Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks From the People's Republic of China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 12811-12812 [2012-4872]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2012 / Notices
rescinded, Shantou Yuexing Enterprise
Company, the Department intends to
assess antidumping duties at rates equal
to the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(2), if the review is
rescinded for this company in the final
results.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Regal, the
cash deposit rate will be that established
in the final results of this review,
except, if the rate is zero or de minimis,
no cash deposit will be required; (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non-PRC exporters not listed above
that have separate rates, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise, which
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC-wide rate of 112.81 percent;
and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of
subject merchandise, which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the
PRC exporters that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This administrative review and this
notice are in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: February 24, 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–5028 Filed 3–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Mar 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–941]
Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving
and Racks From the People’s Republic
of China: Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: March 2, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katie Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington DC 20230; (202) 482–7906.
Background
On October 31, 2011, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published
a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
kitchen appliance shelving and racks
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’) covering the period September
1, 2010, through August 31, 2011. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 76 FR 67133 (October 31, 2011).
On January 10, 2012, SSW Holding
Company, Inc. and Nashville Wire
Products, Inc, (‘‘Petitioners’’) withdrew
their request for an administrative
review of Hangzhou Dunli Import &
Export Co.; Ltd. (‘‘Hangzhou Dunli’’).
Additionally, on January 30, 2012,
Petitioners withdrew their request for a
review of Guangdong Wireking Co. Ltd.
(‘‘Wireking’’). Petitioners were the only
party to request a review of these
companies.
Partial Rescission
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if a party
who requested the review withdraws
the request within 90 days of the date
of publication of notice of initiation of
the requested review. Petitioners’
request was submitted within the 90 day
period and, thus, is timely. Because
Petitioners’ withdrawal of requests for
review is timely and because no other
party requested a review of the
aforementioned companies, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
we are partially rescinding this review
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12811
with respect to Hangzhou Dunli and
Wireking.1
Assessment Rates
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Both Hangzhou
Dunli and Wireking have a separate rate
from a prior segment of this proceeding;
therefore, antidumping duties shall be
assessed at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(2). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers for whom this review is
being rescinded, as of the publication
date of this notice, of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(0(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
1 We note that there are additional companies for
which all review requests were withdrawn within
the 90 day period. See Letter to the Department
from Petitioners, Re: Withdrawal of Requests for
Second Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order—Kitchen Appliance Shelving and
Racks from the People’s Republic of China, dated
January 10, 2012; and Letter to the Department from
Petitioners, Re: Withdrawal of Requests for Second
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order—Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks
from the People’s Republic of China, dated January
30, 2012. These additional companies for which all
review requests were withdrawn do not have a
separate rate from a prior segment of this
proceeding. We intend to address the disposition of
these companies in the preliminary results of this
review.
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
12812
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2012 / Notices
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: February 17, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–4872 Filed 3–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–974]
Steel Wheels From the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of
Preliminary Affirmative Determination
of Critical Circumstances
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) has preliminarily
determined that critical circumstances
exist with respect to imports of steel
wheels from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC).
DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Copyak or Eric Greynolds, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Room 4014, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–2209
and 202–482–6071, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Case History
On March 30, 2011, the Department
received a countervailing duty (CVD)
petition concerning imports of steel
wheels from the PRC filed in proper
form by Accuride Corporation
(Accuride) and Hayes Lemmerz
International, Inc. (collectively,
petitioners).1 This investigation was
initiated on April 19, 2011.2 The
1 See Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing
Duties (Petition). A public version of the Petition
and all other public documents and public versions
of business proprietary documents for this
investigation are available on the public file in the
Central Records Unit (CRU), Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building.
2 See Certain Steel Wheels From the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty
Investigation, 76 FR 23302 (April 26, 2011)
(Initiation Notice), and accompanying Initiation
Checklist.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Mar 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
affirmative preliminary determination
was published on September 6, 2011.3
On September 1, 2011, petitioners
alleged that critical circumstances exist
with respect to imports of steel wheels
from the PRC and submitted U.S.
Census Data in support of their
allegation at Exhibit I.4 On September 9,
2011, the Department requested from
the three mandatory respondents—the
Jingu Companies,5 the Xingmin
Companies,6 and the Centurion
Xingmin Companies 7—monthly
shipment data of subject merchandise to
the United States for the period October
2010 through June 2011.
On September 21, 2011, the Xingmin
Companies submitted to the Department
their monthly shipment data of subject
merchandise to the United States for the
period October 2010 through June
2011.8 At verification, the Xingmin
Companies provided some minor
corrections to these data.9 On
September 25, 2011, the Jingu
Companies submitted to the Department
their monthly shipment data of subject
merchandise to the United States for the
period October 2010 through June
2011.10 At verification, the Jingu
Companies provided some minor
corrections to these data.11 On
September 26, 2011, the Centurion
Companies submitted to the Department
their monthly shipment data of subject
merchandise to the United States for the
3 See Certain Steel Wheels From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment
With Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 76 FR
55012 (September 6, 2011) (Preliminary
Determination).
4 See Petitioners’ Critical Circumstances
Allegation (September 1, 2011).
5 The Jingu Companies are Zhejiang Jingu
Company Limited (Zhejiang Jingu), Chengdu Jingu
Wheel Co., Ltd. (Chengdu Jingu), Shanghai Yata
Industrial Co. Ltd. (Shanghai Yata), and Zhejiang
Wheel World Industrial Co., Ltd. (Wheel World).
6 The Xingmin Companies are Shandong Xingmin
Wheel Co. Ltd. (Xingmin) and Sino-tex (Longkou)
Wheel Manufacturers, Inc. (Sino-tex).
7 The Centurion Companies are Jining Centurion
Wheels Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Jining Centurion)
and Jining CII Wheel Manufacture Co., Ltd. (Jining
CII).
8 See the Xingmin Companies’ third supplemental
questionnaire response titled ‘‘Steel Wheels from
China: Third Supplemental Questionnaire
Response’’ (September 21, 2010) at Exhibit I.
9 See the Department’s January 6, 2012,
verification report titled ‘‘Verification Report of
Xingmin Wheel Co. Ltd’’ at 2 (filed on IA ACCESS
on January 10, 2012).
10 See the Jingu Companies’ third supplemental
questionnaire response titled ‘‘CVD Investigation of
Steel Wheels from China: Critical Circumstances
Shipment Data’’ (filed on IA ACCESS on September
25, 2011, and dated September 26, 2011) at Exhibit
I.
11 See the Department’s January 31, 2012,
verification report titled ‘‘Verification Report
Regarding Information Submitted by Zhejiang Jingu
Company Limited’’ at 2 and 5–6.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
period October 2010 through June
2011.12
Period of Investigation
The period for which we are
measuring subsidies, or the period of
investigation (POI), is calendar year
2010.
Scope of Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are steel wheels with a
wheel diameter of 18 to 24.5 inches.
Rims and discs for such wheels are
included, whether imported as an
assembly or separately. These products
are used with both tubed and tubeless
tires. Steel wheels, whether or not
attached to tires or axles, are included.
However, if the steel wheels are
imported as an assembly attached to
tires or axles, the tire or axle is not
covered by the scope. The scope
includes steel wheels, discs, and rims of
carbon and/or alloy composition and
clad wheels, discs, and rims when
carbon or alloy steel represents more
than fifty percent of the product by
weight. The scope includes wheels,
rims, and discs, whether coated or
uncoated, regardless of the type of
coating.
Imports of the subject merchandise
are provided for under the following
categories of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
8708.70.05.00, 8708.70.25.00,
8708.70.45.30, and 8708.70.60.30.
Imports of the subject merchandise may
also enter under the following categories
of the HTSUS: 8406.90.4580,
8406.90.7500, 8420.99.9000,
8422.90.1100, 8422.90.2100,
8422.90.9120, 8422.90.9130,
8422.90.9160, 8422.90.9195,
8431.10.0010, 8431.10.0090,
8431.20.0000, 8431.31.0020,
8431.31.0040, 8431.31.0060,
8431.39.0010, 8431.39.0050,
8431.39.0070, 8431.39.0080,
8431.43.8060, 8431.49.1010,
8431.49.1060, 8431.49.1090,
8431.49.9030, 8431.49.9040,
8431.49.9085, 8432.90.0005,
8432.90.0015, 8432.90.0030,
8432.90.0080, 8433.90.1000,
8433.90.5020, 8433.90.5040,
8436.99.0020, 8436.99.0090,
8479.90.9440, 8479.90.9450,
8479.90.9496, 8487.90.0080,
8607.19.1200, 8607.19.1500,
8708.70.1500, 8708.70.3500,
8708.70.4560, 8708.70.6060,
8709.90.0000, 8710.00.0090,
12 See the Centurion Companies’ third
supplemental questionnaire response titled ‘‘CVD
Investigation of Steel Wheels from China: Critical
Circumstances Shipment Data’’ (dated September
26, 2010) at Exhibit I.
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12811-12812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4872]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-941]
Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks From the People's
Republic of China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington DC 20230; (202) 482-7906.
Background
On October 31, 2011, the Department of Commerce (``Department'')
published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain kitchen appliance shelving and racks
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') covering the period
September 1, 2010, through August 31, 2011. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request
for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 67133 (October 31, 2011).
On January 10, 2012, SSW Holding Company, Inc. and Nashville Wire
Products, Inc, (``Petitioners'') withdrew their request for an
administrative review of Hangzhou Dunli Import & Export Co.; Ltd.
(``Hangzhou Dunli''). Additionally, on January 30, 2012, Petitioners
withdrew their request for a review of Guangdong Wireking Co. Ltd.
(``Wireking''). Petitioners were the only party to request a review of
these companies.
Partial Rescission
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the requested review.
Petitioners' request was submitted within the 90 day period and, thus,
is timely. Because Petitioners' withdrawal of requests for review is
timely and because no other party requested a review of the
aforementioned companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we
are partially rescinding this review with respect to Hangzhou Dunli and
Wireking.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We note that there are additional companies for which all
review requests were withdrawn within the 90 day period. See Letter
to the Department from Petitioners, Re: Withdrawal of Requests for
Second Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order--Kitchen
Appliance Shelving and Racks from the People's Republic of China,
dated January 10, 2012; and Letter to the Department from
Petitioners, Re: Withdrawal of Requests for Second Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order--Kitchen Appliance Shelving and
Racks from the People's Republic of China, dated January 30, 2012.
These additional companies for which all review requests were
withdrawn do not have a separate rate from a prior segment of this
proceeding. We intend to address the disposition of these companies
in the preliminary results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Both
Hangzhou Dunli and Wireking have a separate rate from a prior segment
of this proceeding; therefore, antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15
days after publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers for whom this
review is being rescinded, as of the publication date of this notice,
of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(0(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
[[Page 12812]]
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: February 17, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-4872 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
