Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Amending the Definition of Approved Person To Exclude Foreign Affiliates, Eliminating the Application Process for Approved Persons, and Making Related Technical and Conforming Changes, 12626-12629 [2012-4911]

Download as PDF 12626 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / Notices with routing both Customer and Professional orders to away markets. The Exchange believes that these fees will assist it in recouping costs the Exchange incurs by utilizing NOS, in maintaining membership fees at away markets and technical expenses associated with the routing process. The proposed fees also continue to recoup transaction fees assessed by the respective away market, which vary, and standard clearing charges for each transaction, which fees are incurred by the Exchange when routing to away markets. The Exchange also believes that the proposed Routing Fees are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the fees would be uniformly applied to all Customers and Professionals. The Exchange’s proposed fees are calculated to distribute the costs associated with routing among the various away markets. The Exchange determined not to amend the Customer and Professional Routing Fees when routing orders in MNX and NDX to NOM at this time because the Exchange determined that in light of other fees, the current fees for routing to NOM in MNX and NDX are currently within the range of fees that are proposed for other away markets. The Exchange does not believe that it is necessary at this time to assess additional fees to route to NOM in MNX and NDX above the current $.56 per contract fee assessed for Customer and Professional orders today. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.8 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:25 Feb 29, 2012 Jkt 226001 or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.9 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– Phlx–2012–19 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–Phlx–2012–19. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–Phlx–2012– 19 and should be submitted on or before March 22, 2012. PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2012–4910 Filed 2–29–12; 8:45 am] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–66462; File No. SR–NYSE– 2012–06] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Amending the Definition of Approved Person To Exclude Foreign Affiliates, Eliminating the Application Process for Approved Persons, and Making Related Technical and Conforming Changes February 24, 2012. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on February 14, 2012, New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the definition of approved person to exclude foreign affiliates, eliminate the application process for approved persons, and make related technical and conforming changes. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the Commission’s Public Reference Room, and www.nyse.com. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C.78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / Notices of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend the definition of approved person to exclude foreign affiliates, eliminate the application process for approved persons, and make related technical and conforming changes. Following approval of the proposed rule change, the Exchange will advise member organizations of the implementation date of the rule change via Information Memo. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background The current rules governing the definition of and application process for an approved person are NYSE Rules 2 and 304. If the definition requirements under NYSE Rule 2 are met, then the person or entity has to apply to the Exchange for approval to register as an approved person. This requirement is intended to bring certain affiliates of Exchange member organizations within the Exchange’s jurisdiction and to subject such affiliates’ activities to Exchange rules to the extent their activities are related to the activities of the member organization. NYSE Rule 2(c) defines the term ‘‘approved person’’ as ‘‘a person, other than a member, principal executive or employee of a member organization, who controls a member organization or is engaged in a securities or kindred business that is controlled by or under common control with a member or member organization who has been approved by the Exchange as an approved person.’’ NYSE Rule 2(d) further defines ‘‘person’’ to include not only natural persons, but also corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, associations and other organized groups of persons. NYSE Rule 2(e) defines the term ‘‘control’’ to mean the power to direct or cause the direction of management or policies, whether through ownership of securities, by contract or otherwise, and creates a rebuttable presumption of control if the person has a right to vote 25 percent or more of the voting securities, is entitled to receive 25 percent or more of the net profits, or is a director, general partner, or principal executive of the member organization. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:25 Feb 29, 2012 Jkt 226001 NYSE Rule 2(f) defines ‘‘engage in a securities or kindred business’’ to mean transacting business as a broker or dealer in securities. Thus, the current definition of approved person includes a foreign affiliate of a member organization that is engaged in a brokerdealer business, but does not include, for example, a registered investment company. NYSE Rules 2A(e) and (f) further provide that the Exchange has jurisdiction after notice and a hearing to discipline approved persons in connection with the member organization’s business and has jurisdiction over any and all other functions of approved persons in connection with the member organization’s business in order for the Exchange to comply with its statutory obligation as a self-regulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’). NYSE Rules 304 and 311(a) require, with limited exceptions, that persons who meet the NYSE Rule 2(c) definition of an approved person must apply for approval by the Exchange as an approved person. NYSE Rule 304 further provides that no person may become or remain an approved person unless such person meets the standards prescribed in the Exchange’s rules, and it prescribes the process that an applicant must follow to become an approved person. Among other things, this process involves submission to the Exchange of a completed Form AP–1 (in the case of a corporation or other legal entity) or Forms AD–G 2 and AD–G 3 (in the case of a natural person, collectively referred to as ‘‘AD–G’’), and other pertinent information regarding the candidate for approval. By executing the Form AP–1 or AD–G, as applicable, the approved person affirmatively consents to the Exchange’s jurisdiction. Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the definition of approved person in NYSE Rule 2 to revise the definition of which entities are deemed to be under ‘‘common control’’ with a member organization. The Exchange believes that the current definition, which includes certain foreign affiliates, is overbroad and it is unnecessary to assert jurisdiction over a foreign affiliate of a member organization that does not control a member organization. The Exchange notes that excluding such foreign affiliates from its jurisdiction would be consistent with Rule 19g2–1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), which provides that an exchange is not required to enforce compliance with its PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12627 rules against certain persons 4; the Exchange has not identified a rule of any other SRO that asserts jurisdiction over a foreign affiliate under common control with a member of that SRO. As such, the Exchange proposes to amend the definition of approved person so that it would include any person, other than a member, principal executive or employee of a member organization, who controls a member organization, is engaged in a securities or kindred business that is controlled by a member or member organization, or is a U.S. registered broker-dealer under common control with a member organization. By changing the definition of approved person to exclude certain foreign affiliates, the Exchange does not intend to eliminate certain controls in Exchange rules related to potential conflicts of interest associated with having a foreign affiliate under common control with a member organization. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes several amendments to its Rules. First, the Exchange proposes to amend paragraphs (3) and (4) of NYSE Rule 21 to provide that a member of the Exchange’s Board of Directors or an authorized committee who is associated with a member organization cannot participate in the deliberations concerning the listing of a security if the Director knows that an affiliate of the member organization directly or indirectly owns one percent or more of any class of stock of the issuer or has a contract, option, or privilege to purchase the security to be listed. Second, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 22 to provide that a member of certain NYSE boards and committees may not participate in the consideration of any matter if there are certain types of indebtedness between the board or committee member and a member organization’s affiliate or other 4 See 17 CFR 240.19g2–1. Under Rule 19g2–1, a national securities exchange is not required to enforce compliance, within the meaning of Section 19(g) of the Act, with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, to [sic] with respect to persons associated with a member, other than securities persons or persons who control a member. Under Rule 19g2–1(b)(1), a ‘‘securities person’’ is defined as a ‘‘person who is a general partner or officer (or person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions) or employee of a member; provided, however, that a registered broker or dealer which controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the member and the general partners and officers (and persons occupying similar status or performing similar functions) and employees of such a registered broker or dealer shall be securities persons if they effect, directly or indirectly, transactions in securities through the member by use of facilities maintained or supervised by such exchange or association.’’ A foreign broker-dealer not registered in the United States that is under common control with an NYSE member organization falls outside of the definition of ‘‘securities person.’’ E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1 12628 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES related parties. Third, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 98A, which provides that no issuer, or partner or subsidiary thereof, may become an approved person of a Designated Market Maker (‘‘DMM’’) unit that is registered in the stock of that issuer, to provide instead that a DMM unit may not be registered in a stock of an issuer, or a partner or subsidiary thereof, if such entity is either an approved person or an affiliate of the DMM unit’s member organization. Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend Supplementary Material .30(c) of Rule 402 to provide that when securities are callable in part under the Rule, a member organization may not allocate any called securities to the account of an affiliate until all customer positions have been satisfied.5 The Exchange also proposes to amend its rules to remove the requirement that the Exchange affirmatively approve each application to become an approved person. If a person meets the definition of an approved person, as proposed, the Exchange will obtain jurisdiction by consent as described below. The Exchange believes that the current application process requires the submission of a substantial amount of information and documents related to member organization affiliates that is unnecessary to carry out the Exchange’s regulatory responsibilities. In particular, because the Exchange is no longer the Designated Examining Authority (‘‘DEA’’) for Exchange member organizations,6 the Exchange does not believe that it needs to engage in a detailed financial review of approved persons of its member organization applicants. The Exchange further notes that other SROs do not require that such persons undergo such an application and approval process.7 The Exchange, 5 The Exchange does not believe any amendment to NYSE Rules 22, 91, 96, 112, 422, 410A, 460, or 1301 is necessary as a result of the proposed rule change; the Exchange believes such Rules would continue to be consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the manner in which such they address potential conflicts of interest is appropriate under the circumstances. 6 Prospective member organization applicants must be either a member of FINRA or, if the applicant does not transact business with public customers or conduct business on the Floor of the Exchange, a member of another registered securities exchange, before being approved as an Exchange member organization. See NYSE Rule 2(b)(i). Generally, FINRA or the other exchange already is, or will be, designated as the DEA under SEC Rule 17d–1 and the Exchange will not be designated as such. Currently, the Exchange is not the DEA for any of its member organizations, but if it were designated as the DEA, the Exchange has retained FINRA to perform services related to meeting the Exchange’s DEA responsibilities for a member organization. 7 For example, the rules of FINRA and The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. do not impose VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:25 Feb 29, 2012 Jkt 226001 therefore, proposes to remove all references to an approval process and the submission of an application for such approval from NYSE Rules 304, 308, and 311. The Exchange also would eliminate use of the Forms AP–1 and AD–G. Nevertheless, the Exchange’s jurisdiction over approved persons in accordance with the revised definition would remain. Thus, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 304 to provide specifically that a member organization would be required to identify all of its approved persons to the Exchange and each such approved person would continue to be required to consent to the Exchange’s jurisdiction. Specifically, an approved person would continue to have to agree to (i) inform the Exchange of any statutory disqualification of the approved person under Section 3(a)(39) of the Act, (ii) abide by the Rules of the Exchange relating to approved persons, and (iii) permit examination by the Exchange, or any person designated by it, of its books and records to verify the accuracy of the information required to be supplied under Exchange Rules.8 The focus on identification of approved persons by each member organization and consent to jurisdiction by each approved person, instead of review and approval of applications by the Exchange, would make the entire process more efficient while maintaining appropriate regulatory standards. The proposed rule change would remove unnecessary paperwork in the process while holding each member organization accountable for identifying to the Exchange its affiliates and approved persons. The remaining jurisdictional requirements for approved persons would enable the Exchange to continue to pursue matters involving or affecting its member organizations.9 application and approval requirements on member affiliates. See also note 9, infra. 8 The Exchange proposes to eliminate the text in current Rule 304(e)(1), which requires an approved person to supply information concerning its relationship with the member organization. This provision relates to information required to be submitted on Form AP–1 or AD–G, and as such it is not necessary to retain it in proposed Rule 304. 9 The Exchange notes that FINRA is in the process of harmonizing legacy NASD and NYSE Rules, and has published a proposal to harmonize membership rules. See FINRA Regulatory Notice 10–01. While FINRA has proposed that a member firm be required to provide certain information about affiliates, FINRA has not proposed to adopt the approved person definition or application process, or assert jurisdiction over such persons. When FINRA completes that harmonization process for the membership rules, the Exchange will consider whether further amendments to its approved person rules are advisable. Until such time, the Exchange believes that the narrowing of the approved person definition and the elimination of the approved PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Exchange also proposes to make technical and conforming changes to other rules. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 476A, which addresses minor rule violations, to correct a citation to Rule 304. The Exchange further proposes to make technical amendments to replace the term ‘‘allied member’’ with ‘‘principal executive’’ in Rules 21, 22, 91, 96, 112, 308, 410A, 422, 460, and 1301 and NYSE Rule Interpretation for Rule 304, delete ‘‘allied member’’ from Rule 304A, and delete NYSE Rule Interpretation for Rule 304A entirely; the Exchange replaced the term ‘‘allied member’’ with the term ‘‘principal executive’’ in an earlier rule filing and the proposed amendments are consistent with the previous rule filing.10 2. Statutory Basis The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) 11 of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) 12 in particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. More specifically, the NYSE believes that the proposed approved person definition and consent to jurisdiction process would remove unnecessary complexities and excessive informational requirements and create a more efficient and less burdensome process for membership applicants and member organizations while maintaining appropriate regulatory standards. As such, the proposed rule change would contribute to removing impediments to and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not person application process will remove unnecessary complexities and excessive informational requirements and thereby reduce burdens on membership applicants and member organizations while still maintaining high regulatory standards consistent with the Act. 10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58549 (September 15, 2008), 73 FR 54444 (September 19, 2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–80). 11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / Notices necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–NYSE–2012–06 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–2012–06. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:25 Feb 29, 2012 Jkt 226001 communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the NYSE’s principal office and on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSE– 2012–06 and should be submitted on or before March 22, 2012. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.13 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–4911 Filed 2–29–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–66464; File Nos. SR–NYSE– 2011–55; SR–NYSEAmex–2011–84] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Filing of Partial Amendment No. 2 to Proposed Rule Changes, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Adopting New Rule 107C To Establish a Retail Liquidity Program on a Pilot Basis To Attract Additional Retail Order Flow to the Exchanges February 24, 2012. I. Introduction On October 19, 2011, New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) and NYSE Amex LLC (‘‘NYSE Amex’’ and together with NYSE, the ‘‘Exchanges’’) each filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to establish a Retail Liquidity Program (‘‘Program’’) on a pilot basis for a period of one year from the date of implementation, if approved. The 13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12629 proposed rule changes were published for comment in the Federal Register on November 9, 2011.3 The Commission received 28 comments on the NYSE proposal 4 and 4 comments on the NYSE Amex proposal.5 On December 19, 2011, the Commission designated a longer period for Commission action on the proposed rule change, until February 7, 2012.6 In connection with the proposals, the Exchanges requested exemptive relief from Rule 612(c) of Regulation NMS,7 which prohibits a national securities exchange from accepting or ranking certain orders based on an increment smaller than the minimum pricing 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 65671 (November 2, 2011), 76 FR 69774 (SR–NYSEAmex– 2011–84); 65672 (November 2, 2011), 76 FR 69788 (SR–NYSE–2011–55). 4 See Letters to the Commission from Sal Arnuk, Joe Saluzzi and Paul Zajac, Themis Trading LLC, dated October 17, 2011 (‘‘Themis Letter’’); Garret Cook, dated November 4, 2011 (‘‘Cook Letter’’); James Johannes, dated November 27, 2011 (‘‘Johannes Letter’’); Ken Voorhies, dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Voorhies Letter’’); William Wuepper, dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Wuepper Letter’’); A. Joseph, dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Joseph Letter’’); Leonard Amoruso, General Counsel, Knight Capital, Inc., dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Knight Letter’’); Kevin Basic, dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Basic Letter’’); J. Fournier, dated November 28, 2011 (Fournier Letter’’); Ullrich Fischer, CTO, PairCo, dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘PairCo Letter’’); James Angel, Associate Professor of Finance, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, dated November 28, 2011 (‘‘Angel Letter’’); Jordan Wollin, dated November 29, 2011 (‘‘Wollin Letter’’); Aaron Schafter, President, Great Mountain Capital Management LLC, dated November 29, 2011 (‘‘Great Mountain Capital Letter’’); Wayne Koch, Trader, Bright Trading, dated November 29, 2011 (‘‘Koch Letter’’); Kurt Schact, CFA, Managing Director, and James Allen, CFA, Head, Capital Markets Policy, CFA Institute, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘CFA Letter’’); David Green, Bright Trading, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Green Letter’’); Robert Bright, Chief Executive Officer, and Dennis Dick, CFA, Market Structure Consultant, Bright Trading LLC, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Bright Trading Letter’’); Bodil Jelsness, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Jelsness Letter’’); Christopher Nagy, Managing Director, Order Routing and Market Data Strategy, TD Ameritrade, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘TD Ameritrade Letter’’); Laura Kenney, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Kenney Letter’’); Suhas Daftuar, Hudson River Trading LLC, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Hudson River Trading Letter’’); Bosier Parsons, Bright Trading LLC, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Parsons Letter’’); Mike Stewart, Head of Global Equities, UBS, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘UBS Letter’’); Dr. Larry Paden, Bright Trading, dated December 1, 2011 (‘‘Paden Letter’’); Thomas Dercks, dated December 1, 2011 (‘‘Dercks Letter’’); Eric Swanson, Secretary, BATS Global Markets, Inc., dated December 6, 2011 (‘‘BATS Letter’’); Ann Vlcek, Director and Associate General Counsel, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, dated December 7, 2011 (‘‘SIFMA Letter’’); and Al Patten, dated December 29, 2011 (‘‘Patten Letter’’). 5 See Knight Letter; CFA Letter; TD Ameritrade Letter; and letter to the Commission from Shannon Jennewein, dated November 30, 2011 (‘‘Jennewein Letter’’). 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66003, 76 FR 80445 (December 23, 2011). 7 17 CFR 242.612(c). E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12626-12629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4911]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66462; File No. SR-NYSE-2012-06]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Amending the Definition of 
Approved Person To Exclude Foreign Affiliates, Eliminating the 
Application Process for Approved Persons, and Making Related Technical 
and Conforming Changes

February 24, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on February 14, 2012, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' 
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, 
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the definition of approved person to 
exclude foreign affiliates, eliminate the application process for 
approved persons, and make related technical and conforming changes. 
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the 
Commission's Public Reference Room, and www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text

[[Page 12627]]

of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV 
below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, 
and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the definition of approved person to 
exclude foreign affiliates, eliminate the application process for 
approved persons, and make related technical and conforming changes. 
Following approval of the proposed rule change, the Exchange will 
advise member organizations of the implementation date of the rule 
change via Information Memo.
Background
    The current rules governing the definition of and application 
process for an approved person are NYSE Rules 2 and 304. If the 
definition requirements under NYSE Rule 2 are met, then the person or 
entity has to apply to the Exchange for approval to register as an 
approved person. This requirement is intended to bring certain 
affiliates of Exchange member organizations within the Exchange's 
jurisdiction and to subject such affiliates' activities to Exchange 
rules to the extent their activities are related to the activities of 
the member organization.
    NYSE Rule 2(c) defines the term ``approved person'' as ``a person, 
other than a member, principal executive or employee of a member 
organization, who controls a member organization or is engaged in a 
securities or kindred business that is controlled by or under common 
control with a member or member organization who has been approved by 
the Exchange as an approved person.'' NYSE Rule 2(d) further defines 
``person'' to include not only natural persons, but also corporations, 
limited liability companies, partnerships, associations and other 
organized groups of persons. NYSE Rule 2(e) defines the term 
``control'' to mean the power to direct or cause the direction of 
management or policies, whether through ownership of securities, by 
contract or otherwise, and creates a rebuttable presumption of control 
if the person has a right to vote 25 percent or more of the voting 
securities, is entitled to receive 25 percent or more of the net 
profits, or is a director, general partner, or principal executive of 
the member organization. NYSE Rule 2(f) defines ``engage in a 
securities or kindred business'' to mean transacting business as a 
broker or dealer in securities. Thus, the current definition of 
approved person includes a foreign affiliate of a member organization 
that is engaged in a broker-dealer business, but does not include, for 
example, a registered investment company. NYSE Rules 2A(e) and (f) 
further provide that the Exchange has jurisdiction after notice and a 
hearing to discipline approved persons in connection with the member 
organization's business and has jurisdiction over any and all other 
functions of approved persons in connection with the member 
organization's business in order for the Exchange to comply with its 
statutory obligation as a self-regulatory organization (``SRO'').
    NYSE Rules 304 and 311(a) require, with limited exceptions, that 
persons who meet the NYSE Rule 2(c) definition of an approved person 
must apply for approval by the Exchange as an approved person. NYSE 
Rule 304 further provides that no person may become or remain an 
approved person unless such person meets the standards prescribed in 
the Exchange's rules, and it prescribes the process that an applicant 
must follow to become an approved person. Among other things, this 
process involves submission to the Exchange of a completed Form AP-1 
(in the case of a corporation or other legal entity) or Forms AD-G 2 
and AD-G 3 (in the case of a natural person, collectively referred to 
as ``AD-G''), and other pertinent information regarding the candidate 
for approval. By executing the Form AP-1 or AD-G, as applicable, the 
approved person affirmatively consents to the Exchange's jurisdiction.
Proposed Rule Change
    The Exchange proposes to amend the definition of approved person in 
NYSE Rule 2 to revise the definition of which entities are deemed to be 
under ``common control'' with a member organization. The Exchange 
believes that the current definition, which includes certain foreign 
affiliates, is overbroad and it is unnecessary to assert jurisdiction 
over a foreign affiliate of a member organization that does not control 
a member organization. The Exchange notes that excluding such foreign 
affiliates from its jurisdiction would be consistent with Rule 19g2-1 
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), 
which provides that an exchange is not required to enforce compliance 
with its rules against certain persons \4\; the Exchange has not 
identified a rule of any other SRO that asserts jurisdiction over a 
foreign affiliate under common control with a member of that SRO. As 
such, the Exchange proposes to amend the definition of approved person 
so that it would include any person, other than a member, principal 
executive or employee of a member organization, who controls a member 
organization, is engaged in a securities or kindred business that is 
controlled by a member or member organization, or is a U.S. registered 
broker-dealer under common control with a member organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 17 CFR 240.19g2-1. Under Rule 19g2-1, a national 
securities exchange is not required to enforce compliance, within 
the meaning of Section 19(g) of the Act, with the Act and the rules 
and regulations thereunder, to [sic] with respect to persons 
associated with a member, other than securities persons or persons 
who control a member. Under Rule 19g2-1(b)(1), a ``securities 
person'' is defined as a ``person who is a general partner or 
officer (or person occupying a similar status or performing similar 
functions) or employee of a member; provided, however, that a 
registered broker or dealer which controls, is controlled by, or is 
under common control with, the member and the general partners and 
officers (and persons occupying similar status or performing similar 
functions) and employees of such a registered broker or dealer shall 
be securities persons if they effect, directly or indirectly, 
transactions in securities through the member by use of facilities 
maintained or supervised by such exchange or association.'' A 
foreign broker-dealer not registered in the United States that is 
under common control with an NYSE member organization falls outside 
of the definition of ``securities person.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By changing the definition of approved person to exclude certain 
foreign affiliates, the Exchange does not intend to eliminate certain 
controls in Exchange rules related to potential conflicts of interest 
associated with having a foreign affiliate under common control with a 
member organization. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes several 
amendments to its Rules. First, the Exchange proposes to amend 
paragraphs (3) and (4) of NYSE Rule 21 to provide that a member of the 
Exchange's Board of Directors or an authorized committee who is 
associated with a member organization cannot participate in the 
deliberations concerning the listing of a security if the Director 
knows that an affiliate of the member organization directly or 
indirectly owns one percent or more of any class of stock of the issuer 
or has a contract, option, or privilege to purchase the security to be 
listed. Second, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 22 to provide 
that a member of certain NYSE boards and committees may not participate 
in the consideration of any matter if there are certain types of 
indebtedness between the board or committee member and a member 
organization's affiliate or other

[[Page 12628]]

related parties. Third, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 98A, 
which provides that no issuer, or partner or subsidiary thereof, may 
become an approved person of a Designated Market Maker (``DMM'') unit 
that is registered in the stock of that issuer, to provide instead that 
a DMM unit may not be registered in a stock of an issuer, or a partner 
or subsidiary thereof, if such entity is either an approved person or 
an affiliate of the DMM unit's member organization. Finally, the 
Exchange proposes to amend Supplementary Material .30(c) of Rule 402 to 
provide that when securities are callable in part under the Rule, a 
member organization may not allocate any called securities to the 
account of an affiliate until all customer positions have been 
satisfied.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange does not believe any amendment to NYSE Rules 
22, 91, 96, 112, 422, 410A, 460, or 1301 is necessary as a result of 
the proposed rule change; the Exchange believes such Rules would 
continue to be consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act 
and the manner in which such they address potential conflicts of 
interest is appropriate under the circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend its rules to remove the 
requirement that the Exchange affirmatively approve each application to 
become an approved person. If a person meets the definition of an 
approved person, as proposed, the Exchange will obtain jurisdiction by 
consent as described below. The Exchange believes that the current 
application process requires the submission of a substantial amount of 
information and documents related to member organization affiliates 
that is unnecessary to carry out the Exchange's regulatory 
responsibilities. In particular, because the Exchange is no longer the 
Designated Examining Authority (``DEA'') for Exchange member 
organizations,\6\ the Exchange does not believe that it needs to engage 
in a detailed financial review of approved persons of its member 
organization applicants. The Exchange further notes that other SROs do 
not require that such persons undergo such an application and approval 
process.\7\ The Exchange, therefore, proposes to remove all references 
to an approval process and the submission of an application for such 
approval from NYSE Rules 304, 308, and 311. The Exchange also would 
eliminate use of the Forms AP-1 and AD-G.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Prospective member organization applicants must be either a 
member of FINRA or, if the applicant does not transact business with 
public customers or conduct business on the Floor of the Exchange, a 
member of another registered securities exchange, before being 
approved as an Exchange member organization. See NYSE Rule 2(b)(i). 
Generally, FINRA or the other exchange already is, or will be, 
designated as the DEA under SEC Rule 17d-1 and the Exchange will not 
be designated as such. Currently, the Exchange is not the DEA for 
any of its member organizations, but if it were designated as the 
DEA, the Exchange has retained FINRA to perform services related to 
meeting the Exchange's DEA responsibilities for a member 
organization.
    \7\ For example, the rules of FINRA and The NASDAQ Stock Market, 
Inc. do not impose application and approval requirements on member 
affiliates. See also note 9, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nevertheless, the Exchange's jurisdiction over approved persons in 
accordance with the revised definition would remain. Thus, the Exchange 
proposes to amend NYSE Rule 304 to provide specifically that a member 
organization would be required to identify all of its approved persons 
to the Exchange and each such approved person would continue to be 
required to consent to the Exchange's jurisdiction. Specifically, an 
approved person would continue to have to agree to (i) inform the 
Exchange of any statutory disqualification of the approved person under 
Section 3(a)(39) of the Act, (ii) abide by the Rules of the Exchange 
relating to approved persons, and (iii) permit examination by the 
Exchange, or any person designated by it, of its books and records to 
verify the accuracy of the information required to be supplied under 
Exchange Rules.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange proposes to eliminate the text in current Rule 
304(e)(1), which requires an approved person to supply information 
concerning its relationship with the member organization. This 
provision relates to information required to be submitted on Form 
AP-1 or AD-G, and as such it is not necessary to retain it in 
proposed Rule 304.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The focus on identification of approved persons by each member 
organization and consent to jurisdiction by each approved person, 
instead of review and approval of applications by the Exchange, would 
make the entire process more efficient while maintaining appropriate 
regulatory standards. The proposed rule change would remove unnecessary 
paperwork in the process while holding each member organization 
accountable for identifying to the Exchange its affiliates and approved 
persons. The remaining jurisdictional requirements for approved persons 
would enable the Exchange to continue to pursue matters involving or 
affecting its member organizations.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange notes that FINRA is in the process of 
harmonizing legacy NASD and NYSE Rules, and has published a proposal 
to harmonize membership rules. See FINRA Regulatory Notice 10-01. 
While FINRA has proposed that a member firm be required to provide 
certain information about affiliates, FINRA has not proposed to 
adopt the approved person definition or application process, or 
assert jurisdiction over such persons. When FINRA completes that 
harmonization process for the membership rules, the Exchange will 
consider whether further amendments to its approved person rules are 
advisable. Until such time, the Exchange believes that the narrowing 
of the approved person definition and the elimination of the 
approved person application process will remove unnecessary 
complexities and excessive informational requirements and thereby 
reduce burdens on membership applicants and member organizations 
while still maintaining high regulatory standards consistent with 
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to make technical and conforming changes 
to other rules. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 476A, 
which addresses minor rule violations, to correct a citation to Rule 
304. The Exchange further proposes to make technical amendments to 
replace the term ``allied member'' with ``principal executive'' in 
Rules 21, 22, 91, 96, 112, 308, 410A, 422, 460, and 1301 and NYSE Rule 
Interpretation for Rule 304, delete ``allied member'' from Rule 304A, 
and delete NYSE Rule Interpretation for Rule 304A entirely; the 
Exchange replaced the term ``allied member'' with the term ``principal 
executive'' in an earlier rule filing and the proposed amendments are 
consistent with the previous rule filing.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58549 (September 
15, 2008), 73 FR 54444 (September 19, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-80).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) \11\ of 
the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) 
\12\ in particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with 
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove 
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and 
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest. More specifically, the NYSE believes that the proposed 
approved person definition and consent to jurisdiction process would 
remove unnecessary complexities and excessive informational 
requirements and create a more efficient and less burdensome process 
for membership applicants and member organizations while maintaining 
appropriate regulatory standards. As such, the proposed rule change 
would contribute to removing impediments to and perfecting the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not

[[Page 12629]]

necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSE-2012-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2012-06. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the hours 
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for 
inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and on its 
Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted 
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying 
information from submissions. You should submit only information that 
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to 
File Number SR-NYSE-2012-06 and should be submitted on or before March 
22, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4911 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.