Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Implementing Changes to the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule Relating to Post Liquidity Credits, 9288-9290 [2012-3613]

Download as PDF 9288 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2012 / Notices interest, for securities traded pursuant to UTP. The Exchange proposes to reduce DMM units’ quoting obligations applicable to ‘‘more active’’ securities traded in the UTP Pilot Program to quoting at the NBBO for 5% of the trading day. The Commission notes that this percentage would reflect the quoting requirement currently applicable to DMM units quoting nonUTP Pilot Program securities, i.e., those listed on the Exchange.12 There would be one significant difference between the proposed quoting obligation for the UTP Pilot Program and the current quoting obligation for non-UTP Pilot Program securities—UTP Pilot Program quoting obligations are and would continue to be calculated on a securityby-security basis, rather than averaged across a portfolio of all of a DMM unit’s assigned securities. The Commission believes that this security-by-security basis calculation is reasonably designed to maintain robust quotes for all UTP Pilot Program securities. In addition, the Exchange’s proposal would reduce quoting obligations only for ‘‘more active’’ securities, which by definition are more liquid and may, therefore, be less reliant on quoting obligations for continued liquidity. Finally, based on the Exchange’s experience during the UTP Pilot Program, the proposed quoting obligation is designed to ensure the continued active participation by DMM units in such securities. The Commission also finds that the proposed deletion in NYSE Amex Equities Rule 504(b)(1)(A) to the reference to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 103B(II) is consistent with the Act. The Exchange represented that this reference is not necessary within Rule 504(b)(1)(A), and that, despite the proposed deletion, DMM units would remain subject to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 103B(II) with respect to security allocation eligibility. For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposal to amend the UTP Pilot Program is consistent with the requirements of the Act. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES IV. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the proposed rule change (SR–NYSEAmex– 2011–101) be, and it hereby is, approved. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.14 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–3611 Filed 2–15–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–66377; File No. SR– NYSEArca–2012–12] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Implementing Changes to the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule Relating to Post Liquidity Credits February 10, 2012. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that, on January 31, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to increase the Post Liquidity credits on Customer posted electronic executions and to delete references to Royalty Fees for foreign currency options, which the Exchange no longer trades. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the Commission’s Public Reference Room, and www.nyse.com. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. 14 17 12 See NYSE Amex Equities Rule 104(a)(1)(A). 13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:31 Feb 15, 2012 Jkt 226001 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to increase the Post Liquidity credits on Customer posted electronic executions and to delete references to Royalty Fees for foreign currency options, which the Exchange no longer trades. The Exchange proposes to make the rule change operative on February 1, 2012. Post Liquidity Credits Electronic transactions in Penny Pilot issues 3 are assessed Take Liquidity fees and credited with Post Liquidity credits. Under the current Fee Schedule, the Post Liquidity credit is $0.25 per contract for Customers, $0.32 per contract for Lead Market Makers and Market Makers, and $0.10 per contract for Firms and Broker Dealers. OTP Holders that provide aggregated Customer posting volume in Penny Pilot issues that exceeds certain thresholds receive higher Post Liquidity credits on all Customer posted electronic executions. Specifically, an OTP Holder sending Customer orders that in the aggregate exceed 500,000 contracts executed in a month from posting liquidity receives a Post Liquidity credit of $0.32 per contract on all executions resulting from posted liquidity. If such aggregated Customer orders exceed 800,000 contracts executed in a month from posting liquidity, the OTP Holder receives a Post Liquidity credit of $0.34 per contract on all executions resulting from posted liquidity. If such aggregated Customer orders exceed 1,200,000 contracts executed in a month from posting liquidity, the OTP Holder receives a Post Liquidity credit of $0.38 per contract on all executions resulting from posted liquidity. The volume thresholds are intended to incentivize firms to route additional Customer orders to the Exchange. The Exchange proposes to amend the volume thresholds for the Post Liquidity credits by lowering the initial volume threshold to qualify for the first level of higher Post Liquidity credits, generally raising the amount of the Post Liquidity 3 Under NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.72, options on certain issues have been approved to trade in a minimum price variation of $0.01 as part of a pilot program that is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2012. E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2012 / Notices credits for the next two volume thresholds, and creating a new higher volume threshold that will pay a higher Post Liquidity credit than is currently offered. The Exchange notes, however, that under the proposed volume thresholds, an OTP Holder that sends Customer orders that in the aggregate exceed 500,000 but not 800,000 contracts executed in a month will receive a lower Post Liquidity credit of $0.28 per contract, which is lower than the $0.32 Post Liquidity credit under the current Fee Schedule. The Exchange believes that the overall redistribution of the credits will in turn increase order flow to add liquidity on the Exchange and encourage greater participation by the largest market participants. The proposed volume thresholds and Post Liquidity credits are as follows: Monthly total customer contracts executed from posted liquidity Threshold Threshold Threshold Threshold 1 2 3 4 ................................................................... ................................................................... ................................................................... ................................................................... srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Royalty Fees for Foreign Currency Options The current Fee Schedule sets forth Royalty Fees for certain foreign currency options. Because the Exchange no longer trades foreign currency options, it proposes to delete references to such Royalty Fees. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 4 in general and Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 5 in particular because it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The proposed change is equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because it will apply uniformly to all similarly situated OTP Holders that direct Customer orders to the Exchange. The proposed fees also are equitably allocated and reasonable because they create an incrementally higher incentive for OTP Holders to bring additional liquidity to the Exchange, thereby contributing to price discovery and benefiting investors generally. Moreover, the difference between (1) the Post Liquidity credits received by OTP Holders that aggregate Customer orders, and (2) the Post Liquidity credit received by Firms and Broker Dealers is not inequitable or unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange believes that it has structured its Fee Schedule in a manner to attract order flow from all such entities. In this regard, the Exchange has found that the higher Post Liquidity credit for Firms and Broker Dealers has not caused them to send additional order flow to the 4 15 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:31 Feb 15, 2012 Jkt 226001 More More More More than than than than 350,000 ............................................................................. 800,000 ............................................................................. 1,200,000 .......................................................................... 3,500,000 .......................................................................... Exchange. Based on its observations, the Exchange believes that such entities focus on the ability to trade with Customer order flow to capture the spread rather than on rebates and fees. Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing to further generally increase the Post Liquidity credits for Customer order flow to attract such order flow to the Exchange. Although certain OTP Holders that send Customer orders that in the aggregate exceed 500,000 but not 800,000 contracts executed in a month will receive a slightly lower Post Liquidity credit than they currently do, other OTP Holders that previously did not qualify for the credit will qualify going forward. The Exchange believes that overall redistribution of the credits will in turn increase order flow to add liquidity on the Exchange and encourage greater participation by the largest market participants. With the anticipated increase in such order flow to the Exchange, the Exchange expects to attract additional order flow from Firms and Broker Dealers to trade with such order flow. The Exchange further believes that the proposed change is reasonable because other exchanges offer comparable tiers of credits for adding Customer liquidity in Penny Pilot issues.6 B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 6 See, e.g., Nasdaq Options Market pricing, available at https://nasdaqtrader.com/ Micro.aspx?id=OptionsPricing, and BATS BZX Exchange Fee Schedule, Effective January 3, 2012, available at https://batstrading.com/FeeSchedule/. PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 9289 Per contract rate on all posted liquidity ¥$0.28 ¥0.36 ¥0.42 ¥0.43 C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 7 of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 8 thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the NYSE Arca. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–NYSEArca–2012–12 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 7 15 8 17 E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 16FEN1 9290 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2012 / Notices Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEArca-2012–12. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR– NYSEArca–2012–12 and should be submitted on or before March 8, 2012. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.9 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–42 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on January 31, 2012, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by NASDAQ. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC proposes to amend NASDAQ Rule 3020 to reflect recent changes to a corresponding rule of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’). The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at https:// www.nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. [FR Doc. 2012–3613 Filed 2–15–12; 8:45 am] A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 1. Purpose SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [Release No. 34–66372; File No. SR– NASDAQ–2012–021] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Relating to Fidelity Bonds February 10, 2012. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Many of NASDAQ’s rules are based on rules of FINRA (formerly the National Association of Securities Dealers (‘‘NASD’’)). Beginning in 2008, FINRA embarked on an extended process of moving rules formerly designated as ‘‘NASD Rules’’ into a consolidated FINRA rulebook. In most cases, FINRA has renumbered these rules, and in some cases has substantively amended them. Accordingly, NASDAQ also has initiated a process of modifying its rulebook to ensure that NASDAQ rules corresponding to FINRA/NASD rules 1 15 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:31 Feb 15, 2012 2 17 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 continue to mirror them as closely as practicable. This proposed rule change concerns NASDAQ Rule 3020 entitled ‘‘Fidelity Bonds,’’ which follows and incorporates by reference former NASD Rule 3020.3 FINRA recently amended its rules to adopt former NASD Rule 3020, relating to Fidelity Bonds, with certain changes, into the consolidated FINRA rulebook as FINRA Rule 4360.4 NASDAQ Rule 3020 provides that ‘‘[a] member designated to Nasdaq for oversight pursuant to SEC Rule 17d–1 shall comply with NASD Rule 3020 as if such Rule were part of Nasdaq’s Rules.’’ The Exchange proposes to amend this text to reference new FINRA Rule 4360, which replaced NASD Rule 3020. NASD Rule 3020(a) generally provides that each member required to join the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (‘‘SIPC’’) that has employees and that is not a member in good standing of one of the enumerated national securities exchanges must maintain fidelity bond coverage. FINRA Rule 4360 requires each member that is required to join SIPC to maintain blanket fidelity bond coverage with specified amounts of coverage based on the member’s net capital requirement, with certain exceptions. NASD Rule 3020(a)(1) requires members to maintain a blanket fidelity bond in a form substantially similar to the standard form of Brokers Blanket Bond promulgated by the Surety Association of America. New FINRA Rule 4360 requires members to maintain fidelity bond coverage that provides for per loss coverage without an aggregate limit of liability. Also, pursuant to FINRA Rule 4360, a member’s fidelity bond must provide against loss and have Insuring Agreements covering at least the following: Fidelity, on premises, in transit, forgery and alteration, securities and counterfeit currency. The rule change modified the descriptive headings for these Insuring Agreements, in part, from NASD Rule 3020(a)(1) and NYSE Rule 319(d) to align them with the headings in the current bond forms available to broker-dealers. FINRA Rule 4360 also eliminates the specific coverage provisions in NASD Rule 3 The purpose of the fidelity bond is to protect a member against certain types of losses, including, but not limited to, those caused by the malfeasance of its officers and employees, and the effect of such losses on the member’s capital. 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63961 (February 24, 2011), 76 FR 11542 (March 2, 2011) (SR–FINRA–2010–059) (a rule change to adopt a rule of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) as part of the consolidation of the FINRA rulebook). This new rule took into account Incorporated NYSE Rule 319 (Fidelity Bonds) and its Interpretation. E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9288-9290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66377; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2012-12]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Implementing 
Changes to the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule Relating to Post 
Liquidity Credits

February 10, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that, on January 31, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE 
Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule 
(``Fee Schedule'') to increase the Post Liquidity credits on Customer 
posted electronic executions and to delete references to Royalty Fees 
for foreign currency options, which the Exchange no longer trades. The 
text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the 
Commission's Public Reference Room, and www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to increase the 
Post Liquidity credits on Customer posted electronic executions and to 
delete references to Royalty Fees for foreign currency options, which 
the Exchange no longer trades. The Exchange proposes to make the rule 
change operative on February 1, 2012.
Post Liquidity Credits
    Electronic transactions in Penny Pilot issues \3\ are assessed Take 
Liquidity fees and credited with Post Liquidity credits. Under the 
current Fee Schedule, the Post Liquidity credit is $0.25 per contract 
for Customers, $0.32 per contract for Lead Market Makers and Market 
Makers, and $0.10 per contract for Firms and Broker Dealers. OTP 
Holders that provide aggregated Customer posting volume in Penny Pilot 
issues that exceeds certain thresholds receive higher Post Liquidity 
credits on all Customer posted electronic executions. Specifically, an 
OTP Holder sending Customer orders that in the aggregate exceed 500,000 
contracts executed in a month from posting liquidity receives a Post 
Liquidity credit of $0.32 per contract on all executions resulting from 
posted liquidity. If such aggregated Customer orders exceed 800,000 
contracts executed in a month from posting liquidity, the OTP Holder 
receives a Post Liquidity credit of $0.34 per contract on all 
executions resulting from posted liquidity. If such aggregated Customer 
orders exceed 1,200,000 contracts executed in a month from posting 
liquidity, the OTP Holder receives a Post Liquidity credit of $0.38 per 
contract on all executions resulting from posted liquidity. The volume 
thresholds are intended to incentivize firms to route additional 
Customer orders to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Under NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.72, options on certain issues 
have been approved to trade in a minimum price variation of $0.01 as 
part of a pilot program that is scheduled to expire on June 30, 
2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend the volume thresholds for the Post 
Liquidity credits by lowering the initial volume threshold to qualify 
for the first level of higher Post Liquidity credits, generally raising 
the amount of the Post Liquidity

[[Page 9289]]

credits for the next two volume thresholds, and creating a new higher 
volume threshold that will pay a higher Post Liquidity credit than is 
currently offered. The Exchange notes, however, that under the proposed 
volume thresholds, an OTP Holder that sends Customer orders that in the 
aggregate exceed 500,000 but not 800,000 contracts executed in a month 
will receive a lower Post Liquidity credit of $0.28 per contract, which 
is lower than the $0.32 Post Liquidity credit under the current Fee 
Schedule. The Exchange believes that the overall redistribution of the 
credits will in turn increase order flow to add liquidity on the 
Exchange and encourage greater participation by the largest market 
participants. The proposed volume thresholds and Post Liquidity credits 
are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Monthly total
                                  customer contracts   Per contract rate
                                 executed from posted    on all posted
                                      liquidity            liquidity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Threshold 1...................  More than 350,000....             -$0.28
Threshold 2...................  More than 800,000....              -0.36
Threshold 3...................  More than 1,200,000..              -0.42
Threshold 4...................  More than 3,500,000..              -0.43
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Royalty Fees for Foreign Currency Options
    The current Fee Schedule sets forth Royalty Fees for certain 
foreign currency options. Because the Exchange no longer trades foreign 
currency options, it proposes to delete references to such Royalty 
Fees.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') 
\4\ in general and Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \5\ in particular because 
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable 
dues, fees, and other charges among its members and other persons using 
its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, 
issuers, brokers or dealers. The proposed change is equitably allocated 
and not unfairly discriminatory because it will apply uniformly to all 
similarly situated OTP Holders that direct Customer orders to the 
Exchange. The proposed fees also are equitably allocated and reasonable 
because they create an incrementally higher incentive for OTP Holders 
to bring additional liquidity to the Exchange, thereby contributing to 
price discovery and benefiting investors generally. Moreover, the 
difference between (1) the Post Liquidity credits received by OTP 
Holders that aggregate Customer orders, and (2) the Post Liquidity 
credit received by Firms and Broker Dealers is not inequitable or 
unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange believes that it has 
structured its Fee Schedule in a manner to attract order flow from all 
such entities. In this regard, the Exchange has found that the higher 
Post Liquidity credit for Firms and Broker Dealers has not caused them 
to send additional order flow to the Exchange. Based on its 
observations, the Exchange believes that such entities focus on the 
ability to trade with Customer order flow to capture the spread rather 
than on rebates and fees. Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing to 
further generally increase the Post Liquidity credits for Customer 
order flow to attract such order flow to the Exchange. Although certain 
OTP Holders that send Customer orders that in the aggregate exceed 
500,000 but not 800,000 contracts executed in a month will receive a 
slightly lower Post Liquidity credit than they currently do, other OTP 
Holders that previously did not qualify for the credit will qualify 
going forward. The Exchange believes that overall redistribution of the 
credits will in turn increase order flow to add liquidity on the 
Exchange and encourage greater participation by the largest market 
participants. With the anticipated increase in such order flow to the 
Exchange, the Exchange expects to attract additional order flow from 
Firms and Broker Dealers to trade with such order flow. The Exchange 
further believes that the proposed change is reasonable because other 
exchanges offer comparable tiers of credits for adding Customer 
liquidity in Penny Pilot issues.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \6\ See, e.g., Nasdaq Options Market pricing, available at 
https://nasdaqtrader.com/Micro.aspx?id=OptionsPricing, and BATS BZX 
Exchange Fee Schedule, Effective January 3, 2012, available at 
https://batstrading.com/FeeSchedule/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \7\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 \8\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the NYSE Arca.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2012-12 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary,

[[Page 9290]]

Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 
20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2012-12. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2012-12 and should 
be submitted on or before March 8, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-3613 Filed 2-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.