Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 24461-24462 [2012-9826]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation,
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended.
Dated: April 17, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–9819 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–853]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From Canada: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 7, 2012, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on citric
acid and certain citrate salts from
Canada. The review covers one
manufacturer/exporter of the subject
merchandise: Jungbunzlauer Canada
Inc. (JBL Canada). The period of review
(POR) is May 1, 2010, through April 30,
2011.
No interested party submitted
comments on the preliminary results.
We have made no changes to the margin
calculation for the final results of this
review. Therefore, the final results do
not differ from the preliminary results.
The final weighted-average dumping
margin for JBL Canada is listed below in
the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of
this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:40 Apr 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482–
4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The review covers one manufacturer/
exporter of the subject merchandise: JBL
Canada.
On February 7, 2012, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on citric acid and certain citrate salts
from Canada. See Citric Acid and
Certain Citrate Salts from Canada:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 6061
(February 7, 2012) (Preliminary Results).
We invited parties to comment on the
preliminary results of the review. No
interested party submitted comments.
The Department has conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order includes all
grades and granulation sizes of citric
acid, sodium citrate, and potassium
citrate in their unblended forms,
whether dry or in solution, and
regardless of packaging type. The scope
also includes blends of citric acid,
sodium citrate, and potassium citrate; as
well as blends with other ingredients,
such as sugar, where the unblended
form(s) of citric acid, sodium citrate,
and potassium citrate constitute 40
percent or more, by weight, of the blend.
The scope of this order also includes all
forms of crude calcium citrate,
including dicalcium citrate
monohydrate, and tricalcium citrate
tetrahydrate, which are intermediate
products in the production of citric
acid, sodium citrate, and potassium
citrate. The scope of this order does not
include calcium citrate that satisfies the
standards set forth in the United States
Pharmacopeia and has been mixed with
a functional excipient, such as dextrose
or starch, where the excipient
constitutes at least 2 percent, by weight,
of the product. The scope of this order
includes the hydrous and anhydrous
forms of citric acid, the dihydrate and
anhydrous forms of sodium citrate,
otherwise known as citric acid sodium
salt, and the monohydrate and
monopotassium forms of potassium
citrate. Sodium citrate also includes
both trisodium citrate and monosodium
citrate, which are also known as citric
acid trisodium salt and citric acid
monosodium salt, respectively. Citric
acid and sodium citrate are classifiable
under 2918.14.0000 and 2918.15.1000 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24461
United States (HTSUS), respectively.
Potassium citrate and crude calcium
citrate are classifiable under
2918.15.5000 and 3824.90.9290 of the
HTSUS, respectively. Blends that
include citric acid, sodium citrate, and
potassium citrate are classifiable under
3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the
merchandise is dispositive.
Period of Review
The POR is May 1, 2010, through
April 30, 2011.
Final Results of the Review
We determine that a weighted-average
dumping margin exists for JBL Canada
for the period May 1, 2010, through
April 30, 2011, as follows:
Manufacturer/exporter
Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc ............
Percent
margin
2.34
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to
19 CFR 356.8(a), the Department intends
to issue appropriate appraisement
instructions for the respondent subject
to this review directly to CBP 41 days
after the date of publication of the final
results of this review.
For those sales where JBL Canada
reported the entered value of its U.S.
sales, we calculated importer-specific
ad valorem duty assessment rates based
on the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales to the total entered
value of the examined sales to that
importer. For those sales where the
respondent did not know the entered
value or importer of its U.S. sales, we
calculated customer-specific per-unit
duty assessment rates by aggregating the
total amount of antidumping duties
calculated for the examined sales and
dividing this amount by the total
quantity of those sales. To determine
whether the per-unit duty assessment
rates are de minimis, in accordance with
the requirement set forth in 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), we calculated customerspecific ad valorem ratios based on the
estimated entered value.
We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review if any
importer-specific assessment rate
calculated in the final results of this
review is above de minimis (i.e., at or
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
24462
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
above 0.50 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate without regard to antidumping
duties any entries for which the
assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less
than 0.50 percent). The final results of
this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise covered by the
final results of this review and for future
deposits of estimated duties, where
applicable.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment
Policy Notice). This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by the
company included in these final results
of review for which the reviewed
company did not know that the
merchandise it sold to the intermediary
(e.g., a reseller, trading company, or
exporter) was destined for the United
States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate effective
during the POR if there is no rate for the
intermediary involved in the
transaction. See Assessment Policy
Notice for a full discussion of this
clarification.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for the company
listed above will be that established in
the final results of this review, except if
the rate is less than 0.50 percent and,
therefore, de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in
which case the cash deposit rate will be
zero; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not
participating in this review, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a
previous review, or the original lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 23.21
percent, the all-others rate made
effective by the LTFV investigation. See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:40 Apr 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
from Canada and the People’s Republic
of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74
FR 25703 (May 29, 2009). These deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice
are published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.221.
Dated: April 17, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–9826 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–909]
Certain Steel Nails From the People’s
Republic of China: Amended Final
Results of the Second Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 24, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ricardo Martinez Rivera, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4532.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 1, 2012, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published
the final results of the second
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
nails (‘‘steel nails’’) from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 On March
5, 2012, certain mandatory and separate
rate respondents, as well as Itochu
Building Products Co., Inc. (‘‘IBP’’),2
and Stanley 3 filed timely allegations
that the Department made ministerial
errors in the Final Results and
requested, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224,
that the Department correct the alleged
ministerial errors. On March 12, 2012,
Petitioner 4 submitted comments
rebutting the errors alleged by IBP et al.
and Stanley. No other party in this
proceeding submitted comments on the
Department’s final margin calculations.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
includes certain steel nails having a
shaft length up to 12 inches. Certain
steel nails include, but are not limited
to, nails made of round wire and nails
that are cut. Certain steel nails may be
of one piece construction or constructed
of two or more pieces. Certain steel nails
may be produced from any type of steel,
and have a variety of finishes, heads,
shanks, point types, shaft lengths and
shaft diameters. Finishes include, but
are not limited to, coating in vinyl, zinc
(galvanized, whether by electroplating
or hot dipping one or more times),
1 See Certain Steel Nails from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results and Final
Rescission of the Second Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 77 FR 12556 (March 1,
2012) and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum (‘‘Final Results’’).
2 Certified Products International Inc., Chiieh
Yungs Metal Ind. Corp., Huanghua Jinhai Hardware
Products Co., Ltd., Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli
Industry & Business Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hongli’’), Tianjin
Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jinchi’’),
Shangdong Dinglong Import & Export Co., Ltd.,
Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd., Hengshui
Mingyao Hardware & Mesh Products Co., Ltd.,
Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products, Shanghai
Jade Shuttle Hardware Tools Co., Ltd., Shanghai
Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd., Shanxi Tianli
Industries Co., Ltd., China Staple Enterprise
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Qidong Liang Chyuan Metal
Industry Co., Ltd., Romp (Tianjin) Hardware Co.,
Ltd., CYM (Nanjing) Ningquan Nail Manufacture
Co., Ltd. a.k.a. CYM (Nanjing), Nail Manufacture
Co., Ltd., Shanxi Pioneer Hardware Industrial Co.,
Ltd., and Mingguang Abundant Hardware
Productions Co., Ltd. (collectively ‘‘IBP et al.’’).
3 The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening
Systems Co., Ltd. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc./
Stanley Fastening Systems, LP (collectively
‘‘Stanley’’).
4 Mid Continent Nail Corporation.
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24461-24462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9826]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-122-853]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 7, 2012, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate
salts from Canada. The review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the
subject merchandise: Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL Canada). The period
of review (POR) is May 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011.
No interested party submitted comments on the preliminary results.
We have made no changes to the margin calculation for the final results
of this review. Therefore, the final results do not differ from the
preliminary results. The final weighted-average dumping margin for JBL
Canada is listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of
this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4007
or (202) 482-4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject
merchandise: JBL Canada.
On February 7, 2012, the Department published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts from
Canada. See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR
6061 (February 7, 2012) (Preliminary Results).
We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results of the
review. No interested party submitted comments. The Department has
conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order includes all grades and granulation sizes
of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate in their
unblended forms, whether dry or in solution, and regardless of
packaging type. The scope also includes blends of citric acid, sodium
citrate, and potassium citrate; as well as blends with other
ingredients, such as sugar, where the unblended form(s) of citric acid,
sodium citrate, and potassium citrate constitute 40 percent or more, by
weight, of the blend. The scope of this order also includes all forms
of crude calcium citrate, including dicalcium citrate monohydrate, and
tricalcium citrate tetrahydrate, which are intermediate products in the
production of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate. The
scope of this order does not include calcium citrate that satisfies the
standards set forth in the United States Pharmacopeia and has been
mixed with a functional excipient, such as dextrose or starch, where
the excipient constitutes at least 2 percent, by weight, of the
product. The scope of this order includes the hydrous and anhydrous
forms of citric acid, the dihydrate and anhydrous forms of sodium
citrate, otherwise known as citric acid sodium salt, and the
monohydrate and monopotassium forms of potassium citrate. Sodium
citrate also includes both trisodium citrate and monosodium citrate,
which are also known as citric acid trisodium salt and citric acid
monosodium salt, respectively. Citric acid and sodium citrate are
classifiable under 2918.14.0000 and 2918.15.1000 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), respectively. Potassium
citrate and crude calcium citrate are classifiable under 2918.15.5000
and 3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS, respectively. Blends that include citric
acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate are classifiable under
3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
merchandise is dispositive.
Period of Review
The POR is May 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011.
Final Results of the Review
We determine that a weighted-average dumping margin exists for JBL
Canada for the period May 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011, as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent
Manufacturer/exporter margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc...................................... 2.34
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to 19 CFR
356.8(a), the Department intends to issue appropriate appraisement
instructions for the respondent subject to this review directly to CBP
41 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review.
For those sales where JBL Canada reported the entered value of its
U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment
rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties
calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the
examined sales to that importer. For those sales where the respondent
did not know the entered value or importer of its U.S. sales, we
calculated customer-specific per-unit duty assessment rates by
aggregating the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales and dividing this amount by the total quantity of those
sales. To determine whether the per-unit duty assessment rates are de
minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), we calculated customer-specific ad valorem ratios based
on the estimated entered value.
We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review if any importer-specific
assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above
de minimis (i.e., at or
[[Page 24462]]
above 0.50 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct
CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for
which the assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent).
The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment
of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final
results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties,
where applicable.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment
Policy Notice). This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by the company included in these
final results of review for which the reviewed company did not know
that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller,
trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In
such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at
the all-others rate effective during the POR if there is no rate for
the intermediary involved in the transaction. See Assessment Policy
Notice for a full discussion of this clarification.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company
listed above will be that established in the final results of this
review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the
cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published
for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a previous review, or the original less-than-fair-value
(LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most recent period for the
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 23.21 percent, the
all-others rate made effective by the LTFV investigation. See Citric
Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada and the People's Republic of
China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 (May 29, 2009). These
deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice are published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221.
Dated: April 17, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-9826 Filed 4-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P