Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 8282-8284 [2012-3322]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
8282
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of January 9,
2012 through January 13, 2012. These
determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site at tradeact/taa/
taa search form.cfm under the
searchable listing of determinations or
by calling the Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 888–
365–6822.
Dated: January 23, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–3323 Filed 2–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of January 16, 2012
through January 20, 2012.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
Following Must Be Satisfied
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both,
of such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:57 Feb 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) The increase in imports
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) All of the
Following Must Be Satisfied
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition
from a foreign country by the workers’
firm of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and
the component parts it supplied to the
firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) a loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) An affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) A summary of the report
submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under
section 202(f)(1) with respect to the
affirmative determination described in
paragraph (1)(A) is published in the
Federal Register under section 202(f)(3);
or
(B) Notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally
or partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices
(A) the 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
8283
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date
80,443 .........
80,487 .........
Olympic Panel Products LLC ...............................................................
Stimson Lumber Company, Arden Division .........................................
Shelton, WA ..................................
Colville, WA ...................................
81,039 .........
HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Henredon Plant 10, Furniture Brands
International, Furniture Brands Resource.
HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Henredon/Maitland, Furniture Brands
International, Furniture Brands Resource.
Workforce Carolina Working On-Site, at HDM Furniture Industries,
Inc.
The Personnel Center, Inc. and Onin Staffing, Working On-Site at
HDM Furniture Industries, Inc.
High Cotton Enterprises, Inc. ...............................................................
Matrix IV Inc., The Agency Staffing ......................................................
1SolTech, Inc. .......................................................................................
American Axle & Mfg. (AAM), Detroit Manufacturing Complex (DMC)
MSX International, American Axle & Mfg., Detroit Manufacturing
Complex, Detroit Manufacturing.
Mt. Airy, NC ..................................
December 13, 2010.
September 27,
2010.
April 16, 2011.
High Point, NC ..............................
March 31, 2011.
Mt. Airy, NC ..................................
February 13, 2010.
High Point, NC ..............................
February 13, 2010.
Fort Payne, AL ..............................
Woodstock, IL ...............................
Farmers Branch, TX .....................
Detroit, MI .....................................
Detroit, MI .....................................
February 13, 2010.
February 13, 2010.
February 13, 2010.
November 25, 2010.
February 13, 2010.
81,039A .......
81,039B .......
81,039C .......
81,054 .........
81,118 .........
81,125 .........
81,207 .........
81,207A .......
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
80,448 .........
Hampton Lumber Mills, Randle Division ..............................................
Randle, WA ...................................
81,024 .........
Atmel Corporation, Colorado Springs, Colorado Division, Planning
and Assembly Groups.
HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Drexel Heritage Plant 75, Furniture
Brands International.
HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Drexel Heritage Plant 60, Furniture
Brands International.
Friday Staffing Services Working On-Site at Drexel Heritage, Plant
60 and Drexel Heritage Plant 75, HDM Furniture Industries, Inc.
Wellpoint, Inc., Credentialing: CDO and CPC Division, Aerotek, Kelly
Services, etc.
Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services, Inc., Global Quality Assurance Department.
CQMS Razer, Jean Simpson Personnel Services, Inc. .......................
The Seydel Companies, Seydel-Woolley & Co., Inc. Division,
Spherion Staffing, LLC.
Heartland Bakery Company, LLC, Maplehurst Bakeries, LLC,
Selectremedy.
Sunpower Corporation, Systems, Pluto Acquisition Co., LLC.,
Aerotek, Bayside Solutions, Robert Half, etc.
Bristol, Inc., A Business Unit of Emerson Electric Co, dba Emerson
Process, etc.
American Axle & Manufacturing (AAM), Metal Forming Division ........
Colorado Springs, CO ...................
September 14,
2010.
February 13, 2010.
Morganton, NC ..............................
January 24, 2011.
Morganton, NC ..............................
January 24, 2011.
Lenoir, NC .....................................
February 13, 2010.
Andover, MA .................................
February 13, 2010.
Amherst, NY ..................................
February 13, 2010.
Mansfield, LA ................................
Pendergrass, GA ..........................
February 13, 2010.
February 13, 2010.
Du Quoin, IL ..................................
February 13, 2010.
Richmond, CA ...............................
February 13, 2010.
Watertown, CT ..............................
August 19, 2011.
Cheektowaga, NY .........................
July 18, 2010.
81,040 .........
81,040A .......
81,040B .......
81,137 .........
81,140 .........
81,149 .........
81,171 .........
81,177 .........
81,178 .........
81,191 .........
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
81,208 .........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:57 Feb 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
Impact date
8284
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of January 16,
2012 through January 20, 2012. These
determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa
search form.cfm under the searchable
listing of determinations or by calling
the Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance toll-free at 888–365–6822.
Dated: January 25, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–3322 Filed 2–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–72,949]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Western Digital Technologies, Inc.,
Hard Drive Development Engineering
Group Irvine (Formerly at Lake Forest),
CA; Notice of Negative Determination
on Remand
On November 22, 2011, the U. S.
Court of International Trade (USCIT)
granted the Department of Labor’s
second request for voluntary remand to
conduct further investigation in Former
Employees of Western Digital
Technologies, Inc. v. United States
Secretary of Labor (Court No. 11–
00085).
On November 25, 2009, former
workers of Western Digital
Technologies, Inc., Hard Drive
Development Engineering Group, Lake
Forest, California (subject firm) filed a
petition for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) on behalf of workers
at the subject firm. AR 1. The worker
group covered under this petition
(subject worker group) consists of
workers engaged in the supply of
engineering functions for the
development of hard disk drives.
The initial investigation revealed that
the subject firm had not shifted abroad
the supply of services like or directly
competitive with those provided by the
subject worker group, that the subject
firm had not acquired such services
from abroad, and there had not been an
increase in imports of articles or
services like or directly competitive
with those produced or supplied by the
subject firm. AR 72–77. Further, the
initial investigation revealed that the
subject firm could not be considered a
Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a worker group
eligible to apply for TAA. AR 72–77. On
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:57 Feb 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
August 5, 2010, the Department of Labor
(Department) issued a Negative
Determination regarding eligibility to
apply for TAA applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The Department’s Notice of Negative
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on August 23, 2010 (75
FR 51849). AR 82.
The group eligibility requirements for
workers of a Firm under Section 222(a)
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a), can be
satisfied if the following criteria are met:
(1) A significant number or proportion of
the workers in such workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially
separated; and
(2)(A)(i) The sales or production, or both,
of such firm have decreased absolutely;
(ii)(I) Imports of articles or services like or
directly competitive with articles produced
or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(II) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles—
(aa) Into which one or more component
parts produced by such firm are directly
incorporated, or
(bb) Which are produced directly using
services supplied by such firm, have
increased; or
(III) Imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component parts
produced outside the United States that are
like or directly competitive with imports of
articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have
increased; and
(iii) The increase in imports described in
clause (ii) contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of separation
and to the decline in the sales or production
of such firm; or
(B)(i)(I) There has been a shift by such
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or the supply of
services like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced or services
which are supplied by such firm; or
(II) Such workers’ firm has acquired from
a foreign country articles or services that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced or services which are
supplied by such firm; and
(ii) The shift described in clause (i)(I) or
the acquisition of articles or services
described in clause (i)(II) contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation or
threat of separation.
By application dated September 14,
2010, the petitioning workers requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination.
AR 83. In the request, the petitioners
alleged that increased imports of articles
that were produced using the services
supplied by the subject worker group
contributed importantly to worker
separations at the subject firm. AR 83.
To investigate the petitioners’ claim,
the Department issued a Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Application for Reconsideration on
October 7, 2010. AR 84. The
Department’s Notice of Affirmative
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on October 25, 2010
(75 FR 65517). AR 286.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department obtained
information from the subject firm
regarding the petitioners’ claims and
collected data from the U.S.
International Trade Commission
regarding imports of articles like or
directly competitive with those
produced using the services supplied by
the subject worker group. AR 89–125,
126, 127.
Based on the findings of the
reconsideration investigation, the
Department concluded that worker
separations at the subject firm were not
caused by a shift in services abroad or
increased imports of services like or
directly competitive with those
provided by the subject worker group.
AR 89–125. Further, the reconsideration
investigation revealed that the subject
firm did not import articles like or
directly competitive with those
produced directly using services
supplied by the subject worker group,
AR 89–125, and U.S. aggregate imports
of articles like or directly competitive
with hard disk drives declined in the
relevant time period. AR 126, 134–136,
137, 141–142, 143–145. Consequently,
the Department issued a Notice of
Negative Determination on
Reconsideration on February 4, 2011.
AR 129–130. The Department’s Notice
of determination was published in the
Federal Register, on February 24, 2011
(75 FR 10403). AR 287.
First Remand Investigation
On April 11, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a
complaint with the USCIT in which
they claimed that their separations were
directly caused by the subject firm’s
foreign operations and increased
imports of hard disk drives, and
provided information in support of
these claims. The Plaintiffs stated that
the subject firm trained foreign
engineers at the Lake Forest, California
facility, who then returned to their
respective countries to perform the same
services as the Plaintiffs, and provided
a list of job announcements for
engineers posted by the subject firm in
Malaysia at the same time as the
domestic layoffs. Further, the Plaintiffs
provided import statistics pertaining to
hard disk drives, specifically pointing to
increased imports of these articles from
Malaysia.
In a letter submitted to the
Department on June 13, 2011, Plaintiffs
provided additional information
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8282-8284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3322]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
January 16, 2012 through January 20, 2012.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the Following Must Be Satisfied
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) All of the Following Must Be Satisfied
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
[[Page 8283]]
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
80,443.................. Olympic Panel Products LLC.. Shelton, WA............ December 13, 2010.
80,487.................. Stimson Lumber Company, Colville, WA........... September 27, 2010.
Arden Division.
81,039.................. HDM Furniture Industries, Mt. Airy, NC........... April 16, 2011.
Inc., Henredon Plant 10,
Furniture Brands
International, Furniture
Brands Resource.
81,039A................. HDM Furniture Industries, High Point, NC......... March 31, 2011.
Inc., Henredon/Maitland,
Furniture Brands
International, Furniture
Brands Resource.
81,039B................. Workforce Carolina Working Mt. Airy, NC........... February 13, 2010.
On-Site, at HDM Furniture
Industries, Inc.
81,039C................. The Personnel Center, Inc. High Point, NC......... February 13, 2010.
and Onin Staffing, Working
On-Site at HDM Furniture
Industries, Inc.
81,054.................. High Cotton Enterprises, Fort Payne, AL......... February 13, 2010.
Inc..
81,118.................. Matrix IV Inc., The Agency Woodstock, IL.......... February 13, 2010.
Staffing.
81,125.................. 1SolTech, Inc............... Farmers Branch, TX..... February 13, 2010.
81,207.................. American Axle & Mfg. (AAM), Detroit, MI............ November 25, 2010.
Detroit Manufacturing
Complex (DMC).
81,207A................. MSX International, American Detroit, MI............ February 13, 2010.
Axle & Mfg., Detroit
Manufacturing Complex,
Detroit Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
80,448.................. Hampton Lumber Mills, Randle Randle, WA............. September 14, 2010.
Division.
81,024.................. Atmel Corporation, Colorado Colorado Springs, CO... February 13, 2010.
Springs, Colorado Division,
Planning and Assembly
Groups.
81,040.................. HDM Furniture Industries, Morganton, NC.......... January 24, 2011.
Inc., Drexel Heritage Plant
75, Furniture Brands
International.
81,040A................. HDM Furniture Industries, Morganton, NC.......... January 24, 2011.
Inc., Drexel Heritage Plant
60, Furniture Brands
International.
81,040B................. Friday Staffing Services Lenoir, NC............. February 13, 2010.
Working On-Site at Drexel
Heritage, Plant 60 and
Drexel Heritage Plant 75,
HDM Furniture Industries,
Inc.
81,137.................. Wellpoint, Inc., Andover, MA............ February 13, 2010.
Credentialing: CDO and CPC
Division, Aerotek, Kelly
Services, etc.
81,140.................. Bureau Veritas Consumer Amherst, NY............ February 13, 2010.
Products Services, Inc.,
Global Quality Assurance
Department.
81,149.................. CQMS Razer, Jean Simpson Mansfield, LA.......... February 13, 2010.
Personnel Services, Inc..
81,171.................. The Seydel Companies, Seydel- Pendergrass, GA........ February 13, 2010.
Woolley & Co., Inc.
Division, Spherion
Staffing, LLC.
81,177.................. Heartland Bakery Company, Du Quoin, IL........... February 13, 2010.
LLC, Maplehurst Bakeries,
LLC, Selectremedy.
81,178.................. Sunpower Corporation, Richmond, CA........... February 13, 2010.
Systems, Pluto Acquisition
Co., LLC., Aerotek, Bayside
Solutions, Robert Half, etc.
81,191.................. Bristol, Inc., A Business Watertown, CT.......... August 19, 2011.
Unit of Emerson Electric
Co, dba Emerson Process,
etc.
81,208.................. American Axle & Cheektowaga, NY........ July 18, 2010.
Manufacturing (AAM), Metal
Forming Division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8284]]
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of January 16, 2012 through January 20, 2012. These
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or
by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 888-
365-6822.
Dated: January 25, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-3322 Filed 2-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
