Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108; Lamp, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment, 40843-40845 [2012-16893]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public; if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Other Laws and Executive Orders
Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program
amendment to OSM for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require
us to publish a notice in the Federal
Register indicating receipt of the
proposed amendment, its text or a
summary of its terms, and an
opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed
amendment after the close of the public
comment period and determine whether
the amendment should be approved,
approved in part, or not approved. At
that time, we will also make the
determinations and certifications
required by the various laws and
executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jul 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 938
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: May 18, 2012.
Michael K. Robinson,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian
Region.
[FR Doc. 2012–16945 Filed 7–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0145]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
No. 108; Lamp, Reflective Devices, and
Associated Equipment
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for comments on
technical report.
AGENCY:
This notice requests
comments on a technical report which
evaluates new approaches for the
regulation of motor vehicle lighting
performance. Since 1968, the lighting
standard in the United States has been
updated incrementally, while lighting
technologies have in some ways
changed dramatically. We are requesting
comments on the general approaches
and specific technical merits presented
in this report. These comments, in
conjunction with the agency’s overall
priorities, will be used to shape our next
steps.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than September 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Report: The technical report
is available on the internet for viewing
in PDF format at https://
www.regulations.gov and search for this
docket number. You may obtain a copy
of the report free of charge by sending
a self-addressed mailing label to Markus
Price (NVS–121), National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
Comments: You may submit
comments [identified by Docket Number
NHTSA–2011–0145] by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40843
Transportation, West Building, Ground
Floor, Rm. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may call Docket Management at
202–366–9826.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments, see the
Procedural Matters section of this
document. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
non-legal issues, you may call Mr.
Markus Price, Office of Crash Avoidance
Standards (Phone: 202–366–0098; Fax:
202–366–7002).
You may send mail to this official at:
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 108, Lamps, reflective devices, and
associated equipment, is a complex
motor vehicle standard that has been in
effect for several decades. The agency
contracted for the preparation of a
technical report, ‘‘Feasibility of New
Approaches for the Regulation of Motor
Vehicle Lighting Performance,’’ which
discusses the feasibility of new
approaches to regulating motor vehicle
lighting equipment. The report
examines ways to effectively achieve the
purposes of the performance
requirements of FMVSS No. 108, which
is to reduce crashes and injuries by
increasing the conspicuity of motor
vehicles and adequately illuminating
the roadway. The report is available in
the docket NHTSA–2011–0145.
The report identifies several potential
opportunities for performance
requirements in the following areas:
headlighting photometry, headlamp test
voltage, sensitivity of headlamps to
vertical aim, luminance of signaling and
marking lamps, masking of front turn
signals, and reliability of photometric
testing. The report also examines other
areas, including physical lamp testing
and signal lamp angular photometry.
In addition to a literature review, the
authors of this report consulted experts
within the lighting community through
SAE International. These experts were
consulted on the potential effects of
requirements that are primarily vehiclebased. To increase transparency and
broaden the input regarding this report,
this notice requests comments from the
public. We are specifically interested in
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
40844
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
both the technical approaches taken in
the report, as well as thoughts about the
impact on the certification process if
such an approach were taken by the
agency. We request comment on any
area examined in the report that could
increase or decrease the protection
currently provided to the traveling
public.
Whole-vehicle testing (lower and
upper beam headlighting)—We are
seeking comment on the approach that
closely aligns potential requirements
with the ability of a vehicle lighting
system to provide visibility for vehicle
navigation while limiting the impacts of
glare. Our current standard primarily
treats a headlamp as a separate piece of
safety equipment that is installed on a
motor vehicle with various height and
width restrictions. Based on various
assumptions, the report translates the
angular photometric requirements for
each lamp in the current standard into
areas in three-dimensional space around
the vehicle. These areas around the
vehicle are then easily correlated to
various objects on the roadway, such as
oncoming driver eye locations and
overhead signs positions.
Headlamp test voltage—We are
seeking comment on ways to closely
align the test input parameters of
headlamps with those experienced on
vehicles in the real world. Currently,
headlamps are required to meet our
photometry requirements when tested at
12.8 V. Many vehicles currently operate
above this voltage by design.
Accordingly, the report recommends a
test voltage of 13.2 V because it would
closely represent the way headlamps
operate on the road.
Asymmetrical headlighting—We
would like comments from the public
on the merits and practicality of
allowing significantly different
performance from different headlamps
mounted on the vehicle. The report
investigates the potential for such
headlighting systems to provide
superior glare control; however, it also
notes potential issues when considering
the current marking functions of
headlamps as well as the current
redundancy within photometry.
Adaptive forward lighting—We are
seeking comment with respect to the
regulation of headlamps that adapt to
roadway conditions. This report does
not evaluate the benefits of the various
methods of adaptive forward lighting.
The report notes that the whole-vehicle
testing approach discussed above may
provide a natural framework for which
adaptive forward lighting requirements
could be established in the future. The
report notes that given that the current
standard addresses headlamp
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jul 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
photometry independent of the specifics
of the vehicle on which it is installed,
it may be difficult to evaluate the
effectiveness of modifying the aim, or
beam pattern of the headlighting system
in a dynamic environment. We are
seeking comment on how the
approaches presented in the report
could provide a foundation for dynamic
evaluation of the headlighting system in
the future.
Headlamp aim—We are seeking
comment on the expected impacts of the
approaches investigated in this report
on headlamp aim. While it is clear that
headlamp aim can be a critical factor in
determining the ability of a headlighting
system to adequately illuminate the
roadway as well as limit glare, our
current standard does not require that
headlamps be aimed as installed on a
new motor vehicle. The report notes
that under the whole vehicle testing
approach discussed above, headlamp
aim would not be considered separately
from headlamp photometry as the
measurement of the headlighting system
would take into account and measure
the amount of light directed toward
various regions of space surrounding the
vehicle. Accordingly, headlamp aim
would become an integral part of the
headlighting system performance.
Signal lamp luminance—We are
seeking comment on how to measure
the ability to see signal lighting beyond
measuring intensity and the number of
lighted sections. The judgment of
brightness is most similar to the
measurement of luminance; that is,
luminous intensity, measured in
candela, divided by the area from which
light is emitted, measured in cm2. Our
current standard addresses signal lamp
luminance in a somewhat indirect way.
While we directly measure the
luminous intensity of a lamp, for the
purposes of luminance, we approximate
the area from which the light is emitted
based on the number of lighted sections.
We are seeking comment on the ability
for new computer based design systems
to more directly measure the area from
which light is emitted and any potential
benefits of directly calculating signal
lamp luminous as well as any potential
issues associated with the approaches
presented in the report.
In addition, NHTSA also seeks
comments regarding which of the above
areas have the most potential for
improving motor vehicle safety. We are
interested in public input on which
areas to prioritize based on potential
safety benefits, considering the
availability of limited agency resources.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Procedural Matters
How can I influence NHTSA’s
thinking on this subject? NHTSA
welcomes public review of the technical
report and will review and analyze the
comments received.
How do I prepare and submit
comments? Your comments must be
written and in English. To ensure that
your comments are correctly filed in the
Docket, please include the Docket
number of this document (NHTSA–
2011–0145) in your comments. Your
primary comments must not be more
than 15 pages long (49 CFR 553.21).
However, you may attach additional
documents to your primary comments.
There is no limit on the length of the
attachments. Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477) or you may visit https://
www.regulations.gov. Please send two
paper copies of your comments to
Docket Management, fax them, or use
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. The
mailing address is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Management
Facility, M–30, West Building, Ground
Floor, Rm. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
The fax number is 1–202–493–2251. To
use the Federal eRulemaking Portal, go
to https://www.regulations.gov and
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
We also request, but do not require
you to send a copy to Markus Price,
Safety Standards Engineer, Visibility
and Injury Prevention, NVS–121,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, Room W53–312, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590 (or email them to
markus.price@dot.gov). He can check if
your comments have been received at
the Docket and he can expedite their
review by NHTSA.
How can I be sure that my comments
were received? If you wish Docket
Management to notify you upon its
receipt of your comments, enclose a
self-addressed, stamped postcard in the
envelope containing your comments.
Upon receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
How do I submit confidential business
information? If you wish to submit any
information under a claim of
confidentiality, send three copies of
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
your complete submission, including
the information you claim to be
confidential business information, to the
Chief Counsel, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Include a cover letter supplying the
information specified in our
confidential business information
regulation (49 CFR part 512). In
addition, send two copies from which
you have deleted the claimed
confidential business information to
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Management Facility, M–30,
West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, or submit them
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jul 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
Will the agency consider late
comments? In our response, we will
consider all comments that Docket
Management receives before the close of
business on the comment closing date
indicated above under DATES. To the
extent possible, we will also consider
comments that Docket Management
receives after that date. Please note that
even after the comment closing date, we
will continue to file relevant
information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may
submit late comments. Accordingly, we
recommend that you periodically check
the Docket for new material.
How can I read the comments
submitted by other people? You may
read the materials placed in the docket
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
40845
for this document (e.g., the comments
submitted in response to this document
by other interested persons) at any time
by going to https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. You may also
read the materials at the Docket
Management Facility by going to the
street address given above under
ADDRESSES. The Docket Management
Facility is open between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Issued: July 5, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012–16893 Filed 7–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40843-40845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16893]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0145]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108; Lamp, Reflective
Devices, and Associated Equipment
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for comments on technical report.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice requests comments on a technical report which
evaluates new approaches for the regulation of motor vehicle lighting
performance. Since 1968, the lighting standard in the United States has
been updated incrementally, while lighting technologies have in some
ways changed dramatically. We are requesting comments on the general
approaches and specific technical merits presented in this report.
These comments, in conjunction with the agency's overall priorities,
will be used to shape our next steps.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than September 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Report: The technical report is available on the internet
for viewing in PDF format at https://www.regulations.gov and search for
this docket number. You may obtain a copy of the report free of charge
by sending a self-addressed mailing label to Markus Price (NVS-121),
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Comments: You may submit comments [identified by Docket Number
NHTSA-2011-0145] by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may call Docket Management at 202-366-9826.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments, see
the Procedural Matters section of this document. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For non-legal issues, you may call Mr.
Markus Price, Office of Crash Avoidance Standards (Phone: 202-366-0098;
Fax: 202-366-7002).
You may send mail to this official at: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment,
is a complex motor vehicle standard that has been in effect for several
decades. The agency contracted for the preparation of a technical
report, ``Feasibility of New Approaches for the Regulation of Motor
Vehicle Lighting Performance,'' which discusses the feasibility of new
approaches to regulating motor vehicle lighting equipment. The report
examines ways to effectively achieve the purposes of the performance
requirements of FMVSS No. 108, which is to reduce crashes and injuries
by increasing the conspicuity of motor vehicles and adequately
illuminating the roadway. The report is available in the docket NHTSA-
2011-0145.
The report identifies several potential opportunities for
performance requirements in the following areas: headlighting
photometry, headlamp test voltage, sensitivity of headlamps to vertical
aim, luminance of signaling and marking lamps, masking of front turn
signals, and reliability of photometric testing. The report also
examines other areas, including physical lamp testing and signal lamp
angular photometry.
In addition to a literature review, the authors of this report
consulted experts within the lighting community through SAE
International. These experts were consulted on the potential effects of
requirements that are primarily vehicle-based. To increase transparency
and broaden the input regarding this report, this notice requests
comments from the public. We are specifically interested in
[[Page 40844]]
both the technical approaches taken in the report, as well as thoughts
about the impact on the certification process if such an approach were
taken by the agency. We request comment on any area examined in the
report that could increase or decrease the protection currently
provided to the traveling public.
Whole-vehicle testing (lower and upper beam headlighting)--We are
seeking comment on the approach that closely aligns potential
requirements with the ability of a vehicle lighting system to provide
visibility for vehicle navigation while limiting the impacts of glare.
Our current standard primarily treats a headlamp as a separate piece of
safety equipment that is installed on a motor vehicle with various
height and width restrictions. Based on various assumptions, the report
translates the angular photometric requirements for each lamp in the
current standard into areas in three-dimensional space around the
vehicle. These areas around the vehicle are then easily correlated to
various objects on the roadway, such as oncoming driver eye locations
and overhead signs positions.
Headlamp test voltage--We are seeking comment on ways to closely
align the test input parameters of headlamps with those experienced on
vehicles in the real world. Currently, headlamps are required to meet
our photometry requirements when tested at 12.8 V. Many vehicles
currently operate above this voltage by design. Accordingly, the report
recommends a test voltage of 13.2 V because it would closely represent
the way headlamps operate on the road.
Asymmetrical headlighting--We would like comments from the public
on the merits and practicality of allowing significantly different
performance from different headlamps mounted on the vehicle. The report
investigates the potential for such headlighting systems to provide
superior glare control; however, it also notes potential issues when
considering the current marking functions of headlamps as well as the
current redundancy within photometry.
Adaptive forward lighting--We are seeking comment with respect to
the regulation of headlamps that adapt to roadway conditions. This
report does not evaluate the benefits of the various methods of
adaptive forward lighting. The report notes that the whole-vehicle
testing approach discussed above may provide a natural framework for
which adaptive forward lighting requirements could be established in
the future. The report notes that given that the current standard
addresses headlamp photometry independent of the specifics of the
vehicle on which it is installed, it may be difficult to evaluate the
effectiveness of modifying the aim, or beam pattern of the headlighting
system in a dynamic environment. We are seeking comment on how the
approaches presented in the report could provide a foundation for
dynamic evaluation of the headlighting system in the future.
Headlamp aim--We are seeking comment on the expected impacts of the
approaches investigated in this report on headlamp aim. While it is
clear that headlamp aim can be a critical factor in determining the
ability of a headlighting system to adequately illuminate the roadway
as well as limit glare, our current standard does not require that
headlamps be aimed as installed on a new motor vehicle. The report
notes that under the whole vehicle testing approach discussed above,
headlamp aim would not be considered separately from headlamp
photometry as the measurement of the headlighting system would take
into account and measure the amount of light directed toward various
regions of space surrounding the vehicle. Accordingly, headlamp aim
would become an integral part of the headlighting system performance.
Signal lamp luminance--We are seeking comment on how to measure the
ability to see signal lighting beyond measuring intensity and the
number of lighted sections. The judgment of brightness is most similar
to the measurement of luminance; that is, luminous intensity, measured
in candela, divided by the area from which light is emitted, measured
in cm\2\. Our current standard addresses signal lamp luminance in a
somewhat indirect way. While we directly measure the luminous intensity
of a lamp, for the purposes of luminance, we approximate the area from
which the light is emitted based on the number of lighted sections. We
are seeking comment on the ability for new computer based design
systems to more directly measure the area from which light is emitted
and any potential benefits of directly calculating signal lamp luminous
as well as any potential issues associated with the approaches
presented in the report.
In addition, NHTSA also seeks comments regarding which of the above
areas have the most potential for improving motor vehicle safety. We
are interested in public input on which areas to prioritize based on
potential safety benefits, considering the availability of limited
agency resources.
Procedural Matters
How can I influence NHTSA's thinking on this subject? NHTSA
welcomes public review of the technical report and will review and
analyze the comments received.
How do I prepare and submit comments? Your comments must be written
and in English. To ensure that your comments are correctly filed in the
Docket, please include the Docket number of this document (NHTSA-2011-
0145) in your comments. Your primary comments must not be more than 15
pages long (49 CFR 553.21). However, you may attach additional
documents to your primary comments. There is no limit on the length of
the attachments. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477) or you may visit https://www.regulations.gov. Please send two paper copies of your comments to
Docket Management, fax them, or use the Federal eRulemaking Portal. The
mailing address is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Management
Facility, M-30, West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The fax number is 1-202-493-
2251. To use the Federal eRulemaking Portal, go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
We also request, but do not require you to send a copy to Markus
Price, Safety Standards Engineer, Visibility and Injury Prevention,
NVS-121, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Room W53-312,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 (or email them to
markus.price@dot.gov). He can check if your comments have been received
at the Docket and he can expedite their review by NHTSA.
How can I be sure that my comments were received? If you wish
Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of your comments,
enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the envelope containing
your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket Management will
return the postcard by mail.
How do I submit confidential business information? If you wish to
submit any information under a claim of confidentiality, send three
copies of
[[Page 40845]]
your complete submission, including the information you claim to be
confidential business information, to the Chief Counsel, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Include a cover letter supplying the information
specified in our confidential business information regulation (49 CFR
part 512). In addition, send two copies from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business information to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Management Facility, M-30, West Building, Ground
Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
or submit them via the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Will the agency consider late comments? In our response, we will
consider all comments that Docket Management receives before the close
of business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. To
the extent possible, we will also consider comments that Docket
Management receives after that date. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in
the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit
late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically check
the Docket for new material.
How can I read the comments submitted by other people? You may read
the materials placed in the docket for this document (e.g., the
comments submitted in response to this document by other interested
persons) at any time by going to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for accessing the dockets. You may also read the
materials at the Docket Management Facility by going to the street
address given above under ADDRESSES. The Docket Management Facility is
open between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Issued: July 5, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012-16893 Filed 7-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P