Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices, 24764-24766 [2012-9953]
Download as PDF
24764
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Notices
NHTSA has granted similar petitions
for noncompliance with seat belt
assembly installation and usage
instruction standards. Refer to Hyundai
Motor Company (74 FR 9125, March 2,
209); Ford Motor Company (73 FR
11462, March 3, 2008); Mazda North
America Operations (73 FR 11464,
March 3, 2008); Ford Motor Company
(73 FR 63051, October 22, 2008); Subaru
of America, Inc. (65 FR 67471,
November 9, 2000); Bombardier Motor
Corporation of America, Inc. (65 FR
60238, October 10, 2000); TRW, Inc. (58
FR 7171, February 4, 1993); and
Chrysler Corporation, (57 FR 45865,
October 5, 1992). In all of these cases,
the petitioners demonstrated that the
noncompliant seat belt assemblies were
properly installed, and due to their
respective replacement parts ordering
systems, improper replacement seat belt
assembly selection and installation
would not be likely to occur. Decision:
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that Mitsubishi has
met its burden of persuasion that the
FMVSS No. 209 noncompliance in the
replacement seat belts identified in
Mitsubishi’s Noncompliance
Information Report is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
Mitsubishi’s petition is granted and the
petitioner is exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of,
and a remedy for, that noncompliance
under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the replacement
seat belt assemblies that Mitsubishi no
longer controlled at the time that it
determined that a noncompliance
existed in the subject vehicles.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8).
Issued on: April 18, 2012.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012–9946 Filed 4–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Apr 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0053]
Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver
Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle
Electronic Devices
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Proposed Federal guidelines;
extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
On February 24, 2012,
NHTSA published proposed voluntary
NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines
for in-vehicle electronic devices. The
agency provided a 60-day comment
period. We received a petition from the
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
requesting an extension of the comment
period. The petitioner argued that
additional time was needed to review
information that was not placed in the
docket when the proposed NHTSA
Guidelines were published. After
considering the petition, we are
extending the comment period by
24 days, from April 24, 2012, to
May 18, 2012.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed NHTSA Guidelines published
February 24, 2012, at 77 FR 11200, is
extended. You should submit your
comments early enough to ensure that
the docket receives them not later than
May 18, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to the docket number identified in the
heading of this document by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments, see the Public
Participation heading of the
Supplementary Information section of
this document. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ heading
below.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
DocketInfo.dot.gov.
Confidential Business Information: If
you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building 4th Floor,
Room W41–318, Washington, DC 20590.
In addition, you should submit two
copies, from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business
information, to Docket Management at
the address given above. When you send
a comment containing information
claimed to be confidential business
information, you should include a cover
letter setting forth the information
specified in our confidential business
information regulation (49 CFR Part
512).
Docket: For access to the Docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the Docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical issues, you may contact Dr. W.
Riley Garrott, Vehicle Research and Test
Center, telephone: (937) 666–3312,
facsimile: (937) 666–3590. You may
send mail to this person at: The
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, Vehicle Research and
Test Center, P.O. Box B–37, East Liberty,
OH 43319.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 24, 2012, NHTSA published in
the Federal Register a notice proposing
voluntary NHTSA Driver Distraction
Guidelines for in-vehicle electronic
devices (77 FR 11200). The proposed
NHTSA Guidelines are meant to
promote safety by discouraging the
introduction of excessively distracting
devices in vehicles. These NHTSA
Guidelines, which are voluntary, apply
to communications, entertainment,
information gathering, and navigation
devices or functions that are not
required to operate the vehicle safely
and that are operated by the driver
through visual-manual means (meaning
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the driver looking at a device,
manipulating a device-related control
with the driver’s hand, and watching for
visual feedback). We provided a 60-day
comment period.
In a petition dated March 9, 2012,1
the Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers (Alliance) requested that
certain information, including several
research reports referenced in the
notice, be placed in the docket. The
Alliance also requested that a public
workshop be held to provide an
opportunity for all interested parties to
gain a better understanding of the
technical details supporting the
proposed Guidelines and to share
advanced technical information in an
effective manner in order to help the
agency as it reviews comments and
works to finalize the Guidelines. The
Alliance requested an extension of the
comment period by at least an
additional 60 days from the date that all
the supporting research and data were
submitted into the public docket or from
the date of any technical workshop,
whichever was later.
On March 23, 2012, NHTSA held a
public workshop at its Vehicle Research
and Test Center in East Liberty, Ohio, to
provide interested parties with an
opportunity to discuss issues relevant to
the technical aspects of the proposed
NHTSA Guidelines. The workshop
included brief NHTSA presentations
outlining the content and basis of the
proposed Guidelines and presentations
from attendees. The presentations and
written comments from the workshop
were placed in the docket on April 9,
2012.2 The four research reports cited in
the proposed Guidelines but not
initially included in the docket are
expected to be available in the docket in
late April or early May 2012.3
After considering the petition from
the Alliance, we have decided to extend
the comment period by 24 days. We
wish to facilitate the efforts of the
petitioner and other interested persons
to provide complete comments. We
1 Alliance Petition, Docket No. NHTSA–2010–
0053–0015.
2 Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0053–0045.
Additional information regarding the classification
of the police-reported crash data in Table 1 of the
February 24, 2012 notice was also placed in the
Docket on April 9, 2012. Docket No. NHTSA–2010–
0053–0046.
3 The titles of the four reports are: An
Examination of the Definition of ‘‘Task’’ and Use of
‘‘Tax Taxonomies’’ Based on Interviews with
Experts; Summary of Radio Tuning Effects on
Visual and Driving Performance Measures—
Simulator and Test Track Studies; Driver Eye
Glance Behavior During Visual-Manual Secondary
Task Performance: Occlusion Method Versus
Simulated Driving; and Explanatory Material about
the Definition of a Task Used in NHTSA’s Driver
Distraction Guidelines, and Task Examples.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Apr 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
believe that a 24-day extension will
ensure that interested persons have
sufficient time to analyze the relevant
research reports and information
presented at the technical workshop.
The workshop was held on March 23,
and the presentations and written
comments from the workshop were
placed in the docket on April 9. With
the extension considered, all interested
persons will have had approximately six
weeks to review the information
presented at the workshop before the
end of the comment period.
Additionally, all four reports referenced
in the proposed Guidelines and noted in
the Alliance’s petition are expected to
be available in the docket in late April
or early May 2012. Given the agency’s
schedule for placing these reports in the
docket, we expect that all interested
persons will, with the extension
considered, have had approximately one
and a half to three and a half weeks to
review these reports before the end of
the comment period. This range of time
reflects the fact that the reports will be
individually placed in the docket as
they are finalized so that interested
persons can have access to them as soon
as possible. Additionally, to the extent
possible, we will consider comments
that Docket Management receives after
the close of the comment period.
The Alliance did not provide any
detailed information showing why a
longer extension, such as its suggestion
of 60 days from the docketing of the
research reports or date of the public
workshop, would be necessary.
Public Participation
How do I prepare and submit
comments?
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the
docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your
comments.
Your comments must not be more
than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21). We
established this limit to encourage you
to write your primary comments in a
concise fashion. However, you may
attach necessary additional documents
to your comments. There is no limit on
the length of the attachments.
Comments may be submitted to the
docket electronically by logging onto the
docket Management System Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
You may also submit two copies of
your comments, including the
attachments, to docket Management at
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24765
the address given above under
ADDRESSES.
Please note that pursuant to the Data
Quality Act, in order for substantive
data to be relied upon and used by the
agency, it must meet the information
quality standards set forth in the OMB
and DOT Data Quality Act guidelines.
Accordingly, we encourage you to
consult the guidelines in preparing your
comments. OMB’s guidelines may be
accessed at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
omb/fedreg/reproducible.html. DOT’s
guidelines may be accessed at https://
www.bts.gov/programs/
statistical_policy_and_research/
data_quality_guidelines/.
How can I be sure that my comments
were received?
If you wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your
comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope
containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
How do I submit confidential business
information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building 4th Floor,
Room W41–318, Washington, DC 20590.
In addition, you should submit two
copies, from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business
information, to Docket Management at
the address given above under
ADDRESSES. When you send a comment
containing information claimed to be
confidential business information, you
should include a cover letter setting
forth the information specified in our
confidential business information
regulation. (49 CFR Part 512.)
Will the agency consider late
comments?
We will consider all comments that
Docket Management receives before the
close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above under
DATES. To the extent possible, we will
also consider comments that Docket
Management receives after that date.
How can I read the comments submitted
by other people?
You may read the comments received
by Docket Management at the address
given above under ADDRESSES. The
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
24766
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Notices
hours of the docket are indicated above
in the same location. You may also see
the comments on the Internet. To read
the comments on the Internet, go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for accessing the
docket.
Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the docket
as it becomes available. Further, some
people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically check the docket for new
material.
Issued on: April 19, 2012.
John Maddox,
Associate Administrator for Vehicle Safety
Research.
[FR Doc. 2012–9953 Filed 4–20–12; 4:15 pm]
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Apr 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF
PEACE
Call for Proposals for a Micro Support
Program on International Conflict
Resolution and Peacebuilding For
Immediate Release
AGENCY:
ACTION:
United States Institute of Peace.
Notice.
Micro Support Program on
International Conflict Resolution and
Peacebuilding. The United States
Institute of Peace (USIP) requests
proposals to develop and manage a new
micro support initiative for projects
undertaken at institutions of higher
learning and public libraries in the
United States. The program will require
the contractor to design and implement
a formal competition, review and
recommend projects for funding, and
provide financial and report
management oversight.
Deadline: Friday, May 11, 2012 at 3
p.m. EDT.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Response Deadline: Friday, May
11, 2012 at 3 p.m. EDT
April 16, 2012—Issue Request for
Proposals
May 11, 2012—RFP submissions due by
3 p.m.
May 14–25, 2012—Review submissions
and selection of successful
organization
May 29, 2012—Announce results of
selection process.
ADDRESSES: United States Institute of
Peace, 2301 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20037, (202) 429–3842
(phone), (202) 833–1018 (fax), (202)
457–1719 (TTY), Email:
grants@usip.org.
DATES:
The
Grant Program • Micro Support
Program, Phone (202) 429–3842, Email:
grants@usip.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: April 17, 2012.
Michael Graham,
Senior Vice President for Management.
[FR Doc. 2012–9822 Filed 4–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–AR–P
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24764-24766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9953]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0053]
Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle
Electronic Devices
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Proposed Federal guidelines; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On February 24, 2012, NHTSA published proposed voluntary NHTSA
Driver Distraction Guidelines for in-vehicle electronic devices. The
agency provided a 60-day comment period. We received a petition from
the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers requesting an extension of the
comment period. The petitioner argued that additional time was needed
to review information that was not placed in the docket when the
proposed NHTSA Guidelines were published. After considering the
petition, we are extending the comment period by 24 days, from April
24, 2012, to May 18, 2012.
DATES: The comment period for the proposed NHTSA Guidelines published
February 24, 2012, at 77 FR 11200, is extended. You should submit your
comments early enough to ensure that the docket receives them not later
than May 18, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to the docket number identified in
the heading of this document by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments, see
the Public Participation heading of the Supplementary Information
section of this document. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the ``Privacy Act'' heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://DocketInfo.dot.gov.
Confidential Business Information: If you wish to submit any
information under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit three
copies of your complete submission, including the information you claim
to be confidential business information, to the Chief Counsel, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building 4th Floor, Room W41-318, Washington, DC 20590. In addition,
you should submit two copies, from which you have deleted the claimed
confidential business information, to Docket Management at the address
given above. When you send a comment containing information claimed to
be confidential business information, you should include a cover letter
setting forth the information specified in our confidential business
information regulation (49 CFR Part 512).
Docket: For access to the Docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
Docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical issues, you may contact
Dr. W. Riley Garrott, Vehicle Research and Test Center, telephone:
(937) 666-3312, facsimile: (937) 666-3590. You may send mail to this
person at: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Vehicle
Research and Test Center, P.O. Box B-37, East Liberty, OH 43319.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 24, 2012, NHTSA published in the
Federal Register a notice proposing voluntary NHTSA Driver Distraction
Guidelines for in-vehicle electronic devices (77 FR 11200). The
proposed NHTSA Guidelines are meant to promote safety by discouraging
the introduction of excessively distracting devices in vehicles. These
NHTSA Guidelines, which are voluntary, apply to communications,
entertainment, information gathering, and navigation devices or
functions that are not required to operate the vehicle safely and that
are operated by the driver through visual-manual means (meaning
[[Page 24765]]
the driver looking at a device, manipulating a device-related control
with the driver's hand, and watching for visual feedback). We provided
a 60-day comment period.
In a petition dated March 9, 2012,\1\ the Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers (Alliance) requested that certain information, including
several research reports referenced in the notice, be placed in the
docket. The Alliance also requested that a public workshop be held to
provide an opportunity for all interested parties to gain a better
understanding of the technical details supporting the proposed
Guidelines and to share advanced technical information in an effective
manner in order to help the agency as it reviews comments and works to
finalize the Guidelines. The Alliance requested an extension of the
comment period by at least an additional 60 days from the date that all
the supporting research and data were submitted into the public docket
or from the date of any technical workshop, whichever was later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Alliance Petition, Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0053-0015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 23, 2012, NHTSA held a public workshop at its Vehicle
Research and Test Center in East Liberty, Ohio, to provide interested
parties with an opportunity to discuss issues relevant to the technical
aspects of the proposed NHTSA Guidelines. The workshop included brief
NHTSA presentations outlining the content and basis of the proposed
Guidelines and presentations from attendees. The presentations and
written comments from the workshop were placed in the docket on April
9, 2012.\2\ The four research reports cited in the proposed Guidelines
but not initially included in the docket are expected to be available
in the docket in late April or early May 2012.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0053-0045. Additional information
regarding the classification of the police-reported crash data in
Table 1 of the February 24, 2012 notice was also placed in the
Docket on April 9, 2012. Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0053-0046.
\3\ The titles of the four reports are: An Examination of the
Definition of ``Task'' and Use of ``Tax Taxonomies'' Based on
Interviews with Experts; Summary of Radio Tuning Effects on Visual
and Driving Performance Measures--Simulator and Test Track Studies;
Driver Eye Glance Behavior During Visual-Manual Secondary Task
Performance: Occlusion Method Versus Simulated Driving; and
Explanatory Material about the Definition of a Task Used in NHTSA's
Driver Distraction Guidelines, and Task Examples.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After considering the petition from the Alliance, we have decided
to extend the comment period by 24 days. We wish to facilitate the
efforts of the petitioner and other interested persons to provide
complete comments. We believe that a 24-day extension will ensure that
interested persons have sufficient time to analyze the relevant
research reports and information presented at the technical workshop.
The workshop was held on March 23, and the presentations and written
comments from the workshop were placed in the docket on April 9. With
the extension considered, all interested persons will have had
approximately six weeks to review the information presented at the
workshop before the end of the comment period. Additionally, all four
reports referenced in the proposed Guidelines and noted in the
Alliance's petition are expected to be available in the docket in late
April or early May 2012. Given the agency's schedule for placing these
reports in the docket, we expect that all interested persons will, with
the extension considered, have had approximately one and a half to
three and a half weeks to review these reports before the end of the
comment period. This range of time reflects the fact that the reports
will be individually placed in the docket as they are finalized so that
interested persons can have access to them as soon as possible.
Additionally, to the extent possible, we will consider comments that
Docket Management receives after the close of the comment period.
The Alliance did not provide any detailed information showing why a
longer extension, such as its suggestion of 60 days from the docketing
of the research reports or date of the public workshop, would be
necessary.
Public Participation
How do I prepare and submit comments?
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your comments.
Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21).
We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary
comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary
additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length
of the attachments.
Comments may be submitted to the docket electronically by logging
onto the docket Management System Web site at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
You may also submit two copies of your comments, including the
attachments, to docket Management at the address given above under
ADDRESSES.
Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in order for
substantive data to be relied upon and used by the agency, it must meet
the information quality standards set forth in the OMB and DOT Data
Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you to consult the
guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB's guidelines may be accessed
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/reproducible.html. DOT's
guidelines may be accessed at https://www.bts.gov/programs/statistical_policy_and_research/data_quality_guidelines/.
How can I be sure that my comments were received?
If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of
your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the
envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by mail.
How do I submit confidential business information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief Counsel, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 4th
Floor, Room W41-318, Washington, DC 20590. In addition, you should
submit two copies, from which you have deleted the claimed confidential
business information, to Docket Management at the address given above
under ADDRESSES. When you send a comment containing information claimed
to be confidential business information, you should include a cover
letter setting forth the information specified in our confidential
business information regulation. (49 CFR Part 512.)
Will the agency consider late comments?
We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives
before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider
comments that Docket Management receives after that date.
How can I read the comments submitted by other people?
You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the
address given above under ADDRESSES. The
[[Page 24766]]
hours of the docket are indicated above in the same location. You may
also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments on the
Internet, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket.
Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will
continue to file relevant information in the docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly,
we recommend that you periodically check the docket for new material.
Issued on: April 19, 2012.
John Maddox,
Associate Administrator for Vehicle Safety Research.
[FR Doc. 2012-9953 Filed 4-20-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P