Lemon Juice From Argentina and Mexico, 45653-45656 [2012-18441]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Yakima River Basin Conservation
Advisory Group; Yakima River Basin
Water Enhancement Project, Yakima,
WA
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
As required by the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, the Yakima
River Basin Conservation Advisory
Group, Yakima River Basin Water
Enhancement Project, established by the
Secretary of the Interior, will hold a
public meeting. The Yakima River Basin
Conservation Advisory Group is a
Federal advisory committee that
provides technical advice and counsel
to the Secretary of the Interior and
Washington State on the structure,
implementation, and oversight of the
Yakima River Basin Water Conservation
Program.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, August 21, 2012, from 1 p.m.
to 4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Bureau of Reclamation, Yakima
Field Office, 1917 Marsh Road, Yakima,
Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy McCoy, Manager, Yakima
River Basin Water Enhancement Project,
1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington,
98901; (509) 575–5848, extension 209;
facsimile (509) 454–5612; email at
tmccoy@usbr.gov.
SUMMARY:
The
Yakima River Basin Conservation
Advisory Group (CAG) provides
recommendations to the Secretary and
the State on the structure and
implementation of the basin
conservation program; with that the
group provides recommendations on
rules, regulations, and administration to
facilitate the voluntary sale and lease of
water. The CAG provides oversight to
the Yakima River Basin Conservation
Plan, and provides an annual review of
the implementation of the Water
Conservation Program, including the
applicable water conservation
guidelines of the Secretary used by
participating entities in preparing their
individual water conservation plan.
Agenda: The primary purpose of the
meeting is to update CAG members of
the status of ongoing and future projects
being funded with Yakima River Basin
Water Enhancement Project funds. The
CAG will also review the options of
using the acquired habitat lands to
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Jul 31, 2012
Jkt 226001
mitigate the impacts that occur from the
planned conservation measures and will
develop recommendations at the
completion of their review. This
meeting is open to the public.
Public Disclosure of Comments:
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
45653
Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678–679 and
681–682 (Third Review).
Issued: July 26, 2012.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2012–18697 Filed 7–31–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1105–1106
(Review)]
Lemon Juice From Argentina and
Mexico
Dated: July 17, 2012.
Timothy McCoy,
Program Manager, Pacific Northwest Region.
Institution of five-year reviews concerning
the suspended investigations on lemon juice
from Argentina and Mexico.
[FR Doc. 2012–18743 Filed 7–31–12; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679, 681,
and 682 (Third Review)]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India,
Japan, and Spain; Determination
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil,
India, Japan, and Spain would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.2
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on December 1, 2011 (76 FR
74807) and determined on March 5,
2012 that it would conduct expedited
reviews (77 FR 18861, March 28, 2012).
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on July 26, 2012.
The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4341
(July 2012), entitled Stainless Steel Bar
from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain:
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioners Deanna Tanner Okun and
Daniel R. Pearson voted in the affirmative with
respect to India and Japan and in the negative with
respect to Brazil and Spain.
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted reviews
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether termination of the
suspended investigations on lemon
juice from Argentina and Mexico would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury. Pursuant
to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested
parties are requested to respond to this
notice by submitting the information
specified below to the Commission; 1 to
be assured of consideration, the
deadline for responses is August 31,
2012. Comments on the adequacy of
responses may be filed with the
Commission by October 15, 2012. For
further information concerning the
conduct of these reviews and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207), as most recently amended at 74 FR
2847 (January 16, 2009).
DATES: Effective Date: August 1, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. HearingSUMMARY:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
PO 00000
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 12–5–273,
expiration date June 30, 2014. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20436.
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
45654
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Notices
impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—Effective September 10,
2007, the Department of Commerce
suspended antidumping duty
investigations on imports of lemon juice
from Argentina and Mexico (72 FR
53991 and 53995, September 21, 2007).
The Commission is conducting reviews
to determine whether termination of the
suspended investigations would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably
foreseeable time. It will assess the
adequacy of interested party responses
to this notice of institution to determine
whether to conduct full or expedited
reviews. The Commission’s
determination in any expedited reviews
will be based on the facts available,
which may include information
provided in response to this notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year reviews, as
defined by the Department of
Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these
reviews are Argentina and Mexico.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original
preliminary determinations, the
Commission defined a single Domestic
Like Product consisting of all lemon
juice for further manufacturing,
coextensive with the scope of
investigation.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original preliminary
determinations, the Commission
defined a single Domestic Industry
consisting of all domestic producers of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Jul 31, 2012
Jkt 226001
lemon juice for further manufacture,
corresponding to the subject
merchandise. The Commission found
that the lemon growers did not meet the
criteria for inclusion in the Domestic
Industry pursuant to the statutory
grower/processor provision.
(5) The Order Date is the date that the
investigations were suspended. In these
reviews, the Order Date is September
10, 2007.
(6) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the reviews.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they
may appear in a review even if they
participated personally and
substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation. The
Commission’s designated agency ethics
official has advised that a five-year
review is not considered the ‘‘same
particular matter’’ as the corresponding
underlying original investigation for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post
employment statute for Federal
employees, and Commission rule
201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 73 FR
24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice was
developed in consultation with the
Office of Government Ethics.
Consequently, former employees are not
required to seek Commission approval
to appear in a review under Commission
rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the
corresponding underlying original
investigation was pending when they
were Commission employees. For
further ethics advice on this matter,
contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy
Agency Ethics Official, at 202–205–
3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list.—Pursuant to
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
submitted in these reviews available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the reviews. A
separate service list will be maintained
by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the
APO.
Certification.—Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with these
reviews must certify that the
information is accurate and complete to
the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter
will be deemed to consent, unless
otherwise specified, for the
Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the
information provided in any other
reviews or investigations of the same or
comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of
the Act, or in internal audits and
investigations relating to the programs
and operations of the Commission
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.—Pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules, each interested party response to
this notice must provide the information
specified below. The deadline for filing
such responses is August 31, 2012.
Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as
specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments
concerning the adequacy of responses to
the notice of institution and whether the
Commission should conduct expedited
or full reviews. The deadline for filing
such comments is October 15, 2012. All
written submissions must conform with
the provisions of sections 201.8 and
207.3 of the Commission’s rules and any
submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. Please be aware
that the Commission’s rules with
respect to electronic filing have been
amended. The amendments took effect
on November 7, 2011. See 76 FR 61937
(Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly revised
Commission’s Handbook on E–Filing,
available on the Commission’s Web site
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Also, in
accordance with sections 201.16(c) and
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews
must be served on all other parties to
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Notices
the reviews (as identified by either the
public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service
must accompany the document (if you
are not a party to the reviews you do not
need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested
information.—Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any
interested party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information to be Provided In
Response to this Notice of Institution: If
you are a domestic producer, union/
worker group, or trade/business
association; import/export Subject
Merchandise from more than one
Subject Country; or produce Subject
Merchandise in more than one Subject
Country, you may file a single response.
If you do so, please ensure that your
response to each question includes the
information requested for each pertinent
Subject Country. As used below, the
term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address) and name, telephone number,
fax number, and Email address of the
certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of
the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union
or worker group, a U.S. importer of the
Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer
or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business
association, or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in these reviews by providing
information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the termination of the suspended
investigations on the Domestic Industry
in general and/or your firm/entity
specifically. In your response, please
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Jul 31, 2012
Jkt 226001
discuss the various factors specified in
section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of
subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of
imports of Subject Merchandise on the
Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in each Subject
Country that currently export or have
exported Subject Merchandise to the
United States or other countries since
the Order Date.
(7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in
the U.S. market for the Domestic Like
Product and the Subject Merchandise
(including street address, World Wide
Web address, and the name, telephone
number, fax number, and Email address
of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of
information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or
the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or
other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
operations on that product during
calendar year 2011, except as noted
(report quantity data in 1,000 gallons @
400 GPL and value data in U.S. dollars,
f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker
group or trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms in which your
workers are employed/which are
members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Domestic Like Product (i.e.,
the level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have
expected to attain during the year,
assuming normal operating conditions
(using equipment and machinery in
place and ready to operate), normal
operating levels (hours per week/weeks
per year), time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a
typical or representative product mix);
(c) The quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s);
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45655
(d) The quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(e) The value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost
of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit,
(iv) selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating
income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include
both U.S. and export commercial sales,
internal consumption, and company
transfers) for your most recently
completed fiscal year (identify the date
on which your fiscal year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country(ies), provide
the following information on your
firm’s(s’) operations on that product
during calendar year 2011 (report
quantity data in 1,000 gallons @ 400
GPL and value data in U.S. dollars). If
you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms which are members
of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid) of U.S. imports and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. imports of Subject
Merchandise from each Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port) of U.S. commercial shipments of
Subject Merchandise imported from
each Subject Country; and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port) of U.S. internal consumption/
company transfers of Subject
Merchandise imported from each
Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following
information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2011 (report quantity data
in 1,000 gallons @ 400 GPL and value
data in U.S. dollars, landed and dutypaid at the U.S. port). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in each Subject Country accounted for
by your firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s)
to produce the Subject Merchandise in
each Subject Country (i.e., the level of
production that your establishment(s)
could reasonably have expected to
attain during the year, assuming normal
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
45656
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of Title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission’s rules.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
operating conditions (using equipment
and machinery in place and ready to
operate), normal operating levels (hours
per week/weeks per year), time for
downtime, maintenance, repair, and
cleanup, and a typical or representative
product mix); and
(c) The quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from each Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country(ies) since the Order
Date, and significant changes, if any,
that are likely to occur within a
reasonably foreseeable time. Supply
conditions to consider include
technology; production methods;
development efforts; ability to increase
production (including the shift of
production facilities used for other
products and the use, cost, or
availability of major inputs into
production); and factors related to the
ability to shift supply among different
national markets (including barriers to
importation in foreign markets or
changes in market demand abroad).
Demand conditions to consider include
end uses and applications; the existence
and availability of substitute products;
and the level of competition among the
Domestic Like Product produced in the
United States, Subject Merchandise
produced in the Subject Country(ies),
and such merchandise from other
countries.
(13) (Optional) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 24, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
Decision and Order; Perry T. Dobyns,
M.D.
[FR Doc. 2012–18441 Filed 7–31–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Jul 31, 2012
Jkt 226001
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Pistoia Alliance, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on June
29, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Pistoia Alliance, Inc.
has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Certara L.P. Portugal,
Funchal, Madeira, PORTUGAL; Deloitte
Consulting LLP, New York, NY; Mary
Chitty (individual member), Needham,
MA; and Hewlett-Packard Company,
Palo Alto, CA, have been added as
parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and Pistoia
Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all
changes in membership.
On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance,
Inc. filed its original notification
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The
Department of Justice published a notice
in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009
(74 FR 34364).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on April 17, 2012. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on May 14, 2012 (77 FR 28404).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
denying Respondent’s application, ALJ
at 22, Respondent has been sober since
December 2008, that he has been in
compliance with his Indiana Physicians’
Assistance Program Continuing Care
Contract since November 2009, id. at 20,
and that he ‘‘has consistently taken
responsibility for his misconduct.’’ 1 Id.
at 21. The ALJ thus recommended that
Respondent be granted a restricted
registration subject to multiple
conditions. The Government did not file
exceptions to the ALJ’s decision.2
Having reviewed the record, I have
decided to adopt the ALJ’s findings of
fact, conclusions of law, and
recommended Order. Accordingly, I
will order that Respondent be granted a
registration subject to the following
conditions:
(1) Respondent shall be limited to
prescribing controlled substances and
may not administer or dispense directly
any controlled substances. In addition,
Respondent may not order any
controlled substances or accept any
samples of controlled substances. If
Respondent is employed at a practice in
which controlled substances are stored
on the premises, Respondent shall not
have access to the cabinet in which the
controlled substances are stored.
Respondent shall inform any medical
practice at which he becomes employed
of this restriction on his registration.
(2) Respondent is prohibited from
prescribing controlled substances to
himself or any family member.
(3) Respondent shall maintain a log of
all controlled substance prescriptions he
authorizes and shall file a report listing
in chronological order all such
prescriptions by date, and including the
following information: the name and
address of the patient, name and dosage
of the drug, quantity of the drug, and
number of refills authorized. Each
report shall be filed with the local DEA
field office no later than ten (10)
calendar days after the end of the
previous quarter, e.g., April 10 (for the
quarter ending on March 31), July 10
[FR Doc. 2012–18769 Filed 7–31–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 11–45]
On November 2, 2011, Administrative
Law Judge (ALJ) Gail A. Randall issued
the attached recommended decision.
Therein, the ALJ found that while the
Government had established grounds for
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 No evidence was put forward showing that
Respondent diverted controlled substances to
others.
2 In its post-hearing brief, the Government cites a
prior decision of this Agency, which after having
already ordered that the practitioner’s application
be granted, then noted ‘‘evidence of the
community’s need for a physician of his specialty
with prescribing capabilities.’’ Gov. Br. 11 (quoting
David M. Headley, 61 FR 39469, 39471 (1996)).
However, the Agency has since held in multiple
cases that community impact evidence is not
relevant in the public interest determination and
provided an extensive explanation as to why. See
Linda Sue Cheek, 76 FR 66972, 66973 (2011); Mark
De La Lama, 76 FR 20011, 20020 n.20 (2011);
Bienvenido Tan, 76 FR 17673, 17694 n.58 (2011);
Gregory D. Owens, 74 FR 36571, 36757 & n.22
(2009).
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45653-45656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18441]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1105-1106 (Review)]
Lemon Juice From Argentina and Mexico
Institution of five-year reviews concerning the suspended
investigations on lemon juice from Argentina and Mexico.
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted
reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether termination of the suspended
investigations on lemon juice from Argentina and Mexico would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to
section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to
respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to
the Commission; \1\ to be assured of consideration, the deadline for
responses is August 31, 2012. Comments on the adequacy of responses may
be filed with the Commission by October 15, 2012. For further
information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of
general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part
207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207), as most recently
amended at 74 FR 2847 (January 16, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117-0016/USITC No. 12-5-273,
expiration date June 30, 2014. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send
comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: August 1, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-
[[Page 45654]]
impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record
for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--Effective September 10, 2007, the Department of
Commerce suspended antidumping duty investigations on imports of lemon
juice from Argentina and Mexico (72 FR 53991 and 53995, September 21,
2007). The Commission is conducting reviews to determine whether
termination of the suspended investigations would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry
within a reasonably foreseeable time. It will assess the adequacy of
interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine
whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission's
determination in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts
available, which may include information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions.--The following definitions apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by the Department
of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are Argentina and
Mexico.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original
preliminary determinations, the Commission defined a single Domestic
Like Product consisting of all lemon juice for further manufacturing,
coextensive with the scope of investigation.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In its original preliminary
determinations, the Commission defined a single Domestic Industry
consisting of all domestic producers of lemon juice for further
manufacture, corresponding to the subject merchandise. The Commission
found that the lemon growers did not meet the criteria for inclusion in
the Domestic Industry pursuant to the statutory grower/processor
provision.
(5) The Order Date is the date that the investigations were
suspended. In these reviews, the Order Date is September 10, 2007.
(6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the reviews and public service list.--Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the reviews as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later
than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties
to the reviews.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if
they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation. The Commission's designated agency
ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not considered
the ``same particular matter'' as the corresponding underlying original
investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment
statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR
201.15(b)), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice was developed in
consultation with the Office of Government Ethics. Consequently, former
employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a
review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding
underlying original investigation was pending when they were Commission
employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Carol
McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official, at 202-205-3088.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary
will make BPI submitted in these reviews available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent
interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
the reviews. A separate service list will be maintained by the
Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification.--Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in
connection with these reviews must certify that the information is
accurate and complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter will be deemed to consent,
unless otherwise specified, for the Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the information provided in any other reviews
or investigations of the same or comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of the Act, or in internal audits
and investigations relating to the programs and operations of the
Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.--Pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission's rules, each interested party response to this notice must
provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such
responses is August 31, 2012. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission's rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of
responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission
should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such
comments is October 15, 2012. All written submissions must conform with
the provisions of sections 201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission's rules
and any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the Commission's rules.
Please be aware that the Commission's rules with respect to electronic
filing have been amended. The amendments took effect on November 7,
2011. See 76 FR 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly revised Commission's
Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission's Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov. Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3
of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to the
reviews must be served on all other parties to
[[Page 45655]]
the reviews (as identified by either the public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document
(if you are not a party to the reviews you do not need to serve your
response).
Inability to provide requested information.--Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information to be Provided In Response to this Notice of
Institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/worker group, or
trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more
than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than
one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so,
please ensure that your response to each question includes the
information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used
below, the term ``firm'' includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email
address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S.
producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a
U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or
business association, or another interested party (including an
explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or
which are members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in these reviews by providing information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the termination of the
suspended investigations on the Domestic Industry in general and/or
your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the
various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price
effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject
Merchandise on the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in
each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order
Date.
(7) A list of 3-5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the
Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street
address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax
number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the
U.S. or other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during calendar year 2011, except as noted (report quantity
data in 1,000 gallons @ 400 GPL and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b.
plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which
your workers are employed/which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like
Product (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could
reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready
to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year),
time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or
representative product mix);
(c) The quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
(d) The quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
and
(e) The value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS),
(iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial
sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most
recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal
year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during calendar year 2011 (report quantity
data in 1,000 gallons @ 400 GPL and value data in U.S. dollars). If you
are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an
aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid) of U.S. imports and,
if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of
Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your
firm's(s') imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port) of U.S. commercial
shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country;
and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port) of U.S. internal
consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each
Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country(ies), provide the following information on your
firm's(s') operations on that product during calendar year 2011 (report
quantity data in 1,000 gallons @ 400 GPL and value data in U.S.
dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject
Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject
Merchandise in each Subject Country (i.e., the level of production that
your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during
the year, assuming normal
[[Page 45656]]
operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready
to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year),
time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or
representative product mix); and
(c) The quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country(ies) since the Order Date, and
significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a
reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include
technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to
increase production (including the shift of production facilities used
for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply
among different national markets (including barriers to importation in
foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions
to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and
availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among
the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject Country(ies), and such merchandise
from other countries.
(13) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you
disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why
and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 24, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-18441 Filed 7-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P