Stevens Institute of Technology, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope, 27436-27437 [2012-11226]

Download as PDF 27436 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 91 / Thursday, May 10, 2012 / Notices Final Results of Review The dumping margin for the POR is as follows: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have made certain revisions to the margin calculation for TAFISHCO. For the reasons explained in the I&D Memo at Comment I, we have changed our primary surrogate country selection from Indonesia to Bangladesh. For all other changes to the calculation of TAFISHCO, see the I&D Memo and company-specific analysis memorandum. For changes to the surrogate values, see the I&D Memo and ‘‘Memorandum to the File, through Matthew Renkey, Acting Program Manager, AC/CVD Operations, Office 9, from Emeka Chukwudebe, Case Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Antidumping New Shipper Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Surrogate Values for the Final Results,’’ dated May 3, 2012. for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’): (1) For subject merchandise produced and exported by TAFISHCO, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the final results of this new shipper review. If the cash deposit rate calculated in the final results is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required for the specific producerexporter combination listed above; (2) for subject merchandise exported by TAFISHCO, but not manufactured by TAFISHCO, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the Vietnam-wide rate (i.e., $2.11/Kilogram); and (3) for subject merchandise manufactured by TAFISHCO, but exported by any other party, the cash deposit rate will be the Vietnam-wide rate (i.e., $2.11/ Kilogram). The cash deposit requirement, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Reimbursement of Duties 17:18 May 09, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Appendix I—Issues & Decision Memorandum COMMENT I: SELECTION OF SURROGATE COUNTRY A. Economic Comparability B. Significant Producer of the Comparable Merchandise C. Data Considerations COMMENT II: SURROGATE VALUES A. Financial Ratios B. Fish Waste C. Fingerlings, Fish Feed, Nutrients, Lime D. Salt E. STPP, CO Gas, PE Bags, Cartons, Tape, Label, Plastic Sheet, Banding, Diesel F. Labor G. Brokerage & Handling COMMENT III: CORRECTION OF PRELIMINARY MARGIN CALCULATION [FR Doc. 2012–11218 Filed 5–9–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their Weightedresponsibility under 19 CFR average 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Manufacturer/exporter margin regarding the reimbursement of (dollars per kilogram) antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Thuan An Production Trading & Services Co., Ltd ..... 0.00 Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of Assessment antidumping duties has occurred and Upon issuance of the final results, the the subsequent assessment of doubled Department will determine, and CBP antidumping duties. shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department Administrative Protective Order intends to issue assessment instructions In accordance with 19 CFR to CBP 15 days after the date of 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as publication of the final results of a reminder to parties subject to review. Pursuant to 19 CFR administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate of their responsibility concerning the importer-specific (or customer) ad valorem duty assessment rates based on return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO, the ratio of the total amount of the dumping margins calculated for the which continues to govern business examined sales to the total entered proprietary information in this segment value of those same sales. In accordance of the proceeding. Timely written with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will notification of the return/destruction of instruct CBP to liquidate, without regard APO materials or conversion to judicial to antidumping duties, all entries of protective order is hereby requested. subject merchandise during the POR for Failure to comply with the regulations which the importer-specific assessment and terms of an APO is a violation rate is zero or de minimis. subject to sanction. Cash Deposit Requirements We are issuing and publishing this new shipper review and notice in The following cash deposit accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and requirements will be effective upon 777(i) of the Act. publication of the final results of this new shipper review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from Vietnam entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, VerDate Mar<15>2010 Dated: May 3, 2012. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. International Trade Administration Stevens Institute of Technology, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC Docket Number: 12–008. Applicant: Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Instrument: Quanta 450 Scanning Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012. Docket Number: 12–009. Applicant: Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521. Instrument: Quanta 250 Scanning Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012. Docket Number: 12–010. Applicant: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Instrument: Tecnai G2 F20T Transmission Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012. E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 91 / Thursday, May 10, 2012 / Notices Docket Number: 12–012. Applicant: Alliance for Sustainable Energy, Golden, CO 80401–3305. Instrument: Tecnai G2 20 S–TWIN Transmission Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012. Docket Number: 12–014. Applicant: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. Instrument: Nova NanoSEM 450 Scanning Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012. Docket Number: 12–015. Applicant: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588. Instrument: Nova NanoSEM 450 Scanning Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012. Docket Number: 12–016. Applicant: University of Nebraska- Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588. Instrument: Tecnai Osiris Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of each instrument. Dated: May 1, 2012. Gregory W. Campbell, Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2012–11226 Filed 5–9–12; 8:45 am] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:18 May 09, 2012 Jkt 226001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–984] Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People’s Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: DATES: Effective Date: May 10, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Subler or Hermes Pinilla, AD/ CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0189 or (202) 482– 3477, respectively. Background On March 21, 2012, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated an investigation of drawn stainless steel sink from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 77 FR 18211 (March 27, 2012). Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later than May 25, 2012. Postponement of Due Date for Preliminary Determination Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the Department to issue the preliminary determination in a countervailing duty investigation within 65 days after the date on which the Department initiated the investigation. However, if the Department concludes that the parties concerned in the investigation are cooperating and determines that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated, section 703(c)(1)(B) of the Act allows the Department to postpone making the preliminary determination until no later than 130 days after the date on which the administering authority initiates an investigation. The Department finds that the instant case is extraordinarily complicated because of the number and complexity of the alleged countervailable subsidy practices, and the need to determine the extent to which particular countervailable subsidies are used by individual manufacturers, producers, and exporters. In addition, the Department finds that the parties thus far identified in the investigation are PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27437 cooperating. Therefore, the Department is extending the due date for the preliminary determination by 130 days after the day on which the investigation was initiated (i.e., until July 29, 2012). However, July 29, 2012, falls on a Sunday. It is the Department’s longstanding practice to issue a determination the next business day when the statutory deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday, or any other day when the Department is closed. See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). Accordingly, the deadline for completion of the preliminary determination is no later than July 30, 2012. As the Department is aware, Section 703(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f) state that if the Department postpones the preliminary determination, it will notify all parties to the proceeding no later than 20 days prior to the scheduled date of the preliminary determination. The Department acknowledges that it inadvertently missed this deadline. The Department received numerous comments regarding the respondent selection, which delayed the issuance of questionnaires, and intended to extend the deadline to issue the preliminary determination, but due to the administrative oversight we did not complete an extension notice on time. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f). Dated: May 4, 2012. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2012–11341 Filed 5–9–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–921] Lightweight Thermal Paper From the People’s Republic of China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: May 10, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Chappell or Mary Kolberg, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27436-27437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Stevens Institute of Technology, et al.; Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by
    Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can 
be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department 
of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC
    Docket Number: 12-008. Applicant: Stevens Institute of Technology, 
Hoboken, NJ 07030. Instrument: Quanta 450 Scanning Electron Microscope. 
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 
77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012.
    Docket Number: 12-009. Applicant: Humboldt State University, 
Arcata, CA 95521. Instrument: Quanta 250 Scanning Electron Microscope. 
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 
77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012.
    Docket Number: 12-010. Applicant: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 
Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Instrument: Tecnai G2 F20T Transmission Electron 
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: 
See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012.

[[Page 27437]]

    Docket Number: 12-012. Applicant: Alliance for Sustainable Energy, 
Golden, CO 80401-3305. Instrument: Tecnai G2 20 S-TWIN Transmission 
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. 
Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012.
    Docket Number: 12-014. Applicant: California Institute of 
Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. Instrument: Nova NanoSEM 450 Scanning 
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. 
Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012.
    Docket Number: 12-015. Applicant: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 
Lincoln, NE 68588. Instrument: Nova NanoSEM 450 Scanning Electron 
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: 
See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012.
    Docket Number: 12-016. Applicant: University of Nebraska- Lincoln, 
Lincoln, NE 68588. Instrument: Tecnai Osiris Field Emission Scanning 
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. 
Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 20360, April 4, 2012.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and 
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an 
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.

    Dated: May 1, 2012.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-11226 Filed 5-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.