Tire Fuel Efficiency Consumer Information Program, 3726-3728 [2012-1525]
Download as PDF
3726
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
ACTION:
EPA issued a proposed rule in
the Federal Register of December 28,
2011, concerning proposed significant
new use rules (SNURs) under section
5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA) for the chemical substances
rutile, tin zinc, calcium-doped (CAS No.
389623–01–2) and rutile, tin zinc,
sodium-doped (CAS No. 389623–07–8)
which were the subject of
premanufacture notices (PMNs P–06–36
and P–06–37) and TSCA section 5(e)
consent orders issued by EPA. In order
to address public comments, EPA is
extending the comment period. This
document extends the comment period
for 30 days, from January 27, 2012 to
February 26, 2012.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPPT–2010–1075, must be received on
or before February 26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed
instructions as provided under
ADDRESSES in the Federal Register
document of December 28, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Kenneth
Moss, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–9232; email address:
moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA–Hotline, ABVI–Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA–
Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document extends the public comment
period established in the Federal
Register of December 28, 2011 (76 FR
81441) (FRL–9329–4). In that document,
EPA proposed SNURs under section
5(a)(2) of TSCA for the chemical
substances rutile, tin zinc, calciumdoped (CAS No. 389623–01–2) and
rutile, tin zinc, sodium-doped (CAS No.
389623–07–8) which were the subject of
premanufacture notices (PMNs P–06–36
and P–06–37) and TSCA section 5(e)
consent orders issued by EPA. EPA
received a comment in response to the
proposed SNURs noting that additional
information detailing the Agency’s
evaluation and determination under
TSCA sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i) and
5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I) for the chemical
substances was added to the docket. The
commenter requests that additional time
be allotted to allow review of this
information. EPA is hereby extending
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:18 Jan 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
the comment period, which was set to
end on January 27, 2012, to February 26,
2012 to allow for any public comments
in response to the additional
information.
To submit comments, or access the
docket, please follow the detailed
instructions as provided under
ADDRESSES in the December 28, 2011
Federal Register document. If you have
questions, consult the technical person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 18, 2012.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2012–1520 Filed 1–24–12; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 575
[Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0099]
RIN 2127–AK76
Tire Fuel Efficiency Consumer
Information Program
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of public workshop and
agenda.
AGENCY:
On March 30, 2010, NHTSA
published a final rule specifying the test
methods to be used for a new tire fuel
efficiency consumer information
program (TFECIP) to measure three
aspects of tire performance: Rolling
resistance, wet traction, and treadwear.
The final rule did not include any of the
requirements for the consumer
information and education portions of
the TFECIP. Instead, NHTSA announced
that, based on the comments the agency
had received on the proposal that
preceded its final rule, it had decided to
conduct additional research before
issuing a new proposal for these
requirements. NHTSA hopes to issue
this new proposal in 2012; however, it
has decided that it would be helpful to
have a public workshop to obtain
feedback on some issues that either have
proved difficult to explore effectively in
the research NHTSA has conducted or
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
have arisen since the publication of the
March 2010 final rule.
NHTSA invites interested parties to
submit written comments and to
participate in a public workshop using
the instructions set forth in this notice.
As described in the Procedural Matters
section of this notice, each speaker
should anticipate speaking for
approximately ten minutes, although we
may need to adjust the time for each
speaker if there is a large turnout. To
facilitate discussion, NHTSA has placed
documents concerning research NHTSA
has finalized since the March 2010 final
rule in the docket. NHTSA will consider
the public comments received in
developing the new proposal regarding
the remaining aspects of the TFECIP.
DATES: Public Workshop: The public
workshop will be held on Friday,
February 3, 2012 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
at the San Francisco Federal Building,
90 7th Street, San Francisco, CA 94013.
NHTSA notes that all persons attending
the workshop will need to clear security
before entering the meeting room and
should plan their arrival time
accordingly. If you wish to attend or
speak at the workshop, you must
register in advance no later than Friday,
January 27, 2012, by following the
instructions in the Procedural Matters
section of this notice. NHTSA will
consider late registrants to the extent
time and space allows, but NHTSA
cannot ensure that late registrants will
be able to speak at the workshop.
Comments: NHTSA must receive
written comments by Friday, February
17, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to the docket number identified in the
heading of this document by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Regardless of how you submit your
comments, you should mention the
docket number of this document. You
may call the Docket at 1–(800) 647–
5527.
Note that all comments received,
including any personal information,
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov.
Ms.
Mary Versailles, Telephone: 1–(202)
366–2057, Office of International
Vehicle, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Standards, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Email: mary.versailles@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
22, 2009, NHTSA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) proposing
a new consumer information program
for replacement tires (74 FR 29542;
Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0121). The
new consumer information program
responded to a requirement in the
Energy Independence and Security Act
of 2007 (EISA; Pub. L. 110–140, 121
Stat. 1492 (Dec. 18, 2007)), that directed
NHTSA to develop a national tire fuel
efficiency rating system and consumer
education program for replacement
tires. The program would inform
consumers about the effect of tires on
fuel efficiency, safety and durability.
On March 30, 2010, NHTSA
published a final rule specifying the test
methods to be used for a new tire fuel
efficiency consumer information
program (TFECIP) to measure three
aspects of tire performance: rolling
resistance, wet traction, and treadwear
(75 FR 15894; Docket No. NHTSA–
2010–0036). The final rule did not
include any of the requirements for the
consumer information and education
portions of the TFECIP. Instead, NHTSA
announced that, based on the public
comments the agency had received on
its NPRM, it had decided to conduct
additional research before issuing a new
proposal for these requirements.
NHTSA hopes to issue this new
proposal in 2012; however, it has
decided that it would be helpful to have
a public workshop to obtain feedback on
some issues that either have proved
difficult to effectively explore in the
research NHTSA has conducted or have
arisen since the publication of the
March 2010 final rule.
While NHTSA welcomes the
presentation of any information that
interested parties believe will assist
NHTSA in issuing the supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking
(SNPRM), NHTSA is particularly
interested in presentations that address
the following topics:
1. Rolling Resistance Coefficient
(RRC) versus Rolling Resistance Force
(RRF). NHTSA’s original proposal based
the fuel efficiency rating on RRF.
NHTSA received numerous comments
expressing the belief that the rating
should be based on RRC. NHTSA would
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:18 Jan 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
welcome any new or additional
information on this issue.
2. Experience in Other Countries. At
the time of the previous rulemaking,
NHTSA was aware of work by Europe
and Japan to implement similar rating
systems. NHTSA is aware that the
Republic of Korea has adopted a rating
system since then. NHTSA would
welcome a discussion of any experience
that interested parties have had with the
implementation of these other systems.
3. Laboratory Alignment. In the March
2010 final rule, NHTSA indicated that,
because the ISO had not yet specified a
reference lab for the ISO 28580 test
procedure, NHTSA would specify one
or more laboratories to operate the
reference test machine(s) for the
TFECIP. This would allow tire
manufacturers to know the identity of
the machine against which they would
correlate their test results. While this is
still NHTSA’s plan, it is aware that
questions exist concerning whether or
not it is possible to meet the sigma
requirements specified in the ISO
regulation. NHTSA is also aware that
other countries have adopted or are
exploring other options. NHTSA has
begun discussing other options and is
interested in any recommendations
interested parties may have. In
particular, NHTSA would be interested
in any experience with efforts to address
lab-to-lab variability under the ISO
28580 procedure.
4. Future Production. To assist with
estimating the potential benefits of the
rule and with defining the rating ranges,
NHTSA would be interested in any
information manufacturers would be
willing to share about how tires are
likely to change in the future because of
this pending regulation and any other
new regulations. See the Procedural
Matters section on how this information
could be submitted confidentially.
Procedural Matters: The workshop
will be open to the public with
advanced registration for seating on a
space-available basis. Individuals
wishing to register to assure a seat in the
public seating area should provide their
name, affiliation, phone number, and
email address to Ms. Mary Versailles
using the contact information in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section at
the beginning of this notice no later than
Friday, January 27, 2012. Should it be
necessary to cancel the workshop due to
an emergency or some other reason,
NHTSA will take all available means to
notify registered participants by email
or telephone.
The workshop will be held at a site
accessible to individuals with
disabilities. Individuals who require
accommodations such as sign language
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3727
interpreters should contact Ms. Mary
Versailles using the contact information
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above no later than
Friday, January 27, 2012. Any written
materials NHTSA presents at the
workshop will be available
electronically on the day of the
workshop to accommodate the needs of
the visually impaired. A transcript of
the workshop will be created, however
speakers may also submit materials to
the docket for the record.
How long will I have to speak at the
public workshop?
Once NHTSA learns how many
people have registered to speak at the
public workshop, NHTSA will allocate
an appropriate amount of time to each
participant, allowing time for lunch and
necessary breaks throughout the day.
For planning purposes, each speaker
should anticipate speaking for
approximately ten minutes, although we
may need to adjust the time for each
speaker if there is a large turnout. To
accommodate as many speakers as
possible, NHTSA prefers that speakers
not use technological aids (e.g., audiovisuals, computer slideshows).
However, if you plan to do so, you must
let Ms. Mary Versailles know by Friday,
January 27, 2012, using the contact
information in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
You also must make arrangements to
provide your presentation or any other
aids to NHTSA in advance of the
workshop in order to facilitate set-up.
How do I prepare and submit written
comments?
It is not necessary to attend or to
speak at the public workshop to be able
to comment on the issues. NHTSA
invites the submission of written
comments, which the agency will
consider in preparing its SNPRM. Your
comments must be written and in
English. To ensure that your comments
are correctly filed in the Docket, please
include the docket number at the
beginning of this notice in your
comments.
Your primary comments may not
exceed 15 pages. However, you may
attach supporting documents to your
primary comments. There is no limit to
the length of the attachments.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register at 65
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
3728
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
FR 19477, April 11, 2000, or you may
visit https://www.regulations.gov.
If you wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your
comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope
containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
How do I submit confidential business
information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, send
three copies of your complete
submission, including the information
you claim to be confidential business
information, to the Chief Counsel,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Include a cover letter supplying the
information specified in our
confidential business information
regulation (49 CFR part 512).
In addition, send two copies from
which you have deleted the claimed
confidential business information to
Docket Management, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590, or submit
them electronically, in the manner
described at the beginning of this notice.
Will the agency consider late
comments?
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
NHTSA will consider all comments
that Docket Management receives before
the close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above under
DATES. To the extent the rulemaking
schedule allows, NHTSA will try to
consider comments that Docket
Management receives after that date, but
we cannot ensure that we will be able
to do so.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:18 Jan 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Please note that even after the
comment closing date we will continue
to file relevant information in the docket
as it becomes available. Further, some
commenters may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically check the docket for new
material.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review,’’ and the
Department of Transportation’s
regulatory policies require this agency
to make determinations as to whether a
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and
therefore subject to OMB review and the
requirements of the aforementioned
Executive Orders. Executive Order
12866 defines a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as one that is likely to result in
a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
We have considered the potential
impact of this rulemaking under
Executive Order 12866, Executive Order
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
13563, and the Department of
Transportation’s regulatory policies and
procedures. This document invites
interested parties to submit written
comments and participate in a public
meeting on topics related to the
development of a SNPRM that will
propose requirements for the consumer
information and education portions of
the Tire Fuel Efficiency Consumer
Information Program. We cannot now
determine how the costs and benefits of
the yet-to-be-developed supplemental
proposal might differ from those
described in the Preliminary Regulatory
Impact Analysis that accompanied the
June 22, 2009, NPRM. (Docket No.
NHTSA–2008–0121–0015.) A full
analysis of the costs and benefits will be
released with the SNPRM.
Other Analyses
Because we have not yet determined
the requirements that will be proposed
in the SNPRM, it would be premature to
conduct any analyses pursuant to the
applicable requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive
Order 13132 (Federalism), Executive
Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform), the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, the
Paperwork Reduction Act, Executive
Order 13045 (Protection of Children
from Environmental Health and Safety
Risks), the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act, and
Executive Order 13211(Energy Effects).
We will provide all necessary analyses
pursuant to these regulatory
requirements in the SNPRM.
Issued: January 19, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012–1525 Filed 1–20–12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3726-3728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1525]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 575
[Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0099]
RIN 2127-AK76
Tire Fuel Efficiency Consumer Information Program
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of public workshop and agenda.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 30, 2010, NHTSA published a final rule specifying the
test methods to be used for a new tire fuel efficiency consumer
information program (TFECIP) to measure three aspects of tire
performance: Rolling resistance, wet traction, and treadwear. The final
rule did not include any of the requirements for the consumer
information and education portions of the TFECIP. Instead, NHTSA
announced that, based on the comments the agency had received on the
proposal that preceded its final rule, it had decided to conduct
additional research before issuing a new proposal for these
requirements. NHTSA hopes to issue this new proposal in 2012; however,
it has decided that it would be helpful to have a public workshop to
obtain feedback on some issues that either have proved difficult to
explore effectively in the research NHTSA has conducted or have arisen
since the publication of the March 2010 final rule.
NHTSA invites interested parties to submit written comments and to
participate in a public workshop using the instructions set forth in
this notice. As described in the Procedural Matters section of this
notice, each speaker should anticipate speaking for approximately ten
minutes, although we may need to adjust the time for each speaker if
there is a large turnout. To facilitate discussion, NHTSA has placed
documents concerning research NHTSA has finalized since the March 2010
final rule in the docket. NHTSA will consider the public comments
received in developing the new proposal regarding the remaining aspects
of the TFECIP.
DATES: Public Workshop: The public workshop will be held on Friday,
February 3, 2012 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the San Francisco Federal
Building, 90 7th Street, San Francisco, CA 94013. NHTSA notes that all
persons attending the workshop will need to clear security before
entering the meeting room and should plan their arrival time
accordingly. If you wish to attend or speak at the workshop, you must
register in advance no later than Friday, January 27, 2012, by
following the instructions in the Procedural Matters section of this
notice. NHTSA will consider late registrants to the extent time and
space allows, but NHTSA cannot ensure that late registrants will be
able to speak at the workshop.
Comments: NHTSA must receive written comments by Friday, February
17, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to the docket number identified in
the heading of this document by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern
time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Regardless of how you submit your comments, you should mention the
docket number of this document. You may call the Docket at 1-(800) 647-
5527.
Note that all comments received, including any personal
information,
[[Page 3727]]
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mary Versailles, Telephone: 1-
(202) 366-2057, Office of International Vehicle, Fuel Economy and
Consumer Standards, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Email:
mary.versailles@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 22, 2009, NHTSA published a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) proposing a new consumer information
program for replacement tires (74 FR 29542; Docket No. NHTSA-2008-
0121). The new consumer information program responded to a requirement
in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA; Pub. L. 110-
140, 121 Stat. 1492 (Dec. 18, 2007)), that directed NHTSA to develop a
national tire fuel efficiency rating system and consumer education
program for replacement tires. The program would inform consumers about
the effect of tires on fuel efficiency, safety and durability.
On March 30, 2010, NHTSA published a final rule specifying the test
methods to be used for a new tire fuel efficiency consumer information
program (TFECIP) to measure three aspects of tire performance: rolling
resistance, wet traction, and treadwear (75 FR 15894; Docket No. NHTSA-
2010-0036). The final rule did not include any of the requirements for
the consumer information and education portions of the TFECIP. Instead,
NHTSA announced that, based on the public comments the agency had
received on its NPRM, it had decided to conduct additional research
before issuing a new proposal for these requirements. NHTSA hopes to
issue this new proposal in 2012; however, it has decided that it would
be helpful to have a public workshop to obtain feedback on some issues
that either have proved difficult to effectively explore in the
research NHTSA has conducted or have arisen since the publication of
the March 2010 final rule.
While NHTSA welcomes the presentation of any information that
interested parties believe will assist NHTSA in issuing the
supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM), NHTSA is
particularly interested in presentations that address the following
topics:
1. Rolling Resistance Coefficient (RRC) versus Rolling Resistance
Force (RRF). NHTSA's original proposal based the fuel efficiency rating
on RRF. NHTSA received numerous comments expressing the belief that the
rating should be based on RRC. NHTSA would welcome any new or
additional information on this issue.
2. Experience in Other Countries. At the time of the previous
rulemaking, NHTSA was aware of work by Europe and Japan to implement
similar rating systems. NHTSA is aware that the Republic of Korea has
adopted a rating system since then. NHTSA would welcome a discussion of
any experience that interested parties have had with the implementation
of these other systems.
3. Laboratory Alignment. In the March 2010 final rule, NHTSA
indicated that, because the ISO had not yet specified a reference lab
for the ISO 28580 test procedure, NHTSA would specify one or more
laboratories to operate the reference test machine(s) for the TFECIP.
This would allow tire manufacturers to know the identity of the machine
against which they would correlate their test results. While this is
still NHTSA's plan, it is aware that questions exist concerning whether
or not it is possible to meet the sigma requirements specified in the
ISO regulation. NHTSA is also aware that other countries have adopted
or are exploring other options. NHTSA has begun discussing other
options and is interested in any recommendations interested parties may
have. In particular, NHTSA would be interested in any experience with
efforts to address lab-to-lab variability under the ISO 28580
procedure.
4. Future Production. To assist with estimating the potential
benefits of the rule and with defining the rating ranges, NHTSA would
be interested in any information manufacturers would be willing to
share about how tires are likely to change in the future because of
this pending regulation and any other new regulations. See the
Procedural Matters section on how this information could be submitted
confidentially.
Procedural Matters: The workshop will be open to the public with
advanced registration for seating on a space-available basis.
Individuals wishing to register to assure a seat in the public seating
area should provide their name, affiliation, phone number, and email
address to Ms. Mary Versailles using the contact information in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section at the beginning of this notice no
later than Friday, January 27, 2012. Should it be necessary to cancel
the workshop due to an emergency or some other reason, NHTSA will take
all available means to notify registered participants by email or
telephone.
The workshop will be held at a site accessible to individuals with
disabilities. Individuals who require accommodations such as sign
language interpreters should contact Ms. Mary Versailles using the
contact information in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above no later than Friday, January 27, 2012. Any written materials
NHTSA presents at the workshop will be available electronically on the
day of the workshop to accommodate the needs of the visually impaired.
A transcript of the workshop will be created, however speakers may also
submit materials to the docket for the record.
How long will I have to speak at the public workshop?
Once NHTSA learns how many people have registered to speak at the
public workshop, NHTSA will allocate an appropriate amount of time to
each participant, allowing time for lunch and necessary breaks
throughout the day. For planning purposes, each speaker should
anticipate speaking for approximately ten minutes, although we may need
to adjust the time for each speaker if there is a large turnout. To
accommodate as many speakers as possible, NHTSA prefers that speakers
not use technological aids (e.g., audio-visuals, computer slideshows).
However, if you plan to do so, you must let Ms. Mary Versailles know by
Friday, January 27, 2012, using the contact information in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. You also must make
arrangements to provide your presentation or any other aids to NHTSA in
advance of the workshop in order to facilitate set-up.
How do I prepare and submit written comments?
It is not necessary to attend or to speak at the public workshop to
be able to comment on the issues. NHTSA invites the submission of
written comments, which the agency will consider in preparing its
SNPRM. Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that
your comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the
docket number at the beginning of this notice in your comments.
Your primary comments may not exceed 15 pages. However, you may
attach supporting documents to your primary comments. There is no limit
to the length of the attachments.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register at 65
[[Page 3728]]
FR 19477, April 11, 2000, or you may visit https://www.regulations.gov.
If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of
your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the
envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by mail.
How do I submit confidential business information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, send three copies of your complete submission,
including the information you claim to be confidential business
information, to the Chief Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Include a cover letter supplying the information specified in our
confidential business information regulation (49 CFR part 512).
In addition, send two copies from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business information to Docket Management, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12-140, Washington, DC
20590, or submit them electronically, in the manner described at the
beginning of this notice.
Will the agency consider late comments?
NHTSA will consider all comments that Docket Management receives
before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent the rulemaking schedule allows, NHTSA
will try to consider comments that Docket Management receives after
that date, but we cannot ensure that we will be able to do so.
Please note that even after the comment closing date we will
continue to file relevant information in the docket as it becomes
available. Further, some commenters may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically check the docket for
new material.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,''
and the Department of Transportation's regulatory policies require this
agency to make determinations as to whether a regulatory action is
``significant'' and therefore subject to OMB review and the
requirements of the aforementioned Executive Orders. Executive Order
12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely
to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
We have considered the potential impact of this rulemaking under
Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and the Department of
Transportation's regulatory policies and procedures. This document
invites interested parties to submit written comments and participate
in a public meeting on topics related to the development of a SNPRM
that will propose requirements for the consumer information and
education portions of the Tire Fuel Efficiency Consumer Information
Program. We cannot now determine how the costs and benefits of the yet-
to-be-developed supplemental proposal might differ from those described
in the Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis that accompanied the June
22, 2009, NPRM. (Docket No. NHTSA-2008-0121-0015.) A full analysis of
the costs and benefits will be released with the SNPRM.
Other Analyses
Because we have not yet determined the requirements that will be
proposed in the SNPRM, it would be premature to conduct any analyses
pursuant to the applicable requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform), the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, the Paperwork Reduction Act, Executive
Order 13045 (Protection of Children from Environmental Health and
Safety Risks), the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act,
and Executive Order 13211(Energy Effects). We will provide all
necessary analyses pursuant to these regulatory requirements in the
SNPRM.
Issued: January 19, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012-1525 Filed 1-20-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P