Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Market Maker Peg Order Available to Exchange Market Makers, 37086-37089 [2012-15055]
Download as PDF
37086
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2012 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act.27 At
any time within 60 days of the filing of
such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Exchange Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange
Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2012–49 and should be submitted on or
before July 11, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.28
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–15054 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISE–2012–49 on the subject
line.
[Release No. 34–67203; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2012–066]
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2012–49. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
June 14, 2012.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
Adopt a New Market Maker Peg Order
Available to Exchange Market Makers
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 6,
2012, the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘NASDAQ’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
28 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
27 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jun 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt a
new Market Maker Peg Order to provide
similar functionality as the automated
functionality provided to market makers
under Rules 4613(a)(2)(F) and (G).
The text of the proposed rule change
is below. Proposed new language is in
italics; proposed deletions are in
brackets.
*
*
*
*
*
4751. Definitions
The following definitions apply to the
Rule 4600 and 4750 Series for the
trading of securities listed on Nasdaq or
a national securities exchange other
than Nasdaq.
(a)–(e) No change.
(f) The term ‘‘Order Type’’ shall mean
the unique processing prescribed for
designated orders that are eligible for
entry into the System, and shall include:
(1)–(14) No change.
(15) ‘‘Market Maker Peg Order’’ is a
limit order that, upon entry, the bid or
offer is automatically priced by the
System at the Designated Percentage
away from the then current National
Best Bid and National Best Offer, or if
no National Best Bid or National Best
Offer, at the Designated Percentage
away from the last reported sale from
the responsible single plan processor in
order to comply with the quotation
requirements for Market Makers set
forth in Rule 4613(a)(2). Upon reaching
the Defined Limit, the price of a Market
Maker Peg Order bid or offer will be
adjusted by the System to the
Designated Percentage away from the
then current National Best Bid and
National Best Offer, or, if no National
Best Bid or National Best Offer, to the
Designated Percentage away from the
last reported sale from the responsible
single plan processor. If a Market Maker
Peg Order bid or offer moves a specified
number of percentage points away from
the Designated Percentage towards the
then current National Best Bid or
National Best Offer, as described in Rule
4613(a)(2)(F) (Quotation Creation and
Adjustment), the price of such bid or
offer will be adjusted to the Designated
Percentage away from the then current
National Best Bid and National Best
Offer, or if no National Best Bid or
National Best Offer, to the Designated
Percentage away from the last reported
sale from the responsible single plan
processor. In the absence of a National
Best Bid or National Best Offer and if no
last reported sale, the order will be
cancelled or rejected. Market Maker Peg
Orders are not eligible for routing
pursuant to Rule 4758 and are always
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2012 / Notices
displayed on NASDAQ.
Notwithstanding the availability of
Market Maker Peg Order functionality, a
Market Maker remains responsible for
entering, monitoring, and re-submitting,
as applicable, quotations that meet the
requirements of Rule 4613. A new
timestamp is created for the order each
time that it is automatically adjusted.
For purposes of this paragraph,
NASDAQ will apply the Designated
Percentage and Defined Limit as set
forth in Rule 4613, subject to the
following exception. Nothing in this rule
shall preclude a Market Maker from
designating a more aggressive offset
from the National Best Bid or National
Best Offer than the given Designated
Percentage for any individual Market
Maker Peg Order. If a Market Maker
designates a more aggressive offset from
the National Best Bid or National Best
Offer, the price of a Market Maker Peg
Order bid or offer will be adjusted by the
System to maintain the Market Makerdesignated offset from the National Best
Bid or National Best Offer, or if no
National Best Bid or National Best Offer,
the order will be cancelled or rejected.
(g)–(i) No change.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
NASDAQ is proposing to adopt a new
Market Maker Peg Order to provide
similar functionality presently available
to Exchange market makers under Rules
4613(a)(2)(F) and (G). NASDAQ will
continue to offer the present automated
quote management functionality
provided to market makers under Rules
4613(a)(2)(F) and (G) for a period of 3
months after the implementation of the
proposed Market Maker Peg Order. The
purpose of this transition period, during
which both the present automated quote
management functionality under Rules
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jun 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
4163(a)(2)(F) and (G) and the Market
Maker Peg Order will operate
concurrently, is to afford market makers
with the opportunity to adequately test
the new Market Maker Peg Order and
migrate away from the present
automated quote management
functionality under Rules 4613(a)(2)(F)
and (G). Prior to the end of this 3 month
period, NASDAQ will submit a rule
filing to retire the automated quote
management functionality under Rules
4613(a)(2)(F) and (G).
NASDAQ adopted Rules 4613(a)(2)(F)
and (G) as part of an effort to address
issues uncovered by the aberrant trading
that occurred on May 6, 2010.3 The
automated quote management
functionality (‘‘AQ’’) offered by these
rules is designed to help Exchange
market makers meet the enhanced
market maker obligations adopted post
May 6, 2010,4 and avoid execution of
market maker ‘‘stub quotes’’ in instances
of aberrant trading.5 As part of these
enhanced obligations, NASDAQ
requires market makers for each stock in
which they are registered to
continuously maintain a two-sided
quotation within a designated
percentage of the National Best Bid and
National Best Offer,6 as appropriate.
Although AQ has been successful in
allowing Exchange market makers to
meet their enhanced obligations and in
avoiding the deleterious effect on the
markets caused by ‘‘stub quote’’
executions, AQ presents difficulties to
market makers in meeting their
obligations under Rule 15c3–5 under
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63255
(November 5, 2010), 75 FR 69484 (November 12,
2010) (SR–NASDAQ–2010–115, et al.).
4 Id.
5 For each issue in which a market maker is
registered, AQ automatically creates a quotation for
display to comply with market making obligations.
Compliant displayed quotations are thereafter
allowed to rest and are not further adjusted unless
the relationship between the quotation and its
related national best bid or national best offer, as
appropriate, shrinks to the greater of: (a) 4
percentage points, or, (b) one-quarter the applicable
percentage necessary to trigger an individual stock
trading pause as described in Rule 4120(a)(11), or
expands to within that same percentage less 0.5%,
whereupon AQ will immediately re-adjust and
display the market maker’s quote to the appropriate
designated percentage. Quotations originally
entered by market makers are allowed to move
freely towards the national best bid or national best
offer, as appropriate, for potential execution. In the
event of an execution against a System (as defined
in Rule 4751(a)) created compliant quotation, the
market maker’s quote is refreshed by AQ on the
executed side of the market at the applicable
designated percentage away from the then national
best bid (offer), or if no national best bid (offer), the
last reported sale. Rule 4613(F) & (G).
6 As defined by Regulation NMS Rule 600(b)(42).
17 CFR 242.600.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37087
the Act (the ‘‘Market Access Rule’’) 7
and Regulation SHO.8
The Market Access Rule requires a
broker-dealer with market access, or that
provides a customer or any other person
with access to an exchange or
alternative trading system through use
of its market participant identifier or
otherwise, to establish, document, and
maintain a system of risk management
controls and supervisory procedures
reasonably designed to manage the
financial, regulatory, and other risks of
this business activity. These controls
must be reasonably designed to ensure
compliance with all regulatory
requirements, which are defined as ‘‘all
federal securities laws, rules and
regulations, and rules of self-regulatory
organizations, that are applicable in
connection with market access.’’ 9
In addition to the obligations of the
Market Access Rule, broker-dealers have
independent obligations that arise under
Regulation SHO. Regulation SHO
obligations generally include properly
marking sell orders, obtaining a ‘‘locate’’
for short sale orders, closing out fail to
deliver positions, and, where
applicable, complying with the short
sale price test.10 While there are certain
exceptions to some of the requirements
of Regulation SHO where a market
maker is engaged in bona-fide market
making activities,11 the availability of
7 17
CFR 240.15c3–5.
CFR 242.200 through 204.
9 17 CFR 240.15c3–5.
10 Supra note 9.
11 See 17 CFR 242.203(b)(1). The Commission
adopted a narrow exception to Regulation SHO’s
‘‘locate’’ requirement for market makers that may
need to facilitate customer orders in a fast moving
market without possible delays associated with
complying with such requirement. Only market
makers engaged in bona fide market making in the
security at the time they effect the short sale are
excepted from the ‘‘locate’’ requirement. See
Exchange Act Release No. 50103 (July 28, 2004), 69
FR 48008, 48015 (August 6, 2004) (providing
guidance as to what does not constitutes bona-fide
market making for purposes of claiming the
exception to Regulation SHO’s ‘‘locate’’
requirement). See also Exchange Act Release No.
58775 (October 14, 2008), 73 FR 61690, 61698–9
(October 17, 2008) (providing guidance regarding
what is bona-fide market making for purposes of
complying with the market maker exception to
Regulation SHO’s ‘‘locate’’ requirement including
without limitation whether the market maker incurs
any economic or market risk with respect to the
securities, continuous quotations that are at or near
the market on both sides and that are
communicated and represented in a way that makes
them widely accessible to investors and other
broker-dealers and a pattern of trading that includes
both purchases and sales in roughly comparable
amounts to provide liquidity to customers or other
broker-dealers). Thus, market makers would not be
able to rely solely on quotations priced in
accordance with the Designated Percentages under
proposed Rule 4751(f)(15) or the AQ functionality
under Rules 4163(a)(2)(F) and (G) for eligibility for
the bona-fide market making exception to the
8 17
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
Continued
20JNN1
37088
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2012 / Notices
those exceptions is distinct and
independent from whether a market
maker submits an order that is a Market
Maker Peg Order.
The current AQ functionality offered
to market makers reprices and
‘‘refreshes’’ a market maker’s quote
when it is executed against, without any
action required by the market maker.
When a market maker’s quote is
refreshed by the Exchange, however, the
market maker has an obligation to
ensure that the requirements of the
Market Access Rule and Regulation
SHO are met. To meet these obligations,
a market maker must actively monitor
the status of its quotes and ensure that
the requirements of the Market Access
Rule and Regulation SHO are being
satisfied.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Market Maker Peg Order
In an effort to simplify market maker
compliance with the requirements of the
Market Access Rule and Regulation
SHO, NASDAQ is proposing to adopt a
new order type available only to
Exchange market makers, which offers
AQ-like functionality but also allows a
market maker to comply with the
requirements of the Market Access Rule
and Regulation SHO. Specifically,
NASDAQ is proposing to replace AQ
functionality with the Market Maker Peg
Order. The Market Maker Peg Order
would be a one-sided limit order and
similar to other peg orders available to
market participants in that the order is
tied or ‘‘pegged’’ to a certain price,12 but
it would not be eligible for routing
pursuant Rule 4758 and would always
be displayed and attributable (as
defined in Rule 4751). The Market
Maker Peg Order would be limited to
market makers and would have its price
automatically set and adjusted, both
upon entry and any time thereafter, in
order to comply with the Exchange’s
rules regarding market maker quotation
requirements and obligations.13 It is
expected that market makers will
perform the necessary checks to comply
with Regulation SHO, as discussed
above, prior to entry of a Market Maker
Peg Order. Upon entry and at any time
the order exceeds either the Defined
Limit, as described in Rule
‘‘locate’’ requirement based on the criteria set forth
by the Commission. It should also be noted that a
determination of bona-fide market making is
relevant for the purposes of a broker-dealers closeout obligations under Rule 204 of Regulation SHO.
See 17 CFR 242.204(a)(3).
12 Rule 4751(f)(4) defines Pegged Orders.
13 The Market Maker Peg Order is one-sided so a
market maker seeking to use Market Maker Peg
Orders to comply with the Exchange’s rules
regarding market maker quotation requirements
would need to submit both a bid and an offer using
the order type.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jun 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
4613(a)(2)(E), or moves a specified
number of percentage points away from
the Designated Percentage towards the
then current National Best Bid or
National Best Offer, as described in Rule
4613(a)(2)(F), the Market Maker Peg
Order would be priced by the Exchange
at the Designated Percentage 14 away
from the then current National Best Bid
and National Best Offer, or, if no
National Best Bid or National Best Offer,
to the Designated Percentage away from
the last reported sale from the
responsible single plan processor. In the
absence of a National Best Bid or
National Best Offer and last reported
sale, the order will be cancelled or
rejected. Adjustment to the Designated
Percentage is designed to avoid an
execution against a Market Maker Peg
Order that would initiate a single stock
circuit breaker. In the event of an
execution against a Market Maker Peg
Order that reduces the size of the
Market Maker Peg Order below one
round lot, the market maker would need
to enter a new order, after performing
the regulatory checks discussed above,
to satisfy their obligations under Rule
4613.15 In the event that pricing the
Market Maker Peg Order at the
Designated Percentage away from the
then current National Best Bid and
National Best Offer, or, if no National
Best Bid or National Best Offer, to the
Designated Percentage away from the
last reported sale from the responsible
single plan processor would result in
the order exceeding its limit price, the
order will be cancelled or rejected.
NASDAQ is also proposing to allow a
market maker to designate an offset
more aggressive (i.e., smaller) than the
Designated Percentage for any given
Market Maker Peg Order. This
functionality will allow a market maker
to quote at price levels that are closer to
the National Best Bid and National Best
Offer if it elects to do so. To use this
functionality, a market maker must
designate the desired offset upon order
entry.16 Thereafter and unlike the
default 17 Market Maker Peg Order, a
14 The Designated Percentage is the individual
stock pause trigger percentage under Rule
4120(a)(11) (or comparable rule of another
exchange) less two (2) percentage points. See Rule
4613(a)(2)(D).
15 Rule 4613 generally sets forth NASDAQ market
maker requirements, which include quotation and
pricing obligations, and the firm quote obligation.
16 If a market maker wishes, it can designate a
more aggressive bid while using the Defined
Percentage and Defined Limit for its offer, or vice
versa.
17 In the absence of an offset designation, a
Market Maker Peg Order will default to using the
Defined Percentage and Defined Limit, and the
repricing process whereby, upon reaching the
Defined Limit, the price of a Market Maker Peg
Order bid or offer will be adjusted by the System
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Market Maker Peg Order with a market
maker-designated offset will have its
price automatically adjusted on a tickby-tick basis by the System to maintain
the market maker-designated offset from
the National Best Bid or National Best
Offer until the order is executed or
cancelled.18 In the absence of a National
Best Bid or National Best Offer, Market
Maker Peg Orders with a market makerdesignated offset will be cancelled or
rejected. In the event that pricing the
Market Maker Peg Order at the market
maker-designated offset away from the
then current National Best Bid and
National Best Offer would result in the
order exceeding its limit price, the order
will be cancelled or rejected.
The Market Maker Peg Order will be
accepted and executable during System
hours. During pre- and post-market
hours, the wider Designated Percentage
and Defined Limit associated with the
9:30 a.m.–9:45 a.m. and 3:35 p.m.–4:00
p.m. periods under Rule 4613(a)(2)(D)
and (E) will be applied.
NASDAQ believes that this orderbased approach is superior in terms of
the ease in complying with the
requirements of the Market Access Rule
and Regulation SHO while also
providing similar quote adjusting
functionality to its market makers.
Market makers would have control of
order origination, as required by the
Market Access Rule, while also allowing
market makers to make marking and
locate determinations prior to order
entry, as required by Regulation SHO.
As such, market makers are fully able to
comply with the requirements of the
Market Access Rule and Regulation
SHO, as they would when placing any
order, while also meeting their
Exchange market making obligations. In
this regard, the Market Maker Peg Order,
like the current AQ system, does not
ensure that the market maker is
satisfying the requirements of
Regulation SHO, including the
satisfaction of the locate requirement of
Rule 203(b)(1) or an exception thereto.
to the Designated Percentage away from the then
current National Best Bid or National Best Offer, or,
if no National Best Bid or National Best Offer, to
the Designated Percentage away from the last
reported sale from the responsible single plan
processor.
18 Market Maker Peg Orders with a market makerdesignated offset may be able to qualify as bona-fide
market making for purposes of Regulation SHO,
depending on the facts and circumstances. A
market maker entering such an order must consider
the factors set forth by the Commission in
determining whether reliance on the exception from
the ‘‘locate’’ requirement of Rule 203 for bona-fide
market making is appropriate with respect to the
particular Market Maker Peg Order and its
designated offset. See supra note 12.
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2012 / Notices
2. Statutory Basis
IV. Solicitation of Comments
The statutory basis for the proposed
rule change is Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,19 which requires the rules of an
exchange to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The proposed rule
change also is designed to support the
principles of Section 11A(a)(1) 20 of the
Act in that it seeks to assure fair
competition among brokers and dealers
and among exchange markets. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule meets these requirements in that it
promotes transparency and uniformity
across markets concerning minimum
market maker quotation requirements
and member obligations to comply with
the regulatory requirements of the
Market Access Rule and Regulation
SHO. The Exchange also believes that
providing Exchange market makers with
a transition period, during which they
may adequately test the new
functionality, will serve to minimize the
potential market impact caused by the
implementation of the order type.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
shall:
A. By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change; or
B. Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
19 15
20 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:50 Jun 19, 2012
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–15055 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2012–066 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2012–066. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2012–066 and should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2012.
Revocation of License of Small
Business Investment Company
Pursuant to the authority granted to
the United States Small Business
Administration by the Wind-Up Order
of the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa, Cedar
Rapids Division, entered September 19,
2011, the United States Small Business
Administration hereby revokes the
license of Berthel SBIC, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, to function as
a small business investment company
under the Small Business Investment
Company License No. 07070100 issued
to Berthel SBIC, LLC, on May 4, 1998
and said license is hereby declared null
and void as of September 19, 2011.
United States Small Business
Administration.
Dated: June 4, 2012.
Sean J. Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2012–14837 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA–2012–0036]
Notice of Meeting of the Occupational
Information Development Advisory
Panel
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Social Security Administration
(SSA).
Notice of upcoming panel
teleconference meeting and Request for
Comment.
ACTION:
The Occupational
Information Development Advisory
Panel (Panel) is a discretionary Panel,
established under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972, as amended.
The Panel provides independent advice
and recommendations to us on the
creation of an occupational information
system for use in our disability
programs and for our adjudicative
needs.
SUMMARY:
21 17
Jkt 226001
37089
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
20JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37086-37089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15055]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-67203; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2012-066]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Market Maker
Peg Order Available to Exchange Market Makers
June 14, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 6, 2012, the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt a new Market Maker Peg Order to
provide similar functionality as the automated functionality provided
to market makers under Rules 4613(a)(2)(F) and (G).
The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new
language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets.
* * * * *
4751. Definitions
The following definitions apply to the Rule 4600 and 4750 Series
for the trading of securities listed on Nasdaq or a national securities
exchange other than Nasdaq.
(a)-(e) No change.
(f) The term ``Order Type'' shall mean the unique processing
prescribed for designated orders that are eligible for entry into the
System, and shall include:
(1)-(14) No change.
(15) ``Market Maker Peg Order'' is a limit order that, upon entry,
the bid or offer is automatically priced by the System at the
Designated Percentage away from the then current National Best Bid and
National Best Offer, or if no National Best Bid or National Best Offer,
at the Designated Percentage away from the last reported sale from the
responsible single plan processor in order to comply with the quotation
requirements for Market Makers set forth in Rule 4613(a)(2). Upon
reaching the Defined Limit, the price of a Market Maker Peg Order bid
or offer will be adjusted by the System to the Designated Percentage
away from the then current National Best Bid and National Best Offer,
or, if no National Best Bid or National Best Offer, to the Designated
Percentage away from the last reported sale from the responsible single
plan processor. If a Market Maker Peg Order bid or offer moves a
specified number of percentage points away from the Designated
Percentage towards the then current National Best Bid or National Best
Offer, as described in Rule 4613(a)(2)(F) (Quotation Creation and
Adjustment), the price of such bid or offer will be adjusted to the
Designated Percentage away from the then current National Best Bid and
National Best Offer, or if no National Best Bid or National Best Offer,
to the Designated Percentage away from the last reported sale from the
responsible single plan processor. In the absence of a National Best
Bid or National Best Offer and if no last reported sale, the order will
be cancelled or rejected. Market Maker Peg Orders are not eligible for
routing pursuant to Rule 4758 and are always
[[Page 37087]]
displayed on NASDAQ. Notwithstanding the availability of Market Maker
Peg Order functionality, a Market Maker remains responsible for
entering, monitoring, and re-submitting, as applicable, quotations that
meet the requirements of Rule 4613. A new timestamp is created for the
order each time that it is automatically adjusted. For purposes of this
paragraph, NASDAQ will apply the Designated Percentage and Defined
Limit as set forth in Rule 4613, subject to the following exception.
Nothing in this rule shall preclude a Market Maker from designating a
more aggressive offset from the National Best Bid or National Best
Offer than the given Designated Percentage for any individual Market
Maker Peg Order. If a Market Maker designates a more aggressive offset
from the National Best Bid or National Best Offer, the price of a
Market Maker Peg Order bid or offer will be adjusted by the System to
maintain the Market Maker-designated offset from the National Best Bid
or National Best Offer, or if no National Best Bid or National Best
Offer, the order will be cancelled or rejected.
(g)-(i) No change.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
NASDAQ is proposing to adopt a new Market Maker Peg Order to
provide similar functionality presently available to Exchange market
makers under Rules 4613(a)(2)(F) and (G). NASDAQ will continue to offer
the present automated quote management functionality provided to market
makers under Rules 4613(a)(2)(F) and (G) for a period of 3 months after
the implementation of the proposed Market Maker Peg Order. The purpose
of this transition period, during which both the present automated
quote management functionality under Rules 4163(a)(2)(F) and (G) and
the Market Maker Peg Order will operate concurrently, is to afford
market makers with the opportunity to adequately test the new Market
Maker Peg Order and migrate away from the present automated quote
management functionality under Rules 4613(a)(2)(F) and (G). Prior to
the end of this 3 month period, NASDAQ will submit a rule filing to
retire the automated quote management functionality under Rules
4613(a)(2)(F) and (G).
NASDAQ adopted Rules 4613(a)(2)(F) and (G) as part of an effort to
address issues uncovered by the aberrant trading that occurred on May
6, 2010.\3\ The automated quote management functionality (``AQ'')
offered by these rules is designed to help Exchange market makers meet
the enhanced market maker obligations adopted post May 6, 2010,\4\ and
avoid execution of market maker ``stub quotes'' in instances of
aberrant trading.\5\ As part of these enhanced obligations, NASDAQ
requires market makers for each stock in which they are registered to
continuously maintain a two-sided quotation within a designated
percentage of the National Best Bid and National Best Offer,\6\ as
appropriate. Although AQ has been successful in allowing Exchange
market makers to meet their enhanced obligations and in avoiding the
deleterious effect on the markets caused by ``stub quote'' executions,
AQ presents difficulties to market makers in meeting their obligations
under Rule 15c3-5 under the Act (the ``Market Access Rule'') \7\ and
Regulation SHO.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63255 (November 5,
2010), 75 FR 69484 (November 12, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-2010-115, et al.).
\4\ Id.
\5\ For each issue in which a market maker is registered, AQ
automatically creates a quotation for display to comply with market
making obligations. Compliant displayed quotations are thereafter
allowed to rest and are not further adjusted unless the relationship
between the quotation and its related national best bid or national
best offer, as appropriate, shrinks to the greater of: (a) 4
percentage points, or, (b) one-quarter the applicable percentage
necessary to trigger an individual stock trading pause as described
in Rule 4120(a)(11), or expands to within that same percentage less
0.5%, whereupon AQ will immediately re-adjust and display the market
maker's quote to the appropriate designated percentage. Quotations
originally entered by market makers are allowed to move freely
towards the national best bid or national best offer, as
appropriate, for potential execution. In the event of an execution
against a System (as defined in Rule 4751(a)) created compliant
quotation, the market maker's quote is refreshed by AQ on the
executed side of the market at the applicable designated percentage
away from the then national best bid (offer), or if no national best
bid (offer), the last reported sale. Rule 4613(F) & (G).
\6\ As defined by Regulation NMS Rule 600(b)(42). 17 CFR
242.600.
\7\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-5.
\8\ 17 CFR 242.200 through 204.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Market Access Rule requires a broker-dealer with market access,
or that provides a customer or any other person with access to an
exchange or alternative trading system through use of its market
participant identifier or otherwise, to establish, document, and
maintain a system of risk management controls and supervisory
procedures reasonably designed to manage the financial, regulatory, and
other risks of this business activity. These controls must be
reasonably designed to ensure compliance with all regulatory
requirements, which are defined as ``all federal securities laws, rules
and regulations, and rules of self-regulatory organizations, that are
applicable in connection with market access.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the obligations of the Market Access Rule, broker-
dealers have independent obligations that arise under Regulation SHO.
Regulation SHO obligations generally include properly marking sell
orders, obtaining a ``locate'' for short sale orders, closing out fail
to deliver positions, and, where applicable, complying with the short
sale price test.\10\ While there are certain exceptions to some of the
requirements of Regulation SHO where a market maker is engaged in bona-
fide market making activities,\11\ the availability of
[[Page 37088]]
those exceptions is distinct and independent from whether a market
maker submits an order that is a Market Maker Peg Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Supra note 9.
\11\ See 17 CFR 242.203(b)(1). The Commission adopted a narrow
exception to Regulation SHO's ``locate'' requirement for market
makers that may need to facilitate customer orders in a fast moving
market without possible delays associated with complying with such
requirement. Only market makers engaged in bona fide market making
in the security at the time they effect the short sale are excepted
from the ``locate'' requirement. See Exchange Act Release No. 50103
(July 28, 2004), 69 FR 48008, 48015 (August 6, 2004) (providing
guidance as to what does not constitutes bona-fide market making for
purposes of claiming the exception to Regulation SHO's ``locate''
requirement). See also Exchange Act Release No. 58775 (October 14,
2008), 73 FR 61690, 61698-9 (October 17, 2008) (providing guidance
regarding what is bona-fide market making for purposes of complying
with the market maker exception to Regulation SHO's ``locate''
requirement including without limitation whether the market maker
incurs any economic or market risk with respect to the securities,
continuous quotations that are at or near the market on both sides
and that are communicated and represented in a way that makes them
widely accessible to investors and other broker-dealers and a
pattern of trading that includes both purchases and sales in roughly
comparable amounts to provide liquidity to customers or other
broker-dealers). Thus, market makers would not be able to rely
solely on quotations priced in accordance with the Designated
Percentages under proposed Rule 4751(f)(15) or the AQ functionality
under Rules 4163(a)(2)(F) and (G) for eligibility for the bona-fide
market making exception to the ``locate'' requirement based on the
criteria set forth by the Commission. It should also be noted that a
determination of bona-fide market making is relevant for the
purposes of a broker-dealers close-out obligations under Rule 204 of
Regulation SHO. See 17 CFR 242.204(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current AQ functionality offered to market makers reprices and
``refreshes'' a market maker's quote when it is executed against,
without any action required by the market maker. When a market maker's
quote is refreshed by the Exchange, however, the market maker has an
obligation to ensure that the requirements of the Market Access Rule
and Regulation SHO are met. To meet these obligations, a market maker
must actively monitor the status of its quotes and ensure that the
requirements of the Market Access Rule and Regulation SHO are being
satisfied.
Market Maker Peg Order
In an effort to simplify market maker compliance with the
requirements of the Market Access Rule and Regulation SHO, NASDAQ is
proposing to adopt a new order type available only to Exchange market
makers, which offers AQ-like functionality but also allows a market
maker to comply with the requirements of the Market Access Rule and
Regulation SHO. Specifically, NASDAQ is proposing to replace AQ
functionality with the Market Maker Peg Order. The Market Maker Peg
Order would be a one-sided limit order and similar to other peg orders
available to market participants in that the order is tied or
``pegged'' to a certain price,\12\ but it would not be eligible for
routing pursuant Rule 4758 and would always be displayed and
attributable (as defined in Rule 4751). The Market Maker Peg Order
would be limited to market makers and would have its price
automatically set and adjusted, both upon entry and any time
thereafter, in order to comply with the Exchange's rules regarding
market maker quotation requirements and obligations.\13\ It is expected
that market makers will perform the necessary checks to comply with
Regulation SHO, as discussed above, prior to entry of a Market Maker
Peg Order. Upon entry and at any time the order exceeds either the
Defined Limit, as described in Rule 4613(a)(2)(E), or moves a specified
number of percentage points away from the Designated Percentage towards
the then current National Best Bid or National Best Offer, as described
in Rule 4613(a)(2)(F), the Market Maker Peg Order would be priced by
the Exchange at the Designated Percentage \14\ away from the then
current National Best Bid and National Best Offer, or, if no National
Best Bid or National Best Offer, to the Designated Percentage away from
the last reported sale from the responsible single plan processor. In
the absence of a National Best Bid or National Best Offer and last
reported sale, the order will be cancelled or rejected. Adjustment to
the Designated Percentage is designed to avoid an execution against a
Market Maker Peg Order that would initiate a single stock circuit
breaker. In the event of an execution against a Market Maker Peg Order
that reduces the size of the Market Maker Peg Order below one round
lot, the market maker would need to enter a new order, after performing
the regulatory checks discussed above, to satisfy their obligations
under Rule 4613.\15\ In the event that pricing the Market Maker Peg
Order at the Designated Percentage away from the then current National
Best Bid and National Best Offer, or, if no National Best Bid or
National Best Offer, to the Designated Percentage away from the last
reported sale from the responsible single plan processor would result
in the order exceeding its limit price, the order will be cancelled or
rejected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Rule 4751(f)(4) defines Pegged Orders.
\13\ The Market Maker Peg Order is one-sided so a market maker
seeking to use Market Maker Peg Orders to comply with the Exchange's
rules regarding market maker quotation requirements would need to
submit both a bid and an offer using the order type.
\14\ The Designated Percentage is the individual stock pause
trigger percentage under Rule 4120(a)(11) (or comparable rule of
another exchange) less two (2) percentage points. See Rule
4613(a)(2)(D).
\15\ Rule 4613 generally sets forth NASDAQ market maker
requirements, which include quotation and pricing obligations, and
the firm quote obligation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASDAQ is also proposing to allow a market maker to designate an
offset more aggressive (i.e., smaller) than the Designated Percentage
for any given Market Maker Peg Order. This functionality will allow a
market maker to quote at price levels that are closer to the National
Best Bid and National Best Offer if it elects to do so. To use this
functionality, a market maker must designate the desired offset upon
order entry.\16\ Thereafter and unlike the default \17\ Market Maker
Peg Order, a Market Maker Peg Order with a market maker-designated
offset will have its price automatically adjusted on a tick-by-tick
basis by the System to maintain the market maker-designated offset from
the National Best Bid or National Best Offer until the order is
executed or cancelled.\18\ In the absence of a National Best Bid or
National Best Offer, Market Maker Peg Orders with a market maker-
designated offset will be cancelled or rejected. In the event that
pricing the Market Maker Peg Order at the market maker-designated
offset away from the then current National Best Bid and National Best
Offer would result in the order exceeding its limit price, the order
will be cancelled or rejected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ If a market maker wishes, it can designate a more
aggressive bid while using the Defined Percentage and Defined Limit
for its offer, or vice versa.
\17\ In the absence of an offset designation, a Market Maker Peg
Order will default to using the Defined Percentage and Defined
Limit, and the repricing process whereby, upon reaching the Defined
Limit, the price of a Market Maker Peg Order bid or offer will be
adjusted by the System to the Designated Percentage away from the
then current National Best Bid or National Best Offer, or, if no
National Best Bid or National Best Offer, to the Designated
Percentage away from the last reported sale from the responsible
single plan processor.
\18\ Market Maker Peg Orders with a market maker-designated
offset may be able to qualify as bona-fide market making for
purposes of Regulation SHO, depending on the facts and
circumstances. A market maker entering such an order must consider
the factors set forth by the Commission in determining whether
reliance on the exception from the ``locate'' requirement of Rule
203 for bona-fide market making is appropriate with respect to the
particular Market Maker Peg Order and its designated offset. See
supra note 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Market Maker Peg Order will be accepted and executable during
System hours. During pre- and post-market hours, the wider Designated
Percentage and Defined Limit associated with the 9:30 a.m.-9:45 a.m.
and 3:35 p.m.-4:00 p.m. periods under Rule 4613(a)(2)(D) and (E) will
be applied.
NASDAQ believes that this order-based approach is superior in terms
of the ease in complying with the requirements of the Market Access
Rule and Regulation SHO while also providing similar quote adjusting
functionality to its market makers. Market makers would have control of
order origination, as required by the Market Access Rule, while also
allowing market makers to make marking and locate determinations prior
to order entry, as required by Regulation SHO. As such, market makers
are fully able to comply with the requirements of the Market Access
Rule and Regulation SHO, as they would when placing any order, while
also meeting their Exchange market making obligations. In this regard,
the Market Maker Peg Order, like the current AQ system, does not ensure
that the market maker is satisfying the requirements of Regulation SHO,
including the satisfaction of the locate requirement of Rule 203(b)(1)
or an exception thereto.
[[Page 37089]]
2. Statutory Basis
The statutory basis for the proposed rule change is Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,\19\ which requires the rules of an exchange to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The
proposed rule change also is designed to support the principles of
Section 11A(a)(1) \20\ of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair
competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. The
Exchange believes that the proposed rule meets these requirements in
that it promotes transparency and uniformity across markets concerning
minimum market maker quotation requirements and member obligations to
comply with the regulatory requirements of the Market Access Rule and
Regulation SHO. The Exchange also believes that providing Exchange
market makers with a transition period, during which they may
adequately test the new functionality, will serve to minimize the
potential market impact caused by the implementation of the order type.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission shall:
A. By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change; or
B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-NASDAQ-2012-066 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2012-066. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2012-066 and should
be submitted on or before July 11, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-15055 Filed 6-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P