Certain Video Displays and Products Using and Containing Same, 9964-9965 [2012-3875]
Download as PDF
9964
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
** These permits are prepared by BOEM and sent to respondents; therefore, the forms themselves do not incur burden hours.
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Non-Hour Cost Burden:
We have identified one non-hour
paperwork cost burden for this
collection: A $2,012 permit application
fee.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Until OMB approves a
collection of information, you are not
obliged to respond.
Comments: On August 24, 2011, we
published a Federal Register notice (76
FR 52963) announcing that we would
submit this ICR to OMB for approval.
The notice provided the required 60-day
comment period. We received two
comments in response. One did not
pertain to the information collection,
and the other expressed support for
competitive bidding processes.
In addition, § 580.80 provides the
OMB control number for the
information collection requirements
imposed by the 30 CFR 580 regulation,
informs the public that they may
comment at any time on the collections
of information, and provides the address
to which they should send comments.
We again request comments on this
information collection on: (1) Whether
or not the collection of information is
necessary, including whether or not the
information is useful; (2) the accuracy of
our estimate of the burden for this
collection of information; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden on the
respondents.
Public Availability of Comments:
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: February 13, 2012.
Deanna Meyer-Pietruszka,
Chief, Office of Policy, Regulations, and
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2012–3853 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Feb 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Availability of the Reclamation
National Environmental Policy Act
Handbook
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) is announcing the
availability of its updated National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Handbook. This handbook is intended
for use as guidance by Reclamation’s
NEPA practitioners. It provides a quick
reference for existing laws, regulations,
policies, and other guidance. It is a
guidance document, and as such, does
not create or alter any policy or
otherwise implement any law and
should not be cited as a source of
authority. Reclamation is announcing
the availability of its NEPA Handbook to
assure transparency of its efforts to the
public.
ADDRESSES: The updated Reclamation
NEPA Handbook is available online at
www.usbr.gov/NEPA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Cunningham, Water and
Environmental Resources Division,
Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007,
Denver, Colorado 80225; telephone 303–
445–2875.
SUMMARY:
Grayford F. Payne,
Deputy Commissioner—Policy,
Administration and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2012–3963 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–828]
Certain Video Displays and Products
Using and Containing Same
Institution of Investigation Pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
January 13, 2012, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Mondis
Technology, Ltd., of London, England.
The complaint alleges violations of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain video displays and products
using and containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 6,247,090 (‘‘the ‘090 patent’’)
and U.S. Patent No. 7,089,342 (‘‘the ‘342
patent’’). The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2011).
Scope Of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
February 14, 2012, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain video displays
and products using and containing same
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices
Issued: February 14, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
(a) The complainant is:
Mondis Technology, Ltd., Suite 3C,
Lyttelton House, 2 Lyttelton Road
London N2 0EF, England.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
that infringe one or more of claim 15 of
the ‘090 patent and claim 15 of the ‘342
patent, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
Chimei Innolux Corporation, 160
Kesyue Road, Miaoli County, Taiwan;
Innolux Corporation, 2525 Brockton
Drive Austin, TX 78759.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Feb 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
[FR Doc. 2012–3875 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[CPCLO Order No. 002–2012]
Department of Justice.
Notice of a new system of
records and removal of three systems of
records notices.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Pursuant to the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–130, notice is hereby given
that the Department of Justice (DOJ or
Department) proposes to establish a new
Department-wide system of records
notice, entitled Debt Collection
Enforcement System, JUSTICE/DOJ–
016. The purpose of publishing this
Department-wide system notice is to
reflect the Department’s consolidation
of its multiple debt collection systems,
which were previously maintained in
various individual DOJ components,
into a single, centralized system. The
new system will be used by all DOJ
components that currently have debt
collection and enforcement
responsibilities. The Department’s
consolidation of its debt collection
systems enables the Department to
improve data integrity, facilitate
communication among DOJ
components, support Department-wide
debt collection initiatives, provide for
better accountability and timely
reporting, and centralize administrative
functions and payment processing.
Because this system notice reflects the
consolidation of existing DOJ debt
collection and enforcement systems,
this notice replaces, and the Department
hereby removes the following system
notices previously published by
individual DOJ components:
1. Executive Office for United States
Attorneys, ‘‘Debt Collection
Enforcement System,’’ JUSTICE/USA–
015 (71 FR 42118, Jul. 25, 2006);
2. Justice Management Division
(JMD), ‘‘Debt Collection Management
System,’’
JUSTICE/JMD–006 (58 FR 60058, Nov.
12, 1993); and
3. JMD, ‘‘Debt Collection Offset
Payment System,’’ JUSTICE/JMD–009
(62 FR 33438, Jun. 19, 1997).
Also, this notice now covers debt
collection records that previously have
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9965
been part of or included in the following
systems of records notices:
1. Antitrust Division, ‘‘Antitrust
Information Management Information
System (AMIS)—Monthly Report,’’
JUSTICE/ATR–006 (63 FR 8659, Feb. 20,
1998) and ‘‘Antitrust Division Case
Cards,’’ JUSTICE/ATR–007 (60 FR
52692, Oct. 10, 1995);
2. Civil Division, ‘‘Central Civil
Division Case File System,’’ JUSTICE/
CIV–001 (63 FR 8659, Feb. 20, 1998);
3. Civil Rights Division, ‘‘Central Civil
Rights Division Index File and
Associated Records,’’ JUSTICE/CRT–001
(68 FR 47611, Aug. 11, 2003);
4. Criminal Division, ‘‘Central
Criminal Division Index File and
Associated Records,’’ JUSTICE/CRM–
001 (72 FR 44182, Aug. 7, 2007);
5. Environment and Natural
Resources Division, ‘‘Environment and
Natural Resources Division Case and
Related Files,’’ JUSTICE/ENRD–003 (65
FR 8990, Feb. 23, 2000); and
6. Tax Division, ‘‘Criminal Tax Files,
Special Project Files, Docket Cards and
Associated Records,’’ JUSTICE/TAX–
001 (71 FR 11447, Mar. 7, 2006) and
‘‘Tax Division Civil Tax Case Files,
Docket Cards, and Associated Records,’’
JUSTICE/TAX–002 (71 FR 11449, Mar.
7, 2006).
DATES: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552a(e)(4) and (11), the public is given
a 30-day period in which to comment.
Therefore, please submit any comments
by March 22, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The public, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
Congress are invited to submit any
comments to the Department of Justice,
ATTN: Privacy Analyst, Office of
Privacy and Civil Liberties, Department
of Justice, National Place Building, 1331
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1000,
Washington, DC 20530, or by facsimile
at (202) 307–0693.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Holley B. O’Brien, Director, Debt
Collection Management Staff (DCM),
Justice Management Division,
Department of Justice, 145 N Street, NE.,
Room 5E.101, Washington, DC 20530, at
(202) 514–5343.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r)
the Department has provided a report to
OMB and Congress on the new system
of records.
Dated: January 31, 2012.
Nancy C. Libin,
Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer,
United States Department of Justice.
JUSTICE/DOJ–016
SYSTEM NAME:
Debt Collection Enforcement System
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9964-9965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3875]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-828]
Certain Video Displays and Products Using and Containing Same
Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 13, 2012, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Mondis Technology, Ltd., of London, England. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain video displays and products using and
containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 6,247,090 (``the `090 patent'') and U.S. Patent No.
7,089,342 (``the `342 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011).
Scope Of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on February 14, 2012, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain video
displays and products using and containing same
[[Page 9965]]
that infringe one or more of claim 15 of the `090 patent and claim 15
of the `342 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Mondis Technology, Ltd., Suite 3C, Lyttelton House, 2 Lyttelton Road
London N2 0EF, England.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Chimei Innolux Corporation, 160 Kesyue Road, Miaoli County, Taiwan;
Innolux Corporation, 2525 Brockton Drive Austin, TX 78759.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 14, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-3875 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P