Lightweight Thermal Paper From Germany: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 22560-22561 [2012-9059]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
22560
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Notices
period is not practicable. The
Department requires more time to gather
and analyze surrogate country and value
information, review questionnaire
responses, and issue supplemental
questionnaires. Therefore, in accordance
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we
are extending the time period for issuing
the preliminary results of review by 120
days until September 29, 2012.4 The
final results continue to be due 120 days
after the publication of the preliminary
results.
This notice is published pursuant to
sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: April 9, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–9080 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–937]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 16, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Krisha Hill or Maisha Cryor, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4037 or (202) 482–
5831, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On June 28, 2011, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published the initiation of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on citric acid
and certain citrate salts (‘‘citric acid’’)
from the People’s Republic of China
4 September
29, 2012, is a Saturday. Department
practice dictates that where a deadline falls on a
weekend or federal holiday, the appropriate
deadline is the next business day. See Notice of
Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’
Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines
Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70
FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). Accordingly, the
Department will issue the preliminary results on
October 1, 2012.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:39 Apr 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
(‘‘PRC’’).1 On January 10, 2012, the
Department published the extension of
time limit for the preliminary results of
the administrative review.2 This review
covers the period May 1, 2010, through
April 30, 2011. The preliminary results
of review are currently due no later than
April 30, 2012.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of Review
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), the Department shall make a
preliminary determination in an
administrative review of an
antidumping duty order within 245
days after the last day of the anniversary
month of the date of publication of the
order. The Act further provides,
however, that the Department may
extend that 245-day period to 365 days
if it determines it is not practicable to
complete the review within the
foregoing time period.
The Department finds that it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
citric acid from the PRC within this time
limit. Specifically, additional time is
needed to evaluate relevant evidence
and parties’ comments regarding the
selection of appropriate surrogate values
with which to value the factors of
production. Therefore, in accordance
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the
Department is fully extending the time
period for completion of the preliminary
results of this review by an additional
30 days. The preliminary results will
now be due no later than May 30, 2012.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: April 9, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–9054 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
1 See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 37781, 37785
(June 28, 2011).
2 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From
the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Time
Limit for the Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR
1455 (January 10, 2012).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–428–840]
Lightweight Thermal Paper From
Germany: Notice of Partial Rescission
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 16, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Moore or George McMahon,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3692 or (202) 482–
1167, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On November 1, 2011, the Department
of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register a
notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on lightweight
thermal paper (thermal paper) from
Germany for the period of review (POR)
November 1, 2010, through October 31,
2011.1
On November 30, 2011, the
Department received a timely request
filed on behalf of Appleton Papers Inc.
(petitioner) to conduct an administrative
review of Mitsubishi HiTec Paper
Flensburg GmbH, Mitsubishi HiTec
Paper Bielefeld GmbH, and Mitsubishi
International Corp. (collectively,
Mitsubishi), and Papierfabrik August
Koehler AG and Koehler America, Inc.
(Koehler). On November 30, 2011, the
Department also received a request filed
on behalf of Mitsubishi HiTec Paper
Europe GmbH to conduct an
administrative review of Mitsubishi
HiTec Paper Europe GmbH 2 and a
request filed on behalf of Koehler to
conduct an administrative review of
Koehler.
Pursuant to the aforementioned
requests, the Department published in
the Federal Register a notice of
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 76 FR 67413
(November 1, 2011).
2 Mitsubishi stated in its review request letter,
dated November 30, 2011, ‘‘{a}s of October 15,
2010, and for purposes of streamlining in-house
processes and organizational structure, Mitsubishi
HiTec Paper Flensburg GmbH, and Mitsubishi
HiTec Paper Bielefeld GmbH have merged and now
operate as Mitsubishi HiTec Paper Europe GmbH.’’
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Notices
initiation of an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on thermal
paper from Germany, covering two
respondents, Mitsubishi and Koehler.3
Partial Rescission of the 2010–2011
Administrative Review
On March 29, 2011, petitioner and
Mitsubishi withdrew their respective
requests for review of Mitsubishi.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if the parties
that requested a review withdraw the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. The instant
review was initiated on December 30,
2011. See Notice of Initiation. The
petitioner and Mitsubishi’s withdrawals
of their respective requests for a review
of Mitsubishi fall within the 90-day
deadline for rescission by the
Department, and no other party
requested an administrative review of
this particular respondent. Therefore, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
and consistent with our practice, we are
rescinding this review with respect to
Mitsubishi.4 The instant review will
continue with respect to Koehler.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
This notice serves as a final reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under an APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 82268
(December 30, 2011) (Notice of Initiation).
4 See, e.g., Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Extension of Time
Limit for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 21781 (May 11,
2009).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:39 Apr 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We have been enjoined from
liquidating entries of the subject
merchandise produced and/or exported
by Mitsubishi. Therefore, we do not
intend to issue liquidation instructions
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) for such entries entered on or
after November 1, 2009, until such time
as the preliminary injunction issued on
March 17, 2009, is lifted.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: April 5, 2012.
Edward C. Yang,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–9059 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–984]
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
People’s Republic of China: Correction
to Notice of Initiation of Countervailing
Duty Investigation
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 16, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Subler and Hermes Pinilla, AD/
CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0189 and (202)
482–3477, respectively.
SUMMARY: On March 27, 2012, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published the notice
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the
People’s Republic of China: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation, 77 FR
18211 (March 27, 2012) (‘‘Initiation
Notice’’). In the ‘‘Scope of Investigation’’
section of the Initiation Notice, the
Department omitted a word and used an
incomplete Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
1, 2012, the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) received a
countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) petition
concerning imports of drawn stainless
steel sinks from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) filed in proper form by
Elkay Manufacturing Company. See
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22561
Petition for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties
Against Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks
from the People’s Republic of China,
dated March 1, 2012. On March 27,
2012, the Department published the
Initiation Notice for the investigation.
The first paragraph of the ‘‘Scope of
Investigation’’ section of the Initiation
Notice stated the following: ‘‘Stainless
steel sinks with multiple bowls that are
joined through a welding operation to
form one unit are covered by the scope
of the investigation.’’ See Initiation
Notice, 77 FR at 18212. The Department
inadvertently omitted the word
‘‘drawn’’ from this sentence, as follows:
‘‘Stainless steel sinks with multiple
drawn bowls that are joined through a
welding operation to form one unit are
covered by the scope of the
investigation.’’
Furthermore, the last sentence of the
‘‘Scope of Investigation’’ section stated
the following: ‘‘The products covered by
the investigation are currently classified
in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under
statistical reporting number
7324.10.000.’’ The Department
inadvertently omitted a zero from the
end of this HTSUS number. The correct
HTSUS number is 7324.10.0000.
Correction
The ‘‘Scope of Investigation’’ section
below incorporates these two
corrections and represents the correct
scope of the investigation.1
Scope of Investigation
The products covered by the scope of
this investigation are stainless steel
sinks with single or multiple drawn
bowls, with or without drain boards,
whether finished or unfinished,
regardless of type of finish, gauge, or
grade of stainless steel (‘‘Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks’’). Mounting clips,
fasteners, seals, and sound-deadening
pads are also covered by the scope of
this investigation if they are included
within the sales price of the Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks.2 For purposes of
this scope definition, the term ‘‘drawn’’
refers to a manufacturing process using
metal forming technology to produce a
smooth basin with seamless, smooth,
1 The Department’s initiation checklist for the
investigation contained the correct scope. See
Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation
Checklist, Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the
People’s Republic of China (March 21, 2012), at
Attachment I.
2 Mounting clips, fasteners, seals, and sounddeadening pads are not covered by the scope of this
investigation if they are not included within the
sales price of the Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks,
regardless of whether they are shipped with or
entered with Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 73 (Monday, April 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22560-22561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9059]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-428-840]
Lightweight Thermal Paper From Germany: Notice of Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 16, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Moore or George McMahon, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3692 or (202) 482-1167, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register a notice of ``Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review'' of the antidumping duty order on lightweight
thermal paper (thermal paper) from Germany for the period of review
(POR) November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative
Review, 76 FR 67413 (November 1, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 30, 2011, the Department received a timely request
filed on behalf of Appleton Papers Inc. (petitioner) to conduct an
administrative review of Mitsubishi HiTec Paper Flensburg GmbH,
Mitsubishi HiTec Paper Bielefeld GmbH, and Mitsubishi International
Corp. (collectively, Mitsubishi), and Papierfabrik August Koehler AG
and Koehler America, Inc. (Koehler). On November 30, 2011, the
Department also received a request filed on behalf of Mitsubishi HiTec
Paper Europe GmbH to conduct an administrative review of Mitsubishi
HiTec Paper Europe GmbH \2\ and a request filed on behalf of Koehler to
conduct an administrative review of Koehler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Mitsubishi stated in its review request letter, dated
November 30, 2011, ``{a{time} s of October 15, 2010, and for
purposes of streamlining in-house processes and organizational
structure, Mitsubishi HiTec Paper Flensburg GmbH, and Mitsubishi
HiTec Paper Bielefeld GmbH have merged and now operate as Mitsubishi
HiTec Paper Europe GmbH.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the aforementioned requests, the Department published
in the Federal Register a notice of
[[Page 22561]]
initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
thermal paper from Germany, covering two respondents, Mitsubishi and
Koehler.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 76 FR
82268 (December 30, 2011) (Notice of Initiation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial Rescission of the 2010-2011 Administrative Review
On March 29, 2011, petitioner and Mitsubishi withdrew their
respective requests for review of Mitsubishi. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in
whole or in part, if the parties that requested a review withdraw the
request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The instant review was initiated on
December 30, 2011. See Notice of Initiation. The petitioner and
Mitsubishi's withdrawals of their respective requests for a review of
Mitsubishi fall within the 90-day deadline for rescission by the
Department, and no other party requested an administrative review of
this particular respondent. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), and consistent with our practice, we are rescinding this
review with respect to Mitsubishi.\4\ The instant review will continue
with respect to Koehler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See, e.g., Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Notice
of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 21781 (May 11, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
an APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We have been enjoined from liquidating entries of the subject
merchandise produced and/or exported by Mitsubishi. Therefore, we do
not intend to issue liquidation instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) for such entries entered on or after November 1, 2009,
until such time as the preliminary injunction issued on March 17, 2009,
is lifted.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: April 5, 2012.
Edward C. Yang,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-9059 Filed 4-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
