Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments, 32942 [2012-13482]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
32942
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 107 / Monday, June 4, 2012 / Notices
Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms from India for the
period of review (POR) of February 1,
2011, through January 31, 2012.1
On February 29, 2012, in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.213(b), the Department received a
timely request from Monterey
Mushrooms, Inc. (the petitioner), a
petitioner and a domestic interested
party, to conduct an administrative
review of the sales of Agro Dutch Foods
Limited (Agro Dutch Industries Limited)
(Agro Dutch), Himalya International
Ltd. (Himalya), Hindustan Lever Ltd.
(formerly Ponds India, Ltd.)
(Hindustan), Transchem Ltd.
(Transchem), and Weikfield Foods Pvt.
Ltd (Weikfield). The petitioner was the
only party to request this administrative
review.
On March 30, 2012, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain preserved mushrooms from
India with respect to the above-named
companies.2
On May 10, 2012, the petitioner
timely withdrew its request for a review
of Himalya, Hindustan, Transchem and
Weikfield.
Partial Rescission of Review
ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the parties that requested a
review withdraw the request within 90
days of the date of publication of notice
of initiation of the requested review.
The petitioner withdrew its request for
review before the 90-day deadline, and
no other party requested an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms from India for the
POR. Therefore, in response to the
petitioner’s withdrawal of its request for
review of Himalya, Hindustan,
Transchem and Weikfield and pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are
rescinding this review with regard to
these companies. The instant review
will continue with respect to Agro
Dutch.
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 77 FR 4990
(February 1, 2012).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews, Request for Revocation in
Part, and Deferral of Administrative Review, 77 FR
19179 (March 30, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Antidumping duties
shall be assessed at rates equal to the
cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as the only
reminder to importers of their
responsibility, under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 25, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–13475 Filed 6–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of
Scientific Instruments
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we
invite comments on the question of
whether instruments of equivalent
scientific value, for the purposes for
which the instruments shown below are
intended to be used, are being
manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR
301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and
be postmarked on or before (Insert date
20 days after publication in the Federal
Register). Address written comments to
Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room
3720, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Washington, DC 20230. Applications
may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and
5:00 p.m. at the U.S. Department of
Commerce in Room 3720.
Docket Number: 12–024. Applicant:
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University, 3123 TAMU,
College Station, TX 77843–3123.
Instrument: Arc melting system.
Manufacturer: Edmund Beuhler GmbH,
Germany. Intended Use: The instrument
will be used to fabricate bulk
nanostructured metals and metallic
glasses, in particular Mg based alloys,
CuNb, NiAl, Nb based alloys and metal
matrix composites with oxide
nanoparticles. It will be used to
investigate the influence of suction
casting on the formation of
nanostructures in casted alloys, and to
study the behavior of these casted
alloys, in order to design radiation
tolerant and impact resistant high
strength alloys with unique
microstructures. Pertinent features of
this instrument include the capability of
suction casting and ceramic powder
feed-through for the addition of oxide
nanoparticles during the melting of
metals. Suction casting is required to
achieve nanocrystalline grains, and
ceramic powder feed-through will be
used to mix ceramic powders with
melted metals to achieve metal based
nanocomposites. Justification for DutyFree Entry: There are no instruments of
the same general category manufactured
in the United States. Application
accepted by Commissioner of Customs:
April 25, 2012.
Dated: May 29, 2012.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director of Subsidies Enforcement, Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–13482 Filed 6–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 107 (Monday, June 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 32942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13482]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended
by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments
on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value,
for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to
be used, are being manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the
regulations and be postmarked on or before (Insert date 20 days after
publication in the Federal Register). Address written comments to
Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be examined between
8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room
3720.
Docket Number: 12-024. Applicant: Department of Mechanical
Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3123 TAMU, College Station, TX
77843-3123. Instrument: Arc melting system. Manufacturer: Edmund
Beuhler GmbH, Germany. Intended Use: The instrument will be used to
fabricate bulk nanostructured metals and metallic glasses, in
particular Mg based alloys, CuNb, NiAl, Nb based alloys and metal
matrix composites with oxide nanoparticles. It will be used to
investigate the influence of suction casting on the formation of
nanostructures in casted alloys, and to study the behavior of these
casted alloys, in order to design radiation tolerant and impact
resistant high strength alloys with unique microstructures. Pertinent
features of this instrument include the capability of suction casting
and ceramic powder feed-through for the addition of oxide nanoparticles
during the melting of metals. Suction casting is required to achieve
nanocrystalline grains, and ceramic powder feed-through will be used to
mix ceramic powders with melted metals to achieve metal based
nanocomposites. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There are no
instruments of the same general category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 25,
2012.
Dated: May 29, 2012.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director of Subsidies Enforcement, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-13482 Filed 6-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
