Sunwest Rollover Member LLC; Notice of Application, 20442-20445 [2012-8061]

Download as PDF 20442 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 4, 2012 / Notices For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Jennie Rankin, Project Manager, Licensing Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2012–8111 Filed 4–3–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) invites the public and other Federal agencies to comment on a proposed information collection concerning participation in conventional proceedings as part of our review of the OSHRC Settlement Part program. OSHRC will submit the proposed information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before June 4, 2012. ADDRESSES: Submit all written comments, identified by the title ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection—Conventional Proceedings’’, by mail or hand delivery to John X. Cerveny, Deputy Executive Secretary, Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 1120 20th Street NW., Washington, DC 20036–3457, by fax to 202–606–5050, or by email to pracomments@oshrc.gov. SUMMARY: emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for information or copies of the proposed information collection instrument should be directed to John X. Cerveny, Deputy Executive Secretary, Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 1120 20th Street NW., Ninth Floor, Washington, DC 20036– 3457; Telephone (202) 606–5706; email address: pracomments@oshrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSHRC’s Settlement Part program, codified at 29 CFR 2200.120, is designed to encourage settlements on contested citations issued by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and to reduce litigation costs. The program requires employers who receive job safety or health citations that include proposed penalties of $100,000 or more in total to VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Apr 03, 2012 Jkt 226001 participate in formal settlement talks presided over by an OSHRC Administrative Law Judge. If settlement efforts fail, the case would continue under OSHRC’s conventional proceedings, usually before a judge other than the one who presided over the settlement proceedings. OSHRC has submitted for OMB review a proposed information collection from participants in the Settlement Part program. A copy of that information collection request (ICR) with applicable supporting documentation may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Web site, https:// www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, or by contacting John X. Cerveny, Deputy Executive Secretary, Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 1120 20th Street NW., Ninth Floor, Washington, DC 20036– 3457; Telephone (202) 606–5706; email address: pracomments@oshrc.gov. OSHRC proposes to conduct a second voluntary survey of employer, Department of Labor (OSHA) personnel (decision makers), Authorized Employee Representatives, and their representatives, including attorneys, who personally participated in OSHRC cases between February 15, 2011 and June 30, 2012, where a total proposed penalty between $50,000 and $99,999 was involved and where OSHRC Settlement Part Process procedures were not used. The cases would include those settled by the parties without an OSHRC judge conducting a face-to-face settlement proceeding, as well as any cases within the above dollar range that went to a trial on the merits. These cases would be considered part of a control group. Participant responses will be used for comparative purposes and to facilitate our understanding of the efficacy of the Settlement Part program. The proposed information collection instrument is a written survey consisting of a series of questions to determine participants’ level of satisfaction with OSHRC processes and outcomes. They are intended to take a respondent no more than 30 minutes to complete. The respondents may skip any questions that they do not feel comfortable answering, and are permitted to comment further on their experiences at the end of the questionnaire. OSHRC will submit the proposed information collection to the Office of Management and Budget for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). OSHRC invites comments on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 performance of the agency’s functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. OMB Control Number: Not applicable, new request. Form Number: Not applicable. Type of Review: Regular submission (new information collection). Title: Survey of Participants in OSHRC Conventional Proceedings where between $50,000 and $99,999 is at issue. Description: Information collection required to evaluate the Review Commission’s Settlement Part process. Affected Public: Employer and Department of Labor (OSHA) personnel (decision makers), Authorized Employee Representatives, and their representatives, including attorneys, who have personally participated in OSHRC cases between February 15, 2011 and June 30, 2012, where a total proposed penalty between $50,000 and $99,999 was involved and where OSHRC Settlement Part Process procedures were not used. Estimated Number of Respondents: 500. Estimated Time per Response: 30 minutes. Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 250 hours. Obligation To Respond: Voluntary. Dated: March 30, 2012. Debra Hall, Acting Executive Director. [FR Doc. 2012–8124 Filed 4–3–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7600–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Investment Company Act Release No. 30014; File No. 812–13778] Sunwest Rollover Member LLC; Notice of Application March 29, 2012. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’). AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM 04APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 4, 2012 / Notices Notice of an application for exemption under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’). Applicant’s Representations Jill Ehrlich, Senior Counsel, at (202) 551– 6819, or Mary Kay Frech, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6821 (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation). Interests consist of common interests and class A preferred units, each as defined in the limited liability company agreement governing Blackstone LLC (‘‘Blackstone LLC Agreement’’). 2 Applicant’s limited liability company agreement requires that two of the three members of the Board of Managers are not ‘‘interested persons’’ as defined in the Act. 3 The acquisition of the Sunwest Assets by Blackstone LLC is referred to herein as the ‘‘Blackstone Acquisition.’’ The Blackstone Acquisition is governed by the terms and conditions of an Agreement of Purchase, Sale and Contribution dated as of January 15, 2010, and amended on February 12, 2010, March 25, 2010 and July 13, 2010 (‘‘PSA’’). 4 The TIC Investors and the LLC Investors are referred to herein, collectively, as ‘‘Sunwest Investors.’’ ACTION: 1. Applicant is a Delaware limited liability company formed for the purpose of holding equity interests SUMMARY: Summary of Application: (‘‘Rollover Equity Interests’’) in BRE/SW Sunwest Rollover Member LLC Portfolio LLC (‘‘Blackstone LLC’’),1 a (‘‘Applicant’’) requests an order of the Delaware limited liability company, to Commission pursuant to sections 6(c) resolve the bankruptcy of Sunwest (as and 6(e) of the Act exempting it from all defined below). Applicant is managed provisions of the Act and the rules by a three-person board of managers thereunder, except sections 9, 17(a), (‘‘Board of Managers’’) elected by the 17(d) and 17(e), section 31, as modified members of Applicant.2 Although herein (‘‘Modified Section 31’’), and Applicant is authorized to exist until sections 36 through 53 of the Act and December 31, 2020, Applicant expects the rules thereunder. Applicant would that Blackstone LLC will have a limited be exempt until the earlier of August 5, life of up to five years from its 2015 or such time as it no longer meets acquisition of the Sunwest Assets (as the definition of an investment defined below) and similarly also company under the Act. expects to liquidate and dissolve by DATES: Filing Dates: The application was August 5, 2015. filed on May 28, 2010, and amended on 2. Blackstone LLC was formed to June 17, 2010, June 28, 2010, July 8, acquire substantially all of the core 2010, October 8, 2010, February 22, assets (consisting of more than 140 2011, September 6, 2011, and March 22, senior living facilities throughout the 2012. United States) (collectively, the Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An ‘‘Sunwest Assets’’) of ‘‘Sunwest,’’ a group of related entities formerly order granting the application will be involved in the acquisition, issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request development, design, construction, financing, insuring and operation of a hearing by writing to the senior living and other properties Commission’s Secretary and serving nationwide, along with miscellaneous applicant with a copy of the request, other related assets and operations.3 personally or by mail. Hearing requests 3. Prior to 2008, Sunwest operated should be received by the Commission 290 facilities and was one of the largest by 5:30 p.m. on April 23, 2012 and assisted living providers in the United should be accompanied by proof of States. Sunwest financed the acquisition service on applicant, in the form of an and development of its senior living and affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of other properties through various means, service. Hearing requests should state including the sale to investors of tenantthe nature of the writer’s interest, the in-common interests (‘‘TIC Investors’’) reasons for the request, and the issues and limited liability company interests contested. Persons who wish to be (‘‘LLC Investors’’) in properties owned notified of a hearing may request by Sunwest.4 On December 1, 2008, notification by writing to the Stayton SW Assisted Living, L.L.C., one Commission’s Secretary. of the Sunwest entities (‘‘Debtor’’), ADDRESSES: Elizabeth M. Murphy, initiated its bankruptcy case Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange (‘‘Bankruptcy Case’’) with the filing of a Commission, 100 F Street NE., voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of Washington, DC 20549–1090. Title 11 of the United States Code. Applicant, 2300 SW First Avenue, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97201–5047. 1 Applicant states that the Rollover Equity FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The following is a summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained via the Commission’s Web site by searching for the file number, or an applicant using the Company name box, at https:// www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551–8090. emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:11 Apr 03, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 20443 4. On March 2, 2009, the Commission filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (‘‘District Court’’) alleging that Sunwest Management Inc. committed violations of the federal securities laws in the offering of interests in Sunwest.5 On March 10, 2009, the District Court entered an order in the SEC Enforcement Action granting an injunction and appointing a receiver over the Sunwest entities. On December 22, 2009, the District Court entered an order providing that all assets and liabilities of Sunwest were consolidated into the Bankruptcy Case, that equitable title to real estate held by Sunwest was consolidated into Debtor’s bankruptcy estate, and that Debtor had the right to convey title to, or interests in, real property pursuant to a confirmed plan of reorganization or other order of the District Court. 5. On January 15, 2010, the Debtor and Blackstone LLC entered into the PSA providing for the sale or contribution of substantially all of the core assets of Sunwest, including the interests in the properties owned by the TIC Investors and the LLC Investors, to Blackstone LLC or a successful bidder who placed a higher bid at the ensuing auction. After the bid deadline established for such auction expired, the District Court entered its order identifying and approving Blackstone LLC as the successful bidder and purchaser under the PSA. The Blackstone Acquisition closed on August 5, 2010. 6. Applicants state that due to the complex and unusual capital structure of Sunwest, outright sale of the Sunwest Assets to Blackstone LLC likely would have resulted in adverse income tax consequences to numerous Sunwest Investors. Applicant states that, to address tax consequences and certain valuation concerns of Sunwest Investors, the PSA and the Debtor’s plan of reorganization provided that the consideration paid by Blackstone LLC in acquiring the Sunwest Assets would, at the election of Sunwest Investors, take the form of a combination of cash and/ or issuance of Rollover Equity Interests. Sunwest Investors who elected to receive interests in the Applicant contributed their interests in the Sunwest Assets and the bankruptcy estate to Applicant in exchange for, at their election: Applicant’s common units or preferred units.6 Applicant in 5 SEC v. Sunwest Management, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. CV 09–6056 HO (‘‘SEC Enforcement Action’’). 6 Applicant states that no Sunwest Investor was required to receive interests in Applicant; only E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM Continued 04APN1 20444 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 4, 2012 / Notices emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES turn contributed the property interests to Blackstone LLC. The terms of Applicant’s common units and preferred units mirror the terms of the Rollover Equity Interests that are held by Applicant.7 7. Applicant states that its assets consist exclusively of the Rollover Equity Interests and the following shortterm instruments pending distributions to Applicant’s members or disbursements in payment of Applicant’s obligations: (a) General obligations of the United States, or its agencies and instrumentalities; and/or (b) deposit accounts with banks, which accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or an equivalent insuring organization (collectively, the ‘‘Temporary Investments’’).8 8. Applicant states that the District Court has been actively involved in all aspects of the Debtor’s reorganization, including the development of Applicant’s capital structure and the terms of the Blackstone Acquisition.9 In addition, committees of unsecured creditors and TIC Investors were established in 2009 to represent the interests of Sunwest Investors and creditors, and representatives of these committees considered and discussed numerous alternative methods of maximizing the value of Sunwest Investors’ interests in Sunwest, including development of a stand-alone plan of reorganization and the acquisition of Sunwest properties by third parties. The Blackstone Acquisition was eventually determined to be the most favorable alternative available to Sunwest Investors and creditors. Applicant states that the negotiations which led to both the structure of Applicant and the terms of the PSA with Blackstone LLC were Sunwest Investors who voluntarily elected to receive interests in Applicant became members of Applicant. In addition, Applicant states that neither the common interests nor class A preferred units that constitute the Rollover Equity Interests were over-subscribed, so certain over-subscription procedures developed in the Bankruptcy Case did not become applicable. 7 Applicant also issued a third class of securities to certain founders of Sunwest (‘‘Sunwest Founders’’) that consists of contingent non-voting profits interests (‘‘Profits Interests’’). The Profits Interests entitle Sunwest Founders to receive a portion of Applicant’s earnings if total distributions and payments to Sunwest’s general unsecured creditors and Sunwest Investors (not including Sunwest Founders) aggregate in excess of $500 million. Applicant states that it is unlikely that the Profits Interests will ever have value. 8 Applicant’s sole source of revenue is and will continue to be its investment in Blackstone LLC (other than any income from Temporary Investments). 9 Applicant will continue to be subject to the jurisdiction of the District Court. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Apr 03, 2012 Jkt 226001 protracted, conducted at arm’s-length, and actively participated in by Sunwest Investors and their representatives, counsel, investment bankers and other advisors. 9. The Blackstone LLC Agreement permits Blackstone LLC’s board of directors to approve a proposal by BRE/ SW Member LLC (a member of Blackstone LLC, ‘‘BREA’’) to request that its members, including Applicant, make additional capital contributions if BREA determines in good faith: (a) That Blackstone LLC requires additional capital to meet its financial obligations; or (b) that raising additional capital for additional investment purposes is advisable and in the best interests of Blackstone LLC; provided, however, such additional investments shall not include additional facilities unless they are contiguous or adjacent to ‘‘properties’’ (defined in the Blackstone LLC Agreement to include specified assisted living, memory care and skilled nursing facilities) existing as of the date of the Blackstone LLC Agreement. In addition, Applicant’s limited liability company agreement permits Applicant to raise capital only for the purpose of paying Applicant’s expenses or responding to a capital request from Blackstone LLC.10 Any offering by Applicant, whether to pay its expenses or to raise capital in response to a capital call from Blackstone LLC, must be conducted in compliance with federal and state securities laws.11 In any event, Applicant believes it is unlikely that Applicant or Blackstone LLC will request any additional capital. Applicant’s Analysis 1. Applicant requests an order of the Commission pursuant to sections 6(c) and 6(e) of the Act exempting it from all provisions of the Act and the rules thereunder, except sections 9, 17(a), 17(d) and 17(e), Modified Section 31, and sections 36 through 53 of the Act and the rules thereunder. Applicant requests relief until the earlier of August 5, 2015 or such time as Applicant no 10 Applicant does not anticipate that there will be significant distributions to Applicant in the initial years of operation of Blackstone LLC, but that Applicant will have significant administrative, compliance and similar expenses. Therefore, Blackstone LLC has agreed to reimburse Applicant $400,000 each year, and the Debtor has agreed to loan Applicant up to a total of $2 million to permit Applicant to pay its expenses. 11 Applicant states that, if it were to sell any additional securities, the securities would be sold to Applicant’s members and not to third parties. Applicant states that an offering likely would be made only to accredited investors under Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 and all members of Applicant received notice of such a possibility before electing to invest in Applicant. PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 longer meets the definition of an investment company under the Act. 2. Applicant states that it meets the definition of an investment company, as defined in section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Act, because: (a) Applicant has acquired investment securities (i.e., interests in Blackstone LLC) having a value exceeding 40% of the value of Applicant’s total assets; and (b) none of the exemptions or exceptions specified in the Act apply to Applicant in its current form. Applicant states that, if the Commission does not issue the requested relief, Applicant may be required to devote scarce financial and other resources to comply with provisions of the Act that Applicant argues are not relevant or necessary under Applicant’s circumstances. Applicant also states that, although it was formed as a limited liability company rather than a liquidating trust, in terms of its structure and function, as well as the policies underlying the Act, Applicant is indistinguishable from liquidating trusts and other entities that have been granted similar exemptions by the Commission in the past.12 Applicant states that it is structured with the goal of liquidating the Sunwest Assets in an orderly manner and distributing the liquidation proceeds to its investors. 3. Section 6(c) provides that the Commission may by order upon application exempt any person or persons, or any transaction or transactions, from any provision of the Act if such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes of the Act. Section 6(e) provides that, in connection with any order exempting an investment company from any provision of section 7, certain provisions of the Act, as specified by the Commission, shall apply to the company and other persons dealing with the company as if such company were a registered investment company. 4. Applicant states that it will be subject to all of section 31 and the rules thereunder, except that rule 31a–1(a) will be modified to require retention of the documents that constitute the record forming the basis for the quarterly unaudited financial statements and the annual audited financial statements that Applicant will provide to its members, rather than the documents forming the 12 Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc., Investment Company Act Release Nos. 18643 (April 1, 1992) (notice) and 18675 (April 24, 1992) (order) and LTV Aerospace Creditors Liquidating Trust, Investment Company Act Release Nos. 19596 (July 26, 1993) (notice) and 19648 (August 24, 1993) (order). E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM 04APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 4, 2012 / Notices basis for the financial statements that would be filed pursuant to section 30 of the Act. Under the requested relief, Applicant will provide to its members: (i) Annual audited financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and rule 1–02(d) of Regulation S–X; and (ii) unaudited quarterly financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 5. Applicant contends that the following factors, among others, are appropriate grounds for the requested relief, particularly in view of the provisions of the Act that will apply to Applicant: (i) Sunwest Investors who were eligible to receive interests in Applicant, their counsel, investment bankers and other advisors, as well as the District Court and its appointed mediators, were active participants in designing and determining Applicant’s structure; (ii) Applicant will continue to be subject to the jurisdiction of the District Court; (iii) transferability of Applicant’s securities is severely restricted; 13 (iv) Applicant has a limited life and will liquidate upon the liquidation of Blackstone LLC; and (v) Applicant will not be engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, and the only securities that Applicant may hold are its interests in Blackstone LLC and Temporary Investments pending distributions to Applicant’s members or disbursements in payment of Applicant’s obligations. 6. Accordingly, Applicant believes that the issuance of the order pursuant to sections 6(c) and 6(e) is appropriate in the public interest, and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Applicant’s Conditions Applicant agrees that any order of the Commission granting the requested relief will be subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant will not own or hold securities other than: (a) Interests in Blackstone LLC and (b) Temporary Investments. 2. Applicant will not offer additional securities to its members, except in connection with capital requests from Blackstone LLC or to pay its expenses. 3. If Applicant sells additional securities, such securities would be sold at a price equal to or greater than the net asset value of the securities at the time of the offering. 13 Among other restrictions, Applicant states that it will limit transfers to transfers among members or affiliates of members. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Apr 03, 2012 Jkt 226001 4. Applicant’s governing documents will not be amended to permit Applicant’s securities to be freely tradable. 5. Applicant will provide to its members: (a) Quarterly unaudited financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and (b) annual audited financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and rule 1–02(d) of Regulation S–X. 6. Applicant will be exempt until the earlier of August 5, 2015 or such time as Applicant no longer meets the definition of an investment company under the Act. 7. Applicant will not hold itself out as an investment company. For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority. Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–8061 Filed 4–3–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [File No. 500–1] eMax Worldwide, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading April 2, 2012. It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of eMax Worldwide, Inc. (CIK: 0000830519) because there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning its securities. eMax Worldwide, Inc. has failed to make periodic filings with the Commission and has more than 300 shareholders of record. eMax Worldwide, Inc. is quoted on OTC Markets Group Inc. under the ticker EMXC. The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of eMax Worldwide, Inc. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of eMax Worldwide, Inc. is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 2, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 16, 2012. By the Commission. Jill M. Peterson, Assistant Secretary. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–66679; File No. SR–FICC– 2012–03] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change to Expand the One-Pot Cross-Margining Program With New York Portfolio Clearing, LLC to Certain ‘‘Market Professionals’’ March 29, 2012. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder 2 notice is hereby given that on March 20, 2012, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared primarily by FICC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The proposed rule change consists of modifications to certain rules of the Government Securities Division (‘‘GSD’’) of the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’). II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, FICC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. FICC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.3 (A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change FICC is proposing to expand its existing one-pot cross-margining program with New York Portfolio 1 15 [FR Doc. 2012–8165 Filed 4–2–12; 11:15 am] Sfmt 4703 20445 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 The Commission has modified the text of the summaries prepared by FICC. 2 17 E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM 04APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20442-20445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8061]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 30014; File No. 812-13778]


Sunwest Rollover Member LLC; Notice of Application

March 29, 2012.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

[[Page 20443]]


ACTION: Notice of an application for exemption under the Investment 
Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Summary of Application: Sunwest Rollover Member LLC 
(``Applicant'') requests an order of the Commission pursuant to 
sections 6(c) and 6(e) of the Act exempting it from all provisions of 
the Act and the rules thereunder, except sections 9, 17(a), 17(d) and 
17(e), section 31, as modified herein (``Modified Section 31''), and 
sections 36 through 53 of the Act and the rules thereunder. Applicant 
would be exempt until the earlier of August 5, 2015 or such time as it 
no longer meets the definition of an investment company under the Act.

DATES: Filing Dates: The application was filed on May 28, 2010, and 
amended on June 17, 2010, June 28, 2010, July 8, 2010, October 8, 2010, 
February 22, 2011, September 6, 2011, and March 22, 2012.
    Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the 
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. 
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's 
Secretary and serving applicant with a copy of the request, personally 
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 
5:30 p.m. on April 23, 2012 and should be accompanied by proof of 
service on applicant, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a 
certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the 
writer's interest, the reasons for the request, and the issues 
contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request 
notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicant, 
2300 SW First Avenue, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97201-5047.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill Ehrlich, Senior Counsel, at (202) 
551-6819, or Mary Kay Frech, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821 (Division 
of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
application. The complete application may be obtained via the 
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or an applicant 
using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or 
by calling (202) 551-8090.

Applicant's Representations

    1. Applicant is a Delaware limited liability company formed for the 
purpose of holding equity interests (``Rollover Equity Interests'') in 
BRE/SW Portfolio LLC (``Blackstone LLC''),\1\ a Delaware limited 
liability company, to resolve the bankruptcy of Sunwest (as defined 
below). Applicant is managed by a three-person board of managers 
(``Board of Managers'') elected by the members of Applicant.\2\ 
Although Applicant is authorized to exist until December 31, 2020, 
Applicant expects that Blackstone LLC will have a limited life of up to 
five years from its acquisition of the Sunwest Assets (as defined 
below) and similarly also expects to liquidate and dissolve by August 
5, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Applicant states that the Rollover Equity Interests consist 
of common interests and class A preferred units, each as defined in 
the limited liability company agreement governing Blackstone LLC 
(``Blackstone LLC Agreement'').
    \2\ Applicant's limited liability company agreement requires 
that two of the three members of the Board of Managers are not 
``interested persons'' as defined in the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Blackstone LLC was formed to acquire substantially all of the 
core assets (consisting of more than 140 senior living facilities 
throughout the United States) (collectively, the ``Sunwest Assets'') of 
``Sunwest,'' a group of related entities formerly involved in the 
acquisition, development, design, construction, financing, insuring and 
operation of senior living and other properties nationwide, along with 
miscellaneous other related assets and operations.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The acquisition of the Sunwest Assets by Blackstone LLC is 
referred to herein as the ``Blackstone Acquisition.'' The Blackstone 
Acquisition is governed by the terms and conditions of an Agreement 
of Purchase, Sale and Contribution dated as of January 15, 2010, and 
amended on February 12, 2010, March 25, 2010 and July 13, 2010 
(``PSA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Prior to 2008, Sunwest operated 290 facilities and was one of 
the largest assisted living providers in the United States. Sunwest 
financed the acquisition and development of its senior living and other 
properties through various means, including the sale to investors of 
tenant-in-common interests (``TIC Investors'') and limited liability 
company interests (``LLC Investors'') in properties owned by 
Sunwest.\4\ On December 1, 2008, Stayton SW Assisted Living, L.L.C., 
one of the Sunwest entities (``Debtor''), initiated its bankruptcy case 
(``Bankruptcy Case'') with the filing of a voluntary petition under 
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The TIC Investors and the LLC Investors are referred to 
herein, collectively, as ``Sunwest Investors.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. On March 2, 2009, the Commission filed a complaint in the U.S. 
District Court for the District of Oregon (``District Court'') alleging 
that Sunwest Management Inc. committed violations of the federal 
securities laws in the offering of interests in Sunwest.\5\ On March 
10, 2009, the District Court entered an order in the SEC Enforcement 
Action granting an injunction and appointing a receiver over the 
Sunwest entities. On December 22, 2009, the District Court entered an 
order providing that all assets and liabilities of Sunwest were 
consolidated into the Bankruptcy Case, that equitable title to real 
estate held by Sunwest was consolidated into Debtor's bankruptcy 
estate, and that Debtor had the right to convey title to, or interests 
in, real property pursuant to a confirmed plan of reorganization or 
other order of the District Court.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ SEC v. Sunwest Management, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. CV 
09-6056 HO (``SEC Enforcement Action'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. On January 15, 2010, the Debtor and Blackstone LLC entered into 
the PSA providing for the sale or contribution of substantially all of 
the core assets of Sunwest, including the interests in the properties 
owned by the TIC Investors and the LLC Investors, to Blackstone LLC or 
a successful bidder who placed a higher bid at the ensuing auction. 
After the bid deadline established for such auction expired, the 
District Court entered its order identifying and approving Blackstone 
LLC as the successful bidder and purchaser under the PSA. The 
Blackstone Acquisition closed on August 5, 2010.
    6. Applicants state that due to the complex and unusual capital 
structure of Sunwest, outright sale of the Sunwest Assets to Blackstone 
LLC likely would have resulted in adverse income tax consequences to 
numerous Sunwest Investors. Applicant states that, to address tax 
consequences and certain valuation concerns of Sunwest Investors, the 
PSA and the Debtor's plan of reorganization provided that the 
consideration paid by Blackstone LLC in acquiring the Sunwest Assets 
would, at the election of Sunwest Investors, take the form of a 
combination of cash and/or issuance of Rollover Equity Interests. 
Sunwest Investors who elected to receive interests in the Applicant 
contributed their interests in the Sunwest Assets and the bankruptcy 
estate to Applicant in exchange for, at their election: Applicant's 
common units or preferred units.\6\ Applicant in

[[Page 20444]]

turn contributed the property interests to Blackstone LLC. The terms of 
Applicant's common units and preferred units mirror the terms of the 
Rollover Equity Interests that are held by Applicant.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Applicant states that no Sunwest Investor was required to 
receive interests in Applicant; only Sunwest Investors who 
voluntarily elected to receive interests in Applicant became members 
of Applicant. In addition, Applicant states that neither the common 
interests nor class A preferred units that constitute the Rollover 
Equity Interests were over-subscribed, so certain over-subscription 
procedures developed in the Bankruptcy Case did not become 
applicable.
    \7\ Applicant also issued a third class of securities to certain 
founders of Sunwest (``Sunwest Founders'') that consists of 
contingent non-voting profits interests (``Profits Interests''). The 
Profits Interests entitle Sunwest Founders to receive a portion of 
Applicant's earnings if total distributions and payments to 
Sunwest's general unsecured creditors and Sunwest Investors (not 
including Sunwest Founders) aggregate in excess of $500 million. 
Applicant states that it is unlikely that the Profits Interests will 
ever have value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7. Applicant states that its assets consist exclusively of the 
Rollover Equity Interests and the following short-term instruments 
pending distributions to Applicant's members or disbursements in 
payment of Applicant's obligations: (a) General obligations of the 
United States, or its agencies and instrumentalities; and/or (b) 
deposit accounts with banks, which accounts are insured by the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation or an equivalent insuring organization 
(collectively, the ``Temporary Investments'').\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Applicant's sole source of revenue is and will continue to 
be its investment in Blackstone LLC (other than any income from 
Temporary Investments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    8. Applicant states that the District Court has been actively 
involved in all aspects of the Debtor's reorganization, including the 
development of Applicant's capital structure and the terms of the 
Blackstone Acquisition.\9\ In addition, committees of unsecured 
creditors and TIC Investors were established in 2009 to represent the 
interests of Sunwest Investors and creditors, and representatives of 
these committees considered and discussed numerous alternative methods 
of maximizing the value of Sunwest Investors' interests in Sunwest, 
including development of a stand-alone plan of reorganization and the 
acquisition of Sunwest properties by third parties. The Blackstone 
Acquisition was eventually determined to be the most favorable 
alternative available to Sunwest Investors and creditors. Applicant 
states that the negotiations which led to both the structure of 
Applicant and the terms of the PSA with Blackstone LLC were protracted, 
conducted at arm's-length, and actively participated in by Sunwest 
Investors and their representatives, counsel, investment bankers and 
other advisors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Applicant will continue to be subject to the jurisdiction of 
the District Court.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    9. The Blackstone LLC Agreement permits Blackstone LLC's board of 
directors to approve a proposal by BRE/SW Member LLC (a member of 
Blackstone LLC, ``BREA'') to request that its members, including 
Applicant, make additional capital contributions if BREA determines in 
good faith: (a) That Blackstone LLC requires additional capital to meet 
its financial obligations; or (b) that raising additional capital for 
additional investment purposes is advisable and in the best interests 
of Blackstone LLC; provided, however, such additional investments shall 
not include additional facilities unless they are contiguous or 
adjacent to ``properties'' (defined in the Blackstone LLC Agreement to 
include specified assisted living, memory care and skilled nursing 
facilities) existing as of the date of the Blackstone LLC Agreement. In 
addition, Applicant's limited liability company agreement permits 
Applicant to raise capital only for the purpose of paying Applicant's 
expenses or responding to a capital request from Blackstone LLC.\10\ 
Any offering by Applicant, whether to pay its expenses or to raise 
capital in response to a capital call from Blackstone LLC, must be 
conducted in compliance with federal and state securities laws.\11\ In 
any event, Applicant believes it is unlikely that Applicant or 
Blackstone LLC will request any additional capital.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Applicant does not anticipate that there will be 
significant distributions to Applicant in the initial years of 
operation of Blackstone LLC, but that Applicant will have 
significant administrative, compliance and similar expenses. 
Therefore, Blackstone LLC has agreed to reimburse Applicant $400,000 
each year, and the Debtor has agreed to loan Applicant up to a total 
of $2 million to permit Applicant to pay its expenses.
    \11\ Applicant states that, if it were to sell any additional 
securities, the securities would be sold to Applicant's members and 
not to third parties. Applicant states that an offering likely would 
be made only to accredited investors under Rule 506 of Regulation D 
under the Securities Act of 1933 and all members of Applicant 
received notice of such a possibility before electing to invest in 
Applicant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Applicant's Analysis

    1. Applicant requests an order of the Commission pursuant to 
sections 6(c) and 6(e) of the Act exempting it from all provisions of 
the Act and the rules thereunder, except sections 9, 17(a), 17(d) and 
17(e), Modified Section 31, and sections 36 through 53 of the Act and 
the rules thereunder. Applicant requests relief until the earlier of 
August 5, 2015 or such time as Applicant no longer meets the definition 
of an investment company under the Act.
    2. Applicant states that it meets the definition of an investment 
company, as defined in section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Act, because: (a) 
Applicant has acquired investment securities (i.e., interests in 
Blackstone LLC) having a value exceeding 40% of the value of 
Applicant's total assets; and (b) none of the exemptions or exceptions 
specified in the Act apply to Applicant in its current form. Applicant 
states that, if the Commission does not issue the requested relief, 
Applicant may be required to devote scarce financial and other 
resources to comply with provisions of the Act that Applicant argues 
are not relevant or necessary under Applicant's circumstances. 
Applicant also states that, although it was formed as a limited 
liability company rather than a liquidating trust, in terms of its 
structure and function, as well as the policies underlying the Act, 
Applicant is indistinguishable from liquidating trusts and other 
entities that have been granted similar exemptions by the Commission in 
the past.\12\ Applicant states that it is structured with the goal of 
liquidating the Sunwest Assets in an orderly manner and distributing 
the liquidation proceeds to its investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc., Investment Company Act 
Release Nos. 18643 (April 1, 1992) (notice) and 18675 (April 24, 
1992) (order) and LTV Aerospace Creditors Liquidating Trust, 
Investment Company Act Release Nos. 19596 (July 26, 1993) (notice) 
and 19648 (August 24, 1993) (order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Section 6(c) provides that the Commission may by order upon 
application exempt any person or persons, or any transaction or 
transactions, from any provision of the Act if such exemption is 
necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the 
protection of investors and the purposes of the Act. Section 6(e) 
provides that, in connection with any order exempting an investment 
company from any provision of section 7, certain provisions of the Act, 
as specified by the Commission, shall apply to the company and other 
persons dealing with the company as if such company were a registered 
investment company.
    4. Applicant states that it will be subject to all of section 31 
and the rules thereunder, except that rule 31a-1(a) will be modified to 
require retention of the documents that constitute the record forming 
the basis for the quarterly unaudited financial statements and the 
annual audited financial statements that Applicant will provide to its 
members, rather than the documents forming the

[[Page 20445]]

basis for the financial statements that would be filed pursuant to 
section 30 of the Act. Under the requested relief, Applicant will 
provide to its members: (i) Annual audited financial statements 
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles 
and rule 1-02(d) of Regulation S-X; and (ii) unaudited quarterly 
financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted 
accounting principles.
    5. Applicant contends that the following factors, among others, are 
appropriate grounds for the requested relief, particularly in view of 
the provisions of the Act that will apply to Applicant: (i) Sunwest 
Investors who were eligible to receive interests in Applicant, their 
counsel, investment bankers and other advisors, as well as the District 
Court and its appointed mediators, were active participants in 
designing and determining Applicant's structure; (ii) Applicant will 
continue to be subject to the jurisdiction of the District Court; (iii) 
transferability of Applicant's securities is severely restricted; \13\ 
(iv) Applicant has a limited life and will liquidate upon the 
liquidation of Blackstone LLC; and (v) Applicant will not be engaged in 
the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, and 
the only securities that Applicant may hold are its interests in 
Blackstone LLC and Temporary Investments pending distributions to 
Applicant's members or disbursements in payment of Applicant's 
obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Among other restrictions, Applicant states that it will 
limit transfers to transfers among members or affiliates of members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. Accordingly, Applicant believes that the issuance of the order 
pursuant to sections 6(c) and 6(e) is appropriate in the public 
interest, and consistent with the protection of investors and the 
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.

Applicant's Conditions

    Applicant agrees that any order of the Commission granting the 
requested relief will be subject to the following conditions:
    1. Applicant will not own or hold securities other than: (a) 
Interests in Blackstone LLC and (b) Temporary Investments.
    2. Applicant will not offer additional securities to its members, 
except in connection with capital requests from Blackstone LLC or to 
pay its expenses.
    3. If Applicant sells additional securities, such securities would 
be sold at a price equal to or greater than the net asset value of the 
securities at the time of the offering.
    4. Applicant's governing documents will not be amended to permit 
Applicant's securities to be freely tradable.
    5. Applicant will provide to its members: (a) Quarterly unaudited 
financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted 
accounting principles and (b) annual audited financial statements 
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles 
and rule 1-02(d) of Regulation S-X.
    6. Applicant will be exempt until the earlier of August 5, 2015 or 
such time as Applicant no longer meets the definition of an investment 
company under the Act.
    7. Applicant will not hold itself out as an investment company.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
under delegated authority.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8061 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.