securities are proposed to be 
offered pursuant to registration statements filed with the Commission 
during [fiscal year 2013] as determined by the Commission, after 
consultation with the Congressional Budget Office and the Office of 
Management and Budget * * * .''
    To make the baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering 
price for fiscal year 2013, the Commission used a methodology similar 
to that developed in consultation with the Congressional Budget Office 
(``CBO'') and Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') to project the 
aggregate offering price for purposes of the fiscal year 2012 annual 
adjustment.\9\ Using this methodology, the Commission determines the 
``baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price'' for 
fiscal year 2013 to be $3,336,846,226,098.\10\ Based on this estimate, 
the Commission calculates the fee rate for fiscal 2013 to be $136.40 
per million. This adjusted fee rate applies to Section 6(b) of the 
Securities Act, as well as to Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange 
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ For the fiscal year 2011 estimate, the Commission used a 
ten-year series of monthly observations ending in March 2011. For 
fiscal year 2012, the Commission used a ten-year series ending in 
July 2011. For fiscal year 2013, the Commission used a ten-year 
series ending in July 2012.
    \10\ Appendix A explains how we determined the ``baseline 
estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price'' for fiscal year 
2013 using our methodology, and then shows the purely arithmetical 
process of calculating the fiscal year 2013 annual adjustment based 
on that estimate. The appendix includes the data used by the 
Commission in making its ``baseline estimate of the aggregate 
maximum offering price'' for fiscal year 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Effective Dates of the Annual Adjustments

    The fiscal year 2013 annual adjustments to the fee rates applicable 
under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) 
of the

[[Page 55241]]

Exchange Act will be effective on October 1, 2012.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(4), 15 U.S.C. 78m(e)(6) and 15 U.S.C. 
78n(g)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    Accordingly, pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and 
Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act,\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b), 78m(e) and 78n(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is hereby ordered that the fee rates applicable under Section 
6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange 
Act shall be $136.40 per million effective on October 1, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.

Appendix A

    With the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act, Congress has, among other things, 
established a target amount of monies to be collected from fees 
charged to issuers based on the value of their registrations. This 
appendix provides the formula for determining such fees, which the 
Commission adjusts annually. Congress has mandated that the 
Commission determine these fees based on the ``aggregate maximum 
offering prices,'' which measures the aggregate dollar amount of 
securities registered with the Commission over the course of the 
year. In order to maximize the likelihood that the amount of monies 
targeted by Congress will be collected, the fee rate must be set to 
reflect projected aggregate maximum offering prices. As a 
percentage, the fee rate equals the ratio of the target amounts of 
monies to the projected aggregate maximum offering prices.
    For 2013, the Commission has estimated the aggregate maximum 
offering prices by projecting forward the trend established in the 
previous decade. More specifically, an ARIMA model was used to 
forecast the value of the aggregate maximum offering prices for 
months subsequent to July 2012, the last month for which the 
Commission has data on the aggregate maximum offering prices.
    The following sections describe this process in detail.

A. Baseline Estimate of the Aggregate Maximum Offering Prices for 
Fiscal Year 2013

    First, calculate the aggregate maximum offering prices (AMOP) 
for each month in the sample (July 2002-July 2012). Next, calculate 
the percentage change in the AMOP from month to month.
    Model the monthly percentage change in AMOP as a first order 
moving average process. The moving average approach allows one to 
model the effect that an exceptionally high (or low) observation of 
AMOP tends to be followed by a more ``typical'' value of AMOP.
    Use the estimated moving average model to forecast the monthly 
percent change in AMOP. These percent changes can then be applied to 
obtain forecasts of the total dollar value of registrations. The 
following is a more formal (mathematical) description of the 
procedure:
    1. Begin with the monthly data for AMOP. The sample spans ten 
years, from July 2002 to July 2012.
    2. Divide each month's AMOP (column C) by the number of trading 
days in that month (column B) to obtain the average daily AMOP 
(AAMOP, column D).
    3. For each month t, the natural logarithm of AAMOP is reported 
in column E.
    4. Calculate the change in log(AAMOP) from the previous month as 
[Delta]t = log (AAMOPt) - 
log(AAMOPt - 1). This approximates the percentage change.
    5. Estimate the first order moving average model 
[Delta]t = [alpha] + [beta]et - 1 + 
et, where et denotes the forecast error for 
month t. The forecast error is simply the difference between the 
one-month ahead forecast and the actual realization of 
[Delta]t. The forecast error is expressed as 
et = [Delta]t - [alpha] - 
[beta]et - 1. The model can be estimated using standard 
commercially available software. Using least squares, the estimated 
parameter values are [alpha]=0.0016886 and [beta]=-0.85600.
    6. For the month of August 2012 forecast 
[Delta]t = \8/12\ = [alpha] + 
[beta]et = \7/12\. For all subsequent months, forecast 
[Delta]t = [alpha].
    7. Calculate forecasts of log(AAMOP). For example, the forecast 
of log(AAMOP) for October 2012 is given by FLAAMOP 
t = \10/12\ = log(AAMOP t = \7/12\) + [Delta] 
t = \8/12\ + [Delta]t = \9/12\ + 
[Delta]t = \10/12\.
    8. Under the assumption that et is normally 
distributed, the n-step ahead forecast of AAMOP is given by 
exp(FLAAMOPt + [sigma]n\2\/2), where 
[sigma]n denotes the standard error of the n-step ahead 
forecast.
    9. For October 2012, this gives a forecast AAMOP of $13.0 
billion (Column I), and a forecast AMOP of $299.4 billion (Column 
J).
    10. Iterate this process through September 2013 to obtain a 
baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering prices for 
fiscal year 2013 of $3,336,846,226,098.

B. Using the Forecasts From A to Calculate the New Fee Rate

    1. Using the data from Table A, estimate the aggregate maximum 
offering prices between 10/1/12 and 9/30/13 to be 
$3,336,846,226,098.
    2. The rate necessary to collect the target $455,000,000 in fee 
revenues set by Congress is then calculated as: $455,000,000 / 
$3,336,846,226,098= 0.000136356.
    3. Round the result to the seventh decimal point, yielding a 
rate of 0.0001364 (or $136.40 per million).
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

[[Page 55242]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.000


[[Page 55243]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.001


[[Page 55244]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.002


[[Page 55245]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.003


[[Page 55246]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.004


[[Page 55247]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.005


[[Page 55248]]


[FR Doc. 2012-22022 Filed 9-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-C
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.