Fresh Garlic From China; Determination, 26579 [2012-10743]

Download as PDF erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2012 / Notices Management Agency) to obtain additional supplemental water supplies. • Promote seasonal flexibility of deliveries to the Exchange Contractors through exchange with CVP and SWP agricultural service and M&I contractors wherein water would be delivered and then returned at a later date within the year. Reclamation’s RWSP needs additional water to provide the refuges with the increment between Level 2 and Level 4 water quantities for fish and wildlife habitat development. The Exchange Contractors propose to transfer CVP water for the production of agricultural crops or livestock and/or municipal and industrial uses because of water supply shortages or when full contract deliveries cannot otherwise be made. The water transfers would occur largely within the San Joaquin Valley of central California but could extend to districts taking water deliveries in the North Delta. The Exchange Contractors’ service area covers parts of Fresno, Madera, Merced, and Stanislaus counties. The agricultural water users that would benefit from the potential transfers are located in the counties of Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Merced, Madera, Fresno, San Benito, Santa Clara, Tulare, Kern, Kings, Contra Costa, Alameda, Monterey, and Santa Cruz counties. The wetland habitat areas that may receive the water are located in Merced, Fresno, Kings, Tulare, and Kern counties. Some of the resources potentially affected by transfers under the proposed twenty-five year transfer program that are evaluated in the Draft EIS/EIR include: surface water including the San Joaquin River, groundwater, biological resources, land uses including agricultural lands, air quality/climate change, socioeconomics including impacts to agricultural production, and environmental justice. Copies of the Draft EIS/EIR are available for public review at the following locations: • Bureau of Reclamation, Regional Library, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825–1898 • Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Office Library, P.O. Box 25007, Mail Code 84–21320, Denver, CO 80225– 0007 • California State Library, 914 Capitol Mall, Suite E–29, Sacramento, CA 95814–4802 • University of California, Berkeley, Water Resources Center Archives, 410 O’Brien Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720–1718 • University of California, Davis, Peter J. Shields Library, Documents Department, 100 Northwest Quad, Davis, CA 95616–5292 VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 May 03, 2012 Jkt 226001 • California Research Bureau, California State Library, PO Box 942837, Sacramento, CA 94237–0001 • Fresno County Public Library, Government Publications, 2420 Mariposa Street Fresno, CA 93721–2204 • Merced County Library, 2100 O Street, Merced, CA 95340–3637 • Merced County Public Library, 1312 South 7th Street, Los Banos, CA 93635– 4757 • Stanislaus County Library, 1500 I Street, Modesto, CA 95354 • San Francisco Public Library, Government Documents Department, 100 Larkin Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 Special Assistance for Public Meetings If special assistance is required to participate in the public meetings, please contact Mr. Brad Hubbard at 916–978–5204, TDD 916–978–5608, or via email at bhubbard@usbr.gov. Please notify Mr. Hubbard as far in advance as possible to enable Reclamation to secure the needed services. If a request cannot be honored, the requestor will be notified. A telephone device for the hearing impaired (TDD) is available at 916–978–5608. Public Disclosure Before including your name, address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: March 5, 2012. Pablo R. Arroyave, Deputy Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region. [FR Doc. 2012–10766 Filed 5–3–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–683 (Third Review)] Fresh Garlic From China; Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26579 Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted this review on September 1, 2011 (76 FR 54487) and determined on December 5, 2011 that it would conduct an expedited review (76 FR 78694, December 19, 2011). The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on April 27, 2012. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4316 (April 2012), entitled Fresh Garlic from China: Investigation No. 731–TA–683 (Third Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 27, 2012. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2012–10743 Filed 5–3–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–739] Certain Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters and Products Containing Same; Notice of Final Determination; Issuance of General Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined that a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337) has been shown to exist in the abovecaptioned investigation and has issued a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–2661. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM 04MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 26579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10743]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-683 (Third Review)]


Fresh Garlic From China; Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on fresh 
garlic from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence 
of material injury to an industry in the United States within a 
reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on September 1, 2011 (76 FR 
54487) and determined on December 5, 2011 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (76 FR 78694, December 19, 2011).
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the 
Secretary of Commerce on April 27, 2012. The views of the Commission 
are contained in USITC Publication 4316 (April 2012), entitled Fresh 
Garlic from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-683 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 27, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-10743 Filed 5-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.