Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Amex Equities Rule 123C(4) To Provide for How Certain Interest Is Included in the Calculation of MOC and LOC Imbalances, 10584-10586 [2012-4079]
Download as PDF
10584
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Notices
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–NYSE–
2012–03 and should be submitted on or
before March 14, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–66400; File No. SR–
NYSEAmex–2012–07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Amex LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Amending NYSE Amex
Equities Rule 123C(4) To Provide for
How Certain Interest Is Included in the
Calculation of MOC and LOC
Imbalances
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
February 15, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on February
3, 2012, NYSE Amex LLC (the
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Amex Equities Rule 123C(4) to
provide for how certain interest is
included in the calculation of MOC and
LOC imbalances. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange, the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, and www.nyse.com,
and www.sec.gov.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2012–4080 Filed 2–21–12; 8:45 am]
10 17
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Amex’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Amex Equities Rule 123C(4) to
provide more specificity of how certain
interest is treated for purpose of
calculating MOC and LOC 4 imbalances.
In particular, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi) to describe
how LOC orders priced equal to the last
sale are treated in the imbalance
publication and to add new
supplementary material to describe how
sell short interest is treated in the
imbalance publication during a Short
Sale Period, as defined in NYSE Amex
Equities Rule 440B.
Background
NYSE Amex Equities Rule 123C(4)
describes how the Exchange calculates
the MOC and LOC imbalances. The
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Feb 21, 2012
4 See NYSE Amex Equities Rule 13 for definitions
of MOC and LOC orders.
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange publishes MOC and LOC
imbalance information as part of its
Informational Imbalance Publication (as
defined in Rule 123C(1)(b)), Mandatory
MOC/LOC Imbalance Publication (as
defined in Rule 123C(1)(d)), and Order
Imbalance Information (as defined in
Rule 123C(1)(e)), which are further
described in Rule 123C(5) and (6). The
MOC and LOC imbalance information is
intended to provide market participants
with a snapshot of the prices at which
interest eligible to participate in the
closing transaction would be executed
in full against each other at the time the
data feed is disseminated. The manner
by which the imbalance is calculated
takes into consideration the order of
execution at the close, as set forth in
Rule 123C(7). The goal of such
transparency is to attract contra-side
interest to offset order imbalances,
thereby potentially minimizing price
dislocation at the close.
Proposed Amendments
Because the MOC and LOC imbalance
calculations under Rule 123C(4) are
intended to provide an informational
snapshot of what an imbalance may be
at a particular time, and are intended to
mirror how the imbalance is calculated
for purposes of determining the closing
price, the Exchange proposes to amend
elements of Rule 123C(4) to describe
with more specificity how the
imbalance is calculated. The Exchange
notes that these proposed rule change
does not change how the Exchange
currently calculates the imbalance
information, but rather provides more
detail in the rule text concerning the
methodology for calculation.
First, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi) to describe
with more specificity how LOC interest
that is priced equal to the last sale is
addressed in the MOC and LOC
imbalance calculation. Because the Buy
or Sell Imbalance is intended to be
indicative of what the imbalance would
be at the close, the Exchange seeks to
reduce the Buy or Sell Imbalance by any
closing interest that could potentially
participate in the close, which is why
the rule currently provides that tick
sensitive MOC and LOC interest can
reduce the Buy or Sell Imbalance to
bring the imbalance quantity as close to
zero as possible.
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi) to add that LOC
orders priced equal to the last sale also
reduce the Buy or Sell Imbalance. The
Exchange proposes this change because,
as set forth in Rule 123C(7)(b)(ii), LOC
orders priced equal to the closing price
may participate in the closing
transaction. Because such interest may
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
participate in the close, the Exchange
believes that when calculating the
imbalance, reducing the Buy or Sell
Imbalance by the amount of LOC
interest priced equal to the last sale
provides a potentially more realistic
indication of how the imbalance may be
offset at the close.
Second, the Exchange proposes to
make conforming amendments to Rules
123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) and (B), which
currently provide more detail of which
tick sensitive interest is included to
offset a Buy or Sell Imbalance, as
provided for under Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi).
Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) currently
provides that of tick sensitive orders,
only Sell Plus 5 MOC and Sell Plus LOC
orders priced below the last sale will be
included to offset the Buy Imbalance.
Rule 123C4(a)(vi)(B) currently provides
that of tick sensitive orders, only Buy
Minus 6 MOC and Buy Minus LOC
orders priced above the last sale price
will be included to offset the Sell
Imbalance. Because the Exchange is
proposing to amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi)
to add that LOC interest priced equal to
the last sale price can offset the Buy or
Sell Imbalance, the Exchange proposes
to make conforming amendments to
Rules 123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) and (B).
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) to specify
that Sell Plus LOC orders priced equal
to or below the last sale price and Sell
and Sell Short LOC orders priced equal
to the last sale price will also be
included to offset the Buy Imbalance.
5 As defined in NYSE Amex Equities Rule 13, a
Sell Plus order is a market or limit order to sell a
stated amount of stock for which the price to be
obtained is not lower than the last sale if the last
sale was a ‘‘plus’’ or ‘‘zero plus’’ tick, and is not
lower than the last sale plus the minimal fractional
change in the stock if the last sale was a ‘‘minus’’
or ‘‘zero minus’’ tick. The purpose of a Sell Plus
order is to ensure that a market participant does
create a new low price with the sell order. For
example, if the closing price is $10.10, and the last
sale prior to the closing transaction was $10.11 or
higher on a plus or zero plus tick, a Sell Plus LOC
with a limit of $10.09 would not participate in the
closing transaction because it would be selling at a
price lower than the last sale, which was on a plus
or zero plus tick.
6 As defined in NYSE Amex Equities Rule 13, a
Buy Minus order is a market or limit order to buy
a stated amount of stock on the close for which the
price to be obtained is not higher than the last sale
if the last sale was a ‘‘minus’’ or ‘‘zero minus’’ tick,
and is not higher than the last sale minus the
minimum fractional change in the stock if the last
sale was a ‘‘plus’’ or ‘‘zero plus’’ tick. The purpose
of a Buy Minus order is to ensure that a market
participant does not create a new high price with
the buy order. For example, if the closing price is
$10.10, and the last sale prior to the closing
transaction was $10.09 or below on a minus or zero
minus tick, a Buy Minus LOC with a limit price of
$10.11 would not participate in the closing
transaction because it would be buying at a price
higher than the last sale, which was on a minus or
zero minus tick.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Feb 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
Similarly, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi)(B) to specify
that Buy Minus LOC orders priced equal
to or above the last sale price, and Buy
LOC orders priced equal to the last sale
will be included to offset the Sell
Imbalance.
Third, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) and (B) to
further specify that tick sensitive
interest will be included to offset the
Buy or Sell Imbalance only if such
orders could be executed consistent
with the terms of their tick restrictions.
This proposed amendment is consistent
with the rationale of how MOC and LOC
imbalances are calculated, namely, to
include interest that could participate in
the closing price to offset the imbalance.
If, by the terms of the tick restriction, an
order could not participate in the close,
such interest should not be used to
offset the imbalance calculation. For
example, if the Buy Imbalance is
calculated based on a $10.10 reference
price, and the last sale prior to that
reference price is $10.11 on a plus or
zero plus tick, Sell Plus MOCs and Sell
Plus LOCs are not included to offset that
Buy Imbalance because they would not
participate if that were the closing price
at that time. Likewise, if the last sale is
$10.09 on a minus or zero minus tick,
and the Sell Imbalance is calculated
based on a $10.10 reference price, Buy
Minus MOCs and Buy Minus LOCS
priced below the last sale are not
included to offset the Sell Imbalance
because they would not participate if
that were the closing price at that time.
Finally, the Exchange proposes to add
supplementary material .30 to Rule
123C to specify how Sell Short interest
is treated for purposes of calculating
MOC and LOC imbalances during a
Short Sale Period, as defined in Rule
440B(d). Rule 123C(4)(a)(iv) currently
provides that Sell Short MOC and Sell
Short LOC orders priced below the last
sale price are included in the
aggregation of the Sell side closing
volume. During a Short Sale Period, if
a security closes at a price equal to or
lower than the last Exchange bid, sell
short interest would not be eligible to
participate in the closing transaction.
Because a Sell imbalance publication is
an indication that the security is more
likely to close at a price that is equal to
or lower than the bid, during a Short
Sale Period, Sell Short MOC and LOC
interest likely would not participate in
the closing transaction. The Exchange
therefore believes it is appropriate
during a Short Sale Period to exclude
Sell Short MOC and LOC orders from
the Sell side volume because such
interest would likely not be eligible to
participate in the closing transaction.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10585
In addition, during a Short Sale
Period, in addition to the interest
specified in Rule 123C(a)(4)(vi)(A) that
offsets the Buy Imbalance (as amended
by this rule proposal), all Sell Short
MOC and LOC interest priced equal to
or below the last sale price will be
included to offset the Buy Imbalance.
During a Short Sale Period, if a security
closes higher than the last Exchange bid,
Sell Short MOC and LOC interest would
be eligible to participate in the closing
transaction. Because a Buy side
imbalance publication is an indication
that there may be upward price pressure
on the closing sale price, and the
security is more likely to close at a price
that is above the bid, in such a situation,
Sell Short MOC and LOC interest likely
would participate in the closing
transaction. The Exchange therefore
believes it is appropriate during a Short
Sale Period to offset the Buy Imbalance
with Sell Short MOC and LOC interest
because such interest would likely
participate in the closing transaction.
The Exchange notes that the manner
by which the Exchange currently
calculates the MOC and LOC
imbalances is consistent with how such
interest would participate if the closing
transaction were to be based on the
point in time at which each MOC and
LOC imbalance publication is
calculated. The Exchange proposes
these rule amendments to provide that
level of specificity in how the rule text
describes the manner by which the
MOC and LOC imbalances are being
calculated. The Exchange further notes
that this rule change concerns only the
manner by which the MOC and LOC
imbalance is calculated for purposes of
imbalance publications and does not
change in any way the manner by which
trading occurs at the Exchange or how
interest is executed in the closing
transaction.
2. Statutory Basis
The basis under the Act for these
proposed rule changes are the
requirement under Section 6(b)(5) 7 that
an Exchange have rules that are
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Specifically, this rule
proposal supports the objective of
perfecting the mechanism of a free and
open market as it provides transparency
in the manner by which the Exchange
calculates the MOC and LOC imbalance
information that the Exchange publishes
7 15
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
22FEN1
10586
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Notices
pursuant to NYSE Amex Equities Rule
123C(5) and (6) both during regular
trading and during a Short Sale Period
pursuant to NYSE Amex Equities Rule
440B. Specifically, these rule changes
provide transparency of how LOC
interest priced equal to the last sale
price will be used to offset a Buy or Sell
Imbalance and how Sell Short interest
will be treated for the imbalance
calculation during a Short Sale Period.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–
NYSEAmex–2012–07 on the subject
line.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
Paper Comments
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–NYSEAmex–2012–07. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–
NYSEAmex–2012–07 and should be
submitted on or before March 14, 2012.
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 8 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.9 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–4079 Filed 2–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
9 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Feb 21, 2012
10 17
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–66397; File Nos. SR–NYSE–
2011–56; SR–NYSEAmex–2011–86]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE
Amex LLC; Order Instituting
Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Disapprove Proposed Rule Changes
To Codify Certain Traditional Trading
Floor Functions That May Be
Performed by Designated Market
Makers and To Permit Designated
Market Makers and Floor Brokers
Access to Disaggregated Order
Information
February 15, 2012.
I. Introduction
On October 31, 2011, the New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) and
NYSE Amex LLC (‘‘NYSE Amex’’)
(collectively, the ‘‘SROs’’) each filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 proposed rule
changes (the ‘‘SRO Proposals’’) to
amend certain of their respective rules
relating to Designated Market Makers
(‘‘DMMs’’) 3 and Floor brokers. The SRO
Proposals were published for comment
in the Federal Register on November 17,
2011.4 The Commission received no
comment letters on the proposals.
On December 22, 2011, the
Commission extended the time period
in which to either approve the SRO
Proposals, disapprove the SRO
Proposals, or to institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See NYSE Rule 98(b)(2). ‘‘DMM unit’’ means
any member organization, aggregation unit within
a member organization, or division or department
within an integrated proprietary aggregation unit of
a member organization that (i) has been approved
by NYSE Regulation pursuant to section (c) of
NYSE Rule 98, (ii) is eligible for allocations under
NYSE Rule 103B as a DMM unit in a security listed
on the Exchange, and (iii) has met all registration
and qualification requirements for DMM units
assigned to such unit. The term ‘‘DMM’’ means any
individual qualified to act as a DMM on the Floor
of the Exchange under NYSE Rule 103. See also
NYSE Amex Equities Rule 2(i). Rule 2(i) defines the
term ‘‘DMM’’ to mean an individual member,
officer, partner, employee or associated person of a
DMM unit who is approved by the Exchange to act
in the capacity of a DMM. NYSE Amex Equities
Rule 2(j) defines the term ‘‘DMM unit’’ as a member
organization or unit within a member organization
that has been approved to act as a DMM unit under
NYSE Amex Equities Rule 98.
4 Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 65735
(November 10, 2011), 76 FR 71405 (SR–
NYSEAmex–2011–86) and 65736 (November 10,
2011), 76 FR 71399 (SR–NYSE–2011–56).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10584-10586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4079]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-66400; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2012-07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Amex
Equities Rule 123C(4) To Provide for How Certain Interest Is Included
in the Calculation of MOC and LOC Imbalances
February 15, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on February 3, 2012, NYSE Amex LLC (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Amex'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Amex Equities Rule 123C(4) to
provide for how certain interest is included in the calculation of MOC
and LOC imbalances. The text of the proposed rule change is available
at the Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and
www.nyse.com, and www.sec.gov.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Amex Equities Rule 123C(4) to
provide more specificity of how certain interest is treated for purpose
of calculating MOC and LOC \4\ imbalances. In particular, the Exchange
proposes to amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi) to describe how LOC orders priced
equal to the last sale are treated in the imbalance publication and to
add new supplementary material to describe how sell short interest is
treated in the imbalance publication during a Short Sale Period, as
defined in NYSE Amex Equities Rule 440B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See NYSE Amex Equities Rule 13 for definitions of MOC and
LOC orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
NYSE Amex Equities Rule 123C(4) describes how the Exchange
calculates the MOC and LOC imbalances. The Exchange publishes MOC and
LOC imbalance information as part of its Informational Imbalance
Publication (as defined in Rule 123C(1)(b)), Mandatory MOC/LOC
Imbalance Publication (as defined in Rule 123C(1)(d)), and Order
Imbalance Information (as defined in Rule 123C(1)(e)), which are
further described in Rule 123C(5) and (6). The MOC and LOC imbalance
information is intended to provide market participants with a snapshot
of the prices at which interest eligible to participate in the closing
transaction would be executed in full against each other at the time
the data feed is disseminated. The manner by which the imbalance is
calculated takes into consideration the order of execution at the
close, as set forth in Rule 123C(7). The goal of such transparency is
to attract contra-side interest to offset order imbalances, thereby
potentially minimizing price dislocation at the close.
Proposed Amendments
Because the MOC and LOC imbalance calculations under Rule 123C(4)
are intended to provide an informational snapshot of what an imbalance
may be at a particular time, and are intended to mirror how the
imbalance is calculated for purposes of determining the closing price,
the Exchange proposes to amend elements of Rule 123C(4) to describe
with more specificity how the imbalance is calculated. The Exchange
notes that these proposed rule change does not change how the Exchange
currently calculates the imbalance information, but rather provides
more detail in the rule text concerning the methodology for
calculation.
First, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi) to
describe with more specificity how LOC interest that is priced equal to
the last sale is addressed in the MOC and LOC imbalance calculation.
Because the Buy or Sell Imbalance is intended to be indicative of what
the imbalance would be at the close, the Exchange seeks to reduce the
Buy or Sell Imbalance by any closing interest that could potentially
participate in the close, which is why the rule currently provides that
tick sensitive MOC and LOC interest can reduce the Buy or Sell
Imbalance to bring the imbalance quantity as close to zero as possible.
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi) to add that LOC
orders priced equal to the last sale also reduce the Buy or Sell
Imbalance. The Exchange proposes this change because, as set forth in
Rule 123C(7)(b)(ii), LOC orders priced equal to the closing price may
participate in the closing transaction. Because such interest may
[[Page 10585]]
participate in the close, the Exchange believes that when calculating
the imbalance, reducing the Buy or Sell Imbalance by the amount of LOC
interest priced equal to the last sale provides a potentially more
realistic indication of how the imbalance may be offset at the close.
Second, the Exchange proposes to make conforming amendments to
Rules 123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) and (B), which currently provide more detail of
which tick sensitive interest is included to offset a Buy or Sell
Imbalance, as provided for under Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi). Rule
123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) currently provides that of tick sensitive orders,
only Sell Plus \5\ MOC and Sell Plus LOC orders priced below the last
sale will be included to offset the Buy Imbalance. Rule 123C4(a)(vi)(B)
currently provides that of tick sensitive orders, only Buy Minus \6\
MOC and Buy Minus LOC orders priced above the last sale price will be
included to offset the Sell Imbalance. Because the Exchange is
proposing to amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi) to add that LOC interest priced
equal to the last sale price can offset the Buy or Sell Imbalance, the
Exchange proposes to make conforming amendments to Rules
123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) and (B). Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) to specify that Sell Plus LOC orders priced
equal to or below the last sale price and Sell and Sell Short LOC
orders priced equal to the last sale price will also be included to
offset the Buy Imbalance. Similarly, the Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi)(B) to specify that Buy Minus LOC orders priced
equal to or above the last sale price, and Buy LOC orders priced equal
to the last sale will be included to offset the Sell Imbalance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ As defined in NYSE Amex Equities Rule 13, a Sell Plus order
is a market or limit order to sell a stated amount of stock for
which the price to be obtained is not lower than the last sale if
the last sale was a ``plus'' or ``zero plus'' tick, and is not lower
than the last sale plus the minimal fractional change in the stock
if the last sale was a ``minus'' or ``zero minus'' tick. The purpose
of a Sell Plus order is to ensure that a market participant does
create a new low price with the sell order. For example, if the
closing price is $10.10, and the last sale prior to the closing
transaction was $10.11 or higher on a plus or zero plus tick, a Sell
Plus LOC with a limit of $10.09 would not participate in the closing
transaction because it would be selling at a price lower than the
last sale, which was on a plus or zero plus tick.
\6\ As defined in NYSE Amex Equities Rule 13, a Buy Minus order
is a market or limit order to buy a stated amount of stock on the
close for which the price to be obtained is not higher than the last
sale if the last sale was a ``minus'' or ``zero minus'' tick, and is
not higher than the last sale minus the minimum fractional change in
the stock if the last sale was a ``plus'' or ``zero plus'' tick. The
purpose of a Buy Minus order is to ensure that a market participant
does not create a new high price with the buy order. For example, if
the closing price is $10.10, and the last sale prior to the closing
transaction was $10.09 or below on a minus or zero minus tick, a Buy
Minus LOC with a limit price of $10.11 would not participate in the
closing transaction because it would be buying at a price higher
than the last sale, which was on a minus or zero minus tick.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123C(4)(a)(vi)(A) and
(B) to further specify that tick sensitive interest will be included to
offset the Buy or Sell Imbalance only if such orders could be executed
consistent with the terms of their tick restrictions. This proposed
amendment is consistent with the rationale of how MOC and LOC
imbalances are calculated, namely, to include interest that could
participate in the closing price to offset the imbalance. If, by the
terms of the tick restriction, an order could not participate in the
close, such interest should not be used to offset the imbalance
calculation. For example, if the Buy Imbalance is calculated based on a
$10.10 reference price, and the last sale prior to that reference price
is $10.11 on a plus or zero plus tick, Sell Plus MOCs and Sell Plus
LOCs are not included to offset that Buy Imbalance because they would
not participate if that were the closing price at that time. Likewise,
if the last sale is $10.09 on a minus or zero minus tick, and the Sell
Imbalance is calculated based on a $10.10 reference price, Buy Minus
MOCs and Buy Minus LOCS priced below the last sale are not included to
offset the Sell Imbalance because they would not participate if that
were the closing price at that time.
Finally, the Exchange proposes to add supplementary material .30 to
Rule 123C to specify how Sell Short interest is treated for purposes of
calculating MOC and LOC imbalances during a Short Sale Period, as
defined in Rule 440B(d). Rule 123C(4)(a)(iv) currently provides that
Sell Short MOC and Sell Short LOC orders priced below the last sale
price are included in the aggregation of the Sell side closing volume.
During a Short Sale Period, if a security closes at a price equal to or
lower than the last Exchange bid, sell short interest would not be
eligible to participate in the closing transaction. Because a Sell
imbalance publication is an indication that the security is more likely
to close at a price that is equal to or lower than the bid, during a
Short Sale Period, Sell Short MOC and LOC interest likely would not
participate in the closing transaction. The Exchange therefore believes
it is appropriate during a Short Sale Period to exclude Sell Short MOC
and LOC orders from the Sell side volume because such interest would
likely not be eligible to participate in the closing transaction.
In addition, during a Short Sale Period, in addition to the
interest specified in Rule 123C(a)(4)(vi)(A) that offsets the Buy
Imbalance (as amended by this rule proposal), all Sell Short MOC and
LOC interest priced equal to or below the last sale price will be
included to offset the Buy Imbalance. During a Short Sale Period, if a
security closes higher than the last Exchange bid, Sell Short MOC and
LOC interest would be eligible to participate in the closing
transaction. Because a Buy side imbalance publication is an indication
that there may be upward price pressure on the closing sale price, and
the security is more likely to close at a price that is above the bid,
in such a situation, Sell Short MOC and LOC interest likely would
participate in the closing transaction. The Exchange therefore believes
it is appropriate during a Short Sale Period to offset the Buy
Imbalance with Sell Short MOC and LOC interest because such interest
would likely participate in the closing transaction.
The Exchange notes that the manner by which the Exchange currently
calculates the MOC and LOC imbalances is consistent with how such
interest would participate if the closing transaction were to be based
on the point in time at which each MOC and LOC imbalance publication is
calculated. The Exchange proposes these rule amendments to provide that
level of specificity in how the rule text describes the manner by which
the MOC and LOC imbalances are being calculated. The Exchange further
notes that this rule change concerns only the manner by which the MOC
and LOC imbalance is calculated for purposes of imbalance publications
and does not change in any way the manner by which trading occurs at
the Exchange or how interest is executed in the closing transaction.
2. Statutory Basis
The basis under the Act for these proposed rule changes are the
requirement under Section 6(b)(5) \7\ that an Exchange have rules that
are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. Specifically, this rule proposal
supports the objective of perfecting the mechanism of a free and open
market as it provides transparency in the manner by which the Exchange
calculates the MOC and LOC imbalance information that the Exchange
publishes
[[Page 10586]]
pursuant to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 123C(5) and (6) both during regular
trading and during a Short Sale Period pursuant to NYSE Amex Equities
Rule 440B. Specifically, these rule changes provide transparency of how
LOC interest priced equal to the last sale price will be used to offset
a Buy or Sell Imbalance and how Sell Short interest will be treated for
the imbalance calculation during a Short Sale Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2012-07 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2012-07. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2012-07 and should be
submitted on or before March 14, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4079 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P