Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 32938-32941 [2012-13476]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
• International Trade Administration

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 107 (Monday, June 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32938-32941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-844]


Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting the 
first administrative review of the antidumping duty order on narrow 
woven ribbons with woven selvedge (narrow woven ribbons) from Taiwan. 
The sole mandatory respondent in this administrative review, 
Hubschercorp, did not respond to the Department's questionnaire. As a 
result, we have preliminarily assigned Hubschercorp a margin based on 
adverse facts available (AFA). The period of review (POR) is September 
1, 2010, through August 31, 2011.
    If the preliminary results are adopted in our final results of 
administrative review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary 
results.

DATES: Effective Date: June 4, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holly Phelps, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0656.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    In September 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register 
an antidumping duty order on narrow woven ribbons from Taiwan.\1\ On 
September 2, 2011, the Department published in the Federal Register a 
notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on narrow woven ribbons from Taiwan for the 
period September 1, 2010, through August 31, 2011.\2\ In response to a 
timely request from the petitioner, Berwick Offray LLC and its wholly-
owned subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, Inc., pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.213(b)(1), the Department initiated an administrative review for 
the following ten companies: (1) Apex Ribbon; (2) Apex Trimmings; (3) 
FinerRibbon.com; (4) Hubschercorp; (5) Intercontinental Skyline; (6) 
Multicolor Inc.; (7) Pacific Imports; (8) Papillon Ribbon & Bow 
(Canada); (9) Shienq Huong Enterprise Co., Ltd./Hsien Chan Enterprise 
Co., Ltd./Novelty Handicrafts Co., Ltd.; and (10) Supreme Laces, 
Inc.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan and 
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 
(Sept. 1, 2010), as amended in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 
Selvedge From Taiwan and the People's Republic of China: Amended 
Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 56982 (Sept. 17, 2010).
    \2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative 
Review, 76 FR 54735, 54736 (Sept. 2, 2011).
    \3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 
67133, 67138 (Oct. 31, 2011); and Correction to Initiation of 2010-
2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Narrow Woven Ribbons 
With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan, 77 FR 82 (Jan. 3, 2012) (Initiation 
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In November 2011 and January 2012, we requested that each company 
named in the Initiation Notice provide data on the quantity and value 
(Q&V) of its exports of subject merchandise to the United States during 
the POR. We received responses to the Q&V questionnaires during the 
period November 2011 through January 2012.
    On January 30, 2012, the petitioner withdrew its request for an 
administrative review for all companies named in the Initiation Notice 
except Hubschercorp. On this same date, we issued the antidumping duty 
questionnaire to Hubschercorp.
    On February 17, 2012, we rescinded the review with respect to the 
following companies: (1) Apex Ribbon; (2) Apex Trimmings; (3) 
FinerRibbon.com; (4) Intercontinental Skyline; (5) Multicolor Inc.; (6) 
Pacific Imports; (7) Papillon Ribbon & Bow (Canada); (8) Shienq Huong 
Enterprise Co., Ltd./Hsien Chan Enterprise Co., Ltd./Novelty 
Handicrafts Co., Ltd.; and (9) Supreme Laces, Inc.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan: 
Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 
FR 9624 (Feb. 17, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Also on February 17, 2012, Hubschercorp contacted the Department to 
inform us that it was having difficulty in responding to the 
Department's questionnaire and that it may not be able to participate 
in this review. On February 21, 2012 (i.e., the due date for the first 
portion of the questionnaire response), we followed up with 
Hubschercorp to determine whether the company intended to participate 
in the administrative review. On February 24, 2012, Hubschercorp 
informed the Department that it did not intend to respond to the 
questionnaire or participate in the administrative review.\5\ 
Therefore, in accordance with section 776(a)(2)(A), (B) and (C) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), for these preliminary 
results, the Department has applied facts otherwise available with an 
adverse inference when determining Hubschercorp's rate. See the section 
``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and AFA,'' below, for further 
discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See the February 27, 2012, Memorandum to the File From 
Elizabeth Eastwood, Senior Analyst, and Holly Phelps, Analyst, 
entitled, ``Phone Conversation With Hubschercorp Regarding the 2010-
2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Narrow Woven Ribbons 
with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan'' (Hubschercorp Memo), for further 
discussion of our correspondence with Hubschercorp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The scope of this order covers narrow woven ribbons with woven 
selvedge, in any length, but with a width (measured at the narrowest 
span of the ribbon) less than or equal to 12 centimeters, composed of, 
in whole or in part, man-made fibers (whether artificial or synthetic, 
including but not limited to nylon, polyester, rayon, polypropylene, 
and polyethylene teraphthalate), metal threads and/or metalized yarns, 
or any combination thereof. Narrow woven ribbons subject to the order 
may:

[[Page 32939]]

     Also include natural or other non-man-made fibers;
     Be of any color, style, pattern, or weave construction, 
including but not limited to single-faced satin, double-faced satin, 
grosgrain, sheer, taffeta, twill, jacquard, or a combination of two or 
more colors, styles, patterns, and/or weave constructions;
     Have been subjected to, or composed of materials that have 
been subjected to, various treatments, including but not limited to 
dyeing, printing, foil stamping, embossing, flocking, coating, and/or 
sizing;
     Have embellishments, including but not limited to 
appliqu[eacute], fringes, embroidery, buttons, glitter, sequins, 
laminates, and/or adhesive backing;
     Have wire and/or monofilament in, on, or along the 
longitudinal edges of the ribbon;
     Have ends of any shape or dimension, including but not 
limited to straight ends that are perpendicular to the longitudinal 
edges of the ribbon, tapered ends, flared ends or shaped ends, and the 
ends of such woven ribbons may or may not be hemmed;
     Have longitudinal edges that are straight or of any shape, 
and the longitudinal edges of such woven ribbon may or may not be 
parallel to each other;
     Consist of such ribbons affixed to like ribbon and/or cut-
edge woven ribbon, a configuration also known as an ``ornamental 
trimming;''
     Be wound on spools; attached to a card; hanked (i.e., 
coiled or bundled); packaged in boxes, trays or bags; or configured as 
skeins, balls, bateaus or folds; and/or
     Be included within a kit or set such as when packaged with 
other products, including but not limited to gift bags, gift boxes and/
or other types of ribbon.
    Narrow woven ribbons subject to the order include all narrow woven 
fabrics, tapes, and labels that fall within this written description of 
the scope of this antidumping duty order.
    Excluded from the scope of the order are the following:
    (1) Formed bows composed of narrow woven ribbons with woven 
selvedge;
    (2) ``Pull-bows'' (i.e., an assemblage of ribbons connected to one 
another, folded flat and equipped with a means to form such ribbons 
into the shape of a bow by pulling on a length of material affixed to 
such assemblage) composed of narrow woven ribbons;
    (3) Narrow woven ribbons comprised at least 20 percent by weight of 
elastomeric yarn (i.e., filament yarn, including monofilament, of 
synthetic textile material, other than textured yarn, which does not 
break on being extended to three times its original length and which 
returns, after being extended to twice its original length, within a 
period of five minutes, to a length not greater than one and a half 
times its original length as defined in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States (HTSUS), Section XI, Note 13) or rubber thread;
    (4) Narrow woven ribbons of a kind used for the manufacture of 
typewriter or printer ribbons;
    (5) Narrow woven labels and apparel tapes, cut-to-length or cut-to-
shape, having a length (when measured across the longest edge-to-edge 
span) not exceeding eight centimeters;
    (6) Narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge attached to and 
forming the handle of a gift bag;
    (7) Cut-edge narrow woven ribbons formed by cutting broad woven 
fabric into strips of ribbon, with or without treatments to prevent the 
longitudinal edges of the ribbon from fraying (such as by merrowing, 
lamination, sono-bonding, fusing, gumming or waxing), and with or 
without wire running lengthwise along the longitudinal edges of the 
ribbon;
    (8) Narrow woven ribbons comprised at least 85 percent by weight of 
threads having a denier of 225 or higher;
    (9) Narrow woven ribbons constructed from pile fabrics (i.e., 
fabrics with a surface effect formed by tufts or loops of yarn that 
stand up from the body of the fabric);
    (10) Narrow woven ribbon affixed (including by tying) as a 
decorative detail to non-subject merchandise, such as a gift bag, gift 
box, gift tin, greeting card or plush toy, or affixed (including by 
tying) as a decorative detail to packaging containing non-subject 
merchandise;
    (11) Narrow woven ribbon that is (a) affixed to non-subject 
merchandise as a working component of such non-subject merchandise, 
such as where narrow woven ribbon comprises an apparel trimming, book 
marker, bag cinch, or part of an identity card holder, or (b) affixed 
(including by tying) to non-subject merchandise as a working component 
that holds or packages such non-subject merchandise or attaches 
packaging or labeling to such non-subject merchandise, such as a 
``belly band'' around a pair of pajamas, a pair of socks or a blanket;
    (12) Narrow woven ribbon(s) comprising a belt attached to and 
imported with an item of wearing apparel, whether or not such belt is 
removable from such item of wearing apparel; and
    (13) Narrow woven ribbon(s) included with non-subject merchandise 
in kits, such as a holiday ornament craft kit or a scrapbook kit, in 
which the individual lengths of narrow woven ribbon(s) included in the 
kit are each no greater than eight inches, the aggregate amount of 
narrow woven ribbon(s) included in the kit does not exceed 48 linear 
inches, none of the narrow woven ribbon(s) included in the kit is on a 
spool, and the narrow woven ribbon(s) is only one of multiple items 
included in the kit.
    The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under the 
HTSUS statistical categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 5806.32.1050 
and 5806.32.1060. Subject merchandise also may enter under subheadings 
5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 5810.91.00; 
5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 and 
under statistical categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 5903.90.3090; 
and 6307.90.9889. The HTSUS statistical categories and subheadings are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written 
description of the merchandise covered by this order is dispositive.

Use of Facts Otherwise Available and AFA

    Section 776(a) of the Act provides that the Department shall apply 
``facts otherwise available'' if: (1) Necessary information is not on 
the record; or (2) an interested party or any other person (A) 
withholds information that has been requested, (B) fails to provide 
information within the deadlines established, or in the form and manner 
requested by the Department, subject to subsections (c)(1) and (e) of 
section 782 of the Act, (C) significantly impedes a proceeding, or (D) 
provides information that cannot be verified as provided by section 
782(i) of the Act.
    Section 776(b) of the Act further provides that the Department may 
use an adverse inference in applying the facts otherwise available when 
a party has failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its 
ability to comply with a request for information. Such an adverse 
inference may include reliance on information derived from the 
petition, the final determination, a previous administrative review, or 
other information placed on the record.
    As noted in the ``Background'' section, above, Hubschercorp did not 
respond to the Department's questionnaire in this administrative review 
and informed the Department that it did not intend to participate in 
this review. See Hubschercorp Memo. As a result, Hubschercorp did not 
provide requested information that is necessary for the Department to

[[Page 32940]]

calculate an antidumping duty rate for the company in this 
administrative review. Therefore, in reaching these preliminary 
results, pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, the Department has 
based Hubschercorp's antidumping duty rate on facts otherwise available 
on the record.
    By only responding to the Department's Q&V questionnaire and 
failing to respond to the Department's antidumping questionnaire, 
Hubschercorp withheld requested information and significantly impeded 
this proceeding. Thus, pursuant to section 776(a)(2)(A) and (C) of the 
Act, the Department preliminarily finds that the use of total facts 
available is appropriate.
    According to section 776(b) of the Act, if the Department finds 
that an interested party fails to cooperate by not acting to the best 
of its ability to comply with requests for information, the Department 
may use an inference that is adverse to the interests of that party in 
selecting from the facts otherwise available. See Notice of Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Bar 
From India, 70 FR 54023, 54025-26 (Sept. 13, 2005); Notice of Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative 
Critical Circumstances: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From 
Brazil, 67 FR 55792, 55794-96 (Aug. 30, 2002). Adverse inferences are 
appropriate ``to ensure that the party does not obtain a more favorable 
result by failing to cooperate than if it had cooperated fully.'' See 
Statement of Administrative Action accompanying the Uruguay Round 
Agreements Act, H.R. Rep. No. 103-316, Vol. 1, at 870 (1994) (SAA), 
reprinted in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040, 4198-99. Furthermore, 
``affirmative evidence of bad faith on the part of a respondent is not 
required before the Department may make an adverse inference.'' See 
Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final rule, 62 FR 27296, 
27340 (May 19, 1997); see also Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States, 337 
F.3d 1373, 1382-83 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (Nippon). We preliminarily find 
that Hubschercorp did not act to the best of its ability in this 
administrative review, within the meaning of section 776(b) of the Act, 
because it failed to respond to the Department's requests for 
information and provide timely information. Therefore, an adverse 
inference is warranted in selecting from the facts otherwise available 
with respect to this company. See Nippon, 337 F.3d at 1382-83.

Selection of the AFA Rate

    Section 776(b) of the Act provides that the Department may use as 
AFA information derived from: (1) The petition; (2) the final 
determination in the investigation; (3) any previous review; or (4) any 
other information placed on the record.
    The Department's practice, when selecting an AFA rate from among 
the possible sources of information, has been to select the highest 
rate on the record of the proceeding and to ensure that the margin is 
sufficiently adverse ``as to effectuate the statutory purposes of the 
adverse facts available rule to induce respondents to provide the 
Department with complete and accurate information in a timely manner.'' 
See, e.g., Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; Final 
Results and Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review in 
Part, 71 FR 65082, 65084 (Nov. 7, 2006).
    As a result, we have preliminarily assigned to Hubschercorp a rate 
of 137.20 percent, which is the highest rate alleged in the petition, 
as noted in the initiation of the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation. See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the 
People's Republic of China and Taiwan: Initiation of Antidumping Duty 
Investigations, 74 FR 39291 (Aug. 6, 2009) (LTFV Initiation).

Corroboration of Secondary Information

    Information from prior segments of the proceeding constitutes 
secondary information and section 776(c) of the Act provides that the 
Department shall, to the extent practicable, corroborate that secondary 
information from independent sources reasonably at its disposal. The 
Department's regulations provide that ``corroborate'' means that the 
Department will satisfy itself that the secondary information to be 
used has probative value. See 19 CFR 351.308(d); see also SAA at 870. 
To be considered corroborated, the Department must find the secondary 
information is both reliable and relevant.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See, e.g., SAA at 870; Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 
Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From Japan, and Tapered Roller 
Bearings, Four Inches or Less in Outside Diameter, and Components 
Thereof, From Japan; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Partial Termination of Administrative 
Reviews, 61 FR 57391, 57392 (Nov. 6, 1996), unchanged in Tapered 
Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From 
Japan, and Tapered Roller Bearings, Four Inches or Less in Outside 
Diameter, and Components Thereof, From Japan; Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Termination in Part, 62 
FR 11825 (Mar. 13, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To determine whether the information is reliable, we reviewed the 
adequacy and accuracy of the information in the petition during our 
pre-initiation analysis and for purposes of these preliminary results. 
See LTFV Initiation at 39294-39295. We examined evidence supporting the 
calculations in the petition to determine the probative value of the 
margins alleged in the petition for use as AFA for purposes of these 
preliminary results. Based on our examination of the information, as 
discussed in detail in LTFV Initiation, we consider the petitioner's 
calculation of the export price and normal value to be reliable. 
Therefore, because we confirmed the accuracy and validity of the 
information underlying the calculation of margins in the petition by 
examining source documents as well as publicly available information, 
we preliminarily determine that the margins in the petition are 
reliable for the purposes of this administrative review.
    To determine the relevance of the petition margin, we compared it 
to the model-specific rates calculated for the respondents in the LTFV 
investigation. We find that this margin is relevant because this is the 
first review under this order (i.e., only one segment removed from the 
LTFV investigation), and the petition rate fell within the range of 
model-specific margins calculated for two of the three mandatory 
respondents in the LTFV investigation. See e.g., Certain Frozen 
Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Preliminary Results and Preliminary 
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 
12088, 12092 (Mar. 6, 2008), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater 
Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 50933 (Aug. 29, 2008). 
See also the Memorandum to the File from Holly Phelps, Analyst, 
entitled, ``Placement of Proprietary Model-Specific Margins from the 
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation on the Record and Corroboration of 
Adverse Facts Available Rate for the Preliminary Results in the 2010-
2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Narrow Woven Ribbons 
with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan,'' dated May 29, 2012 (Corroboration 
Memo). Therefore, we have determined that the 137.20 percent margin is 
appropriate as AFA and are assigning it to Hubschercorp.
    Further, the Department will consider information reasonably at its 
disposal as to whether there are circumstances that would render a 
margin inappropriate. Where circumstances indicate that the

[[Page 32941]]

selected margin is not appropriate as AFA, the Department may disregard 
the margin and determine an appropriate margin. See, e.g., Fresh Cut 
Flowers from Mexico; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 61 FR 6812, 6814 (Feb. 22, 1996) (where the Department 
disregarded the highest calculated margin as AFA because the margin was 
based on a company's uncharacteristic business expense resulting in an 
unusually high margin). Therefore, we examined whether any information 
on the record would discredit the selected rate as reasonable facts 
available. We were unable to find any information that would discredit 
the selected AFA rate.
    Based on the above, for these preliminary results, the Department 
finds the highest rate derived from the petition (i.e., 137.20 percent) 
is therefore corroborated to the extent practicable. Thus, we have 
assigned Hubschercorp this rate as AFA in this administrative review. 
For further discussion of the corroboration of this rate, see the 
Corroboration Memo.

Preliminary Results of the Review

    We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average 
dumping margin exists for the period September 1, 2010, through August 
31, 2011:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
                     Manufacturer/exporter                       margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubschercorp..................................................    137.20
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Hearing

    The Department will disclose to interested parties the calculations 
performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days 
of the date of publication of this notice. See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases 
briefs not later than the later of 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 
in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the 
date for filing case briefs. See 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit 
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to 
submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief 
summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. See 19 CFR 
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, 
filed electronically using Import Administration's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 
An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its 
entirety by the Department's electronic records system, IA ACCESS, by 5 
p.m. Eastern Standard Time within 30 days after the date of publication 
of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address 
and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of 
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to 
those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department will issue 
the final results of this administrative review, including the results 
of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later 
than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall 
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). The Department will 
issue appropriate appraisement instructions for the companies subject 
to this review directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 
the final results of this review.
    For Hubschercorp's U.S. sales, we will base the assessment rate 
assigned to the corresponding entries on AFA, determined as noted 
above.
    The final results of this review shall be the basis for the 
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by 
the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated 
duties, where applicable. See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hubschercorp 
will be that established in the final results of this review; (2) for 
previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this 
review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific 
rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a 
firm covered in this review, or the original LTFV investigation, but 
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established 
for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and 
(4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will 
continue to be 4.37 percent, the all-others rate made effective by the 
Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value: Narrow 
Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan, 75 FR 41804 (July 19, 
2010). These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This administrative review and notice are published in accordance 
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).

     Dated: May 29, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-13476 Filed 6-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P