Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 54898-54899 [2012-22002]
Download as PDF
54898
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2012 / Notices
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time,1 the Department of Commerce (the
Department) is publishing this notice of
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on ferrovanadium and nitrided
vanadium from Russia.
DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Goldberger or Rebecca Trainor,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4136 and (202)
482–4007, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 10, 1995, the Department
published the antidumping duty order
on ferrovanadium and nitrided
vanadium from Russia.2 On September
1, 2011, the Department initiated and
the ITC instituted the third sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on ferrovanadium and nitrided
vanadium from Russia, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act).3
The Department expedited the third
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on nitrided vanadium from
Russia. As a result of its review, the
Department found that revocation of the
antidumping duty order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping and notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail were the order to be revoked.4
On August 22, 2012, the ITC notified
the Department that, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act, revocation of this
order would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.5
Scope of the Order
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The products covered by the order are
ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium,
1 See Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium
From Russia, 77 FR 51825 (August 27, 2012) (ITC
Final).
2 See Notice of Antidumping Order:
Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium from the
Russian Federation, 60 FR 35550 (July 10, 1995).
3 See Initiation, and Ferrovanadium and Nitrided
Vanadium From Russia; Institution of a Five-Year
Review Concerning the Antidumping Duty Order on
Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium From
Russia, 76 FR 54490 (September 1, 2011).
4 See Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review:
Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium From
Russia, 76 FR 78888 (December 20, 2011).
5 See ITC Final and Ferrovanadium and Nitrided
Vanadium From Russia: Investigation No. 731–TA–
702 (Third Review), USITC Publication 4345
(August 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:45 Sep 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
regardless of grade, chemistry, form or
size, unless expressly excluded from the
scope of the order. Ferrovanadium
includes alloys containing
ferrovanadium as the predominant
element by weight (i.e., more weight
than any other element, except iron in
some instances) and at least 4 percent
by weight of iron. Nitrided vanadium
includes compounds containing
vanadium as the predominant element,
by weight, and at least 5 percent, by
weight, of nitrogen.
Excluded from the scope of the order
are vanadium additives other than
ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium,
such as vanadium-aluminum master
alloys, vanadium chemicals, vanadium
waste and scrap, vanadium-bearing raw
materials, such as slag, boiler residues,
fly ash, and vanadium oxides.
The products subject to the order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
2850.00.20, 7202.92.00, 7202.99.5040,
8112.40.3000, and 8112.40.6000 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope is
dispositive.
Revocation
6 See Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium
From Russia: Notice of Continuation of
Antidumping Duty Order, 71 FR 60475 (October 13,
2006).
Frm 00025
Dated: August 30, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–22019 Filed 9–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–905]
As a result of the determination by the
ITC that revocation of the order is not
likely to lead to the continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
Department, pursuant to section 751(d)
of the Act, is revoking the antidumping
duty order on ferrovanadium and
nitrided vanadium from Russia.
Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective
date of revocation is October 13, 2011
(i.e., the fifth anniversary of the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the most recent notice of continuation of
the antidumping duty order).6 The
Department intends to notify U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP),
15 days after publication of this notice,
to discontinue suspension of liquidation
and collection of cash deposits on
entries of ferrovanadium and nitrided
vanadium from Russia entered or
withdrawn from warehouse on or after
October 13, 2011, the effective date of
revocation of the antidumping duty
order. The Department will further
instruct CBP to refund with interest any
cash deposits on entries made on or
after October 13, 2011. Entries of subject
merchandise prior to the effective date
PO 00000
of revocation will continue to be subject
to suspension of liquidation and
antidumping deposit requirements. The
Department will complete any pending
administrative reviews of this order.
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return/destruction or conversion to
judicial protective order of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Failure to comply is a violation of the
APO which may be subject to sanctions.
This revocation and notice are issued
in accordance with section 751(d)(2) of
the Act and published pursuant to
section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.222(i)(2).
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Expedited Sunset Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 1, 2012, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated the first five-year
(‘‘sunset’’) review of the antidumping
duty order on certain polyester staple
fiber from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of a
notice of intent to participate and an
adequate substantive response filed on
behalf of the domestic interested party,
as well as a lack of response from
respondent interested parties, the
Department conducted an expedited
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of this
sunset review, the Department finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on certain polyester staple fiber
from the PRC would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2012 / Notices
DATES:
Effective Date: September 6,
2012.
Jerry
Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On May 1, 2012, the Department
initiated the first sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
polyester staple fiber from the PRC,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2).1 The
Department received a notice of intent
to participate from DAK Americas, LLC
(‘‘domestic interested party’’) within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i).2 The domestic
interested party claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the
Act, as manufacturers of a domestic like
product in the United States.
We received a complete substantive
response from the domestic interested
party within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).3
We received no responses from
respondent interested parties. As a
result, the Department conducted an
expedited sunset review of the Order,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain polyester staple fiber defined
under the scope of the order as synthetic
staple fibers, not carded, combed or
otherwise processed for spinning, of
polyesters measuring 3.3 decitex (3
denier, inclusive) or more in diameter.
This merchandise is cut to lengths
varying from one inch (25 millimeters
(‘‘mm’’)) to five inches (127 mm). The
subject merchandise may be coated,
usually with a silicon or other finish, or
not coated. Polyester staple fiber is
generally used as stuffing in sleeping
bags, mattresses, ski jackets, comforters,
cushions, pillows, and furniture.
Merchandise subject to the order is
currently classifiable in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) at subheadings
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review;
Correction, 77 FR 28355 (May 14, 2012).
2 See Letter from domestic interested party,
regarding: ‘‘Polyester Staple Fiber From China: Five
Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Duty
Order’’, dated May 16, 2012.
3 See Letter from domestic interested party,
regarding: ‘‘Polyester Staple Fiber From China: Five
Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Duty
Order’’, dated May 31, 2012.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:45 Sep 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
5503.20.0045 (3.3 to 13.2 decitex) and
5503.20.00.65 (13.2 decitex or greater).
Although the subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
our written description of the scope of
the order is dispositive.
The following products are excluded
from the scope: Polyester staple fiber of
less than 3.3 decitex (less than 3 denier)
currently classifiable in the HTSUS at
subheading 5503.20.00.25 and known to
the industry as polyester staple fiber for
spinning and generally used in woven
and knit applications to produce textile
and apparel products, PSF of 10 to 18
denier that are cut to lengths of 6 to 8
inches and that are generally used in the
manufacture of carpeting, and low-melt
polyester staple fiber defined as a bicomponent fiber with an outer, nonpolyester sheath that melts at a
significantly lower temperature than its
inner polyester core (classified at
HTSUS 5503.20.0015).
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from
the People’s Republic of China’’
(‘‘Decision Memorandum’’) from Gary
Taverman, Senior Advisor for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
dated concurrently with and hereby
adopted by this notice. The issues
discussed in the Decision Memorandum
include the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the order was to be revoked.
Parties may find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in the review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file
electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit room 7046 of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The signed Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the
order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and that the magnitudes of the margins
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
54899
of dumping likely to prevail are as
follows:
Exporter
Margin of
dumping
(percent)
Far Eastern Industries
(Shanghai) Ltd ....................
Cixi Sansheng Chemical Fiber
Co., Ltd ...............................
Cixi Waysun Chemical Fiber
Co., Ltd ...............................
Hangzhou Best Chemical
Fibre Co., Ltd ......................
Hangzhou Hanbang Chemical
Fibre Co., Ltd ......................
Hangzhou Huachuang Co.,
Ltd .......................................
Hangzhou Sanxin Paper Co.,
Ltd .......................................
Hangzhou Taifu Textile Fiber
Co., Ltd ...............................
Jiaxang Fuda Chemical Fibre
Factory ................................
Nantong Luolai Chemical
Fiber Co. Ltd .......................
Nanyang Textile Co., Ltd ........
Suzhou PolyFiber Co., Ltd .....
Xiamen Xianglu Fiber Chemical Co .................................
Zhaoqing Tifo New Fiber Co.,
Ltd .......................................
Zhejiang Anshun Pettechs
Fibre Co., Ltd ......................
Zhejiang Waysun Chemical
Fiber Co., Ltd ......................
PRC-Wide Rate ......................
3.47
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
44.30
Notice Regarding Administrative
Protective Order (‘‘APO’’)
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to APO of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return of
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
This sunset review and notice are in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),
and 771(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 29, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–22002 Filed 9–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54898-54899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-905]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 1, 2012, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated the first five-year (``sunset'') review of the
antidumping duty order on certain polyester staple fiber from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC'') pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). On the basis of a notice
of intent to participate and an adequate substantive response filed on
behalf of the domestic interested party, as well as a lack of response
from respondent interested parties, the Department conducted an
expedited sunset review of the antidumping duty order, pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As
a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of
the antidumping duty order on certain polyester staple fiber from the
PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at
the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this
notice.
[[Page 54899]]
DATES: Effective Date: September 6, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-4047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 1, 2012, the Department initiated the first sunset review of
the antidumping duty order on certain polyester staple fiber from the
PRC, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2).\1\
The Department received a notice of intent to participate from DAK
Americas, LLC (``domestic interested party'') within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\2\ The domestic interested party
claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as
manufacturers of a domestic like product in the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review; Correction,
77 FR 28355 (May 14, 2012).
\2\ See Letter from domestic interested party, regarding:
``Polyester Staple Fiber From China: Five Year (``Sunset'') Review
of Antidumping Duty Order'', dated May 16, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We received a complete substantive response from the domestic
interested party within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).\3\ We received no responses from respondent
interested parties. As a result, the Department conducted an expedited
sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Letter from domestic interested party, regarding:
``Polyester Staple Fiber From China: Five Year (``Sunset'') Review
of Antidumping Duty Order'', dated May 31, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is certain polyester staple
fiber defined under the scope of the order as synthetic staple fibers,
not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning, of polyesters
measuring 3.3 decitex (3 denier, inclusive) or more in diameter. This
merchandise is cut to lengths varying from one inch (25 millimeters
(``mm'')) to five inches (127 mm). The subject merchandise may be
coated, usually with a silicon or other finish, or not coated.
Polyester staple fiber is generally used as stuffing in sleeping bags,
mattresses, ski jackets, comforters, cushions, pillows, and furniture.
Merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') at
subheadings 5503.20.0045 (3.3 to 13.2 decitex) and 5503.20.00.65 (13.2
decitex or greater). Although the subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope
of the order is dispositive.
The following products are excluded from the scope: Polyester
staple fiber of less than 3.3 decitex (less than 3 denier) currently
classifiable in the HTSUS at subheading 5503.20.00.25 and known to the
industry as polyester staple fiber for spinning and generally used in
woven and knit applications to produce textile and apparel products,
PSF of 10 to 18 denier that are cut to lengths of 6 to 8 inches and
that are generally used in the manufacture of carpeting, and low-melt
polyester staple fiber defined as a bi-component fiber with an outer,
non-polyester sheath that melts at a significantly lower temperature
than its inner polyester core (classified at HTSUS 5503.20.0015).
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic
of China'' (``Decision Memorandum'') from Gary Taverman, Senior Advisor
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated concurrently with
and hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Decision
Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of
dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order
was to be revoked. Parties may find a complete discussion of all issues
raised in the review and the corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file electronically via Import
Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (``IA ACCESS''). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit room 7046 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on
the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The signed Decision Memorandum
and the electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the order would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of dumping and that the magnitudes of the
margins of dumping likely to prevail are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin of
Exporter dumping
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Far Eastern Industries (Shanghai) Ltd..................... 3.47
Cixi Sansheng Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd..................... 4.44
Cixi Waysun Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd....................... 4.44
Hangzhou Best Chemical Fibre Co., Ltd..................... 4.44
Hangzhou Hanbang Chemical Fibre Co., Ltd.................. 4.44
Hangzhou Huachuang Co., Ltd............................... 4.44
Hangzhou Sanxin Paper Co., Ltd............................ 4.44
Hangzhou Taifu Textile Fiber Co., Ltd..................... 4.44
Jiaxang Fuda Chemical Fibre Factory....................... 4.44
Nantong Luolai Chemical Fiber Co. Ltd..................... 4.44
Nanyang Textile Co., Ltd.................................. 4.44
Suzhou PolyFiber Co., Ltd................................. 4.44
Xiamen Xianglu Fiber Chemical Co.......................... 4.44
Zhaoqing Tifo New Fiber Co., Ltd.......................... 4.44
Zhejiang Anshun Pettechs Fibre Co., Ltd................... 4.44
Zhejiang Waysun Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd................... 4.44
PRC-Wide Rate............................................. 44.30
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice Regarding Administrative Protective Order (``APO'')
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305. Timely notification of the return of destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This sunset review and notice are in accordance with sections
751(c), 752(c), and 771(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 29, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-22002 Filed 9-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P