Certain Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing Same; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion for Leave To Amend the Complainant and Notice of Investigation, 39510 [2012-16201]

Download as PDF srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 39510 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2012 / Notices affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the requested remedial orders are used in the United States; (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the requested remedial orders; (iii) Identify like or directly competitive articles that complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States which could replace the subject articles if they were to be excluded; (iv) Indicate whether complainant, complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to the requested exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time; and (v) Explain how the requested remedial orders would impact United States consumers. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business, eight calendar days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8 true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2902’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, http:// www.usitc.gov/secretary/ fed_reg_notices/rules/ handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202–205– 2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:27 Jul 02, 2012 Jkt 226001 Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 27, 2012. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2012–16202 Filed 7–2–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–840] Certain Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing Same; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Unopposed Motion for Leave To Amend the Complainant and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 7) granting complainant’s unopposed motion for leave to amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation (‘‘NOI’’) in the above-referenced investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted this investigation on May 1, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated of Chandler, Arizona (‘‘Microchip’’). 77 FR 25747–48 (May 1, 2012). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor integrated circuit devices and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,225,088; 6,245,597; 6,159,765; 5,760,720 (‘‘the ’720 patent’’); 6,559,783; and 6,847,904. The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents Intersil Corporation of Milpitas, California; Zilker Labs, Inc. of Austin, Texas (‘‘Zilker’’); and Techwell LLC of Milpitas, California. The Office of Unfair Import Investigation was not named as a participating party. On June 5, 2012, Microchip filed a motion for leave to amend its Complaint and the NOI to change the name of respondent Zilker to Zilker Labs LLC. The motion also sought leave to amend Exhibit 74 to the Complaint to correct a clerical error regarding the identification of a Microchip product that allegedly practices the ‘720 patent. The motion indicated that no party opposed Microchip’s request. On June 7, 2012, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting Microchip’s motion pursuant to section 210.14(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)). No petitions for review of this ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By order of the Commission. Issued: June 27, 2012. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2012–16201 Filed 7–2–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 39510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-840]


Certain Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Devices and Products 
Containing Same; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion for Leave To Amend the 
Complainant and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 7) 
granting complainant's unopposed motion for leave to amend the 
Complaint and Notice of Investigation (``NOI'') in the above-referenced 
investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on May 1, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Microchip Technology 
Incorporated of Chandler, Arizona (``Microchip''). 77 FR 25747-48 (May 
1, 2012). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain semiconductor integrated circuit 
devices and products containing same by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,225,088; 6,245,597; 6,159,765; 
5,760,720 (``the '720 patent''); 6,559,783; and 6,847,904. The 
complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The 
Commission's notice of investigation named as respondents Intersil 
Corporation of Milpitas, California; Zilker Labs, Inc. of Austin, Texas 
(``Zilker''); and Techwell LLC of Milpitas, California. The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigation was not named as a participating party.
    On June 5, 2012, Microchip filed a motion for leave to amend its 
Complaint and the NOI to change the name of respondent Zilker to Zilker 
Labs LLC. The motion also sought leave to amend Exhibit 74 to the 
Complaint to correct a clerical error regarding the identification of a 
Microchip product that allegedly practices the `720 patent. The motion 
indicated that no party opposed Microchip's request.
    On June 7, 2012, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting 
Microchip's motion pursuant to section 210.14(b)(1) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)). No petitions for 
review of this ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: June 27, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-16201 Filed 7-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P