Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Technical and Conforming Amendments to the Pricing Schedule, 38699-38701 [2012-15808]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Notices
clearance’’ and FINRA has deployed
(and continues to deploy) significant
technology resources and process
enhancements to accommodate those
needs.7 The Department also has seen
growth in filings of unlisted REITs,
business development companies and
other DPPs, which raise complex issues.
In support of its reviews under FINRA
Rule 5110 and other regulatory
responsibilities, FINRA is proposing to
increase the rate and the fee cap for
filings pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110.
This fee, which is assessed on members,
though typically borne by issuers, funds
the Department’s reviews as well as
FINRA’s extensive regulatory programs
and services that support the public
capital markets being accessed by
issuers through such member firms. The
proposed fee would increase the rate of
the filing fee from .01 percent to .015
percent of the proposed maximum
aggregate offering price or other
applicable value of the securities, and
would increase the maximum fee from
$75,500 to $225,500.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Implementation
FINRA has filed the proposed rule
change for immediate effectiveness.
FINRA is proposing that the
implementation date of the proposed
rule change will be July 2, 2012.
Specifically, the proposed adjusted fees
and fee cap would become effective for
filings and amendments made on or
after July 2, 2012.
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,8 which
requires, among other things, that
FINRA rules provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and
issuers and other persons using any
facility or system that FINRA operates
or controls. FINRA believes that the
proposed fees are reasonable based on
the nature and scope of the
Department’s review pursuant to FINRA
Rule 5110. The proposed fee also
contributes to the general funding of
FINRA’s overall regulatory program and
serves to ensure that FINRA is
sufficiently capitalized to meet its
regulatory responsibilities. The
proposed fees are equitably allocated
among members (or borne by issuers) as
they are assessed as a percentage of the
aggregate maximum offering proceeds in
much the same way that SEC
registration fees are assessed under
Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of
e.g., Regulatory Notice 12–22 (April 2012).
8 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(5).
1933. Moreover, the cap on offerings
above $1.5 billion ensures that the fees
collected from any particular member
(or borne by any particular issuer) with
respect to a filing are equitably allocated
and not disproportionately borne by
members (or issuers) participating in the
very largest offerings.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act.9 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.] [sic]
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–FINRA–2012–029 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
7 See,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2012–029. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal offices of
FINRA. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2012–029, and
should be submitted on or before July
19, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–15805 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67245; File No. SR–Phlx–
2012–80]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Technical and Conforming
Amendments to the Pricing Schedule
June 22, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that, on June 14,
2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
10 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
9 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(i). [sic]
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38699
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
38700
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Notices
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to make
various technical amendments to the
Pricing Schedule to format pricing the
same throughout the Pricing Schedule,
correct a reference to Section IV fees
and add the term ‘‘Specialist’’ to Section
V.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to make
clarifying amendments to the Pricing
Schedule. The Exchange proposes to
amend Section II entitled ‘‘Multiply
Listed Options’’ to reformat the rebates
and fees from the current format,
‘‘$.xx,’’ to the format utilized in Section
I, ‘‘$0.xx,’’ to conform the pricing format
throughout the Pricing Schedule.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
Section IV, A entitled ‘‘PIXL Pricing’’ to
correct a reference which was
inadvertently not amended in a prior
filing to refer to Section II fees as
‘‘Multiply Listed Options.’’ The
Exchange recently amended the title of
Section II from ‘‘Equity Options Fees’’ to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
‘‘Multiply Listed Options Fees.’’ 3
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
amend Section V entitled ‘‘Routing
Fees’’ to add the term ‘‘Specialist’’ to the
category ‘‘Firm/Broker Dealer/Market
Maker.’’ The Exchange recently
amended the Pricing Schedule to
redefine its market participant
categories and separate the Specialist
category from that of Market Maker.4 At
that time, the Exchange also filed SR–
Phlx–2012–75, a filing pertaining to
Routing Fees, and noted in that filing
that for the purposes of Routing Fees, a
Market Maker includes Specialists.5 At
this time the Exchange proposes to
indicate that a Specialist shall be as
defined in the Pricing Schedule and add
the Specialist category to the Routing
Fees. The Exchange believes that using
the defined terms for purposes of the
Routing Fees will provide more clarity
to the Pricing Schedule and therefore
proposes to add the term Specialist to
the fees instead of utilizing the term
Market Maker to define a Specialist
solely for the Routing Fees.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Pricing Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act 6 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 7
in particular, in that it is an equitable
allocation of reasonable fees and other
charges among Exchange members and
other persons using its facilities.
The Exchange’s amendments to
Section II are reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because the
amendments are not substantive in
nature, but merely conform the manner
in which the pricing is displayed so that
the format is similar throughout the
Pricing Schedule.
The Exchange’s amendment to
Section IV is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because this
amendment clarifies the Pricing
Schedule by correcting a reference that
was inadvertently omitted in a prior
filing to refer to Section II fees.
The Exchange’s amendment to
Section V is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because it
also clarifies the Pricing Schedule by
reverting to the terms as defined in the
Preface. Today, a Specialist is defined in
the Pricing Schedule as a separately
defined market participant apart from a
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67189
(June 12, 2012) (SR–Phlx–2012–77).
4 Id.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67123
(June 5, 2012), 77 FR 35092 (June 12, 2012) (SR–
Phlx–2012–75). Specifically, see note 3.
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Market Maker,8 although the Exchange
noted in a separate filing that for
purposes of Routing Fees a Market
Maker includes a Specialist.9 The
Exchange now proposes to utilize the
definition of Specialist, as defined in
the Preface of the Pricing Schedule, for
consistency. The Routing Fees which
are applicable to a Specialist will
remain the same.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.10 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2012–80 on the
subject line.
8 See
SR–Phlx–2012–77.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67123
(June 5, 2012), 77 FR 35092 (June 12, 2012) (SR–
Phlx–2012–75). Specifically, see note 3.
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
9 See
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2012–80. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2012–80 and should be submitted on or
before July 19, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–15808 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–67244; File No. SR–
NYSEArca-2012–67]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca
Rule 3.2 and NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.
Rule 3.2, Which Concern the
Nomination and Election of Fair
Representation Directors
June 22, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 18,
2012, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by NYSE Arca. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Arca Rule 3.2 and NYSE Arca
Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’)
Rule 3.2, which concern the nomination
and election of fair representation
directors. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jun 27, 2012
2 17
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38701
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Arca Rule 3.2 and NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 3.2, which concern the
nomination and election of fair
representation directors.
Background
Section 6(b)(3) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
‘‘Act’’), requires that the rules of an
exchange shall ‘‘assure a fair
representation of its members in the
selection of its directors and
administration of its affairs and provide
that one or more directors shall be
representative of issuers and investors
and not be associated with a member of
the exchange, broker, or dealer.’’ 3
Exchange members who serve on
exchange boards thus are sometimes
referred to as ‘‘fair representation
directors.’’ NYSE Arca Rule 3.2 sets
forth a process for the nomination and
selection of fair representation directors
for the NYSE Arca Board of Directors
(‘‘NYSE Arca Board’’), and NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 3.2 sets forth a similar
process for the nomination and
selection of fair representation directors
for the NYSE Arca Equities Board of
Directors (‘‘Equities Board’’).4
The Exchange proposes to amend
both rules to streamline those processes
and make them more similar to the
processes used by the New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) 5 and NYSE
MKT LLC (‘‘NYSE MKT’’).6
Amendments to NYSE Arca Rules
Under Section 3.02(a) of the NYSE
Arca Bylaws, the NYSE Arca Board
must have 8–12 Directors, and at least
3 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(3).
Arca Equities is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of NYSE Arca.
5 See Section 2.03(a) of the Third Amended and
Restated Operating Agreement of New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE Operating Agreement’’),
available at https://usequities.nyx.com/sites/
corporate.nyx.com/files/thirdamendedandrestated
operatingagreementofnewyorkstockexchangellc.pdf
[sic]; Article III, Sections 1(C) and 5 of the
Amended and Restated Bylaws of NYSE Market,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE Market Bylaws’’), available at https://
usequities.nyx.com/sites/usequities.nyx.com/files/
final_second_amended_and_restated_bylaws_of_
nyse_market_inc_0.pdf and Article III, Sections 1(C)
and 5 of the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws
of NYSE Regulation, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Regulation
Bylaws’’), available at https://www.nyse.com/pdfs/
SecondAmendedandRestatedBylawsofNYSE
RegulationInc.PDF.
6 See Second Amended and Restated Operating
Agreement of NYSE MKT LLC (‘‘NYSE MKT
Operating Agreement’’), Section 2.03(a) and (h),
available at https://nyseamexrules.nyse.com/AMEX/
pdf/operating_agreement.pdf.
4 NYSE
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38699-38701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15808]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-67245; File No. SR-Phlx-2012-80]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Technical and Conforming Amendments to the Pricing Schedule
June 22, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that, on June 14, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
[[Page 38700]]
(``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to make various technical amendments to the
Pricing Schedule to format pricing the same throughout the Pricing
Schedule, correct a reference to Section IV fees and add the term
``Specialist'' to Section V.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to make clarifying amendments to the Pricing
Schedule. The Exchange proposes to amend Section II entitled ``Multiply
Listed Options'' to reformat the rebates and fees from the current
format, ``$.xx,'' to the format utilized in Section I, ``$0.xx,'' to
conform the pricing format throughout the Pricing Schedule.
The Exchange also proposes to amend Section IV, A entitled ``PIXL
Pricing'' to correct a reference which was inadvertently not amended in
a prior filing to refer to Section II fees as ``Multiply Listed
Options.'' The Exchange recently amended the title of Section II from
``Equity Options Fees'' to ``Multiply Listed Options Fees.'' \3\
Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend Section V entitled ``Routing
Fees'' to add the term ``Specialist'' to the category ``Firm/Broker
Dealer/Market Maker.'' The Exchange recently amended the Pricing
Schedule to redefine its market participant categories and separate the
Specialist category from that of Market Maker.\4\ At that time, the
Exchange also filed SR-Phlx-2012-75, a filing pertaining to Routing
Fees, and noted in that filing that for the purposes of Routing Fees, a
Market Maker includes Specialists.\5\ At this time the Exchange
proposes to indicate that a Specialist shall be as defined in the
Pricing Schedule and add the Specialist category to the Routing Fees.
The Exchange believes that using the defined terms for purposes of the
Routing Fees will provide more clarity to the Pricing Schedule and
therefore proposes to add the term Specialist to the fees instead of
utilizing the term Market Maker to define a Specialist solely for the
Routing Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67189 (June 12,
2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-77).
\4\ Id.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67123 (June 5,
2012), 77 FR 35092 (June 12, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-75). Specifically,
see note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing
Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \7\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's amendments to Section II are reasonable, equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because the amendments are not
substantive in nature, but merely conform the manner in which the
pricing is displayed so that the format is similar throughout the
Pricing Schedule.
The Exchange's amendment to Section IV is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because this amendment clarifies the
Pricing Schedule by correcting a reference that was inadvertently
omitted in a prior filing to refer to Section II fees.
The Exchange's amendment to Section V is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because it also clarifies the Pricing
Schedule by reverting to the terms as defined in the Preface. Today, a
Specialist is defined in the Pricing Schedule as a separately defined
market participant apart from a Market Maker,\8\ although the Exchange
noted in a separate filing that for purposes of Routing Fees a Market
Maker includes a Specialist.\9\ The Exchange now proposes to utilize
the definition of Specialist, as defined in the Preface of the Pricing
Schedule, for consistency. The Routing Fees which are applicable to a
Specialist will remain the same.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See SR-Phlx-2012-77.
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67123 (June 5,
2012), 77 FR 35092 (June 12, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-75). Specifically,
see note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2012-80 on the subject line.
[[Page 38701]]
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-80. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-80 and should be
submitted on or before July 19, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-15808 Filed 6-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P