Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend EDGA Rule 1.5(q), 8928-8931 [2012-3470]
Download as PDF
8928
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2012 / Notices
Agency refuses to clear and settle the
trades of that Participant.
Additionally, the Commission
believes that Article 13, Rule 2(c) and
Interpretation and Policy .01 to Article
13, Rule 2 provide fair suspension
appeal procedures, and therefore is
consistent with Section 6(b)(7) of the
Act,7 which requires that the rules of a
national securities exchange provide a
fair procedure for the disciplining of
members and persons associated with
members. The Commission notes that,
where an officer of the Exchange
suspends a Participant’s trading
privileges under the narrow
circumstances described in
Interpretation and Policy .01, the
suspension will be lifted automatically
within two days of the action unless the
CRO approves it, and the CRO may
decide to lift the suspension earlier.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the
proposed rule change (SR–CHX–2011–
34) be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–3472 Filed 2–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–66363; File No. SR–EDGA–
2012–04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend EDGA Rule
1.5(q)
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
February 9, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
1, 2012, the EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘SEC’’ and the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
7 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
8 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Feb 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
EDGA Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’), proposes to amend its
rules regarding registration,
qualification and continuing education
requirements for Authorized Traders of
Members that engage solely in
proprietary trading. EDGA proposes to
amend Rules 2.3 and 11.4 and the
Interpretations to Rule 2.5 to recognize
a new category of limited representative
registration for proprietary traders. The
Exchange proposes to expand its
registration requirements to include the
Proprietary Traders Qualification
Examination (‘‘Series 56’’) as one of the
applicable qualification examinations as
determined by the Exchange. The
Exchange also proposes to permit
Authorized Traders of Members who
engage solely in proprietary trading to
obtain the Series 56 license in order to
effect transactions on the Exchange. In
addition, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 2.3 to make it substantially
similar to the rules of the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority
(‘‘FINRA’’) and other Self-Regulatory
Organizations (‘‘SROs’’) to require
Members to register two registered
Principals.3 The text of the proposed
Proprietary Traders Qualification
Examination Content Outline is
attached as Exhibit 3 and the text of the
proposed rule changes is attached as
Exhibit 5.4 These documents are
available on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s
principal office, and at the Public
Reference Room of the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
3 The Exchange notes that it will continue to
require per Exchange Rule 2.3(c) that all Authorized
Traders who are to function as Principals on the
Exchange to be registered consistent with amended
paragraph (c)(2) of Rule 2.3.
4 The Commission notes that the Outline and the
text of the proposed rule change are attached to the
filing, not to this Notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Purpose
Background
In July 2011, NASDAQ filed a
proposed rule change with the
Commission to recognize a new category
of limited representative registration for
proprietary traders.5 In addition, in
August 2011, NASDAQ filed a related
proposed rule change to use the content
outline for the Series 56 examination
that would be applicable to proprietary
traders.6
For the purposes of this category of
limited representative registration,
NASDAQ Rule 1011(o) defines a
proprietary trading firm as a firm that
embodies the following characteristics:
The Member is not required by Section
15(b)(8) of the Exchange Act (the ‘‘Act’’)
to become a FINRA member but is a
member of another registered securities
exchange not registered solely under
Section 6(g) of the Act; all funds used
or proposed to be used by the Member
for trading are the Member’s own
capital, traded through the Member’s
own accounts; the Member does not,
and will not have ‘‘customers’’; 7 all
Principals and Authorized Traders of
the Member acting or to be acting in the
capacity of a trader must be owners of,
employees of, or contractors to the
Member. In addition, NASDAQ Rule
1032(c) defines a proprietary trader as
an Authorized Trader whose activities
in the investment banking or securities
business are limited solely to
proprietary trading; passes an
appropriate qualification examination;
and is an associated person of a
proprietary trading firm as defined in
NASDAQ Rule 1011(o). NASDAQ Rule
1032(c) identifies the Series 56 as the
appropriate qualification examination
for proprietary traders’ limited
representative registration. Furthermore,
NASDAQ’s proposed category of limited
representative registration expressly
excludes those associated persons that
deal with the public and states those
associated persons should continue to
5 See Securities Exchange [sic] Release No. 64958
(July 25, 2011), 76 FR 45629 (July 29, 2011) (SR–
NASDAQ–2011–095). See also Securities Exchange
[sic] Release No. 65041 (August 5, 2011), 76 FR
49822 (August 11, 2011) (SR–NASDAQ–2011–107).
6 See Securities Exchange [sic] Release No. 65040
(August 5, 2011), 76 FR 49809 (August 11, 2011)
(SR–NASDAQ–2011–108).
7 NASDAQ Rule 0120(g) states, ‘‘the term
customer shall not include a broker or dealer.’’
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2012 / Notices
register as General Securities
Representatives after obtaining the
Series 7 license.
NASDAQ worked with FINRA and
certain other exchanges, many of which
have recently enhanced their
registration requirements to require the
registration of associated persons,8 to
develop the content outline and
qualification examination for
proprietary traders. The Series 56
examination program is shared by
NASDAQ and the following SROs:
Boston Options Exchange, C2 Options
Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated
(‘‘CBOE’’); Chicago Stock Exchange,
Incorporated; International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘ISE’’); NASDAQ OMX
BX, Inc.; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC;
National Stock Exchange, Incorporated;
New York Stock Exchange, LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’); NYSE AMEX, Incorporated;
and NYSE ARCA, Incorporated.
Members of FINRA, NASDAQ and the
SROs referenced above developed
criteria for the Series 56 examination
program, which CBOE filed with the
SEC on June 17, 2011.9
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Adoption of Series 56 by the Exchange
The Exchange believes the Series 56
will assist the Exchange in ensuring it
has proper registration, qualification
and continuing education requirements
for associated persons of Members
because the Series 56 examination was
designed to test a candidate’s
knowledge of proprietary trading in
general and the industry rules
applicable to trading of equity securities
and listed options contracts. The Series
56 examination covers, among other
things, recordkeeping and recording
requirements, types and characteristics
of securities and investments, trading
practices and display execution and
trading systems. While the Series 56
examination is primarily dedicated to
topics related to proprietary trading, the
Series 56 examination also covers some
general concepts relating to customers.
The qualification examination
consists of 100 multiple choice
questions. Candidates have 150 minutes
to complete the exam. The content
outline, which the Exchange attached as
Exhibit 3,10 describes the following
topical sections comprising the
examination: Personnel, Business
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63843
(February 4, 2011), 76 FR 7884 (February 11, 2011)
(SR–ISE–2011–155); and 63314 (November 12,
2010), 75 FR 70957 (November 9, 2010) (SR–CBOE–
2010–084).
9 See supra note 3. See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 64699 (June 17, 2011), 76 FR 36945
(June 23, 2011) (SR–CBOE–2011–056).
10 See note 4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Feb 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
Conduct and Recordkeeping and
Reporting Requirements, 9 questions;
Markets, Market Participants, Exchanges
and SROs, 8 questions; Types and
Characteristics of Securities and
Investments, 20 questions; Trading
Practices and Prohibited Acts, 50
questions; and Display, Execution, and
Trading Systems, 13 questions.
Representatives from the SROs
mentioned above also intend to meet on
a periodic basis to evaluate and update,
as necessary, the Series 56 examination
program.
In addition, NASDAQ and some other
SROs have filed or will file similar
proposals with the Commission to
amend current rules to recognize a new
category of limited representative
registration for proprietary traders and
to permit members engaged solely in
proprietary trading to obtain the Series
56 license in order to effect trades on
the applicable exchanges.11 The
Exchange proposes to implement the
Series 56 examination program upon
availability in FINRA’s Web CRD®
system,12 notification to its Members
and subject to the satisfaction of
applicable continuing education
requirements, as described in
Interpretations .04 and .05 to Rule 2.5.
The Exchange believes that
acceptance of the Series 56 qualification
examination will benefit both the
Exchange and the applicable proprietary
traders affected by the proposal.
Accordingly, pursuant to the amended
rules, as proposed, the Exchange would
recognize a new category of limited
representative registration for
proprietary traders. In addition, the
Exchange would expand its registration,
qualification and continuing education
requirements to include the Series 56
examination as one of the applicable
qualification examinations as
determined by the Exchange. The
Exchange would also permit Authorized
Traders of Members who engage solely
in proprietary trading to obtain the
Series 56 license in order to effect
transactions on the Exchange. The
Exchange proposes to add Interpretation
.06 to Rule 2.5 to incorporate the Series
56 qualification examination as a
limited representative registration for
proprietary traders, and proposes to
identify the characteristics required to
satisfy the Exchange’s definition of a
proprietary trading firm and a
proprietary trader, which are modeled
after NASDAQ’s rules, as discussed
above.
11 See
supra notes 2, 3, 5 and 6.
www.finra.org/Industry/Compliance/
Registration/CRD/
12 See
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8929
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 2.3(c)(2) to make it
substantially similar to the rules of
FINRA and other SROs to require
Members to register at least two
registered Principals.13 The proposed
amendment applies to firms seeking
admission as Members and existing
Members, and states that each Member,
except a sole proprietorship or a
proprietary trading firm with 25 or
fewer Authorized Traders (‘‘Limited
Size Proprietary Firm’’),14 shall have at
least two officers or partners who are
registered as Principals with respect to
the Member’s equities securities
business and, at a minimum, one such
Principal shall be the Member’s Chief
Compliance Officer (‘‘CCO’’).15
The Exchange proposes additional
amendments to Rule 2.3(c)(3) and (4) to
require Members to register a CCO and
a Financial/Operations Principal
(‘‘FINOP’’) in order to make the
Exchange’s rules substantially similar to
the rules of FINRA and other SROs. In
addition, this more accurately reflects
the heightened level of accountability
inherent in the duty of overseeing
compliance by a Member of the
Exchange, and in the oversight and
preparation of financial reports and the
oversight of those employed in financial
and operational capacities at each
Member firm. The proposed
amendments state each Member shall
designate a CCO on the Schedule A of
Form BD, and requires the individual
designated as a CCO to register with the
Exchange and pass the General
Securities Principal Examination (Series
24). Similarly, the proposed
amendments to Rule 2.3 require each
Member subject to Rule 15c3–1 of the
Act to designate a FINOP, and requires
the individual designated as a FINOP to
successfully complete the Financial and
Operations Principal Examination
(Series 27), and register in that capacity
with the Exchange as prescribed by the
Exchange.
The Exchange proposes to make other
ministerial amendments to Rule 2.3 to
accommodate the placement of the
proposed amendments outlined in this
rule filing.
13 The Exchange proposes to communicate this
amendment to Members by publishing an
Information Circular on the Exchange’s Web site.
Existing Members shall receive additional time to
satisfy this requirement.
14 The Exchange proposes to create an exception
to Rule 2.3(c)(2) where a Limited Size Proprietary
Firm must register at least one Principal with the
Exchange. In addition, the Exchange may waive the
two Principal requirement in situations that
indicate conclusively that only one Principal
associated with the Member should be required.
15 The Commission notes that EDGA is an equities
exchange.
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
8930
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2012 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,16 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(c)(3)(B) of the
Act.17 Under that section, it is the
Exchange’s responsibility to prescribe
standards of training, experience, and
competence for Exchange Members and
their associated persons, in particular,
by offering an alternative qualification
examination for proprietary traders that
more closely reflects the practical
knowledge that is a pre-requisite to
proprietary trading. Pursuant to this
statutory obligation, the Exchange
requests to recognize a new category of
limited representative registration for
proprietary traders and to permit
Authorized Traders of Members who
engage solely in proprietary trading to
obtain the Series 56 license. The
Exchange believes the Series 56
examination establishes that Authorized
Traders of Members have attained
specified levels of competence and
knowledge generally applicable to
proprietary trading.
The Exchange believes that the
requirement that persons functioning in
certain supervisory capacities, including
CCO and a FINOP, be registered through
the WebCRD® system and be subject to
higher qualification standards
appropriately reflects the enhanced
responsibility of their roles and is
consistent with the Act. The general
requirement that Members must have a
minimum of two Principals responsible
for oversight of Member organization
activity, who must be registered as such
and pass a principal exam, should help
the Exchange strengthen the regulation
of its Member firms, and prepare those
individuals for their responsibilities.
The nature of the firm, however, may
dictate that more than two Principals
are needed to provide appropriate
supervision. In addition, the
requirement for each Member to have a
CCO who must register and pass the
Series 24 exam and a FINOP who must
register and pass the Series 27 exam is
appropriate based on the heightened
level of accountability inherent in the
duty of overseeing compliance by a
Member of the Exchange, and in the
oversight and preparation of financial
reports and the oversight of those
employed in financial and operational
capacities at each Member firm.
The Exchange believes that this
proposal will enhance its ability to
ensure an effective supervisory structure
for those conducting business on the
U.S.C. 78f(b).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(c)(3)(B).
Exchange. The requirements apply
broadly and are intended to help close
a regulatory gap which has resulted in
varying registration, qualification, and
supervision requirements across
markets. The Exchange believes that the
changes proposed to its rules will
strengthen its regulatory structure and
should enhance the ability of its
Authorized Traders and Members to
comply with the Exchange’s rules as
well as with the federal securities laws.
In addition, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the principles of Section
11A(a)(1)(C)(ii) of the Act in that it seeks
to assure fair competition among
brokers and dealers and among
exchange markets. The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule will
promote uniformity of regulation across
markets, thus reducing opportunities for
regulatory arbitrage. EDGA’s proposed
rule change helps ensure that all
persons conducting a securities business
through EDGA are appropriately
supervised, as the Commission expects
of all SROs.
The proposed changes are also
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,18 because they would promote just
and equitable principles of trade,
remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, protect investors and the public
interest, by enabling such persons to
qualify for registration with the
Exchange by offering an alternative
qualification examination that
specifically addresses industry topics
that establish the foundation for the
regulatory and procedural knowledge
necessary for such persons electing to
register as Proprietary Traders.
Similarly, including new requirements
for Members to maintain at least two
Principals, a CCO and a FINOP,
harmonizes the Exchange’s rules with
substantially similar rules of FINRA and
other SROs. Accordingly, the
modifications to EDGA Rules 2.3 and
11.4 and the Interpretations to Rule 2.5
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanism of, a free and
open market and a national market
system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
16 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Feb 14, 2012
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has designated this rule
filing as non-controversial under
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 19 and
paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.20 The Exchange asserts that
the proposed rule changes: (1) Will not
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (2) will
not impose any significant burden on
competition; (3) and will not become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate. In
addition, the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule changes,
along with a brief description and text
of the proposed rule changes, at least
five business days prior to the date of
filing.21 For the foregoing reasons, this
rule filing qualifies for immediate
effectiveness as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’
rule change under paragraph (f)(6) of
Rule 19b–4 because the Series 56
qualification examination has been
adopted or will be adopted for use by
NASDAQ and other SROs. The Series 56
examination also reflects a collaborative
effort to adopt an appropriate
qualification examination for a new
registration category. In addition, the
Exchange’s proposal to include new
requirements for Members to maintain
at least two Principals, a CCO and a
FINOP, harmonizes the Exchange’s rules
with substantially similar rules of
FINRA and other SROs.
The rule changes as proposed will
allow the Exchange to recognize a new
category of limited representative
registration for proprietary traders. The
Exchange believes that Authorized
Traders of Members who engage solely
in proprietary trading, obtain the Series
56 license, and wish to register with
EDGA would be disadvantaged by
having to wait for the proposed rule
changes to become operative.
Accordingly, because the Exchange
believes that implementation of the
standards proposed in this filing is
19 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4.
21 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
20 17
18 15
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2012 / Notices
important to its maintenance of a fair
and orderly market and is noncontroversial, the Exchange requested
that the Commission waive the 30-day
pre-operative waiting period contained
in Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.22
Waiver of this requirement will allow
the Exchange to make the examination
available as soon as possible to coincide
with its availability on other exchanges.
The Commission believes that waiver of
the 30-day operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest because the proposal
makes the registration, qualification and
continuing education requirements of
EDGA comparable to those of the other
exchanges and will enable EDGA to
recognize the Series 56 exam as a valid
qualification for proprietary traders.23
Therefore, the Commission designates
the proposal operative upon filing.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend the rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
Internet Web site https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–EDGA–
2012–04 and should be submitted by
March 7, 2012.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml; or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–EDGA–2012–04 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGA–2012–04. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
22 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
23 For
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Feb 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
[FR Doc. 2012–3470 Filed 2–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–66362; File No. SR–Phlx–
2012–13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Exchange Rule 705 (Fidelity Bonds)
February 9, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1, and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that on January
26, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II
and III, below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
24 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 705, entitled ‘‘Members
Must Carry,’’ to create new requirements
regarding fidelity bonds and also
rename the Rule ‘‘Fidelity Bonds.’’
The Exchange intends for this Rule to
become operative on April 2, 2012.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries,
which are substantially set forth below
in sections A, B, and C, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 705, entitled ‘‘Members
Must Carry,’’ to create new requirements
regarding fidelity bonds and also
rename the Rule ‘‘Fidelity Bonds,’’ in
substantially the same form as a rule at
the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’).3
Currently, Exchange Rule 705 requires
each member organization that is a
partnership and is doing business with
the public and each member
organization that is a corporation to
carry fidelity bonds covering its general
partners and employees or covering its
officers and employees in such form and
in such amounts as the Exchange may
require. The Rule does not apply to
member organizations that are
partnerships or corporations which are
members of another exchange, which
has comparable rules and regulations to
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8931
3 See
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
FINRA Rule 4360 ‘‘Fidelity Bonds.’’
15FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8928-8931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3470]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-66363; File No. SR-EDGA-2012-04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
EDGA Rule 1.5(q)
February 9, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 1, 2012, the EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``SEC'' and the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA'' or the ``Exchange''), proposes to
amend its rules regarding registration, qualification and continuing
education requirements for Authorized Traders of Members that engage
solely in proprietary trading. EDGA proposes to amend Rules 2.3 and
11.4 and the Interpretations to Rule 2.5 to recognize a new category of
limited representative registration for proprietary traders. The
Exchange proposes to expand its registration requirements to include
the Proprietary Traders Qualification Examination (``Series 56'') as
one of the applicable qualification examinations as determined by the
Exchange. The Exchange also proposes to permit Authorized Traders of
Members who engage solely in proprietary trading to obtain the Series
56 license in order to effect transactions on the Exchange. In
addition, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 2.3 to make it
substantially similar to the rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (``FINRA'') and other Self-Regulatory Organizations
(``SROs'') to require Members to register two registered Principals.\3\
The text of the proposed Proprietary Traders Qualification Examination
Content Outline is attached as Exhibit 3 and the text of the proposed
rule changes is attached as Exhibit 5.\4\ These documents are available
on the Exchange's Web site at www.directedge.com, at the Exchange's
principal office, and at the Public Reference Room of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange notes that it will continue to require per
Exchange Rule 2.3(c) that all Authorized Traders who are to function
as Principals on the Exchange to be registered consistent with
amended paragraph (c)(2) of Rule 2.3.
\4\ The Commission notes that the Outline and the text of the
proposed rule change are attached to the filing, not to this Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Background
In July 2011, NASDAQ filed a proposed rule change with the
Commission to recognize a new category of limited representative
registration for proprietary traders.\5\ In addition, in August 2011,
NASDAQ filed a related proposed rule change to use the content outline
for the Series 56 examination that would be applicable to proprietary
traders.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange [sic] Release No. 64958 (July 25,
2011), 76 FR 45629 (July 29, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-095). See also
Securities Exchange [sic] Release No. 65041 (August 5, 2011), 76 FR
49822 (August 11, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-107).
\6\ See Securities Exchange [sic] Release No. 65040 (August 5,
2011), 76 FR 49809 (August 11, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-108).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the purposes of this category of limited representative
registration, NASDAQ Rule 1011(o) defines a proprietary trading firm as
a firm that embodies the following characteristics: The Member is not
required by Section 15(b)(8) of the Exchange Act (the ``Act'') to
become a FINRA member but is a member of another registered securities
exchange not registered solely under Section 6(g) of the Act; all funds
used or proposed to be used by the Member for trading are the Member's
own capital, traded through the Member's own accounts; the Member does
not, and will not have ``customers''; \7\ all Principals and Authorized
Traders of the Member acting or to be acting in the capacity of a
trader must be owners of, employees of, or contractors to the Member.
In addition, NASDAQ Rule 1032(c) defines a proprietary trader as an
Authorized Trader whose activities in the investment banking or
securities business are limited solely to proprietary trading; passes
an appropriate qualification examination; and is an associated person
of a proprietary trading firm as defined in NASDAQ Rule 1011(o). NASDAQ
Rule 1032(c) identifies the Series 56 as the appropriate qualification
examination for proprietary traders' limited representative
registration. Furthermore, NASDAQ's proposed category of limited
representative registration expressly excludes those associated persons
that deal with the public and states those associated persons should
continue to
[[Page 8929]]
register as General Securities Representatives after obtaining the
Series 7 license.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ NASDAQ Rule 0120(g) states, ``the term customer shall not
include a broker or dealer.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASDAQ worked with FINRA and certain other exchanges, many of which
have recently enhanced their registration requirements to require the
registration of associated persons,\8\ to develop the content outline
and qualification examination for proprietary traders. The Series 56
examination program is shared by NASDAQ and the following SROs: Boston
Options Exchange, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE''); Chicago Stock Exchange,
Incorporated; International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE''); NASDAQ
OMX BX, Inc.; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; National Stock Exchange,
Incorporated; New York Stock Exchange, LLC (``NYSE''); NYSE AMEX,
Incorporated; and NYSE ARCA, Incorporated. Members of FINRA, NASDAQ and
the SROs referenced above developed criteria for the Series 56
examination program, which CBOE filed with the SEC on June 17, 2011.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63843 (February 4,
2011), 76 FR 7884 (February 11, 2011) (SR-ISE-2011-155); and 63314
(November 12, 2010), 75 FR 70957 (November 9, 2010) (SR-CBOE-2010-
084).
\9\ See supra note 3. See also Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 64699 (June 17, 2011), 76 FR 36945 (June 23, 2011) (SR-CBOE-
2011-056).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adoption of Series 56 by the Exchange
The Exchange believes the Series 56 will assist the Exchange in
ensuring it has proper registration, qualification and continuing
education requirements for associated persons of Members because the
Series 56 examination was designed to test a candidate's knowledge of
proprietary trading in general and the industry rules applicable to
trading of equity securities and listed options contracts. The Series
56 examination covers, among other things, recordkeeping and recording
requirements, types and characteristics of securities and investments,
trading practices and display execution and trading systems. While the
Series 56 examination is primarily dedicated to topics related to
proprietary trading, the Series 56 examination also covers some general
concepts relating to customers.
The qualification examination consists of 100 multiple choice
questions. Candidates have 150 minutes to complete the exam. The
content outline, which the Exchange attached as Exhibit 3,\10\
describes the following topical sections comprising the examination:
Personnel, Business Conduct and Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements, 9 questions; Markets, Market Participants, Exchanges and
SROs, 8 questions; Types and Characteristics of Securities and
Investments, 20 questions; Trading Practices and Prohibited Acts, 50
questions; and Display, Execution, and Trading Systems, 13 questions.
Representatives from the SROs mentioned above also intend to meet on a
periodic basis to evaluate and update, as necessary, the Series 56
examination program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, NASDAQ and some other SROs have filed or will file
similar proposals with the Commission to amend current rules to
recognize a new category of limited representative registration for
proprietary traders and to permit members engaged solely in proprietary
trading to obtain the Series 56 license in order to effect trades on
the applicable exchanges.\11\ The Exchange proposes to implement the
Series 56 examination program upon availability in FINRA's Web
CRD[supreg] system,\12\ notification to its Members and subject to the
satisfaction of applicable continuing education requirements, as
described in Interpretations .04 and .05 to Rule 2.5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See supra notes 2, 3, 5 and 6.
\12\ See www.finra.org/Industry/Compliance/Registration/CRD/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that acceptance of the Series 56
qualification examination will benefit both the Exchange and the
applicable proprietary traders affected by the proposal. Accordingly,
pursuant to the amended rules, as proposed, the Exchange would
recognize a new category of limited representative registration for
proprietary traders. In addition, the Exchange would expand its
registration, qualification and continuing education requirements to
include the Series 56 examination as one of the applicable
qualification examinations as determined by the Exchange. The Exchange
would also permit Authorized Traders of Members who engage solely in
proprietary trading to obtain the Series 56 license in order to effect
transactions on the Exchange. The Exchange proposes to add
Interpretation .06 to Rule 2.5 to incorporate the Series 56
qualification examination as a limited representative registration for
proprietary traders, and proposes to identify the characteristics
required to satisfy the Exchange's definition of a proprietary trading
firm and a proprietary trader, which are modeled after NASDAQ's rules,
as discussed above.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 2.3(c)(2) to make
it substantially similar to the rules of FINRA and other SROs to
require Members to register at least two registered Principals.\13\ The
proposed amendment applies to firms seeking admission as Members and
existing Members, and states that each Member, except a sole
proprietorship or a proprietary trading firm with 25 or fewer
Authorized Traders (``Limited Size Proprietary Firm''),\14\ shall have
at least two officers or partners who are registered as Principals with
respect to the Member's equities securities business and, at a minimum,
one such Principal shall be the Member's Chief Compliance Officer
(``CCO'').\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Exchange proposes to communicate this amendment to
Members by publishing an Information Circular on the Exchange's Web
site. Existing Members shall receive additional time to satisfy this
requirement.
\14\ The Exchange proposes to create an exception to Rule
2.3(c)(2) where a Limited Size Proprietary Firm must register at
least one Principal with the Exchange. In addition, the Exchange may
waive the two Principal requirement in situations that indicate
conclusively that only one Principal associated with the Member
should be required.
\15\ The Commission notes that EDGA is an equities exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes additional amendments to Rule 2.3(c)(3) and
(4) to require Members to register a CCO and a Financial/Operations
Principal (``FINOP'') in order to make the Exchange's rules
substantially similar to the rules of FINRA and other SROs. In
addition, this more accurately reflects the heightened level of
accountability inherent in the duty of overseeing compliance by a
Member of the Exchange, and in the oversight and preparation of
financial reports and the oversight of those employed in financial and
operational capacities at each Member firm. The proposed amendments
state each Member shall designate a CCO on the Schedule A of Form BD,
and requires the individual designated as a CCO to register with the
Exchange and pass the General Securities Principal Examination (Series
24). Similarly, the proposed amendments to Rule 2.3 require each Member
subject to Rule 15c3-1 of the Act to designate a FINOP, and requires
the individual designated as a FINOP to successfully complete the
Financial and Operations Principal Examination (Series 27), and
register in that capacity with the Exchange as prescribed by the
Exchange.
The Exchange proposes to make other ministerial amendments to Rule
2.3 to accommodate the placement of the proposed amendments outlined in
this rule filing.
[[Page 8930]]
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\16\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(c)(3)(B) of the Act.\17\ Under that section, it is the Exchange's
responsibility to prescribe standards of training, experience, and
competence for Exchange Members and their associated persons, in
particular, by offering an alternative qualification examination for
proprietary traders that more closely reflects the practical knowledge
that is a pre-requisite to proprietary trading. Pursuant to this
statutory obligation, the Exchange requests to recognize a new category
of limited representative registration for proprietary traders and to
permit Authorized Traders of Members who engage solely in proprietary
trading to obtain the Series 56 license. The Exchange believes the
Series 56 examination establishes that Authorized Traders of Members
have attained specified levels of competence and knowledge generally
applicable to proprietary trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(c)(3)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the requirement that persons functioning
in certain supervisory capacities, including CCO and a FINOP, be
registered through the WebCRD[supreg] system and be subject to higher
qualification standards appropriately reflects the enhanced
responsibility of their roles and is consistent with the Act. The
general requirement that Members must have a minimum of two Principals
responsible for oversight of Member organization activity, who must be
registered as such and pass a principal exam, should help the Exchange
strengthen the regulation of its Member firms, and prepare those
individuals for their responsibilities. The nature of the firm,
however, may dictate that more than two Principals are needed to
provide appropriate supervision. In addition, the requirement for each
Member to have a CCO who must register and pass the Series 24 exam and
a FINOP who must register and pass the Series 27 exam is appropriate
based on the heightened level of accountability inherent in the duty of
overseeing compliance by a Member of the Exchange, and in the oversight
and preparation of financial reports and the oversight of those
employed in financial and operational capacities at each Member firm.
The Exchange believes that this proposal will enhance its ability
to ensure an effective supervisory structure for those conducting
business on the Exchange. The requirements apply broadly and are
intended to help close a regulatory gap which has resulted in varying
registration, qualification, and supervision requirements across
markets. The Exchange believes that the changes proposed to its rules
will strengthen its regulatory structure and should enhance the ability
of its Authorized Traders and Members to comply with the Exchange's
rules as well as with the federal securities laws.
In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the principles of Section 11A(a)(1)(C)(ii) of the Act
in that it seeks to assure fair competition among brokers and dealers
and among exchange markets. The Exchange believes that the proposed
rule will promote uniformity of regulation across markets, thus
reducing opportunities for regulatory arbitrage. EDGA's proposed rule
change helps ensure that all persons conducting a securities business
through EDGA are appropriately supervised, as the Commission expects of
all SROs.
The proposed changes are also consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,\18\ because they would promote just and equitable principles
of trade, remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free
and open market and a national market system, and, in general, protect
investors and the public interest, by enabling such persons to qualify
for registration with the Exchange by offering an alternative
qualification examination that specifically addresses industry topics
that establish the foundation for the regulatory and procedural
knowledge necessary for such persons electing to register as
Proprietary Traders. Similarly, including new requirements for Members
to maintain at least two Principals, a CCO and a FINOP, harmonizes the
Exchange's rules with substantially similar rules of FINRA and other
SROs. Accordingly, the modifications to EDGA Rules 2.3 and 11.4 and the
Interpretations to Rule 2.5 promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and
open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has designated this rule filing as non-controversial
under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \19\ and paragraph (f)(6) of Rule
19b-4 thereunder.\20\ The Exchange asserts that the proposed rule
changes: (1) Will not significantly affect the protection of investors
or the public interest; (2) will not impose any significant burden on
competition; (3) and will not become operative for 30 days from the
date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate. In addition, the Exchange provided the Commission with
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule changes, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule changes, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing.\21\ For the
foregoing reasons, this rule filing qualifies for immediate
effectiveness as a ``noncontroversial'' rule change under paragraph
(f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 because the Series 56 qualification examination
has been adopted or will be adopted for use by NASDAQ and other SROs.
The Series 56 examination also reflects a collaborative effort to adopt
an appropriate qualification examination for a new registration
category. In addition, the Exchange's proposal to include new
requirements for Members to maintain at least two Principals, a CCO and
a FINOP, harmonizes the Exchange's rules with substantially similar
rules of FINRA and other SROs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The rule changes as proposed will allow the Exchange to recognize a
new category of limited representative registration for proprietary
traders. The Exchange believes that Authorized Traders of Members who
engage solely in proprietary trading, obtain the Series 56 license, and
wish to register with EDGA would be disadvantaged by having to wait for
the proposed rule changes to become operative. Accordingly, because the
Exchange believes that implementation of the standards proposed in this
filing is
[[Page 8931]]
important to its maintenance of a fair and orderly market and is non-
controversial, the Exchange requested that the Commission waive the 30-
day pre-operative waiting period contained in Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
under the Act.\22\ Waiver of this requirement will allow the Exchange
to make the examination available as soon as possible to coincide with
its availability on other exchanges. The Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest because the proposal makes the
registration, qualification and continuing education requirements of
EDGA comparable to those of the other exchanges and will enable EDGA to
recognize the Series 56 exam as a valid qualification for proprietary
traders.\23\ Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal
operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\23\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml; or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-EDGA-2012-04 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGA-2012-04. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-EDGA-2012-04 and should be submitted by
March 7, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-3470 Filed 2-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P