Alternative Personnel Management System (APMS) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 36485-36487 [2012-14918]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
that we would otherwise ordinarily
make under the statute.
Implementation
The methodological change detailed
above will be applied to future
administrative NME proceedings
involving merchandise from the PRC
and Vietnam initiated after publication
of this notice.
Dated: June 12, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–14964 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
[Docket Number 120531129–2129–01]
Alternative Personnel Management
System (APMS) at the National
Institute of Standards and Technology
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Modifications with
Request for Comment.
AGENCY:
This notice changes the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology’s (NIST) Alternative
Personnel Management System (APMS)
published October 21, 1997 (62 FR
54604, 54606), May 6, 2005 (70 FR
23996), July 15, 2008 (73 FR 40500), and
July 21, 2009 (74 FR 35841 and 74 FR
35843) to (1) eliminate the required
bonus for employees at the cap of their
pay band who are appraised at the top
two rating levels, and (2) solidify the
three-year probationary period, a
hallmark of the original NIST
demonstration project and later APMS.
DATES: This notice is effective on June
19, 2012. Comments will be accepted
until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 19,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments
to Amy K. Cubert, Supervisory Human
Resources Specialist, National Institute
of Standards and Technology, Building
101, Room A–123, 100 Bureau Drive
Mail Stop 1720, Gaithersburg, MD
20899–1720, Fax: (301) 948–6107 or
email comments to
ppschanges@nist.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions or comments, please contact
Amy K. Cubert at the National Institute
of Standards and Technology, (301)
975–3006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
Background
In accordance with Public Law 99–
574, the National Bureau of Standards
Authorization Act for fiscal year 1987,
the Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) approved a demonstration
project plan, ‘‘Alternative Personnel
Management System (APMS) at the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST),’’ and published the
plan in the Federal Register on October
2, 1987 (52 FR 37082). The published
demonstration project plan was
modified twice to clarify certain NIST
authorities (54 FR 21331 of May 17,
1989, and 55 FR 39220 of September 25,
1990). The project plan and subsequent
amendments were consolidated in the
final APMS plan, which became
permanent on October 21, 1997 (62 FR
54604). NIST published three
subsequent amendments to the final
APMS plan: One on May 6, 2005 (70 FR
23996), which became effective upon
publication in the Federal Register; one
on July 15, 2008 (73 FR 40500), which
became effective on October 1, 2008;
and one on July 21, 2009 (74 FR 35841),
which became effective upon
publication in the Federal Register.
NIST also published a correction on July
21, 2009 (74 FR 35843), which became
effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.
The final APMS plan, as amended,
provides for modifications to be made as
experience is gained, results are
analyzed, and conclusions are reached
on how the system is working. This
notice formally modifies the APMS plan
to (1) eliminate the mandatory
minimum bonus for pay-capped
employees receiving either a Superior
Contributor or Exceptional Contributor
rating of record, and (2) to solidify the
three-year probationary period, a feature
of the original demonstration project
and subsequent Alternative Personnel
Management System, for employees in
the Scientific and Engineering career
path hired into the Excepted and
Competitive Service. Comments will be
considered and any changes deemed
necessary will be made.
Dated: June 13, 2012.
David Robinson,
Associate Director for Management
Resources.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Basis for APMS Plan Modification
III. Changes to the APMS Plan
I. Executive Summary
The National Institute of Standards
and Technology’s (NIST) Alternative
Personnel Management System (APMS)
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36485
is designed to: (1) Improve hiring and
allow NIST to compete more effectively
for high-quality researchers through
direct hiring, selective use of higherentry salaries, and selective use of
recruiting allowances; (2) motivate and
retain staff through higher pay potential,
a pay-for-performance system, more
responsive personnel systems, and
selective use of retention allowances; (3)
strengthen the manager’s role in
personnel management through
delegation of personnel authorities; and
(4) increase the efficiency of personnel
systems through installation of a
simpler and more flexible classification
system based on pay banding through
reduction of guidelines, steps, and
paperwork in classification, hiring, and
other personnel systems, and through
automation (52 FR 37082, October 2,
1987). Since implementing the APMS,
NIST is more competitive for talent, and
NIST managers report significantly more
authority to make decisions concerning
employee pay.
This amendment seeks to better
ensure fiscal responsibility and budget
accountability within the pay-forperformance component of the APMS. It
also seeks to ensure that management
has the ability to adequately evaluate its
scientific and engineering professional
employees for research results, which
may take longer than one year.
NIST’s APMS performance rating
system is a pay-for-performance system
in which eligible employees may
receive pay increases and bonuses based
on performance. Pay increases are based
on an annually determined percentage
of the mid-point salary for each pay
band in a career path and linked
directly to the top four performance
ratings. One of the characteristics of the
NIST APMS performance management
system is a required bonus for highperforming employees who cannot
receive a pay increase because they are
at the top of their pay band.
Specifically, salary-capped employees
receiving a Superior Contributor or
Exceptional Contributor rating must
receive a bonus at least equivalent to the
salary increase that they would have
received if their salaries were not
capped.
Another feature of NIST’s APMS is an
extended probationary period of up to
three years for employees in the
Scientific and Engineering career path
(classified as ‘‘ZP’’). The extended
probationary period was an original
component of the NIST Demonstration
Project and later in the APMS. The
purpose of the extended probationary
period was to allow more time to assess
scientific and engineering professionals
because research results can often be
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
36486
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
difficult to evaluate in one year. Since
the finalizing of the NIST APMS in
1997, the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided
two cases, Van Wersch v. Department of
Health & Human Services, 197 F.3d
1144 (Fed. Cir. 1999), and McCormick v.
Department of the Air Force, 307 F.3d
1339 (Fed. Cir. 2002), which affected
NIST’s ability to fully utilize its
extended probationary period.
This amendment modifies the APMS
Plan, which was last amended in July
2009. Specifically, NIST will eliminate
the mandatory minimum bonus for
employees who are appraised at the top
two rating levels, ‘‘Superior
Contributor’’ and ‘‘Exceptional
Contributor.’’ It will also identify waiver
language needed to retain the original
system feature of an extended
probationary period of up to three years
for employees in the Scientific and
Engineering career path hired into the
Excepted and Competitive Service.
NIST will continually monitor the
effectiveness of this amendment.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Basis for APMS Plan Modification
A. Performance Bonuses
The need to modify the current NIST
APMS Pay for Performance System
(PPS) surfaced in early 2011 after the
implementation of a two-year pay freeze
for Federal employees and the budget
crisis that was resolved to narrowly
avert a government shutdown. These
actions reinforced the uncertainty of the
budget for NIST, and, without
additional funding for bonuses and pay
increases, NIST realized that measures
had to be taken to ensure fiscal
responsibility in the application of its
PPS.
Subsequently, in June 2011, the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) and
the Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) issued a memorandum titled
‘‘Guidance on Awards for Fiscal Years
2011 and 2012,’’ 1 implementing
budgetary limits on monetary awards,
which had a significant impact on
NIST’s PPS. In response to these
limitations, in August 2011, the
Performance Management Board (PMB),
responsible for governing and
overseeing NIST’s APMS, decided to
exercise its authority and approved an
exception to normal procedures that
suspended the mandatory minimum
bonus for pay-capped employees who
received Exceptional Contributor and
Superior Contributor ratings in Fiscal
Year 2011. As a result, all performance
bonuses in FY11 were granted on a
discretionary basis, subject to
1 https://www.chcoc.gov/transmittals/
TransmittalDetails.aspx?TransmittalID=3997.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
management controls to ensure that
higher-rated employees in the same
career path and pay band received
commensurate bonuses.
In an effort to more closely align
NIST’s APMS performance system with
the Administration’s focus on fiscal
responsibility and careful management
of all resources, NIST is amending the
provisions of the APMS to remove the
requirement that a salary-capped
employee with an Exceptional
Contributor or Superior Contributor
rating must receive a bonus at least
equivalent to the salary increase that
would have been received if the
employee’s salary were not capped.
B. Three-Year Probationary Period
Since its inception in 1987, NIST has
had a provision, first in its OPMapproved Demonstration Project and
later in its approved APMS, for an
extended probationary period of up to
three years for employees in the
Scientific and Engineering career path
(ZP). Appropriate waivers of laws, rules,
and regulations were made at the time.
Since then, the Federal Circuit issued
two decisions (noted above) that
affected NIST’s ability to fully exercise
the extended probationary period. This
notice amends the APMS by identifying
the appropriate waivers to permit NIST
to apply an extended probationary
period of up to three years to employees
in the Scientific and Engineering career
path.
III. Changes in the APMS Plan
The APMS at NIST, published in the
Federal Register on October 21, 1997
(62 FR 54604), May 6, 2005 (70 FR
23996), July 15, 2008 (73 FR 40500), and
July 21, 2009 (74 FR 35841 and 74 FR
35843), is amended as follows:
1. Performance Bonuses: The
subsection titled ‘‘Performance
Bonuses’’ (70 FR 23996, 23999, May 6,
2005) is deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:
‘‘Performance Bonuses’’
Bonuses are the only cash awards
linked to the NIST APMS pay-forperformance system. They are awarded
at the end of the performance rating
period and may be granted in
conjunction with performance pay
increases. A pay pool manager may
award a bonus to any employee with a
performance rating of Contributor or
higher. A pay pool manager is a line
manager who manages his or her
organization’s pay increase and bonus
fund and has final decision authority
over the performance ratings and
bonuses of subordinate employees.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Authorities and Waiver of Laws
and Regulations Required: The
subsection titled ‘‘Authorities and
Waiver of Laws and Regulations
Required’’ (62 FR 54604, 54613, October
21, 1997) is deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:
‘‘Authorities and Waiver of Laws and
Regulations Required’’ Public Law
99–574 gave the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) the
authority to experiment with several
specific personnel system innovations
which are otherwise prohibited by law
and regulations. In addition to the
authorities granted by the original NIST
project legislation, the following
waivers of law and regulation are
included:
Title 5, U.S. Code
• Section 5304, Locality-based
comparability payments.
• Section 5333, Minimum rate for
new appointments.
• Section 5753–5754, except that
relocation bonuses under section 5753
continue to apply.
• Subchapter VI of Chapter 53 Grade
and Pay Retention, (To the extent
necessary to allow the following
modifications: (1) Pay retention does not
apply to reductions in pay caused solely
by geographic movement; and (2) pay
retention does not apply to conversions
to the General Schedule as long as the
employee’s total rate of pay is not
reduced).
• Section 7501(1), Adverse actions.
(waiving the language ‘‘or who has
completed 1 year of current continuous
employment in the same or similar
positions under other than a temporary
appointment limited to 1 year or less;’’
waived only for positions in the
Scientific and Engineering Career path).
• Sections 7511(a)(1)(ii),
7511(a)(1)(B), 7511(a)(1)(C)(ii), Adverse
actions (waived only for positions in the
Scientific and Engineering Career path).
• Section 7512(4), Adverse actions,
(To the extent necessary to allow the
following modifications: (1) Exclude
reductions in pay that are solely due to
recomputation upon geographic
movement; and (2) exclude conversions
to the General Schedule that do not
result in a reduction in the employee’s
total rate of pay).
Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
• Sections 315.801, Probationary
period; when required, (waived only for
positions in the Scientific and
Engineering Career path).
• Section 315.802, Length of
probationary period, (waived only for
positions in the Scientific and
Engineering Career path).
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
• Section 315.803(b), Agency action
during probationary period (general)
(waived only for positions in the
Scientific and Engineering Career path).
• Section 315.805, Termination of
probationers for conditions arising
before appointment (waived only for
positions in the Scientific and
Engineering Career path).
• Section 315.806, Appeal rights to
the Merit Systems Protection Board
(waived only for employees in the
Scientific and Engineering Career path
serving a probationary or trial period).
• Section 351.401, Determining
Retention Standing.
• Section 351.402, Competitive area
in RIF.
• Section 351.403, Competitive level
in RIF.
• Sections 351.504(a) and (d), Credit
for Performance.
• Section 351.701, Assignment
involving displacement.
• Section 531.203, Minimum rate for
new appointments.
• Part 575, Subpart A Recruitment
Bonuses.
• Part 575, Subpart C Retention
Allowances.
• Sections 752.401(c)(2),
752.401(c)(3), 752.401(c)(5), Coverage
(waived only for positions in the
Scientific and Engineering Career path).
Department Administrative Orders.
• Section 202–302, Employment in
the Excepted Service (waived to the
extent inconsistent with the APMS).
• Section 202–315, Probationary and
Trial Periods (waived to the extent
inconsistent with the APMS).
[FR Doc. 2012–14918 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries Convention
Vessel Information Family of Forms
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Tom Graham, 808–944–2219
or Tom.Graham@noaa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Abstract
This request is for an extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) has issued regulations under
authority of the Western and Central
Pacific Fisheries Convention
Implementation Act (WCPFCIA; 16
U.S.C. 6901 et seq.) to carry out the
obligations of the United States under
the Convention on the Conservation and
Management of Highly Migratory Fish
Stocks in the Western and Central
Pacific Ocean (Convention), including
implementing the decisions of the
Commission for the Conservation and
Management of Highly Migratory Fish
Stocks in the Western and Central
Pacific Ocean (Commission). The
regulations include requirements for the
owners or operators of U.S. vessels to:
(1) Apply for and obtain a WCPFC Area
Endorsement if the vessel is used for
fishing for highly migratory species on
the high seas in the Convention Area (50
CFR 300.212), and (2) complete and
submit a Foreign Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ) Form if the vessel is used for
fishing for highly migratory species in
the Convention Area in areas under the
jurisdiction of any nation other than the
United States (50 CFR 300.213).
The application for WCPFC Area
Endorsements calls for specified
information about the vessel and its
operator that is not already collected via
the application for high seas fishing
permits issued under 50 CFR 300.13.
The Foreign EEZ Form calls for
specified information about the vessel,
its owners and operators and any fishing
authorizations issued by other nations.
This information collected under the
two requirements is used by NOAA, the
U.S. Coast Guard, and the Commission
to monitor the size and composition of
the HMS fleets in the Convention Area
for compliance-related and scientific
purposes.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
36487
II. Method of Collection
Respondents must submit some of the
information by mail or in person via
paper forms, and have a choice of
submitting some of the information
electronically, by mail, or in person.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648–0595.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(extension of a currently approved
information collection).
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
63.
Estimated Time per Response:
WCPFC Area Endorsement Application,
60 minutes; Foreign EEZ Form, 90
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 69.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $63 in recordkeeping/reporting
costs.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 14, 2012.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–14852 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36485-36487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14918]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology
[Docket Number 120531129-2129-01]
Alternative Personnel Management System (APMS) at the National
Institute of Standards and Technology
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Modifications with Request for Comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice changes the National Institute of Standards and
Technology's (NIST) Alternative Personnel Management System (APMS)
published October 21, 1997 (62 FR 54604, 54606), May 6, 2005 (70 FR
23996), July 15, 2008 (73 FR 40500), and July 21, 2009 (74 FR 35841 and
74 FR 35843) to (1) eliminate the required bonus for employees at the
cap of their pay band who are appraised at the top two rating levels,
and (2) solidify the three-year probationary period, a hallmark of the
original NIST demonstration project and later APMS.
DATES: This notice is effective on June 19, 2012. Comments will be
accepted until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 19, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Amy K. Cubert, Supervisory Human
Resources Specialist, National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Building 101, Room A-123, 100 Bureau Drive Mail Stop 1720,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1720, Fax: (301) 948-6107 or email comments to
ppschanges@nist.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions or comments, please
contact Amy K. Cubert at the National Institute of Standards and
Technology, (301) 975-3006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In accordance with Public Law 99-574, the National Bureau of
Standards Authorization Act for fiscal year 1987, the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) approved a demonstration project plan,
``Alternative Personnel Management System (APMS) at the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),'' and published the plan
in the Federal Register on October 2, 1987 (52 FR 37082). The published
demonstration project plan was modified twice to clarify certain NIST
authorities (54 FR 21331 of May 17, 1989, and 55 FR 39220 of September
25, 1990). The project plan and subsequent amendments were consolidated
in the final APMS plan, which became permanent on October 21, 1997 (62
FR 54604). NIST published three subsequent amendments to the final APMS
plan: One on May 6, 2005 (70 FR 23996), which became effective upon
publication in the Federal Register; one on July 15, 2008 (73 FR
40500), which became effective on October 1, 2008; and one on July 21,
2009 (74 FR 35841), which became effective upon publication in the
Federal Register. NIST also published a correction on July 21, 2009 (74
FR 35843), which became effective upon publication in the Federal
Register.
The final APMS plan, as amended, provides for modifications to be
made as experience is gained, results are analyzed, and conclusions are
reached on how the system is working. This notice formally modifies the
APMS plan to (1) eliminate the mandatory minimum bonus for pay-capped
employees receiving either a Superior Contributor or Exceptional
Contributor rating of record, and (2) to solidify the three-year
probationary period, a feature of the original demonstration project
and subsequent Alternative Personnel Management System, for employees
in the Scientific and Engineering career path hired into the Excepted
and Competitive Service. Comments will be considered and any changes
deemed necessary will be made.
Dated: June 13, 2012.
David Robinson,
Associate Director for Management Resources.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Basis for APMS Plan Modification
III. Changes to the APMS Plan
I. Executive Summary
The National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST)
Alternative Personnel Management System (APMS) is designed to: (1)
Improve hiring and allow NIST to compete more effectively for high-
quality researchers through direct hiring, selective use of higher-
entry salaries, and selective use of recruiting allowances; (2)
motivate and retain staff through higher pay potential, a pay-for-
performance system, more responsive personnel systems, and selective
use of retention allowances; (3) strengthen the manager's role in
personnel management through delegation of personnel authorities; and
(4) increase the efficiency of personnel systems through installation
of a simpler and more flexible classification system based on pay
banding through reduction of guidelines, steps, and paperwork in
classification, hiring, and other personnel systems, and through
automation (52 FR 37082, October 2, 1987). Since implementing the APMS,
NIST is more competitive for talent, and NIST managers report
significantly more authority to make decisions concerning employee pay.
This amendment seeks to better ensure fiscal responsibility and
budget accountability within the pay-for-performance component of the
APMS. It also seeks to ensure that management has the ability to
adequately evaluate its scientific and engineering professional
employees for research results, which may take longer than one year.
NIST's APMS performance rating system is a pay-for-performance
system in which eligible employees may receive pay increases and
bonuses based on performance. Pay increases are based on an annually
determined percentage of the mid-point salary for each pay band in a
career path and linked directly to the top four performance ratings.
One of the characteristics of the NIST APMS performance management
system is a required bonus for high-performing employees who cannot
receive a pay increase because they are at the top of their pay band.
Specifically, salary-capped employees receiving a Superior Contributor
or Exceptional Contributor rating must receive a bonus at least
equivalent to the salary increase that they would have received if
their salaries were not capped.
Another feature of NIST's APMS is an extended probationary period
of up to three years for employees in the Scientific and Engineering
career path (classified as ``ZP''). The extended probationary period
was an original component of the NIST Demonstration Project and later
in the APMS. The purpose of the extended probationary period was to
allow more time to assess scientific and engineering professionals
because research results can often be
[[Page 36486]]
difficult to evaluate in one year. Since the finalizing of the NIST
APMS in 1997, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit decided two cases, Van Wersch v. Department of Health & Human
Services, 197 F.3d 1144 (Fed. Cir. 1999), and McCormick v. Department
of the Air Force, 307 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2002), which affected NIST's
ability to fully utilize its extended probationary period.
This amendment modifies the APMS Plan, which was last amended in
July 2009. Specifically, NIST will eliminate the mandatory minimum
bonus for employees who are appraised at the top two rating levels,
``Superior Contributor'' and ``Exceptional Contributor.'' It will also
identify waiver language needed to retain the original system feature
of an extended probationary period of up to three years for employees
in the Scientific and Engineering career path hired into the Excepted
and Competitive Service. NIST will continually monitor the
effectiveness of this amendment.
II. Basis for APMS Plan Modification
A. Performance Bonuses
The need to modify the current NIST APMS Pay for Performance System
(PPS) surfaced in early 2011 after the implementation of a two-year pay
freeze for Federal employees and the budget crisis that was resolved to
narrowly avert a government shutdown. These actions reinforced the
uncertainty of the budget for NIST, and, without additional funding for
bonuses and pay increases, NIST realized that measures had to be taken
to ensure fiscal responsibility in the application of its PPS.
Subsequently, in June 2011, the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a memorandum
titled ``Guidance on Awards for Fiscal Years 2011 and 2012,'' \1\
implementing budgetary limits on monetary awards, which had a
significant impact on NIST's PPS. In response to these limitations, in
August 2011, the Performance Management Board (PMB), responsible for
governing and overseeing NIST's APMS, decided to exercise its authority
and approved an exception to normal procedures that suspended the
mandatory minimum bonus for pay-capped employees who received
Exceptional Contributor and Superior Contributor ratings in Fiscal Year
2011. As a result, all performance bonuses in FY11 were granted on a
discretionary basis, subject to management controls to ensure that
higher-rated employees in the same career path and pay band received
commensurate bonuses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.chcoc.gov/transmittals/TransmittalDetails.aspx?TransmittalID=3997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an effort to more closely align NIST's APMS performance system
with the Administration's focus on fiscal responsibility and careful
management of all resources, NIST is amending the provisions of the
APMS to remove the requirement that a salary-capped employee with an
Exceptional Contributor or Superior Contributor rating must receive a
bonus at least equivalent to the salary increase that would have been
received if the employee's salary were not capped.
B. Three-Year Probationary Period
Since its inception in 1987, NIST has had a provision, first in its
OPM-approved Demonstration Project and later in its approved APMS, for
an extended probationary period of up to three years for employees in
the Scientific and Engineering career path (ZP). Appropriate waivers of
laws, rules, and regulations were made at the time. Since then, the
Federal Circuit issued two decisions (noted above) that affected NIST's
ability to fully exercise the extended probationary period. This notice
amends the APMS by identifying the appropriate waivers to permit NIST
to apply an extended probationary period of up to three years to
employees in the Scientific and Engineering career path.
III. Changes in the APMS Plan
The APMS at NIST, published in the Federal Register on October 21,
1997 (62 FR 54604), May 6, 2005 (70 FR 23996), July 15, 2008 (73 FR
40500), and July 21, 2009 (74 FR 35841 and 74 FR 35843), is amended as
follows:
1. Performance Bonuses: The subsection titled ``Performance
Bonuses'' (70 FR 23996, 23999, May 6, 2005) is deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following:
``Performance Bonuses''
Bonuses are the only cash awards linked to the NIST APMS pay-for-
performance system. They are awarded at the end of the performance
rating period and may be granted in conjunction with performance pay
increases. A pay pool manager may award a bonus to any employee with a
performance rating of Contributor or higher. A pay pool manager is a
line manager who manages his or her organization's pay increase and
bonus fund and has final decision authority over the performance
ratings and bonuses of subordinate employees.''
2. Authorities and Waiver of Laws and Regulations Required: The
subsection titled ``Authorities and Waiver of Laws and Regulations
Required'' (62 FR 54604, 54613, October 21, 1997) is deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following:
``Authorities and Waiver of Laws and Regulations Required'' Public
Law 99-574 gave the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) the authority to experiment with several specific personnel
system innovations which are otherwise prohibited by law and
regulations. In addition to the authorities granted by the original
NIST project legislation, the following waivers of law and regulation
are included:
Title 5, U.S. Code
Section 5304, Locality-based comparability payments.
Section 5333, Minimum rate for new appointments.
Section 5753-5754, except that relocation bonuses under
section 5753 continue to apply.
Subchapter VI of Chapter 53 Grade and Pay Retention, (To
the extent necessary to allow the following modifications: (1) Pay
retention does not apply to reductions in pay caused solely by
geographic movement; and (2) pay retention does not apply to
conversions to the General Schedule as long as the employee's total
rate of pay is not reduced).
Section 7501(1), Adverse actions. (waiving the language
``or who has completed 1 year of current continuous employment in the
same or similar positions under other than a temporary appointment
limited to 1 year or less;'' waived only for positions in the
Scientific and Engineering Career path).
Sections 7511(a)(1)(ii), 7511(a)(1)(B), 7511(a)(1)(C)(ii),
Adverse actions (waived only for positions in the Scientific and
Engineering Career path).
Section 7512(4), Adverse actions, (To the extent necessary
to allow the following modifications: (1) Exclude reductions in pay
that are solely due to recomputation upon geographic movement; and (2)
exclude conversions to the General Schedule that do not result in a
reduction in the employee's total rate of pay).
Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
Sections 315.801, Probationary period; when required,
(waived only for positions in the Scientific and Engineering Career
path).
Section 315.802, Length of probationary period, (waived
only for positions in the Scientific and Engineering Career path).
[[Page 36487]]
Section 315.803(b), Agency action during probationary
period (general) (waived only for positions in the Scientific and
Engineering Career path).
Section 315.805, Termination of probationers for
conditions arising before appointment (waived only for positions in the
Scientific and Engineering Career path).
Section 315.806, Appeal rights to the Merit Systems
Protection Board (waived only for employees in the Scientific and
Engineering Career path serving a probationary or trial period).
Section 351.401, Determining Retention Standing.
Section 351.402, Competitive area in RIF.
Section 351.403, Competitive level in RIF.
Sections 351.504(a) and (d), Credit for Performance.
Section 351.701, Assignment involving displacement.
Section 531.203, Minimum rate for new appointments.
Part 575, Subpart A Recruitment Bonuses.
Part 575, Subpart C Retention Allowances.
Sections 752.401(c)(2), 752.401(c)(3), 752.401(c)(5),
Coverage (waived only for positions in the Scientific and Engineering
Career path). Department Administrative Orders.
Section 202-302, Employment in the Excepted Service
(waived to the extent inconsistent with the APMS).
Section 202-315, Probationary and Trial Periods (waived to
the extent inconsistent with the APMS).
[FR Doc. 2012-14918 Filed 6-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P