Certain Semiconductor Chips Having Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory Controllers and Products Containing Same; Determination Rescinding the Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders, 26789 [2012-10834]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2012 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–661]
Certain Semiconductor Chips Having
Synchronous Dynamic Random
Access Memory Controllers and
Products Containing Same;
Determination Rescinding the
Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist
Orders
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to rescind
the exclusion order and cease and desist
orders issued in the above-captioned
investigation.
SUMMARY:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2532. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on December 10, 2008, based on a
complaint filed by Rambus Inc. of Los
Altos, California (‘‘Rambus’’), alleging a
violation of section 337 in the
infringement of certain patents. 73 FR
75131. The principal respondent was
NVIDIA Corporation of Santa Clara,
California (‘‘NVIDIA’’). Joining NVIDIA
as respondents were approximately
twenty of NVIDIA’s customers. The
Commission found a violation of section
337 by reason of the infringement of
some of the asserted patents, and on
July 26, 2010, the Commission issued a
limited exclusion order. 75 FR 44989–
90 (July 30, 2010). The Commission also
issued cease and desist orders against
those respondents who maintained
significant inventory of the accused
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 May 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
products in the United States: NVIDIA;
Hewlett-Packard Co. of Palo Alto,
California; ASUS Computer
International, Inc. of Peitou Taipei,
Taiwan; Palit Multimedia Inc. of
Ontario, Canada; Palit Microsystems
Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; MSI Computer
Corp. of City of Industry, California;
Micro-Star International of Taipei,
Taiwan; EVGA Corp. of Brea, California;
DiabloTek, Inc. of Alhambra, California;
Biostar Microtech Corp. of City of
Industry, California; and BFG
Technologies, Inc. of Lake Forest,
Illinois. Id. The parties appealed the
Commission determination to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rambus and NVIDIA have since
settled their patent dispute, and on
February 10, 2012, jointly moved to
rescind the Commission’s remedial
orders on the basis of settlement. No
oppositions were filed. In addition, on
April 3, 2012, the court of appeals
dismissed the last-remaining appeal of
the Commission determination, in an
order that remanded the appeal ‘‘to the
ITC with instructions to vacate the
exclusion orders at issue in this
appeal.’’ Order at 3.
The Commission has determined to
rescind the exclusion order and cease
and desist orders.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.76 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.76).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 1, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–10834 Filed 5–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Settlement
Agreement Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on April
30, 2012, a proposed Consent Decree
and Settlement Agreement (the ‘‘Lower
Ley Creek Non-Owned Site Settlement
Agreement’’) in the bankruptcy matter,
In re Motors Liquidation Corp, et al., f/
k/a General Motors Corp., et al., Jointly
Administered Case No. 09–50026 (REG),
was lodged with the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York. The Parties to the
Lower Ley Creek Non-Owned Site
Settlement Agreement are the Motors
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26789
Liquidation General Unsecured
Creditors Trust (‘‘Old GM’’), the State of
New York, and the United States of
America. The Lower Ley Creek NonOwned Site Settlement Agreement
resolves claims and causes of action of
the Environmental Protection Agency
(‘‘EPA’’) against Old GM under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675,
with respect to the portion of Ley Creek
that is downstream from the Route 11
Bridge at the Onondaga Lake Superfund
Site in New York.
Under the Lower Ley Creek NonOwned Site Settlement Agreement, EPA
will receive an allowed general
unsecured claim of $38,344,177, and the
State of New York will receive an
allowed general unsecured claim of
$859,257.
The Department of Justice will
receive, for a period of thirty (30) days
from the date of this publication,
comments relating to the Lower Ley
Creek Non-Owned Site Settlement
Agreement. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and either emailed
to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to In re
Motors Liquidation Corp., et al., D.J. Ref.
90–11–3–09754.
The Non-Owned Site Settlement
Agreement may be examined at the
Office of the United States Attorney, 86
Chambers Street, 3rd Floor, New York,
New York 10007, and at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel
Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.
During the public comment period, the
Lower Ley Creek Non-Owned Site
Settlement Agreement may also be
examined on the following Department
of Justice Web site, https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. Copies of the
Lower Ley Creek Non-Owned Site
Settlement Agreement may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or emailing a
request to ‘‘Consent Decree Copy’’
(EESCDCopy.ENRD@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–5271. If requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library
by mail, please enclose a check in the
amount of $5.50 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
Treasury or, if by email or fax, please
forward a check in that amount to the
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 26789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10834]
[[Page 26789]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-661]
Certain Semiconductor Chips Having Synchronous Dynamic Random
Access Memory Controllers and Products Containing Same; Determination
Rescinding the Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to rescind the exclusion order and cease and
desist orders issued in the above-captioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on December 10, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Rambus Inc. of Los
Altos, California (``Rambus''), alleging a violation of section 337 in
the infringement of certain patents. 73 FR 75131. The principal
respondent was NVIDIA Corporation of Santa Clara, California
(``NVIDIA''). Joining NVIDIA as respondents were approximately twenty
of NVIDIA's customers. The Commission found a violation of section 337
by reason of the infringement of some of the asserted patents, and on
July 26, 2010, the Commission issued a limited exclusion order. 75 FR
44989-90 (July 30, 2010). The Commission also issued cease and desist
orders against those respondents who maintained significant inventory
of the accused products in the United States: NVIDIA; Hewlett-Packard
Co. of Palo Alto, California; ASUS Computer International, Inc. of
Peitou Taipei, Taiwan; Palit Multimedia Inc. of Ontario, Canada; Palit
Microsystems Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; MSI Computer Corp. of City of
Industry, California; Micro-Star International of Taipei, Taiwan; EVGA
Corp. of Brea, California; DiabloTek, Inc. of Alhambra, California;
Biostar Microtech Corp. of City of Industry, California; and BFG
Technologies, Inc. of Lake Forest, Illinois. Id. The parties appealed
the Commission determination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit.
Rambus and NVIDIA have since settled their patent dispute, and on
February 10, 2012, jointly moved to rescind the Commission's remedial
orders on the basis of settlement. No oppositions were filed. In
addition, on April 3, 2012, the court of appeals dismissed the last-
remaining appeal of the Commission determination, in an order that
remanded the appeal ``to the ITC with instructions to vacate the
exclusion orders at issue in this appeal.'' Order at 3.
The Commission has determined to rescind the exclusion order and
cease and desist orders.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210.76 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 210.76).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 1, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-10834 Filed 5-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P