Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final No Shipment Determination, 24459-24461 [2012-9819]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices 24459 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose by April 30, 2015. Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2012. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman ForeignTrade Zones Board. International Trade Administration [Order No. 1824] Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 226 Under Alternative Site Framework Merced County, CA mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR 1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose zones; Whereas, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Merced, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 226, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 84–2011, filed 12/23/2011) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with a service area which includes portions of Fresno, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Stanislaus and Tulare Counties, California as its service area, as described in the application, within and adjacent to the Fresno U.S. Customs and Border Protection port of entry, and FTZ 226’s existing Sites 1, 2, 9, 10 and 11 would be categorized as magnet sites, existing Site 8 would be categorized as a usage-driven site, Sites 3, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13 would be deleted and acreage reduced at existing Site 1; Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (76 FR 81912–81913, 12/29/ 2011) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board’s regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest; Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders: The application to reorganize FTZ 226 under the alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, and to five-year ASF sunset provisions for magnet sites that would terminate authority for Sites 2, 9 10 and 11 if not activated by April 30, 2017, and to a three-year sunset provision for usagedriven sites that would terminate authority for Site 8 if no foreign-status VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:40 Apr 23, 2012 Jkt 226001 ATTEST: Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [Order No. 1821] Voluntary Termination of ForeignTrade Subzone 9D, Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd., Kahului, Maui, HI Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the Foreign-Trade Zones Board Regulations (15 CFR part 400), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) hereby adopts the following order: Whereas, on April 25, 1986, the Board issued a grant of authority to the State of Hawaii (grantee of FTZ 9) authorizing the establishment of Foreign-Trade Subzone 9D at the Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd., facility in Kahului, Maui, Hawaii (Board Order 329, 51 FR 16367, 05/02/1986); Whereas, the State of Hawaii has advised that zone procedures are no longer needed at the facility and requested voluntary termination of Subzone 9D (FTZ Docket 14–2012); and, Whereas, the request has been reviewed by the FTZ Staff and U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials, and approval has been recommended; Now, therefore, the Foreign-Trade Zones Board terminates the subzone status of Subzone 9D, effective this date. Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2012. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. Attest: Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–9824 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final No Shipment Determination Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 22, 2011, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings (SSBW pipe fittings) from Italy.1 This review covers two respondent companies and the period of review is from February 1, 2010, through January 31, 2011. We invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary results but received no comments. Therefore, our final results remain unchanged from the preliminary results of review. DATES: Effective Date: April 24, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edythe Artman or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3931 or (202) 482– 3019, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: [FR Doc. 2012–9821 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am] PO 00000 [A–475–828] Sfmt 4703 Background On December 22, 2011, the Department published the preliminary results of the current administrative review on SSBW pipe fittings from Italy in the Federal Register. See Preliminary Results. In these results, we preliminarily determined that the respondent Filmag Italia SRL (Filmag) had no reviewable transactions during the period of review. With respect to the respondent Tectubi Raccordi S.p.A. (Tectubi), we determined that it and two of its affiliates, Raccordi Forgiati S.r.l. (Raccordi) and Allied International S.r.l. (Allied) should be treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating a dumping margin pursuant to the provisions of 19 CFR 351.401(f) and consequently, we calculated a preliminary dumping margin based on the sales information reported by Tectubi for all three companies. 1 See Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary No Shipment Determination, 76 FR 79651 (December 22, 2011) (Preliminary Results). E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM 24APN1 24460 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results of review but received no comments and did not receive any requests for a hearing. Period of Review The period of review is February 1, 2010, through January 31, 2011. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Order For purposes of the order, the product covered is certain stainless steel, buttweld pipe fittings. SSBW pipe fittings are under 14 inches in outside diameter (based on nominal pipe size), whether finished or unfinished. The product encompasses all grades of stainless steel and ‘‘commodity’’ and ‘‘specialty’’ fittings. Specifically excluded from the definition are threaded, grooved, and bolted fittings, and fittings made from any material other than stainless steel. The butt-weld fittings subject to the order are generally designated under specification ASTM A403/A403M, the standard specification for Wrought Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping Fittings, or its foreign equivalents (e.g., DIN or JIS specifications). This specification covers two general classes of fittings, WP and CR, of wrought austenitic stainless steel fittings of seamless and welded construction covered by the latest revision of ANSI B16.9, ANSI B16.11, and ANSI B16.28. Butt-weld fittings manufactured to specification ASTM A774, or its foreign equivalents, are also covered by the order. The order does not apply to cast fittings. Cast austenitic stainless steel pipe fittings are covered by specifications A351/A351M, A743/ 743M, and A744/A744M. The butt-weld fittings subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheading 7307.23.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Final Determination of No Shipments As noted in the Preliminary Results, Filmag stated that it had no sales of subject merchandise during the period of review in response to our antidumping questionnaire and we were able to confirm with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that the company had no entries of subject merchandise during this period. Based on this evidence, we preliminarily determined that Filmag had no reviewable transactions during the period of review. We further found that if, in the final results, we continued to VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:40 Apr 23, 2012 Jkt 226001 find that Filmag had no reviewable transactions of subject merchandise, we would instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Filmag but exported by other parties at the all-others rate.2 Because we have no basis to find otherwise, we continue to find that Filmag had no reviewable transactions of subject merchandise during the period of review for the final results of review. Furthermore, we continue to find that it is more consistent with our May 6, 2003, ‘‘automatic assessment’’ clarification 3 not to rescind the review in part in these circumstances but, rather, to complete the review with respect to Filmag and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on our final results. See the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section of this notice below. and Filmag for which they did not know that their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate of 26.59 percent, established in the lessthan-fair-value investigation of the order,5 if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of these final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or Final Results of Review after the publication date of these final results, consistent with section We determine that the following 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject weighted-average dumping margins merchandise manufactured and exist for the period February 1, 2010, exported by the collapsed Tectubi through January 31, 2011: companies (i.e., Tectubi, Raccordi and Allied), the cash deposit rate will be Weighted average zero; (2) for previously reviewed or Manufacturer/exporter margins investigated companies other than the (percent) collapsed Tectubi companies, the cashdeposit rate will continue to be the Tectubi Raccordi S.p.A./ company-specific rate published for the Raccordi Forgiati S.r.l./Allied International S.r.l. ................ 0.00 most-recent period; (3) if the exporter is Filmag Italia SRL .................... * not a firm covered in this review, the prior review, or the investigation but the * No shipments or sales subject to this review. The firm does not have an individual manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate will be the rate established for the most rate from a prior segment of the proceeding. recent period for the manufacturer of Assessment Rates the merchandise; and (4) if neither the We will instruct CBP to apply a exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm dumping margin of zero percent to all covered in this or any previous review entries of subject merchandise during conducted by the Department, the cashthe period of review that were produced deposit rate will be the all-others rate of by Tectubi or Raccordi and exported 26.59 percent. These deposit and imported by Tectubi.4 requirements, when imposed, shall The Department clarified its remain in effect until further notice. ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on Notifications to Interested Parties May 6, 2003. See Assessment of This notice also serves as a final Antidumping Duties. This clarification reminder to importers of their will apply to entries of subject responsibility under 19 CFR merchandise during the period of 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate review produced by Tectubi, Raccordi regarding the reimbursement of 2 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian antidumping duties prior to liquidation Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping of the relevant entries during this Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922 (May 13, review period. Failure to comply with 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the this requirement could result in the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Secretary’s presumption that Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 reimbursement of antidumping duties (September 17, 2010). 3 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty occurred and the subsequent assessment Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 of doubled antidumping duties. FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment of This notice also serves as a reminder Antidumping Duties). to parties subject to administrative 4 Although we found it appropriate to collapse the sales information reported by Tectubi, Raccordi and Allied for our margin analysis, all subject merchandise under review was produced by Tectubi or Raccordi, exported by Tectubi and imported by Tectubi. PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5 See Antidumping Duty Orders: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Italy, Malaysia, and the Philippines, 66 FR 11257, 11258 (February, 23, 2001). E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM 24APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation, which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Dated: April 17, 2012. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2012–9819 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–122–853] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On February 7, 2012, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts from Canada. The review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject merchandise: Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL Canada). The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011. No interested party submitted comments on the preliminary results. We have made no changes to the margin calculation for the final results of this review. Therefore, the final results do not differ from the preliminary results. The final weighted-average dumping margin for JBL Canada is listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:40 Apr 23, 2012 Jkt 226001 telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482– 4929, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The review covers one manufacturer/ exporter of the subject merchandise: JBL Canada. On February 7, 2012, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts from Canada. See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 6061 (February 7, 2012) (Preliminary Results). We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results of the review. No interested party submitted comments. The Department has conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The scope of this order includes all grades and granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate in their unblended forms, whether dry or in solution, and regardless of packaging type. The scope also includes blends of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate; as well as blends with other ingredients, such as sugar, where the unblended form(s) of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate constitute 40 percent or more, by weight, of the blend. The scope of this order also includes all forms of crude calcium citrate, including dicalcium citrate monohydrate, and tricalcium citrate tetrahydrate, which are intermediate products in the production of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate. The scope of this order does not include calcium citrate that satisfies the standards set forth in the United States Pharmacopeia and has been mixed with a functional excipient, such as dextrose or starch, where the excipient constitutes at least 2 percent, by weight, of the product. The scope of this order includes the hydrous and anhydrous forms of citric acid, the dihydrate and anhydrous forms of sodium citrate, otherwise known as citric acid sodium salt, and the monohydrate and monopotassium forms of potassium citrate. Sodium citrate also includes both trisodium citrate and monosodium citrate, which are also known as citric acid trisodium salt and citric acid monosodium salt, respectively. Citric acid and sodium citrate are classifiable under 2918.14.0000 and 2918.15.1000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 24461 United States (HTSUS), respectively. Potassium citrate and crude calcium citrate are classifiable under 2918.15.5000 and 3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS, respectively. Blends that include citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate are classifiable under 3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive. Period of Review The POR is May 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011. Final Results of the Review We determine that a weighted-average dumping margin exists for JBL Canada for the period May 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011, as follows: Manufacturer/exporter Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc ............ Percent margin 2.34 Assessment Rates The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to 19 CFR 356.8(a), the Department intends to issue appropriate appraisement instructions for the respondent subject to this review directly to CBP 41 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For those sales where JBL Canada reported the entered value of its U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales to that importer. For those sales where the respondent did not know the entered value or importer of its U.S. sales, we calculated customer-specific per-unit duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales and dividing this amount by the total quantity of those sales. To determine whether the per-unit duty assessment rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), we calculated customerspecific ad valorem ratios based on the estimated entered value. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., at or E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM 24APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24459-24461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-475-828]


Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Italy: Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final No Shipment 
Determination

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On December 22, 2011, the Department of Commerce published the 
preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping 
duty order on stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings (SSBW pipe 
fittings) from Italy.\1\ This review covers two respondent companies 
and the period of review is from February 1, 2010, through January 31, 
2011. We invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary 
results but received no comments. Therefore, our final results remain 
unchanged from the preliminary results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Italy: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Preliminary No Shipment Determination, 76 FR 79651 (December 22, 
2011) (Preliminary Results).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: April 24, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edythe Artman or Angelica Mendoza, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3931 or (202) 482-3019, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 22, 2011, the Department published the preliminary 
results of the current administrative review on SSBW pipe fittings from 
Italy in the Federal Register. See Preliminary Results. In these 
results, we preliminarily determined that the respondent Filmag Italia 
SRL (Filmag) had no reviewable transactions during the period of 
review. With respect to the respondent Tectubi Raccordi S.p.A. 
(Tectubi), we determined that it and two of its affiliates, Raccordi 
Forgiati S.r.l. (Raccordi) and Allied International S.r.l. (Allied) 
should be treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating a 
dumping margin pursuant to the provisions of 19 CFR 351.401(f) and 
consequently, we calculated a preliminary dumping margin based on the 
sales information reported by Tectubi for all three companies.

[[Page 24460]]

    We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results of review 
but received no comments and did not receive any requests for a 
hearing.

Period of Review

    The period of review is February 1, 2010, through January 31, 2011.

Scope of the Order

    For purposes of the order, the product covered is certain stainless 
steel, butt-weld pipe fittings. SSBW pipe fittings are under 14 inches 
in outside diameter (based on nominal pipe size), whether finished or 
unfinished. The product encompasses all grades of stainless steel and 
``commodity'' and ``specialty'' fittings. Specifically excluded from 
the definition are threaded, grooved, and bolted fittings, and fittings 
made from any material other than stainless steel.
    The butt-weld fittings subject to the order are generally 
designated under specification ASTM A403/A403M, the standard 
specification for Wrought Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping Fittings, 
or its foreign equivalents (e.g., DIN or JIS specifications). This 
specification covers two general classes of fittings, WP and CR, of 
wrought austenitic stainless steel fittings of seamless and welded 
construction covered by the latest revision of ANSI B16.9, ANSI B16.11, 
and ANSI B16.28. Butt-weld fittings manufactured to specification ASTM 
A774, or its foreign equivalents, are also covered by the order.
    The order does not apply to cast fittings. Cast austenitic 
stainless steel pipe fittings are covered by specifications A351/A351M, 
A743/743M, and A744/A744M.
    The butt-weld fittings subject to the order is currently 
classifiable under subheading 7307.23.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description 
of the scope of the order is dispositive.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    As noted in the Preliminary Results, Filmag stated that it had no 
sales of subject merchandise during the period of review in response to 
our antidumping questionnaire and we were able to confirm with U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that the company had no entries of 
subject merchandise during this period. Based on this evidence, we 
preliminarily determined that Filmag had no reviewable transactions 
during the period of review. We further found that if, in the final 
results, we continued to find that Filmag had no reviewable 
transactions of subject merchandise, we would instruct CBP to liquidate 
any existing entries of merchandise produced by Filmag but exported by 
other parties at the all-others rate.\2\ Because we have no basis to 
find otherwise, we continue to find that Filmag had no reviewable 
transactions of subject merchandise during the period of review for the 
final results of review. Furthermore, we continue to find that it is 
more consistent with our May 6, 2003, ``automatic assessment'' 
clarification \3\ not to rescind the review in part in these 
circumstances but, rather, to complete the review with respect to 
Filmag and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on our final 
results. See the ``Assessment Rates'' section of this notice below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
26922 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the Russian 
Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
    \3\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(Assessment of Antidumping Duties).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins 
exist for the period February 1, 2010, through January 31, 2011:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted
                                                               average
                   Manufacturer/exporter                       margins
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tectubi Raccordi S.p.A./Raccordi Forgiati S.r.l./Allied             0.00
 International S.r.l......................................
Filmag Italia SRL.........................................            *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No shipments or sales subject to this review. The firm does not have
  an individual rate from a prior segment of the proceeding.

Assessment Rates

    We will instruct CBP to apply a dumping margin of zero percent to 
all entries of subject merchandise during the period of review that 
were produced by Tectubi or Raccordi and exported and imported by 
Tectubi.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Although we found it appropriate to collapse the sales 
information reported by Tectubi, Raccordi and Allied for our margin 
analysis, all subject merchandise under review was produced by 
Tectubi or Raccordi, exported by Tectubi and imported by Tectubi.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003. See Assessment of Antidumping Duties. This clarification 
will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the period of 
review produced by Tectubi, Raccordi and Filmag for which they did not 
know that their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such 
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate of 26.59 percent, established in the less-than-fair-
value investigation of the order,\5\ if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Antidumping Duty Orders: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe 
Fittings From Italy, Malaysia, and the Philippines, 66 FR 11257, 
11258 (February, 23, 2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after 
publication of these final results of review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these 
final results, consistent with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 
subject merchandise manufactured and exported by the collapsed Tectubi 
companies (i.e., Tectubi, Raccordi and Allied), the cash deposit rate 
will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies 
other than the collapsed Tectubi companies, the cash-deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most-recent 
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, the 
prior review, or the investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash-
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period 
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the 
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous 
review conducted by the Department, the cash-deposit rate will be the 
all-others rate of 26.59 percent. These deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notifications to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative

[[Page 24461]]

protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return 
or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern 
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. 
Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials 
or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation, 
which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

     Dated: April 17, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-9819 Filed 4-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P