Certain Video Displays and Products Using and Containing Same, 9964-9965 [2012-3875]

Download as PDF 9964 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ** These permits are prepared by BOEM and sent to respondents; therefore, the forms themselves do not incur burden hours. Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Non-Hour Cost Burden: We have identified one non-hour paperwork cost burden for this collection: A $2,012 permit application fee. Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Until OMB approves a collection of information, you are not obliged to respond. Comments: On August 24, 2011, we published a Federal Register notice (76 FR 52963) announcing that we would submit this ICR to OMB for approval. The notice provided the required 60-day comment period. We received two comments in response. One did not pertain to the information collection, and the other expressed support for competitive bidding processes. In addition, § 580.80 provides the OMB control number for the information collection requirements imposed by the 30 CFR 580 regulation, informs the public that they may comment at any time on the collections of information, and provides the address to which they should send comments. We again request comments on this information collection on: (1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary, including whether or not the information is useful; (2) the accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden on the respondents. Public Availability of Comments: Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: February 13, 2012. Deanna Meyer-Pietruszka, Chief, Office of Policy, Regulations, and Analysis. [FR Doc. 2012–3853 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:29 Feb 17, 2012 Jkt 226001 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation Availability of the Reclamation National Environmental Policy Act Handbook Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is announcing the availability of its updated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Handbook. This handbook is intended for use as guidance by Reclamation’s NEPA practitioners. It provides a quick reference for existing laws, regulations, policies, and other guidance. It is a guidance document, and as such, does not create or alter any policy or otherwise implement any law and should not be cited as a source of authority. Reclamation is announcing the availability of its NEPA Handbook to assure transparency of its efforts to the public. ADDRESSES: The updated Reclamation NEPA Handbook is available online at www.usbr.gov/NEPA. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Cunningham, Water and Environmental Resources Division, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, Colorado 80225; telephone 303– 445–2875. SUMMARY: Grayford F. Payne, Deputy Commissioner—Policy, Administration and Budget. [FR Doc. 2012–3963 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–828] Certain Video Displays and Products Using and Containing Same Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337 AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on January 13, 2012, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Mondis Technology, Ltd., of London, England. The complaint alleges violations of SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain video displays and products using and containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,247,090 (‘‘the ‘090 patent’’) and U.S. Patent No. 7,089,342 (‘‘the ‘342 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011). Scope Of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on February 14, 2012, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain video displays and products using and containing same E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM 21FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices Issued: February 14, 2012. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. (a) The complainant is: Mondis Technology, Ltd., Suite 3C, Lyttelton House, 2 Lyttelton Road London N2 0EF, England. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES that infringe one or more of claim 15 of the ‘090 patent and claim 15 of the ‘342 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records Chimei Innolux Corporation, 160 Kesyue Road, Miaoli County, Taiwan; Innolux Corporation, 2525 Brockton Drive Austin, TX 78759. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:29 Feb 17, 2012 Jkt 226001 [FR Doc. 2012–3875 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [CPCLO Order No. 002–2012] Department of Justice. Notice of a new system of records and removal of three systems of records notices. AGENCY: ACTION: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A–130, notice is hereby given that the Department of Justice (DOJ or Department) proposes to establish a new Department-wide system of records notice, entitled Debt Collection Enforcement System, JUSTICE/DOJ– 016. The purpose of publishing this Department-wide system notice is to reflect the Department’s consolidation of its multiple debt collection systems, which were previously maintained in various individual DOJ components, into a single, centralized system. The new system will be used by all DOJ components that currently have debt collection and enforcement responsibilities. The Department’s consolidation of its debt collection systems enables the Department to improve data integrity, facilitate communication among DOJ components, support Department-wide debt collection initiatives, provide for better accountability and timely reporting, and centralize administrative functions and payment processing. Because this system notice reflects the consolidation of existing DOJ debt collection and enforcement systems, this notice replaces, and the Department hereby removes the following system notices previously published by individual DOJ components: 1. Executive Office for United States Attorneys, ‘‘Debt Collection Enforcement System,’’ JUSTICE/USA– 015 (71 FR 42118, Jul. 25, 2006); 2. Justice Management Division (JMD), ‘‘Debt Collection Management System,’’ JUSTICE/JMD–006 (58 FR 60058, Nov. 12, 1993); and 3. JMD, ‘‘Debt Collection Offset Payment System,’’ JUSTICE/JMD–009 (62 FR 33438, Jun. 19, 1997). Also, this notice now covers debt collection records that previously have SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 9965 been part of or included in the following systems of records notices: 1. Antitrust Division, ‘‘Antitrust Information Management Information System (AMIS)—Monthly Report,’’ JUSTICE/ATR–006 (63 FR 8659, Feb. 20, 1998) and ‘‘Antitrust Division Case Cards,’’ JUSTICE/ATR–007 (60 FR 52692, Oct. 10, 1995); 2. Civil Division, ‘‘Central Civil Division Case File System,’’ JUSTICE/ CIV–001 (63 FR 8659, Feb. 20, 1998); 3. Civil Rights Division, ‘‘Central Civil Rights Division Index File and Associated Records,’’ JUSTICE/CRT–001 (68 FR 47611, Aug. 11, 2003); 4. Criminal Division, ‘‘Central Criminal Division Index File and Associated Records,’’ JUSTICE/CRM– 001 (72 FR 44182, Aug. 7, 2007); 5. Environment and Natural Resources Division, ‘‘Environment and Natural Resources Division Case and Related Files,’’ JUSTICE/ENRD–003 (65 FR 8990, Feb. 23, 2000); and 6. Tax Division, ‘‘Criminal Tax Files, Special Project Files, Docket Cards and Associated Records,’’ JUSTICE/TAX– 001 (71 FR 11447, Mar. 7, 2006) and ‘‘Tax Division Civil Tax Case Files, Docket Cards, and Associated Records,’’ JUSTICE/TAX–002 (71 FR 11449, Mar. 7, 2006). DATES: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and (11), the public is given a 30-day period in which to comment. Therefore, please submit any comments by March 22, 2012. ADDRESSES: The public, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and Congress are invited to submit any comments to the Department of Justice, ATTN: Privacy Analyst, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties, Department of Justice, National Place Building, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20530, or by facsimile at (202) 307–0693. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holley B. O’Brien, Director, Debt Collection Management Staff (DCM), Justice Management Division, Department of Justice, 145 N Street, NE., Room 5E.101, Washington, DC 20530, at (202) 514–5343. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) the Department has provided a report to OMB and Congress on the new system of records. Dated: January 31, 2012. Nancy C. Libin, Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer, United States Department of Justice. JUSTICE/DOJ–016 SYSTEM NAME: Debt Collection Enforcement System E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM 21FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9964-9965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3875]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-828]


Certain Video Displays and Products Using and Containing Same

    Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 13, 2012, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Mondis Technology, Ltd., of London, England. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain video displays and products using and 
containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 
Patent No. 6,247,090 (``the `090 patent'') and U.S. Patent No. 
7,089,342 (``the `342 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an 
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) 
of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-2560.

    Authority:  The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011).
    Scope Of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on February 14, 2012, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain video 
displays and products using and containing same

[[Page 9965]]

that infringe one or more of claim 15 of the `090 patent and claim 15 
of the `342 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists 
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:

    (a) The complainant is:
Mondis Technology, Ltd., Suite 3C, Lyttelton House, 2 Lyttelton Road 
London N2 0EF, England.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Chimei Innolux Corporation, 160 Kesyue Road, Miaoli County, Taiwan; 
Innolux Corporation, 2525 Brockton Drive Austin, TX 78759.
    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.
     Issued: February 14, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-3875 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.