Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 21961-21963 [2012-8863]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
21961
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 71
Thursday, April 12, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
April 9, 2012.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques and other forms of
information technology should be
addressed to: Desk Officer for
Agriculture, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB),
Washington, DC,
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or
fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–
7602. Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received
within 30 days of this notification.
Copies of the submission(s) may be
obtained by calling (202) 720–8681.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Apr 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Forest Service
Title: Understanding Value Trade-Offs
Regarding Fire Hazard Reduction
Programs in the Wildland-Urban
Interface.
OMB Control Number: 0596–0189.
Summary of Collection: The Healthy
Forests Restoration Act (Pub. L. 108–
148), improves the ability of the
Secretary of Agriculture and the
Secretary of the Interior to plan and
conduct hazardous fuels reduction
projects on National Forest System and
Bureau of Land Management Lands. The
Forest Service, Bureau of Land
Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife
Service, and many State agencies with
fire protection responsibilities have
undertaken a very ambitious and
expensive forest fuels reduction
program. The Forest Service (FS) and
university researchers will contact
recipients of a phone/mail questionnaire
to help forest and fire managers
understand value trade-offs regarding
fire hazard reduction programs in the
wildland-urban interface.
Need and Use of the Information:
Through the questionnaire, researchers
will evaluate the responses of California
and Colorado residents to different
scenarios related to fire hazard
reduction programs, how residents
think the programs presented to them
are effective, and calculate how much
residents would be willing to pay to
implement the alternatives. The
collected information will help
researchers provide better information
to natural resources, forest, and fire
managers when they are contemplating
the kind and type of fire hazard
reduction programs to implement to
achieve forest land management
planning objectives. Without the
information the agencies with fire
protection responsibilities will lack the
capability to evaluate the general
public’s understanding of proposed
fuels reduction projects and programs or
their willingness to pay for
implementing such programs.
Description of Respondents:
Individuals or households.
Number of Respondents: 1,000.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Other (One time only).
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total Burden Hours: 584.
Charlene Parker,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–8814 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–928]
Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results and Final Rescission, in Part,
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 6, 2011, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published in the
Federal Register the Preliminary Results
of the second administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
uncovered innersprings units
(‘‘innersprings’’) from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We gave
interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the Preliminary Results.
None were received. As such, these final
results do not differ from the
Preliminary Results. We find that Reztec
Industries Sdn Bhd (‘‘Reztec’’) did not
sell subject merchandise during the
period of review (‘‘POR’’), February 1,
2010, through January 31, 2011 and,
thus we are rescinding the
administrative review, in part, with
respect to Reztec. We additionally find
that Goodnite Sdn Bhd (‘‘Goodnite’’)
failed to cooperate to the best of its
ability when it did not respond to the
Department’s original questionnaire
and, therefore, we have assigned
Goodnite’s a rate based on total adverse
facts available (‘‘AFA’’). The final
dumping margin for this administrative
review is listed in the ‘‘Final Results of
Review’’ section below.
DATES: Effective April 12, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Operations,
AGENCY:
1 See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and
Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 76126
(December 6, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
21962
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Notices
Office 9, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4031.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As noted above, on December 6, 2011,
the Department published in the
Federal Register the Preliminary Results
of the administrative review of
innersprings from the PRC. The
Department did not receive comments
from interested parties on the
Preliminary Results.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We have not made any changes to the
Preliminary Results.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is uncovered innerspring units
composed of a series of individual metal
springs joined together in sizes
corresponding to the sizes of adult
mattresses (e.g., twin, twin long, full,
full long, queen, California king and
king) and units used in smaller
constructions, such as crib and youth
mattresses. All uncovered innerspring
units are included in the scope
regardless of width and length. Included
within this definition are innersprings
typically ranging from 30.5 inches to 76
inches in width and 68 inches to 84
inches in length. Innersprings for crib
mattresses typically range from 25
inches to 27 inches in width and 50
inches to 52 inches in length.
Uncovered innerspring units are
suitable for use as the innerspring
component in the manufacture of
innerspring mattresses, including
mattresses that incorporate a foam
encasement around the innerspring.
Pocketed and non-pocketed
innerspring units are included in this
definition. Non-pocketed innersprings
are typically joined together with helical
wire and border rods. Non-pocketed
innersprings are included in this
definition regardless of whether they
have border rods attached to the
perimeter of the innerspring. Pocketed
innersprings are individual coils
covered by a ‘‘pocket’’ or ‘‘sock’’ of a
nonwoven synthetic material or woven
material and then glued together in a
linear fashion.
Uncovered innersprings are classified
under subheading 9404.29.9010 and
have also been classified under
subheadings 9404.10.0000,
7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, or
7320.90.5010 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Apr 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
(‘‘HTSUS’’). The HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes only; the written
description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Final Partial Rescission
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department preliminarily rescinded the
review with respect to Reztec.2 In this
administrative review, Reztec reported
that it had no shipments of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR. As a result, the Department
issued a no-shipment inquiry to U.S.
Customs Border and Protection (‘‘CBP’’),
asking that CBP provide any
information contrary to our preliminary
findings of no entries of subject
merchandise for merchandise
manufactured and shipped by Reztec.3
We did not receive any response from
CBP, thus indicating that there were no
entries of subject merchandise into the
United States exported by Reztec. After
issuing the Preliminary Results, the
Department did not receive any
comments from interested parties
regarding the rescission of this
company. Therefore, the Department is
rescinding the administrative review
with respect to Reztec.
Final Results of Review
The dumping margin for the POR is
as follows:
INNERSPRINGS FROM THE PRC
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin
(percent)
examined sales to the total entered
value of those same sales. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will
instruct CBP to liquidate, without regard
to antidumping duties, all entries of
subject merchandise during the POR for
which the importer-specific assessment
rate is zero or de minimis.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non-PRC exporters not listed above
that have separate rates, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (2) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC-wide rate of 234.51 percent;
(3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporters that supplied that non-PRC
exporter; and (4) for Goodnite the cash
deposit rate will be 234.51 percent.
These deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
.................................
234.51
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
Assessment
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
Upon issuance of the final results, the regarding the reimbursement of
Department will determine, and U.S.
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) of the relevant entries during this POR.
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
Failure to comply with this requirement
appropriate entries. The Department
could result in the Department’s
intends to issue assessment instructions presumption that reimbursement of
to CBP 15 days after the date of
antidumping duties has occurred and
publication of the final results of
the subsequent assessment of doubled
review. Pursuant to 19 CFR
antidumping duties.
351.212(b)(1), we will calculate
Administrative Protective Orders
importer-specific (or customer) ad
valorem duty assessment rates based on
In accordance with 19 CFR
the ratio of the total amount of the
351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as
dumping margins calculated for the
a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
2 See id., at 76127.
of their responsibility concerning the
3 See Memoranda to Michael Walsh, Director,
return or destruction of proprietary
AD/CVD/Revenue Policy & Programs, from Jim
information disclosed under the APO,
Doyle, Office Director, dated between October 28,
which continues to govern business
2010, to December 17, 2010, Request for U.S. Entry
Documents: Certain Steel Nails from the People’s
proprietary information in this segment
Republic of China.
of the proceeding. Timely written
4 The Department notes that this antidumping
notification of the return/destruction of
duty margin applies only to Goodnite’s subject
APO materials or conversion to judicial
merchandise, which is limited to PRC-origin
merchandise. See Preliminary Results at 76127.
protective order is hereby requested.
Goodnite 4
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Notices
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
administrative review and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: April 3, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–8863 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–423–808]
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From
Belgium: Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the ‘‘Department’’) has determined that
Aperam Stainless Belgium N.V.
(‘‘Aperam’’) is the successor-in-interest
to ArcelorMittal Stainless Belgium N.V.
(‘‘AMSB’’). As a result, Aperam will be
accorded the same treatment previously
accorded AMSB with regard to the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel plate in coils from Belgium (‘‘SSPC
from Belgium’’), effective as of the date
of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.
DATES: Effective April 12, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George McMahon or Stephanie Moore,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1167 and (202)
482–3692, respectively.
AGENCY:
Background
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
On May 21, 1999, the Department
published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel plate in coils from Belgium.1 On
1 See Antidumping Duty Orders; Certain Stainless
Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium, Canada, Italy,
the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan,
64 FR 27756 (May 21, 1999), amended by Notice of
Amended Antidumping Duty Orders; Certain
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium,
Canada, Italy, the Republic of Korea, South Africa,
and Taiwan, 68 FR 11520 (March 11, 2003); Notice
of Amended Antidumping Duty Orders; Certain
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium,
Canada, Italy, the Republic of Korea, South Africa,
and Taiwan, 68 FR 16117 (April 2, 2003); and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Apr 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
June 14, 2011, Aperam filed a request
for a changed circumstances review of
the antidumping duty order on SSPC
from Belgium. Aperam claimed that it is
the successor-in-interest to AMSB and
should be treated as such for purposes
of the antidumping duty order.
On July 29, 2011, the Department
published its initiation of the instant
changed circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on SSPC from
Belgium.2
On October 26, 2011, the Department
published its preliminary results of
changed circumstances review of the
AD Order on SSPC from Belgium.3 The
Department preliminarily determined
that Aperam is the successor-in-interest
to AMSB and should be treated as such
for purposes of the antidumping duty
order. In the Preliminary Results, we
stated that interested parties could
submit case briefs to the Department no
later than 30 days after the publication
of the Preliminary Results in the Federal
Register, and submit rebuttal briefs
seven days subsequent to the due date
of the case briefs. Aperam submitted a
case brief on November 23, 2011, and no
interested parties submitted a rebuttal
brief.
Analysis of Comments Received
The issue raised in Aperam’s case
brief is addressed in the ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of the Changed Circumstances
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from
Belgium,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, (‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum’’),4 dated
concurrently with this notice and which
is hereby adopted by this notice. A list
of the issues which parties have raised,
Notice of Correction to the Amended Antidumping
Duty Orders; Certain Stainless Steel Plate in Coils
From Belgium, Canada, Italy, the Republic of Korea,
South Africa, and Taiwan, 68 FR 20114 (April 24,
2003).
2 See Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium:
Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review, 76 FR 45511 (July 29, 2011).
3 See Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium:
Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review 76 FR 66271
(October 26, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
4 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file electronically via
Import Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available in
the Central Records Unit, main Commerce Building,
Room 7046. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The
signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and
electronic version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21963
and to which we have responded in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is
attached to this notice as an Appendix.
Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order
The product covered by this order is
certain stainless steel plate in coils.
Stainless steel is an alloy steel
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or
less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more
of chromium, with or without other
elements. The subject plate products are
flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in
width and 4.75 mm or more in
thickness, in coils, and annealed or
otherwise heat treated and pickled or
otherwise descaled. The subject plate
may also be further processed (e.g.,
cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that
it maintains the specified dimensions of
plate following such processing.
Excluded from the scope of this order
are the following: (1) Plate not in coils;
(2) Plate that is not annealed or
otherwise heat treated and pickled or
otherwise descaled; (3) Sheet and strip;
and (4) Flat bars.
The merchandise subject to this order
is currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at
subheadings: 7219.11.00.30,
7219.11.00.60, 7219.12.00.06,
7219.12.00.21, 7219.12.00.26,
7219.12.00.51, 7219.12.00.56,
7219.12.00.66, 7219.12.00.71,
7219.12.00.81, 7219.31.00.10,
7219.90.00.10, 7219.90.00.20,
7219.90.00.25, 7219.90.00.60,
7219.90.00.80, 7220.11.00.00,
7220.20.10.10, 7220.20.10.15,
7220.20.10.60, 7220.20.10.80,
7220.20.60.05, 7220.20.60.10,
7220.20.60.15, 7220.20.60.60,
7220.20.60.80, 7220.90.00.10,
7220.90.00.15, 7220.90.00.60, and
7220.90.00.80. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to these orders is dispositive.
Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Review
Based on the information provided by
Aperam, the Department’s analysis in
the Preliminary Results (which we
incorporate herein by reference), and in
light of the fact that no interested parties
submitted any comments on the
Department’s preliminary finding with
respect to Aperam, the Department
hereby determines that Aperam is the
successor-in-interest to AMSB and is
entitled to AMSB’s treatment under the
order. The Department will rely on the
date of the publication of these final
results of the instant changed
circumstances review in the Federal
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21961-21963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8863]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-928]
Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results and Final Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 6, 2011, the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') published in the Federal Register the Preliminary
Results of the second administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on uncovered innersprings units (``innersprings'') from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. None were received.
As such, these final results do not differ from the Preliminary
Results. We find that Reztec Industries Sdn Bhd (``Reztec'') did not
sell subject merchandise during the period of review (``POR''),
February 1, 2010, through January 31, 2011 and, thus we are rescinding
the administrative review, in part, with respect to Reztec. We
additionally find that Goodnite Sdn Bhd (``Goodnite'') failed to
cooperate to the best of its ability when it did not respond to the
Department's original questionnaire and, therefore, we have assigned
Goodnite's a rate based on total adverse facts available (``AFA''). The
final dumping margin for this administrative review is listed in the
``Final Results of Review'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic
of China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part,
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 76126 (December
6, 2011) (``Preliminary Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective April 12, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Operations,
[[Page 21962]]
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4031.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As noted above, on December 6, 2011, the Department published in
the Federal Register the Preliminary Results of the administrative
review of innersprings from the PRC. The Department did not receive
comments from interested parties on the Preliminary Results.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We have not made any changes to the Preliminary Results.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is uncovered innerspring units
composed of a series of individual metal springs joined together in
sizes corresponding to the sizes of adult mattresses (e.g., twin, twin
long, full, full long, queen, California king and king) and units used
in smaller constructions, such as crib and youth mattresses. All
uncovered innerspring units are included in the scope regardless of
width and length. Included within this definition are innersprings
typically ranging from 30.5 inches to 76 inches in width and 68 inches
to 84 inches in length. Innersprings for crib mattresses typically
range from 25 inches to 27 inches in width and 50 inches to 52 inches
in length.
Uncovered innerspring units are suitable for use as the innerspring
component in the manufacture of innerspring mattresses, including
mattresses that incorporate a foam encasement around the innerspring.
Pocketed and non-pocketed innerspring units are included in this
definition. Non-pocketed innersprings are typically joined together
with helical wire and border rods. Non-pocketed innersprings are
included in this definition regardless of whether they have border rods
attached to the perimeter of the innerspring. Pocketed innersprings are
individual coils covered by a ``pocket'' or ``sock'' of a nonwoven
synthetic material or woven material and then glued together in a
linear fashion.
Uncovered innersprings are classified under subheading 9404.29.9010
and have also been classified under subheadings 9404.10.0000,
7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, or 7320.90.5010 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). The HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written
description of the scope of the order is dispositive.
Final Partial Rescission
In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily rescinded
the review with respect to Reztec.\2\ In this administrative review,
Reztec reported that it had no shipments of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR. As a result, the Department issued a no-
shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs Border and Protection (``CBP''),
asking that CBP provide any information contrary to our preliminary
findings of no entries of subject merchandise for merchandise
manufactured and shipped by Reztec.\3\ We did not receive any response
from CBP, thus indicating that there were no entries of subject
merchandise into the United States exported by Reztec. After issuing
the Preliminary Results, the Department did not receive any comments
from interested parties regarding the rescission of this company.
Therefore, the Department is rescinding the administrative review with
respect to Reztec.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See id., at 76127.
\3\ See Memoranda to Michael Walsh, Director, AD/CVD/Revenue
Policy & Programs, from Jim Doyle, Office Director, dated between
October 28, 2010, to December 17, 2010, Request for U.S. Entry
Documents: Certain Steel Nails from the People's Republic of China.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
The dumping margin for the POR is as follows:
Innersprings From the PRC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin
Manufacturer/Exporter (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodnite \4\............................................... 234.51
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department intends
to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of the final results of review. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), we will calculate importer-specific (or customer) ad
valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of
the dumping margins calculated for the examined sales to the total
entered value of those same sales. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate, without regard to
antidumping duties, all entries of subject merchandise during the POR
for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Department notes that this antidumping duty margin
applies only to Goodnite's subject merchandise, which is limited to
PRC-origin merchandise. See Preliminary Results at 76127.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above
that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (2) for
all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to
be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-
wide rate of 234.51 percent; (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporters that supplied
that non-PRC exporter; and (4) for Goodnite the cash deposit rate will
be 234.51 percent. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as
a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order
(``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction
of proprietary information disclosed under the APO, which continues to
govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested.
[[Page 21963]]
Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: April 3, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-8863 Filed 4-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
