Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend EDGX Rule 11.14 To Extend the Operation of the Single Stock Circuit Breaker Pilot Program Until February 4, 2013, 45394-45396 [2012-18602]

Download as PDF 45394 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2012 / Notices communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the Exchange’s principal office and on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–24 and should be submitted on or before August 21, 2012. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.12 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–18655 Filed 7–30–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P [Release No. 34–67502; File No. SR–EDGX– 2012–28] Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend EDGX Rule 11.14 To Extend the Operation of the Single Stock Circuit Breaker Pilot Program Until February 4, 2013 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES July 25, 2012. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on July 18, 2012, the EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:48 Jul 30, 2012 Jkt 226001 II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 12 17 I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend EDGX Rule 11.14 to extend the operation of the single stock circuit breaker pilot program (the ‘‘Pilot’’) pursuant to the Rule until February 4, 2013. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s principal office, on the Commission’s Web site at www.sec.gov, and at the Public Reference Room of the Commission. 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend EDGX Rule 11.14 to extend the operation of a Pilot that allows the Exchange to provide for uniform market-wide trading pause standards for NMS stocks through February 4, 2013. Background Pursuant to Rule 11.14, the Exchange is allowed to pause trading in any NMS stock when the primary listing market for such stock issues a trading pause in such NMS stock. The Exchange will pause trading in such security until trading has resumed on the primary listing market. EDGX Rule 11.14 was approved by the Commission on June 10, 2010 on a Pilot basis to end on December 10, 2010.3 The Pilot was subsequently extended until April 11, 2011.4 The Pilot was then further extended through the earlier of August 11, 2011 or the date on which a limit up/limit down 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62252 (June 10, 2010) (SR–EDGX–2010–01), 75 FR 34186 (June 16, 2010). 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63507 (December 9, 2010) (SR–EDGX–2010–22), 75 FR 78787 (December 16, 2010). PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 mechanism to address extraordinary market volatility, if adopted, applies.5 The Pilot was again extended through January 31, 2012,6 and then extended yet again through July 31, 2012.7 In its initial filing to adopt EDGX Rule 11.14, the Exchange stated that the original Pilot list of securities was all securities included in the S&P 500® Index (‘‘S&P 500’’). The Exchange also noted in that filing that it would continue to assess whether additional securities needed to be added or removed from the Pilot list and whether the parameters of the rule needed to be modified to accommodate trading characteristics of different securities. As noted in comment letters to the initial filing to adopt EDGX Rule 11.14, concerns were raised that including only securities in the S&P 500 in the Pilot rule was too narrow. In particular, commenters noted that securities that experienced volatility on May 6, 2010, including ETFs, should be included in the Pilot. In response to these concerns, various exchanges and national securities associations collectively determined to expand the list of Pilot securities to include securities in the Russell 1000 and specified ETPs to the Pilot beginning in September 2010.8 The Exchange believed that adding these securities would address concerns that the scope of the Pilot may be too narrow, while at the same time recognizing that during the Pilot period, the markets would continue to review whether and when to add additional securities to the Pilot and whether the parameters of the rule should be adjusted for different securities. As a result of consulting with other markets and the staff of the Commission, the Exchange subsequently included all NMS stocks within the Pilot that were not already included therein.9 In particular, the additional stocks were those not included in the S&P 500, Russell 1000 Index, or specified ETPs, and therefore were more likely to be less liquid securities or securities with lower trading volumes. The Exchange stated 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64205 (April 6, 2011) (SR–EDGX–2011–10), 76 FR 20417 (April 12, 2011). 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65092 (August 10, 2011) (SR–EDGX–2011–23), 76 FR 50786 (August 16, 2011). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66228 (January 24, 2012) (SR–EDGX–2012–01), 77 FR 4606 (January 30, 2012). 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62884 (September 10, 2010) (SR–EDGX–2010–05), 75 FR 56618 (September 16, 2010). 9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64375 (June 23, 2011) (SR–EDGX–2011–14), 76 FR 38243 (June 29, 2011). E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2012 / Notices that it would continue to assess whether the parameters for invoking a trading pause continued to be appropriate and whether the parameters should be modified. The Exchange believes that an extension of the Pilot through February 4, 2013 would continue to promote uniformity regarding decisions to pause trading and continue to reduce the negative impacts of sudden, unanticipated price movements in NMS stocks. The Exchange believes that the Pilot is working well, that it has been infrequently invoked during the prior months, and that given the implementation of the Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down Plan’’) on February 4, 2013,10 the Exchange requests an extension of the Pilot through February 4, 2013. At that time, the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan will replace the Pilot.11 2. Statutory Basis The statutory basis for the proposed rule change is Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,12 which requires the rules of an exchange to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The proposed rule change also is designed to support the principles of Section 11A(a)(1) 13 of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule meets these requirements in that it promotes uniformity across markets concerning decisions to pause trading in a security when there are significant price movements. The Exchange believes that the Pilot is working well, that it has been infrequently invoked during the previous months, and that the extension of the Pilot will allow the Exchange to further assess the effect of the Pilot on the market until the implementation of the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan on February 4, 2013. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition that 10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012). 11 Id. 12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 13 15 U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:48 Jul 30, 2012 Jkt 226001 is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested parties. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 14 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.15 Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 16 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.17 A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 18 normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 19 the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as it will allow the pilot program to continue uninterrupted, thereby avoiding the investor confusion that could result from a temporary interruption in the pilot program. For this reason, the U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent to file the proposed rule change along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. 18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 19 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). PO 00000 14 15 15 17 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 45395 Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.20 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an Email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–EDGX–2012–28 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–EDGX–2012–28. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commissions Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will 20 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1 45396 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2012 / Notices be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–EDGX– 2012–28 and should be submitted by August 21, 2012. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.21 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–18602 Filed 7–30–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P [Release No. 34–67501; File No. SR–EDGA– 2012–31] Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend EDGA Rule 11.14 To Extend the Operation of the Single Stock Circuit Breaker Pilot Program Until February 4, 2013 July 25, 2012. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on July 18, 2012, the EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend EDGA Rule 11.14 to extend the operation of the single stock circuit breaker pilot program (the ‘‘Pilot’’) pursuant to the Rule until February 4, 2013. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s principal office, on the Commission’s Web site at www.sec.gov, and at the Public Reference Room of the Commission. CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:48 Jul 30, 2012 Jkt 226001 In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 21 17 II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend EDGA Rule 11.14 to extend the operation of a Pilot that allows the Exchange to provide for uniform market-wide trading pause standards for NMS stocks through February 4, 2013. Background Pursuant to Rule 11.14, the Exchange is allowed to pause trading in any NMS stock when the primary listing market for such stock issues a trading pause in such NMS stock. The Exchange will pause trading in such security until trading has resumed on the primary listing market. EDGA Rule 11.14 was approved by the Commission on June 10, 2010 on a Pilot basis to end on December 10, 2010.3 The Pilot was subsequently extended until April 11, 2011.4 The Pilot was then further extended through the earlier of August 11, 2011 or the date on which a limit up/limit down mechanism to address extraordinary market volatility, if adopted, applies.5 The Pilot was again extended through January 31, 2012,6 and then extended yet again through July 31, 2012.7 In its initial filing to adopt EDGA Rule 11.14, the Exchange stated that the original Pilot list of securities was all 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62252 (June 10, 2010) (SR–EDGA–2010–01), 75 FR 34186 (June 16, 2010). 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63514 (December 9, 2010) (SR–EDGA–2010–23), 75 FR 78783 (December 16, 2010). 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64204 (April 6, 2011) (SR–EDGA–2011–11), 76 FR 20394 (April 12, 2011). 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65091 (August 10, 2011) (SR–EDGA–2011–24), 76 FR 50788 (August 16, 2011). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66227 (January 24, 2012) (SR–EDGA–2012–01), 77 FR 4608 (January 30, 2012). PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 securities included in the S&P 500® Index (‘‘S&P 500’’). The Exchange also noted in that filing that it would continue to assess whether additional securities needed to be added or removed from the Pilot list and whether the parameters of the rule needed to be modified to accommodate trading characteristics of different securities. As noted in comment letters to the initial filing to adopt EDGA Rule 11.14, concerns were raised that including only securities in the S&P 500 in the Pilot rule was too narrow. In particular, commenters noted that securities that experienced volatility on May 6, 2010, including ETFs, should be included in the Pilot. In response to these concerns, various exchanges and national securities associations collectively determined to expand the list of Pilot securities to include securities in the Russell 1000 and specified ETPs to the Pilot beginning in September 2010.8 The Exchange believed that adding these securities would address concerns that the scope of the Pilot may be too narrow, while at the same time recognizing that during the Pilot period, the markets would continue to review whether and when to add additional securities to the Pilot and whether the parameters of the rule should be adjusted for different securities. As a result of consulting with other markets and the staff of the Commission, the Exchange subsequently included all NMS stocks within the Pilot that were not already included therein.9 In particular, the additional stocks were those not included in the S&P 500, Russell 1000 Index, or specified ETPs, and therefore were more likely to be less liquid securities or securities with lower trading volumes. The Exchange stated that it would continue to assess whether the parameters for invoking a trading pause continued to be appropriate and whether the parameters should be modified. The Exchange believes that an extension of the Pilot through February 4, 2013 would continue to promote uniformity regarding decisions to pause trading and continue to reduce the negative impacts of sudden, unanticipated price movements in NMS stocks. The Exchange believes that the Pilot is working well, that it has been infrequently invoked during the prior months, and that given the 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62884 (September 10, 2010) (SR–EDGA–2010–05), 75 FR 56618 (September 16, 2010). 9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64375 (June 23, 2011) (SR–EDGA–2011–15), 76 FR 38243 (June 29, 2011). E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45394-45396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67502; File No. SR-EDGX-2012-28]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend 
EDGX Rule 11.14 To Extend the Operation of the Single Stock Circuit 
Breaker Pilot Program Until February 4, 2013

July 25, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on July 18, 2012, the EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or the 
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and 
II below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend EDGX Rule 11.14 to extend the 
operation of the single stock circuit breaker pilot program (the 
``Pilot'') pursuant to the Rule until February 4, 2013. The text of the 
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at 
www.directedge.com, at the Exchange's principal office, on the 
Commission's Web site at www.sec.gov, and at the Public Reference Room 
of the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, 
set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects 
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend EDGX Rule 11.14 to extend the 
operation of a Pilot that allows the Exchange to provide for uniform 
market-wide trading pause standards for NMS stocks through February 4, 
2013.
Background
    Pursuant to Rule 11.14, the Exchange is allowed to pause trading in 
any NMS stock when the primary listing market for such stock issues a 
trading pause in such NMS stock. The Exchange will pause trading in 
such security until trading has resumed on the primary listing market.
    EDGX Rule 11.14 was approved by the Commission on June 10, 2010 on 
a Pilot basis to end on December 10, 2010.\3\ The Pilot was 
subsequently extended until April 11, 2011.\4\ The Pilot was then 
further extended through the earlier of August 11, 2011 or the date on 
which a limit up/limit down mechanism to address extraordinary market 
volatility, if adopted, applies.\5\ The Pilot was again extended 
through January 31, 2012,\6\ and then extended yet again through July 
31, 2012.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62252 (June 10, 
2010) (SR-EDGX-2010-01), 75 FR 34186 (June 16, 2010).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63507 (December 9, 
2010) (SR-EDGX-2010-22), 75 FR 78787 (December 16, 2010).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64205 (April 6, 
2011) (SR-EDGX-2011-10), 76 FR 20417 (April 12, 2011).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65092 (August 10, 
2011) (SR-EDGX-2011-23), 76 FR 50786 (August 16, 2011).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66228 (January 24, 
2012) (SR-EDGX-2012-01), 77 FR 4606 (January 30, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its initial filing to adopt EDGX Rule 11.14, the Exchange stated 
that the original Pilot list of securities was all securities included 
in the S&P 500[supreg] Index (``S&P 500''). The Exchange also noted in 
that filing that it would continue to assess whether additional 
securities needed to be added or removed from the Pilot list and 
whether the parameters of the rule needed to be modified to accommodate 
trading characteristics of different securities. As noted in comment 
letters to the initial filing to adopt EDGX Rule 11.14, concerns were 
raised that including only securities in the S&P 500 in the Pilot rule 
was too narrow. In particular, commenters noted that securities that 
experienced volatility on May 6, 2010, including ETFs, should be 
included in the Pilot.
    In response to these concerns, various exchanges and national 
securities associations collectively determined to expand the list of 
Pilot securities to include securities in the Russell 1000 and 
specified ETPs to the Pilot beginning in September 2010.\8\ The 
Exchange believed that adding these securities would address concerns 
that the scope of the Pilot may be too narrow, while at the same time 
recognizing that during the Pilot period, the markets would continue to 
review whether and when to add additional securities to the Pilot and 
whether the parameters of the rule should be adjusted for different 
securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62884 (September 10, 
2010) (SR-EDGX-2010-05), 75 FR 56618 (September 16, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result of consulting with other markets and the staff of the 
Commission, the Exchange subsequently included all NMS stocks within 
the Pilot that were not already included therein.\9\ In particular, the 
additional stocks were those not included in the S&P 500, Russell 1000 
Index, or specified ETPs, and therefore were more likely to be less 
liquid securities or securities with lower trading volumes. The 
Exchange stated

[[Page 45395]]

that it would continue to assess whether the parameters for invoking a 
trading pause continued to be appropriate and whether the parameters 
should be modified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64375 (June 23, 
2011) (SR-EDGX-2011-14), 76 FR 38243 (June 29, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that an extension of the Pilot through 
February 4, 2013 would continue to promote uniformity regarding 
decisions to pause trading and continue to reduce the negative impacts 
of sudden, unanticipated price movements in NMS stocks. The Exchange 
believes that the Pilot is working well, that it has been infrequently 
invoked during the prior months, and that given the implementation of 
the Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility Pursuant to Rule 
608 of Regulation NMS under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 
``Limit Up-Limit Down Plan'') on February 4, 2013,\10\ the Exchange 
requests an extension of the Pilot through February 4, 2013. At that 
time, the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan will replace the Pilot.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 
2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012).
    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The statutory basis for the proposed rule change is Section 6(b)(5) 
of the Act,\12\ which requires the rules of an exchange to promote just 
and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect 
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system 
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The 
proposed rule change also is designed to support the principles of 
Section 11A(a)(1) \13\ of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair 
competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. The 
Exchange believes that the proposed rule meets these requirements in 
that it promotes uniformity across markets concerning decisions to 
pause trading in a security when there are significant price movements. 
The Exchange believes that the Pilot is working well, that it has been 
infrequently invoked during the previous months, and that the extension 
of the Pilot will allow the Exchange to further assess the effect of 
the Pilot on the market until the implementation of the Limit Up-Limit 
Down Plan on February 4, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition 
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, 
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received 
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested 
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\15\ 
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the 
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any 
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as 
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) 
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the 
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change along with a 
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least 
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule 
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The 
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \18\ normally 
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. 
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \19\ the Commission may 
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked 
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal 
may become operative immediately upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is 
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as 
it will allow the pilot program to continue uninterrupted, thereby 
avoiding the investor confusion that could result from a temporary 
interruption in the pilot program. For this reason, the Commission 
designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an Email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File No. SR-EDGX-2012-28 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2012-28. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commissions Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml 
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will 
be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the 
Exchange. All comments received will

[[Page 45396]]

be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal 
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2012-28 and should be submitted by 
August 21, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-18602 Filed 7-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.