Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 35473-35475 [2012-14413]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 13, 2012 / Notices
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
in this notice and the accompanying
Substantiation Documentation reflect
CEQ’s comments and suggestions.
FRA is making the Substantiation
Document available on FRA’s Web site
https://www.fra.dot.gov/rpd/passenger/
33.shtml for public review and
comment for a period of 30 days
running concurrently with this notice.
After the 30 day comment period, FRA
will consider comments received and
make any necessary changes to address
substantive issues raised by the public.
III. Proposed Categorical Exclusions
FRA is proposing to add the following
seven CEs to section 4(c) of FRA’s
Environmental Procedures as follows:
(21) Alterations to existing facilities,
locomotives, stations and rail cars in
order to make them accessible for the
elderly and persons with disabilities,
such as modifying doorways, adding or
modifying lifts, constructing access
ramps and railings, modifying
restrooms, or constructing accessible
platforms.
(22) Bridge rehabilitation,
reconstruction or replacement, and the
construction of bridges, culverts, and
grade separation projects,
predominantly within existing right-ofway and that do not involve extensive
in-water construction activities, such as
projects replacing bridge components
including stringers, caps, piles, or
decks, the construction of roadway
overpasses to replace at-grade crossings,
or construction or replacement of short
span bridges.
(23) Acquisition (including purchase
or lease), rehabilitation, or maintenance
of vehicles and equipment that does not
cause a substantial increase in the use
of infrastructure within the existing
right-of-way or other previously
disturbed locations, including
locomotives, passenger coaches, freight
cars, trainsets, and construction,
maintenance or inspection equipment.
(24) Installation, repair and
replacement of equipment and small
structures designed to promote
transportation safety, security,
accessibility, communication or
operational efficiency that take place
predominantly within the existing rightof-way and do not result in a major
change in traffic density on the existing
rail line or facility, such as the
installation, repair or replacement of
surface treatments or pavement
markings, small passenger shelters,
railroad warning devices, train control
systems, signalization, electric traction
equipment and structures, electronics,
photonics, and communications systems
and equipment, equipment mounts,
towers and structures, information
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Jun 12, 2012
Jkt 226001
processing equipment, or security
equipment, including surveillance and
detection cameras.
(25) Environmental restoration,
remediation and pollution prevention
activities in or proximate to existing and
former railroad track, infrastructure,
stations and facilities, including
activities such as noise mitigation,
landscaping, natural resource
management activities, replacement or
improvement to storm water systems,
installation of pollution containment
systems, slope stabilization, and
contaminated soil removal in
conformance with applicable
regulations and permitting
requirements.
(26) Assembly and construction of
facilities and stations that are consistent
with existing land use and zoning
requirements, do not result in a major
change in traffic density on existing rail
or highway facilities and result in
approximately less than 10 acres of
surface disturbance, such as storage and
maintenance facilities, freight or
passenger loading and unloading
facilities or stations, parking facilities,
passenger platforms, canopies, shelters,
pedestrian overpasses or underpasses,
paving, or landscaping.
(27) Track and track structure
maintenance and improvements when
carried out predominantly within the
existing right-of-way and that do not
cause a substantial increase in rail
traffic beyond existing or historic levels,
such as stabilizing embankments,
installing or reinstalling track, regrading, replacing rail, ties, slabs and
ballast, improving or replacing
interlockings, or the installation or
maintenance of ancillary equipment.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 5, 2012.
Joseph C. Szabo,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012–14414 Filed 6–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0066]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed revision of the previously
approved collection of information.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35473
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before seeking
OMB approval, Federal agencies must
solicit public comment on proposed
collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of
previously approved collections.
This document describes an
Information Collection Request (ICR) for
which NHTSA intends to seek OMB
approval.
Comments must be submitted on
or before August 13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2012–0066 using any of the
following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
Docket number for the Notice. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Hinch, Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative, Office of
Behavioral Safety Research (NTI–132),
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE., W46–500, Washington, DC 20590.
Mary Hinch’s phone number is 202–
366–5595 and her email address is
mary.hinch@dot.gov.
DATES:
Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
35474
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 13, 2012 / Notices
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
collection of information:
Title: NHTSA Distracted Driving
Survey Project.
Type of Request: Revision of
previously approved collection of
information.
OMB Clearance Number: 2127–0665.
Form Number: NHTSA Form 1084.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: 3 years from date of approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to conduct awareness surveys
to evaluate two traffic safety programs
designed to reduce distracted driving.
One program will focus on hand-held
phone use and be conducted statewide
in two States. If clearance is granted, the
awareness surveys would be conducted
in-person before and after four program
waves. Over the program period, 40,000
people would be surveyed, 20,000 in
each State. The other program will focus
on texting behavior and be conducted at
the community level in two States. If
clearance is granted, the awareness
surveys would either be conducted inperson or by telephone before and after
four program waves. Surveys would be
conducted in two communities in each
State. Over the program period, 20,000
people would be surveyed, 10,000 in
each State. Estimated interview length
would be approximately 10 minutes for
each survey. Information on attitudes,
awareness, knowledge, and behavior
would be collected through both
surveys.
A Spanish-language translation and
bilingual interviewers would be used to
minimize language barriers to
participation. Additionally, the
proposed surveys would be anonymous;
the surveys would not collect any
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Jun 12, 2012
Jkt 226001
personal information that would allow
anyone to identify respondents.
Participant names would not be
collected during the interview. For the
telephone surveys, the telephone
number used to reach the respondent
would be separated from their responses
prior to entry into the analytical
database. In addition, for the telephone
surveys, the interviewers would use
computer-assisted telephone
interviewing to reduce interview length
and minimize recording errors.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: NHTSA was established by
the Highway Safety Act of l970 (23
U.S.C. 101) to carry out a Congressional
mandate to reduce the mounting
number of deaths, injuries, and
economic losses resulting from motor
vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards
and traffic safety programs. According
to the Overview of NHTSA’s Driver
Distraction Program (see
distraction.gov), research suggests that
driving distracted may degrade driver
performance by imposing additional
workload on the driver. As summarized
in the overview, distraction may result
in reduced eye scanning behavior,
slower reaction time, degraded vehicle
control, and lower detection of objects
in peripheral vision.
Driving distracted may influence the
likelihood of a crash. This supports the
need for strong evaluation efforts to
identify what interventions are effective
at reducing distracted driving. In this
effort, NHTSA proposes to conduct
information collections to assess the
effectiveness of two traffic safety
programs designed to reduce distracted
driving. The programs will use waves of
public media and enhanced
enforcement activity to increase the
perceived likelihood of getting a ticket
for driving distracted and, consequently,
decrease the occurrence of distracted
driving behavior. NHTSA would like to
conduct public awareness surveys to
gather information from the driving
public regarding their experience of the
programs, including their awareness,
perception, and knowledge of the
programs. An essential part of these
evaluation efforts is to compare baseline
and post-program measures to
determine if the programs contribute to
changes in participant responses;
therefore, multiple measurements
would be required.
The findings from these two proposed
information collections would build on
existing knowledge. In 2010 and 2011,
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NHTSA conducted a high visibility
enforcement program in Hartford,
Connecticut and Syracuse, New York
using enhanced enforcement and the
media campaign, Phone in One Hand,
Ticket in the Other, to reduce distracted
driving behavior. The program
demonstrated that this could be done at
the community level, exhibited by
decreases in both observed hand-held
phone use and electronic device
manipulation (e.g., texting). The next
major step is to demonstrate how this
program can be implemented statewide.
NHTSA will be taking this step through
a statewide distracted driving
demonstration program. The findings
from the first proposed information
collection would provide a fuller
understanding of this process. The CT
NY program revealed challenges in
enforcing distracted driving laws,
especially with texting behavior, which
can be performed below the line of
sight. It is valuable to develop and test
enforcement strategies to determine the
ones that are effective. NHTSA will be
testing enforcement strategies through a
high visibility enforcement texting
program. The findings from the second
proposed information collection would
provide insight into the effectiveness of
the strategies.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information): NHTSA
intends to collect data from 60,000
drivers to conduct awareness surveys
for two separate distracted driving
evaluation efforts. The distracted
driving program focused on hand-held
phone use will be conducted statewide
in two States. If clearance is granted,
awareness surveys would be
administered in-person to a population
18 years and older, before and after four
program waves. Surveys would be
conducted at 10 sites in each State and
250 surveys would be administered at
each site per measurement period. Over
4 waves (i.e., 8 measurement periods),
40,000 people would be surveyed in
both States (20,000 in each State). (Two
States * 10 locations in each State * 250
surveys per measurement period * 8
measurement periods = 40,000 total
surveys.)
The distracted driving program
focused on texting behavior will be
conducted at the community level in
two States. If clearance is granted,
awareness surveys would be
administered in-person or by telephone
to a population 18 years and older,
before and after four program waves.
Surveys would be conducted in two
communities in each State. For the very
first and very last measurement periods,
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 13, 2012 / Notices
1,000 surveys would be conducted. This
would be done to increase the power
required to measure change. For all
other measurement periods, 500 surveys
would be conducted. Over 4 waves (i.e.,
8 measurement periods), 10,000 people
would be surveyed in each State (20,000
people would be surveyed in both
States). (Two States * 2 communities in
each State * (2 measurement periods *
1,000 surveys) + (6 measurement
periods * 500) = 20,000 surveys.)
For the telephone surveys, interviews
would be conducted with persons at
both residential phone numbers and cell
phone numbers. Systematic sampling
procedures would include Random
Digit Dial sampling techniques. Federal
law prohibits the use of auto dialing to
call cell phones; therefore all cell phone
numbers would be dialed manually. For
interviews conducted with persons
using landline phones, no more than
one respondent per household would be
selected. For interviews conducted with
persons on cell phones, a single user of
the cell phone would be selected. Each
sample member would complete just
one interview. Businesses are ineligible
for the sample and would not be
interviewed.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of
Information: For the statewide handheld program, NHTSA estimates
interviews would require an average of
10 minutes to complete or a total of
6,667 hours for the 40,000 respondents.
For the community texting program,
NHTSA estimates interviews would
require an average of 10 minutes to
complete or a total of 3,333 hours for the
20,000 respondents. Thus, for both
proposed surveys, the total time burden
on the general public would be 10,000
hours. The respondents would not incur
any reporting cost from the information
collection. The respondents also would
not incur any record keeping burden or
recordkeeping cost from the information
collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Issued on: June 8, 2012.
Jeffrey Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2012–14413 Filed 6–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35621]
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
Jkt 226001
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
DOT.
ACTION:
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Regulation Project
Notice of exemption.
The Board is granting an
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502, from
the prior approval requirements of 49
U.S.C. 11323–25 for Genesee &
Wyoming Inc. (GWI), a noncarrier, to
continue in control of Columbus &
Chattahoochee Railroad, Inc. (CCR),
upon CCR’s becoming a Class III rail
carrier in a related transaction involving
the lease from Norfolk Southern
Railway Company (NSR), and operation
of, a 25.50-mile rail line between Girard
and Mahrt, Ala.,1 subject to labor
protective conditions. GWI is a holding
company that directly or indirectly
controls one Class II rail carrier and 59
Class III rail carriers. The NSR line that
CCR will lease and operate indirectly
connects with Georgia Southwestern
Railroad, Inc. (GSWR), a Class III carrier
controlled by GWI.
SUMMARY:
This exemption will be effective
on July 1, 2012. Petitions for stay must
be filed by June 19, 2012. Petitions to
reopen must be filed by June 25, 2012.
DATES:
Send an original and 10
copies of all pleadings referring to
Docket No. FD 35621, to: Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, send one copy of pleadings to
Eric M. Hocky, Thorp Reed &
Armstrong, LLP, One Commerce Square,
2005 Market Street, Suite 1000,
Philadelphia, PA 19103.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathon Binet, (202) 245–0368.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
(800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Additional information is contained in
the Board’s decision, which is available
on our Web site at www.stb.dot.gov.
1 See Columbus & Chattahoochee R.R.—Lease &
Operation Exemption—Norfolk S. Ry., FD 35620
(STB served May 11, 2012).
14:45 Jun 12, 2012
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner
Begeman.
Derrick A. Gardner,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2012–14423 Filed 6–12–12; 8:45 am]
Genesee & Wyoming Inc.—
Continuance in Control Exemption—
Columbus & Chattahoochee Railroad,
Inc.
Decided: June 7, 2012.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
35475
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is
soliciting comments concerning
substantiation requirement for certain
contributions.
SUMMARY:
Written comments should be
received on or before August 13, 2012
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Yvette Lawrence, Internal Revenue
Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this regulation should be
directed to Allan Hopkins, at (202) 622–
6665, or at Internal Revenue Service,
room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20224, or through
the Internet, at
Allan.M.Hopkins@irs.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Substantiation Requirement for
Certain Contributions.
OMB Number: 1545–1431.
Regulation Project Number: IA–74–93
(Final).
Abstract: These regulations provide
that, for purposes of substantiation for
certain charitable contributions,
consideration does not include de
minimis goods or services. It also
provides guidance on how taxpayers
may satisfy the substantiation
requirement for contributions of $250 or
more.
Current Actions: There is no change to
this existing regulation.
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35473-35475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14413]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0066]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed revision of the
previously approved collection of information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and reinstatements of previously
approved collections.
This document describes an Information Collection Request (ICR) for
which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-2012-0066 using any of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251
Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
Docket number for the Notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Hinch, Contracting Officer's
Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NTI-
132), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Ave. SE., W46-500, Washington, DC 20590. Mary Hinch's phone number is
202-366-5595 and her email address is mary.hinch@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
[[Page 35474]]
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed collection of information:
Title: NHTSA Distracted Driving Survey Project.
Type of Request: Revision of previously approved collection of
information.
OMB Clearance Number: 2127-0665.
Form Number: NHTSA Form 1084.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to conduct awareness
surveys to evaluate two traffic safety programs designed to reduce
distracted driving. One program will focus on hand-held phone use and
be conducted statewide in two States. If clearance is granted, the
awareness surveys would be conducted in-person before and after four
program waves. Over the program period, 40,000 people would be
surveyed, 20,000 in each State. The other program will focus on texting
behavior and be conducted at the community level in two States. If
clearance is granted, the awareness surveys would either be conducted
in-person or by telephone before and after four program waves. Surveys
would be conducted in two communities in each State. Over the program
period, 20,000 people would be surveyed, 10,000 in each State.
Estimated interview length would be approximately 10 minutes for each
survey. Information on attitudes, awareness, knowledge, and behavior
would be collected through both surveys.
A Spanish-language translation and bilingual interviewers would be
used to minimize language barriers to participation. Additionally, the
proposed surveys would be anonymous; the surveys would not collect any
personal information that would allow anyone to identify respondents.
Participant names would not be collected during the interview. For the
telephone surveys, the telephone number used to reach the respondent
would be separated from their responses prior to entry into the
analytical database. In addition, for the telephone surveys, the
interviewers would use computer-assisted telephone interviewing to
reduce interview length and minimize recording errors.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: NHTSA was established by the Highway Safety Act of l970
(23 U.S.C. 101) to carry out a Congressional mandate to reduce the
mounting number of deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation's highways. As part of this
statutory mandate, NHTSA is authorized to conduct research as a
foundation for the development of motor vehicle standards and traffic
safety programs. According to the Overview of NHTSA's Driver
Distraction Program (see distraction.gov), research suggests that
driving distracted may degrade driver performance by imposing
additional workload on the driver. As summarized in the overview,
distraction may result in reduced eye scanning behavior, slower
reaction time, degraded vehicle control, and lower detection of objects
in peripheral vision.
Driving distracted may influence the likelihood of a crash. This
supports the need for strong evaluation efforts to identify what
interventions are effective at reducing distracted driving. In this
effort, NHTSA proposes to conduct information collections to assess the
effectiveness of two traffic safety programs designed to reduce
distracted driving. The programs will use waves of public media and
enhanced enforcement activity to increase the perceived likelihood of
getting a ticket for driving distracted and, consequently, decrease the
occurrence of distracted driving behavior. NHTSA would like to conduct
public awareness surveys to gather information from the driving public
regarding their experience of the programs, including their awareness,
perception, and knowledge of the programs. An essential part of these
evaluation efforts is to compare baseline and post-program measures to
determine if the programs contribute to changes in participant
responses; therefore, multiple measurements would be required.
The findings from these two proposed information collections would
build on existing knowledge. In 2010 and 2011, NHTSA conducted a high
visibility enforcement program in Hartford, Connecticut and Syracuse,
New York using enhanced enforcement and the media campaign, Phone in
One Hand, Ticket in the Other, to reduce distracted driving behavior.
The program demonstrated that this could be done at the community
level, exhibited by decreases in both observed hand-held phone use and
electronic device manipulation (e.g., texting). The next major step is
to demonstrate how this program can be implemented statewide. NHTSA
will be taking this step through a statewide distracted driving
demonstration program. The findings from the first proposed information
collection would provide a fuller understanding of this process. The CT
NY program revealed challenges in enforcing distracted driving laws,
especially with texting behavior, which can be performed below the line
of sight. It is valuable to develop and test enforcement strategies to
determine the ones that are effective. NHTSA will be testing
enforcement strategies through a high visibility enforcement texting
program. The findings from the second proposed information collection
would provide insight into the effectiveness of the strategies.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information):
NHTSA intends to collect data from 60,000 drivers to conduct awareness
surveys for two separate distracted driving evaluation efforts. The
distracted driving program focused on hand-held phone use will be
conducted statewide in two States. If clearance is granted, awareness
surveys would be administered in-person to a population 18 years and
older, before and after four program waves. Surveys would be conducted
at 10 sites in each State and 250 surveys would be administered at each
site per measurement period. Over 4 waves (i.e., 8 measurement
periods), 40,000 people would be surveyed in both States (20,000 in
each State). (Two States * 10 locations in each State * 250 surveys per
measurement period * 8 measurement periods = 40,000 total surveys.)
The distracted driving program focused on texting behavior will be
conducted at the community level in two States. If clearance is
granted, awareness surveys would be administered in-person or by
telephone to a population 18 years and older, before and after four
program waves. Surveys would be conducted in two communities in each
State. For the very first and very last measurement periods,
[[Page 35475]]
1,000 surveys would be conducted. This would be done to increase the
power required to measure change. For all other measurement periods,
500 surveys would be conducted. Over 4 waves (i.e., 8 measurement
periods), 10,000 people would be surveyed in each State (20,000 people
would be surveyed in both States). (Two States * 2 communities in each
State * (2 measurement periods * 1,000 surveys) + (6 measurement
periods * 500) = 20,000 surveys.)
For the telephone surveys, interviews would be conducted with
persons at both residential phone numbers and cell phone numbers.
Systematic sampling procedures would include Random Digit Dial sampling
techniques. Federal law prohibits the use of auto dialing to call cell
phones; therefore all cell phone numbers would be dialed manually. For
interviews conducted with persons using landline phones, no more than
one respondent per household would be selected. For interviews
conducted with persons on cell phones, a single user of the cell phone
would be selected. Each sample member would complete just one
interview. Businesses are ineligible for the sample and would not be
interviewed.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of Information: For the statewide hand-
held program, NHTSA estimates interviews would require an average of 10
minutes to complete or a total of 6,667 hours for the 40,000
respondents. For the community texting program, NHTSA estimates
interviews would require an average of 10 minutes to complete or a
total of 3,333 hours for the 20,000 respondents. Thus, for both
proposed surveys, the total time burden on the general public would be
10,000 hours. The respondents would not incur any reporting cost from
the information collection. The respondents also would not incur any
record keeping burden or recordkeeping cost from the information
collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).
Issued on: June 8, 2012.
Jeffrey Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2012-14413 Filed 6-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P