Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Implementing Changes to the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule Relating to the Monthly Cost for an Amex Trading Permit and Monthly Fees Relating to Trading in Premium Products, 49038-49040 [2012-19985]
Download as PDF
49038
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2012 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
[Release No. 34–67634; File No. SR–
NYSEMKT–2012–33]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Implementing Changes to
the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule
Relating to the Monthly Cost for an
Amex Trading Permit and Monthly
Fees Relating to Trading in Premium
Products
August 9, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on August
1, 2012, NYSE MKT LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to (i) change the
monthly cost for an Amex Trading
Permit (‘‘ATP’’), and (ii) introduce a
group of 10 issues, to be known as
Premium Products, that will carry a
monthly fee for certain NYSE Amex
Options Market Makers that trade them.
The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
1 15
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Aug 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
1. Purpose
NYSE MKT proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule to (i) change the monthly
cost for an ATP, and (ii) introduce a
group of 10 issues, to be known as
Premium Products, that will carry a
monthly fee for certain NYSE Amex
Options Market Makers that trade them.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
amend the monthly cost for ATPs that
are required by an NYSE Amex Options
Market Maker in creating their
appointment for those options for which
they want to submit electronic
quotations to the Exchange. Presently,
each ATP that a NYSE Amex Options
Market Maker has during a month
carries a charge of $5,000 per month.
The Exchange will adopt a sliding scale
for ATPs as follows:
1st ATP = $8,000
2nd ATP = $6,000
3rd ATP = $5,000
4th ATP = $4,000
5th ATP = $3,000
For additional ATPs beyond five, the
monthly fee will be $2,000 for each
ATP.
A Floor Market Maker 4 will be
permitted to purchase up to two ATPs
at a lower rate of $5,000 for each such
ATP (i.e., lower than the $8,000 or
$6,000 monthly rate for the first and
second ATP, respectively, set forth
above) if certain requirements are met.
Specifically, the lower fees will only be
available if the Floor Market Maker has
no more than two ATPs in any month
and transacts at least 75% of its Market
Maker volume manually, by public
outcry (excluding Qualified Contingent
Cross and Strategy Executions). Such a
Floor Market Maker may continue to
submit quotes electronically through an
auto-quoting device, subject to the
requirement to execute at least 75% of
contract volume via public outcry.
Concurrent with this change, the
Exchange will introduce a list of 10
Premium Products that will carry a
monthly fee for any NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker who transacts in
them, except those Floor Market Makers
subject to the lower ATP fees previously
described. The proposed fee is $1,000
4 A Floor Market Maker is a registered Market
Maker who makes transactions as a dealer-specialist
while on the Floor of the Exchange and provides
quotations (A) manually, by public outcry, and (B)
electronically through an auto-quoting device. See
Rule 900.2NY(29).
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
per product traded with a monthly cap
of $7,000. The 10 Premium Products are
SPY, AAPL, IWM, QQQ, BAC, EEM,
GLD, JPM, XLF, and VXX. Any change
to the list of Premium Products would
be done through a fee filing.
The proposed changes will be
operative on August 1, 2012.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6(b) 5 of the
Act, in general, and Section 6(b)(4) 6 of
the Act, in particular, in that it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and
other persons using its facilities.
The proposed changes in NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker ATP fees from a
fixed fee of $5,000 per month per permit
to a sliding scale that ranges from
$8,000 per month for the first ATP to
$2,000 per month for each additional
ATP beyond five ATPs is reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory for the following
reasons. First, the proposed change is
both reasonable and equitable when
viewed in light of the cost for a market
maker on at least two other exchanges
to obtain a sufficient number of trading
permits or rights to quote a similar
number of names. For example, on the
International Securities Exchange
(‘‘ISE’’), a Competitive Market Maker
(‘‘CMM’’) is required to have nine CMM
Trading Rights in order to quote all
issues on the ISE.7 CMM Trading Rights
on the ISE are fixed in terms of the
number that are available and must be
bought or leased from someone who
possesses them. The last sale for a CMM
Trading Right on the ISE was for
$1,550,000 on November 30, 2009.8 As
of July 17, 2012, there appeared to be a
total of seven CMM Trading Rights
available for sale or lease, which are two
fewer than the number required to quote
all issues on the ISE.9 The Exchange
estimates that the monthly lease cost is
somewhere in the range of $7,000 to
$11,000 per month.10 Assuming the
5 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
7 See ISE Rule 802(c) and https://www.ise.com/
WebForm/viewPage.aspx?categoryId=563.
8 See Secondary Market Sales after May 1, 2002,
available at https://www.ise.com/WebForm/
viewPage.aspx?categoryId=222.
9 See https://www.ise.com/WebForm/
viewPage.aspx?categoryId=563.
10 Based on the last reported sale of $1,550,000,
if one uses five-year straight-line depreciation, the
monthly cost of a single CMM Trading Right is
$25,833. In light of this, coupled with decreased
volumes in the industry, the Exchange believes that
a lease rate of between $7,000 and $11,000 per
month per CMM Trading Right is a reasonable
6 15
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
best-case scenario of being able to obtain
a lease at the most favorable price for
each of the nine CMM Trading Rights
needed to quote every name on ISE, the
Exchange estimates that it would cost a
market maker approximately $63,000
per month in rights fees. By comparison,
under the proposal, a NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker will pay $23,000
per month in rights fees to quote the
entire universe of names on the
Exchange.
A further comparison may be made
with the Chicago Board Options
Exchange (‘‘CBOE’’) and the trading
permit costs for a market maker to create
an assignment there. CBOE has a sliding
scale for Trading Permit Holders
(‘‘TPHs’’) who are acting as market
makers. The sliding scale is $5,500 per
month for permits one to 10, $4,000 per
month for permits 11 to 22 [sic], and
$2,500 for permits 21 and higher. The
discounted permit rates of $4,000 and
$2,500 are only available to TPHs who
commit to a full year of that number of
permits. In configuring an appointment
on CBOE, a market maker incurs an
appointment cost for each option in its
appointment based on various tiers.11
The appointment cost can be calculated
using an ‘‘appointment calculator’’
provided to TPHs.12 The Exchange used
the appointment calculator dated July
10, 2012 to calculate the cost to
construct a market maker appointment
consisting of all 2,196 options traded on
the Exchange as of June 30, 2012. The
result shows that a total of 28 trading
permits would be required to create a
market maker appointment on CBOE
that consisted of all options traded on
the Exchange.13 Assuming the best-case
scenario in which a market maker
committed to a full year of utilizing 28
permits, a market maker on CBOE
would pay $115,000 per month in
permit costs or $92,000 more per month
than an NYSE Amex Options Market
Maker would pay under the proposal.
The Exchange further notes that by
virtue of the limited number of CMM
Trading Rights available for sale or lease
on ISE and the Class Quoting Limit
(‘‘CQL’’) 14 on CBOE, the barriers to
entry on both exchanges for a market
maker are quite high in that it may not
be possible to create a market maker
estimate and has confirmed that estimate informally
with market participants.
11 See CBOE Rule 8.3.
12 The appointment calculator is available at
https://www.cboe.org/publish/SeatCalculator/
SeatCalcUpdated071012.xlt.
13 Of the 2,196 options traded on the Exchange as
of June 30, 2012, 2,000 were trading on the CBOE,
and it would require 28 TPHs to create an
appointment in those names.
14 See CBOE Rule 8.3A.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Aug 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
appointment of one’s choosing due to
either a lack of available CMM Trading
Rights on ISE or a CQL on CBOE that
has been reached. Under the Exchange’s
proposal, no such artificial barrier to
entry will be created, and coupled with
the relatively lower monthly cost to
acquire ATPs, the proposal is both
reasonable and equitable.
A second aspect of the proposed
change in the monthly ATP cost that
needs to be considered is that while a
total of four ATPs are required under
the proposal to quote all options on the
Exchange, in practice some participants
have more than the maximum number
of ATPs required. Typically this is done
for accounting or risk management
purposes within an ATP Holder’s
organization. Under the proposal, the
fifth ATP is reduced in cost from $5,000
per month to $3,000 per month, and
ATPs beyond the fifth ATP are reduced
in cost from $5,000 per month to $2,000
per month. This is both reasonable and
equitable given that acquiring additional
ATPs beyond the four required to quote
all options on the Exchange is likely to
be for purely accounting or risk
management purposes. As this aspect of
the proposal applies to all NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker ATPs equally, it
is not unfairly discriminatory.
The Exchange’s proposal to adopt
lower fees for certain Floor Market
Makers who purchase an ATP is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory for the following
reasons. First, the Exchange believes
that open or public outcry markets serve
an important role in the price discovery
process that benefits all participants on
the Exchange and in the marketplace.
Presently, there are 41 entities that have
109 market making ATPs on the
Exchange, ranging from one ATP to 10
ATPs per entity. Of these 41 entities, 10
have Floor Market Makers, with six of
the 10 having one Floor Market Maker
each. In light of its desire to foster the
price discovery process via public
outcry markets, the Exchange believes
that it is reasonable and equitable to
establish a slightly discounted ATP fee
for Floor Market Makers, which will be
$5,000 per month for each ATP, with a
maximum of two such ATPs (or $10,000
in that case). By contrast under the
proposal, an NYSE Amex Options
Market Maker will pay $8,000 for the
first ATP and $6,000 for the second
ATP, for a total of $14,000. To ensure
the Floor Market Maker ATP is being
used to foster price discovery in public
outcry markets, the Exchange has
proposed to limit the availability of the
lower fees to those Floor Market Makers
who conduct at least 75% of their
contract volume manually, by public
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49039
outcry, and who do not utilize more
than two ATPs for market making in a
given month. The latter restriction is
designed to encourage participation in
public outcry from smaller brokerdealers looking to begin market making,
which will encourage competition. The
proposal is not unfairly discriminatory
as it is available to any NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker who wishes to
contribute to public outcry markets such
that at least 75% of its contract volumes
are executed in public outcry. Those
NYSE Amex Options Market Makers
who have no desire to engage in public
outcry trading are not being
disadvantaged, as public outcry trading
cannot take place at prices that are
inferior to the electronic quotations
submitted by an NYSE Amex Options
Market Maker.
The Exchange’s proposal to adopt a
Premium Product Issues List and the
associated monthly NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker Fee of $1,000 per
issue with a $7,000 per month cap is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory for the following
reasons. The Exchange does not limit
the number of participants who may act
as market makers, either electronically
or in public outcry. This is in direct
contrast to, for example, the ISE and
CBOE, which have a limited number of
CMM Trading Rights and a CQL,
respectively. The result is that the
Exchange has more than sufficient
liquidity in the most active options on
the Exchange as evidenced by its market
share in those options. By adopting a
Premium Product Issues List, which is
comprised of many of the most active
issues on the Exchange, and a
corresponding monthly fee applicable to
NYSE Amex Options Market Makers
who transact in any of those names, the
Exchange intends to encourage
meaningful market maker participation
in these names.
For example, presently it would be
permissible within Exchange rules for
an NYSE Amex Options Market Maker
to send in a quote that is $1 bid for one
contract, offered at $6 for one contract
in the at-the-money series in SPY. Such
a quote, while permitted under
Exchange rules, has an extremely low
probability of ever being executed
against, although if it were to happen,
it quite likely would be viewed as
somewhat of a ‘‘windfall’’ from the
market maker’s profitability perspective.
Such a quote, however, is also required
to be processed by the Exchange,
despite the low probability of the quote
ever being executed against. By
adopting the Premium Product Issues
List and the associated monthly fee
applicable to NYSE Amex Options
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
49040
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2012 / Notices
Market Makers who transact in a
Premium Product issue, ‘‘less
meaningful’’ quoting activity as
described above should become less
common given the economics of the
proposal. Furthermore, the notion of
‘‘premium’’ or ‘‘select’’ pricing for a
subset of issues traded on an Exchange
is not novel. For example, both the ISE
and Nasdaq OMX PHLX exchanges
feature ‘‘select’’ symbol lists on their
respective fee schedules.15
The Premium Product Issues List will
apply to all NYSE Amex Options Market
Makers equally, except for those market
makers who are eligible for the newly
proposed reduced Floor Market Maker
ATP fees, one of the requirements of
which is that they achieve 75% or more
of their volumes in public outcry.
Excluding market makers who are
subject to these lower fees is in keeping
with the Exchange’s stated goals of
continuing to foster price discovery
through public outcry while at the same
time reducing the instances of ‘‘less
meaningful’’ electronic quotes in the
more liquid names that comprise the
Premium Product Issues List. For these
reasons, the Exchange believes that the
proposal is reasonable, equitable, and
not unfairly discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 16 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 17
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
NYSE MKT.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
15 See ISE Fee Schedule dated July 6, 2012,
available at https://www.ise.com/assets/documents/
OptionsExchange/legal/fee/fee_schedule.pdf, and
the Nasdaq OMX PHLX Fee Schedule dated July 2,
2012, available at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
Micro.aspx?id=PHLXPricing.
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Aug 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2012–33 and should be
submitted on or before September 5,
2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19985 Filed 8–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–33 on the
subject line.
[Release No. 34–67633; File No. SR–Phlx–
2012–104]
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR—NYSEMKT–2012–33. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090 on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will
also be available for inspection and
copying at the Exchange’s principal
office and on its Internet Web site at
www.nyse.com. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
August 9, 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Pricing in Select Symbols and Multiply
Listed Options
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that, on August
1, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Section I of the Exchange’s Pricing
Schedule titled ‘‘Rebates and Fees for
Adding and Removing Liquidity in
Select Symbols,’’ to amend various
Select Symbols,3 increase certain
Complex Order 4 Rebates for Adding
Liquidity, eliminate the Complex Order
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The rebates and fees in Section I apply to certain
Select Symbols which are listed in Section I of the
Pricing Schedule.
4 A Complex Order is any order involving the
simultaneous purchase and/or sale of two or more
different options series in the same underlying
security, priced at a net debit or credit based on the
relative prices of the individual components, for the
same account, for the purpose of executing a
particular investment strategy. Furthermore, a
Complex Order can also be a stock-option order,
which is an order to buy or sell a stated number
of units of an underlying stock or exchange-traded
fund (‘‘ETF’’) coupled with the purchase or sale of
options contract(s). See Exchange Rule 1080,
Commentary .08(a)(i).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49038-49040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19985]
[[Page 49038]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-67634; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2012-33]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Implementing Changes to
the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule Relating to the Monthly Cost for an
Amex Trading Permit and Monthly Fees Relating to Trading in Premium
Products
August 9, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on August 1, 2012, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') to (i) change the monthly cost for an Amex Trading
Permit (``ATP''), and (ii) introduce a group of 10 issues, to be known
as Premium Products, that will carry a monthly fee for certain NYSE
Amex Options Market Makers that trade them. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
NYSE MKT proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to (i) change the
monthly cost for an ATP, and (ii) introduce a group of 10 issues, to be
known as Premium Products, that will carry a monthly fee for certain
NYSE Amex Options Market Makers that trade them.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend the monthly cost for
ATPs that are required by an NYSE Amex Options Market Maker in creating
their appointment for those options for which they want to submit
electronic quotations to the Exchange. Presently, each ATP that a NYSE
Amex Options Market Maker has during a month carries a charge of $5,000
per month. The Exchange will adopt a sliding scale for ATPs as follows:
1st ATP = $8,000
2nd ATP = $6,000
3rd ATP = $5,000
4th ATP = $4,000
5th ATP = $3,000
For additional ATPs beyond five, the monthly fee will be $2,000 for
each ATP.
A Floor Market Maker \4\ will be permitted to purchase up to two
ATPs at a lower rate of $5,000 for each such ATP (i.e., lower than the
$8,000 or $6,000 monthly rate for the first and second ATP,
respectively, set forth above) if certain requirements are met.
Specifically, the lower fees will only be available if the Floor Market
Maker has no more than two ATPs in any month and transacts at least 75%
of its Market Maker volume manually, by public outcry (excluding
Qualified Contingent Cross and Strategy Executions). Such a Floor
Market Maker may continue to submit quotes electronically through an
auto-quoting device, subject to the requirement to execute at least 75%
of contract volume via public outcry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A Floor Market Maker is a registered Market Maker who makes
transactions as a dealer-specialist while on the Floor of the
Exchange and provides quotations (A) manually, by public outcry, and
(B) electronically through an auto-quoting device. See Rule
900.2NY(29).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concurrent with this change, the Exchange will introduce a list of
10 Premium Products that will carry a monthly fee for any NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker who transacts in them, except those Floor Market
Makers subject to the lower ATP fees previously described. The proposed
fee is $1,000 per product traded with a monthly cap of $7,000. The 10
Premium Products are SPY, AAPL, IWM, QQQ, BAC, EEM, GLD, JPM, XLF, and
VXX. Any change to the list of Premium Products would be done through a
fee filing.
The proposed changes will be operative on August 1, 2012.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) \5\ of the Act, in general, and
Section 6(b)(4) \6\ of the Act, in particular, in that it is designed
to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed changes in NYSE Amex Options Market Maker ATP fees
from a fixed fee of $5,000 per month per permit to a sliding scale that
ranges from $8,000 per month for the first ATP to $2,000 per month for
each additional ATP beyond five ATPs is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory for the following reasons. First, the proposed
change is both reasonable and equitable when viewed in light of the
cost for a market maker on at least two other exchanges to obtain a
sufficient number of trading permits or rights to quote a similar
number of names. For example, on the International Securities Exchange
(``ISE''), a Competitive Market Maker (``CMM'') is required to have
nine CMM Trading Rights in order to quote all issues on the ISE.\7\ CMM
Trading Rights on the ISE are fixed in terms of the number that are
available and must be bought or leased from someone who possesses them.
The last sale for a CMM Trading Right on the ISE was for $1,550,000 on
November 30, 2009.\8\ As of July 17, 2012, there appeared to be a total
of seven CMM Trading Rights available for sale or lease, which are two
fewer than the number required to quote all issues on the ISE.\9\ The
Exchange estimates that the monthly lease cost is somewhere in the
range of $7,000 to $11,000 per month.\10\ Assuming the
[[Page 49039]]
best-case scenario of being able to obtain a lease at the most
favorable price for each of the nine CMM Trading Rights needed to quote
every name on ISE, the Exchange estimates that it would cost a market
maker approximately $63,000 per month in rights fees. By comparison,
under the proposal, a NYSE Amex Options Market Maker will pay $23,000
per month in rights fees to quote the entire universe of names on the
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See ISE Rule 802(c) and https://www.ise.com/WebForm/viewPage.aspx?categoryId=563.
\8\ See Secondary Market Sales after May 1, 2002, available at
https://www.ise.com/WebForm/viewPage.aspx?categoryId=222.
\9\ See https://www.ise.com/WebForm/viewPage.aspx?categoryId=563.
\10\ Based on the last reported sale of $1,550,000, if one uses
five-year straight-line depreciation, the monthly cost of a single
CMM Trading Right is $25,833. In light of this, coupled with
decreased volumes in the industry, the Exchange believes that a
lease rate of between $7,000 and $11,000 per month per CMM Trading
Right is a reasonable estimate and has confirmed that estimate
informally with market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A further comparison may be made with the Chicago Board Options
Exchange (``CBOE'') and the trading permit costs for a market maker to
create an assignment there. CBOE has a sliding scale for Trading Permit
Holders (``TPHs'') who are acting as market makers. The sliding scale
is $5,500 per month for permits one to 10, $4,000 per month for permits
11 to 22 [sic], and $2,500 for permits 21 and higher. The discounted
permit rates of $4,000 and $2,500 are only available to TPHs who commit
to a full year of that number of permits. In configuring an appointment
on CBOE, a market maker incurs an appointment cost for each option in
its appointment based on various tiers.\11\ The appointment cost can be
calculated using an ``appointment calculator'' provided to TPHs.\12\
The Exchange used the appointment calculator dated July 10, 2012 to
calculate the cost to construct a market maker appointment consisting
of all 2,196 options traded on the Exchange as of June 30, 2012. The
result shows that a total of 28 trading permits would be required to
create a market maker appointment on CBOE that consisted of all options
traded on the Exchange.\13\ Assuming the best-case scenario in which a
market maker committed to a full year of utilizing 28 permits, a market
maker on CBOE would pay $115,000 per month in permit costs or $92,000
more per month than an NYSE Amex Options Market Maker would pay under
the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See CBOE Rule 8.3.
\12\ The appointment calculator is available at https://www.cboe.org/publish/SeatCalculator/SeatCalcUpdated071012.xlt.
\13\ Of the 2,196 options traded on the Exchange as of June 30,
2012, 2,000 were trading on the CBOE, and it would require 28 TPHs
to create an appointment in those names.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further notes that by virtue of the limited number of
CMM Trading Rights available for sale or lease on ISE and the Class
Quoting Limit (``CQL'') \14\ on CBOE, the barriers to entry on both
exchanges for a market maker are quite high in that it may not be
possible to create a market maker appointment of one's choosing due to
either a lack of available CMM Trading Rights on ISE or a CQL on CBOE
that has been reached. Under the Exchange's proposal, no such
artificial barrier to entry will be created, and coupled with the
relatively lower monthly cost to acquire ATPs, the proposal is both
reasonable and equitable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See CBOE Rule 8.3A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A second aspect of the proposed change in the monthly ATP cost that
needs to be considered is that while a total of four ATPs are required
under the proposal to quote all options on the Exchange, in practice
some participants have more than the maximum number of ATPs required.
Typically this is done for accounting or risk management purposes
within an ATP Holder's organization. Under the proposal, the fifth ATP
is reduced in cost from $5,000 per month to $3,000 per month, and ATPs
beyond the fifth ATP are reduced in cost from $5,000 per month to
$2,000 per month. This is both reasonable and equitable given that
acquiring additional ATPs beyond the four required to quote all options
on the Exchange is likely to be for purely accounting or risk
management purposes. As this aspect of the proposal applies to all NYSE
Amex Options Market Maker ATPs equally, it is not unfairly
discriminatory.
The Exchange's proposal to adopt lower fees for certain Floor
Market Makers who purchase an ATP is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory for the following reasons. First, the Exchange
believes that open or public outcry markets serve an important role in
the price discovery process that benefits all participants on the
Exchange and in the marketplace. Presently, there are 41 entities that
have 109 market making ATPs on the Exchange, ranging from one ATP to 10
ATPs per entity. Of these 41 entities, 10 have Floor Market Makers,
with six of the 10 having one Floor Market Maker each. In light of its
desire to foster the price discovery process via public outcry markets,
the Exchange believes that it is reasonable and equitable to establish
a slightly discounted ATP fee for Floor Market Makers, which will be
$5,000 per month for each ATP, with a maximum of two such ATPs (or
$10,000 in that case). By contrast under the proposal, an NYSE Amex
Options Market Maker will pay $8,000 for the first ATP and $6,000 for
the second ATP, for a total of $14,000. To ensure the Floor Market
Maker ATP is being used to foster price discovery in public outcry
markets, the Exchange has proposed to limit the availability of the
lower fees to those Floor Market Makers who conduct at least 75% of
their contract volume manually, by public outcry, and who do not
utilize more than two ATPs for market making in a given month. The
latter restriction is designed to encourage participation in public
outcry from smaller broker-dealers looking to begin market making,
which will encourage competition. The proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory as it is available to any NYSE Amex Options Market Maker
who wishes to contribute to public outcry markets such that at least
75% of its contract volumes are executed in public outcry. Those NYSE
Amex Options Market Makers who have no desire to engage in public
outcry trading are not being disadvantaged, as public outcry trading
cannot take place at prices that are inferior to the electronic
quotations submitted by an NYSE Amex Options Market Maker.
The Exchange's proposal to adopt a Premium Product Issues List and
the associated monthly NYSE Amex Options Market Maker Fee of $1,000 per
issue with a $7,000 per month cap is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory for the following reasons. The Exchange does
not limit the number of participants who may act as market makers,
either electronically or in public outcry. This is in direct contrast
to, for example, the ISE and CBOE, which have a limited number of CMM
Trading Rights and a CQL, respectively. The result is that the Exchange
has more than sufficient liquidity in the most active options on the
Exchange as evidenced by its market share in those options. By adopting
a Premium Product Issues List, which is comprised of many of the most
active issues on the Exchange, and a corresponding monthly fee
applicable to NYSE Amex Options Market Makers who transact in any of
those names, the Exchange intends to encourage meaningful market maker
participation in these names.
For example, presently it would be permissible within Exchange
rules for an NYSE Amex Options Market Maker to send in a quote that is
$1 bid for one contract, offered at $6 for one contract in the at-the-
money series in SPY. Such a quote, while permitted under Exchange
rules, has an extremely low probability of ever being executed against,
although if it were to happen, it quite likely would be viewed as
somewhat of a ``windfall'' from the market maker's profitability
perspective. Such a quote, however, is also required to be processed by
the Exchange, despite the low probability of the quote ever being
executed against. By adopting the Premium Product Issues List and the
associated monthly fee applicable to NYSE Amex Options
[[Page 49040]]
Market Makers who transact in a Premium Product issue, ``less
meaningful'' quoting activity as described above should become less
common given the economics of the proposal. Furthermore, the notion of
``premium'' or ``select'' pricing for a subset of issues traded on an
Exchange is not novel. For example, both the ISE and Nasdaq OMX PHLX
exchanges feature ``select'' symbol lists on their respective fee
schedules.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See ISE Fee Schedule dated July 6, 2012, available at
https://www.ise.com/assets/documents/OptionsExchange/legal/fee/fee_schedule.pdf, and the Nasdaq OMX PHLX Fee Schedule dated July 2,
2012, available at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Micro.aspx?id=PHLXPricing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Premium Product Issues List will apply to all NYSE Amex Options
Market Makers equally, except for those market makers who are eligible
for the newly proposed reduced Floor Market Maker ATP fees, one of the
requirements of which is that they achieve 75% or more of their volumes
in public outcry. Excluding market makers who are subject to these
lower fees is in keeping with the Exchange's stated goals of continuing
to foster price discovery through public outcry while at the same time
reducing the instances of ``less meaningful'' electronic quotes in the
more liquid names that comprise the Premium Product Issues List. For
these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \16\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \17\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the NYSE MKT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2012-33 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR--NYSEMKT-2012-33. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090 on official business days between the
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available
for inspection and copying at the Exchange's principal office and on
its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2012-33 and should be submitted
on or before September 5, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19985 Filed 8-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P