Certain Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, Including Power Over Ethernet Telephones, Switches, Wireless Access Points, Routers and Other Devices Used in LANS, and Cameras; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 36291-36292 [2012-14750]

Download as PDF 36291 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2012 / Notices confidential information regarding significant caves. The information collected enables the BLM to comply with the Federal Cave Resources Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 4301–4310). Frequency of Collection: On occasion. Estimated Number and Description of Respondents: 100 individuals and households. Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping ‘‘Hour’’ Burden: 1090 hours. Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’ Burden: None. The following table details the individual components and respective hour burdens of this information collection request: B. Number of responses A. Type of response C. Time per response D. Total hours (B × C) Cave Nomination ......................................................................................................................... Request for Confidential Cave Information ................................................................................. 90 10 12 1 1,080 10 Totals ............................................................................................................................. 100 ........................ 1,090 Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other person identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your person identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Jean Sonneman, Bureau of Land Management, Information Collection Clearance Officer. Colorado, were accepted and filed on May 25, 2012. Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado. [FR Doc. 2012–14792 Filed 6–15–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–817] [LLCO956000 L14200000.BJ0000] Certain Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, Including Power Over Ethernet Telephones, Switches, Wireless Access Points, Routers and Other Devices Used in LANS, and Cameras; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation Notice of Filing of Plats AGENCY: [FR Doc. 2012–14675 Filed 6–15–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–84–P DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats; Colorado. AGENCY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is publishing this notice to inform the public of the filing of the land survey plats listed below. DATES: The plats described in this notice were filed on May 25, 2012. ADDRESSES: BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215– 7093. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado, (303) 239–3856. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The plat, in 3 sheets, and field notes of the dependent survey and resurvey in Fractional Township 10 South, Range 103 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:02 Jun 15, 2012 Jkt 226001 U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) granting the Complainant’s motion to amend the complaint and the Notice of Investigation. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda S. Pitcher, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on December 7, 2011, based on a complaint filed by ChriMar Systems, Inc. d/b/a DMS Technologies (‘‘ChriMar’’) of Farmington Hills, Michigan, alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain communication equipment, components thereof, and products containing the same, including power over ethernet telephones, switches, wireless access points, routers and other devices used in LANs, and cameras. 76 FR 76,436–37 (Dec. 7, 2011). The complaint alleges infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,457,250 (‘‘the ’250 patent’’). The first amended complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The Notice of Investigation names a plurality of respondents. On May 14, 2012, the ALJ issued an ID granting ChriMar’s motion to amend the complaint and Notice of Investigation. Order No. 10 at 7. ChriMar sought to add additional facts to the complaint and to amend the Notice of Investigation to add the underlined portion of the following language: ‘‘whether an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection(a)(2) of section 337.’’ Id. at 1, 3, 7. The ALJ found that there is good E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1 36292 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2012 / Notices cause to amend the complaint and Notice of Investigation. Id. at 7. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)). BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Cooperative Research Group on Particle Sensor Performance and Durability Notice is hereby given that, on May 23, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on Particle Sensor Performance and Durability (‘‘PSPD’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Caterpillar, Inc., Peoria, IL; Electricfil Automotive, Miribel Cedex, FRANCE; MTU Friedrichshafen GMBH, Friedrichshafen, GERMANY; Emisense Technologies, LLC, San Juan Capistrano, CA; NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd., Nagoya, JAPAN; Isuzu Manufacturing Services of America, Inc., Plymouth, MI; and Navistar, Inc., Melrose Park, IL. The general area of PSPD’s planned activity is to critically investigate the performance and durability of various particle sensor technologies on a diesel engine platform. State-of-the-art laboratory particle equipment will be employed for this investigation. PSPD will capitalize on its know-how and experience in this area to provide an Jkt 226001 Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [OMB Number 1110–0021] [FR Doc. 2012–14769 Filed 6–15–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice is hereby given that, on May 30, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Border Security Technology Consortium (‘‘BSTC’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA; DRS Tactical Systems, Inc., Melbourne, FL; Vista Research, Arlington, VA; Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp., Boulder, CO; List Innovative Solutions, Inc., Herndon, VA; Arc Aspicio, Arlington, VA; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Rapiscan Systems, Torrence, CA; and ICS Consulting, LLC, Arlington, VA. The general area of BSTC’s planned activity is (i) to develop various border security-related monitoring, surveillance, communications, fencing and infrastructure, and other supporting technologies that advance the state-ofthe-art; (ii) to improve U.S. industry, government and academia capabilities to sustain U.S. border protection in the research, development, engineering and production of border security-related systems; and (iii) to insert these technologies into legacy and development platforms as quickly and efficiently as possible. Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2012–14766 Filed 6–15–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–P PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Federal Bureau of Investigation Proposed Collection, Comments Requested: FBI National Academy Level III Evaluation; FBI National Academy Post-Course Questionnaire for Graduates, FBI National Academy Post-Course Questionnaire for Supervisors of Graduates 60-Day notice of information collection under review. ACTION: Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Border Security Technology Consortium [FR Doc. 2012–14750 Filed 6–15–12; 8:45 am] 17:02 Jun 15, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division By order of the Commission. Issued: June 12, 2012. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. VerDate Mar<15>2010 impartial evaluation that all participants can benefit from. The program will run over a two-year period. Sfmt 4703 The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Training Division’s Office of Technology, Research, and Curriculum Development (OTRCD) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until August 17, 2012. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments (especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time), suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Laleatha B. Goode, Management and Program Analyst for the Evaluation Program, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Training Division, Curriculum Planning and Support Unit, FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia 22135 or facsimile at (703) 632–3111. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following three points: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency/component, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s/component’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of the information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36291-36292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14750]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-817]


Certain Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products 
Containing the Same, Including Power Over Ethernet Telephones, 
Switches, Wireless Access Points, Routers and Other Devices Used in 
LANS, and Cameras; Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 10) 
granting the Complainant's motion to amend the complaint and the Notice 
of Investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda S. Pitcher, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on December 7, 2011, based on a complaint filed by ChriMar Systems, 
Inc. d/b/a DMS Technologies (``ChriMar'') of Farmington Hills, 
Michigan, alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation into 
the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the 
United States after importation of certain communication equipment, 
components thereof, and products containing the same, including power 
over ethernet telephones, switches, wireless access points, routers and 
other devices used in LANs, and cameras. 76 FR 76,436-37 (Dec. 7, 
2011). The complaint alleges infringement of certain claims of U.S. 
Patent No. 7,457,250 (``the '250 patent''). The first amended complaint 
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as 
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The Notice of 
Investigation names a plurality of respondents.
    On May 14, 2012, the ALJ issued an ID granting ChriMar's motion to 
amend the complaint and Notice of Investigation. Order No. 10 at 7. 
ChriMar sought to add additional facts to the complaint and to amend 
the Notice of Investigation to add the underlined portion of the 
following language: ``whether an industry in the United States exists 
or is in the process of being established as required by 
subsection(a)(2) of section 337.'' Id. at 1, 3, 7. The ALJ found that 
there is good

[[Page 36292]]

cause to amend the complaint and Notice of Investigation. Id. at 7. No 
petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to 
review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: June 12, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-14750 Filed 6-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.