Order Making Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Adjustments to Registration Fee Rates, 55240-55248 [2012-22022]
Download as PDF
55240
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
Portfolio is in the best interests of the
Money Market Portfolio and its
shareholders. The minutes of the
meeting of the Board at which this
approval was given must reflect in
detail the reasons for the Board’s
determination. The Board will review
no less frequently than annually each
Money Market Portfolio’s participation
in transactions conducted pursuant to
the exemption during the prior year and
determine whether the Money Market
Portfolio’s participation in such
transactions continues to be in the best
interests of the Money Market Portfolio
and its shareholders. Such review will
include (but not be limited to): (a) A
comparison of the volume of
transactions in each type of security
conducted pursuant to the exemption to
the market presence of DBSI in the
market for that type of instrument,
which market data may be based on
good faith estimates to the extent that
current formal data is not reasonably
available, and (b) a determination that
the Money Market Portfolios are
maintaining appropriate trading
relationships with other sources for
each type of security to ensure that there
are appropriate sources for the
quotations required by condition 4. The
minutes of the meeting of the Board at
which such determinations are made
will reflect in detail the reasons for the
Board’s determinations.
12. Scope of Exemption—Applicants
expressly acknowledge that any order
issued on the application would grant
relief from section 17(a) of the Act only,
and would not grant relief from any
other section of, or rule under, the Act
including, without limitation, Rule 2a–
7.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–22017 Filed 9–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
on the registration of securities.1 Section
13(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) requires the
Commission to collect fees on specified
repurchases of securities.2 Section 14(g)
of the Exchange Act requires the
Commission to collect fees on proxy
solicitations and statements in corporate
control transactions.3
The Investor and Capital Markets Fee
Relief Act of 2002 (‘‘Fee Relief Act’’) 4
required the Commission to make
annual adjustments to the fee rates
applicable under these sections for each
of the fiscal years 2003 through 2011 in
an attempt to generate collections equal
to yearly targets specified in the
statute.5 Under the Fee Relief Act, each
year’s fee rate was announced on the
preceding April 30, and took effect five
days after the date of enactment of the
Commission’s regular appropriation.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act (‘‘DoddFrank Act’’) 6 changed many of the
provisions related to these fees. The
Dodd-Frank Act created new annual
collection targets for FY 2012 and
thereafter. It also changed the date by
which the Commission must announce
a new fiscal year’s fee rate (August 31)
and the date on which the new rate
takes effect (October 1).
II. Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Adjustment
to the Fee Rate
Section 6(b)(2) of the Securities Act,
as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act,
requires the Commission to make an
annual adjustment to the fee rate
applicable under Section 6(b).7 The
annual adjustment to the fee rate under
Section 6(b) of the Securities Act also
sets the annual adjustment to the fee
rates under Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of
the Exchange Act.8
Section 6(b)(2) sets forth the method
for determining the annual adjustment
to the fee rate under Section 6(b) for
fiscal year 2013. Specifically, the
Commission must adjust the fee rate
under Section 6(b) to a ‘‘rate that, when
applied to the baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering prices for
1 15
U.S.C. 77f(b).
U.S.C. 78m(e).
3 15 U.S.C. 78n(g).
4 Public Law 107–123, 115 Stat. 2390 (2002).
5 See 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(5), 77f(b)(6), 78m(e)(5),
78m(e)(6), 78n(g)(5) and 78n(g)(6).
6 Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat.1376 (2010).
7 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(2). The annual adjustments are
designed to adjust the fee rate in a given fiscal year
so that, when applied to the aggregate maximum
offering price at which securities are proposed to
be offered for the fiscal year, it is reasonably likely
to produce total fee collections under Section 6(b)
equal to the ‘‘target fee collection amount’’ specified
in Section 6(b)(6)(A) for that fiscal year.
8 15 U.S.C. 78m(e)(4) and 15 U.S.C. 78n(g)(4).
2 15
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Release Nos. 33–9357; 34–67771/August
31, 2012]
Order Making Fiscal Year 2013 Annual
Adjustments to Registration Fee Rates
I. Background
The Commission collects fees under
various provisions of the securities
laws. Section 6(b) of the Securities Act
of 1933 (‘‘Securities Act’’) requires the
Commission to collect fees from issuers
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[fiscal year 2013], is reasonably likely to
produce aggregate fee collections under
[Section 6(b)] that are equal to the target
fee collection amount for [fiscal year
2013].’’ That is, the adjusted rate is
determined by dividing the ‘‘target fee
collection amount’’ for fiscal year 2013
by the ‘‘baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering prices’’ for
fiscal year 2013.
Section 6(b)(6)(A) specifies that the
‘‘target fee collection amount’’ for fiscal
year 2013 is $455,000,000. Section
6(b)(6)(B) defines the ‘‘baseline estimate
of the aggregate maximum offering
price’’ for fiscal year 2013 as ‘‘the
baseline estimate of the aggregate
maximum offering price at which
securities are proposed to be offered
pursuant to registration statements filed
with the Commission during [fiscal year
2013] as determined by the
Commission, after consultation with the
Congressional Budget Office and the
Office of Management and
Budget * * * .’’
To make the baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering price for
fiscal year 2013, the Commission used
a methodology similar to that developed
in consultation with the Congressional
Budget Office (‘‘CBO’’) and Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) to
project the aggregate offering price for
purposes of the fiscal year 2012 annual
adjustment.9 Using this methodology,
the Commission determines the
‘‘baseline estimate of the aggregate
maximum offering price’’ for fiscal year
2013 to be $3,336,846,226,098.10 Based
on this estimate, the Commission
calculates the fee rate for fiscal 2013 to
be $136.40 per million. This adjusted
fee rate applies to Section 6(b) of the
Securities Act, as well as to Sections
13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act.
III. Effective Dates of the Annual
Adjustments
The fiscal year 2013 annual
adjustments to the fee rates applicable
under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act
and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the
9 For the fiscal year 2011 estimate, the
Commission used a ten-year series of monthly
observations ending in March 2011. For fiscal year
2012, the Commission used a ten-year series ending
in July 2011. For fiscal year 2013, the Commission
used a ten-year series ending in July 2012.
10 Appendix A explains how we determined the
‘‘baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum
offering price’’ for fiscal year 2013 using our
methodology, and then shows the purely
arithmetical process of calculating the fiscal year
2013 annual adjustment based on that estimate. The
appendix includes the data used by the
Commission in making its ‘‘baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering price’’ for fiscal year
2013.
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
Exchange Act will be effective on
October 1, 2012.11
IV. Conclusion
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 6(b)
of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e)
and 14(g) of the Exchange Act,12
It is hereby ordered that the fee rates
applicable under Section 6(b) of the
Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and
14(g) of the Exchange Act shall be
$136.40 per million effective on October
1, 2012.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
Appendix A
With the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,
Congress has, among other things,
established a target amount of monies to be
collected from fees charged to issuers based
on the value of their registrations. This
appendix provides the formula for
determining such fees, which the
Commission adjusts annually. Congress has
mandated that the Commission determine
these fees based on the ‘‘aggregate maximum
offering prices,’’ which measures the
aggregate dollar amount of securities
registered with the Commission over the
course of the year. In order to maximize the
likelihood that the amount of monies targeted
by Congress will be collected, the fee rate
must be set to reflect projected aggregate
maximum offering prices. As a percentage,
the fee rate equals the ratio of the target
amounts of monies to the projected aggregate
maximum offering prices.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(4), 15 U.S.C. 78m(e)(6) and 15
U.S.C. 78n(g)(6).
12 15 U.S.C. 77f(b), 78m(e) and 78n(g).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
For 2013, the Commission has estimated
the aggregate maximum offering prices by
projecting forward the trend established in
the previous decade. More specifically, an
ARIMA model was used to forecast the value
of the aggregate maximum offering prices for
months subsequent to July 2012, the last
month for which the Commission has data on
the aggregate maximum offering prices.
The following sections describe this
process in detail.
A. Baseline Estimate of the Aggregate
Maximum Offering Prices for Fiscal Year
2013
First, calculate the aggregate maximum
offering prices (AMOP) for each month in the
sample (July 2002–July 2012). Next, calculate
the percentage change in the AMOP from
month to month.
Model the monthly percentage change in
AMOP as a first order moving average
process. The moving average approach
allows one to model the effect that an
exceptionally high (or low) observation of
AMOP tends to be followed by a more
‘‘typical’’ value of AMOP.
Use the estimated moving average model to
forecast the monthly percent change in
AMOP. These percent changes can then be
applied to obtain forecasts of the total dollar
value of registrations. The following is a
more formal (mathematical) description of
the procedure:
1. Begin with the monthly data for AMOP.
The sample spans ten years, from July 2002
to July 2012.
2. Divide each month’s AMOP (column C)
by the number of trading days in that month
(column B) to obtain the average daily AMOP
(AAMOP, column D).
3. For each month t, the natural logarithm
of AAMOP is reported in column E.
4. Calculate the change in log(AAMOP)
from the previous month as Dt = log
(AAMOPt) ¥ log(AAMOPt ¥ 1). This
approximates the percentage change.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55241
5. Estimate the first order moving average
model Dt = a + bet ¥ 1 + et, where et denotes
the forecast error for month t. The forecast
error is simply the difference between the
one-month ahead forecast and the actual
realization of Dt. The forecast error is
expressed as et = Dt ¥ a ¥ bet ¥ 1. The model
can be estimated using standard
commercially available software. Using least
squares, the estimated parameter values are
a=0.0016886 and b=¥0.85600.
6. For the month of August 2012 forecast
Dt = 8⁄12 = a + bet = 7⁄12. For all subsequent
months, forecast Dt = a.
7. Calculate forecasts of log(AAMOP). For
example, the forecast of log(AAMOP) for
October 2012 is given by FLAAMOP t = 10⁄12
= log(AAMOP t = 7⁄12) + D t = 8⁄12 + Dt = 9⁄12 +
Dt = 10⁄12.
8. Under the assumption that et is normally
distributed, the n-step ahead forecast of
AAMOP is given by exp(FLAAMOPt + sn2/2),
where sn denotes the standard error of the nstep ahead forecast.
9. For October 2012, this gives a forecast
AAMOP of $13.0 billion (Column I), and a
forecast AMOP of $299.4 billion (Column J).
10. Iterate this process through September
2013 to obtain a baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering prices for fiscal
year 2013 of $3,336,846,226,098.
B. Using the Forecasts From A to Calculate
the New Fee Rate
1. Using the data from Table A, estimate
the aggregate maximum offering prices
between 10/1/12 and 9/30/13 to be
$3,336,846,226,098.
2. The rate necessary to collect the target
$455,000,000 in fee revenues set by Congress
is then calculated as: $455,000,000 ÷
$3,336,846,226,098= 0.000136356.
3. Round the result to the seventh decimal
point, yielding a rate of 0.0001364 (or
$136.40 per million).
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
EN07SE12.000
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
55242
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
55243
EN07SE12.001
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
EN07SE12.002
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
55244
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
55245
EN07SE12.003
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
EN07SE12.004
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
55246
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
55247
EN07SE12.005
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
55248
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2012 / Notices
21, 2012, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
[FR Doc. 2012–22022 Filed 9–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–C
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 500–1]
eHydrogen Solutions, Inc., and
ChromoCure, Inc.; Order of
Suspension of Trading
September 5, 2012.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of eHydrogen
Solutions, Inc. (EHYD) because of
questions concerning the adequacy of
publicly available information about the
company.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of
ChromoCure, Inc. (KKUR) because of
questions concerning the adequacy of
publicly available information about the
company.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of the above-listed
companies.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, that trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies
is suspended for the period from 9:30
a.m. e.d.t., on September 5, 2012
through 11:59 p.m. e.d.t., on September
18, 2012.
By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–22168 Filed 9–5–12; 4:15 pm]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67765; File No. SR–EDGA–
2012–38]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Edge Routed
Liquidity Report
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Sep 06, 2012
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
August 31, 2012.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to offer a new
Exchange market data product, Edge
Routed Liquidity Report (‘‘Edge Routed
Liquidity Report’’ or the ‘‘Service’’) to
Members 3 and non-Members of the
Exchange (collectively referred to as
‘‘Subscribers’’). The Exchange proposes
to add a description of the Edge Routed
Liquidity Report to new Rule 13.9. The
text of the proposed rule change is
attached as Exhibit 5 and is available on
the Exchange’s Web site at
www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s
principal office, and at the Public
Reference Room of the Commission.
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to begin offering Edge Routed
Liquidity Report, a data feed that
contains historical order information for
orders routed to away destinations by
the Exchange. Edge Routed Liquidity
Report will be a data feed product that
provides routed order information to
Subscribers on the morning of the
following trading day (T + 1), including:
Limit price, routed quantity, symbol,
side (bid/offer), time of routing, and the
National Best Bid and Offer (NBBO) at
the time of routing.
3 A Member is any registered broker or dealer that
has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange will make Edge Routed
Liquidity Report available to all
Subscribers via subscription through
secure Internet connections. Edge
Routed Liquidity Report will be offered
as either a standard report (the
‘‘Standard Report’’) or a premium report
(the ‘‘Premium Report’’). Both the
Standard Report and the Premium
Report will provide Subscribers with a
view of all marketable orders that are
routed to away destinations by the
Exchange. However, the Premium
Report will also identify the routing
destination as either directed to a
destination that is not an exchange
(‘‘Non-Exchange Destination’’) or
directed to another exchange. For orders
that are routed to a Non-Exchange
Destination, the Premium Report will
indicate the nature of any liquidity the
originating routing strategy seeks.
Purchasers of Edge Routed Liquidity
Report will be able to elect to obtain
data on a rolling thirty (30) day
subscription or a calendar month
request for as many months as desired.
The Exchange is proposing to charge
Subscribers a fee in the amount of
$500.00/month for a rolling thirty (30)
day Standard Report and $500.00/
month for a calendar month request.
With respect to the Premium Report, the
Exchange is proposing to charge
Subscribers a fee in the amount of
$1,500.00/month for a rolling thirty (30)
day Premium Report and $1,500.00/
month for a calendar month request.
Edge Routed Liquidity Report will be
provided to Subscribers for internal use
only, and thus, no redistribution will be
permitted. Edge Routed Liquidity
Report can be used by market
participants to improve their trading
and order routing strategies by being
able to discern missed trading
opportunities if a Member had been
present on the EDGA book.
Edge Routed Liquidity Report will
provide an indication of the quantity/
quality of the order flow that Members
of the Exchange could have interacted
with if they had additional posted
liquidity on the Exchange’s book. The
purpose of Edge Routed Liquidity
Report is to allow Subscribers to
identify missed opportunities so that
they can make the necessary trading
system changes to better interact with
missed liquidity. By making the Edge
Routed Liquidity Report data available,
the Exchange enhances market
transparency and fosters competition
among orders and markets.
Historical data can be used for a
variety of purposes, such as to support
financial market research and analysis
as well as back-testing of new trading
strategies to gauge effectiveness. The
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55240-55248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22022]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release Nos. 33-9357; 34-67771/August 31, 2012]
Order Making Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Adjustments to Registration
Fee Rates
I. Background
The Commission collects fees under various provisions of the
securities laws. Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933
(``Securities Act'') requires the Commission to collect fees from
issuers on the registration of securities.\1\ Section 13(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') requires the
Commission to collect fees on specified repurchases of securities.\2\
Section 14(g) of the Exchange Act requires the Commission to collect
fees on proxy solicitations and statements in corporate control
transactions.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78m(e).
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78n(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Investor and Capital Markets Fee Relief Act of 2002 (``Fee
Relief Act'') \4\ required the Commission to make annual adjustments to
the fee rates applicable under these sections for each of the fiscal
years 2003 through 2011 in an attempt to generate collections equal to
yearly targets specified in the statute.\5\ Under the Fee Relief Act,
each year's fee rate was announced on the preceding April 30, and took
effect five days after the date of enactment of the Commission's
regular appropriation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Public Law 107-123, 115 Stat. 2390 (2002).
\5\ See 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(5), 77f(b)(6), 78m(e)(5), 78m(e)(6),
78n(g)(5) and 78n(g)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(``Dodd-Frank Act'') \6\ changed many of the provisions related to
these fees. The Dodd-Frank Act created new annual collection targets
for FY 2012 and thereafter. It also changed the date by which the
Commission must announce a new fiscal year's fee rate (August 31) and
the date on which the new rate takes effect (October 1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat.1376 (2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Adjustment to the Fee Rate
Section 6(b)(2) of the Securities Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank
Act, requires the Commission to make an annual adjustment to the fee
rate applicable under Section 6(b).\7\ The annual adjustment to the fee
rate under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act also sets the annual
adjustment to the fee rates under Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the
Exchange Act.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(2). The annual adjustments are designed to
adjust the fee rate in a given fiscal year so that, when applied to
the aggregate maximum offering price at which securities are
proposed to be offered for the fiscal year, it is reasonably likely
to produce total fee collections under Section 6(b) equal to the
``target fee collection amount'' specified in Section 6(b)(6)(A) for
that fiscal year.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78m(e)(4) and 15 U.S.C. 78n(g)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 6(b)(2) sets forth the method for determining the annual
adjustment to the fee rate under Section 6(b) for fiscal year 2013.
Specifically, the Commission must adjust the fee rate under Section
6(b) to a ``rate that, when applied to the baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering prices for [fiscal year 2013], is reasonably
likely to produce aggregate fee collections under [Section 6(b)] that
are equal to the target fee collection amount for [fiscal year 2013].''
That is, the adjusted rate is determined by dividing the ``target fee
collection amount'' for fiscal year 2013 by the ``baseline estimate of
the aggregate maximum offering prices'' for fiscal year 2013.
Section 6(b)(6)(A) specifies that the ``target fee collection
amount'' for fiscal year 2013 is $455,000,000. Section 6(b)(6)(B)
defines the ``baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering
price'' for fiscal year 2013 as ``the baseline estimate of the
aggregate maximum offering price at which securities are proposed to be
offered pursuant to registration statements filed with the Commission
during [fiscal year 2013] as determined by the Commission, after
consultation with the Congressional Budget Office and the Office of
Management and Budget * * * .''
To make the baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering
price for fiscal year 2013, the Commission used a methodology similar
to that developed in consultation with the Congressional Budget Office
(``CBO'') and Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') to project the
aggregate offering price for purposes of the fiscal year 2012 annual
adjustment.\9\ Using this methodology, the Commission determines the
``baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price'' for
fiscal year 2013 to be $3,336,846,226,098.\10\ Based on this estimate,
the Commission calculates the fee rate for fiscal 2013 to be $136.40
per million. This adjusted fee rate applies to Section 6(b) of the
Securities Act, as well as to Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ For the fiscal year 2011 estimate, the Commission used a
ten-year series of monthly observations ending in March 2011. For
fiscal year 2012, the Commission used a ten-year series ending in
July 2011. For fiscal year 2013, the Commission used a ten-year
series ending in July 2012.
\10\ Appendix A explains how we determined the ``baseline
estimate of the aggregate maximum offering price'' for fiscal year
2013 using our methodology, and then shows the purely arithmetical
process of calculating the fiscal year 2013 annual adjustment based
on that estimate. The appendix includes the data used by the
Commission in making its ``baseline estimate of the aggregate
maximum offering price'' for fiscal year 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Effective Dates of the Annual Adjustments
The fiscal year 2013 annual adjustments to the fee rates applicable
under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g)
of the
[[Page 55241]]
Exchange Act will be effective on October 1, 2012.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b)(4), 15 U.S.C. 78m(e)(6) and 15 U.S.C.
78n(g)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and
Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange Act,\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 77f(b), 78m(e) and 78n(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is hereby ordered that the fee rates applicable under Section
6(b) of the Securities Act and Sections 13(e) and 14(g) of the Exchange
Act shall be $136.40 per million effective on October 1, 2012.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
Appendix A
With the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act, Congress has, among other things,
established a target amount of monies to be collected from fees
charged to issuers based on the value of their registrations. This
appendix provides the formula for determining such fees, which the
Commission adjusts annually. Congress has mandated that the
Commission determine these fees based on the ``aggregate maximum
offering prices,'' which measures the aggregate dollar amount of
securities registered with the Commission over the course of the
year. In order to maximize the likelihood that the amount of monies
targeted by Congress will be collected, the fee rate must be set to
reflect projected aggregate maximum offering prices. As a
percentage, the fee rate equals the ratio of the target amounts of
monies to the projected aggregate maximum offering prices.
For 2013, the Commission has estimated the aggregate maximum
offering prices by projecting forward the trend established in the
previous decade. More specifically, an ARIMA model was used to
forecast the value of the aggregate maximum offering prices for
months subsequent to July 2012, the last month for which the
Commission has data on the aggregate maximum offering prices.
The following sections describe this process in detail.
A. Baseline Estimate of the Aggregate Maximum Offering Prices for
Fiscal Year 2013
First, calculate the aggregate maximum offering prices (AMOP)
for each month in the sample (July 2002-July 2012). Next, calculate
the percentage change in the AMOP from month to month.
Model the monthly percentage change in AMOP as a first order
moving average process. The moving average approach allows one to
model the effect that an exceptionally high (or low) observation of
AMOP tends to be followed by a more ``typical'' value of AMOP.
Use the estimated moving average model to forecast the monthly
percent change in AMOP. These percent changes can then be applied to
obtain forecasts of the total dollar value of registrations. The
following is a more formal (mathematical) description of the
procedure:
1. Begin with the monthly data for AMOP. The sample spans ten
years, from July 2002 to July 2012.
2. Divide each month's AMOP (column C) by the number of trading
days in that month (column B) to obtain the average daily AMOP
(AAMOP, column D).
3. For each month t, the natural logarithm of AAMOP is reported
in column E.
4. Calculate the change in log(AAMOP) from the previous month as
[Delta]t = log (AAMOPt) -
log(AAMOPt - 1). This approximates the percentage change.
5. Estimate the first order moving average model
[Delta]t = [alpha] + [beta]et - 1 +
et, where et denotes the forecast error for
month t. The forecast error is simply the difference between the
one-month ahead forecast and the actual realization of
[Delta]t. The forecast error is expressed as
et = [Delta]t - [alpha] -
[beta]et - 1. The model can be estimated using standard
commercially available software. Using least squares, the estimated
parameter values are [alpha]=0.0016886 and [beta]=-0.85600.
6. For the month of August 2012 forecast
[Delta]t = \8/12\ = [alpha] +
[beta]et = \7/12\. For all subsequent months, forecast
[Delta]t = [alpha].
7. Calculate forecasts of log(AAMOP). For example, the forecast
of log(AAMOP) for October 2012 is given by FLAAMOP
t = \10/12\ = log(AAMOP t = \7/12\) + [Delta]
t = \8/12\ + [Delta]t = \9/12\ +
[Delta]t = \10/12\.
8. Under the assumption that et is normally
distributed, the n-step ahead forecast of AAMOP is given by
exp(FLAAMOPt + [sigma]n\2\/2), where
[sigma]n denotes the standard error of the n-step ahead
forecast.
9. For October 2012, this gives a forecast AAMOP of $13.0
billion (Column I), and a forecast AMOP of $299.4 billion (Column
J).
10. Iterate this process through September 2013 to obtain a
baseline estimate of the aggregate maximum offering prices for
fiscal year 2013 of $3,336,846,226,098.
B. Using the Forecasts From A to Calculate the New Fee Rate
1. Using the data from Table A, estimate the aggregate maximum
offering prices between 10/1/12 and 9/30/13 to be
$3,336,846,226,098.
2. The rate necessary to collect the target $455,000,000 in fee
revenues set by Congress is then calculated as: $455,000,000 /
$3,336,846,226,098= 0.000136356.
3. Round the result to the seventh decimal point, yielding a
rate of 0.0001364 (or $136.40 per million).
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[[Page 55242]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.000
[[Page 55243]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.001
[[Page 55244]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.002
[[Page 55245]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.003
[[Page 55246]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.004
[[Page 55247]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07SE12.005
[[Page 55248]]
[FR Doc. 2012-22022 Filed 9-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-C