American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 43145-43146 [2012-17892]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 141 / Monday, July 23, 2012 / Notices 9, 2012. Supporting documentation: Environmental Assessment, dated October 2011. 4. Project name and location: Hercules Intermodal Transit Center, Contra Costa County, CA. Project sponsor: City of Hercules, CA. Project description: The project proposes to construct an intermodal transit center, which would include a new passenger train station on the existing Capitol Corridor line, a transit bus terminal, access roadways, trails, and parking facilities. The transit center would be located on the southeastern shoreline of San Pablo Bay and would be designed to accommodate potential future ferry service. Final agency actions: No use of Section 4(f) resources; a Section 106 finding of no adverse effect; projectlevel air quality conformity; and Record of Decision (ROD), dated June 14, 2012. Supporting documentation: Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report (Final EIS/EIR), dated April 2012. 5. Project name and location: Regional Connector Transit Corridor Project, Los Angeles County, CA. Project sponsor: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Project description: The project will provide a 1.9-mile direct connection of light rail transit (LRT) service from the shared Metro Blue Line and Metro Exposition Line terminus at the 7th Street/Metro Center Station to the Metro Gold Line tracks near 1st and Alameda Streets with three new below grade stations at 2nd/Hope Street, 2nd/ Broadway, and 1st/Central Avenue. Final agency actions: Determination of de minimis impact to one Section 4(f) resource; a Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement; project-level air quality conformity; and Record of Decision (ROD), dated June 29, 2012. Supporting documentation: Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (Final EIS/EIR), dated January 2012. Issued on: July 18, 2012. Lucy Garliauskas, Associate Administrator for Planning and Environment, Washington, DC. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [FR Doc. 2012–17838 Filed 7–20–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:21 Jul 20, 2012 Jkt 226001 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0084; Notice 2] American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice of petition grant. AGENCY: American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (Honda), has determined that certain 2008 and 2009 model year Honda Civic Si model passenger cars when equipped with dealer accessory 18-inch diameter wheels do not fully comply with paragraph S4.2(a) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 138, Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems. Honda filed an appropriate report dated December 3, 2008, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573 Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, Honda has petitioned for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of the petition was published, with a 30-day public comment period, on May 12, 2009 in the Federal Register (74 FR 22202). No comments were received. To view the petition, and supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at: https:// www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search instructions to locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2009–0084.’’ For further information on this decision contact Mr. John Finneran, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202)366–0645, facsimile (202) 366– 5930. Vehicles involved: The exact number of vehicles involved is not known. However, a total of approximately 952 wheels, or 238 complete wheel sets, were sold to Honda dealerships by Honda between July, 2006 and September, 2008. These wheel sets were sold with a replacement tire pressure placard in accordance with FMVSS No. 110, indicating a tire inflation pressure of 250 kPa (36 PSI) for 215/40RZ18 tires having a load capacity rating of 85Y. Noncompliance: Honda explains that the noncompliance occurred because the recommended electronic method of SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 43145 updating the TPMS inflation pressure settings to accommodate proper installation of the subject optional wheel sets incorrectly informed technicians that the adjustments had been completed successfully. The result is that the TPMS inflation pressure warning threshold remains at the standard setting for the original equipment 17-inch wheels of not less than 175 kPa (25 PSI) for the standard recommended tire pressure of 230 kPa (33 PSI). The minimum allowable TPMS threshold for the 18-inch accessory wheels should be 190 kPa (27 PSI), based on the recommended pressure of 250 kPa (36 PSI) as indicated on the replacement tire pressure placard. As a result, the low tire pressure warning telltale required by S4.2(a) will not illuminate at the 27 PSI minimum allowable TPMS threshold necessitated by installation of the dealer accessory wheels and tires. Summary of Honda’s Analysis and Arguments Honda stated that it believes the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety because even at the lower TPMS threshold, adequate load capacity remains for the tires on the subject vehicles. Along with this statement Honda explained that the load capacity for each of the 215/40RZ18 85Y tires is 500 kilograms (1,100 lbs) at 230 kPa (33 PSI), calculated using the Japan Automotive Tyre Manufacturer’s Association (JATMA) method, as recognized by NHTSA in FMVSS No. 110. The maximum allowable load according to the Gross Axle Weight Ratings (GAWR) for a 2008 or 2009 Civic Si is 477 kilograms (1,050 lbs) for each front tire and 425 kilograms (938 lbs) for each rear tire, well within the load capacity specified by JATMA. Honda believes that the described noncompliance of its vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its petition, to exempt from providing recall notification of noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted. NHTSA’s Decision NHTSA’s Analysis: For the agency’s analysis of this petition the requirements of three associated Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) were evaluated. First, as relates to FMVSS No. 110, we agree with Honda’s statement that the 18-inch diameter tires have adequate load carrying capacity for the gross axle weight ratings assigned to any of the subject vehicles equipped with the dealer-installed tires. Two E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM 23JYN1 43146 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 141 / Monday, July 23, 2012 / Notices corresponding requirements exist in FMVSS No. 110 for passenger cars, S4.2.1.1, which states ‘‘[t]he vehicle maximum load on the tire shall not be greater than the applicable maximum load rating as marked on the sidewall of the tire’’ and S4.3.4, requires that ‘‘No inflation pressure other than the maximum permissible inflation pressure may be shown on the placard and, if any, tire inflation pressure label unless—(c) The tire load rating specified in a submission by an individual manufacturer, pursuant to S4.1.1(a) of § 571.139 or contained in one of the publications described in S4.1.1(b) of § 571.139, for the tire size at that inflation pressure is not less than the Front axle Front axle/2 vehicle maximum load and the vehicle normal load on the tire for those vehicle loading conditions. We asked Honda for data for fully loaded vehicles. Honda provided the maximum weight on the front and rear axles with the vehicles loaded to capacity weight, and we calculated the weight per tire assuming an equal distribution between the tires: Rear axle Rear axle/2 Model kg 2-door ............................... 4-door ............................... lb 930 950 2050 2094 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES The 18-inch tires at the maximum load rating on the sidewall of the tires and at the recommended inflation pressures of 33 psi or 36 psi specified on the FMVSS No. 110 vehicle placards appear to meet the two FMVSS No. 110 requirements identified above. We then turned our attention to FMVSS No. 138. FMVSS No. 138 does not require the TPMS telltale activation pressure to be set at a level such that the tires at that pressure will have a load rating appropriate for the vehicle when loaded to its capacity weight.1 The standard requires the TPMS activation pressure to be the value at 25 percent below the manufacturer’s recommended cold inflation pressure or 140kPa (from table 1 in FMVSS No. 138), whichever is higher. For the subject 18-inch tires, as discussed in the previous paragraph under the requirements of FMVSS No. 110, Honda could have specified a recommended cold inflation pressure of 33 psi or the 36 psi and either pressure would have been appropriate for the vehicles maximum load on the tires. Twenty-five percent below either of these recommended inflation pressures would have been appropriate under the requirements of FMVSS No. 138. Finally, as relates to FMVSS No. 139, we examined the low inflation pressure performance test required by that standard. FMVSS No. 139 specifies a low inflation pressure performance test in which the tire is loaded to its maximum tire load capacity and inflated to only 140kPa (20 psi), less than the TPMS telltale activation pressure for the subject vehicles. Although NHTSA did not test a sample of the 18-inch tire to FMVSS No. 139, 1 See Federal Register Notice 70 FR 18138, 18146 (April 8, 2005) describing NHTSA’s testing of a variety of Standard Load P-metric tires at 20 psi with 100 percent load, and no tires failed. ‘‘This testing led the agency to conclude that warnings of less severe conditions [i.e., in Honda’s case 25 psi] will give drivers sufficient time to check and reinflate their vehicles’ tires before the tires experience appreciable damage.’’ VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:21 Jul 20, 2012 Jkt 226001 kg lb 465 475 kg 1025 1047 tire manufacturers are required to certify that the tires meet all applicable requirements of the standard, evidenced by labeling each tire with the letters ‘‘DOT.’’ NHTSA’s Conclusion: Honda is asking the agency to determine that its noncompliance be deemed inconsequential to safety because it believes the 18-inch tires have adequate load capacity at the 36 psi recommended inflation pressure for these tires and at the lower 33 psi recommended inflation pressure for the 17-inch tire being replaced. NHTSA’s analysis determined that Honda was correct in its assessment. Furthermore, FMVSS No. 138 does not include a minimum tire load rating margin requirement at the TPMS activation pressure thus a 25 percent below either pressure would be appropriate under the standard’s requirements. NHTSA’s analysis also noted that the subject tires must be certified to the low inflation pressure performance testing of FMVSS No. 139 which is conducted at an inflation pressure further below the subject tires TPMS activation inflation pressures. Finally, we conducted a search of the agency’s Office of Defects Investigation’s complaint data base and found no complaints associated directly with the incorrect TPMS activation inflation pressure thresholds for the 2008 and 2009 Honda Civic vehicles. NHTSA’s Decision: In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has determined that Honda has adequately demonstrated, under the specific facts and circumstances presented here, that the noncompliance with FMVSS No. 138 in the case of 2008 and 2009 2-door and 4-door Civic SI vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, Honda’s petition is granted and the petitioner is exempted from the obligation of providing notification of, and a remedy for, that noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120. PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 lb 805 830 kg 1774 1830 lb 402 415 887 915 Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and 501.8). Issued on: July 17, 2012. Claude H. Harris, Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. [FR Doc. 2012–17892 Filed 7–20–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [Docket No. FD 35642] Twin Cities & Western Railroad Company, the Estate of Douglas M. Head, and the DMH Trust fbo Martha M. Head—Continuance in Control Exemption—Sisseton Milbank Railroad Company AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT. ACTION: Notice of exemption. The Board is granting an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323–25 for Twin Cities & Western Railroad Company (TCW), a Class III rail carrier, and the Estate of Douglas M. Head (the Estate), a noncarrier, to continue in control of Sisseton Milbank Railroad Company (SMRC) upon SMRC’s becoming a Class III rail carrier in a related transaction. That related transaction involves SMRC’s acquisition from Sisseton Milbank Railroad, Inc. (SMRR) and SLA Property Management Limited Partnership (SLA) of their interests in, and operation of, approximately 37.1 miles of rail line situated in Grant and Roberts Counties, S.D. (the Line).1 Because all the carriers involved are Class III carriers, the continuance-incontrol exemption is not subject to labor SUMMARY: 1 See Sisseton Milbank R.R.—Acquis. & Operation Exemption—SLA Prop. Mgmt. Ltd. P’ship, FD 35641 (STB served June 29, 2012). E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM 23JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43145-43146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0084; Notice 2]


American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Grant of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition grant.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (Honda), has determined that 
certain 2008 and 2009 model year Honda Civic Si model passenger cars 
when equipped with dealer accessory 18-inch diameter wheels do not 
fully comply with paragraph S4.2(a) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 
Standard (FMVSS) No. 138, Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems. Honda filed 
an appropriate report dated December 3, 2008, pursuant to 49 CFR part 
573 Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule 
implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, Honda has petitioned 
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is 
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of the 
petition was published, with a 30-day public comment period, on May 12, 
2009 in the Federal Register (74 FR 22202). No comments were received. 
To view the petition, and supporting documents log onto the Federal 
Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search instructions to 
locate docket number ``NHTSA-2009-0084.''
    For further information on this decision contact Mr. John Finneran, 
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway Traffic 
Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202)366-0645, facsimile (202) 
366-5930.
    Vehicles involved: The exact number of vehicles involved is not 
known. However, a total of approximately 952 wheels, or 238 complete 
wheel sets, were sold to Honda dealerships by Honda between July, 2006 
and September, 2008. These wheel sets were sold with a replacement tire 
pressure placard in accordance with FMVSS No. 110, indicating a tire 
inflation pressure of 250 kPa (36 PSI) for 215/40RZ18 tires having a 
load capacity rating of 85Y.
    Noncompliance: Honda explains that the noncompliance occurred 
because the recommended electronic method of updating the TPMS 
inflation pressure settings to accommodate proper installation of the 
subject optional wheel sets incorrectly informed technicians that the 
adjustments had been completed successfully. The result is that the 
TPMS inflation pressure warning threshold remains at the standard 
setting for the original equipment 17-inch wheels of not less than 175 
kPa (25 PSI) for the standard recommended tire pressure of 230 kPa (33 
PSI). The minimum allowable TPMS threshold for the 18-inch accessory 
wheels should be 190 kPa (27 PSI), based on the recommended pressure of 
250 kPa (36 PSI) as indicated on the replacement tire pressure placard. 
As a result, the low tire pressure warning telltale required by S4.2(a) 
will not illuminate at the 27 PSI minimum allowable TPMS threshold 
necessitated by installation of the dealer accessory wheels and tires.

Summary of Honda's Analysis and Arguments

    Honda stated that it believes the noncompliance is inconsequential 
to motor vehicle safety because even at the lower TPMS threshold, 
adequate load capacity remains for the tires on the subject vehicles. 
Along with this statement Honda explained that the load capacity for 
each of the 215/40RZ18 85Y tires is 500 kilograms (1,100 lbs) at 230 
kPa (33 PSI), calculated using the Japan Automotive Tyre Manufacturer's 
Association (JATMA) method, as recognized by NHTSA in FMVSS No. 110. 
The maximum allowable load according to the Gross Axle Weight Ratings 
(GAWR) for a 2008 or 2009 Civic Si is 477 kilograms (1,050 lbs) for 
each front tire and 425 kilograms (938 lbs) for each rear tire, well 
within the load capacity specified by JATMA.
    Honda believes that the described noncompliance of its vehicles is 
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its petition, to 
exempt from providing recall notification of noncompliance as required 
by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall noncompliance as required 
by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.

NHTSA's Decision

    NHTSA's Analysis: For the agency's analysis of this petition the 
requirements of three associated Federal motor vehicle safety standards 
(FMVSS) were evaluated. First, as relates to FMVSS No. 110, we agree 
with Honda's statement that the 18-inch diameter tires have adequate 
load carrying capacity for the gross axle weight ratings assigned to 
any of the subject vehicles equipped with the dealer-installed tires. 
Two

[[Page 43146]]

corresponding requirements exist in FMVSS No. 110 for passenger cars, 
S4.2.1.1, which states ``[t]he vehicle maximum load on the tire shall 
not be greater than the applicable maximum load rating as marked on the 
sidewall of the tire'' and S4.3.4, requires that ``No inflation 
pressure other than the maximum permissible inflation pressure may be 
shown on the placard and, if any, tire inflation pressure label 
unless--(c) The tire load rating specified in a submission by an 
individual manufacturer, pursuant to S4.1.1(a) of Sec.  571.139 or 
contained in one of the publications described in S4.1.1(b) of Sec.  
571.139, for the tire size at that inflation pressure is not less than 
the vehicle maximum load and the vehicle normal load on the tire for 
those vehicle loading conditions. We asked Honda for data for fully 
loaded vehicles. Honda provided the maximum weight on the front and 
rear axles with the vehicles loaded to capacity weight, and we 
calculated the weight per tire assuming an equal distribution between 
the tires:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Front axle               Front axle/2                Rear axle                Rear axle/2
                      Model                      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       kg           lb           kg           lb           kg           lb           kg           lb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-door..........................................          930         2050          465         1025          805         1774          402          887
4-door..........................................          950         2094          475         1047          830         1830          415          915
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The 18-inch tires at the maximum load rating on the sidewall of the 
tires and at the recommended inflation pressures of 33 psi or 36 psi 
specified on the FMVSS No. 110 vehicle placards appear to meet the two 
FMVSS No. 110 requirements identified above.
    We then turned our attention to FMVSS No. 138. FMVSS No. 138 does 
not require the TPMS telltale activation pressure to be set at a level 
such that the tires at that pressure will have a load rating 
appropriate for the vehicle when loaded to its capacity weight.\1\ The 
standard requires the TPMS activation pressure to be the value at 25 
percent below the manufacturer's recommended cold inflation pressure or 
140kPa (from table 1 in FMVSS No. 138), whichever is higher. For the 
subject 18-inch tires, as discussed in the previous paragraph under the 
requirements of FMVSS No. 110, Honda could have specified a recommended 
cold inflation pressure of 33 psi or the 36 psi and either pressure 
would have been appropriate for the vehicles maximum load on the tires. 
Twenty-five percent below either of these recommended inflation 
pressures would have been appropriate under the requirements of FMVSS 
No. 138.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Federal Register Notice 70 FR 18138, 18146 (April 8, 
2005) describing NHTSA's testing of a variety of Standard Load P-
metric tires at 20 psi with 100 percent load, and no tires failed. 
``This testing led the agency to conclude that warnings of less 
severe conditions [i.e., in Honda's case 25 psi] will give drivers 
sufficient time to check and re-inflate their vehicles' tires before 
the tires experience appreciable damage.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, as relates to FMVSS No. 139, we examined the low inflation 
pressure performance test required by that standard. FMVSS No. 139 
specifies a low inflation pressure performance test in which the tire 
is loaded to its maximum tire load capacity and inflated to only 140kPa 
(20 psi), less than the TPMS telltale activation pressure for the 
subject vehicles. Although NHTSA did not test a sample of the 18-inch 
tire to FMVSS No. 139, tire manufacturers are required to certify that 
the tires meet all applicable requirements of the standard, evidenced 
by labeling each tire with the letters ``DOT.''
    NHTSA's Conclusion: Honda is asking the agency to determine that 
its noncompliance be deemed inconsequential to safety because it 
believes the 18-inch tires have adequate load capacity at the 36 psi 
recommended inflation pressure for these tires and at the lower 33 psi 
recommended inflation pressure for the 17-inch tire being replaced. 
NHTSA's analysis determined that Honda was correct in its assessment. 
Furthermore, FMVSS No. 138 does not include a minimum tire load rating 
margin requirement at the TPMS activation pressure thus a 25 percent 
below either pressure would be appropriate under the standard's 
requirements. NHTSA's analysis also noted that the subject tires must 
be certified to the low inflation pressure performance testing of FMVSS 
No. 139 which is conducted at an inflation pressure further below the 
subject tires TPMS activation inflation pressures. Finally, we 
conducted a search of the agency's Office of Defects Investigation's 
complaint data base and found no complaints associated directly with 
the incorrect TPMS activation inflation pressure thresholds for the 
2008 and 2009 Honda Civic vehicles.
    NHTSA's Decision: In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has 
determined that Honda has adequately demonstrated, under the specific 
facts and circumstances presented here, that the noncompliance with 
FMVSS No. 138 in the case of 2008 and 2009 2-door and 4-door Civic SI 
vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, 
Honda's petition is granted and the petitioner is exempted from the 
obligation of providing notification of, and a remedy for, that 
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.

    Authority:  (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at 
CFR 1.50 and 501.8).

    Issued on: July 17, 2012.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012-17892 Filed 7-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.