Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Pricing in Select Symbols and Multiply Listed Options, 49040-49044 [2012-19984]
Download as PDF
49040
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2012 / Notices
Market Makers who transact in a
Premium Product issue, ‘‘less
meaningful’’ quoting activity as
described above should become less
common given the economics of the
proposal. Furthermore, the notion of
‘‘premium’’ or ‘‘select’’ pricing for a
subset of issues traded on an Exchange
is not novel. For example, both the ISE
and Nasdaq OMX PHLX exchanges
feature ‘‘select’’ symbol lists on their
respective fee schedules.15
The Premium Product Issues List will
apply to all NYSE Amex Options Market
Makers equally, except for those market
makers who are eligible for the newly
proposed reduced Floor Market Maker
ATP fees, one of the requirements of
which is that they achieve 75% or more
of their volumes in public outcry.
Excluding market makers who are
subject to these lower fees is in keeping
with the Exchange’s stated goals of
continuing to foster price discovery
through public outcry while at the same
time reducing the instances of ‘‘less
meaningful’’ electronic quotes in the
more liquid names that comprise the
Premium Product Issues List. For these
reasons, the Exchange believes that the
proposal is reasonable, equitable, and
not unfairly discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 16 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 17
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
NYSE MKT.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
15 See ISE Fee Schedule dated July 6, 2012,
available at https://www.ise.com/assets/documents/
OptionsExchange/legal/fee/fee_schedule.pdf, and
the Nasdaq OMX PHLX Fee Schedule dated July 2,
2012, available at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
Micro.aspx?id=PHLXPricing.
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Aug 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2012–33 and should be
submitted on or before September 5,
2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19985 Filed 8–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–33 on the
subject line.
[Release No. 34–67633; File No. SR–Phlx–
2012–104]
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR—NYSEMKT–2012–33. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090 on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will
also be available for inspection and
copying at the Exchange’s principal
office and on its Internet Web site at
www.nyse.com. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
August 9, 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Pricing in Select Symbols and Multiply
Listed Options
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that, on August
1, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Section I of the Exchange’s Pricing
Schedule titled ‘‘Rebates and Fees for
Adding and Removing Liquidity in
Select Symbols,’’ to amend various
Select Symbols,3 increase certain
Complex Order 4 Rebates for Adding
Liquidity, eliminate the Complex Order
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The rebates and fees in Section I apply to certain
Select Symbols which are listed in Section I of the
Pricing Schedule.
4 A Complex Order is any order involving the
simultaneous purchase and/or sale of two or more
different options series in the same underlying
security, priced at a net debit or credit based on the
relative prices of the individual components, for the
same account, for the purpose of executing a
particular investment strategy. Furthermore, a
Complex Order can also be a stock-option order,
which is an order to buy or sell a stated number
of units of an underlying stock or exchange-traded
fund (‘‘ETF’’) coupled with the purchase or sale of
options contract(s). See Exchange Rule 1080,
Commentary .08(a)(i).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2012 / Notices
Fees for Adding Liquidity, increase
certain Complex Order Fees for
Removing Liquidity, and eliminate a
discount applicable to Customer
Complex Order Rebates, and make
technical corrections to ‘‘Part B.
Complex Order’’ in Section I. The
Exchange also proposes to amend
Section II of the Pricing Schedule titled
‘‘Multiply Listed Options Fees’’ to
decrease the threshold amount which
entitles members to a reduced Firm
Electronic Options Transaction Charges
in Penny Pilot and non-Penny Pilot
Options and amend the Customer
Rebate Program.5
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend Sections I and II of
the Exchange’s Pricing Schedule.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing
to amend Section I of the Pricing
Schedule to amend the Select Symbols,
increase certain Complex Order Rebates
for Adding Liquidity, eliminate
Complex Order Fees for Adding
Liquidity, increase certain Complex
Order Fees for Removing Liquidity,
eliminate a discount applicable to
options overlying SPDR S&P 500
(‘‘SPY’’),6 and to make other technical
amendments. The Exchange is
proposing to amend Section II of the
5 Section II includes options overlying equities,
ETFs, ETNs, indexes, and HOLDRs which are
Multiply Listed.
6 SPY is one of the Select Symbols subject to the
rebates and fees in Section I. A complete list of
Select Symbols is included in Section I of the
Pricing Schedule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Aug 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
Pricing Schedule to decrease the
threshold to receive the reduced Firm
Electronic Options Transaction Charges
in Penny Pilot and non-Penny Pilot
Options and to amend the Customer
Rebates Program. Each amendment will
be described in more detail below.
Section I Amendments
Select Symbols
The Exchange displays a list of Select
Symbols in its Pricing Schedule at
Section I, which symbols are subject to
the rebates and fees in that section. The
Exchange is proposing to add the
following symbol to the list of Select
Symbols in Section I of the Pricing
Schedule: Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(‘‘ARNA’’). The Exchange is also
proposing to delete the following
symbols from the list of Select Symbols
in Section I of the Pricing Schedule:
Dell Inc. (‘‘DELL’’), and Newmont
Mining Corp. (‘‘NEM’’ (collectively,
‘‘Proposed Deleted Symbols’’). These
Proposed Deleted Symbols would be
subject to the rebates and fees in Section
II of the Pricing Schedule entitled
‘‘Multiply Listed Options Fees.’’ The
Exchange believes that by adding and
removing the above-referenced symbols
in Section I of the Pricing Schedule the
Exchange will continue to attract order
flow to the Exchange.
Complex Order Fees
The Exchange is proposing to increase
the Complex Order Rebates for Adding
Liquidity from $0.00 to $0.10 for
Specialists,7 Market Makers,8 Firms,
Broker-Dealers and Professionals.9
Additionally, the Exchange is proposing
to eliminate Complex Order Fees for
Adding Liquidity. The Exchange
believes that these fees are no longer
necessary and proposes to uniformly
eliminate them for all market
participants. The Exchange believes that
the increase to the Complex Order
Rebates for Adding Liquidity coupled
with the elimination of the Complex
Order Fees for Adding Liquidity will
incentivize market participants to
transact additional Complex Order flow
on the Exchange.
7A
Specialist is an Exchange member who is
registered as an options specialist pursuant to Rule
1020(a).
8 A ‘‘Market Maker’’ includes Registered Options
Traders (‘‘ROTs’’) (Rule 1014(b)(i) and (ii), which
includes Streaming Quote Traders (‘‘SQTs’’) (See
Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A)) and Remote Streaming Quote
Traders (‘‘RSQTs’’) (See Rule 1014(b)(ii)(B)).
9 The term ‘‘professional’’ means any person or
entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities,
and (ii) places more than 390 orders in listed
options per day on average during a calendar month
for its own beneficial account(s). See Rule
1000(b)(14).
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49041
The Exchange also is proposing to
increase the Complex Order Fees for
Removing Liquidity from $0.36 to $0.39
per contract for Specialists and Market
Makers, and to increase the Complex
Order Fees for Removing Liquidity from
$0.38 to $0.39 per contract for Firms,
Broker-Dealers, and Professionals in
Select Symbols. The Exchange is
proposing to increase these fees in order
that it may offer additional rebates for
Customer Complex Orders as described
below.
Eliminating SPY Discount
The Exchange is proposing to remove
the additional incentive for Customers
who transact Complex Orders in SPY.
The Exchange currently pays a
Customer Complex Order Rebate for
Adding Liquidity of $0.32 per contract
and a Customer Complex Order Rebate
for Removing Liquidity of $0.06 per
contract, but specifies that the Exchange
will increase the Customer Complex
Order Rebates for Adding and Removing
Liquidity by $0.01 per contract for
transactions in SPY. Therefore, with this
change, Customer Complex Orders that
add liquidity in SPY would receive a
rebate of $0.32 per contract and
Customer Complex Orders that remove
liquidity in SPY receive a rebate of
$0.06 per contract. The Exchange is
eliminating the discount in lieu of
offering a higher rebate for Customer
Complex Orders as described below.
Technical Amendments
The Exchange also is proposing to
make technical corrections in Section I,
Parts A and B, by replacing ‘‘$0.00’’
with ‘‘N/A’’ for several categories. This
is not a change to these fees, but a
technical amendment since in these
instances ‘‘N/A’’ better reflects that a fee
is not relevant for this category rather
than ‘‘$0.00’’ which simply reflects that
no fee is currently being charged for this
category.
Section II Amendments
Firm Volume Discount
The Exchange desires to continue to
incentivize Firms to transact electronic
orders, by providing Firms with an
opportunity to pay lower fees in Section
II of the Pricing Schedule by offering a
lower threshold in order for Firms to
receive a reduction of electronic
Options Transaction Charges in Penny
Pilot and non-Penny Pilot Options.
Currently, Firms must have a volume
greater than 750,000 electronically
delivered contracts in a month to obtain
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
49042
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2012 / Notices
the lower fees.10 The Exchange proposes
to lower the threshold volume from
750,000 to 600,000 electronically
delivered contracts in a month. The
Exchange believes that the lower
threshold would enable a greater
number of Firms to take advantage of
lower fees.
Customer Rebate Program
The Exchange recently adopted a
Customer Rebate Program to incentivize
members to transact Customer orders on
the Exchange. Such liquidity benefits all
market participants through increased
liquidity. At this time, the Exchange
proposes to expand its Customer Rebate
Program by adding another Category of
orders eligible for rebates, ‘‘Category D.’’
This new category will pay rebates to
members executing electronically
delivered Customer Complex Orders in
Select Symbols that add liquidity.11 The
Exchange proposes to pay the following
rebates:
Rebate per contract categories
Average daily volume threshold
Category A
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
0 to 49,999 contracts in a month ....................................................................
50,000 to 99,999 contracts in a month ...........................................................
Over 100,000 contracts in a month .................................................................
The Customer Rebate Program
consists of three tiers. The first tier (0 to
49,999 contracts in a month) and the
second tier (50,000 to 99,999 contracts
in a month) do not earn any rebates
defined in Category D. The third tier
(over 100,000 contracts in a month) pays
a rebate as an additional incentive for
member organizations to route Customer
Complex Order flow to the Exchange for
execution ($0.05 per contract). The
$0.05 will be in addition to the
Customer Complex Order Rebate for
Adding Liquidity (currently $0.32 per
contract) for a total rebate of $0.37 for
Category D.
As is currently the case with Category
A, B, and C, each tier or ‘‘Threshold’’ is
calculated by totaling all applicable
Multiply-Listed Options electronically
delivered Customer Orders, except
electronic Qualified Contingent Cross
Orders (eQCC Orders). The Exchange
proposes to amend the calculation of the
Average Daily Volume Threshold by
totaling Customer volume in Multiply
Listed Options that are electronically
delivered and executed, except QCC
Orders as defined in Exchange Rule
1080(o), and including electronically
delivered and executed Customer
Complex Orders in Select Symbols
(‘‘Threshold Volume’’).12 The Exchange
is proposing to add the word
‘‘executed’’ for clarity and account for
the Category D rebates in the Threshold
Volume Calculation. The Exchange
believes that the addition of Category D
will attract additional Customer order
flow to the Exchange for the benefit of
all market participants.
10 Firm electronic Options Transaction Charges in
Penny Pilot and non-Penny Pilot Options will be
reduced to $0.13 per contract for a given month
provided that a Firm has volume greater than
600,000 electronically delivered contracts in a
month (‘‘Electronic Firm Fee Discount’’).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Aug 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
Category B
$0.00
0.07
0.09
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Pricing Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act 13 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 14
in particular, in that it is an equitable
allocation of reasonable fees and other
charges among Exchange members and
other persons using its facilities.
$0.00
0.10
0.12
Category C
$0.00
0.10
0.10
Category D
$0.00
0.00
0.05
Symbols, but would not include the
proposed added symbol.
Complex Order Fees
The Exchange believes its proposal to
increase the Complex Order Rebates for
Adding Liquidity from $0.00 to $0.10
for Specialists,15 Market Makers, Firms,
Broker-Dealers, and Professionals is
reasonable because the Exchange is
proposing to incentivize market
participants to transact additional order
Select Symbols
flow on the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that it is
The Exchange believes that its
reasonable to remove and add the
proposal to increase the Complex Order
proposed symbols from its list of Select
Rebate for Adding Liquidity is equitable
Symbols to attract additional order flow and not unfairly discriminatory because
to the Exchange. The Exchange believes the Exchange is proposing to uniformly
that the fees and rebates in Section I will increase the rebates among market
attract order flow for the newly added
participants, except Customers. Today,
Select Symbol ARNA. Also, the
Customers receive a Complex Order
Exchange believes that applying the fees Rebate for Adding Liquidity of $0.32 per
in Section II of the Pricing Schedule to
contract. Customers would continue to
the Proposed Deleted Symbols,
receive a higher rebate already because
including the opportunity to receive
Customer order flow brings unique
payment for order flow, will attract
benefits to the market which benefits all
order flow to the Exchange.
participants through increased liquidity.
The Exchange believes that it is
The Exchange believes its proposal to
equitable and not unfairly
eliminate Complex Order Fees for
discriminatory to amend its list of Select Adding Liquidity is reasonable because
Symbols to remove and add the
market participants would be
proposed symbols because the list of
incentivized to transact additional
Select Symbols would apply uniformly
orders on the Exchange at no cost when
to all categories of participants in the
adding liquidity. The Exchange believes
same manner. All market participants
its proposal to eliminate Complex Order
who trade the Select Symbols would be
Fees for Adding Liquidity is equitable
subject to the rebates and fees in Section and not unfairly discriminatory because
I of the Pricing Schedule, which would
no market participant would be assessed
not include the proposed deleted
a Complex Order Fee for Adding
symbols, but would include the
Liquidity.
The Exchange believes its proposal to
proposed added symbol. Also, all
market participants would be uniformly increase the Complex Order Fees for
Removing Liquidity from $0.36 to $0.39
subject to the fees in Section II, which
per contract for Specialists and Market
would include the Proposed Deleted
11 This rebate will be in addition to any rebate
that the member receives in Section I of the Pricing
Schedule.
12 Rebates will be paid on Threshold Volume in
a given month, excluding electronically delivered
Customer volume associated with PIXL as is the
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
case today and Customer Complex Orders that
remove liquidity.
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
15 A Specialist is an Exchange member who is
registered as an options specialist pursuant to Rule
1020(a).
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2012 / Notices
Makers, and to increase it from $0.38 to
$0.39 per contract for Firms, BrokerDealers, and Professionals in Select
Symbols is reasonable because the
Exchange is proposing to utilize these
increased fees to fund the proposed new
rebates in the Customer Rebate Program.
The Exchange believes that the
increased Complex Order Fees for
Removing Liquidity are equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because all
market participants, except Customers
will be assessed a uniform fee to remove
liquidity. The Exchange believes that it
is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory to not assess
Customers a Complex Order Fee to
Remove Liquidity because Customer
order flow brings unique benefits to the
market. Also, Customers are not
assessed a Complex Order Fee for
Removing Liquidity, as is the case on
competing exchanges.16
Eliminating SPY Discount
In addition, the Exchange believes
that removing the additional $0.01 per
contract incentive, when transacting
electronically delivered SPY orders, in
addition to the Customer Complex
Order Rebates for Adding and Removing
Liquidity in SPY is reasonable because
the Exchange is proposing to incentivize
members to transact Customer Complex
Orders by offering an incentive in the
Customer Rebate Program. The
Exchange believes that the elimination
of the SPY discount is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because no
market participants would be entitled to
this discount.
Technical Amendments
The Exchange’s proposal to make
technical corrections in Section I, Parts
A and B, by replacing ‘‘$0.00’’ with ‘‘N/
A’’ for several categories is reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because this is not a
change to these fees, but a clarification
that in these instances ‘‘N/A’’ better
reflects that a fee is not relevant for this
category rather than using ‘‘$0.00’’
which simply reflects that no fee is
currently being charged for this
category.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Firm Volume Discount
The Exchange’s amendment to the
volume threshold applicable to the
Electronic Firm Fee Discount in Section
II of the Pricing Schedule is reasonable
because the Exchange believes that the
lower threshold would allow a greater
number of Firms to obtain the lower
16 See
the Chicago Board Options Exchange
Incorporated’s (‘‘CBOE’’) Fees Schedule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Aug 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
pricing when they meet the volume
threshold.
The Exchange’s amendment to the
volume threshold applicable to the
Electronic Firm Fee Discount in Section
II of the Pricing Schedule is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because
it provides all Firms with an
opportunity to pay lower fees through
the lower volume threshold of 600,000
electronically delivered contracts in a
month rather than the current threshold
of 750,000. Today Firms that transact
750,000 electronically delivered
contracts in a month are entitled to
reduce their Firm electronic Options
Transaction Charges in Penny Pilot
($0.40 per contract) and non-Penny Pilot
($0.45 per contract) in a given month to
$0.13 per contract.17 The reduction of
the volume threshold from 750,000
electronically delivered contracts in a
month to 600,000 electronically
delivered contracts in a month would
enable firms to obtain the reduction of
fees by transacting a lower number of
contracts in a month.
Customer Rebate Program
The Exchange’s amendment to the
Customer Rebate Program is reasonable
because it will provide members
another manner in which to earn a
rebate on the Exchange. This rebate will
be in addition to any rebate that the
member receives in Section I of the
Pricing Schedule. The Exchange
believes that offering the Category D
rebate and including Customer Complex
Order volume in Select Symbols in the
Threshold Volume, will attract
additional Customer order flow to the
Exchange and benefit all market
participants. The Exchange believes that
incentivizing members executing
electronically delivered Customer
Complex Orders in Select Symbols to
direct Customer order flow to the
Exchange will benefit all market
participants.
The Exchange’s amendment to the
Customer Rebate Program is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because
all market participants are eligible to
receive the new rebate provided they
meet both the volume and order type
requirement of Category D. Also, the
Exchange believes it is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to base rebates
not only on volume but on the type of
orders because the Exchange would
uniformly apply the rebates to all
market participants by order type. The
Exchange currently offers no rebate
under Category D for the first tier
17 The Electronic Firm Fee Discount applies per
member organization when such members are
trading in their own proprietary account.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49043
(between 0 and 49,999 contracts in a
month) and the second tier (between
50,000 and 99,000 contracts in a
month). It is only in the third tier (over
100,000 contracts in a month) that there
is a rebate and it is $0.05 per contract
to members that execute electronically
delivered Customer Complex Orders in
any Select Symbol that adds liquidity.
Further, the concept of volume tiers and
rebates based on tiers is not novel.
Market participants entitled to Category
A, B, or C rebates are subject to Section
II of the Pricing Schedule, which has no
rebates. Market participants entitled to
Category D rebates are subject to Section
I of the Pricing Schedule and also
receive the Rebate for Adding Liquidity
in Section I.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market, comprised of ten
exchanges, in which market participants
can easily and readily direct order flow
to competing venues if they deem fee
and rebate levels at a particular venue
to be excessive. Accordingly, the fees
that are assessed and the rebates paid by
the Exchange must remain competitive
with fees charged and rebates paid by
other venues and therefore must
continue to be reasonable and equitably
allocated to those members that opt to
direct orders to the Exchange rather
than competing venues.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.18 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
18 15
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
15AUN1
49044
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 15, 2012 / Notices
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2012–104 on the
subject line.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19984 Filed 8–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67632; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2012–64]
type of options product, the comment
letters that have been submitted in
connection with this proposed rule
change, and any response to the
comment letters submitted by the
Exchange.
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,6
designates October 1, 2012 as the date
by which the Commission should either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change
(File No. SR–NYSEArca–2012–64).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
Paper Comments
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a
Longer Period for Commission Action
on Proposed Rule Change To List and
Trade Option Contracts Overlying 10
Shares of a Security
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2012–104. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2012–104 and should be submitted on
or before September 5, 2012.
August 9, 2012.
On June 15, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
list and trade option contracts overlying
10 shares of a security. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on July 3, 2012.3
The Commission received two comment
letters on this proposal.4
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 5 provides
that within 45 days of the publication of
notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day for this filing
is August 17, 2012. The Commission is
extending this 45-day time period.
The Commission finds it appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider this proposed rule change,
which would allow the listing of a new
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Aug 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67283
(June 27, 2012), 77 FR 39535.
4 See letters to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Commission, from Christopher Nagy, President,
KOR Trading LLC, dated July 10, 2012 and Edward
T. Tilly, President and Chief Operating Officer,
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated,
dated July 24, 2012.
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2012–19983 Filed 8–14–12; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67631; File No. SR–ISE–
2012–58]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Designation of a Longer
Period for Commission Action on
Proposed Rule Change To List and
Trade Option Contracts Overlying 10
Shares of a Security
August 9, 2012.
On June 20, 2012, the International
Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to list and trade option contracts
overlying 10 shares of a security. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on July
3, 2012.3 The Commission received one
comment letter on this proposal.4
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 5 provides
that within 45 days of the publication of
notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
6 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67284
(June 27, 2012), 77 FR 39545.
4 See letter to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Commission, from Edward T. Tilly, President and
Chief Operating Officer, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated, dated July 24, 2012.
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
7 17
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49040-49044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19984]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-67633; File No. SR-Phlx-2012-104]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Pricing in Select Symbols and Multiply Listed Options
August 9, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that, on August 1, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Section I of the Exchange's Pricing
Schedule titled ``Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in
Select Symbols,'' to amend various Select Symbols,\3\ increase certain
Complex Order \4\ Rebates for Adding Liquidity, eliminate the Complex
Order
[[Page 49041]]
Fees for Adding Liquidity, increase certain Complex Order Fees for
Removing Liquidity, and eliminate a discount applicable to Customer
Complex Order Rebates, and make technical corrections to ``Part B.
Complex Order'' in Section I. The Exchange also proposes to amend
Section II of the Pricing Schedule titled ``Multiply Listed Options
Fees'' to decrease the threshold amount which entitles members to a
reduced Firm Electronic Options Transaction Charges in Penny Pilot and
non-Penny Pilot Options and amend the Customer Rebate Program.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The rebates and fees in Section I apply to certain Select
Symbols which are listed in Section I of the Pricing Schedule.
\4\ A Complex Order is any order involving the simultaneous
purchase and/or sale of two or more different options series in the
same underlying security, priced at a net debit or credit based on
the relative prices of the individual components, for the same
account, for the purpose of executing a particular investment
strategy. Furthermore, a Complex Order can also be a stock-option
order, which is an order to buy or sell a stated number of units of
an underlying stock or exchange-traded fund (``ETF'') coupled with
the purchase or sale of options contract(s). See Exchange Rule 1080,
Commentary .08(a)(i).
\5\ Section II includes options overlying equities, ETFs, ETNs,
indexes, and HOLDRs which are Multiply Listed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Sections I and
II of the Exchange's Pricing Schedule. Specifically, the Exchange is
proposing to amend Section I of the Pricing Schedule to amend the
Select Symbols, increase certain Complex Order Rebates for Adding
Liquidity, eliminate Complex Order Fees for Adding Liquidity, increase
certain Complex Order Fees for Removing Liquidity, eliminate a discount
applicable to options overlying SPDR S&P 500 (``SPY''),\6\ and to make
other technical amendments. The Exchange is proposing to amend Section
II of the Pricing Schedule to decrease the threshold to receive the
reduced Firm Electronic Options Transaction Charges in Penny Pilot and
non-Penny Pilot Options and to amend the Customer Rebates Program. Each
amendment will be described in more detail below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ SPY is one of the Select Symbols subject to the rebates and
fees in Section I. A complete list of Select Symbols is included in
Section I of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section I Amendments
Select Symbols
The Exchange displays a list of Select Symbols in its Pricing
Schedule at Section I, which symbols are subject to the rebates and
fees in that section. The Exchange is proposing to add the following
symbol to the list of Select Symbols in Section I of the Pricing
Schedule: Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc. (``ARNA''). The Exchange is also
proposing to delete the following symbols from the list of Select
Symbols in Section I of the Pricing Schedule: Dell Inc. (``DELL''), and
Newmont Mining Corp. (``NEM'' (collectively, ``Proposed Deleted
Symbols''). These Proposed Deleted Symbols would be subject to the
rebates and fees in Section II of the Pricing Schedule entitled
``Multiply Listed Options Fees.'' The Exchange believes that by adding
and removing the above-referenced symbols in Section I of the Pricing
Schedule the Exchange will continue to attract order flow to the
Exchange.
Complex Order Fees
The Exchange is proposing to increase the Complex Order Rebates for
Adding Liquidity from $0.00 to $0.10 for Specialists,\7\ Market
Makers,\8\ Firms, Broker-Dealers and Professionals.\9\ Additionally,
the Exchange is proposing to eliminate Complex Order Fees for Adding
Liquidity. The Exchange believes that these fees are no longer
necessary and proposes to uniformly eliminate them for all market
participants. The Exchange believes that the increase to the Complex
Order Rebates for Adding Liquidity coupled with the elimination of the
Complex Order Fees for Adding Liquidity will incentivize market
participants to transact additional Complex Order flow on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ A Specialist is an Exchange member who is registered as an
options specialist pursuant to Rule 1020(a).
\8\ A ``Market Maker'' includes Registered Options Traders
(``ROTs'') (Rule 1014(b)(i) and (ii), which includes Streaming Quote
Traders (``SQTs'') (See Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A)) and Remote Streaming
Quote Traders (``RSQTs'') (See Rule 1014(b)(ii)(B)).
\9\ The term ``professional'' means any person or entity that
(i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more
than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial account(s). See Rule
1000(b)(14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also is proposing to increase the Complex Order Fees
for Removing Liquidity from $0.36 to $0.39 per contract for Specialists
and Market Makers, and to increase the Complex Order Fees for Removing
Liquidity from $0.38 to $0.39 per contract for Firms, Broker-Dealers,
and Professionals in Select Symbols. The Exchange is proposing to
increase these fees in order that it may offer additional rebates for
Customer Complex Orders as described below.
Eliminating SPY Discount
The Exchange is proposing to remove the additional incentive for
Customers who transact Complex Orders in SPY. The Exchange currently
pays a Customer Complex Order Rebate for Adding Liquidity of $0.32 per
contract and a Customer Complex Order Rebate for Removing Liquidity of
$0.06 per contract, but specifies that the Exchange will increase the
Customer Complex Order Rebates for Adding and Removing Liquidity by
$0.01 per contract for transactions in SPY. Therefore, with this
change, Customer Complex Orders that add liquidity in SPY would receive
a rebate of $0.32 per contract and Customer Complex Orders that remove
liquidity in SPY receive a rebate of $0.06 per contract. The Exchange
is eliminating the discount in lieu of offering a higher rebate for
Customer Complex Orders as described below.
Technical Amendments
The Exchange also is proposing to make technical corrections in
Section I, Parts A and B, by replacing ``$0.00'' with ``N/A'' for
several categories. This is not a change to these fees, but a technical
amendment since in these instances ``N/A'' better reflects that a fee
is not relevant for this category rather than ``$0.00'' which simply
reflects that no fee is currently being charged for this category.
Section II Amendments
Firm Volume Discount
The Exchange desires to continue to incentivize Firms to transact
electronic orders, by providing Firms with an opportunity to pay lower
fees in Section II of the Pricing Schedule by offering a lower
threshold in order for Firms to receive a reduction of electronic
Options Transaction Charges in Penny Pilot and non-Penny Pilot Options.
Currently, Firms must have a volume greater than 750,000 electronically
delivered contracts in a month to obtain
[[Page 49042]]
the lower fees.\10\ The Exchange proposes to lower the threshold volume
from 750,000 to 600,000 electronically delivered contracts in a month.
The Exchange believes that the lower threshold would enable a greater
number of Firms to take advantage of lower fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Firm electronic Options Transaction Charges in Penny Pilot
and non-Penny Pilot Options will be reduced to $0.13 per contract
for a given month provided that a Firm has volume greater than
600,000 electronically delivered contracts in a month (``Electronic
Firm Fee Discount'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Rebate Program
The Exchange recently adopted a Customer Rebate Program to
incentivize members to transact Customer orders on the Exchange. Such
liquidity benefits all market participants through increased liquidity.
At this time, the Exchange proposes to expand its Customer Rebate
Program by adding another Category of orders eligible for rebates,
``Category D.'' This new category will pay rebates to members executing
electronically delivered Customer Complex Orders in Select Symbols that
add liquidity.\11\ The Exchange proposes to pay the following rebates:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ This rebate will be in addition to any rebate that the
member receives in Section I of the Pricing Schedule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rebate per contract categories
Average daily volume threshold ---------------------------------------------------------------
Category A Category B Category C Category D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 to 49,999 contracts in a month................ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
50,000 to 99,999 contracts in a month........... 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.00
Over 100,000 contracts in a month............... 0.09 0.12 0.10 0.05
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Customer Rebate Program consists of three tiers. The first tier
(0 to 49,999 contracts in a month) and the second tier (50,000 to
99,999 contracts in a month) do not earn any rebates defined in
Category D. The third tier (over 100,000 contracts in a month) pays a
rebate as an additional incentive for member organizations to route
Customer Complex Order flow to the Exchange for execution ($0.05 per
contract). The $0.05 will be in addition to the Customer Complex Order
Rebate for Adding Liquidity (currently $0.32 per contract) for a total
rebate of $0.37 for Category D.
As is currently the case with Category A, B, and C, each tier or
``Threshold'' is calculated by totaling all applicable Multiply-Listed
Options electronically delivered Customer Orders, except electronic
Qualified Contingent Cross Orders (eQCC Orders). The Exchange proposes
to amend the calculation of the Average Daily Volume Threshold by
totaling Customer volume in Multiply Listed Options that are
electronically delivered and executed, except QCC Orders as defined in
Exchange Rule 1080(o), and including electronically delivered and
executed Customer Complex Orders in Select Symbols (``Threshold
Volume'').\12\ The Exchange is proposing to add the word ``executed''
for clarity and account for the Category D rebates in the Threshold
Volume Calculation. The Exchange believes that the addition of Category
D will attract additional Customer order flow to the Exchange for the
benefit of all market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Rebates will be paid on Threshold Volume in a given month,
excluding electronically delivered Customer volume associated with
PIXL as is the case today and Customer Complex Orders that remove
liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing
Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \13\ in general,
and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \14\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Select Symbols
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to remove and add the
proposed symbols from its list of Select Symbols to attract additional
order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the fees and
rebates in Section I will attract order flow for the newly added Select
Symbol ARNA. Also, the Exchange believes that applying the fees in
Section II of the Pricing Schedule to the Proposed Deleted Symbols,
including the opportunity to receive payment for order flow, will
attract order flow to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to amend its list of Select Symbols to remove and add
the proposed symbols because the list of Select Symbols would apply
uniformly to all categories of participants in the same manner. All
market participants who trade the Select Symbols would be subject to
the rebates and fees in Section I of the Pricing Schedule, which would
not include the proposed deleted symbols, but would include the
proposed added symbol. Also, all market participants would be uniformly
subject to the fees in Section II, which would include the Proposed
Deleted Symbols, but would not include the proposed added symbol.
Complex Order Fees
The Exchange believes its proposal to increase the Complex Order
Rebates for Adding Liquidity from $0.00 to $0.10 for Specialists,\15\
Market Makers, Firms, Broker-Dealers, and Professionals is reasonable
because the Exchange is proposing to incentivize market participants to
transact additional order flow on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ A Specialist is an Exchange member who is registered as an
options specialist pursuant to Rule 1020(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal to increase the Complex
Order Rebate for Adding Liquidity is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange is proposing to uniformly increase
the rebates among market participants, except Customers. Today,
Customers receive a Complex Order Rebate for Adding Liquidity of $0.32
per contract. Customers would continue to receive a higher rebate
already because Customer order flow brings unique benefits to the
market which benefits all participants through increased liquidity.
The Exchange believes its proposal to eliminate Complex Order Fees
for Adding Liquidity is reasonable because market participants would be
incentivized to transact additional orders on the Exchange at no cost
when adding liquidity. The Exchange believes its proposal to eliminate
Complex Order Fees for Adding Liquidity is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because no market participant would be assessed a
Complex Order Fee for Adding Liquidity.
The Exchange believes its proposal to increase the Complex Order
Fees for Removing Liquidity from $0.36 to $0.39 per contract for
Specialists and Market
[[Page 49043]]
Makers, and to increase it from $0.38 to $0.39 per contract for Firms,
Broker-Dealers, and Professionals in Select Symbols is reasonable
because the Exchange is proposing to utilize these increased fees to
fund the proposed new rebates in the Customer Rebate Program. The
Exchange believes that the increased Complex Order Fees for Removing
Liquidity are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because all
market participants, except Customers will be assessed a uniform fee to
remove liquidity. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory to not assess Customers a
Complex Order Fee to Remove Liquidity because Customer order flow
brings unique benefits to the market. Also, Customers are not assessed
a Complex Order Fee for Removing Liquidity, as is the case on competing
exchanges.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See the Chicago Board Options Exchange Incorporated's
(``CBOE'') Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eliminating SPY Discount
In addition, the Exchange believes that removing the additional
$0.01 per contract incentive, when transacting electronically delivered
SPY orders, in addition to the Customer Complex Order Rebates for
Adding and Removing Liquidity in SPY is reasonable because the Exchange
is proposing to incentivize members to transact Customer Complex Orders
by offering an incentive in the Customer Rebate Program. The Exchange
believes that the elimination of the SPY discount is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because no market participants would be
entitled to this discount.
Technical Amendments
The Exchange's proposal to make technical corrections in Section I,
Parts A and B, by replacing ``$0.00'' with ``N/A'' for several
categories is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory
because this is not a change to these fees, but a clarification that in
these instances ``N/A'' better reflects that a fee is not relevant for
this category rather than using ``$0.00'' which simply reflects that no
fee is currently being charged for this category.
Firm Volume Discount
The Exchange's amendment to the volume threshold applicable to the
Electronic Firm Fee Discount in Section II of the Pricing Schedule is
reasonable because the Exchange believes that the lower threshold would
allow a greater number of Firms to obtain the lower pricing when they
meet the volume threshold.
The Exchange's amendment to the volume threshold applicable to the
Electronic Firm Fee Discount in Section II of the Pricing Schedule is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it provides all Firms
with an opportunity to pay lower fees through the lower volume
threshold of 600,000 electronically delivered contracts in a month
rather than the current threshold of 750,000. Today Firms that transact
750,000 electronically delivered contracts in a month are entitled to
reduce their Firm electronic Options Transaction Charges in Penny Pilot
($0.40 per contract) and non-Penny Pilot ($0.45 per contract) in a
given month to $0.13 per contract.\17\ The reduction of the volume
threshold from 750,000 electronically delivered contracts in a month to
600,000 electronically delivered contracts in a month would enable
firms to obtain the reduction of fees by transacting a lower number of
contracts in a month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The Electronic Firm Fee Discount applies per member
organization when such members are trading in their own proprietary
account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Rebate Program
The Exchange's amendment to the Customer Rebate Program is
reasonable because it will provide members another manner in which to
earn a rebate on the Exchange. This rebate will be in addition to any
rebate that the member receives in Section I of the Pricing Schedule.
The Exchange believes that offering the Category D rebate and including
Customer Complex Order volume in Select Symbols in the Threshold
Volume, will attract additional Customer order flow to the Exchange and
benefit all market participants. The Exchange believes that
incentivizing members executing electronically delivered Customer
Complex Orders in Select Symbols to direct Customer order flow to the
Exchange will benefit all market participants.
The Exchange's amendment to the Customer Rebate Program is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because all market
participants are eligible to receive the new rebate provided they meet
both the volume and order type requirement of Category D. Also, the
Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to
base rebates not only on volume but on the type of orders because the
Exchange would uniformly apply the rebates to all market participants
by order type. The Exchange currently offers no rebate under Category D
for the first tier (between 0 and 49,999 contracts in a month) and the
second tier (between 50,000 and 99,000 contracts in a month). It is
only in the third tier (over 100,000 contracts in a month) that there
is a rebate and it is $0.05 per contract to members that execute
electronically delivered Customer Complex Orders in any Select Symbol
that adds liquidity. Further, the concept of volume tiers and rebates
based on tiers is not novel. Market participants entitled to Category
A, B, or C rebates are subject to Section II of the Pricing Schedule,
which has no rebates. Market participants entitled to Category D
rebates are subject to Section I of the Pricing Schedule and also
receive the Rebate for Adding Liquidity in Section I.
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market, comprised of
ten exchanges, in which market participants can easily and readily
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee and rebate
levels at a particular venue to be excessive. Accordingly, the fees
that are assessed and the rebates paid by the Exchange must remain
competitive with fees charged and rebates paid by other venues and
therefore must continue to be reasonable and equitably allocated to
those members that opt to direct orders to the Exchange rather than
competing venues.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\18\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine
[[Page 49044]]
whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2012-104 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-104. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-104 and should be
submitted on or before September 5, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19984 Filed 8-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P