Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 8282-8284 [2012-3322]

Download as PDF 8282 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of January 9, 2012 through January 13, 2012. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site at tradeact/taa/ taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 888– 365–6822. Dated: January 23, 2012. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2012–3323 Filed 2–13–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of January 16, 2012 through January 20, 2012. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the Following Must Be Satisfied (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:57 Feb 13, 2012 Jkt 226001 States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) All of the Following Must Be Satisfied (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact 8283 date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 80,443 ......... 80,487 ......... Olympic Panel Products LLC ............................................................... Stimson Lumber Company, Arden Division ......................................... Shelton, WA .................................. Colville, WA ................................... 81,039 ......... HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Henredon Plant 10, Furniture Brands International, Furniture Brands Resource. HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Henredon/Maitland, Furniture Brands International, Furniture Brands Resource. Workforce Carolina Working On-Site, at HDM Furniture Industries, Inc. The Personnel Center, Inc. and Onin Staffing, Working On-Site at HDM Furniture Industries, Inc. High Cotton Enterprises, Inc. ............................................................... Matrix IV Inc., The Agency Staffing ...................................................... 1SolTech, Inc. ....................................................................................... American Axle & Mfg. (AAM), Detroit Manufacturing Complex (DMC) MSX International, American Axle & Mfg., Detroit Manufacturing Complex, Detroit Manufacturing. Mt. Airy, NC .................................. December 13, 2010. September 27, 2010. April 16, 2011. High Point, NC .............................. March 31, 2011. Mt. Airy, NC .................................. February 13, 2010. High Point, NC .............................. February 13, 2010. Fort Payne, AL .............................. Woodstock, IL ............................... Farmers Branch, TX ..................... Detroit, MI ..................................... Detroit, MI ..................................... February 13, 2010. February 13, 2010. February 13, 2010. November 25, 2010. February 13, 2010. 81,039A ....... 81,039B ....... 81,039C ....... 81,054 ......... 81,118 ......... 81,125 ......... 81,207 ......... 81,207A ....... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 80,448 ......... Hampton Lumber Mills, Randle Division .............................................. Randle, WA ................................... 81,024 ......... Atmel Corporation, Colorado Springs, Colorado Division, Planning and Assembly Groups. HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Drexel Heritage Plant 75, Furniture Brands International. HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Drexel Heritage Plant 60, Furniture Brands International. Friday Staffing Services Working On-Site at Drexel Heritage, Plant 60 and Drexel Heritage Plant 75, HDM Furniture Industries, Inc. Wellpoint, Inc., Credentialing: CDO and CPC Division, Aerotek, Kelly Services, etc. Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services, Inc., Global Quality Assurance Department. CQMS Razer, Jean Simpson Personnel Services, Inc. ....................... The Seydel Companies, Seydel-Woolley & Co., Inc. Division, Spherion Staffing, LLC. Heartland Bakery Company, LLC, Maplehurst Bakeries, LLC, Selectremedy. Sunpower Corporation, Systems, Pluto Acquisition Co., LLC., Aerotek, Bayside Solutions, Robert Half, etc. Bristol, Inc., A Business Unit of Emerson Electric Co, dba Emerson Process, etc. American Axle & Manufacturing (AAM), Metal Forming Division ........ Colorado Springs, CO ................... September 14, 2010. February 13, 2010. Morganton, NC .............................. January 24, 2011. Morganton, NC .............................. January 24, 2011. Lenoir, NC ..................................... February 13, 2010. Andover, MA ................................. February 13, 2010. Amherst, NY .................................. February 13, 2010. Mansfield, LA ................................ Pendergrass, GA .......................... February 13, 2010. February 13, 2010. Du Quoin, IL .................................. February 13, 2010. Richmond, CA ............................... February 13, 2010. Watertown, CT .............................. August 19, 2011. Cheektowaga, NY ......................... July 18, 2010. 81,040 ......... 81,040A ....... 81,040B ....... 81,137 ......... 81,140 ......... 81,149 ......... 81,171 ......... 81,177 ......... 81,178 ......... 81,191 ......... mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 81,208 ......... VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:57 Feb 13, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1 Impact date 8284 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of January 16, 2012 through January 20, 2012. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 888–365–6822. Dated: January 25, 2012. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2012–3322 Filed 2–13–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–72,949] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Hard Drive Development Engineering Group Irvine (Formerly at Lake Forest), CA; Notice of Negative Determination on Remand On November 22, 2011, the U. S. Court of International Trade (USCIT) granted the Department of Labor’s second request for voluntary remand to conduct further investigation in Former Employees of Western Digital Technologies, Inc. v. United States Secretary of Labor (Court No. 11– 00085). On November 25, 2009, former workers of Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Hard Drive Development Engineering Group, Lake Forest, California (subject firm) filed a petition for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) on behalf of workers at the subject firm. AR 1. The worker group covered under this petition (subject worker group) consists of workers engaged in the supply of engineering functions for the development of hard disk drives. The initial investigation revealed that the subject firm had not shifted abroad the supply of services like or directly competitive with those provided by the subject worker group, that the subject firm had not acquired such services from abroad, and there had not been an increase in imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with those produced or supplied by the subject firm. AR 72–77. Further, the initial investigation revealed that the subject firm could not be considered a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a worker group eligible to apply for TAA. AR 72–77. On VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:57 Feb 13, 2012 Jkt 226001 August 5, 2010, the Department of Labor (Department) issued a Negative Determination regarding eligibility to apply for TAA applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The Department’s Notice of Negative Determination was published in the Federal Register on August 23, 2010 (75 FR 51849). AR 82. The group eligibility requirements for workers of a Firm under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a), can be satisfied if the following criteria are met: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; and (2)(A)(i) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; (ii)(I) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (II) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles— (aa) Into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, or (bb) Which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; or (III) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; and (iii) The increase in imports described in clause (ii) contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or (B)(i)(I) There has been a shift by such workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or the supply of services like or directly competitive with articles which are produced or services which are supplied by such firm; or (II) Such workers’ firm has acquired from a foreign country articles or services that are like or directly competitive with articles which are produced or services which are supplied by such firm; and (ii) The shift described in clause (i)(I) or the acquisition of articles or services described in clause (i)(II) contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. By application dated September 14, 2010, the petitioning workers requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination. AR 83. In the request, the petitioners alleged that increased imports of articles that were produced using the services supplied by the subject worker group contributed importantly to worker separations at the subject firm. AR 83. To investigate the petitioners’ claim, the Department issued a Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Application for Reconsideration on October 7, 2010. AR 84. The Department’s Notice of Affirmative Determination was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 65517). AR 286. During the reconsideration investigation, the Department obtained information from the subject firm regarding the petitioners’ claims and collected data from the U.S. International Trade Commission regarding imports of articles like or directly competitive with those produced using the services supplied by the subject worker group. AR 89–125, 126, 127. Based on the findings of the reconsideration investigation, the Department concluded that worker separations at the subject firm were not caused by a shift in services abroad or increased imports of services like or directly competitive with those provided by the subject worker group. AR 89–125. Further, the reconsideration investigation revealed that the subject firm did not import articles like or directly competitive with those produced directly using services supplied by the subject worker group, AR 89–125, and U.S. aggregate imports of articles like or directly competitive with hard disk drives declined in the relevant time period. AR 126, 134–136, 137, 141–142, 143–145. Consequently, the Department issued a Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration on February 4, 2011. AR 129–130. The Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register, on February 24, 2011 (75 FR 10403). AR 287. First Remand Investigation On April 11, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a complaint with the USCIT in which they claimed that their separations were directly caused by the subject firm’s foreign operations and increased imports of hard disk drives, and provided information in support of these claims. The Plaintiffs stated that the subject firm trained foreign engineers at the Lake Forest, California facility, who then returned to their respective countries to perform the same services as the Plaintiffs, and provided a list of job announcements for engineers posted by the subject firm in Malaysia at the same time as the domestic layoffs. Further, the Plaintiffs provided import statistics pertaining to hard disk drives, specifically pointing to increased imports of these articles from Malaysia. In a letter submitted to the Department on June 13, 2011, Plaintiffs provided additional information E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8282-8284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
January 16, 2012 through January 20, 2012.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the Following Must Be Satisfied

    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased 
absolutely; and
    (3) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive 
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have 
increased;
    (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are 
directly incorporated, have increased;
    (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more 
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or 
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more 
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
    (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have 
increased; and
    (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the 
sales or production of such firm; or

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) All of the Following Must Be Satisfied

    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign 
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or 
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
    (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the 
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly 
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
    (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' 
separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public 
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to 
become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services 
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such 
agency; and
    (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of 
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or 
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for 
such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
    (B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described 
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or 
threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade 
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply 
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
    (1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the 
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an 
investigation resulting in--
    (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat 
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
    (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat 
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
    (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat 
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
    (2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the 
date on which--
    (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the 
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to 
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is 
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
    (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in 
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
    (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the 
workers' firm within--

[[Page 8283]]

    (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
    (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding 
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        TA-W No.                  Subject firm                  Location                   Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
80,443..................  Olympic Panel Products LLC..  Shelton, WA............  December 13, 2010.
80,487..................  Stimson Lumber Company,       Colville, WA...........  September 27, 2010.
                           Arden Division.
81,039..................  HDM Furniture Industries,     Mt. Airy, NC...........  April 16, 2011.
                           Inc., Henredon Plant 10,
                           Furniture Brands
                           International, Furniture
                           Brands Resource.
81,039A.................  HDM Furniture Industries,     High Point, NC.........  March 31, 2011.
                           Inc., Henredon/Maitland,
                           Furniture Brands
                           International, Furniture
                           Brands Resource.
81,039B.................  Workforce Carolina Working    Mt. Airy, NC...........  February 13, 2010.
                           On-Site, at HDM Furniture
                           Industries, Inc.
81,039C.................  The Personnel Center, Inc.    High Point, NC.........  February 13, 2010.
                           and Onin Staffing, Working
                           On-Site at HDM Furniture
                           Industries, Inc.
81,054..................  High Cotton Enterprises,      Fort Payne, AL.........  February 13, 2010.
                           Inc..
81,118..................  Matrix IV Inc., The Agency    Woodstock, IL..........  February 13, 2010.
                           Staffing.
81,125..................  1SolTech, Inc...............  Farmers Branch, TX.....  February 13, 2010.
81,207..................  American Axle & Mfg. (AAM),   Detroit, MI............  November 25, 2010.
                           Detroit Manufacturing
                           Complex (DMC).
81,207A.................  MSX International, American   Detroit, MI............  February 13, 2010.
                           Axle & Mfg., Detroit
                           Manufacturing Complex,
                           Detroit Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act 
have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        TA-W No.                  Subject firm                  Location                   Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
80,448..................  Hampton Lumber Mills, Randle  Randle, WA.............  September 14, 2010.
                           Division.
81,024..................  Atmel Corporation, Colorado   Colorado Springs, CO...  February 13, 2010.
                           Springs, Colorado Division,
                           Planning and Assembly
                           Groups.
81,040..................  HDM Furniture Industries,     Morganton, NC..........  January 24, 2011.
                           Inc., Drexel Heritage Plant
                           75, Furniture Brands
                           International.
81,040A.................  HDM Furniture Industries,     Morganton, NC..........  January 24, 2011.
                           Inc., Drexel Heritage Plant
                           60, Furniture Brands
                           International.
81,040B.................  Friday Staffing Services      Lenoir, NC.............  February 13, 2010.
                           Working On-Site at Drexel
                           Heritage, Plant 60 and
                           Drexel Heritage Plant 75,
                           HDM Furniture Industries,
                           Inc.
81,137..................  Wellpoint, Inc.,              Andover, MA............  February 13, 2010.
                           Credentialing: CDO and CPC
                           Division, Aerotek, Kelly
                           Services, etc.
81,140..................  Bureau Veritas Consumer       Amherst, NY............  February 13, 2010.
                           Products Services, Inc.,
                           Global Quality Assurance
                           Department.
81,149..................  CQMS Razer, Jean Simpson      Mansfield, LA..........  February 13, 2010.
                           Personnel Services, Inc..
81,171..................  The Seydel Companies, Seydel- Pendergrass, GA........  February 13, 2010.
                           Woolley & Co., Inc.
                           Division, Spherion
                           Staffing, LLC.
81,177..................  Heartland Bakery Company,     Du Quoin, IL...........  February 13, 2010.
                           LLC, Maplehurst Bakeries,
                           LLC, Selectremedy.
81,178..................  Sunpower Corporation,         Richmond, CA...........  February 13, 2010.
                           Systems, Pluto Acquisition
                           Co., LLC., Aerotek, Bayside
                           Solutions, Robert Half, etc.
81,191..................  Bristol, Inc., A Business     Watertown, CT..........  August 19, 2011.
                           Unit of Emerson Electric
                           Co, dba Emerson Process,
                           etc.
81,208..................  American Axle &               Cheektowaga, NY........  July 18, 2010.
                           Manufacturing (AAM), Metal
                           Forming Division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 8284]]

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the period of January 16, 2012 through January 20, 2012. These 
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or 
by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 888-
365-6822.

    Dated: January 25, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-3322 Filed 2-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P