Applications for New Awards: Technical Assistance and Dissemination To Improve Services and Results for Children With Disabilities; Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center, 36501-36510 [2012-14942]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
applications may be separated into two
or more groups and ranked and selected
for funding within the specific groups.
This procedure will make it easier for
the Department to find peer reviewers
by ensuring that greater numbers of
individuals who are eligible to serve as
reviewers for any particular group of
applicants will not have conflicts of
interest. It also will increase the quality,
independence, and fairness of the
review process, while permitting panel
members to review applications under
discretionary grant competitions for
which they also have submitted
applications. However, if the
Department decides to select an equal
number of applications in each group
for funding, this may result in different
cut-off points for fundable applications
in each group.
4. Special Conditions: Under 34 CFR
74.14 and 80.12, the Secretary may
impose special conditions on a grant if
the applicant or grantee is not
financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a
financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 34
CFR parts 74 or 80, as applicable; has
not fulfilled the conditions of a prior
grant; or is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multi-year award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: Under the
Government Performance and Results
Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Department has
established a set of performance
measures, including long-term
measures, that are designed to yield
information on various aspects of the
effectiveness and quality of the
Technical Assistance and Dissemination
to Improve Services and Results for
Children with Disabilities program.
These measures focus on the extent to
which projects provide high-quality
products and services, the relevance of
project products and services to
educational and early intervention
policy and practice, and the use of
products and services to improve
educational and early intervention
policy and practice.
Grantees will be required to report
information on their project’s
performance in annual reports to the
Department (34 CFR 75.590).
5. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award, the Secretary may
consider, under 34 CFR 75.253, the
extent to which a grantee has made
‘‘substantial progress toward meeting
the objectives in its approved
application.’’ This consideration
includes the review of a grantee’s
progress in meeting the targets and
projected outcomes in its approved
application, and whether the grantee
has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application
and budget. In making a continuation
grant, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in
compliance with the assurances in its
approved application, including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
Dr.
´
Grace Zamora Duran, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue
SW., room 4088, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2600.
Telephone: (202) 245–7328.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) by
contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD or a TTY, call
the FRS, toll free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: June 13, 2012.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2012–14940 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards:
Technical Assistance and
Dissemination To Improve Services
and Results for Children With
Disabilities; Early Childhood Technical
Assistance Center
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
AGENCY:
VII. Agency Contact
Sfmt 4703
36501
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
Notice.
19JNN1
36502
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
Overview Information Technical
Assistance and Dissemination To
Improve Services and Results for
Children With Disabilities—Early
Childhood Technical Assistance Center
Notice inviting applications for new
awards for fiscal year (FY) 2012.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.326P.
Applications Available: June 19,
2012.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: July 19, 2012.
DATES:
Full Text of Announcement
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Programs: The purpose of
the Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and
Results for Children with Disabilities
program is to promote academic
achievement and to improve results for
children with disabilities by providing
technical assistance (TA), supporting
model demonstration projects,
disseminating useful information, and
implementing activities that are
supported by scientifically based
research.
Priority: In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(v), this priority is from
allowable activities specified in the
statute or otherwise authorized in the
statute (see sections 663 and 681(d)of
the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. 1463
and 1481(d)).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2012 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is: Early Childhood
Technical Assistance Center.
Background: The Office of Special
Education Programs (OSEP) is
committed to ensuring that all infants,
toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities receive effective services in
natural environments and inclusive
settings that promote positive
developmental and learning outcomes.
Effective services depend on: (1) The
quality of early intervention programs
authorized under Part C of IDEA and
preschool programs authorized under
Part B of IDEA; (2) the coordination of
these programs with each other and
with other early childhood programs
that serve infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and
their families; and (3) the capacity of
early childhood programs to scale up
and sustain effective implementation
components to support the use of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
evidence-based interventions at the
local program level. OSEP has
supported the implementation of IDEA
Part C early intervention services and
Part B preschool services by funding
technical assistance (TA) centers that
have helped States strengthen their
State and local systems and build the
capacity of providers to improve
developmental and learning outcomes
for infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities and their
families. OSEP will further this work by
funding a cooperative agreement to
support the establishment and operation
of an Early Childhood Technical
Assistance Center (Center). The Center
will support States in administering
high-quality and effective IDEA Part C
early intervention and Part B preschool
programs through TA and
recommendations for practice.
In recent years, States have faced a
growing number of challenges as they
implement the IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool
programs. In addition to the economic
and fiscal challenges at the State and
local levels, States are seeing an
increase in the number of infants,
toddlers, and preschool children with
complex needs who are eligible for
services under IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool
programs (Part C State Performance Plan
(SPP)/Annual Performance Report
(APR) 2011 Indicator Analyses, FFY
2009–10; Part B SPP/APR 2011
Indicator Analyses, FFY 2009–10).
Moreover, given the complexity of and
interplay between these programs, many
States struggle with difficult systems
issues, such as: (1) Ensuring that all
children eligible for services under Part
C of IDEA are identified and evaluated
or screened; (2) maximizing all available
funding sources for IDEA Part C
services; (3) improving transition
services for children who are first
served under an IDEA Part C program
and then receive IDEA Part B preschool
services; (4) collecting valid and reliable
child and family outcome data under
IDEA Part C early intervention and Part
B preschool programs to inform program
improvement; and (5) coordinating with
other early childhood programs (Infant
and Toddler Coordinators Association
Tipping Points Survey, 2011; Part C
SPP/APR 2011 Indicator Analyses, FFY
2009–10; Part B SPP/APR 2011
Indicator Analyses, FFY 2009–10).
To meet the challenges of
implementing IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool
programs, program administrators must
understand the elements that are
necessary to implement high-quality
early intervention and preschool
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
programs effectively and efficiently.
Ensuring that Part C early intervention
and Part B preschool programs are
coordinating with other early childhood
programs in a State is one such element
that could increase a program’s
effectiveness and efficiency. However,
developing a coordinated and integrated
early childhood system within a State is
a significant challenge because there are
multiple early childhood programs (e.g.,
IDEA Part C early intervention; IDEA
Part B preschool; Head Start; Early Head
Start; child care; State-funded Pre-K
programs) administered by different
agencies with different policies,
procedures, and funding streams, and
infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities are often
served by more than one of these
programs at a time. Overcoming this
overarching challenge to provide a
coordinated and integrated early
childhood system is critical to ensuring
that infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities and their
families receive high-quality services
from the array of early childhood
programs that are available to serve
them. As States continue to work
towards designing and implementing a
coordinated and integrated system of
early childhood programs and services
through such initiatives as the Race To
the Top—Early Learning Challenge
(RTT–ELC), it is critical that support be
provided to the IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool
programs to assist them in aligning
resources and policies across multiple
levels (e.g., State, regional, local) of the
early childhood service system. Such
support would help these programs
reduce inefficiencies across early
childhood programs, and improve the
quality of services for infants, toddlers,
and preschool children with disabilities
and their families.
A challenge at the local program level
is the lack of adequately trained
personnel who can implement effective
services and evidence-based
interventions, suggesting that infants,
toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities may not be achieving the
learning and developmental outcomes
that are possible (Bruder, 2010; Odom,
2009). In surveys of State Part C and
Part B, Section 619 Coordinators,
respondents have expressed concern
that personnel who work with infants,
toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities and their families are not
adequately trained (Bruder, MogroWilson, Stayton, & Dietrich, 2009).
Furthermore, although the Division of
Early Childhood of the Council for
Exceptional Children’s (DEC)
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
recommended practices for personnel
working with infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and
their families is a valuable resource on
intervention practices used by the field,
that resource needs to be updated to
include current research on
implementing high-quality, coordinated,
and integrated early childhood systems;
effective services; and evidence-based
interventions.
IDEA Part C early intervention and
Part B, Section 619 program
administrators must ensure that their
programs and providers are delivering
effective services and evidence-based
interventions. To do so, States must
have ‘‘implementation components’’ in
place at the State and local levels to
support providers in using effective
services and evidence-based
interventions. ‘‘Implementation
components’’ are the organizational
supports that allow providers to develop
the competence needed to implement
effective services and evidence-based
interventions in the way they were
´
designed to be delivered (Fixsen, Blase,
Horner, & Sugai, 2009). Examples of
implementation components include
professional development and training,
ongoing consultation and coaching,
performance assessments, data systems
to support decision making,
administrative support to ensure
personnel have the resources and skills
they need to implement interventions,
and systems that align policies and
funding mechanisms across multiple
levels (e.g., State, regional, local)
(Fixsen et al., 2009). Once
implementation components are in
place and the system’s capacity to
implement effective services and
evidence-based interventions is
established, the State will be better
equipped to implement, scale up, and
sustain a range of effective services and
evidence-based interventions across
multiple programs (Fixsen et al., 2009).
Establishing high-quality, effective
and efficient IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool
programs that are coordinated and
integrated with other early childhood
programs and that have the capacity to
support providers in implementing
effective services and evidence-based
interventions for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and
their families, requires changes to a
State’s early childhood services system
at multiple levels. TA has been
identified as a strategy to facilitate these
´
changes (Blase, 2009). Recognizing the
complexity of systems change,
particularly with respect to a system as
complex as the system of services
through which early childhood services
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
are provided, intensive TA is needed at
the State level so that a State can
overcome challenges and support local
early childhood programs in delivering
evidence-based, high-quality, effective,
coordinated, and integrated services and
interventions to improve developmental
and learning outcomes for infants,
toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities and their families.
Priority: Under this priority, the
Department will fund a cooperative
agreement to establish and operate an
Early Childhood Technical Assistance
Center (Center) to support States in
administering IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool
programs. Specifically, the Center will
provide TA to States to assist them in:
(1) Implementing high-quality, effective,
and efficient IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool
programs; (2) coordinating the IDEA
Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool programs with one another as
well as with other early childhood
programs in the State; and (3)
implementing effective services and
evidence-based interventions in early
childhood programs that result in
positive developmental and learning
outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and
their families.
In addition, the Center will develop a
set of empirically supported
recommendations for practice on: (1)
Policies that promote a high-quality,
coordinated, and integrated system of
early childhood programs; and (2)
services and interventions that result in
positive developmental and learning
outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and
their families.
With additional funding in years two
through five, the Center will increase its
scope of work and assist States in
continued development and refinement
of the State’s child and family outcomes
measurement systems for the IDEA Part
C early intervention and Part B
preschool programs.
To be considered for funding under
this absolute priority, applicants must
meet the application requirements
contained in this priority. Any project
funded under this absolute priority also
must meet the programmatic and
administrative requirements specified in
the priority.
Application Requirements. An
applicant must include in its
application—
(a) A logic model that depicts, at a
minimum, the goals, activities, outputs,
and outcomes of the proposed project. A
logic model communicates how a
project will achieve its outcomes and
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36503
provides a framework for both the
formative and summative evaluations of
the project;
Note: The following Web sites provide
more information on logic models:
www.researchutilization.org/matrix/
logicmodel_resource3c.html and
www.tadnet.org/model_and_performance.
(b) A plan to implement the activities
described in the Project Activities
section of this priority;
(c) A plan, linked to the proposed
project’s logic model, for a formative
evaluation of the proposed project’s
activities. The plan must describe how
the formative evaluation will use clear
performance objectives to ensure
continuous improvement in the
operation of the proposed project,
including objective measures of progress
in implementing the project and
ensuring the quality of products and
services. This plan must include how
the Center will collect data on all
components of the Center activities;
(d) A budget for a summative
evaluation to be conducted by an
independent third party, who must be
approved by OSEP;
(e) A budget dedicating a minimum of
$300,000 in year one of the project to
cover the costs of carrying out the tasks
described in paragraph (d) of the
Knowledge Development Activities
section of this priority;
(f) A budget dedicating a minimum of
$900,000 annually to cover the costs of
carrying out tasks in paragraph (e) of the
Knowledge Development Activities
section of this priority and paragraphs
(a)(1)(i)(E), (a)(2)(vi), (a)(3)(iii), and (b)
in the Technical Assistance and
Dissemination Activities section of this
priority related to supporting the
implementation of effective services and
evidence-based interventions that result
in positive developmental and learning
outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and
their families;
(g) A budget for attendance at the
following:
(1) A two-day kick-off meeting to be
held in Washington, DC, after receipt of
the award, and an annual planning
meeting held in Washington, DC, with
the OSEP Project Officer during each
subsequent year of the project period.
Note: Within 30 days of receipt of the
award, a post-award teleconference must be
held between the OSEP Project Officer and
the grantee’s Project Director or other
authorized representative.
(2) A three-day Project Directors’
Conference in Washington, DC, during
each year of the project period.
(3) A two-day Leveraging Resources
conference in Washington, DC, during
each year of the project period.
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
36504
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
(4) A three-day Leadership
Conference in Washington, DC, during
each year of the project period.
(5) Two two-day trips annually to
attend Department briefings,
Department-sponsored conferences, and
other meetings, as requested by OSEP;
and
(h) A line item in the proposed budget
for an annual set-aside of five percent of
the grant amount to support emerging
needs that are consistent with the
proposed project’s activities, as those
needs are identified in consultation
with OSEP.
Note: With approval from the OSEP Project
Officer, the Center must reallocate any
remaining funds from this annual set-aside
no later than the end of the third quarter of
each budget period.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Project Activities. To meet the
requirements of this priority, the Center,
at a minimum, must conduct the
following activities:
Knowledge Development Activities
(a) In the first three months of the
project period, identify a minimum of
six States to partner with to develop a
framework 1 for high-quality, effective,
and efficient IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool
programs. Each partnering State must
have commitments from its IDEA Part C
early intervention and Part B preschool
programs to participate in the activities
of the Center. Factors for consideration
in selecting these States could include
the type of State lead agency designated
to implement IDEA Part C (e.g., health
or education); funding mechanisms (use
of private and public insurance, family
fees, or parent cost participation to pay
for IDEA Part C services, and State fund
contributions for IDEA Part C and Part
B preschool programs); interagency
collaboration agreements; eligibility
criteria for IDEA Part C (e.g., narrow
versus broad eligibility for IDEA
services for children with
developmental delays or at-risk children
or birth-mandate States); staffing of
programs (e.g., contracting versus hiring
staff); approach to services
(multidisciplinary, transdisciplinary,
etc.); recipient of an RTT–ELC grant;
and performance on APRs. The Center
must obtain approval from OSEP on the
final selection of partnering States.
(b) In the first two years of the project
period, partner with the States
identified in response to paragraph (a)
of this section to develop, implement,
and evaluate a framework for highquality, effective, and efficient IDEA
Part C early intervention and Part B
1 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘framework’’
means a guide for decision making.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
preschool programs. In developing this
framework, the Center must work with
its partner States to identify, describe,
and document the elements that make
up IDEA Part C and Part B preschool
programs and describe what must exist
within each element to create highquality, effective, and efficient
programs. These elements must include,
but are not limited to, the following:
Governance structure; funding
mechanism; interagency agreements and
coordination; service delivery model;
personnel standards and qualifications;
professional development system; TA
system; comprehensive data system;
accountability and outcome
measurement system; and evaluation
and program quality and improvement
system. The Center must implement an
iterative process for the development,
implementation, and evaluation of the
framework where parts of it are
developed, implemented, and evaluated
before the entire framework is
completed, ensuring that it is an
effective framework for the partner
States and other States to use.
(c) On an annual basis, compile and
analyze data on all States’ APRs and
updated SPPs for IDEA Part C indicators
and Part B indicators that relate to
preschool programs, provide an analysis
of States’ success in meeting compliance
and performance indicators, and use the
analysis as the basis for providing States
a continuum of TA.
(d) In year one of the project,
collaborate with the DEC to update the
current set of DEC recommended
practices related to: (1) Policies that
promote a high-quality, coordinated,
and integrated early childhood system
and provide a foundation necessary to
facilitate the use of recommended
practices by providers serving infants,
toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities and their families; and (2)
effective services and evidence-based
interventions that result in positive
developmental and learning outcomes
for infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities and their
families. The Center must work with the
Early Childhood Personnel Center (that
will be updating the DEC’s
recommended practices related to
professional development), if funded by
OSEP, to finalize the process to update
the recommended practices so that they
reflect current research. The
recommended practices must be made
available at no cost to consumers on the
Center’s Web site, as required under
paragraph (a)(1)(i) in the Technical
Assistance and Dissemination Activities
section of this priority.
(e) Identify, document, and describe
the implementation components needed
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to support the use and sustainability of
effective services and evidence-based
interventions in early childhood
programs that serve infants, toddlers,
and preschool children with disabilities
and their families, consistent with
paragraph (a)(3)(iii)(B) of the Technical
Assistance and Dissemination Activities
section of this priority.
Technical Assistance and
Dissemination Activities
(a) Provide a continuum of TA and
dissemination activities that improve
the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency
of early childhood programs that
support the use of effective services and
evidence-based interventions that result
in positive developmental and learning
outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and
their families. The continuum must
include the following:
(1) General TA to States, early
childhood programs, professional
development providers, faculty at
institutions of higher education (IHEs),
researchers, early childhood personnel,
families, and other relevant
stakeholders. At a minimum, the Center
must conduct the following activities:
(i) Develop and disseminate reports,
products, guidance, implementation
tools, and other materials at no cost to
the consumer on:
(A) Current recommendations for
practice related to—
(1) Policies that promote a highquality, coordinated, and integrated
early childhood system and provide a
foundation necessary for providers to
use the recommended practices to serve
infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities and their
families; and
(2) Effective services and evidencebased interventions that result in
positive developmental and learning
outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and
their families.
(B) The framework for high-quality,
effective, and efficient IDEA Part C and
Part B preschool programs.
(C) The analysis of all State data
collected for IDEA Part C indicators that
relate to early intervention programs
and Part B indicators that relate to
preschool programs.
(D) Collecting quality child and
family outcome data, and using child
and family outcome data for program
improvement.
(E) Critical features of the
implementation components needed to
support the use, scaling up, and
sustainability of effective services and
evidence-based interventions in early
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
childhood programs at the State and
local program levels.
(ii) Maintain a Web site that meets
government or industry-recognized
standards for accessibility and that links
to the Web site operated by the
Technical Assistance Coordination
Center (TACC).
(iii) In consultation with the OSEP
Project Officer, make selected reports,
documents, and other materials
available in both English and Spanish.
(2) Targeted TA to States and other
relevant stakeholders to improve their
capacity to implement high-quality,
effective, and efficient IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool
programs and to support the use of
effective services and evidence-based
interventions in early childhood
programs at the local level. At a
minimum, the Center must conduct the
following activities:
(i) Assist States in preparing for IDEA
Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool monitoring and
accountability activities related to
serving infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities and their
families and implementing the State’s
corrective action plan and improvement
activities as appropriate.
(ii) Assist States in meeting IDEA Part
C early intervention and Part B
preschool program indicator targets in
their SPPs when reporting data on their
APRs, including child and family
outcome data for program improvement;
and meeting new requirements in the
IDEA Part C regulations issued on
September 28, 2011 (76 FR 60140).
(iii) Plan and implement activities,
which could include webinars,
meetings, video conferences, and Web
sites to support States in the continued
development and refinement of a child
and family outcomes measurement
system, including using data for IDEA
Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool program improvement.
(iv) Assist States in their efforts to
better coordinate their early childhood
programs to ensure that infants,
toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities and their families receive
high-quality services and to scale up
and sustain effective implementation
components in early childhood
programs.
(v) Provide a forum for researchers,
professional development providers,
early childhood personnel, IHE faculty,
and other relevant stakeholders to
collaborate through learning
communities, communities of practice,
or other mechanisms to discuss
recommended practices related to highquality early childhood systems,
effective services, and evidenced-based
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
interventions in early childhood
programs and methods to support their
use.
(3) Intensive TA to States to improve
their capacity to implement highquality, effective, and efficient early
childhood programs that serve infants,
toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities and their families and scale
up and sustain effective implementation
components to support the use of
effective services and evidence-based
interventions in early childhood
programs at the local level. At a
minimum, the Center must conduct the
following activities:
(i) Provide TA to States on
implementing the framework for highquality, effective, and efficient IDEA
Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool programs developed under
paragraph (a) in the Knowledge
Development Activities section of this
priority in the first and second years of
the project period.
(ii) In years two through five of the
project period, provide TA to States on
implementing a high-quality child and
family outcomes measurement system
that takes into account the following
components: purpose of the outcomes
measurement system, data collection
and transmission, data analysis,
reporting, using data, evaluation, and
cross-system coordination. In carrying
out this activity, the Center must
collaborate with the Early Childhood
Data Center, if funded by OSEP, to
prevent duplication of effort.
(iii) Select a minimum of four States
to build their capacity to scale up and
sustain effective implementation
components to support the use of
effective services and evidence-based
interventions at the local early
childhood program level. The Center
must develop a plan and criteria for
selecting the States with which they
will work. Factors for selecting States
for consideration could include the
State’s early childhood priorities and
initiatives; the commitment of the
State’s multiple early childhood
programs to participate in the TA to
support the developmental and learning
outcomes of infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and
their families; the commitment of the
State’s IHEs, including community
colleges, to prepare preservice
personnel on the use of the evidencebased interventions that may be scaled
up within the State; the commitment of
the early intervention and communitybased early childhood programs in highneed communities and high-need local
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36505
educational agencies (LEAs) 2 to
participate in the TA; and the
demographic and geographic
characteristics of each State, including
the percentage of young children who
are high-need children with
disabilities.3 The Center must obtain
approval from OSEP on the final
selection of States. At a minimum, the
Center must conduct the following
activities with the selected States:
(A) Assist the selected States in
identifying effective services and
evidence-based interventions for
infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities and their
families that the States will implement
and scale up. Based on the interventions
and services identified, the Center must
support the implementation and scale
up of the interventions and services
through direct TA or by contracting
with experts in the field.
(B) Assist each selected State to
identify and establish a minimum of six
implementation sites in early childhood
programs at the local level to identify,
document, and describe implementation
components and their effectiveness. The
Center must develop criteria for
selecting the implementation sites.
These criteria must be designed to
ensure that the sites serve children from
diverse backgrounds in a variety of
settings, including early intervention
and community-based early childhood
programs in high-need LEAs.
(C) Assist each selected State in
developing, implementing, and
evaluating a plan to scale up and sustain
effective implementation components to
support the use of effective services and
evidence-based interventions across
local early childhood programs within
each State, including early intervention
and community-based early childhood
programs in high-need LEAs.
(b) Establish a national TA network of
a cadre of experts on implementation
that will support the Center to provide
TA to States and local early childhood
programs to strengthen their capacity to
scale up and sustain effective
implementation components.
2 For the purposes of this priority, the term ‘‘highneed local educational agency’’ means an LEA (a)
that serves not fewer than 10,000 children from
families with incomes below the poverty line; or (b)
for which not less than 20 percent of the children
served by the LEA are from families with incomes
below the poverty line.
3 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘high-need
children with disabilities’’ refers to children (ages
birth through 5) who are eligible for services under
IDEA, and who may be further disadvantaged and
at risk of educational failure because they: (1) Are
living in poverty, (2) are homeless, (3) are in foster
care, (4) are English learners, (5) are new
immigrants, or (6) are migrant.
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
36506
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Leadership and Coordination Activities
(a) Communicate and collaborate, on
an ongoing basis, with OSEP-funded TA
projects, including the TACC, the
Regional Resource Centers Program, and
early childhood-focused centers funded
by the Departments of Education and
Health and Human Services (HHS), as
appropriate. This collaboration could
include the joint development of
products, the coordination of TA
services, and the planning and carrying
out of TA meetings and events.
(b) Lead the Early Childhood
Technical Assistance Consortium
(ECTA).4 The following Web site
provides more information on ECTA:
www.ectaconsortium.org/.
(c) Work with other Federal and State
TA efforts to ensure that IDEA Part C
early intervention and Part B preschool
programs are considered in the
development of coordinated early
learning and development systems for
children ages birth through five and
their families. These efforts must
include—
(1) In States with RTT–ELC grants,
supporting the involvement of IDEA
Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool programs in planning and
implementing RTT–ELC grant activities;
and
(2) Supporting the participation of
IDEA Part C early intervention and Part
B, Section 619 Coordinators on State
Advisory Councils on Early Childhood
Education and Care.
(d) Work with other Federal and State
TA efforts to strengthen linkages
between IDEA Part C early intervention
and Part B preschool programs and birth
through 3rd grade initiatives.
(e) Consult with a group of persons,
including representatives from State and
local IDEA Part C early intervention and
Part B preschool programs; State level
administrators from other early child
systems (e.g., State Child Care
Administrators and Head Start
Collaboration Directors); early
childhood personnel; parents of infants,
toddlers, or preschool children with
disabilities; representatives from other
OSEP-funded TA projects;
representatives from HHS-funded TA
4 The ECTA Consortium includes national
projects that are funded by the Departments of
Education and Health and Human Services that
provide TA in support of States’ efforts in building
coordinated early learning and development
systems. The purpose of the consortium is to:
coordinate early childhood TA efforts that support
States in building and sustaining their systems for
early learning and development; share knowledge
and resources for improving the delivery and
impact of TA; identify strategies for working
collaboratively; enhance each other’s TA efforts;
and explore options to leverage resources to benefit
respective constituencies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
projects; faculty in personnel
preparation; and researchers, as
appropriate, on the activities and
outcomes of the Center and solicit
programmatic support and advice from
various participants in the group, as
appropriate. The Center may convene
meetings, whether in person, by phone
or other means, for this purpose, or may
consult with group participants
individually. The Center must identify
the members of the group to OSEP
within eight weeks after receipt of the
award.
(f) Prior to developing any new
product, submit a proposal for the
product to the TACC database for
approval from the OSEP Project Officer.
The development of new products must
be consistent with the product
definition and guidelines posted on the
TACC Web site (www.tadnet.org).
(g) Contribute, on an ongoing basis,
updated information on the Center’s
approved and finalized products and
services to a database at TACC.
(h) Maintain ongoing communication
with the OSEP Project Officer through
monthly phone conversations and email
communication.
Fourth and Fifth Years of Project
In deciding whether to continue
funding the Center for the fourth and
fifth years, the Secretary will consider
the requirements of 34 CFR 75.253(a)
and in addition—
(a) The recommendation of a review
team consisting of experts selected by
the Secretary. This review team will be
conducted during a one-day intensive
meeting in Washington, DC, during the
last half of the project’s second year.
The Center must budget for travel
expenses associated with this one-day
intensive review.
(b) The timeliness and effectiveness
with which all requirements of the
negotiated cooperative agreement have
been or are being met by the Center; and
(c) The quality, relevance, and
usefulness of the Center’s activities and
the degree to which the Center’s
activities have contributed to changed
practices in State systems and improved
developmental and learning outcomes
for infants, toddlers and preschool
children with disabilities and their
families.
References
Blase, K. (2009). Technical Assistance to
Promote Service and System Change.
Roadmap to Effective Intervention
Interventions #4. Tampa, FL: University
of South Florida, Technical Assistance
Center on Social Emotional Intervention
for Young Children.
Bruder, M.B. (2010). Early childhood
intervention: A promise to children and
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
families for their future. Exceptional
Children, 76(3), 339–355.
Bruder, M.B., Mogro-Wilson, C., Stayton, V.,
and Dietrich, S. (2009). The national
status of in-service professional
development systems for early
intervention and early childhood special
education practitioners. Infants and
Young Children, 22(1), 13–20.
Fixsen, D.L., Blase, K.A., Horner, R., & Sugai,
G. (2009). Developing the capacity for
scaling up the effective use of evidencebased programs in state departments of
education. Chapel Hill, NC: The
University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, FPG Child Development Institute,
SISEP.
Infant & Toddler Coordinators Association.
(2011). ITCA 2011 Tipping Points
Survey—Part C implementation: State
Challenges and Responses. Retrieved
from www.ideainfanttoddler.org/board_
surveys.htm.
Odom, S. (2009). The tie that binds:
Evidence-based practice, implementation
science, and outcomes for children.
Topics in Early Childhood Special
Education, 29(1), 53–61.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:
Under the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) the Department
generally offers interested parties the
opportunity to comment on proposed
priorities and requirements. Section
681(d) of IDEA, however, makes the
public comment requirements of the
APA inapplicable to the priority in this
notice.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1463, and
1481.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82,
84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Education
Department debarment and suspension
regulations in 2 CFR part 3485.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to IHEs only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
agreement.
Estimated Available Funds:
$3,700,000 for the competition
announced in this notice for year one.
In year two through five we intend to
use an estimated $4,500,000 for the
competition.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in FY
2013 from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition.
Maximum Awards: We will reject any
application that proposes a budget
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
exceeding $3,700,000 for a single budget
period of 12 months in year one and
$4,500,000 for a single budget period of
12 months in years two through five.
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
may change the maximum amount
through a notice published in the
Federal Register.
Estimated Number of Awards: 1.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months with
an optional additional 24 months based
on performance. Applications must
include plans for both the 36 month
award and the 24 month extension.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: State
educational agencies; LEAs, including
public charter schools that are
considered LEAs under State law; IDEA
Part C State lead agencies; the State lead
agency designated under RTT–ELC;
IHEs; other public agencies; private
nonprofit organizations; outlying areas;
freely associated States; Indian tribes or
tribal organizations; and for-profit
organizations.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Other: General Requirements—(a)
The project funded under this
competition must make positive efforts
to employ and advance in employment
qualified individuals with disabilities
(see section 606 of IDEA).
(b) Applicants and the grant recipient
funded under this competition must
involve individuals with disabilities or
parents of individuals with disabilities
ages birth through 26 in planning,
implementing, and evaluating the
projects (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of
IDEA).
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: You can obtain an application
package via the Internet, from the
Education Publications Center (ED
Pubs), or from the program office.
To obtain a copy via the Internet, use
the following address: www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/grantapps/.
To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write,
fax, or call the following: ED Pubs, U.S.
Department of Education, P.O. Box
22207, Alexandria, VA 22304.
Telephone, toll free: 1–877–433–7827.
Fax: (703) 605–6794. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call,
toll free: 1–877–576–7734.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web
site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at its
email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package
from ED Pubs, be sure to identify this
program or competition as follows:
CFDA number 84.326P.
To obtain a copy from the program
office, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in
section VII of this notice.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
in an accessible format (e.g., braille,
large print, audiotape, or compact disc)
by contacting the person or team listed
under Accessible Format in section VIII
of this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
competition.
Page Limit: The application narrative
(Part III of the application) is where you,
the applicant, address the selection
criteria that reviewers use to evaluate
your application. You must limit the
application narrative to the equivalent
of no more than 70 pages, using the
following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11′, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial. An application submitted
in any other font (including Times
Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be
accepted.
The page limit does not apply to Part
I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; Part IV, the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract,
the resumes, the bibliography, the
references, or the letters of support.
However, the page limit does apply to
all of the application narrative section
(Part III).
We will reject your application if you
exceed the page limit or if you apply
other standards and exceed the
equivalent of the page limit.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: June 19, 2012.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: July 19, 2012.
Applications for grants under this
competition may be submitted
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36507
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov), or in paper
format by mail or hand delivery. For
information (including dates and times)
about how to submit your application
electronically, or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery, please refer to
section IV. 7. Other Submission
Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice. If
the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability in
connection with the application
process, the individual’s application
remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
competition is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System
Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and Central Contractor
Registry: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must—
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number
and TIN with the Central Contractor
Registry (CCR), the Government’s
primary registrant database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and
TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active CCR registration
with current information while your
application is under review by the
Department and, if you are awarded a
grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from
Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one business day.
If you are a corporate entity, agency,
institution, or organization, you can
obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue
Service. If you are an individual, you
can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security
Administration. If you need a new TIN,
please allow 2–5 weeks for your TIN to
become active.
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
36508
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
The CCR registration process may take
five or more business days to complete.
If you are currently registered with the
CCR, you may not need to make any
changes. However, please make certain
that the TIN associated with your DUNS
number is correct. Also note that you
will need to update your CCR
registration on an annual basis. This
may take three or more business days to
complete.
In addition, if you are submitting your
application via Grants.gov, you must (1)
be designated by your organization as an
Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these
steps are outlined at the following
Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/
applicants/get_registered.jsp).
7. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
competition may be submitted
electronically or in paper format by mail
or hand delivery.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
We are participating as a partner in
the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply
site. The Early Childhood Technical
Assistance Center competition, CFDA
number 84.326P, is included in this
project. We request your participation in
Grants.gov.
If you choose to submit your
application electronically, you must use
the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply
site at www.Grants.gov. Through this
site, you will be able to download a
copy of the application package,
complete it offline, and then upload and
submit your application. You may not
email an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
You may access the electronic grant
application for the Early Childhood
Technical Assistance Center
competition at www.Grants.gov. You
must search for the downloadable
application package for this competition
by the CFDA number. Do not include
the CFDA number’s alpha suffix in your
search (e.g., search for 84.326, not
84.326P).
Please note the following:
• Your participation in Grants.gov is
voluntary.
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov
are date and time stamped. Your
application must be fully uploaded and
submitted and must be date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system no
later than 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
Except as otherwise noted in this
section, we will not accept your
application if it is received—that is, date
and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system—after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, on the application deadline
date. We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements. When we retrieve your
application from Grants.gov, we will
notify you if we are rejecting your
application because it was date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors,
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this competition
to ensure that you submit your
application in a timely manner to the
Grants.gov system. You can also find the
Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov under News
and Events on the Department’s G5
system home page at www.G5.gov.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you submit your
application in paper format.
• If you submit your application
electronically, you must submit all
documents electronically, including all
information you typically provide on
the following forms: the Application for
Federal Assistance (SF 424), the
Department of Education Supplemental
Information for SF 424, Budget
Information—Non-Construction
Programs (ED 524), and all necessary
assurances and certifications.
• If you submit your application
electronically, you must upload any
narrative sections and all other
attachments to your application as files
in a PDF (Portable Document) read-only,
non-modifiable format. Do not upload
an interactive or fillable PDF file. If you
upload a file type other than a readonly, non-modifiable PDF or submit a
password-protected file, we will not
review that material.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page-limit
requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive from
Grants.gov an automatic notification of
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
receipt that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. (This notification
indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not
receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your
application from Grants.gov and send a
second notification to you by email.
This second notification indicates that
the Department has received your
application and has assigned your
application a PR/Award number (an EDspecified identifying number unique to
your application).
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are
experiencing problems submitting your
application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll free, at 1–800–518–4726. You must
obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from
electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this
notice.
If you submit an application after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in
section VII of this notice and provide an
explanation of the technical problem
you experienced with Grants.gov, along
with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number. We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the
Grants.gov system and that that problem
affected your ability to submit your
application by 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a
determination is made on whether your
application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in
this section apply only to the unavailability
of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension
if you failed to fully register to submit your
application to Grants.gov before the
application deadline date and time or if the
technical problem you experienced is
unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
If you submit your application in
paper format by mail (through the U.S.
Postal Service or a commercial carrier),
you must mail the original and two
copies of your application, on or before
the application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.326P), LBJ Basement
Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–4260.
You must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Note: the U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you submit your application in
paper format by hand delivery, you (or
a courier service) must deliver the
original and two copies of your
application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.326P), 550 12th
Street SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays,
and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of
Paper Applications: If you mail or hand
deliver your application to the
Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the
Department—in Item 11 of the SF 424
the CFDA number, including suffix
letter, if any, of the competition under
which you are submitting your
application; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
(2) The Application Control Center
will mail to you a notification of receipt
of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15
business days from the application
deadline date, you should call the U.S.
Department of Education Application
Control Center at (202) 245–6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this competition are from 34
CFR 75.210 and are listed in the
application package.
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary also requires
various assurances including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department of
Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4,
108.8, and 110.23).
3. Additional Review and Selection
Process Factors: In the past, the
Department has had difficulty finding
peer reviewers for certain competitions
because so many individuals who are
eligible to serve as peer reviewers have
conflicts of interest. The Standing Panel
requirements under section 682(b) of
IDEA also have placed additional
constraints on the availability of
reviewers. Therefore, the Department
has determined that, for some
discretionary grant competitions,
applications may be separated into two
or more groups and ranked and selected
for funding within the specific groups.
This procedure will make it easier for
the Department to find peer reviewers
by ensuring that greater numbers of
individuals who are eligible to serve as
reviewers for any particular group of
applicants will not have conflicts of
interest. It also will increase the quality,
independence, and fairness of the
review process, while permitting panel
members to review applications under
discretionary grant competitions for
which they also have submitted
applications. However, if the
Department decides to select an equal
number of applications in each group
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36509
for funding, this may result in different
cut-off points for fundable applications
in each group.
4. Special Conditions: Under 34 CFR
74.14 and 80.12, the Secretary may
impose special conditions on a grant if
the applicant or grantee is not
financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a
financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 34
CFR parts 74 or 80, as applicable; has
not fulfilled the conditions of a prior
grant; or is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multi-year award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: Under the
Government Performance and Results
Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Department has
established a set of performance
measures, including long-term
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
36510
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
measures, that are designed to yield
information on various aspects of the
effectiveness and quality of the
Technical Assistance and Dissemination
to Improve Services and Results for
Children with Disabilities program.
These measures focus on the extent to
which projects provide high-quality
products and services, the relevance of
project products and services to
educational and early intervention
policy and practice, and the use of
products and services to improve
educational and early intervention
policy and practice.
Grantees will be required to report
information on their project’s
performance in annual reports to the
Department (34 CFR 75.590).
5. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award, the Secretary may
consider, under 34 CFR 75.253, the
extent to which a grantee has made
‘‘substantial progress toward meeting
the objectives in its approved
application.’’ This consideration
includes the review of a grantee’s
progress in meeting the targets and
projected outcomes in its approved
application, and whether the grantee
has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application
and budget. In making a continuation
grant, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in
compliance with the assurances in its
approved application, including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
Julia
Martin Eile, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 4056, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2600.
Telephone: (202) 245–7431.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: June 13, 2012.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2012–14942 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards:
Personnel Development To Improve
Services and Results for Children With
Disabilities; National Center for
Development of Coursework and
Training Modules To Improve Services
and Results for Children With
Disabilities
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) by
contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD or a TTY, call
the FRS, toll free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
Overview Information; Personnel
Development To Improve Services and
Results for Children With Disabilities—
National Center for Development of
Coursework and Training Modules To
Improve Services and Results for
Children With Disabilities
Notice inviting applications for new
awards for fiscal year (FY) 2012.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.325E.
Applications Available: June 19,
2012.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: July 30, 2012.
DATES:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purposes of
this program are to (1) help address
State-identified needs for highly
qualified personnel—in special
education, related services, early
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
intervention, and regular education—to
work with children, including infants
and toddlers, with disabilities; and (2)
ensure that those personnel have the
necessary skills and knowledge, derived
from practices that have been
determined, through evidence-based
research and experience, to be
successful in serving those children.
Priority: In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(iv), this priority is from
allowable activities specified in the
statute (see sections 662 and 681 of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act (IDEA)).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2012 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is: National Center for
Development of Coursework and
Training Modules to Improve Services
and Results for Children with
Disabilities.
Background: The purpose of this
priority is to fund a cooperative
agreement to support the establishment
and operation of a National Center for
Development of Coursework and
Training Modules to Improve Services
and Results for Children with
Disabilities.
Educator effectiveness is a key factor
in improving developmental and
learning outcomes (e.g., academic,
social, emotional, behavioral) for all
children, including children with
disabilities (birth through age 21);
supporting a child’s growth toward
improved developmental and learning
outcomes; and supporting the families
of children with disabilities (Jaquith,
Mindich, Wei, & Darling-Hammond,
2010; Institute of Medicine (IOM) and
National Research Council (NRC), 2012).
Use of evidence-based instructional and
intervention practices by educators also
is linked to improved outcomes for
children, including children with
disabilities (Blanton, Pugach, & Florian,
2011). Given the importance of educator
effectiveness and evidence-based
practices in advancing the development
and learning of children, it is essential
that all educators have the knowledge
and skills necessary to use specific,
evidence-based instructional and
intervention practices to teach diverse
learners and ensure that all students,
including children with disabilities, can
achieve grade-level college- and careerready standards (Blanton et al., 2011).
Educators also must know how to
continuously monitor children’s
progress, make data-based decisions,
and work collaboratively with other
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36501-36510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14942]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards: Technical Assistance and
Dissemination To Improve Services and Results for Children With
Disabilities; Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 36502]]
Overview Information Technical Assistance and Dissemination To Improve
Services and Results for Children With Disabilities--Early Childhood
Technical Assistance Center
Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY)
2012.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.326P.
DATES: Applications Available: June 19, 2012.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 19, 2012.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Programs: The purpose of the Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with
Disabilities program is to promote academic achievement and to improve
results for children with disabilities by providing technical
assistance (TA), supporting model demonstration projects, disseminating
useful information, and implementing activities that are supported by
scientifically based research.
Priority: In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), this priority
is from allowable activities specified in the statute or otherwise
authorized in the statute (see sections 663 and 681(d)of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. 1463 and
1481(d)).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2012 and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition,
this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we
consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is: Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.
Background: The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is
committed to ensuring that all infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities receive effective services in natural
environments and inclusive settings that promote positive developmental
and learning outcomes. Effective services depend on: (1) The quality of
early intervention programs authorized under Part C of IDEA and
preschool programs authorized under Part B of IDEA; (2) the
coordination of these programs with each other and with other early
childhood programs that serve infants, toddlers, and preschool children
with disabilities and their families; and (3) the capacity of early
childhood programs to scale up and sustain effective implementation
components to support the use of evidence-based interventions at the
local program level. OSEP has supported the implementation of IDEA Part
C early intervention services and Part B preschool services by funding
technical assistance (TA) centers that have helped States strengthen
their State and local systems and build the capacity of providers to
improve developmental and learning outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and their families. OSEP will
further this work by funding a cooperative agreement to support the
establishment and operation of an Early Childhood Technical Assistance
Center (Center). The Center will support States in administering high-
quality and effective IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool programs through TA and recommendations for practice.
In recent years, States have faced a growing number of challenges
as they implement the IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool programs. In addition to the economic and fiscal challenges
at the State and local levels, States are seeing an increase in the
number of infants, toddlers, and preschool children with complex needs
who are eligible for services under IDEA Part C early intervention and
Part B preschool programs (Part C State Performance Plan (SPP)/Annual
Performance Report (APR) 2011 Indicator Analyses, FFY 2009-10; Part B
SPP/APR 2011 Indicator Analyses, FFY 2009-10). Moreover, given the
complexity of and interplay between these programs, many States
struggle with difficult systems issues, such as: (1) Ensuring that all
children eligible for services under Part C of IDEA are identified and
evaluated or screened; (2) maximizing all available funding sources for
IDEA Part C services; (3) improving transition services for children
who are first served under an IDEA Part C program and then receive IDEA
Part B preschool services; (4) collecting valid and reliable child and
family outcome data under IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool programs to inform program improvement; and (5) coordinating
with other early childhood programs (Infant and Toddler Coordinators
Association Tipping Points Survey, 2011; Part C SPP/APR 2011 Indicator
Analyses, FFY 2009-10; Part B SPP/APR 2011 Indicator Analyses, FFY
2009-10).
To meet the challenges of implementing IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool programs, program administrators must
understand the elements that are necessary to implement high-quality
early intervention and preschool programs effectively and efficiently.
Ensuring that Part C early intervention and Part B preschool programs
are coordinating with other early childhood programs in a State is one
such element that could increase a program's effectiveness and
efficiency. However, developing a coordinated and integrated early
childhood system within a State is a significant challenge because
there are multiple early childhood programs (e.g., IDEA Part C early
intervention; IDEA Part B preschool; Head Start; Early Head Start;
child care; State-funded Pre-K programs) administered by different
agencies with different policies, procedures, and funding streams, and
infants, toddlers, and preschool children with disabilities are often
served by more than one of these programs at a time. Overcoming this
overarching challenge to provide a coordinated and integrated early
childhood system is critical to ensuring that infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and their families receive high-
quality services from the array of early childhood programs that are
available to serve them. As States continue to work towards designing
and implementing a coordinated and integrated system of early childhood
programs and services through such initiatives as the Race To the Top--
Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC), it is critical that support be
provided to the IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool
programs to assist them in aligning resources and policies across
multiple levels (e.g., State, regional, local) of the early childhood
service system. Such support would help these programs reduce
inefficiencies across early childhood programs, and improve the quality
of services for infants, toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities and their families.
A challenge at the local program level is the lack of adequately
trained personnel who can implement effective services and evidence-
based interventions, suggesting that infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities may not be achieving the learning and
developmental outcomes that are possible (Bruder, 2010; Odom, 2009). In
surveys of State Part C and Part B, Section 619 Coordinators,
respondents have expressed concern that personnel who work with
infants, toddlers, and preschool children with disabilities and their
families are not adequately trained (Bruder, Mogro-Wilson, Stayton, &
Dietrich, 2009). Furthermore, although the Division of Early Childhood
of the Council for Exceptional Children's (DEC)
[[Page 36503]]
recommended practices for personnel working with infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and their families is a valuable
resource on intervention practices used by the field, that resource
needs to be updated to include current research on implementing high-
quality, coordinated, and integrated early childhood systems; effective
services; and evidence-based interventions.
IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B, Section 619 program
administrators must ensure that their programs and providers are
delivering effective services and evidence-based interventions. To do
so, States must have ``implementation components'' in place at the
State and local levels to support providers in using effective services
and evidence-based interventions. ``Implementation components'' are the
organizational supports that allow providers to develop the competence
needed to implement effective services and evidence-based interventions
in the way they were designed to be delivered (Fixsen, Blas[eacute],
Horner, & Sugai, 2009). Examples of implementation components include
professional development and training, ongoing consultation and
coaching, performance assessments, data systems to support decision
making, administrative support to ensure personnel have the resources
and skills they need to implement interventions, and systems that align
policies and funding mechanisms across multiple levels (e.g., State,
regional, local) (Fixsen et al., 2009). Once implementation components
are in place and the system's capacity to implement effective services
and evidence-based interventions is established, the State will be
better equipped to implement, scale up, and sustain a range of
effective services and evidence-based interventions across multiple
programs (Fixsen et al., 2009).
Establishing high-quality, effective and efficient IDEA Part C
early intervention and Part B preschool programs that are coordinated
and integrated with other early childhood programs and that have the
capacity to support providers in implementing effective services and
evidence-based interventions for infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities and their families, requires changes to a
State's early childhood services system at multiple levels. TA has been
identified as a strategy to facilitate these changes (Blas[eacute],
2009). Recognizing the complexity of systems change, particularly with
respect to a system as complex as the system of services through which
early childhood services are provided, intensive TA is needed at the
State level so that a State can overcome challenges and support local
early childhood programs in delivering evidence-based, high-quality,
effective, coordinated, and integrated services and interventions to
improve developmental and learning outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and their families.
Priority: Under this priority, the Department will fund a
cooperative agreement to establish and operate an Early Childhood
Technical Assistance Center (Center) to support States in administering
IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool programs.
Specifically, the Center will provide TA to States to assist them in:
(1) Implementing high-quality, effective, and efficient IDEA Part C
early intervention and Part B preschool programs; (2) coordinating the
IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool programs with one
another as well as with other early childhood programs in the State;
and (3) implementing effective services and evidence-based
interventions in early childhood programs that result in positive
developmental and learning outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and their families.
In addition, the Center will develop a set of empirically supported
recommendations for practice on: (1) Policies that promote a high-
quality, coordinated, and integrated system of early childhood
programs; and (2) services and interventions that result in positive
developmental and learning outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and their families.
With additional funding in years two through five, the Center will
increase its scope of work and assist States in continued development
and refinement of the State's child and family outcomes measurement
systems for the IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool
programs.
To be considered for funding under this absolute priority,
applicants must meet the application requirements contained in this
priority. Any project funded under this absolute priority also must
meet the programmatic and administrative requirements specified in the
priority.
Application Requirements. An applicant must include in its
application--
(a) A logic model that depicts, at a minimum, the goals,
activities, outputs, and outcomes of the proposed project. A logic
model communicates how a project will achieve its outcomes and provides
a framework for both the formative and summative evaluations of the
project;
Note: The following Web sites provide more information on logic
models: www.researchutilization.org/matrix/logicmodel_resource3c.html and www.tadnet.org/model_and_performance.
(b) A plan to implement the activities described in the Project
Activities section of this priority;
(c) A plan, linked to the proposed project's logic model, for a
formative evaluation of the proposed project's activities. The plan
must describe how the formative evaluation will use clear performance
objectives to ensure continuous improvement in the operation of the
proposed project, including objective measures of progress in
implementing the project and ensuring the quality of products and
services. This plan must include how the Center will collect data on
all components of the Center activities;
(d) A budget for a summative evaluation to be conducted by an
independent third party, who must be approved by OSEP;
(e) A budget dedicating a minimum of $300,000 in year one of the
project to cover the costs of carrying out the tasks described in
paragraph (d) of the Knowledge Development Activities section of this
priority;
(f) A budget dedicating a minimum of $900,000 annually to cover the
costs of carrying out tasks in paragraph (e) of the Knowledge
Development Activities section of this priority and paragraphs
(a)(1)(i)(E), (a)(2)(vi), (a)(3)(iii), and (b) in the Technical
Assistance and Dissemination Activities section of this priority
related to supporting the implementation of effective services and
evidence-based interventions that result in positive developmental and
learning outcomes for infants, toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities and their families;
(g) A budget for attendance at the following:
(1) A two-day kick-off meeting to be held in Washington, DC, after
receipt of the award, and an annual planning meeting held in
Washington, DC, with the OSEP Project Officer during each subsequent
year of the project period.
Note: Within 30 days of receipt of the award, a post-award
teleconference must be held between the OSEP Project Officer and the
grantee's Project Director or other authorized representative.
(2) A three-day Project Directors' Conference in Washington, DC,
during each year of the project period.
(3) A two-day Leveraging Resources conference in Washington, DC,
during each year of the project period.
[[Page 36504]]
(4) A three-day Leadership Conference in Washington, DC, during
each year of the project period.
(5) Two two-day trips annually to attend Department briefings,
Department-sponsored conferences, and other meetings, as requested by
OSEP; and
(h) A line item in the proposed budget for an annual set-aside of
five percent of the grant amount to support emerging needs that are
consistent with the proposed project's activities, as those needs are
identified in consultation with OSEP.
Note: With approval from the OSEP Project Officer, the Center
must reallocate any remaining funds from this annual set-aside no
later than the end of the third quarter of each budget period.
Project Activities. To meet the requirements of this priority, the
Center, at a minimum, must conduct the following activities:
Knowledge Development Activities
(a) In the first three months of the project period, identify a
minimum of six States to partner with to develop a framework \1\ for
high-quality, effective, and efficient IDEA Part C early intervention
and Part B preschool programs. Each partnering State must have
commitments from its IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool programs to participate in the activities of the Center.
Factors for consideration in selecting these States could include the
type of State lead agency designated to implement IDEA Part C (e.g.,
health or education); funding mechanisms (use of private and public
insurance, family fees, or parent cost participation to pay for IDEA
Part C services, and State fund contributions for IDEA Part C and Part
B preschool programs); interagency collaboration agreements;
eligibility criteria for IDEA Part C (e.g., narrow versus broad
eligibility for IDEA services for children with developmental delays or
at-risk children or birth-mandate States); staffing of programs (e.g.,
contracting versus hiring staff); approach to services
(multidisciplinary, transdisciplinary, etc.); recipient of an RTT-ELC
grant; and performance on APRs. The Center must obtain approval from
OSEP on the final selection of partnering States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For the purposes of this priority, ``framework'' means a
guide for decision making.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) In the first two years of the project period, partner with the
States identified in response to paragraph (a) of this section to
develop, implement, and evaluate a framework for high-quality,
effective, and efficient IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B
preschool programs. In developing this framework, the Center must work
with its partner States to identify, describe, and document the
elements that make up IDEA Part C and Part B preschool programs and
describe what must exist within each element to create high-quality,
effective, and efficient programs. These elements must include, but are
not limited to, the following: Governance structure; funding mechanism;
interagency agreements and coordination; service delivery model;
personnel standards and qualifications; professional development
system; TA system; comprehensive data system; accountability and
outcome measurement system; and evaluation and program quality and
improvement system. The Center must implement an iterative process for
the development, implementation, and evaluation of the framework where
parts of it are developed, implemented, and evaluated before the entire
framework is completed, ensuring that it is an effective framework for
the partner States and other States to use.
(c) On an annual basis, compile and analyze data on all States'
APRs and updated SPPs for IDEA Part C indicators and Part B indicators
that relate to preschool programs, provide an analysis of States'
success in meeting compliance and performance indicators, and use the
analysis as the basis for providing States a continuum of TA.
(d) In year one of the project, collaborate with the DEC to update
the current set of DEC recommended practices related to: (1) Policies
that promote a high-quality, coordinated, and integrated early
childhood system and provide a foundation necessary to facilitate the
use of recommended practices by providers serving infants, toddlers,
and preschool children with disabilities and their families; and (2)
effective services and evidence-based interventions that result in
positive developmental and learning outcomes for infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and their families. The Center
must work with the Early Childhood Personnel Center (that will be
updating the DEC's recommended practices related to professional
development), if funded by OSEP, to finalize the process to update the
recommended practices so that they reflect current research. The
recommended practices must be made available at no cost to consumers on
the Center's Web site, as required under paragraph (a)(1)(i) in the
Technical Assistance and Dissemination Activities section of this
priority.
(e) Identify, document, and describe the implementation components
needed to support the use and sustainability of effective services and
evidence-based interventions in early childhood programs that serve
infants, toddlers, and preschool children with disabilities and their
families, consistent with paragraph (a)(3)(iii)(B) of the Technical
Assistance and Dissemination Activities section of this priority.
Technical Assistance and Dissemination Activities
(a) Provide a continuum of TA and dissemination activities that
improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of early childhood
programs that support the use of effective services and evidence-based
interventions that result in positive developmental and learning
outcomes for infants, toddlers, and preschool children with
disabilities and their families. The continuum must include the
following:
(1) General TA to States, early childhood programs, professional
development providers, faculty at institutions of higher education
(IHEs), researchers, early childhood personnel, families, and other
relevant stakeholders. At a minimum, the Center must conduct the
following activities:
(i) Develop and disseminate reports, products, guidance,
implementation tools, and other materials at no cost to the consumer
on:
(A) Current recommendations for practice related to--
(1) Policies that promote a high-quality, coordinated, and
integrated early childhood system and provide a foundation necessary
for providers to use the recommended practices to serve infants,
toddlers, and preschool children with disabilities and their families;
and
(2) Effective services and evidence-based interventions that result
in positive developmental and learning outcomes for infants, toddlers,
and preschool children with disabilities and their families.
(B) The framework for high-quality, effective, and efficient IDEA
Part C and Part B preschool programs.
(C) The analysis of all State data collected for IDEA Part C
indicators that relate to early intervention programs and Part B
indicators that relate to preschool programs.
(D) Collecting quality child and family outcome data, and using
child and family outcome data for program improvement.
(E) Critical features of the implementation components needed to
support the use, scaling up, and sustainability of effective services
and evidence-based interventions in early
[[Page 36505]]
childhood programs at the State and local program levels.
(ii) Maintain a Web site that meets government or industry-
recognized standards for accessibility and that links to the Web site
operated by the Technical Assistance Coordination Center (TACC).
(iii) In consultation with the OSEP Project Officer, make selected
reports, documents, and other materials available in both English and
Spanish.
(2) Targeted TA to States and other relevant stakeholders to
improve their capacity to implement high-quality, effective, and
efficient IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool programs
and to support the use of effective services and evidence-based
interventions in early childhood programs at the local level. At a
minimum, the Center must conduct the following activities:
(i) Assist States in preparing for IDEA Part C early intervention
and Part B preschool monitoring and accountability activities related
to serving infants, toddlers, and preschool children with disabilities
and their families and implementing the State's corrective action plan
and improvement activities as appropriate.
(ii) Assist States in meeting IDEA Part C early intervention and
Part B preschool program indicator targets in their SPPs when reporting
data on their APRs, including child and family outcome data for program
improvement; and meeting new requirements in the IDEA Part C
regulations issued on September 28, 2011 (76 FR 60140).
(iii) Plan and implement activities, which could include webinars,
meetings, video conferences, and Web sites to support States in the
continued development and refinement of a child and family outcomes
measurement system, including using data for IDEA Part C early
intervention and Part B preschool program improvement.
(iv) Assist States in their efforts to better coordinate their
early childhood programs to ensure that infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and their families receive high-
quality services and to scale up and sustain effective implementation
components in early childhood programs.
(v) Provide a forum for researchers, professional development
providers, early childhood personnel, IHE faculty, and other relevant
stakeholders to collaborate through learning communities, communities
of practice, or other mechanisms to discuss recommended practices
related to high-quality early childhood systems, effective services,
and evidenced-based interventions in early childhood programs and
methods to support their use.
(3) Intensive TA to States to improve their capacity to implement
high-quality, effective, and efficient early childhood programs that
serve infants, toddlers, and preschool children with disabilities and
their families and scale up and sustain effective implementation
components to support the use of effective services and evidence-based
interventions in early childhood programs at the local level. At a
minimum, the Center must conduct the following activities:
(i) Provide TA to States on implementing the framework for high-
quality, effective, and efficient IDEA Part C early intervention and
Part B preschool programs developed under paragraph (a) in the
Knowledge Development Activities section of this priority in the first
and second years of the project period.
(ii) In years two through five of the project period, provide TA to
States on implementing a high-quality child and family outcomes
measurement system that takes into account the following components:
purpose of the outcomes measurement system, data collection and
transmission, data analysis, reporting, using data, evaluation, and
cross-system coordination. In carrying out this activity, the Center
must collaborate with the Early Childhood Data Center, if funded by
OSEP, to prevent duplication of effort.
(iii) Select a minimum of four States to build their capacity to
scale up and sustain effective implementation components to support the
use of effective services and evidence-based interventions at the local
early childhood program level. The Center must develop a plan and
criteria for selecting the States with which they will work. Factors
for selecting States for consideration could include the State's early
childhood priorities and initiatives; the commitment of the State's
multiple early childhood programs to participate in the TA to support
the developmental and learning outcomes of infants, toddlers, and
preschool children with disabilities and their families; the commitment
of the State's IHEs, including community colleges, to prepare
preservice personnel on the use of the evidence-based interventions
that may be scaled up within the State; the commitment of the early
intervention and community-based early childhood programs in high-need
communities and high-need local educational agencies (LEAs) \2\ to
participate in the TA; and the demographic and geographic
characteristics of each State, including the percentage of young
children who are high-need children with disabilities.\3\ The Center
must obtain approval from OSEP on the final selection of States. At a
minimum, the Center must conduct the following activities with the
selected States:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For the purposes of this priority, the term ``high-need
local educational agency'' means an LEA (a) that serves not fewer
than 10,000 children from families with incomes below the poverty
line; or (b) for which not less than 20 percent of the children
served by the LEA are from families with incomes below the poverty
line.
\3\ For the purposes of this priority, ``high-need children with
disabilities'' refers to children (ages birth through 5) who are
eligible for services under IDEA, and who may be further
disadvantaged and at risk of educational failure because they: (1)
Are living in poverty, (2) are homeless, (3) are in foster care, (4)
are English learners, (5) are new immigrants, or (6) are migrant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Assist the selected States in identifying effective services
and evidence-based interventions for infants, toddlers, and preschool
children with disabilities and their families that the States will
implement and scale up. Based on the interventions and services
identified, the Center must support the implementation and scale up of
the interventions and services through direct TA or by contracting with
experts in the field.
(B) Assist each selected State to identify and establish a minimum
of six implementation sites in early childhood programs at the local
level to identify, document, and describe implementation components and
their effectiveness. The Center must develop criteria for selecting the
implementation sites. These criteria must be designed to ensure that
the sites serve children from diverse backgrounds in a variety of
settings, including early intervention and community-based early
childhood programs in high-need LEAs.
(C) Assist each selected State in developing, implementing, and
evaluating a plan to scale up and sustain effective implementation
components to support the use of effective services and evidence-based
interventions across local early childhood programs within each State,
including early intervention and community-based early childhood
programs in high-need LEAs.
(b) Establish a national TA network of a cadre of experts on
implementation that will support the Center to provide TA to States and
local early childhood programs to strengthen their capacity to scale up
and sustain effective implementation components.
[[Page 36506]]
Leadership and Coordination Activities
(a) Communicate and collaborate, on an ongoing basis, with OSEP-
funded TA projects, including the TACC, the Regional Resource Centers
Program, and early childhood-focused centers funded by the Departments
of Education and Health and Human Services (HHS), as appropriate. This
collaboration could include the joint development of products, the
coordination of TA services, and the planning and carrying out of TA
meetings and events.
(b) Lead the Early Childhood Technical Assistance Consortium
(ECTA).\4\ The following Web site provides more information on ECTA:
www.ectaconsortium.org/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The ECTA Consortium includes national projects that are
funded by the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services
that provide TA in support of States' efforts in building
coordinated early learning and development systems. The purpose of
the consortium is to: coordinate early childhood TA efforts that
support States in building and sustaining their systems for early
learning and development; share knowledge and resources for
improving the delivery and impact of TA; identify strategies for
working collaboratively; enhance each other's TA efforts; and
explore options to leverage resources to benefit respective
constituencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Work with other Federal and State TA efforts to ensure that
IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool programs are
considered in the development of coordinated early learning and
development systems for children ages birth through five and their
families. These efforts must include--
(1) In States with RTT-ELC grants, supporting the involvement of
IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool programs in
planning and implementing RTT-ELC grant activities; and
(2) Supporting the participation of IDEA Part C early intervention
and Part B, Section 619 Coordinators on State Advisory Councils on
Early Childhood Education and Care.
(d) Work with other Federal and State TA efforts to strengthen
linkages between IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool
programs and birth through 3rd grade initiatives.
(e) Consult with a group of persons, including representatives from
State and local IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool
programs; State level administrators from other early child systems
(e.g., State Child Care Administrators and Head Start Collaboration
Directors); early childhood personnel; parents of infants, toddlers, or
preschool children with disabilities; representatives from other OSEP-
funded TA projects; representatives from HHS-funded TA projects;
faculty in personnel preparation; and researchers, as appropriate, on
the activities and outcomes of the Center and solicit programmatic
support and advice from various participants in the group, as
appropriate. The Center may convene meetings, whether in person, by
phone or other means, for this purpose, or may consult with group
participants individually. The Center must identify the members of the
group to OSEP within eight weeks after receipt of the award.
(f) Prior to developing any new product, submit a proposal for the
product to the TACC database for approval from the OSEP Project
Officer. The development of new products must be consistent with the
product definition and guidelines posted on the TACC Web site
(www.tadnet.org).
(g) Contribute, on an ongoing basis, updated information on the
Center's approved and finalized products and services to a database at
TACC.
(h) Maintain ongoing communication with the OSEP Project Officer
through monthly phone conversations and email communication.
Fourth and Fifth Years of Project
In deciding whether to continue funding the Center for the fourth
and fifth years, the Secretary will consider the requirements of 34 CFR
75.253(a) and in addition--
(a) The recommendation of a review team consisting of experts
selected by the Secretary. This review team will be conducted during a
one-day intensive meeting in Washington, DC, during the last half of
the project's second year. The Center must budget for travel expenses
associated with this one-day intensive review.
(b) The timeliness and effectiveness with which all requirements of
the negotiated cooperative agreement have been or are being met by the
Center; and
(c) The quality, relevance, and usefulness of the Center's
activities and the degree to which the Center's activities have
contributed to changed practices in State systems and improved
developmental and learning outcomes for infants, toddlers and preschool
children with disabilities and their families.
References
Blase, K. (2009). Technical Assistance to Promote Service and System
Change. Roadmap to Effective Intervention Interventions #4. Tampa,
FL: University of South Florida, Technical Assistance Center on
Social Emotional Intervention for Young Children.
Bruder, M.B. (2010). Early childhood intervention: A promise to
children and families for their future. Exceptional Children, 76(3),
339-355.
Bruder, M.B., Mogro-Wilson, C., Stayton, V., and Dietrich, S.
(2009). The national status of in-service professional development
systems for early intervention and early childhood special education
practitioners. Infants and Young Children, 22(1), 13-20.
Fixsen, D.L., Blase, K.A., Horner, R., & Sugai, G. (2009).
Developing the capacity for scaling up the effective use of
evidence-based programs in state departments of education. Chapel
Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, FPG Child
Development Institute, SISEP.
Infant & Toddler Coordinators Association. (2011). ITCA 2011 Tipping
Points Survey--Part C implementation: State Challenges and
Responses. Retrieved from www.ideainfanttoddler.org/board_surveys.htm.
Odom, S. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice,
implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early
Childhood Special Education, 29(1), 53-61.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) the Department generally offers interested
parties the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities and
requirements. Section 681(d) of IDEA, however, makes the public comment
requirements of the APA inapplicable to the priority in this notice.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1463, and 1481.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80,
81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Education Department debarment
and suspension regulations in 2 CFR part 3485.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to IHEs only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative agreement.
Estimated Available Funds: $3,700,000 for the competition announced
in this notice for year one. In year two through five we intend to use
an estimated $4,500,000 for the competition.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2013 from the list of
unfunded applicants from this competition.
Maximum Awards: We will reject any application that proposes a
budget
[[Page 36507]]
exceeding $3,700,000 for a single budget period of 12 months in year
one and $4,500,000 for a single budget period of 12 months in years two
through five. The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services may change the maximum amount through a notice
published in the Federal Register.
Estimated Number of Awards: 1.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months with an optional additional 24
months based on performance. Applications must include plans for both
the 36 month award and the 24 month extension.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: State educational agencies; LEAs, including
public charter schools that are considered LEAs under State law; IDEA
Part C State lead agencies; the State lead agency designated under RTT-
ELC; IHEs; other public agencies; private nonprofit organizations;
outlying areas; freely associated States; Indian tribes or tribal
organizations; and for-profit organizations.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Other: General Requirements--(a) The project funded under this
competition must make positive efforts to employ and advance in
employment qualified individuals with disabilities (see section 606 of
IDEA).
(b) Applicants and the grant recipient funded under this
competition must involve individuals with disabilities or parents of
individuals with disabilities ages birth through 26 in planning,
implementing, and evaluating the projects (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of
IDEA).
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: You can obtain an
application package via the Internet, from the Education Publications
Center (ED Pubs), or from the program office.
To obtain a copy via the Internet, use the following address:
www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/grantapps/.
To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write, fax, or call the following:
ED Pubs, U.S. Department of Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria, VA
22304. Telephone, toll free: 1-877-433-7827. Fax: (703) 605-6794. If
you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call, toll free: 1-877-576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at
its email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package from ED Pubs, be sure to
identify this program or competition as follows: CFDA number 84.326P.
To obtain a copy from the program office, contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this notice.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or compact disc) by contacting the person or team listed under
Accessible Format in section VIII of this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this competition.
Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application)
is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that
reviewers use to evaluate your application. You must limit the
application narrative to the equivalent of no more than 70 pages, using
the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5 x 11[foot], on one side only,
with 1 margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial. An application submitted in any other font
(including Times Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be accepted.
The page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II,
the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part
IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the
resumes, the bibliography, the references, or the letters of support.
However, the page limit does apply to all of the application narrative
section (Part III).
We will reject your application if you exceed the page limit or if
you apply other standards and exceed the equivalent of the page limit.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: June 19, 2012.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 19, 2012.
Applications for grants under this competition may be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov), or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery. For information (including dates
and times) about how to submit your application electronically, or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery, please refer to section IV. 7.
Other Submission Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and Central Contractor Registry: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must--
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the Central
Contractor Registry (CCR), the Government's primary registrant
database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active CCR registration with current information
while your application is under review by the Department and, if you
are awarded a grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one business day.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service.
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a
new TIN, please allow 2-5 weeks for your TIN to become active.
[[Page 36508]]
The CCR registration process may take five or more business days to
complete. If you are currently registered with the CCR, you may not
need to make any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN
associated with your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will
need to update your CCR registration on an annual basis. This may take
three or more business days to complete.
In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov,
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the
following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp).
7. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this competition may be submitted electronically or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
We are participating as a partner in the Governmentwide Grants.gov
Apply site. The Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center
competition, CFDA number 84.326P, is included in this project. We
request your participation in Grants.gov.
If you choose to submit your application electronically, you must
use the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at www.Grants.gov. Through
this site, you will be able to download a copy of the application
package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit your
application. You may not email an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
You may access the electronic grant application for the Early
Childhood Technical Assistance Center competition at www.Grants.gov.
You must search for the downloadable application package for this
competition by the CFDA number. Do not include the CFDA number's alpha
suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.326, not 84.326P).
Please note the following:
Your participation in Grants.gov is voluntary.
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply
with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application
because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5
system home page at www.G5.gov.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you submit your application in paper format.
If you submit your application electronically, you must
submit all documents electronically, including all information you
typically provide on the following forms: the Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of Education Supplemental
Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs
(ED 524), and all necessary assurances and certifications.
If you submit your application electronically, you must
upload any narrative sections and all other attachments to your
application as files in a PDF (Portable Document) read-only, non-
modifiable format. Do not upload an interactive or fillable PDF file.
If you upload a file type other than a read-only, non-modifiable PDF or
submit a password-protected file, we will not review that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send
a second notification to you by email. This second notification
indicates that the Department has received your application and has
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a determination is made on whether
your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
[[Page 36509]]
If you submit your application in paper format by mail (through the
U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier), you must mail the
original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.326P), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: the U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you submit your application in paper format by hand delivery,
you (or a courier service) must deliver the original and two copies of
your application by hand, on or before the application deadline date,
to the Department at the following address: U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.326P), 550 12th Street SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you mail
or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the
Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including suffix
letter, if any, of the competition under which you are submitting your
application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a notification
of receipt of your grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the application deadline
date, you should call the U.S. Department of Education Application
Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 75.210 and are listed in the application package.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
also requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
of Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Additional Review and Selection Process Factors: In the past,
the Department has had difficulty finding peer reviewers for certain
competitions because so many individuals who are eligible to serve as
peer reviewers have conflicts of interest. The Standing Panel
requirements under section 682(b) of IDEA also have placed additional
constraints on the availability of reviewers. Therefore, the Department
has determined that, for some discretionary grant competitions,
applications may be separated into two or more groups and ranked and
selected for funding within the specific groups. This procedure will
make it easier for the Department to find peer reviewers by ensuring
that greater numbers of individuals who are eligible to serve as
reviewers for any particular group of applicants will not have
conflicts of interest. It also will increase the quality, independence,
and fairness of the review process, while permitting panel members to
review applications under discretionary grant competitions for which
they also have submitted applications. However, if the Department
decides to select an equal number of applications in each group for
funding, this may result in different cut-off points for fundable
applications in each group.
4. Special Conditions: Under 34 CFR 74.14 and 80.12, the Secretary
may impose special conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is
not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance;
has a financial or other management system that does not meet the
standards in 34 CFR parts 74 or 80, as applicable; has not fulfilled
the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN). We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: Under the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Department has established a set of
performance measures, including long-term
[[Page 36510]]
measures, that are designed to yield information on various aspects of
the effectiveness and quality of the Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with
Disabilities program. These measures focus on the extent to which
projects provide high-quality products and services, the relevance of
project products and services to educational and early intervention
policy and practice, and the use of products and services to improve
educational and early intervention policy and practice.
Grantees will be required to report information on their project's
performance in annual reports to the Department (34 CFR 75.590).
5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.253, the extent to which a
grantee has made ``substantial progress toward meeting the objectives
in its approved application.'' This consideration includes the review
of a grantee's progress in meeting the targets and projected outcomes
in its approved application, and whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its approved application and
budget. In making a continuation grant, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Martin Eile, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4056, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2600. Telephone: (202) 245-7431.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the Federal Relay Service (FRS),
toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) by contacting
the Grants and Contracts Services Team, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2550.
Telephone: (202) 245-7363. If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the FRS,
toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: June 13, 2012.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-14942 Filed 6-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P