American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 43145-43146 [2012-17892]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 141 / Monday, July 23, 2012 / Notices
9, 2012. Supporting documentation:
Environmental Assessment, dated
October 2011.
4. Project name and location:
Hercules Intermodal Transit Center,
Contra Costa County, CA. Project
sponsor: City of Hercules, CA. Project
description: The project proposes to
construct an intermodal transit center,
which would include a new passenger
train station on the existing Capitol
Corridor line, a transit bus terminal,
access roadways, trails, and parking
facilities. The transit center would be
located on the southeastern shoreline of
San Pablo Bay and would be designed
to accommodate potential future ferry
service. Final agency actions: No use of
Section 4(f) resources; a Section 106
finding of no adverse effect; projectlevel air quality conformity; and Record
of Decision (ROD), dated June 14, 2012.
Supporting documentation: Final
Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report (Final
EIS/EIR), dated April 2012.
5. Project name and location:
Regional Connector Transit Corridor
Project, Los Angeles County, CA. Project
sponsor: Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(LACMTA). Project description: The
project will provide a 1.9-mile direct
connection of light rail transit (LRT)
service from the shared Metro Blue Line
and Metro Exposition Line terminus at
the 7th Street/Metro Center Station to
the Metro Gold Line tracks near 1st and
Alameda Streets with three new below
grade stations at 2nd/Hope Street, 2nd/
Broadway, and 1st/Central Avenue.
Final agency actions: Determination of
de minimis impact to one Section 4(f)
resource; a Section 106 Memorandum of
Agreement; project-level air quality
conformity; and Record of Decision
(ROD), dated June 29, 2012. Supporting
documentation: Final Environmental
Impact Statement/Environmental
Impact Report (Final EIS/EIR), dated
January 2012.
Issued on: July 18, 2012.
Lucy Garliauskas,
Associate Administrator for Planning and
Environment, Washington, DC.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2012–17838 Filed 7–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 Jul 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0084; Notice 2]
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Grant
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of petition grant.
AGENCY:
American Honda Motor Co.,
Inc. (Honda), has determined that
certain 2008 and 2009 model year
Honda Civic Si model passenger cars
when equipped with dealer accessory
18-inch diameter wheels do not fully
comply with paragraph S4.2(a) of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 138, Tire Pressure
Monitoring Systems. Honda filed an
appropriate report dated December 3,
2008, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and the rule implementing
those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556,
Honda has petitioned for an exemption
from the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301
on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was
published, with a 30-day public
comment period, on May 12, 2009 in the
Federal Register (74 FR 22202). No
comments were received. To view the
petition, and supporting documents log
onto the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the
online search instructions to locate
docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2009–0084.’’
For further information on this
decision contact Mr. John Finneran,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202)366–0645, facsimile (202) 366–
5930.
Vehicles involved: The exact number
of vehicles involved is not known.
However, a total of approximately 952
wheels, or 238 complete wheel sets,
were sold to Honda dealerships by
Honda between July, 2006 and
September, 2008. These wheel sets were
sold with a replacement tire pressure
placard in accordance with FMVSS No.
110, indicating a tire inflation pressure
of 250 kPa (36 PSI) for 215/40RZ18 tires
having a load capacity rating of 85Y.
Noncompliance: Honda explains that
the noncompliance occurred because
the recommended electronic method of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43145
updating the TPMS inflation pressure
settings to accommodate proper
installation of the subject optional
wheel sets incorrectly informed
technicians that the adjustments had
been completed successfully. The result
is that the TPMS inflation pressure
warning threshold remains at the
standard setting for the original
equipment 17-inch wheels of not less
than 175 kPa (25 PSI) for the standard
recommended tire pressure of 230 kPa
(33 PSI). The minimum allowable TPMS
threshold for the 18-inch accessory
wheels should be 190 kPa (27 PSI),
based on the recommended pressure of
250 kPa (36 PSI) as indicated on the
replacement tire pressure placard. As a
result, the low tire pressure warning
telltale required by S4.2(a) will not
illuminate at the 27 PSI minimum
allowable TPMS threshold necessitated
by installation of the dealer accessory
wheels and tires.
Summary of Honda’s Analysis and
Arguments
Honda stated that it believes the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety because even at the
lower TPMS threshold, adequate load
capacity remains for the tires on the
subject vehicles. Along with this
statement Honda explained that the load
capacity for each of the 215/40RZ18 85Y
tires is 500 kilograms (1,100 lbs) at 230
kPa (33 PSI), calculated using the Japan
Automotive Tyre Manufacturer’s
Association (JATMA) method, as
recognized by NHTSA in FMVSS No.
110. The maximum allowable load
according to the Gross Axle Weight
Ratings (GAWR) for a 2008 or 2009
Civic Si is 477 kilograms (1,050 lbs) for
each front tire and 425 kilograms (938
lbs) for each rear tire, well within the
load capacity specified by JATMA.
Honda believes that the described
noncompliance of its vehicles is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition, to exempt from
providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30120 should be granted.
NHTSA’s Decision
NHTSA’s Analysis: For the agency’s
analysis of this petition the
requirements of three associated Federal
motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS)
were evaluated. First, as relates to
FMVSS No. 110, we agree with Honda’s
statement that the 18-inch diameter tires
have adequate load carrying capacity for
the gross axle weight ratings assigned to
any of the subject vehicles equipped
with the dealer-installed tires. Two
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
43146
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 141 / Monday, July 23, 2012 / Notices
corresponding requirements exist in
FMVSS No. 110 for passenger cars,
S4.2.1.1, which states ‘‘[t]he vehicle
maximum load on the tire shall not be
greater than the applicable maximum
load rating as marked on the sidewall of
the tire’’ and S4.3.4, requires that ‘‘No
inflation pressure other than the
maximum permissible inflation pressure
may be shown on the placard and, if
any, tire inflation pressure label
unless—(c) The tire load rating specified
in a submission by an individual
manufacturer, pursuant to S4.1.1(a) of
§ 571.139 or contained in one of the
publications described in S4.1.1(b) of
§ 571.139, for the tire size at that
inflation pressure is not less than the
Front axle
Front axle/2
vehicle maximum load and the vehicle
normal load on the tire for those vehicle
loading conditions. We asked Honda for
data for fully loaded vehicles. Honda
provided the maximum weight on the
front and rear axles with the vehicles
loaded to capacity weight, and we
calculated the weight per tire assuming
an equal distribution between the tires:
Rear axle
Rear axle/2
Model
kg
2-door ...............................
4-door ...............................
lb
930
950
2050
2094
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The 18-inch tires at the maximum
load rating on the sidewall of the tires
and at the recommended inflation
pressures of 33 psi or 36 psi specified
on the FMVSS No. 110 vehicle placards
appear to meet the two FMVSS No. 110
requirements identified above.
We then turned our attention to
FMVSS No. 138. FMVSS No. 138 does
not require the TPMS telltale activation
pressure to be set at a level such that the
tires at that pressure will have a load
rating appropriate for the vehicle when
loaded to its capacity weight.1 The
standard requires the TPMS activation
pressure to be the value at 25 percent
below the manufacturer’s recommended
cold inflation pressure or 140kPa (from
table 1 in FMVSS No. 138), whichever
is higher. For the subject 18-inch tires,
as discussed in the previous paragraph
under the requirements of FMVSS No.
110, Honda could have specified a
recommended cold inflation pressure of
33 psi or the 36 psi and either pressure
would have been appropriate for the
vehicles maximum load on the tires.
Twenty-five percent below either of
these recommended inflation pressures
would have been appropriate under the
requirements of FMVSS No. 138.
Finally, as relates to FMVSS No. 139,
we examined the low inflation pressure
performance test required by that
standard. FMVSS No. 139 specifies a
low inflation pressure performance test
in which the tire is loaded to its
maximum tire load capacity and
inflated to only 140kPa (20 psi), less
than the TPMS telltale activation
pressure for the subject vehicles.
Although NHTSA did not test a sample
of the 18-inch tire to FMVSS No. 139,
1 See Federal Register Notice 70 FR 18138, 18146
(April 8, 2005) describing NHTSA’s testing of a
variety of Standard Load P-metric tires at 20 psi
with 100 percent load, and no tires failed. ‘‘This
testing led the agency to conclude that warnings of
less severe conditions [i.e., in Honda’s case 25 psi]
will give drivers sufficient time to check and reinflate their vehicles’ tires before the tires
experience appreciable damage.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 Jul 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
kg
lb
465
475
kg
1025
1047
tire manufacturers are required to certify
that the tires meet all applicable
requirements of the standard, evidenced
by labeling each tire with the letters
‘‘DOT.’’
NHTSA’s Conclusion: Honda is asking
the agency to determine that its
noncompliance be deemed
inconsequential to safety because it
believes the 18-inch tires have adequate
load capacity at the 36 psi
recommended inflation pressure for
these tires and at the lower 33 psi
recommended inflation pressure for the
17-inch tire being replaced. NHTSA’s
analysis determined that Honda was
correct in its assessment. Furthermore,
FMVSS No. 138 does not include a
minimum tire load rating margin
requirement at the TPMS activation
pressure thus a 25 percent below either
pressure would be appropriate under
the standard’s requirements. NHTSA’s
analysis also noted that the subject tires
must be certified to the low inflation
pressure performance testing of FMVSS
No. 139 which is conducted at an
inflation pressure further below the
subject tires TPMS activation inflation
pressures. Finally, we conducted a
search of the agency’s Office of Defects
Investigation’s complaint data base and
found no complaints associated directly
with the incorrect TPMS activation
inflation pressure thresholds for the
2008 and 2009 Honda Civic vehicles.
NHTSA’s Decision: In consideration
of the foregoing, NHTSA has
determined that Honda has adequately
demonstrated, under the specific facts
and circumstances presented here, that
the noncompliance with FMVSS No.
138 in the case of 2008 and 2009 2-door
and 4-door Civic SI vehicles is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, Honda’s petition is granted
and the petitioner is exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of,
and a remedy for, that noncompliance
under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
lb
805
830
kg
1774
1830
lb
402
415
887
915
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8).
Issued on: July 17, 2012.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012–17892 Filed 7–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35642]
Twin Cities & Western Railroad
Company, the Estate of Douglas M.
Head, and the DMH Trust fbo Martha M.
Head—Continuance in Control
Exemption—Sisseton Milbank Railroad
Company
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
ACTION:
Notice of exemption.
The Board is granting an
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from
the prior approval requirements of
49 U.S.C. 11323–25 for Twin Cities &
Western Railroad Company (TCW), a
Class III rail carrier, and the Estate of
Douglas M. Head (the Estate), a
noncarrier, to continue in control of
Sisseton Milbank Railroad Company
(SMRC) upon SMRC’s becoming a Class
III rail carrier in a related transaction.
That related transaction involves
SMRC’s acquisition from Sisseton
Milbank Railroad, Inc. (SMRR) and SLA
Property Management Limited
Partnership (SLA) of their interests in,
and operation of, approximately 37.1
miles of rail line situated in Grant and
Roberts Counties, S.D. (the Line).1
Because all the carriers involved are
Class III carriers, the continuance-incontrol exemption is not subject to labor
SUMMARY:
1 See Sisseton Milbank R.R.—Acquis. & Operation
Exemption—SLA Prop. Mgmt. Ltd. P’ship, FD 35641
(STB served June 29, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43145-43146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17892]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0084; Notice 2]
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of petition grant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (Honda), has determined that
certain 2008 and 2009 model year Honda Civic Si model passenger cars
when equipped with dealer accessory 18-inch diameter wheels do not
fully comply with paragraph S4.2(a) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 138, Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems. Honda filed
an appropriate report dated December 3, 2008, pursuant to 49 CFR part
573 Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule
implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, Honda has petitioned
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of the
petition was published, with a 30-day public comment period, on May 12,
2009 in the Federal Register (74 FR 22202). No comments were received.
To view the petition, and supporting documents log onto the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ``NHTSA-2009-0084.''
For further information on this decision contact Mr. John Finneran,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202)366-0645, facsimile (202)
366-5930.
Vehicles involved: The exact number of vehicles involved is not
known. However, a total of approximately 952 wheels, or 238 complete
wheel sets, were sold to Honda dealerships by Honda between July, 2006
and September, 2008. These wheel sets were sold with a replacement tire
pressure placard in accordance with FMVSS No. 110, indicating a tire
inflation pressure of 250 kPa (36 PSI) for 215/40RZ18 tires having a
load capacity rating of 85Y.
Noncompliance: Honda explains that the noncompliance occurred
because the recommended electronic method of updating the TPMS
inflation pressure settings to accommodate proper installation of the
subject optional wheel sets incorrectly informed technicians that the
adjustments had been completed successfully. The result is that the
TPMS inflation pressure warning threshold remains at the standard
setting for the original equipment 17-inch wheels of not less than 175
kPa (25 PSI) for the standard recommended tire pressure of 230 kPa (33
PSI). The minimum allowable TPMS threshold for the 18-inch accessory
wheels should be 190 kPa (27 PSI), based on the recommended pressure of
250 kPa (36 PSI) as indicated on the replacement tire pressure placard.
As a result, the low tire pressure warning telltale required by S4.2(a)
will not illuminate at the 27 PSI minimum allowable TPMS threshold
necessitated by installation of the dealer accessory wheels and tires.
Summary of Honda's Analysis and Arguments
Honda stated that it believes the noncompliance is inconsequential
to motor vehicle safety because even at the lower TPMS threshold,
adequate load capacity remains for the tires on the subject vehicles.
Along with this statement Honda explained that the load capacity for
each of the 215/40RZ18 85Y tires is 500 kilograms (1,100 lbs) at 230
kPa (33 PSI), calculated using the Japan Automotive Tyre Manufacturer's
Association (JATMA) method, as recognized by NHTSA in FMVSS No. 110.
The maximum allowable load according to the Gross Axle Weight Ratings
(GAWR) for a 2008 or 2009 Civic Si is 477 kilograms (1,050 lbs) for
each front tire and 425 kilograms (938 lbs) for each rear tire, well
within the load capacity specified by JATMA.
Honda believes that the described noncompliance of its vehicles is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its petition, to
exempt from providing recall notification of noncompliance as required
by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall noncompliance as required
by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
NHTSA's Decision
NHTSA's Analysis: For the agency's analysis of this petition the
requirements of three associated Federal motor vehicle safety standards
(FMVSS) were evaluated. First, as relates to FMVSS No. 110, we agree
with Honda's statement that the 18-inch diameter tires have adequate
load carrying capacity for the gross axle weight ratings assigned to
any of the subject vehicles equipped with the dealer-installed tires.
Two
[[Page 43146]]
corresponding requirements exist in FMVSS No. 110 for passenger cars,
S4.2.1.1, which states ``[t]he vehicle maximum load on the tire shall
not be greater than the applicable maximum load rating as marked on the
sidewall of the tire'' and S4.3.4, requires that ``No inflation
pressure other than the maximum permissible inflation pressure may be
shown on the placard and, if any, tire inflation pressure label
unless--(c) The tire load rating specified in a submission by an
individual manufacturer, pursuant to S4.1.1(a) of Sec. 571.139 or
contained in one of the publications described in S4.1.1(b) of Sec.
571.139, for the tire size at that inflation pressure is not less than
the vehicle maximum load and the vehicle normal load on the tire for
those vehicle loading conditions. We asked Honda for data for fully
loaded vehicles. Honda provided the maximum weight on the front and
rear axles with the vehicles loaded to capacity weight, and we
calculated the weight per tire assuming an equal distribution between
the tires:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Front axle Front axle/2 Rear axle Rear axle/2
Model -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
kg lb kg lb kg lb kg lb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-door.......................................... 930 2050 465 1025 805 1774 402 887
4-door.......................................... 950 2094 475 1047 830 1830 415 915
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 18-inch tires at the maximum load rating on the sidewall of the
tires and at the recommended inflation pressures of 33 psi or 36 psi
specified on the FMVSS No. 110 vehicle placards appear to meet the two
FMVSS No. 110 requirements identified above.
We then turned our attention to FMVSS No. 138. FMVSS No. 138 does
not require the TPMS telltale activation pressure to be set at a level
such that the tires at that pressure will have a load rating
appropriate for the vehicle when loaded to its capacity weight.\1\ The
standard requires the TPMS activation pressure to be the value at 25
percent below the manufacturer's recommended cold inflation pressure or
140kPa (from table 1 in FMVSS No. 138), whichever is higher. For the
subject 18-inch tires, as discussed in the previous paragraph under the
requirements of FMVSS No. 110, Honda could have specified a recommended
cold inflation pressure of 33 psi or the 36 psi and either pressure
would have been appropriate for the vehicles maximum load on the tires.
Twenty-five percent below either of these recommended inflation
pressures would have been appropriate under the requirements of FMVSS
No. 138.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Federal Register Notice 70 FR 18138, 18146 (April 8,
2005) describing NHTSA's testing of a variety of Standard Load P-
metric tires at 20 psi with 100 percent load, and no tires failed.
``This testing led the agency to conclude that warnings of less
severe conditions [i.e., in Honda's case 25 psi] will give drivers
sufficient time to check and re-inflate their vehicles' tires before
the tires experience appreciable damage.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, as relates to FMVSS No. 139, we examined the low inflation
pressure performance test required by that standard. FMVSS No. 139
specifies a low inflation pressure performance test in which the tire
is loaded to its maximum tire load capacity and inflated to only 140kPa
(20 psi), less than the TPMS telltale activation pressure for the
subject vehicles. Although NHTSA did not test a sample of the 18-inch
tire to FMVSS No. 139, tire manufacturers are required to certify that
the tires meet all applicable requirements of the standard, evidenced
by labeling each tire with the letters ``DOT.''
NHTSA's Conclusion: Honda is asking the agency to determine that
its noncompliance be deemed inconsequential to safety because it
believes the 18-inch tires have adequate load capacity at the 36 psi
recommended inflation pressure for these tires and at the lower 33 psi
recommended inflation pressure for the 17-inch tire being replaced.
NHTSA's analysis determined that Honda was correct in its assessment.
Furthermore, FMVSS No. 138 does not include a minimum tire load rating
margin requirement at the TPMS activation pressure thus a 25 percent
below either pressure would be appropriate under the standard's
requirements. NHTSA's analysis also noted that the subject tires must
be certified to the low inflation pressure performance testing of FMVSS
No. 139 which is conducted at an inflation pressure further below the
subject tires TPMS activation inflation pressures. Finally, we
conducted a search of the agency's Office of Defects Investigation's
complaint data base and found no complaints associated directly with
the incorrect TPMS activation inflation pressure thresholds for the
2008 and 2009 Honda Civic vehicles.
NHTSA's Decision: In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has
determined that Honda has adequately demonstrated, under the specific
facts and circumstances presented here, that the noncompliance with
FMVSS No. 138 in the case of 2008 and 2009 2-door and 4-door Civic SI
vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
Honda's petition is granted and the petitioner is exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of, and a remedy for, that
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at
CFR 1.50 and 501.8).
Issued on: July 17, 2012.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012-17892 Filed 7-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P