Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Clarify the Ability of the Government Securities Division To Use Implied Volatility Indicators as Part of the Volatility Model in Its Clearing Fund Formula, 40398-40399 [2012-16653]
Download as PDF
40398
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2012 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGA–2012–27. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–EDGA–
2012–27, and should be submitted on or
before July 30, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–16624 Filed 7–6–12; 8:45 am]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Jul 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67336; File No. SR–FICC–
2012–04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To
Clarify the Ability of the Government
Securities Division To Use Implied
Volatility Indicators as Part of the
Volatility Model in Its Clearing Fund
Formula
July 2, 2012.
I. Introduction
On May 15, 2012, the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposed
rule change SR–FICC–2012–04 pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder.2 The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on May 31, 2012.3
The Commission received no comment
letters regarding the proposal. For the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission is granting approval of the
proposed rule change.
II. Description
This proposed rule change relates to
the use of implied volatility indicators
in the clearing fund formula of FICC’s
Government Securities Division
(‘‘GSD’’). As discussed in FICC’s filing
with the Commission, a primary
objective of GSD’s clearing fund
(‘‘Clearing Fund’’) 4 is to have on
deposit from each applicable Member 5
assets sufficient to satisfy losses that
may otherwise be incurred by GSD as
the result of the default of the Member
and the resultant close out of that
Member’s unsettled positions under
GSD’s trade guaranty. The required
Clearing Fund deposit of each Member
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–67059
(May 24, 2012), 77 FR 32153 (May 31, 2012). In its
filing with the Commission, FICC included a
detailed statement regarding the purposes of and
basis for the proposed rule change. See id.
4 FICC GSD Rule 1—Definitions provides that
‘‘[t]he term ‘Clearing Fund’ means the Clearing
Fund established by the Corporation pursuant to
these Rules, which shall be comprised of the
aggregate of all Required Fund Deposits and all
other deposits, including Cross-Guaranty
Repayment Deposits, to the Clearing Fund.’’
5 FICC GSD Rule 1—Definitions provides that
‘‘[t]he term ‘Member’ means a Comparison-Only
Member or a Netting Member. The term ‘Member’
shall include a Sponsoring Member in its capacity
as a Sponsoring Member and a Sponsored Member,
each to the extent specific in Rule 3A.’’
PO 00000
1 15
2 17
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is calculated twice daily 6 pursuant to a
formula set forth in Section 1b of GSD
Rule 4 designed to provide sufficient
funds to cover this risk of loss. The
Clearing Fund formula accounts for a
variety of risk factors through the
application of a number of components,
each described in Section 1b of GSD
Rule 4.
The volatility component of the
Clearing Fund formula is designed to
calculate the amount of money that may
be lost on a portfolio over a given period
of time assumed necessary to liquidate
the portfolio within a given level of
confidence. Pursuant to Section 1b of
Rule 4, GSD may calculate the volatility
component on a value at risk charge
(‘‘VaR Charge’’) ‘‘utilizing such
assumptions (including confidence
levels) and based on such historical data
as [GSD] deems reasonable, and shall
cover such range of historical volatility
as [GSD] from time to time deems
appropriate.’’ 7 FICC believes that
Section 1b of Rule 4 therefore provides
GSD with the flexibility to adjust the
calculation of the volatility component
of its Clearing Fund formula as needed
to react to changes in market conditions,
including through the use of such
assumptions and data as it deems
appropriate within its VaR Charge.
The historical simulation model
currently used to calculate the VaR
Charge in GSD’s Clearing Fund formula
is driven by historical data observed in
the fixed-income market. While the
model weighs the data it uses in favor
of more recent observations, it is still
limited in its ability to quickly reflect
sudden changes in market volatility,
which may lead to the collection of
insufficient margin during periods of
sudden market volatility.
GSD’s Clearing Fund formula, in
particular the VaR Charge, provides
GSD with the discretion to adjust the
model assumptions and data as
necessary to react to these market
conditions. To enhance the model’s
performance, additional information
and other observable market data,
including data derived from financial
products with future maturity dates,
thus may be incorporated into or
utilized by the volatility model,
including data observed in implied
volatility indicators that are derived
from historical prices of financial
products that have maturity dates in the
future (such as the 1-year option on the
10-year swap rate). For the avoidance of
doubt, this proposed rule change
6 A Member’s Clearing Fund deposit may also be
recalculated on an intraday basis as needed.
7 FICC GSD Rule 1—Definitions defining the term
VaR Charge in relevant part.
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2012 / Notices
impact on their margin requirement.
Although the Augmented Volatility
Adjustment Multiplier will be
automatically applied to each Member’s
VaR Charge, GSD may in its sole
discretion determine to waive the
application of the Augmented Volatility
Adjustment Multiplier to all of its
Members in circumstances it deems
warrant such a waiver.10
FICC intends that this proposed rule
change would be effective on a date no
less than ten business days following an
Important Notice to Members by FICC
announcing any approval by the
Commission.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
amends the definition of VaR Charge to
make clear that the assumptions and
data utilized in calculating the VaR
Charge may be based on observable
market data, which may include
implied market volatility indicators that
are derived from historical prices of
financial products that have maturity
dates in the future, so as to enhance the
performance of the model and enable
GSD to more effectively achieve and
maintain the confidence level required
by regulatory and industry standards.8
Incorporation of such information into
volatility calculations is a generally
accepted practice for portfolio volatility
models, currently used by other clearing
agencies, and accordingly consistent
with current rules of FICC.
The proposed rule change clarifies
that GSD at its discretion may utilize
implied volatility indicators that are
derived from historical prices of
financial products that have maturity
dates in the future among the
assumptions and other observable
market data as part of its volatility
model. The proposal also clarifies the
ability of GSD to adjust its volatility
calculations as needed to improve the
performance of the model in periods of
market volatility. It therefore assists
GSD to maintain the requisite
confidence level notwithstanding those
market conditions.
As an example of one such
adjustment to the volatility model, GSD
will apply a multiplier (‘‘Augmented
Volatility Adjustment Multiplier’’) to
the VaR Charge. The Augmented
Volatility Adjustment Multiplier is
based on the levels of change in current
and implied volatility measures. An
advantage of this approach is that as
volatility subsides in the market so will
the effect of the Augmented Volatility
Adjustment Multiplier on Members’
margin requirements. The volatility
measures will be determined by
reference to the implied volatility of the
1-year option on the 10-year USD LIBOR
swap rate and the historical volatility of
the 10-year USD LIBOR swap rate. It is
expected that GSD will provide its
Members with advance notice of the
Augmented Volatility Adjustment
Multiplier that may be applied to the
Members’ VaR Charge on a weekly
basis.9 By using a single fixed multiplier
based on observable market data,
Members will be able to predict the
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of
Section 17A of the Act, as well as with
the rules and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) 13 of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
8 The text of the proposed change to the
definition of VaR Charge can be found in Exhibit
5 to proposed rule change SR–FICC–2012–04 at
https://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/
2012/ficc/SR-FICC-2012-04.pdf.
9 FICC GSD will reserve the right to recalculate
the multiplier more frequently than weekly in
volatile market conditions.
10 FICC GSD plans to apply a cap to the
Augmented Volatility Adjustment Multiplier and
initially the cap will be set at 2. FICC GSD will
reserve the right to change the cap in its sole
discretion.
11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
12 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Jul 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
III. Discussion
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 11
directs the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a selfregulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization. In
particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act 12 requires, among other things, that
the rules of a clearing agency be
designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions, and to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds that
are in the custody or control of such
clearing agency or for which it is
responsible. The proposed rule change
would clarify that FICC GSD’s rules
permit it to use implied volatility
indicators that are derived from
historical prices of financial products
that have maturity dates in the future as
part of the volatility model in its
Clearing Fund formula. The use of these
indicators should assist GSD in its
efforts to ensure the efficacy of its
volatility margin methodology in highly
volatile markets and, thereby, reduce
GSD’s and its Members’ exposure to the
losses of a defaulting Member.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40399
FICC–2012–04) be, and hereby is,
approved.14
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–16653 Filed 7–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 500–1]
Qiao Xing Universal Resources, Inc.,
and Qiao Xing Mobile Communication
Co., Ltd.; Order of Suspension of
Trading
July 5, 2012.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (’’Commission’’)
that there is a lack of current and
accurate information concerning the
securities of Qiao Xing Universal
Resources, Inc. (‘‘XING’’), a British
Virgin Islands corporation with
headquarters and operations in the
People’s Republic of China. Those
securities now trade in the over-thecounter market under the symbol
XINGF since trading in them was
suspended by the NASDAQ Stock
Market Inc. (‘‘NASDAQ’’) on May 10,
2012.
Questions have arisen regarding the
accuracy and completeness of
information contained in XING’s public
filings with the Commission concerning,
among other things, the effectiveness of
XING’s internal control over financial
reporting. It appears to the Commission
that relevant information has not been
disclosed about XING, including the
following: (1) Its CFO resigned; (2) its
independent auditor resigned; and (3)
its US counsel resigned.
It also appears to the Commission that
there is a lack of current and accurate
information concerning the securities of
Qiao Xing Mobile Communication Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘QXM’’), a British Virgin Islands
corporation with headquarters and
operations in the People’s Republic of
China, which now trades in the overthe-counter market under the symbol
QXMCF since it was suspended by the
New York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) on
May 18, 2012.
It appears to the Commission that
relevant information has not been
disclosed about QXM, including the
14 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40398-40399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16653]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-67336; File No. SR-FICC-2012-04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Clarify the Ability of the
Government Securities Division To Use Implied Volatility Indicators as
Part of the Volatility Model in Its Clearing Fund Formula
July 2, 2012.
I. Introduction
On May 15, 2012, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'')
proposed rule change SR-FICC-2012-04 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on May 31, 2012.\3\ The Commission received no
comment letters regarding the proposal. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is granting approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-67059 (May 24, 2012),
77 FR 32153 (May 31, 2012). In its filing with the Commission, FICC
included a detailed statement regarding the purposes of and basis
for the proposed rule change. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description
This proposed rule change relates to the use of implied volatility
indicators in the clearing fund formula of FICC's Government Securities
Division (``GSD''). As discussed in FICC's filing with the Commission,
a primary objective of GSD's clearing fund (``Clearing Fund'') \4\ is
to have on deposit from each applicable Member \5\ assets sufficient to
satisfy losses that may otherwise be incurred by GSD as the result of
the default of the Member and the resultant close out of that Member's
unsettled positions under GSD's trade guaranty. The required Clearing
Fund deposit of each Member is calculated twice daily \6\ pursuant to a
formula set forth in Section 1b of GSD Rule 4 designed to provide
sufficient funds to cover this risk of loss. The Clearing Fund formula
accounts for a variety of risk factors through the application of a
number of components, each described in Section 1b of GSD Rule 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ FICC GSD Rule 1--Definitions provides that ``[t]he term
`Clearing Fund' means the Clearing Fund established by the
Corporation pursuant to these Rules, which shall be comprised of the
aggregate of all Required Fund Deposits and all other deposits,
including Cross-Guaranty Repayment Deposits, to the Clearing Fund.''
\5\ FICC GSD Rule 1--Definitions provides that ``[t]he term
`Member' means a Comparison-Only Member or a Netting Member. The
term `Member' shall include a Sponsoring Member in its capacity as a
Sponsoring Member and a Sponsored Member, each to the extent
specific in Rule 3A.''
\6\ A Member's Clearing Fund deposit may also be recalculated on
an intraday basis as needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The volatility component of the Clearing Fund formula is designed
to calculate the amount of money that may be lost on a portfolio over a
given period of time assumed necessary to liquidate the portfolio
within a given level of confidence. Pursuant to Section 1b of Rule 4,
GSD may calculate the volatility component on a value at risk charge
(``VaR Charge'') ``utilizing such assumptions (including confidence
levels) and based on such historical data as [GSD] deems reasonable,
and shall cover such range of historical volatility as [GSD] from time
to time deems appropriate.'' \7\ FICC believes that Section 1b of Rule
4 therefore provides GSD with the flexibility to adjust the calculation
of the volatility component of its Clearing Fund formula as needed to
react to changes in market conditions, including through the use of
such assumptions and data as it deems appropriate within its VaR
Charge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ FICC GSD Rule 1--Definitions defining the term VaR Charge in
relevant part.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The historical simulation model currently used to calculate the VaR
Charge in GSD's Clearing Fund formula is driven by historical data
observed in the fixed-income market. While the model weighs the data it
uses in favor of more recent observations, it is still limited in its
ability to quickly reflect sudden changes in market volatility, which
may lead to the collection of insufficient margin during periods of
sudden market volatility.
GSD's Clearing Fund formula, in particular the VaR Charge, provides
GSD with the discretion to adjust the model assumptions and data as
necessary to react to these market conditions. To enhance the model's
performance, additional information and other observable market data,
including data derived from financial products with future maturity
dates, thus may be incorporated into or utilized by the volatility
model, including data observed in implied volatility indicators that
are derived from historical prices of financial products that have
maturity dates in the future (such as the 1-year option on the 10-year
swap rate). For the avoidance of doubt, this proposed rule change
[[Page 40399]]
amends the definition of VaR Charge to make clear that the assumptions
and data utilized in calculating the VaR Charge may be based on
observable market data, which may include implied market volatility
indicators that are derived from historical prices of financial
products that have maturity dates in the future, so as to enhance the
performance of the model and enable GSD to more effectively achieve and
maintain the confidence level required by regulatory and industry
standards.\8\ Incorporation of such information into volatility
calculations is a generally accepted practice for portfolio volatility
models, currently used by other clearing agencies, and accordingly
consistent with current rules of FICC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The text of the proposed change to the definition of VaR
Charge can be found in Exhibit 5 to proposed rule change SR-FICC-
2012-04 at https://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/2012/ficc/SR-FICC-2012-04.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change clarifies that GSD at its discretion may
utilize implied volatility indicators that are derived from historical
prices of financial products that have maturity dates in the future
among the assumptions and other observable market data as part of its
volatility model. The proposal also clarifies the ability of GSD to
adjust its volatility calculations as needed to improve the performance
of the model in periods of market volatility. It therefore assists GSD
to maintain the requisite confidence level notwithstanding those market
conditions.
As an example of one such adjustment to the volatility model, GSD
will apply a multiplier (``Augmented Volatility Adjustment
Multiplier'') to the VaR Charge. The Augmented Volatility Adjustment
Multiplier is based on the levels of change in current and implied
volatility measures. An advantage of this approach is that as
volatility subsides in the market so will the effect of the Augmented
Volatility Adjustment Multiplier on Members' margin requirements. The
volatility measures will be determined by reference to the implied
volatility of the 1-year option on the 10-year USD LIBOR swap rate and
the historical volatility of the 10-year USD LIBOR swap rate. It is
expected that GSD will provide its Members with advance notice of the
Augmented Volatility Adjustment Multiplier that may be applied to the
Members' VaR Charge on a weekly basis.\9\ By using a single fixed
multiplier based on observable market data, Members will be able to
predict the impact on their margin requirement. Although the Augmented
Volatility Adjustment Multiplier will be automatically applied to each
Member's VaR Charge, GSD may in its sole discretion determine to waive
the application of the Augmented Volatility Adjustment Multiplier to
all of its Members in circumstances it deems warrant such a waiver.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ FICC GSD will reserve the right to recalculate the
multiplier more frequently than weekly in volatile market
conditions.
\10\ FICC GSD plans to apply a cap to the Augmented Volatility
Adjustment Multiplier and initially the cap will be set at 2. FICC
GSD will reserve the right to change the cap in its sole discretion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FICC intends that this proposed rule change would be effective on a
date no less than ten business days following an Important Notice to
Members by FICC announcing any approval by the Commission.
III. Discussion
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \11\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it
finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization. In particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act \12\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing
agency be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions, and to assure the safeguarding
of securities and funds that are in the custody or control of such
clearing agency or for which it is responsible. The proposed rule
change would clarify that FICC GSD's rules permit it to use implied
volatility indicators that are derived from historical prices of
financial products that have maturity dates in the future as part of
the volatility model in its Clearing Fund formula. The use of these
indicators should assist GSD in its efforts to ensure the efficacy of
its volatility margin methodology in highly volatile markets and,
thereby, reduce GSD's and its Members' exposure to the losses of a
defaulting Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
in particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act, as well
as with the rules and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) \13\ of the
Act, that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-FICC-2012-04) be, and
hereby is, approved.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\14\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-16653 Filed 7-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P