Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To Determine Whether To Disapprove Proposed Rule Changes, as Modified by Amendments Nos. 1 and 2, Adopting NYSE Rule 107C To Establish a Retail Liquidity Program for NYSE-Listed Securities on a Pilot Basis Until 12 Months From Implementation Date, and Adopting NYSE Amex Rule 107C To Establish a Retail Liquidity Program for NYSE Amex Equities Traded Securities on a Pilot Basis Until 12 Months From Implementation Date, 27508-27509 [2012-11247]
Download as PDF
27508
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 91 / Thursday, May 10, 2012 / Notices
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NSX–2012–05 and should
be submitted on or before May 31, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–11245 Filed 5–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–66928; File Nos. SR–NYSE–
2011–55; SR–NYSEAmex–2011–84]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE
Amex LLC; Notice of Designation of
Longer Period for Commission Action
on Proceedings To Determine Whether
To Disapprove Proposed Rule
Changes, as Modified by Amendments
Nos. 1 and 2, Adopting NYSE Rule
107C To Establish a Retail Liquidity
Program for NYSE-Listed Securities on
a Pilot Basis Until 12 Months From
Implementation Date, and Adopting
NYSE Amex Rule 107C To Establish a
Retail Liquidity Program for NYSE
Amex Equities Traded Securities on a
Pilot Basis Until 12 Months From
Implementation Date
May 4, 2012.
On October 19, 2011, New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) and NYSE
Amex LLC (‘‘NYSE Amex’’ and together
with NYSE, the ‘‘Exchanges’’) each filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to establish a Retail Liquidity
Program (‘‘Program’’) on a pilot basis for
a period of one year from the date of
implementation, if approved. The
proposed rule changes were published
for comment in the Federal Register on
November 9, 2011.3
The Commission received 28
comments on the NYSE proposal 4 and
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 65671
(November 2, 2011), 76 FR 69774 (SR–NYSE Amex–
2011–84); and 65672 (November 2, 2011), 76 FR
69788 (SR–NYSE–2011–55).
4 See Letters to the Commission from Sal Arnuk,
Joe Saluzzi and Paul Zajac, Themis Trading LLC,
dated October 17, 2011 (‘‘Themis Letter’’); Garret
Cook, dated November 4, 2011 (‘‘Cook Letter’’);
James Johannes, dated November 27, 2011
(‘‘Johannes Letter’’); Ken Voorhies, dated November
28, 2011 (‘‘Voorhies Letter’’); William Wuepper,
dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Wuepper Letter’’); A.
Joseph, dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Joseph Letter’’);
Leonard Amoruso, General Counsel, Knight Capital,
Inc., dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Knight Letter I’’);
Kevin Basic, dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Basic
Letter’’); J. Fournier, dated November 28, 2011
(‘‘Fournier Letter’’); Ullrich Fischer, CTO, PairCo,
dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘PairCo Letter’’); James
Angel, Associate Professor of Finance, McDonough
School of Business, Georgetown University, dated
November 28, 2011 (‘‘Angel Letter’’); Jordan Wollin,
dated November 29, 2011 (‘‘Wollin Letter’’); Aaron
Schafter, President, Great Mountain Capital
Management LLC, dated November 29, 2011 (‘‘Great
Mountain Capital Letter’’); Wayne Koch, Trader,
Bright Trading, dated November 29, 2011 (‘‘Koch
Letter’’); Kurt Schact, CFA, Managing Director, and
James Allen, CFA, Head, Capital Markets Policy,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 17
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 May 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
four comments on the NYSE Amex
proposal.5 On December 19, 2011, the
Commission extended the time for
Commission action on the proposed rule
changes until February 7, 2012.6 In
connection with the proposals, the
Exchanges requested exemptive relief
from Rule 612(c) of Regulation NMS,7
which prohibits a national securities
exchange from accepting or ranking
certain orders based on an increment
smaller than the minimum pricing
increment.8 The Exchanges submitted a
consolidated response letter on January
3, 2012.9 On January 17, 2012, the
Exchanges each filed Partial
Amendment No. 1 to their proposals.10
CFA Institute, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘CFA
Letter I’’); David Green, Bright Trading, dated
November 30, 2011 (‘‘Green Letter’’); Robert Bright,
Chief Executive Officer, and Dennis Dick, CFA,
Market Structure Consultant, Bright Trading LLC,
dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Bright Trading Letter’’);
Bodil Jelsness, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Jelsness
Letter’’); Christopher Nagy, Managing Director,
Order Routing and Market Data Strategy, TD
Ameritrade, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘TD
Ameritrade Letter’’); Laura Kenney, dated
November 30, 2011 (‘‘Kenney Letter’’); Suhas
Daftuar, Hudson River Trading LLC, dated
November 30, 2011 (‘‘Hudson River Trading
Letter’’); Bosier Parsons, Bright Trading LLC, dated
November 30, 2011 (‘‘Parsons Letter’’); Mike
Stewart, Head of Global Equities, UBS, dated
November 30, 2011 (‘‘UBS Letter’’); Dr. Larry Paden,
Bright Trading, dated December 1, 2011 (‘‘Paden
Letter’’); Thomas Dercks, dated December 1, 2011
(‘‘Dercks Letter’’); Eric Swanson, Secretary, BATS
Global Markets, Inc., dated December 6, 2011
(‘‘BATS Letter’’); Ann Vlcek, Director and Associate
General Counsel, Securities Industry and Financial
Markets Association, dated December 7, 2011
(‘‘SIFMA Letter I’’); and Al Patten, dated December
29, 2011 (‘‘Patten Letter’’).
5 See Knight Letter I; CFA Letter I; TD Ameritrade
Letter; and letter to the Commission from Shannon
Jennewein, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Jennewein
Letter’’).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66003,
76 FR 80445 (December 23, 2011).
7 17 CFR 242.612(c).
8 See Letter from Janet M. McGinness, Senior Vice
President-Legal and Corporate Secretary, Office of
the General Counsel, NYSE Euronext to Elizabeth
M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, dated October
19, 2011. The Exchanges amended the exemptive
relief request on January 13, 2012. See Letter from
Janet M. McGinness, Senior Vice President-Legal
and Corporate Secretary, Office of the General
Counsel, NYSE Euronext to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Commission, dated January 13, 2012.
9 See Letter to the Commission from Janet
McGinnis, Senior Vice President, Legal & Corporate
Secretary, Legal & Government Affairs, NYSE
Euronext, dated January 3, 2012 (‘‘Exchanges’
Response Letter I’’).
10 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchanges propose
to modify the proposals as follows: (1) To state that
Retail Member Organizations may receive free
executions for their retail orders and the fees and
credits for liquidity providers and Retail Member
Organizations would be determined based on
experience with the Retail Liquidity Program in the
first several months; (2) to correct a typographical
error referring to the amount of minimum price
improvement on a 500 share order; (3) to indicate
the Retail Liquidity Identifier would be initially
available on each Exchange’s proprietary data feeds,
and would be later available on the public market
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 91 / Thursday, May 10, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
On February 7, 2012, the Commission
instituted proceedings to determine
whether to disapprove the proposed
rule changes, as modified by
Amendments No. 1.11 On February 16,
2012, the Exchanges each filed Partial
Amendment No. 2 to their proposals,
which the Commission published for
comment in the Federal Register on
March 1, 2012 (‘‘Notice of Partial
Amendment No. 2’’).12 In response to
the Order Instituting Proceedings and
the Notice of Partial Amendment No. 2,
the Commission received four
additional comment letters on the
proposals.13 On March 20, 2012, the
Exchanges submitted a consolidated
rebuttal letter in response to the Order
Instituting Proceedings.14 Additionally,
on April 10, 2012, the Exchanges
submitted a consolidated response to
the comments concerning Partial
Amendments No. 2.15
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 16 provides
that, after initiating disapproval
proceedings, the Commission shall issue
an order approving or disapproving the
proposed rule changes not later than
180 days after the date of publication of
notice of their filing. The Commission
may extend the period for issuing an
order approving or disapproving the
proposed rule changes, however, by up
to 60 days if the Commission
determines that a longer period is
appropriate and publishes the reasons
for such determination. In this case, the
proposed rule changes were published
for notice and comment in the Federal
Register on November 9, 2011; May 7,
2012, is 180 days from that date, and
July 6, 2012, is 240 days from that date.
The Commission finds it appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule changes
so that it has sufficient time to consider
the Program and the issues that
commenters have raised concerning the
Program. Specifically, as the
Commission noted in the Order
Instituting Proceedings, the Program
raises several notable issues, including
whether the Program is consistent with
the Sub-Penny Rule and with the Quote
Rule. The Commission’s resolution of
these issues could have an impact on
overall market structure. As a result, the
Commission continues to consider
whether the proposed rule changes are
consistent with these particular
Regulation NMS Rules and with the Act.
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,17 designates July 6, 2012, as the
date by which the Commission shall
either approve or disapprove the
proposed rule changes (File Nos. SR–
NYSE–2011–55 and SR–NYSEAmex–
2011–84).
data stream; and (4) to limit the Retail Liquidity
Program to securities that trade at prices equal to
or greater than $1 per share.
11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66346,
77 FR 7628 (February 13, 2012) (‘‘Order Instituting
Proceedings’’).
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66464
(February 24, 2012), 77 FR 12629.
13 See Letters to the Commission from Leonard
Amoruso, General Counsel, Knight Capital, Inc.,
dated March 7, 2012 (‘‘Knight Letter II’’); Kurt
Schact, CFA, Managing Director, Rhodri Preece,
CFA, Director, Capital Markets Policy, and James
Allen, CFA, Head, Capital Markets Policy, CFA
Institute, dated March 21, 2012 (‘‘CFA Letter II’’);
Ann Vlcek, Director and Associate General Counsel,
Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association, dated March 23, 2012 (‘‘SIFMA Letter
II’’); and Jim Toes, President and CEO, and Jennifer
Green Setzenfand, Chairman, Security Traders
Association, dated April 26, 2012.
14 See Letter to the Commission from Janet
McGinnis, Senior Vice President, Legal & Corporate
Secretary, Legal & Government Affairs, NYSE
Euronext, dated March 20, 2012 (‘‘Exchanges’
Response Letter II’’).
15 See Letter to the Commission from Janet
McGinnis, Senior Vice President, Legal & Corporate
Secretary, Legal & Government Affairs, NYSE
Euronext, dated April 10, 2012 (‘‘Exchanges’
Response Letter III’’).
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
[Release No. 34–66927; File No. SR–MSRB–
2011–09]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 May 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–11247 Filed 5–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board; Order Approving Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 2, Consisting of
Interpretive Notice Concerning the
Application of MSRB Rule G–17 to
Underwriters of Municipal Securities
May 4, 2012.
I. Introduction
On August 22, 2011, the Municipal
Securities Rulemaking Board (‘‘MSRB’’
or ‘‘Board’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’) 1 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
17 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
18 17
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27509
change consisting of an interpretive
notice concerning the application of
MSRB Rule G–17 (Conduct of Municipal
Securities and Municipal Advisory
Activities) to underwriters of municipal
securities (‘‘Interpretive Notice’’). The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
September 9, 2011.3 The Commission
received five comment letters on the
proposed rule change.4 On October 11,
2011, the MSRB extended the time
period for Commission action to
December 7, 2011. On November 3,
2011, the MSRB filed Amendment No.
1 to the proposed rule change. On
November 10, 2011, the MSRB
withdrew Amendment No. 1, responded
to comments,5 and filed Amendment
No. 2 to the proposed rule change. The
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 2, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
November 21, 2011.6 The Commission
received eight comment letters on the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 2, and a second
response from the MSRB.7 On December
6, 2011, the MSRB extended the time
period for Commission action to
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65263
(September 6, 2011), 76 FR 55989 (‘‘Original Notice
of Filing’’).
4 See letters from Joy A. Howard, Principal, WM
Financial Strategies, dated September 30, 2011
(‘‘WM Letter I’’); Mike Nicholas, Chief Executive
Officer, Bond Dealers of America, dated September
30, 2010 (‘‘BDA Letter I’’); Colette J. Irwin-Knott,
CIPFA, President, National Association of
Independent Public Finance Advisors, dated
September 30, 2011 (‘‘NAIPFA Letter I’’); Leslie M.
Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General
Counsel, Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association, dated September 30, 2011 (‘‘SIFMA
Letter I’’); and Susan Gaffney, Director, Federal
Liaison Center, Government Finance Officers
Association, dated October 3, 2011 (‘‘GFOA Letter
I’’).
5 See letter from Margaret C. Henry, General
Counsel, Market Regulation, MSRB, dated
November 10, 2011 (‘‘Response Letter I’’).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65749
(November 15, 2011), 76 FR 72013 (‘‘Amended
Notice of Filing’’).
7 See letters from Colette J. Irwin-Knott, CIPFA,
President, National Association of Independent
Public Finance Advisors, dated November 30, 2011
(‘‘NAIPFA Letter II’’); E. John White, Chief
Executive Officer, Public Financial Management,
Inc., dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘PFM Letter I’’);
Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and
Associate General Counsel, Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association, dated November 30,
2011 (‘‘SIFMA Letter II’’); Joy A. Howard, Principal,
WM Financial Strategies, dated November 30, 2011
(‘‘WM Letter II’’); Michael Nicholas, CEO, Bond
Dealers of America, dated December 1, 2011 (‘‘BDA
Letter II’’); Susan Gaffney, Director, Federal Liaison
Center, Government Finance Officers Association,
dated December 1, 2011 (‘‘GFOA Letter II’’); Robert
Doty, AGFS, dated December 1, 2011 (‘‘AGFS
Letter’’); and Peter C. Orr, CFA, President, Intuitive
Analytics LLC, dated December 7, 2011 (‘‘IA
Letter’’). See letter from Margaret C. Henry, General
Counsel, Market Regulation, MSRB, dated
December 7, 2011 (‘‘Response Letter II’’).
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27508-27509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11247]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-66928; File Nos. SR-NYSE-2011-55; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-84]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE
Amex LLC; Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action
on Proceedings To Determine Whether To Disapprove Proposed Rule
Changes, as Modified by Amendments Nos. 1 and 2, Adopting NYSE Rule
107C To Establish a Retail Liquidity Program for NYSE-Listed Securities
on a Pilot Basis Until 12 Months From Implementation Date, and Adopting
NYSE Amex Rule 107C To Establish a Retail Liquidity Program for NYSE
Amex Equities Traded Securities on a Pilot Basis Until 12 Months From
Implementation Date
May 4, 2012.
On October 19, 2011, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') and
NYSE Amex LLC (``NYSE Amex'' and together with NYSE, the ``Exchanges'')
each filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'')
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
establish a Retail Liquidity Program (``Program'') on a pilot basis for
a period of one year from the date of implementation, if approved. The
proposed rule changes were published for comment in the Federal
Register on November 9, 2011.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 65671 (November 2,
2011), 76 FR 69774 (SR-NYSE Amex-2011-84); and 65672 (November 2,
2011), 76 FR 69788 (SR-NYSE-2011-55).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission received 28 comments on the NYSE proposal \4\ and
four comments on the NYSE Amex proposal.\5\ On December 19, 2011, the
Commission extended the time for Commission action on the proposed rule
changes until February 7, 2012.\6\ In connection with the proposals,
the Exchanges requested exemptive relief from Rule 612(c) of Regulation
NMS,\7\ which prohibits a national securities exchange from accepting
or ranking certain orders based on an increment smaller than the
minimum pricing increment.\8\ The Exchanges submitted a consolidated
response letter on January 3, 2012.\9\ On January 17, 2012, the
Exchanges each filed Partial Amendment No. 1 to their proposals.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Letters to the Commission from Sal Arnuk, Joe Saluzzi
and Paul Zajac, Themis Trading LLC, dated October 17, 2011 (``Themis
Letter''); Garret Cook, dated November 4, 2011 (``Cook Letter'');
James Johannes, dated November 27, 2011 (``Johannes Letter''); Ken
Voorhies, dated November 28, 2011 (``Voorhies Letter''); William
Wuepper, dated November 28, 2011 (``Wuepper Letter''); A. Joseph,
dated November 28, 2011 (``Joseph Letter''); Leonard Amoruso,
General Counsel, Knight Capital, Inc., dated November 28, 2011
(``Knight Letter I''); Kevin Basic, dated November 28, 2011 (``Basic
Letter''); J. Fournier, dated November 28, 2011 (``Fournier
Letter''); Ullrich Fischer, CTO, PairCo, dated November 28, 2011
(``PairCo Letter''); James Angel, Associate Professor of Finance,
McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, dated November
28, 2011 (``Angel Letter''); Jordan Wollin, dated November 29, 2011
(``Wollin Letter''); Aaron Schafter, President, Great Mountain
Capital Management LLC, dated November 29, 2011 (``Great Mountain
Capital Letter''); Wayne Koch, Trader, Bright Trading, dated
November 29, 2011 (``Koch Letter''); Kurt Schact, CFA, Managing
Director, and James Allen, CFA, Head, Capital Markets Policy, CFA
Institute, dated November 30, 2011 (``CFA Letter I''); David Green,
Bright Trading, dated November 30, 2011 (``Green Letter''); Robert
Bright, Chief Executive Officer, and Dennis Dick, CFA, Market
Structure Consultant, Bright Trading LLC, dated November 30, 2011
(``Bright Trading Letter''); Bodil Jelsness, dated November 30, 2011
(``Jelsness Letter''); Christopher Nagy, Managing Director, Order
Routing and Market Data Strategy, TD Ameritrade, dated November 30,
2011 (``TD Ameritrade Letter''); Laura Kenney, dated November 30,
2011 (``Kenney Letter''); Suhas Daftuar, Hudson River Trading LLC,
dated November 30, 2011 (``Hudson River Trading Letter''); Bosier
Parsons, Bright Trading LLC, dated November 30, 2011 (``Parsons
Letter''); Mike Stewart, Head of Global Equities, UBS, dated
November 30, 2011 (``UBS Letter''); Dr. Larry Paden, Bright Trading,
dated December 1, 2011 (``Paden Letter''); Thomas Dercks, dated
December 1, 2011 (``Dercks Letter''); Eric Swanson, Secretary, BATS
Global Markets, Inc., dated December 6, 2011 (``BATS Letter''); Ann
Vlcek, Director and Associate General Counsel, Securities Industry
and Financial Markets Association, dated December 7, 2011 (``SIFMA
Letter I''); and Al Patten, dated December 29, 2011 (``Patten
Letter'').
\5\ See Knight Letter I; CFA Letter I; TD Ameritrade Letter; and
letter to the Commission from Shannon Jennewein, dated November 30,
2011 (``Jennewein Letter'').
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66003, 76 FR 80445
(December 23, 2011).
\7\ 17 CFR 242.612(c).
\8\ See Letter from Janet M. McGinness, Senior Vice President-
Legal and Corporate Secretary, Office of the General Counsel, NYSE
Euronext to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, dated
October 19, 2011. The Exchanges amended the exemptive relief request
on January 13, 2012. See Letter from Janet M. McGinness, Senior Vice
President-Legal and Corporate Secretary, Office of the General
Counsel, NYSE Euronext to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Commission, dated January 13, 2012.
\9\ See Letter to the Commission from Janet McGinnis, Senior
Vice President, Legal & Corporate Secretary, Legal & Government
Affairs, NYSE Euronext, dated January 3, 2012 (``Exchanges' Response
Letter I'').
\10\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchanges propose to modify the
proposals as follows: (1) To state that Retail Member Organizations
may receive free executions for their retail orders and the fees and
credits for liquidity providers and Retail Member Organizations
would be determined based on experience with the Retail Liquidity
Program in the first several months; (2) to correct a typographical
error referring to the amount of minimum price improvement on a 500
share order; (3) to indicate the Retail Liquidity Identifier would
be initially available on each Exchange's proprietary data feeds,
and would be later available on the public market data stream; and
(4) to limit the Retail Liquidity Program to securities that trade
at prices equal to or greater than $1 per share.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 27509]]
On February 7, 2012, the Commission instituted proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule changes, as modified
by Amendments No. 1.\11\ On February 16, 2012, the Exchanges each filed
Partial Amendment No. 2 to their proposals, which the Commission
published for comment in the Federal Register on March 1, 2012
(``Notice of Partial Amendment No. 2'').\12\ In response to the Order
Instituting Proceedings and the Notice of Partial Amendment No. 2, the
Commission received four additional comment letters on the
proposals.\13\ On March 20, 2012, the Exchanges submitted a
consolidated rebuttal letter in response to the Order Instituting
Proceedings.\14\ Additionally, on April 10, 2012, the Exchanges
submitted a consolidated response to the comments concerning Partial
Amendments No. 2.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66346, 77 FR 7628
(February 13, 2012) (``Order Instituting Proceedings'').
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66464 (February 24,
2012), 77 FR 12629.
\13\ See Letters to the Commission from Leonard Amoruso, General
Counsel, Knight Capital, Inc., dated March 7, 2012 (``Knight Letter
II''); Kurt Schact, CFA, Managing Director, Rhodri Preece, CFA,
Director, Capital Markets Policy, and James Allen, CFA, Head,
Capital Markets Policy, CFA Institute, dated March 21, 2012 (``CFA
Letter II''); Ann Vlcek, Director and Associate General Counsel,
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, dated March
23, 2012 (``SIFMA Letter II''); and Jim Toes, President and CEO, and
Jennifer Green Setzenfand, Chairman, Security Traders Association,
dated April 26, 2012.
\14\ See Letter to the Commission from Janet McGinnis, Senior
Vice President, Legal & Corporate Secretary, Legal & Government
Affairs, NYSE Euronext, dated March 20, 2012 (``Exchanges' Response
Letter II'').
\15\ See Letter to the Commission from Janet McGinnis, Senior
Vice President, Legal & Corporate Secretary, Legal & Government
Affairs, NYSE Euronext, dated April 10, 2012 (``Exchanges' Response
Letter III'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \16\ provides that, after initiating
disapproval proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving
or disapproving the proposed rule changes not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of their filing. The Commission may
extend the period for issuing an order approving or disapproving the
proposed rule changes, however, by up to 60 days if the Commission
determines that a longer period is appropriate and publishes the
reasons for such determination. In this case, the proposed rule changes
were published for notice and comment in the Federal Register on
November 9, 2011; May 7, 2012, is 180 days from that date, and July 6,
2012, is 240 days from that date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed
rule changes so that it has sufficient time to consider the Program and
the issues that commenters have raised concerning the Program.
Specifically, as the Commission noted in the Order Instituting
Proceedings, the Program raises several notable issues, including
whether the Program is consistent with the Sub-Penny Rule and with the
Quote Rule. The Commission's resolution of these issues could have an
impact on overall market structure. As a result, the Commission
continues to consider whether the proposed rule changes are consistent
with these particular Regulation NMS Rules and with the Act.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\17\ designates July 6, 2012, as the date by which the Commission
shall either approve or disapprove the proposed rule changes (File Nos.
SR-NYSE-2011-55 and SR-NYSEAmex-2011-84).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-11247 Filed 5-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P