Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Technical and Conforming Amendments to the Pricing Schedule, 38699-38701 [2012-15808]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Notices clearance’’ and FINRA has deployed (and continues to deploy) significant technology resources and process enhancements to accommodate those needs.7 The Department also has seen growth in filings of unlisted REITs, business development companies and other DPPs, which raise complex issues. In support of its reviews under FINRA Rule 5110 and other regulatory responsibilities, FINRA is proposing to increase the rate and the fee cap for filings pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110. This fee, which is assessed on members, though typically borne by issuers, funds the Department’s reviews as well as FINRA’s extensive regulatory programs and services that support the public capital markets being accessed by issuers through such member firms. The proposed fee would increase the rate of the filing fee from .01 percent to .015 percent of the proposed maximum aggregate offering price or other applicable value of the securities, and would increase the maximum fee from $75,500 to $225,500. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Implementation FINRA has filed the proposed rule change for immediate effectiveness. FINRA is proposing that the implementation date of the proposed rule change will be July 2, 2012. Specifically, the proposed adjusted fees and fee cap would become effective for filings and amendments made on or after July 2, 2012. 2. Statutory Basis FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,8 which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system that FINRA operates or controls. FINRA believes that the proposed fees are reasonable based on the nature and scope of the Department’s review pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110. The proposed fee also contributes to the general funding of FINRA’s overall regulatory program and serves to ensure that FINRA is sufficiently capitalized to meet its regulatory responsibilities. The proposed fees are equitably allocated among members (or borne by issuers) as they are assessed as a percentage of the aggregate maximum offering proceeds in much the same way that SEC registration fees are assessed under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of e.g., Regulatory Notice 12–22 (April 2012). 8 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(5). 1933. Moreover, the cap on offerings above $1.5 billion ensures that the fees collected from any particular member (or borne by any particular issuer) with respect to a filing are equitably allocated and not disproportionately borne by members (or issuers) participating in the very largest offerings. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act.9 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.] [sic] IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–FINRA–2012–029 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. 7 See, VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:35 Jun 27, 2012 Jkt 226001 All submissions should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–2012–029. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of FINRA. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–2012–029, and should be submitted on or before July 19, 2012. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.10 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–15805 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–67245; File No. SR–Phlx– 2012–80] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Technical and Conforming Amendments to the Pricing Schedule June 22, 2012. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder, notice is hereby given that, on June 14, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC 10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 9 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(i). [sic] Frm 00131 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38699 E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM 28JNN1 38700 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Notices (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to make various technical amendments to the Pricing Schedule to format pricing the same throughout the Pricing Schedule, correct a reference to Section IV fees and add the term ‘‘Specialist’’ to Section V. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/ micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to make clarifying amendments to the Pricing Schedule. The Exchange proposes to amend Section II entitled ‘‘Multiply Listed Options’’ to reformat the rebates and fees from the current format, ‘‘$.xx,’’ to the format utilized in Section I, ‘‘$0.xx,’’ to conform the pricing format throughout the Pricing Schedule. The Exchange also proposes to amend Section IV, A entitled ‘‘PIXL Pricing’’ to correct a reference which was inadvertently not amended in a prior filing to refer to Section II fees as ‘‘Multiply Listed Options.’’ The Exchange recently amended the title of Section II from ‘‘Equity Options Fees’’ to VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:35 Jun 27, 2012 Jkt 226001 ‘‘Multiply Listed Options Fees.’’ 3 Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend Section V entitled ‘‘Routing Fees’’ to add the term ‘‘Specialist’’ to the category ‘‘Firm/Broker Dealer/Market Maker.’’ The Exchange recently amended the Pricing Schedule to redefine its market participant categories and separate the Specialist category from that of Market Maker.4 At that time, the Exchange also filed SR– Phlx–2012–75, a filing pertaining to Routing Fees, and noted in that filing that for the purposes of Routing Fees, a Market Maker includes Specialists.5 At this time the Exchange proposes to indicate that a Specialist shall be as defined in the Pricing Schedule and add the Specialist category to the Routing Fees. The Exchange believes that using the defined terms for purposes of the Routing Fees will provide more clarity to the Pricing Schedule and therefore proposes to add the term Specialist to the fees instead of utilizing the term Market Maker to define a Specialist solely for the Routing Fees. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 6 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 7 in particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange’s amendments to Section II are reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the amendments are not substantive in nature, but merely conform the manner in which the pricing is displayed so that the format is similar throughout the Pricing Schedule. The Exchange’s amendment to Section IV is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because this amendment clarifies the Pricing Schedule by correcting a reference that was inadvertently omitted in a prior filing to refer to Section II fees. The Exchange’s amendment to Section V is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it also clarifies the Pricing Schedule by reverting to the terms as defined in the Preface. Today, a Specialist is defined in the Pricing Schedule as a separately defined market participant apart from a 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67189 (June 12, 2012) (SR–Phlx–2012–77). 4 Id. 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67123 (June 5, 2012), 77 FR 35092 (June 12, 2012) (SR– Phlx–2012–75). Specifically, see note 3. 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Market Maker,8 although the Exchange noted in a separate filing that for purposes of Routing Fees a Market Maker includes a Specialist.9 The Exchange now proposes to utilize the definition of Specialist, as defined in the Preface of the Pricing Schedule, for consistency. The Routing Fees which are applicable to a Specialist will remain the same. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.10 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–Phlx–2012–80 on the subject line. 8 See SR–Phlx–2012–77. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67123 (June 5, 2012), 77 FR 35092 (June 12, 2012) (SR– Phlx–2012–75). Specifically, see note 3. 10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 9 See E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM 28JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Notices Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–2012–80. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–Phlx– 2012–80 and should be submitted on or before July 19, 2012. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–15808 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am] srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–67244; File No. SR– NYSEArca-2012–67] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca Rule 3.2 and NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. Rule 3.2, Which Concern the Nomination and Election of Fair Representation Directors June 22, 2012. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on June 18, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by NYSE Arca. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Rule 3.2 and NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’) Rule 3.2, which concern the nomination and election of fair representation directors. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. 1 15 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:35 Jun 27, 2012 2 17 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. Frm 00133 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38701 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Rule 3.2 and NYSE Arca Equities Rule 3.2, which concern the nomination and election of fair representation directors. Background Section 6(b)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), requires that the rules of an exchange shall ‘‘assure a fair representation of its members in the selection of its directors and administration of its affairs and provide that one or more directors shall be representative of issuers and investors and not be associated with a member of the exchange, broker, or dealer.’’ 3 Exchange members who serve on exchange boards thus are sometimes referred to as ‘‘fair representation directors.’’ NYSE Arca Rule 3.2 sets forth a process for the nomination and selection of fair representation directors for the NYSE Arca Board of Directors (‘‘NYSE Arca Board’’), and NYSE Arca Equities Rule 3.2 sets forth a similar process for the nomination and selection of fair representation directors for the NYSE Arca Equities Board of Directors (‘‘Equities Board’’).4 The Exchange proposes to amend both rules to streamline those processes and make them more similar to the processes used by the New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) 5 and NYSE MKT LLC (‘‘NYSE MKT’’).6 Amendments to NYSE Arca Rules Under Section 3.02(a) of the NYSE Arca Bylaws, the NYSE Arca Board must have 8–12 Directors, and at least 3 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(3). Arca Equities is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NYSE Arca. 5 See Section 2.03(a) of the Third Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE Operating Agreement’’), available at https://usequities.nyx.com/sites/ corporate.nyx.com/files/thirdamendedandrestated operatingagreementofnewyorkstockexchangellc.pdf [sic]; Article III, Sections 1(C) and 5 of the Amended and Restated Bylaws of NYSE Market, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Market Bylaws’’), available at https:// usequities.nyx.com/sites/usequities.nyx.com/files/ final_second_amended_and_restated_bylaws_of_ nyse_market_inc_0.pdf and Article III, Sections 1(C) and 5 of the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of NYSE Regulation, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Regulation Bylaws’’), available at https://www.nyse.com/pdfs/ SecondAmendedandRestatedBylawsofNYSE RegulationInc.PDF. 6 See Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of NYSE MKT LLC (‘‘NYSE MKT Operating Agreement’’), Section 2.03(a) and (h), available at https://nyseamexrules.nyse.com/AMEX/ pdf/operating_agreement.pdf. 4 NYSE E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM 28JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38699-38701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67245; File No. SR-Phlx-2012-80]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to 
Technical and Conforming Amendments to the Pricing Schedule

June 22, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given 
that, on June 14, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC

[[Page 38700]]

(``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as 
described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared 
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to make various technical amendments to the 
Pricing Schedule to format pricing the same throughout the Pricing 
Schedule, correct a reference to Section IV fees and add the term 
``Specialist'' to Section V.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at 
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to make clarifying amendments to the Pricing 
Schedule. The Exchange proposes to amend Section II entitled ``Multiply 
Listed Options'' to reformat the rebates and fees from the current 
format, ``$.xx,'' to the format utilized in Section I, ``$0.xx,'' to 
conform the pricing format throughout the Pricing Schedule.
    The Exchange also proposes to amend Section IV, A entitled ``PIXL 
Pricing'' to correct a reference which was inadvertently not amended in 
a prior filing to refer to Section II fees as ``Multiply Listed 
Options.'' The Exchange recently amended the title of Section II from 
``Equity Options Fees'' to ``Multiply Listed Options Fees.'' \3\ 
Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend Section V entitled ``Routing 
Fees'' to add the term ``Specialist'' to the category ``Firm/Broker 
Dealer/Market Maker.'' The Exchange recently amended the Pricing 
Schedule to redefine its market participant categories and separate the 
Specialist category from that of Market Maker.\4\ At that time, the 
Exchange also filed SR-Phlx-2012-75, a filing pertaining to Routing 
Fees, and noted in that filing that for the purposes of Routing Fees, a 
Market Maker includes Specialists.\5\ At this time the Exchange 
proposes to indicate that a Specialist shall be as defined in the 
Pricing Schedule and add the Specialist category to the Routing Fees. 
The Exchange believes that using the defined terms for purposes of the 
Routing Fees will provide more clarity to the Pricing Schedule and 
therefore proposes to add the term Specialist to the fees instead of 
utilizing the term Market Maker to define a Specialist solely for the 
Routing Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67189 (June 12, 
2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-77).
    \4\ Id.
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67123 (June 5, 
2012), 77 FR 35092 (June 12, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-75). Specifically, 
see note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing 
Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \7\ in 
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees 
and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its 
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's amendments to Section II are reasonable, equitable 
and not unfairly discriminatory because the amendments are not 
substantive in nature, but merely conform the manner in which the 
pricing is displayed so that the format is similar throughout the 
Pricing Schedule.
    The Exchange's amendment to Section IV is reasonable, equitable and 
not unfairly discriminatory because this amendment clarifies the 
Pricing Schedule by correcting a reference that was inadvertently 
omitted in a prior filing to refer to Section II fees.
    The Exchange's amendment to Section V is reasonable, equitable and 
not unfairly discriminatory because it also clarifies the Pricing 
Schedule by reverting to the terms as defined in the Preface. Today, a 
Specialist is defined in the Pricing Schedule as a separately defined 
market participant apart from a Market Maker,\8\ although the Exchange 
noted in a separate filing that for purposes of Routing Fees a Market 
Maker includes a Specialist.\9\ The Exchange now proposes to utilize 
the definition of Specialist, as defined in the Preface of the Pricing 
Schedule, for consistency. The Routing Fees which are applicable to a 
Specialist will remain the same.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See SR-Phlx-2012-77.
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67123 (June 5, 
2012), 77 FR 35092 (June 12, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-75). Specifically, 
see note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the 
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may 
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission 
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, 
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-Phlx-2012-80 on the subject line.

[[Page 38701]]

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-80. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-80 and should be 
submitted on or before July 19, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-15808 Filed 6-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.