Foundry Coke Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 20788-20789 [2012-8368]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
20788
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 67 / Friday, April 6, 2012 / Notices
These preliminary results of
administrative review are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 30, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–8383 Filed 4–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–855, A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the Republic of Korea and the
People’s Republic of China: Extension
of Time Limits for the Final Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: April 6, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Sergio Balbontin or Yang Jin Chun, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–6478 or (202) 482–
5760, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 6, 2011, the Department
of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the administrative
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on diamond sawblades and parts thereof
(diamond sawblades) from the Republic
of Korea (Korea) and the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). See Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 76 FR 76128 (December 6, 2011)
(Preliminary Results—Korea) and
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Intent
to Rescind Review in Part, 76 FR 76135
(December 6, 2011) (Preliminary
Results—PRC). On March 13, 2012, we
extended the deadline for the final
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from the PRC. See Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the
People’s Republic of China: Extension of
Time Limit for Final Results of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Apr 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 77 FR 14733 (March 13, 2012).
The final results of the administrative
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on diamond sawblades from Korea and
the PRC are currently due no later than
April 4, 2012, and May 14, 2012,
respectively.
Extension of Time Limits for the Final
Results of Reviews
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to issue final results
within 120 days after the date on which
the preliminary results are published.
However, if it is not practicable to
complete the review within this time
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
allows the Department to extend the
time period to a maximum of 180 days
after the date on which the preliminary
results are published.
We determine that it is not practicable
to complete the final results of these
reviews within the current time limits
because we need additional time to
consider new allegations in both the
PRC and Korea proceedings. Section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(‘‘Act’’) allows us to extend the deadline
for the final results of these reviews to
June 3, 2012, which is 180 days after the
date of the publication of the
Preliminary Results—Korea and the
Preliminary Results—PRC. Because June
3, 2012, falls on a weekend, we shall
issue the final results of these reviews
on June 4, 2012. See Notice of
Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to
the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70
FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: March 30, 2012.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–8370 Filed 4–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
On December 1, 2011, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) initiated the second
five-year (‘‘sunset’’) review of the
antidumping duty order on foundry
coke products (‘‘foundry coke’’) from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’). On the
basis of a notice of intent to participate,
and an adequate substantive response
filed on behalf of the domestic
interested parties,1 as well as a lack of
response from respondent interested
parties, the Department conducted an
expedited sunset review of the
antidumping duty order, pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1). As a result of the
sunset review, the Department finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on foundry coke from the PRC
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping at the levels
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of
Review’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: April 6, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Moats and Ricardo Martinez
Rivera, AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5047 and (202)
482–4532, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On December 1, 2011, the Department
initiated the second sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on foundry
coke from the PRC,2 pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(c)(2). The Department received
a notice of intent to participate from the
domestic interested parties within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). The domestic
interested parties claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of
the Act, as a manufacturer of a domestic
like product in the United States.
We received a complete substantive
response from the domestic interested
parties within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We
received no responses from respondent
interested parties. As a result, the
[A–570–862]
Foundry Coke Products From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Expedited Second Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 ABC Coke, Erie Coke, Tonawanda Coke, and
Walker Coke (collectively, the ‘‘domestic interested
parties’’).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 76
FR 74775 (December 1, 2011); see also Notice of
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order:
Foundry Coke Products from The People’s Republic
of China 66 FR 48025 (September 17, 2001)
(‘‘Order’’).
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 67 / Friday, April 6, 2012 / Notices
Department conducted an expedited
sunset review of the Order, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.218(e)(1).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The product covered under the
antidumping duty order is coke larger
than 100 mm (4 inches) in maximum
diameter and at least 50 percent of
which is retained on a 100 mm (4 inch)
sieve, of a kind used in foundries. The
foundry coke products subject to the
antidumping duty order were
classifiable under subheading
2704.00.00.10 (as of Jan 1, 2000) and are
currently classifiable under subheading
2704.00.00.11 (as of July 1, 2000) of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and Customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of the
Order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Expedited Second Sunset Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on
Foundry Coke from the People’s
Republic of China’’ (‘‘Decision
Memorandum’’) from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
dated concurrently with and hereby
adopted by this notice. The issues
discussed in the Decision Memorandum
include (1) the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margins likely
to prevail if the Order was to be
revoked; and (2) the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail. Parties may
find a complete discussion of all issues
raised in the review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file
electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’). Access to IA ACCESS is
available in the Central Records Unit
room 7046 of the main Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Decision Memorandum
can be access directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The signed
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the
Order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Apr 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
at the following weighted-average
percentage margins:
20789
A preliminary web-based
meeting or teleconference will be held
on Wednesday, May 23, 2012, from 1:30
Weightedp.m. to 3:30 p.m. Eastern time. This
Manufacturers/exporters/proaverage
meeting is intended to be a precursor to
ducers
margin
any subsequent face-to-face meeting and
(percent)
will serve to provide further information
and orientation regarding the objectives
Shanxi Dajin International
(Group) Co. Ltd .....................
101.62 of the WG. To register for this
Sinochem International Co. Ltd
105.91 preliminary meeting, please submit your
Minmetals Townlord Techfull name, email address, and phone
nology Co. Ltd .......................
75.58 number to Mr. John Barton by April 30,
CITIC Trading Company, Ltd ...
48.55
2012, using the contact information
PRC–Wide Rate .......................
214.89
provided below.
ADDRESSES: The preliminary meeting
Notice Regarding Administrative
will be held using either a
Protective Order (‘‘APO’’)
teleconference or a web-based format
This notice also serves as the only
where participants will join the meeting
reminder to parties subject to APO of
remotely by telephone and/or computer.
their responsibility concerning the
Once registered, participants will
return or destruction of proprietary
receive login and/or call-in instructions
information disclosed under APO in
via email.
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Timely notification of the return of
John Barton, NIST, Office of Weights
destruction of APO materials or
and Measures, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop
conversion to judicial protective order is 2600, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–2600.
hereby requested. Failure to comply
You may also contact Mr. Barton by
with the regulations and terms of an
telephone (301) 975–4002 or by email at
APO is a violation which is subject to
john.barton@nist.gov.
sanction.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
This sunset review and notice are in
formation of this WG is intended to
accordance with sections 751(c), 752,
bring together government officials and
and 771(i)(1) of the Act.
representatives of business, industry,
Dated: March 30, 2012.
trade associations, and consumer
Paul Piquado,
organizations on the subject of
Assistant Secretary for Import
standards and test procedures used in
Administration.
the testing of commercial measuring
[FR Doc. 2012–8368 Filed 4–5–12; 8:45 am]
devices and systems by regulatory
officials and service companies. NIST
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
participates to promote uniformity
among the states in laws, regulations,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
methods, and testing equipment that
comprises the regulatory control of
National Institute of Standards and
commercial weighing and measuring
Technology
devices and systems and other trade and
Work Group on Measuring Systems for commerce issues.
The WG will review existing
Taxis
requirements and test procedures
currently referenced in HB 44 Section
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards
5.54., Taximeters Code, and propose
and Technology, Commerce.
changes as needed. They will also
ACTION: Notice.
identify gaps between the Code and
SUMMARY: The National Institute of
technologies currently in use in taxi
Standards and Technology (NIST) is
applications. Additionally, the WG will
forming a Work Group (WG) to develop
identify and develop proposed
proposals to revise the current
modifications to HB 44 regarding
Taximeters Code in NIST Handbook 44
inspection procedures used by
(HB 44), Specifications, Tolerances, and regulatory weights and measures
Other Technical Requirements for
officials. These changes will be
Weighing and Measuring Devices, to
presented as proposals through the
adequately address emerging
National Conference on Weights and
technologies used to assess charges
Measures (NCWM).
based on time and/or distance
Included among the topics to be
measurements in taxi applications and
discussed by the WG for current and
to ensure that the prescribed
emerging device technologies used in
methodologies and standards facilitate
commercial distance measuring systems
measurements that are traceable to the
are: Metrology laboratory standards and
International System of Units (SI).
test procedures, uncertainties,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20788-20789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8368]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-862]
Foundry Coke Products From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 1, 2011, the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') initiated the second five-year (``sunset'') review of
the antidumping duty order on foundry coke products (``foundry coke'')
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``Act''). On the basis of
a notice of intent to participate, and an adequate substantive response
filed on behalf of the domestic interested parties,\1\ as well as a
lack of response from respondent interested parties, the Department
conducted an expedited sunset review of the antidumping duty order,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1).
As a result of the sunset review, the Department finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on foundry coke from the PRC would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels
indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ABC Coke, Erie Coke, Tonawanda Coke, and Walker Coke
(collectively, the ``domestic interested parties'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: April 6, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Moats and Ricardo Martinez
Rivera, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5047
and (202) 482-4532, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2011, the Department initiated the second sunset
review of the antidumping duty order on foundry coke from the PRC,\2\
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2). The
Department received a notice of intent to participate from the domestic
interested parties within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). The domestic interested parties claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer of a
domestic like product in the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 76 FR 74775
(December 1, 2011); see also Notice of Amended Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Foundry
Coke Products from The People's Republic of China 66 FR 48025
(September 17, 2001) (``Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We received a complete substantive response from the domestic
interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no responses from respondent interested
parties. As a result, the
[[Page 20789]]
Department conducted an expedited sunset review of the Order, pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1).
Scope of the Order
The product covered under the antidumping duty order is coke larger
than 100 mm (4 inches) in maximum diameter and at least 50 percent of
which is retained on a 100 mm (4 inch) sieve, of a kind used in
foundries. The foundry coke products subject to the antidumping duty
order were classifiable under subheading 2704.00.00.10 (as of Jan 1,
2000) and are currently classifiable under subheading 2704.00.00.11 (as
of July 1, 2000) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and Customs purposes, our written description of the scope
of the Order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Second
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Foundry Coke from the
People's Republic of China'' (``Decision Memorandum'') from Christian
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include (1) the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude
of the margins likely to prevail if the Order was to be revoked; and
(2) the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail. Parties may find a
complete discussion of all issues raised in the review and the
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on
file electronically via Import Administration's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (``IA
ACCESS''). Access to IA ACCESS is available in the Central Records Unit
room 7046 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete
version of the Decision Memorandum can be access directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The signed Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the following weighted-
average percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturers/exporters/producers margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanxi Dajin International (Group) Co. Ltd................. 101.62
Sinochem International Co. Ltd............................. 105.91
Minmetals Townlord Technology Co. Ltd...................... 75.58
CITIC Trading Company, Ltd................................. 48.55
PRC-Wide Rate.............................................. 214.89
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice Regarding Administrative Protective Order (``APO'')
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305. Timely notification of the return of destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This sunset review and notice are in accordance with sections
751(c), 752, and 771(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 30, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-8368 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
