Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India: Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 3730-3731 [2012-1530]

Download as PDF 3730 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2012 / Notices COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Sunshine Act Notice International Trade Administration United States Commission on Civil Rights. [A–570–848] AGENCY: ACTION: Notice of meeting. DATE AND TIME: Friday, February 3, 2012; 9:30 a.m. EST. 624 Ninth Street NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425. PLACE: Meeting Agenda This meeting is open to the public. I. Approval of Agenda II. Approval of the January 13, 2012 Meeting Minutes III. Program Planning Update and discussion of projects • OGC Clarification on Administration of Justice IV. Management and Operations • Staff Director’s report • Chief of Regional Programs’ report V. State Advisory Committee Issues • Re-chartering the Indiana SAC • Review of two Hawaii SAC applicants VI. Adjourn Meeting Briefing Agenda This briefing is open to the public. Topic: Redistricting and the 2010 Census: Enforcing Section 5 of the VRA. I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman II. Panel I: Speakers’ Remarks III. Panel I: Questions from Commissioners and Staff Director IV. Panel II: Speakers’ Remarks V. Panel II: Questions from Commissioners and Staff Director VI. Adjourn Briefing srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376– 8591. Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela Dunston at (202) 376–8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven business days before the scheduled date of the meeting. Dated: January 23, 2012. Kimberly Tolhurst, Senior Attorney-Advisor. [FR Doc. 2012–1602 Filed 1–23–12; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 6335–01–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:09 Jan 24, 2012 Jkt 226001 Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: January 25, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0665. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: We determine that it is not practicable to complete the final results of this review within the original time limit because the Department needs additional time to evaluate the arguments and submissions made by interested parties following the Preliminary Results. Therefore, we are fully extending the time limit for the final results by 60 days, to April 4, 2012, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: January 17, 2012. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2012–1529 Filed 1–24–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Background International Trade Administration On October 28, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the period September 1, 2009, through August 31, 2010. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 75 FR 66349 (October 28, 2010). On October 7, 2011, we published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of this review. See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Intent to Rescind Review in Part, 76 FR 62349 (October 7, 2011) (Preliminary Results).1 The final results of this review are currently due no later than February 4, 2012. [A–533–824] Extension of Time Limit of the Final Results Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act) requires the Department to issue the final results of a review within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary results are published. However, if it is not practicable to complete the review within that time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit for the final results to a maximum of 180 days. See also 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 1 In publishing the Preliminary Results, the Federal Register distorted the title of the notice; a correction of the title published in 76 FR 65497 (October 21, 2011). PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India: Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: January 25, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398. AGENCY: Background On July 1, 2011, the Department of Commerce (Department) published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip from India covering the period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 76 FR 38609, 38610 (July 1, 2011). The Department received a timely request from Petitioners 1 for an AD administrative review of five companies: Ester Industries Limited (Ester), Garware Polyester Ltd. (Garware), Jindal Poly Films Limited of India (Jindal), Polyplex 1 Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics (America), Inc. E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM 25JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2012 / Notices Corporation Ltd. (Polyplex), and SRF Limited (SRF). The Department also received timely requests for an AD review from Vacmet India Ltd. (Vacmet) and Polypacks Industries of India (Polypacks). On August 26, 2011, the Department published a notice of initiation of administrative review with respect to Ester, Garware, Jindal, Polyplex, SRF, Vacmet, and Polypacks. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 (August 26, 2011). On August 23, 2011, Vacmet and Polypacks withdrew their requests for a review. The Department published a rescission, in part, of the AD administrative review with respect to Vacmet and Polypacks on September 20, 2011. See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India: Rescission, In Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 58244 (September 20, 2011). On November 25, 2011, Petitioners withdrew their request for AD administrative reviews of Ester and Garware. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Rescission, in Part Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. Petitioners’ withdrawal was submitted within the 90-day period and thus is timely.2 Because Petitioners’ withdrawal of their requests for review is timely and because no other party requested a review of Ester and Garware, we are rescinding this review with respect to these companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). The administrative review of Jindal, Polyplex, and SRF continues. Assessment The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Subject merchandise of Ester and Garware will be assessed antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice. 2 The 90th day fell on November 24, 2011, a nonbusiness day. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(b), if an applicable due date falls on a non-business day, the Department will accept as timely a document that is filed on the next business day. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:09 Jan 24, 2012 Jkt 226001 Notification to Importers This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: January 19, 2012. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2012–1530 Filed 1–24–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–552–812, A–583–849] Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and Taiwan: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: January 25, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Bertrand at (202) 482–3207 (the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’)), or Scot Fullerton at (202) 482–1386 (Taiwan), AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3731 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Petitions On December 29, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) received antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) petition concerning imports of steel wire garment hangers from Vietnam and Taiwan filed in proper form on behalf of M&B Metal Products Company, Inc.; Innovative Fabrication LLC/Indy Hanger; and US Hanger Company, LLC (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’).1 2 On January 5, 2012, the Department issued a request for additional information and clarification of certain areas of the Petitions. On January 10, 2012, Petitioners filed a response with respect to general questions about information in the Petitions (‘‘Supplement to the AD/CVD Petitions’’). On January 11, 2012, Petitioners also filed responses specific to the Vietnam and Taiwan AD Petition (hereinafter, ‘‘Supplement to Vietnam Petition,’’ and ‘‘Supplement to the Taiwan Petition,’’ respectively). On January 11, 2012, Petitioners also filed a revision to the proposed scope language (‘‘Second Scope Revision’’). In accordance with section 732(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), Petitioners allege that imports of steel wire garment hangers from Vietnam and Taiwan are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value, within the meaning of section 731 of the Act, and that such imports are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, an industry in the United States. The Department finds that Petitioners filed the Petitions on behalf of the domestic industry because Petitioners are interested parties as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act and have demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to the antidumping duty investigations that Petitioners are requesting that the Department initiate (see ‘‘Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions’’ section below). Period of Investigation The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’) for the investigation involving Vietnam is April 1, 2011, through September 30, 2011. The POI for the investigation involving Taiwan is October 1, 2010, through September 30, 2011.3 1 See ‘‘Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Steel Wire Garment Hangers from Taiwan and Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,’’ filed on December 29, 2011 (the ‘‘Petitions’’). 2 A countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) petition was also filed on steel wire garment hangers from Vietnam. 3 See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(1). E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM 25JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3730-3731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1530]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-824]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India: 
Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: January 25, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-1398.

Background

    On July 1, 2011, the Department of Commerce (Department) published 
a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 
and strip from India covering the period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 
2011. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 
76 FR 38609, 38610 (July 1, 2011). The Department received a timely 
request from Petitioners \1\ for an AD administrative review of five 
companies: Ester Industries Limited (Ester), Garware Polyester Ltd. 
(Garware), Jindal Poly Films Limited of India (Jindal), Polyplex

[[Page 3731]]

Corporation Ltd. (Polyplex), and SRF Limited (SRF). The Department also 
received timely requests for an AD review from Vacmet India Ltd. 
(Vacmet) and Polypacks Industries of India (Polypacks). On August 26, 
2011, the Department published a notice of initiation of administrative 
review with respect to Ester, Garware, Jindal, Polyplex, SRF, Vacmet, 
and Polypacks. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 
(August 26, 2011). On August 23, 2011, Vacmet and Polypacks withdrew 
their requests for a review. The Department published a rescission, in 
part, of the AD administrative review with respect to Vacmet and 
Polypacks on September 20, 2011. See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 
Sheet and Strip From India: Rescission, In Part, of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 76 FR 58244 (September 20, 2011). On November 
25, 2011, Petitioners withdrew their request for AD administrative 
reviews of Ester and Garware.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester 
Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics (America), Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission, in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested 
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. 
Petitioners' withdrawal was submitted within the 90-day period and thus 
is timely.\2\ Because Petitioners' withdrawal of their requests for 
review is timely and because no other party requested a review of Ester 
and Garware, we are rescinding this review with respect to these 
companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). The administrative 
review of Jindal, Polyplex, and SRF continues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The 90th day fell on November 24, 2011, a non-business day. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(b), if an applicable due date falls on a 
non-business day, the Department will accept as timely a document 
that is filed on the next business day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Subject 
merchandise of Ester and Garware will be assessed antidumping duties at 
rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties 
required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for 
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date 
of publication of this notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: January 19, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-1530 Filed 1-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.