Roseburg Forest Products, Composite Panels Division, Missoula, MT; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 17524 [2012-7159]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 17524 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until May 25, 2012. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Lynn Langton, Statistician, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice, 810 7th Street NW., Washington, DC 20531, or facsimile (202) 616–1351. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of this information: (1) Type of information collection: Extension of a currently approved collection. (2) Title of the form/collection: National Crime Victimization Survey. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the department sponsoring the collection: NCVS. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:32 Mar 23, 2012 Jkt 226001 abstract. Primary: Persons 12 years or older living in NCVS sampled households located throughout the United States. The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) collects, analyzes, publishes, and disseminates statistics on the criminal victimization in the U.S. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: An estimate of the total number of respondents is 84,700. It will take the average interviewed respondent an estimated 23 minutes to respond, the average non-interviewed respondent an estimated 7 minutes to respond, the estimated average follow-up interview is 12 minutes, and the estimated average follow-up for a non-interview is 1 minute. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: The total respondent burden is approximately 67,657 hours. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 2E–508, Washington, DC 20530. Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2012–7171 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P was based on the findings that worker separations were not attributable to increased imports by the subject firm or its declining customers of articles like or directly competitive with particleboard or a shift/acquisition of these articles to/ from a foreign country by the workers’ firm. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner supplied additional information regarding possible import competition. The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements to apply for TAA. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of March 2012. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2012–7159 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR [TA–W–80,502; TA–W–80,502A] Employment and Training Administration Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance [TA–W–80,459] Roseburg Forest Products, Composite Panels Division, Missoula, MT; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated February 29, 2012, a company official requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Roseburg Forest Products, Composite Panels Division, Missoula, Montana (subject facility). The Notice of Determination was issued on February 2, 2012 and published in the Federal Register on February 21, 2012 (77 FR 9973). The workers engage in activities related to the production of particleboard. The initial determination PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 TA–W–80,502 Lexis Nexis, Quality & Metrics Department, Including Employees Located Throughout the United States Who Report to Miamisburg, OH TA–W–80,502A Lexis Nexis, Quality & Metrics Department, Including Employees Located Throughout the United States Who Report To Colorado Springs, CO In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 3, 2012, applicable to workers of Lexis Nexis, Quality & Metrics Division, Miamisburg, Ohio. The workers are engaged in E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7159]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-80,459]


Roseburg Forest Products, Composite Panels Division, Missoula, 
MT; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for 
Reconsideration

    By application dated February 29, 2012, a company official 
requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination 
regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance 
(TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Roseburg Forest 
Products, Composite Panels Division, Missoula, Montana (subject 
facility). The Notice of Determination was issued on February 2, 2012 
and published in the Federal Register on February 21, 2012 (77 FR 
9973).
    The workers engage in activities related to the production of 
particleboard. The initial determination was based on the findings that 
worker separations were not attributable to increased imports by the 
subject firm or its declining customers of articles like or directly 
competitive with particleboard or a shift/acquisition of these articles 
to/from a foreign country by the workers' firm.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner supplied 
additional information regarding possible import competition.
    The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements to apply for TAA.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of March 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-7159 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P