Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 25199-25201 [2012-10165]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Notices
emergency is not possible. See 30 CFR
75.1506(c)(2), 75–1507, and 75–1508(a)
and (b). This ICR covers the refuge
alternatives portion of emergency
response plans and records for training,
examination, maintenance, and repair of
refuge alternatives and components.
This ICR has been classified as a
revision under the PRA merely to
acknowledge administrative decisions
to transfer burden for some information
collection requirements to other OMB
Control Numbers. The agency has made
no changes to the actual requirements.
This information collection is subject
to the PRA. A Federal agency generally
cannot conduct or sponsor a collection
of information, and the public is
generally not required to respond to an
information collection, unless it is
approved by the OMB under the PRA
and displays a currently valid OMB
Control Number. In addition,
notwithstanding any other provisions of
law, no person shall generally be subject
to penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information if the
collection of information does not
display a valid OMB Control Number.
See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The
DOL obtains OMB approval for this
information collection under Control
Number 1219–0146. The current OMB
approval is scheduled to expire on April
30, 2012; however, it should be noted
that existing information collection
requirements submitted to the OMB
receive a month-to-month extension
while they undergo review. For
additional information, see the related
notice published in the Federal Register
on January 31, 2012 (77 FR 4834).
Interested parties are encouraged to
send comments to the OMB, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs at
the address shown in the ADDRESSES
section within 30 days of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register. In
order to help ensure appropriate
consideration, comments should
reference OMB Control Number 1219–
0146. The OMB is particularly
interested in comments that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:44 Apr 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: DOL–MSHA.
Title of Collection: Refuge
Alternatives for Underground Coal
Mines.
OMB Control Number: 1219–0146.
Affected Public: Private Sector—
Businesses or Other For-Profits.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 55.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 127.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 951.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $218.
Dated: April 23, 2012.
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–10164 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of April 9, 2012
through April 13, 2012.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both,
of such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25199
(B) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) The increase in imports
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition
from a foreign country by the workers’
firm of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
25200
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Notices
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied to
the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) An affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the
1-year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) A summary of the report
submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under
section 202(f)(1) with respect to the
affirmative determination described in
paragraph (1)(A) is published in the
Federal Register under section 202(f)(3);
or
(B) Notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally
or partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) The 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
81,206 ...............
Stern-Leach, Cookson Precious Metals, Cookson America,
Adecco Staffing, Qualified, etc.
Hallmark Sweet, Cookson Precious Metals, Cookson America,
Adecco Staffing, Qualified, etc.
Stern Metals, Cookson Precious Metals, Cookson America,
Adecco Staffing, Qualified, etc.
SolarWorld Industries America LP, ProHire and Kelly Services ....
NCO Financial Systems, Inc., Innosource ......................................
Attleboro, MA ..............................
February 10, 2011.
Attleboro, MA ..............................
February 10, 2011.
Attleboro, MA ..............................
February 10, 2011.
Camarillo, CA .............................
Canonsburg, PA .........................
February 13, 2010.
February 2, 2011.
81,206A ............
81,206B ............
81,283 ...............
81,293 ...............
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
Impact date
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
81,274 ...............
Aosom LLC, Ningbo MH Industry Co., NW Staffing, Begin Right,
Office Team, etc.
Clipper Windpower, LLC, Accounts Payable Department, On-Site
Workers of Appleone and Accountemps.
Infinite Convergence Solutions, Inc., Messaging Software Division, Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc.
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Including On Site Leased Workers of Olsten, Adecco and HR Group.
Covidien, Medical Devices Sector, Vascular Therapies Division,
Kelly Services.
Nilfisk-Advance Incorporated, On Site: E-Technical, Apple One,
Ware Technology Services and Staffing.
Panduit Corporation, Tinley Park Manufacturing Division, On-Site
Workers from Aerotek, Inc.
Panduit Corporation, New Lenox Production Division, Cable Tie
Division, Areotek, Inc.
Becromal of America, Inc., Resource MFG ....................................
Vectron International .......................................................................
Albany International, Corrugated Belts Division .............................
KRACO Enterprises, LLC, A Subsidiary of Sun Capital Partners,
Inc.
Lake Oswego, OR ......................
January 26, 2011.
Carpinteria, CA ...........................
February 21, 2011.
Arlington Heights, IL ...................
February 27, 2011.
Greensboro, NC .........................
March 12, 2011.
Mansfield, MA .............................
March 13, 2011.
Plymouth, MN .............................
October 1, 2011.
Tinley Park, IL ............................
November 25, 2011.
New Lenox, IL ............................
November 25, 2011.
Clinton, TN .................................
Hudson, NH ................................
Albany, NY .................................
Compton, CA ..............................
March 15, 2011.
March 19, 2011.
May 22, 2012.
March 21, 2011.
81,358 ...............
81,367 ...............
81,408 ...............
81,415 ...............
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
81,417 ...............
81,419 ...............
81,419A ............
81,425
81,430
81,435
81,440
...............
...............
...............
...............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:44 Apr 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Impact date
25201
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
81,446 ...............
WellPoint, Inc., NE Enrollment and Billing Division, Aerotek, Kelly
and Populus Group.
Siltronic Corporation, FAB1 Plant, Express Temporaries and
Aerotek Commercial, etc.
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Wellpoint, Inc., Service Operations, Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Georgia.
Capewell Horsenails, Inc., Mustad USA, Premiere Staffing, Kelly
Staffing, Lauren Staffing, etc.
North Haven, CT ........................
March 22, 2011.
Portland, OR ...............................
March 28, 2011.
Richmond, VA ............................
April 29, 2011.
Bloomfield, CT ............................
March 27, 2011.
81,456 ...............
81,465 ...............
81,470 ...............
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)
TA–W No.
Bremner Food Group Inc ................................................................
Afni, Inc., Experis ............................................................................
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Location
TA–W No.
Shape Corporation ..........................................................................
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested
that the petition be withdrawn.
Subject firm
81,391 ...............
Location
TA–W No.
Flo-Pro, Inc., A Division of Introcan, Motor Parts of America, Inc ..
therefore, may not be part of a
petitioning worker group. For one or
more of these reasons, these petitions
were deemed invalid.
Subject firm
81,371 ...............
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
Location
Convergys Corporation, Microsoft Answer Desk Project ................
filed earlier covering the same
petitioners.
Subject firm
81,485 ...............
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the period
of April 9, 2012 through April 13, 2012.
These determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa
search form.cfm. under the searchable listing
of determinations or by calling the Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888–
365–6822.
Location
Impact date
Ogden, UT.
Dated: April 18, 2012.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–10165 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Impact date
Bedford, NH.
because the petitions are the subject of
ongoing investigations under petitions
TA–W No.
Impact date
Grand Haven, MI.
by at least three individuals of the
petitioning worker group. Petitioners
separated more than one year prior to
the date of the petition cannot be
covered under a certification of a
petition under Section 223(b), and
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not
filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every
petition filed by workers must be signed
Impact date
Fort Smith, AR.
San Antonio, TX.
on the Department’s Web site, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
Subject firm
81,427 ...............
81,433 ...............
Impact date
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:44 Apr 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25199-25201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10165]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
April 9, 2012 through April 13, 2012.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
[[Page 25200]]
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,206..................... Stern-Leach, Cookson Attleboro, MA........ February 10, 2011.
Precious Metals, Cookson
America, Adecco Staffing,
Qualified, etc.
81,206A.................... Hallmark Sweet, Cookson Attleboro, MA........ February 10, 2011.
Precious Metals, Cookson
America, Adecco Staffing,
Qualified, etc.
81,206B.................... Stern Metals, Cookson Attleboro, MA........ February 10, 2011.
Precious Metals, Cookson
America, Adecco Staffing,
Qualified, etc.
81,283..................... SolarWorld Industries Camarillo, CA........ February 13, 2010.
America LP, ProHire and
Kelly Services.
81,293..................... NCO Financial Systems, Canonsburg, PA....... February 2, 2011.
Inc., Innosource.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,274..................... Aosom LLC, Ningbo MH Lake Oswego, OR...... January 26, 2011.
Industry Co., NW
Staffing, Begin Right,
Office Team, etc.
81,358..................... Clipper Windpower, LLC, Carpinteria, CA...... February 21, 2011.
Accounts Payable
Department, On-Site
Workers of Appleone and
Accountemps.
81,367..................... Infinite Convergence Arlington Heights, IL February 27, 2011.
Solutions, Inc.,
Messaging Software
Division, Infinite
Computer Solutions, Inc.
81,408..................... Syngenta Crop Protection Greensboro, NC....... March 12, 2011.
LLC, Including On Site
Leased Workers of Olsten,
Adecco and HR Group.
81,415..................... Covidien, Medical Devices Mansfield, MA........ March 13, 2011.
Sector, Vascular
Therapies Division, Kelly
Services.
81,417..................... Nilfisk-Advance Plymouth, MN......... October 1, 2011.
Incorporated, On Site: E-
Technical, Apple One,
Ware Technology Services
and Staffing.
81,419..................... Panduit Corporation, Tinley Park, IL...... November 25, 2011.
Tinley Park Manufacturing
Division, On-Site Workers
from Aerotek, Inc.
81,419A.................... Panduit Corporation, New New Lenox, IL........ November 25, 2011.
Lenox Production
Division, Cable Tie
Division, Areotek, Inc.
81,425..................... Becromal of America, Inc., Clinton, TN.......... March 15, 2011.
Resource MFG.
81,430..................... Vectron International..... Hudson, NH........... March 19, 2011.
81,435..................... Albany International, Albany, NY........... May 22, 2012.
Corrugated Belts Division.
81,440..................... KRACO Enterprises, LLC, A Compton, CA.......... March 21, 2011.
Subsidiary of Sun Capital
Partners, Inc.
[[Page 25201]]
81,446..................... WellPoint, Inc., NE North Haven, CT...... March 22, 2011.
Enrollment and Billing
Division, Aerotek, Kelly
and Populus Group.
81,456..................... Siltronic Corporation, Portland, OR......... March 28, 2011.
FAB1 Plant, Express
Temporaries and Aerotek
Commercial, etc.
81,465..................... Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Richmond, VA......... April 29, 2011.
Shield, Wellpoint, Inc.,
Service Operations, Blue
Cross and Blue Shield in
Georgia.
81,470..................... Capewell Horsenails, Inc., Bloomfield, CT....... March 27, 2011.
Mustad USA, Premiere
Staffing, Kelly Staffing,
Lauren Staffing, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,427..................... Bremner Food Group Inc.... Fort Smith, AR.......
81,433..................... Afni, Inc., Experis....... San Antonio, TX......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,391..................... Shape Corporation......... Grand Haven, MI......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be
signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group.
Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the
petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under
Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker
group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed
invalid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,371..................... Flo-Pro, Inc., A Division Bedford, NH..........
of Introcan, Motor Parts
of America, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under
petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,485..................... Convergys Corporation, Ogden, UT............
Microsoft Answer Desk
Project.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of April 9, 2012 through April 13, 2012.
These determinations are available on the Department's Web site
tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm. under the searchable listing of
determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance toll free at 888-365-6822.
Dated: April 18, 2012.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-10165 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P