Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: Uniform Criteria for State Observational Surveys of Seat Belt Use, 22844-22845 [2012-9197]

Download as PDF 22844 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 17, 2012 / Notices below will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected burden. A Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting public comments on the following information collection was published on September 20, 2011 (Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 182/pp. 58341–58342). DATES: Submit comments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on or before May 17, 2012. ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725—17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or by email at oira_submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax: 202–395–5806. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Traube at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of HumanVehicle Performance Research (NVS– 331), Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Traube’s phone number is 202–366–5673. His email address is eric.traube@dot.gov. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: National Survey of Driver Attitudes and Opinions of Advanced Invehicle Alcohol Detection Systems. OMB Control Number: 2127–0669. Type of Request: Revision. Abstract: In a continuing effort to reduce the adverse consequences of alcohol-impaired driving, NHTSA in conjunction with the Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety (ACTS) is undertaking research and development to explore the feasibility of, and public policy challenges associated with, use of in-vehicle alcohol detection technology. The agency believes that use of vehiclebased, alcohol detection technologies could help to significantly reduce the number of alcohol-impaired driving crashes, deaths and injuries by preventing drivers from driving while their blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is at or above the legal limit. In 2008, ACTS and NHTSA entered into a 5-Year Cooperative Agreement to ‘‘explore the feasibility, the potential benefits of, and the public policy challenges associated with a more widespread use of unobtrusive technology to prevent drunk driving.’’ The goal of the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) project is, through a step-bystep, data-driven process, to develop and test prototypes that may be VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:27 Apr 16, 2012 Jkt 226001 considered for vehicle integration thereafter. As technology development progresses and decisions are being made about best practices for integrating such technology into vehicles, NHTSA is soliciting public opinions about the proposed in-vehicle alcohol detection devices. Optimization of the effectiveness of the technology and public acceptance of it as a safety enhancement once deployed will depend on the extent to which public attitudes are taken into account during the development process. OMB previously approved focus groups with licensed drivers to provide an initial understanding of public preferences concerning advanced alcohol detection technology. In order to provide a more complete understanding of driver preferences, NHTSA is proposing to conduct a nationally representative telephone survey of drivers. Interviews would be completed with 1,000 licensed drivers randomly selected from the 50 States and the District of Columbia. The survey would be composed of both a landline sample and a smaller cell phone sample selected from separate sampling frames. The drivers would have the developing in-vehicle alcohol sensing technology systems described to them, and asked a series of questions to obtain their reactions to the systems and their possible installation in new vehicles. In conducting the telephone interviews, the interviewers would use computer-assisted telephone interviewing to reduce interview length and minimize recording errors. Each driver in the sample would be interviewed a single time. No information would be collected that could be used to identify any respondent. NHTSA and ACTS will use the information from the proposed telephone survey in decision making regarding integration of the technology under investigation into a vehicle. Affected Public: Randomly selected members of the general public ages 21 and older from across the United States will be surveyed by telephone. Participation by all respondents would be voluntary and anonymous. Estimated Total Annual Burden: 256 hours 15 minutes (1,000 interviews plus 25 pilot interviews each averaging 15 minutes) would be added to the 288 hours previously approved for the focus groups, which would total 544 hours and 15 minutes. Comments Are Invited on the Following (i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Department of Transportation, including whether the information will have practical utility; (ii) The accuracy of the Department’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (iii) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication of this notice. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A). Issued in Washington, DC, on April 17, 2012. John Maddox, Associate Administrator, Vehicle Safety Research. [FR Doc. 2012–9158 Filed 4–16–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [NHTSA–2010–0002] Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: Uniform Criteria for State Observational Surveys of Seat Belt Use National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, US DOT. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of the information collections and their expected burden. The notice of proposed rulemaking, which included a statement of the collection of information and a 60-day comment period, was published on January 28, 2009. SUMMARY: Comments must be submitted on or before May 17, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Oates at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Regional Operations and Program Delivery (NTI–200), 202–366–2730, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 17, 2012 / Notices Title: Uniform Criteria for State Observational Surveys of Seat Belt Use. OMB Control Number: 2127–0597. Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from the approval date. Type of Request: Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection. Affected Public: State Governments (the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and 4 territories). Form Number: N/A. Abstract: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU) (Pub. L. 109–59) provides that the Secretary of Transportation may not approve for Section 402 funding a State highway safety program which does not provide satisfactory assurances that the State will implement an annual statewide seat belt use survey in accordance with criteria established by the Secretary to ensure that the measurements of seat belt use are accurate and representative. In addition, in 2008, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) partnered to develop a voluntary minimum set of performance measures to be used by States and federal agencies in the development and implementation of behavioral highway safety plans and programs. Included in the set as the core behavior measure is B–1, observed seat belt use for passenger vehicles, front seat outboard occupants. Since the original adoption of seat belt observational survey Uniform Criteria in 1998, NHTSA and the States have accumulated substantial experience in the design and implementation of these surveys. This experience has provided insight into factors that could affect survey accuracy and reliability. In addition, technological improvements in road inventories have made it possible to select observation sites in a more cost effective manner. For these reasons, NHTSA proposed to revise the Uniform Criteria so that future surveys will give States more accurate data to guide their occupant protection programs. The States themselves use the information collected in their seat belt use surveys to evaluate the effectiveness of their occupant protection countermeasures programs and to identify relatively low seat belt use areas and sub-populations requiring increased program emphasis. NHTSA uses the collected information, pooled across the States, to determine the relative impact of various countermeasures and program strategies and to provide guidance to assist the VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:27 Apr 16, 2012 Jkt 226001 States in achieving the highest possible seat belt use. NHTSA also uses the collected information from individual States to identify those whose occupant protection programs would most benefit from special management reviews, countermeasure demonstration projects and other forms of technical assistance. The information collected for the States’ seat belt observational surveys is to include a specification of the survey design, to be reassessed and, if appropriate, updated every five (5) years, or earlier if the State so desires. The survey design specification will include a description of the methodology used to select the survey observation sites, the selection probability of each site, the survey observation procedures and protocols, observer training and quality control procedures. In addition, each State annually is to submit the survey results, including, for each observation site, the number of front seat outboard occupants that were observed, the number observed to be wearing the seat belt, and the site weighting factor used to combine the individual site data into the measure of statewide seat belt use. The notice of proposed rulemaking, which included a statement of the collection of information and a 60-day comment period, was published on January 28, 2009. See 75 FR 4509. In the preamble to the final rule published on April 1, 2011, the agency explained how the collection of information contained in the final rule responded to any comments received from the public. See 76 FR 18042. The agency also included an identification and explanation of any modifications made in the rule and why it certain comments were not adopted. Estimated Total Annual Burden: 19,040 hours. Estimated Number of Respondents: 56 (50 States, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands). ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. Attention NHTSA Desk Officer. Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22845 burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Mary D. Gunnels, Associate Administrator, Regional Operations and Program Delivery. [FR Doc. 2012–9197 Filed 4–16–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request April 10, 2012. The Department of the Treasury will submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13, on or after the date of publication of this notice. DATES: Comments should be received on or before May 17, 2012 to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other aspect of the information collection, including suggestion for reducing the burden, to (1) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for Treasury, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, or email at OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV and (2) Treasury PRA Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Suite 8140, Washington, DC 20220, or on-line at www.PRAComment.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 927–5331, email at PRA@treasury.gov, or the entire information collection request maybe found at www.reginfo.gov. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) OMB Number: 1545–2222. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection. Title: VITA/TCE Volunteer Program. Forms: 8653, 8654, 14024, 14310. Abstract: The Internal Revenue Service offers free assistance with tax return preparation and tax counseling using specially trained volunteers. The Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) and Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) programs assist seniors and individuals with low to moderate incomes, those with disabilities, and those for whom English is a second language. E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22844-22845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[NHTSA-2010-0002]


Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: Uniform 
Criteria for State Observational Surveys of Seat Belt Use

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, US DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR 
describes the nature of the information collections and their expected 
burden. The notice of proposed rulemaking, which included a statement 
of the collection of information and a 60-day comment period, was 
published on January 28, 2009.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 17, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Oates at the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Regional Operations and 
Program Delivery (NTI-200), 202-366-2730, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 22845]]

    Title: Uniform Criteria for State Observational Surveys of Seat 
Belt Use.
    OMB Control Number: 2127-0597.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from the 
approval date.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement with change of a previously approved 
collection.
    Affected Public: State Governments (the 50 States, the District of 
Columbia, Puerto Rico and 4 territories).
    Form Number: N/A.
    Abstract: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation 
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) (Pub. L. 109-59) provides 
that the Secretary of Transportation may not approve for Section 402 
funding a State highway safety program which does not provide 
satisfactory assurances that the State will implement an annual 
statewide seat belt use survey in accordance with criteria established 
by the Secretary to ensure that the measurements of seat belt use are 
accurate and representative. In addition, in 2008, the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Governors Highway Safety 
Association (GHSA) partnered to develop a voluntary minimum set of 
performance measures to be used by States and federal agencies in the 
development and implementation of behavioral highway safety plans and 
programs. Included in the set as the core behavior measure is B-1, 
observed seat belt use for passenger vehicles, front seat outboard 
occupants. Since the original adoption of seat belt observational 
survey Uniform Criteria in 1998, NHTSA and the States have accumulated 
substantial experience in the design and implementation of these 
surveys. This experience has provided insight into factors that could 
affect survey accuracy and reliability. In addition, technological 
improvements in road inventories have made it possible to select 
observation sites in a more cost effective manner. For these reasons, 
NHTSA proposed to revise the Uniform Criteria so that future surveys 
will give States more accurate data to guide their occupant protection 
programs.
    The States themselves use the information collected in their seat 
belt use surveys to evaluate the effectiveness of their occupant 
protection countermeasures programs and to identify relatively low seat 
belt use areas and sub-populations requiring increased program 
emphasis. NHTSA uses the collected information, pooled across the 
States, to determine the relative impact of various countermeasures and 
program strategies and to provide guidance to assist the States in 
achieving the highest possible seat belt use. NHTSA also uses the 
collected information from individual States to identify those whose 
occupant protection programs would most benefit from special management 
reviews, countermeasure demonstration projects and other forms of 
technical assistance.
    The information collected for the States' seat belt observational 
surveys is to include a specification of the survey design, to be 
reassessed and, if appropriate, updated every five (5) years, or 
earlier if the State so desires. The survey design specification will 
include a description of the methodology used to select the survey 
observation sites, the selection probability of each site, the survey 
observation procedures and protocols, observer training and quality 
control procedures. In addition, each State annually is to submit the 
survey results, including, for each observation site, the number of 
front seat outboard occupants that were observed, the number observed 
to be wearing the seat belt, and the site weighting factor used to 
combine the individual site data into the measure of statewide seat 
belt use.
    The notice of proposed rulemaking, which included a statement of 
the collection of information and a 60-day comment period, was 
published on January 28, 2009. See 75 FR 4509. In the preamble to the 
final rule published on April 1, 2011, the agency explained how the 
collection of information contained in the final rule responded to any 
comments received from the public. See 76 FR 18042. The agency also 
included an identification and explanation of any modifications made in 
the rule and why it certain comments were not adopted.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 19,040 hours.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 56 (50 States, District of 
Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana 
Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands).

ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information 
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

Mary D. Gunnels,
Associate Administrator, Regional Operations and Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. 2012-9197 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.