Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews, 18861-18862 [2012-7345]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2012 / Notices
raised by the complaint or
complainant’s filing under section
210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.8(b)).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, Secretary to the
Commission, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2000. The public version of the
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has received a complaint
and a submission pursuant to section
210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure filed on behalf
of Pragmatus AV, LLC on March 13,
2012. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into
the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain consumer electronics, including
mobile phones and tablets. The
complaint names as respondents
ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. of Taiwan;
ASUS Computer International, Inc. of
CA; HTC Corporation of Taiwan; HTC
America, Inc. of WA; LG Electronics,
Inc. of South Korea; LG Electronics
U.S.A., Inc. of NJ; LG Electronics
MobileComm U.S.A, Inc. of CA; Pantech
Co., Ltd. of South Korea; Pantech
Wireless, Inc. of GA; Research In Motion
Ltd. of Canada; Research In Motion
Corp. of TX; Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd. of South Korea; Samsung
Electronics America, Inc. of NJ; and
Samsung Telecommunications America,
LLC of TX.
Proposed respondents, other
interested parties, and members of the
public are invited to file comments, not
to exceed five (5) pages in length,
inclusive of attachments, on any public
interest issues raised by the complaint
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Mar 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments
should address whether issuance of the
relief specifically requested by the
complainant in this investigation would
affect the public health and welfare in
the United States, competitive
conditions in the United States
economy, the production of like or
directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the requested
remedial orders are used in the United
States;
(ii) identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the requested remedial
orders;
(iii) identify like or directly
competitive articles that complainant,
its licensees, or third parties make in the
United States which could replace the
subject articles if they were to be
excluded;
(iv) indicate whether complainant,
complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to the requested
exclusion order and/or a cease and
desist order within a commercially
reasonable time; and
(v) explain how the requested
remedial orders would impact United
States consumers.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business, eight
calendar days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. There will be further
opportunities for comment on the
public interest after the issuance of any
final initial determination in this
investigation.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit 8 true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2885’’)
in a prominent place on the cover page
and/or the first page. (See Handbook for
Electronic Filing Procedures, https://
www.usitc.gov/secretary/
fed_reg_notices/rules/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding filing
should contact the Secretary (202–205–
2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18861
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary and on EDIS.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 13, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–7474 Filed 3–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679, 681,
and 682 (Third Review)]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India,
Japan, and Spain; Scheduling of
Expedited Five-Year Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on stainless steel bar from
Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: March 5, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nathanael Comly (202–205–3174),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
18862
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On March 5, 2012, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (76
FR 74807, December 1, 2011) of the
subject five-year reviews was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be
placed in the nonpublic record on May
8, 2012, and made available to persons
on the Administrative Protective Order
service list for these reviews. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determinations
the Commission should reach in the
reviews. Comments are due on or before
May 11, 2012 and may not contain new
factual information. Any person that is
neither a party to the five-year reviews
nor an interested party may submit a
brief written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the reviews by May 11,
2012. However, should the Department
of Commerce extend the time limit for
its completion of the final results of its
reviews, the deadline for comments
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by domestic producers Carpenter
Technology Corporation, Crucible Industries, LLC,
Electralloy a G.O. Carlson Inc. Co., Universal
Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna
Slater Stainless, Inc. to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Mar 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. Please be aware that the
Commission’s rules with respect to
electronic filing have been amended.
The amendments took effect on
November 7, 2011. See 76 FR 61937
(Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly revised
Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing,
available on the Commission’s Web site
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the reviews must be
served on all other parties to the reviews
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined to exercise its authority to
extend the reviews period by up to 90
days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 22, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
The Commission published notice of
institution of the investigation in the
Federal Register on May 24, 2011 (76
FR 30195). In its original notice of
investigation, the Commission indicated
that it would transmit its report to the
Committee on March 26, 2012. The
notice is also available on the
Commission Web site at https://
www.usitc.gov. All other information
about the investigation, including a
description of the subject matter to be
addressed, contact information, and
Commission addresses, remains the
same as in the original notice. The
public record for this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 23, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–7472 Filed 3–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
[Docket No. 10–54]
Zhiwei Lin, M.D.; Decision and Order
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 332–524]
Brazil: Competitive Factors Affecting
U.S. and Brazilian Agricultural Sales in
Selected Third Country Markets
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Extension of date for
transmitting report.
AGENCY:
Following the receipt of a
letter on March 22, 2012, from the
Committee on Finance of the United
States Senate (Committee), the
Commission has extended to April 26,
2012, the date for transmitting its report
to the Committee in investigation No.
332–524, Brazil: Competitive Factors In
Brazil Affecting U.S. and Brazilian
Agricultural Sales in Selected Third
Country Markets.
SUMMARY:
Fmt 4703
Backround
Drug Enforcement Administration
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Frm 00077
March 22, 2012: Receipt of the letter
from the Committee.
April 26, 2012: New date for
transmitting the Commission’s report to
the Committee.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[FR Doc. 2012–7345 Filed 3–27–12; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
DATES:
Sfmt 4703
On September 19, 2011,
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
Timothy D. Wing issued the attached
recommended decision (also ALJ).
Therein, the ALJ found that Respondent
is currently without authority to
dispense controlled substances in
California, the State in which he
practices medicine and holds his DEA
Registration and therefore
recommended that his registration be
revoked. Thereafter, Respondent filed
two motions 1 and the Government filed
a response to the motions. Having
reviewed the record in its entirety
including the ALJ’s recommended
decision and the various pleadings, I
have decided to adopt the ALJ’s rulings,
findings of fact, conclusions of law, and
1 The motions were titled ‘‘Motion for
Reconsideration—Opposition for Summary
Disposition’’ and ‘‘Amended Motion for
Reconsideration—Exceptions to Order of Summary
Disposition.’’
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18861-18862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7345]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-678, 679, 681, and 682 (Third Review)]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain;
Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of
expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation
of the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil,
India, Japan, and Spain would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For
further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part
207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: March 5, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathanael Comly (202-205-3174), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special
[[Page 18862]]
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On March 5, 2012, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(76 FR 74807, December 1, 2011) of the subject five-year reviews was
adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that
would warrant conducting full reviews.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section
751(c)(3) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on
May 8, 2012, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will
be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission's rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determinations the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are
due on or before May 11, 2012 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement
(which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the
reviews by May 11, 2012. However, should the Department of Commerce
extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its
reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce's final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business
proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements
of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. Please
be aware that the Commission's rules with respect to electronic filing
have been amended. The amendments took effect on November 7, 2011. See
76 FR 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly revised Commission's Handbook
on E-Filing, available on the Commission's Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by domestic
producers Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible Industries,
LLC, Electralloy a G.O. Carlson Inc. Co., Universal Stainless &
Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc. to be
individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will
not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination.--The Commission has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the reviews period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 22, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-7345 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P