Roseburg Forest Products, Composite Panels Division, Missoula, MT; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 17524 [2012-7159]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17524
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of
Justice Statistics will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
information collection is published to
obtain comments from the public and
affected agencies. Comments are
encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until May 25, 2012. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Lynn Langton,
Statistician, Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Office of Justice Programs, Department
of Justice, 810 7th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20531, or facsimile
(202) 616–1351.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of this information:
(1) Type of information collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the form/collection:
National Crime Victimization Survey.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
department sponsoring the collection:
NCVS.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:32 Mar 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
abstract. Primary: Persons 12 years or
older living in NCVS sampled
households located throughout the
United States. The National Crime
Victimization Survey (NCVS) collects,
analyzes, publishes, and disseminates
statistics on the criminal victimization
in the U.S.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: An estimate of the total
number of respondents is 84,700. It will
take the average interviewed respondent
an estimated 23 minutes to respond, the
average non-interviewed respondent an
estimated 7 minutes to respond, the
estimated average follow-up interview is
12 minutes, and the estimated average
follow-up for a non-interview is
1 minute.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The total respondent burden
is approximately 67,657 hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 2E–508,
Washington, DC 20530.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012–7171 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
was based on the findings that worker
separations were not attributable to
increased imports by the subject firm or
its declining customers of articles like or
directly competitive with particleboard
or a shift/acquisition of these articles to/
from a foreign country by the workers’
firm.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner supplied additional
information regarding possible import
competition.
The Department of Labor has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements to apply for
TAA.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of
March 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–7159 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA–W–80,502; TA–W–80,502A]
Employment and Training
Administration
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
[TA–W–80,459]
Roseburg Forest Products, Composite
Panels Division, Missoula, MT; Notice
of Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated February 29,
2012, a company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of Roseburg Forest Products,
Composite Panels Division, Missoula,
Montana (subject facility). The Notice of
Determination was issued on February
2, 2012 and published in the Federal
Register on February 21, 2012 (77 FR
9973).
The workers engage in activities
related to the production of
particleboard. The initial determination
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TA–W–80,502
Lexis Nexis, Quality & Metrics
Department, Including Employees
Located Throughout the United
States Who Report to Miamisburg,
OH
TA–W–80,502A
Lexis Nexis, Quality & Metrics
Department, Including Employees
Located Throughout the United
States Who Report To Colorado
Springs, CO
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
(19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of
Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility
to Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on February 3, 2012,
applicable to workers of Lexis Nexis,
Quality & Metrics Division, Miamisburg,
Ohio. The workers are engaged in
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7159]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-80,459]
Roseburg Forest Products, Composite Panels Division, Missoula,
MT; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated February 29, 2012, a company official
requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination
regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Roseburg Forest
Products, Composite Panels Division, Missoula, Montana (subject
facility). The Notice of Determination was issued on February 2, 2012
and published in the Federal Register on February 21, 2012 (77 FR
9973).
The workers engage in activities related to the production of
particleboard. The initial determination was based on the findings that
worker separations were not attributable to increased imports by the
subject firm or its declining customers of articles like or directly
competitive with particleboard or a shift/acquisition of these articles
to/from a foreign country by the workers' firm.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner supplied
additional information regarding possible import competition.
The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
workers meet the eligibility requirements to apply for TAA.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of March 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-7159 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
