Certain Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, Including Power Over Ethernet Telephones, Switches, Wireless Access Points, Routers and Other Devices Used in LANs, and Cameras; Commission Determination Not to Review Initial Determinations Terminating Respondent Avaya Inc. Based on Settlement and Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation, 53234-53235 [2012-21491]

Download as PDF EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES 53234 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 170 / Friday, August 31, 2012 / Notices As requested by the USTR, the report will focus on services incidental to the development, generation, and distribution of renewable energy, with particular emphasis on wind energy (onshore and offshore) and solar energy, and other technologies that the Commission’s research shows to be of significance. The USTR defined such services to include scientific and technical consulting, services incidental to energy distribution, professional services, construction and engineering services, management consulting and related services, and maintenance and repair of equipment, among others. As requested, the Commission expects to deliver this second report to the USTR no later than June 28, 2013. Public Hearing: A public hearing in connection with this investigation will be held at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC, beginning at 9:30 a.m. on November 29, 2012. Requests to appear at the public hearing should be filed with the Secretary no later than 5:15 p.m., November 19, 2012. All prehearing briefs and statements should be filed no later than 5:15 p.m. November 6, 2012 and all post-hearing briefs and statements should be filed no later than 5:15 p.m., December 17, 2012. All preand post-hearing briefs and statements must be filed in accordance with the requirements in the ‘‘Written Submissions’’ section below. In the event that no witnesses are scheduled to appear at the hearing as of the close of business on November 15, 2012, the hearing will be canceled. Any person interested in attending the hearing as an observer or nonparticipant should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000 after November 1, 2012, for information concerning whether the hearing will be held. Written Submissions: In lieu of or in addition to participating in the hearing, interested parties are invited to file written submissions concerning this investigation. All written submissions (other than those related to the hearing) should be addressed to the Secretary, and should be received no later than 5:15 p.m., March 1, 2013. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 201.8 and the Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures require that interested parties file documents electronically on or before the filing deadline and submit eight (8) true paper copies by 12:00 p.m. eastern time on the next business day. In the event that confidential treatment of a document is requested, interested parties must file, at the same time as the VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Aug 30, 2012 Jkt 226001 eight paper copies, at least four (4) additional true paper copies in which the confidential information must be deleted (see the following paragraph for further information regarding confidential business information). Persons with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). Any submissions that contain confidential business information (CBI) must also conform with the requirements in section 201.6 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.6). Section 201.6 of the rules requires that the cover of the document and the individual pages be clearly marked as to whether they are the ‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘non-confidential’’ version, and that the confidential business information be clearly identified by means of brackets. All written submissions, except for confidential business information, will be made available for inspection by interested parties. In the request letter, the USTR stated that his office intends to make the Commission’s report available to the public in its entirety, and asked that the Commission not include any confidential business information or national security classified information in the report. Any confidential business information received by the Commission in this investigation and used in preparing this report will not be published in a manner that would reveal the operations of the firm supplying the information. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 27, 2012. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2012–21492 Filed 8–30–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–817] Certain Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, Including Power Over Ethernet Telephones, Switches, Wireless Access Points, Routers and Other Devices Used in LANs, and Cameras; Commission Determination Not to Review Initial Determinations Terminating Respondent Avaya Inc. Based on Settlement and Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ACTION: Notice. Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review two initial determinations (‘‘IDs’’) (Order Nos. 23–24) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting a joint motion by Complainant and Respondent Avaya Inc. (‘‘Avaya’’) to terminate the investigation for Respondent Avaya based on settlement and a motion by Complainant to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda S. Pitcher, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on December 7, 2011, based on a complaint filed by ChriMar Systems, Inc. d/b/a DMS Technologies (‘‘ChriMar’’) of Farmington Hills, Michigan. 76 FR 76436–37 (Dec. 7, 2011). The complaint alleges a violation of section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,457,250 by certain communication equipment, components thereof, and products containing the same, including power over ethernet telephones, switches, wireless access points, routers and other devices used in LANs, and cameras. The Notice of Investigation named a number of respondents, including Avaya of Basking Ridge, New Jersey; Cisco Consumer Products LLC of Irvine, California, Cisco Systems International B.V. of the Netherlands, Cisco-Linksys LLC of Irvine, California (collectively, ‘‘Cisco’’); Hewlett-Packard Co. (‘‘HP’’) of Palo Alto, California; and Extreme Networks, Inc. (‘‘Extreme’’) of Santa Clara, California. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 170 / Friday, August 31, 2012 / Notices On July 18, 2012, ChriMar and Avaya filed a joint motion to terminate respondent Avaya from the investigation based on settlement. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion and the remaining respondents did not oppose the motion. On August 1, 2012, the ALJ issued Order No. 23 granting the motion. ChriMar and Avaya represented that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between them. The ALJ found that there is no evidence that the settlement agreement would have an adverse impact on the public interest. No petitions for review of Order No. 23 were filed. On July 20, 2012, ChriMar filed a motion for termination of the investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint against respondents Cisco, Extreme and HP. Cisco, Extreme, HP and the Commission investigative attorney filed responses in support of the motion. On August 1, 2012, the ALJ granted ChriMar’s motion. Order No. 24. The ALJ found that there is good cause for termination based on withdrawal of the complaint. In addition, the ALJ stated that he is not aware of ‘‘extraordinary circumstances’’ that would preclude granting the motion to terminate. No petitions for review of Order No. 24 were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the IDs. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42–44 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–44). By order of the Commission. Issued: August 27, 2012. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2012–21491 Filed 8–30–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act Notice is hereby given that on August 24, 2012, a proposed consent decree in United States of America and Mecklenburg County v. Emerald Carolina Chemical, LLC, Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-00554, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. In this action the United States and Mecklenburg County sought civil penalties and injunctive relief for VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:22 Aug 30, 2012 Jkt 226001 alleged violations of Clean Air Act regulations at Emerald Carolina Chemical’s chemical processing plant at 8309 Wilkinson Boulevard, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. In particular, the complaint alleged violations of leak detection and repair requirements applicable to certain equipment at the plant. The proposed consent decree requires Emerald Carolina Chemical to pay a civil penalty of $62,500 to the United States and $62,500 to Mecklenburg County. Further, Emerald Carolina Chemical will implement additional inspection and monitoring procedures and analyze potential hazards associated with its amino resins and glyoxal production units. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either emailed to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States of America and Mecklenburg County v. Emerald Carolina Chemical, LLC, D.J. Ref. 90–5–2–1–09526. During the public comment period, the proposed consent decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, http:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or emailing a request to ‘‘Consent Decree Copy’’ (EESCDCopy.ENRD@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514–5271. If requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library by mail, please enclose a check in the amount of $11 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if requesting by email or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at the address given above. Henry Friedman, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 2012–21558 Filed 8–30–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 53235 LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Sunshine Act Meeting Notice The Institutional Advancement Committee of the Legal Services Corporation’s Board of Directors will meet telephonically on September 4, 2012. The meeting will commence at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, and will continue until the conclusion of the Committee’s agenda. LOCATION: F. William McCalpin Conference Room, Legal Services Corporation Headquarters, 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20007. PUBLIC OBSERVATION: Members of the public who are unable to attend in person but wish to listen to the public proceedings may do so by following the telephone call-in directions provided below but are asked to keep their telephones muted to eliminate background noises. To avoid disrupting the meeting, please refrain from placing the call on hold. From time to time, the presiding Chair may solicit comments from the public. CALL-IN DIRECTIONS FOR OPEN SESSIONS: • Call toll-free number: 1–866–451– 4981; • When prompted, enter the following numeric pass code: 5907707348. • When connected to the call, please immediately ‘‘MUTE’’ your telephone. STATUS OF MEETING: Open. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Approval of agenda 2. Approval of minutes of the Committee’s meeting of July 27, 2012 3. Consider and act on the Development Plan 4. Public comment 5. Consider and act on other business 6. Consider and act on motion to adjourn the meeting CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Katherine Ward, Executive Assistant to the Vice President & General Counsel, at (202) 295–1500. Questions may be sent by electronic mail to FR_NOTICE_QUESTIONS@lsc.gov. NON-CONFIDENTIAL MEETING MATERIALS: Non-confidential meeting materials will be made available in electronic format at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting on the LSC Web site, at http:// www.lsc.gov/board-directors/meetings/ board-meeting-notices/non-confidentialmaterials-be-considered-open-session. ACCESSIBILITY: LSC complies with the Americans With Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. Upon request, meeting notices and DATE AND TIME: E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53234-53235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-817]


Certain Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products 
Containing the Same, Including Power Over Ethernet Telephones, 
Switches, Wireless Access Points, Routers and Other Devices Used in 
LANs, and Cameras; Commission Determination Not to Review Initial 
Determinations Terminating Respondent Avaya Inc. Based on Settlement 
and Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; 
Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review two initial determinations 
(``IDs'') (Order Nos. 23-24) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting a joint motion by Complainant and Respondent Avaya 
Inc. (``Avaya'') to terminate the investigation for Respondent Avaya 
based on settlement and a motion by Complainant to terminate the 
investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda S. Pitcher, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on December 7, 2011, based on a complaint filed by ChriMar Systems, 
Inc. d/b/a DMS Technologies (``ChriMar'') of Farmington Hills, 
Michigan. 76 FR 76436-37 (Dec. 7, 2011). The complaint alleges a 
violation of section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of 
U.S. Patent No. 7,457,250 by certain communication equipment, 
components thereof, and products containing the same, including power 
over ethernet telephones, switches, wireless access points, routers and 
other devices used in LANs, and cameras. The Notice of Investigation 
named a number of respondents, including Avaya of Basking Ridge, New 
Jersey; Cisco Consumer Products LLC of Irvine, California, Cisco 
Systems International B.V. of the Netherlands, Cisco-Linksys LLC of 
Irvine, California (collectively, ``Cisco''); Hewlett-Packard Co. 
(``HP'') of Palo Alto, California; and Extreme Networks, Inc. 
(``Extreme'') of Santa Clara, California.

[[Page 53235]]

    On July 18, 2012, ChriMar and Avaya filed a joint motion to 
terminate respondent Avaya from the investigation based on settlement. 
The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of 
the motion and the remaining respondents did not oppose the motion. On 
August 1, 2012, the ALJ issued Order No. 23 granting the motion. 
ChriMar and Avaya represented that there are no other agreements, 
written or oral, express or implied, between them. The ALJ found that 
there is no evidence that the settlement agreement would have an 
adverse impact on the public interest. No petitions for review of Order 
No. 23 were filed.
    On July 20, 2012, ChriMar filed a motion for termination of the 
investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint 
against respondents Cisco, Extreme and HP. Cisco, Extreme, HP and the 
Commission investigative attorney filed responses in support of the 
motion. On August 1, 2012, the ALJ granted ChriMar's motion. Order No. 
24. The ALJ found that there is good cause for termination based on 
withdrawal of the complaint. In addition, the ALJ stated that he is not 
aware of ``extraordinary circumstances'' that would preclude granting 
the motion to terminate. No petitions for review of Order No. 24 were 
filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the IDs.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42-44 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-44).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 27, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-21491 Filed 8-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P